Game 39 Preview: Blazers vs. Nets
A Look at the Nets
This game is dangerous for Portland in many of the same ways last night's game against Philadelphia was. The Nets have a couple of brazen guards in Vince Carter and Devin Harris. Harris is having a career year, averaging 23 points and almost 7 assists per game while shooting 45% from the floor and 83% from the foul line. Oh, and by the way, he draws 9.6 free throws a game. That's superstar territory. Carter needs no introduction. If he continues to be the jump-shooting scorer he's comfortable with rather than the insanely-effective slasher we saw earlier in his career, at least he's improved that jumper with age. He's also shooting 45% and averaging 23 per game with 5 rebounds and 5 assists. Plus he's coming off of a 1-10 effort against Boston last night which is going to make him interested in tattooing about 30 points on Portland's skull. The Blazers don't like wing scorers anyway, let alone two of them. Plus we're missing two guards out of our regular four-man rotation ourselves. Either we'll be throwing Captain Inexperience and the Olé Kid out there against Harris or we're going to be playing Nicolas Batum out of position and depending on Brandon Roy to play the point. Neither of those choices seem appealing.
Much like the Sixers, the Nets are stocked with adequate, occasionally dangerous role players. Brook Lopez already averages 8 points and 2 blocks per game. He also dropped 31 on the Thunder a couple games ago, which admittedly is like saying UFC Champ Brock Lesnar got 32 hammerfists in on his accountant the other day, but still. Bobby Simmons and Keyon Dooling have been around the block a few times. Yi Jianlian and Jarvis Hayes are having trouble scoring but each can break out with the occasional double-digit game. Trenton Hassell and Eduardo Najera are there for defense and hustle. Ryan Anderson and Josh Boone buttress the frontcourt. It's not a flashy group, but with those guards thrown in the mix it works. Basically everybody else holds you down while Harris and Carter beat you up. That's a technique that has foiled the Blazers more than once this season.
The Nets' biggest problem this year has been their defense. They allow opponents to score inside and out as long as the ball gets moved a little bit. There are too many weak spots individually in their lineup when it comes to defense, leading to a 101.3 average for opponents. The Nets don't force a lot of turnovers or block a lot of shots either, which could make up somewhat for the poor percentage defense. They're not horrid, just anemic.
The one area that the Nets have down defensively is rebounding. They're one of the better defensive rebounding teams in the league. Portland will have to work hard to get its usual diet of offensive boards and second shots.
Offensively New Jersey relies on the main options and makes everybody else line up for leftovers. Their starting guards plus Lopez are the guys to worry about. Everybody else either won't shoot enough or won't shoot well enough to break you. They're not fantastic inside scorers nor offensive rebounders. You just have to cover the whole floor against those guards.
The Nets are coming off of a stiff drubbing at the hands of the Celtics and won't be eager to repeat the experience at home. That's pretty much going to cancel Portland's "avenge last night's loss" mojo. This is going to be a tricky game.
Keys to the Game
1. Survive the guards. Normally you'd try to take one or the other out but with our backcourt stretched so thin the better plan is probably to match them score for score. That won't necessarily come from just our backcourt, of course, but Roy plus Aldridge or Outlaw or somebody pretty much needs to equal Harris and Carter.
2. Odenize Lopez. New Jersey will lose ground if Greg can score on Brook and also defend him. This lines up to be a great matchup.
3. Take advantage of the defense by moving the ball around, driving on the weak point, and then finishing or hitting an open shot off the dish. Basic Blazer basketball should be effective here if executed properly. A lot of one-on-one would probably be a mistake for anybody but Roy.
4. Get back in transition. This was one of the areas lacking last night.
Final Thoughts
The Blazers have usually started their road trips well. It's odd to be in a position of saying that this game could swing the trip. But it will. Win it and we could be a satisfying 3-1. Lose it and we're 2-2 at best and facing the possibility of a disappointing 1-3. Last night was a game where pretty much everything went wrong all at once. That won't happen again tonight. Let's hope a better showing is enough.
Enter tonight's Jersey Contest here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
40 comments
|
Comments
I think a lot of Blazers need to have a good game for us to win this one
Bayless/Sergio, Trout, Greg, Batum. If we win this game, we can safely forget about the Philly disaster. I’m going to have nightmares of Sergio guarding Harris. I hope Bayless starts.
