UPDATE 2: Tis so Sweet: Welcome to the NBA, Mr. Bayless, aka HUMAN HIGHLIGHT FILM (BAYLESS FTW)
[Note from Ben: Title shortened due to length.]
Bayless time has officially arrived. Portland needs to make room in the rotation for him - RIGHT NOW.
Tonight's performance was spectacular. 7 points in 6 minutes. "Acrobatic drives" is an understatement. Bayless is where "Hang-time-wait-more-hang-time-and-you-just-fouled-me" happens. The guy played so well tonight he deserves a minimum of at least 15 minutes a night.
It's time for Sergio to pack his bags. He's had enough time to prove himself, and hasn't. I wish him the best, but we need to make room for J-Bay. When Sergio was playing tonight and made another silly-Sergio-mistake, the Chicago TV announcers said, "my goodness, you'd think he would know not to do that." Sergio has had enough time in Portland. Time to trade him.
The only way to make room for J-Bay is to have him take Sergio's minutes, like he did tonight during the 2nd half. Bayless is a special player - you can tell it in the way he moves on the court. I don't know why Nate keeps fiddling around with Sergio when he has a player like Bayless.
If both Bayless and Oden make steady improvement from now till the end of the season, we might make the 2nd round of the playoffs this year - that's how much Bayless counts for us.
Update 1:
Hello everyone,
I appreciate the comments in this discussion. Some of you have done a nice job of raising different perspectives in this debate. Here is an article just posted on O-Live (J Quick) talking about the same issue.
I spoke to three team sources about this issue last night in Philly. The consensus seems to be what Quick wrote. Sergio is better at running the offense, but this is it. There weren't a lot of positive remarks given towards him - one coach rolled his eyes, and I know he was being honest, as I know his family pretty well and have seen this person in multiple contexts. However, when the conversation changed to Bayless, both had a lot more to say, using words like "great potential" and "has showed in practice what he can do - it's incredible." Thus, I think Portland is pretty high on Bayless. Nonetheless, they are giving plenty of opportunity to Sergio.
Update 2:
Unbelievable. BaylessFTW. This kid belongs. Any doubters? 23 points, 3 assists, 3 rebounds, 11-11 FT, 6-9 FGA/FGM . Make room for this kid in the rotation. He belongs. This is a breakout game for him. He was incredible - posterizing the nets with a dunk + foul is where "why we drafted you and your the summer league MVP" HAPPENS. This is the NBA, baby. Welcome Rex!!!!! Vote him in for the all-star team - do it now, Portland, vote him!!!
Go Blazers!!!
17 recs |
539 comments
Comments
unrek
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 12, 2009 8:11 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Gentlemen, start your engines!
It took us long enough to degenerate into point guard controversy! What is it, like halfway through the season?
by kickbrass on Jan 13, 2009 9:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you just wait, young man!
You just wait until your SergioFTW gets home!
The question we should really ponder is not why al-Zeidi could be so impolite as to throw his shoes at Bush, but why the dozens of other shoes in the room remained on people's feet, why no foot odor ever purifies the air at a White House press conference, why a man who throws his shoes at our president is more popular than our president himself.
by MT Suit on Jan 12, 2009 8:13 PM PST reply actions 10 recs
lmao
lolololololol
He's Coming! Oden Slayer of Giants
by Idog1976 on Jan 12, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Dane hasn't been under my saddle for a couple weeks, which indicates he may no longer be among the living...
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
go green
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 12, 2009 11:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you forget
hotstuff here flipflops to extreme’s more than anyone else on this board. i really could care less about what he says.
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 13, 2009 9:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought Hotty used to be a Sergio fan, actually....
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
depends on the day of the week
he can always be counted on to go to great hyperbole based on the last 24 minutes of Blazer basketball.
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 13, 2009 9:36 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm not extreme....
me?? To me, Sergio needs time right now more than any other player to develop. Unfortunately, there is no time on the current roster. I think Bayless is simply better for the minutes that are already there. Sergio needs more than these minutes and he’s not going to get them… one option would be to give him his time by sending him to the D-league for development…. i think this could actually really help him as he would get extended minutes and would either end the debate about his NBA ability, or keep it going.
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 10:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
too old for dleague..
you only have a limited window
Blazer fans tell me, where were you,
When our Brandon Roy dropped 52?
by GreatOden'sRaven on Jan 13, 2009 11:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you sorta are to the extreme
look at what you wrote about bayless being a better passer and having better vision than sergio…instead of getting down on sergio you say ask for his head by saying he should pack his bags.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so my metaphors may be extreme to you
but they just make my point…. i think bayless is better than sergio 1 on 1…. way better… as far as 5 on 5, take away rudy in that mix and there is no argument in my mind that bayless is a much better player head-to-head -
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 7:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i don't think you can make any argument
that will make people believe that bayless is the better passer and has more court vision when compared to sergio. if you’d like to prove me wrong then post a poll.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 7:57 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
You are correct, sir!
Sergio even sees things that aren’t there.
It is obvious that having Sergio on the team has helped showcase Rudy’s skills. Without Sergio, I don’t know that anyone but Blake would have tried passing the ball to him.
So Sergio has a role this year. Unless we are looking at a Pritch-slap ingredient, I think Sergio stays. A little healthy competition for back-up is non-suck.
"celtsfan700: Celtics are the most clutch team in basketball. BAR NONE. Nobody takes over fourth quarters like this team. They find ways to win every night, whether things are going good or bad ... it's the mark of a champion, folks."
by LaoTzu on Jan 14, 2009 12:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
trades
i think your right on in regards to pritch slapping. i just think it should apply to all of our players and not just sergio. since we have the upper hand right now why make trades for the sake of making trades? its not like we are in a slump and need a catalyst. however if theres going to be a KG/Pau Gasolish lopsided type trade…then throw in whoever.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 14, 2009 1:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
rudy sergio and channling for one kevin durant.
darn it.
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out burns out farms and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
by faith on Jan 14, 2009 1:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
heh
who needs a bench if we had KD right?
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 14, 2009 1:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
okay
i’ll give sergio an edge on passing…. i think the jury is still out on court vision… i’ve seen bayless make some nice plays, really nice ones – like that drive and dish to outlaw, who then hit that crucial 3 against Boston at home a few weeks ago…. remember that Boston game? That was a sweet Bayless performance…. yes, his court vision might not be equal or better than sergio, but it’s not miles away
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 14, 2009 7:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LMFAO
wow, you make me feal like im really learning alot about basket ball, and ive really only been watching hard since the back half of 06-07. sergio see plays on the court that bayless mey never see unless watching game tape at half speed, three times in a row. sergio and rudy are the only two gaurds that can leed to the basket with any regular success, and when it duznt work, its usually the recipients fault.
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 14, 2009 1:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i agree about sergio and rudy...
i’m not denouncing this combo – see my other comments…
The point with Rudy and Sergio, is that yes, they are good together, but they are not good enough yet to dominate the game, either one or the other, or together – therefore, it’s not much loss to see sergio replaced in the rotation at this point with another player – IMO
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 14, 2009 7:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
im not even talking about them together
im saying that they are the only two who can regularly lead a cutter to the basket with the pass. and to your point about rudy and sergio not being good enough to dominate the gaem, well neither is bayless. look, i like bayless two, but your not really coming off objectivly, thats all
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 14, 2009 12:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Better passer?