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 14, 2009 11:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Just put up pictures from Philly game in a fanpost
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 15, 2009 12:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I think this is pretty much a tossup game
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Jan 15, 2009 12:47 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I haven't seen any true fire from this team since beating Boston. I've been disappointed with their laziness.
They seemed more exciting last year. Now this year the rotation is always changing and the team will sometimes stop playing hard. I mean what is wrong with Aldridge, guy should be scoring 20 game easy.
by BRoyInThe4th on Jan 15, 2009 12:54 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The 2nd and 3rd quarters of the Bulls game
and the 2nd and 3rd quarters of the Warriors game didn’t do it for you?
The comeback against the Pistons with Bayless’ D on Stuckey?
None of that was fire?
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Jan 15, 2009 12:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Everybody around here has short memories and zero patience.
You should know this by now.
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 15, 2009 12:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And everybody around here
loves to make sweeping generalizations about EVERYBODY around here doing the same thing even though 95%+ of the people here are reasonable, well-thought-out, and only here for good Blazer conversation.
—Dave
by Dave on Jan 15, 2009 1:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Glad you agree with me.
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 15, 2009 1:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
tomorrow I want to see Shavlik play in the RIGHT kind of lopsided game
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 15, 2009 12:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Lets Rally tonight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hope Blake is ok!
by Ryandog on Jan 15, 2009 1:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Two teams
Both on a back to back.
Both got blown out the night before, and want to avenge it.
Which one wins? The team that is consistently better. The team that has an unstoppable scorer who will get you the basket when you really need it.
Portland wins, with Roy making the plays we need down the stretch.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 1:17 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Rudy, come back, please.
Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16
by amlmart1 on Jan 15, 2009 1:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm, Devin Harris....
That’s a PG I’d like to see running the Blazers. I like Blake and I think he’s great 3pt shooter and can play well with our 1st unit but man I’d like to see DHarris give a go with this team. Championship team, I would think.
We are missing a handful of players now, eh? Webster, Rudy and now Blake. 3, 2, and 1. Shouldn’t this be the perfect time to show our “depth”? Whom ever moves into the 1 spot tomorrow, I hope is ready to run plays. If it’s a dedicated PG then it should be Sergio. I say that lightly but of the two, Bayless is still too unready. Does he even know the plays and what’s effective with the 1st unit? Can he learn that tomorrow morning during pregame drills?
Forget who starts for now, what about the 2nd unit? Will it be too bare? Can the 1st unit play long enough without breaks? Is Jersey going to give us foul trouble? All valid questions. I’m not extremely worried but more curious. I’d like us to go in there and set the tone early, and have them play to our pace and our game. Let’s pick up the D and force them to take hard shots, without being to overzealous to where are getting fouls call.
by dpnim on Jan 15, 2009 1:48 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
We don't even have a second unit
We only have three guards who can play right now.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 2:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, let's sign this guy.
http://slamonline.com/online/streetball/2008/11/hustlerE280%99s-story/
****, he can’t be worse than Jerryd Bayless. Then again, we’re all probably better than Bayless.
In all seriousness, though, it’s disheartening that a disease is hindering Stuart Tanner; it’s a shame.
by AK1984 on Jan 15, 2009 2:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just means our 3 guard rotation
will dominate.
I’m sure timbo prefers a three guard rotation to a three guard lineup.
Well, maybe not with this three guards.
Jergio will play well tonight, though. Everyone is expecting them to get destroyed. Therefore, they will not. In fact, Sergio will get 14.8 assists, and Jerryd will draw 12.3 fouls taking it to the hoop, and make 13.7 of his 15.3 FT attempts. Ball game.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 4:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

I'm a Blazers fan and If you ban me from your blog, I'll sue you!
by tominhawaii on Jan 15, 2009 4:33 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hey, Dave
Looks like the sidebar is breeding trade fanposts again. And not all of them are about the Nate Rob rumor, either….
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 4:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Tattletale
I say start Sergio. It’s his moment to shine. We need to see if he has the eye of the tiger.
I'm a Blazers fan and If you ban me from your blog, I'll sue you!
by tominhawaii on Jan 15, 2009 5:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's too bad about Blake's injury
At least he didn’t need a wheelchair…yes, I hate Dwyane Wade.