Get over yourself. His A/T ratio rivals Travis Outlaws, which as we know, is awful. Also, since he’s so good at driving to the hoop he should have a lot more easy kickouts than Sergio does.
by Zaig on Jan 14, 2009 1:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio is twenty times better......
in court vision and passing than Bayless, bare in mind i am a huge Bayless fan and dont think to highly of Sergio. Bayless: great offensive player and defender but not your “proto-type” PG. Rodriguez : Great passer and floor leader but cant guard my grandma or score on her either. That would be your abreviated scouting report on those two. How on earth you could say J-Bay is not too far off of sergio is quite frankly nuts. If you put Sergio on the NY knicks and he played 35 minutes a game he would average 6pts and 18assists a game, I mean Chris Duhon has more assists per game this year than probly at any point in his life. Duhon is closer to Bayless than Sergio skill wise. I mean come on chicago dumped him for the simple reason they had Hinrich, Gordon and then picked up Rose in the draft…….no need for a score first PG. My point being i think you should observe players and remain objective.
by blazerbeliever97504 on Jan 15, 2009 3:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio will be busy dribbling and passing while Jbay is busy dropping 20
No reason to keep J-Bay back – - who cares how many passes there were when you are running back up court with your 2 points…Sergio is a wonderful player…definitely has a future in the league . . .J-Bays skill set comes along only every once in awhile…its time
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 16, 2009 12:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hot stuff
was the most anti sergio fan…i liked debating the pros and cons about sergio with you more than him back then…all of a sudden he kinda stopped crapping on sergio and then came along board the bandwagon this year during the preseason…i guess now hes off it again. at least your consistent timbo. i dunno i’m finding myself sharing more common ground with you lately…at least to the point where i can hold a conversation.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i appreciate this comment...
i was less anti-sergio because it seemed like i was really bugging some people here… in the early part of this season, i actually had my life-line open for sergio, but now, i just can’t find much positive to his game on our squad… i think he needs more playing time – somewhere
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 7:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You don't need to be anti Sergio to want to get J-Bay on the court
A player who can take the ball all by himself and score will win out over who someone who can’t …period…With a lineup (noting Blake injury) of Roy Rex Oden LMA and Trav you have five people who can do that….frankly that is indefenseable even by all your phantom lock-down-defenders I hear tell of….doesn’t mean theres anything wrong with Sergio, just that Jerryd is here – - he has to play
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 16, 2009 12:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you don't
i want Jerryd to play too…don’t get me wrong, but its pretty obvious that some of the statements he made cannot even be backed up by Bayless fans.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 16, 2009 6:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think thats a bit quick
What about the several previous games where the exact opposite happened. I think Bayless will be better than Sergio, in Nates game, but it takes more than one good game. Or even two.
by twggyy on Jan 12, 2009 8:14 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
this is my own opinion, but
it’s pretty obvious that Bayless is way better than sergio out there. Sergio just doesn’t have a basketball fit. I disagree with everyone that says he’s improved this year. I think he’s actually gotten worse.
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 12, 2009 8:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
worse?
I think you would be hard pressed to convince most anyone of that.
by twggyy on Jan 12, 2009 9:14 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
'worse' may be an overstatement...
i just don’t think he’s done a whole lot of improvement…. some things yes, others no…
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 3:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
way better at what?
Defense: Bayless is much better
Running a team: Sergio is much better
They have such different skill sets it is really difficult to make a direct comparison.
I will say this and that is that the Bulls are the perfect team for Bayless to look great against as he will always be defending a guard, Rose, Hinrich, or Gordon, that is about his same size and his willingness to go over a screen is a great asset against at least 2 of these guards. Also, the bulls play extremely weak defense so Bayless’ ability to drive and finish look amazing against this porous defense.
Dont worry soon enough we will play a team with a poor outside shooting pg, but with decent interior defense and Sergio will look fantastic as he is able to find open guys and run the pick and roll a lot better than Bayless.
Also, can we all agree that J-Bay, or JayBay is the most effeminate nickname around and should be put out of use? I just like to call him Bayless. I cant tolerate all the variations on TRex, but JBay esque names are just nails on the chalk board.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jan 13, 2009 10:16 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
I like T-Rex ro the Face,
but JayBay makes me want to put on something frilly
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 13, 2009 11:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"JayBay" is GaySay -- not that there's anything wrong with that.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 7:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
nothing wrong with it if you're a homophobic frat boy
and you want to hurl epithets to disguise your homoerotic tendencies
The question we should really ponder is not why al-Zeidi could be so impolite as to throw his shoes at Bush, but why the dozens of other shoes in the room remained on people's feet, why no foot odor ever purifies the air at a White House press conference, why a man who throws his shoes at our president is more popular than our president himself.
by MT Suit on Jan 15, 2009 10:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
**** smooooch!!! ****
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 15, 2009 7:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
its kind of hard to compare them because they each bring a unique set of skills to the table. ideally i’d love for nate to use them situationally.
as far as nicknames go…you are right, but a lot of the BE nicknames are only used bc they are catchy but would never work in real life…such as Trout or LMA.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
as a PG? No way.