The Nets are kind of tricky; it’s hard to get a read on them this season. They seem to suck at home and lose to teams they’re not supposed to while occasionally showing flashes of brilliance. Perhaps the most surprising thing about them is that Carter is not yet injured at this point of the season, as well as Lopez’s emergence (I had incorrectly predicted that Robin would be better than Brook, even though the latter was drafted higher). Hope this one is a win…I didn’t see last night’s game, but based on the scoreline, it must have been embarassing.
Currently listening to: The Velvet Underground
by Marie on Jan 15, 2009 5:55 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
By the way
I voted Steve Blake as MVP besides Brandon in the 1/3 year awards. Anyone want to change your votes before tonight?
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 6:28 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Is this game on television kgw or tnt....??
and tip off time?…thanks!! ;)
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out burns out farms and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
by faith on Jan 15, 2009 7:25 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
On CSN, but not KGW or TNT, 4:30 pm pacific
by Corvid on Jan 15, 2009 10:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dwight makes a great point on his blog today...
We have to feed Oden. Whats the point in drafting a 7 footer if all you are going to do is settle for contested jump shots all night? To be a playoff team, Oden HAS to be the centerpiece of the this team, and that means we have to get him the ball. His inside game will develop, and until then, he is a good enough passer to get the ball to the open man. They at least have to start with Oden and let him draw defenders. I know every team has bad games, but last night was just downright horrible. Its okay to lose a road game, but not in that fashion.
by tmundal on Jan 15, 2009 8:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Brook Lopez
Is averaging 11, 8, & 2. Pretty solid, but he’s been inconsistent. Hopefully Oden will beast him into have a bad game.
by GUnit on Jan 15, 2009 8:30 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Forwards
Dave forgot to mention, these guys don’t really have any of them, do they? I mean real ones, that should be able to at least keep LMA from terrorizing them?
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:37 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Lets Hope Nate's Mind Does Not Wanders Tonight
Nate is freaking pissing me off the way he approach Oden’s playing time. He is so protective of Oden to a point where is a detriment to both Oden and to the team. Oden committed his 3rd foul IN THE THIRD QUARTER and Nate pulled him IMMEDIATELY. Oden sat out for the rest of the game. This happened several times this season already.
by Balian on Jan 15, 2009 9:42 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Has Nate ever played with, or coached...
A quality big man? Maybe he doesn’t use him the right way, cause he isn’t sure how its supposed to work ;)
by tmundal on Jan 15, 2009 9:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Teams that pressue the Blazers always have a chance to Win
The decent shooting in most games has obscured the fact that the Blazer offense is very mechanical. When teams pressure the guards everything breaks down. When good defensive teams play tight defense in the first half, the Blazers are lucky to get 40.
It doesn’t look like New Jersey is a very good defensive team, so the Blazers might be able to survive and pull it off in the end. What they really have to avoid is foul trouble. NJ is likely to put a lot of pressure on both the guards and the bigs with dribble penetration.
by ralphzillo on Jan 15, 2009 10:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Expect a lot of zone tonight
We can’t afford to have our guards get in foul trouble, when we’ve only got three of them, so expect a zone to protect against that. Expect a TIGHT zone, giving up plenty of open looks from outside, and forcing NJ to beat us that way.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 10:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No Worries
I wouldn’t worry too much about guards with fouls. Also, Nick Batum can play some guard if need be. He can check Vince Carter for instance.
by Balian on Jan 15, 2009 10:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jerryd Bayless
Bayless needs to have a breakout game tonight. He needs to show Nate that he is ready.
by Balian on Jan 15, 2009 10:30 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
And if his game isn't going well, at least he can 'Bay-face" the opponent.
And that should really be all it takes to conquer them.
by tmundal on Jan 15, 2009 10:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This stretch...
Should decide the future for Sergio and Bayless if nothing else. Blake obviously planned this injury so that the debate could stop.
by Zaig on Jan 15, 2009 11:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Or?
Has Bayless and/or Sergio hired a hitman?
Bayless isn’t getting playing time. Roy goes down and he finally gets some. Rudy soon follows and now Blake is out. Coincidence? I think not!
Sergio might seem innocent since he would never hurt Rudy, but maybe Rudy is in on the whole thing?
DUN DUN DUN
by Zaig on Jan 15, 2009 11:37 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 