Bayless is good, I’m just afraid he’s a 2 in a 1’s body. In a perfect world, I keep both on my roster.
Catalina-Wine-Mixer.
by ArbyOSU on Jan 13, 2009 1:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Really? I mean... REALLY??!
Sergio just doesn’t have a basketball fit. I disagree with everyone that says he’s improved this year. I think he’s actually gotten worse.
No one is going to buy garbage like this that clearly isn’t true. If you want people to buy what you’re trying to sell, at least make it halfway realistic. That comment is garbage on so many levels, and if you’re really an objective person, you yourself have to admit that’s just a blatant lie.
by as11osu on Jan 13, 2009 3:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Lie or simple idiocy?
You decide.
"celtsfan700: Celtics are the most clutch team in basketball. BAR NONE. Nobody takes over fourth quarters like this team. They find ways to win every night, whether things are going good or bad ... it's the mark of a champion, folks."
by LaoTzu on Jan 14, 2009 12:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
poll?
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 14, 2009 1:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You seem to flip flop more on sergio
than john mccain did during his campaign.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 8:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
nah....
i just think bayless has outplayed Sergio the past 5 games and deserves more. I don’t think Nate should split their minutes between the two. Bayless should be rewarded for his strong play right now… if he stinks up the court, then yes, pull him. But right now, he’s got a few miles on sergio.
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 12, 2009 8:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i just dont see what this post proves
i understand you like bayless, and i do too, but why does it have to be at the expense of sergio? its kinda like kicking someone while they are down.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 8:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It sucks but
one of these guys is going to constantly be on the short end of the PT stick, barring an injury to Blake. Sergio is a good player, but do you ever see him as the starting (or for that matter, ever getting more than 20 mpg) on a Nate coached team? I think a lot of people, myself included, see Sergio as both valuable (to the right team of course) and expendable given the Blazers roster/style of play going forward.
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 9:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A 3 PG rotation won’t work, especially with Brandon consistently playing the last 8 minutes or so of ballgames at PG. There aren’t enough minutes to go around
My HDTV is a torrented game that I can watch lag-free :(
Let LaMarcus keep the headband!
by inroywetrust on Jan 13, 2009 12:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
why not a 2 pg rotation
with the 2nd pg being a situational player?
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
any player playing is at the "expense" of someone else... if i recommend X player it necessitates that Y
player will given less if not any time…. i don’t really understand your comment…. on any sports team, the athletes compete for positions that are at the expense of others – nature of competition
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 12:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
thats not necessarily true
Bayless’ success does not have to imply that Sergio is failing. A basketball lineup isn’t exactly PG, SG, SF, PF, C…it can be combinations of those things…hybrid positions…etc. Bayless and Sergio can succeed together as long as Nate provides them with roles to fill and the opportunity for them to succeed in those roles. Bayless and Sergio have played in the same lineup together…with albeit limited success, but it can work out in the end. Many have said that Rudy and Roy will never work…and while we haven’t seen them dominate together it has been pretty much a staple of our closing unit. I don’t see why a 3 guard lineup featuring Bayless and Sergio cannot succeed given time.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i see what your trying to say, but
both Jason Quick and Mike Rice have made the same remarks about one of these players filling in for the other… in fact, in Quick’s most recent podcast, he makes a direct statement that either sergio or bayless will win this backup spot, and the minutes won’t go to both.
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 7:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
its a lose lose situation
Sergio already won the spot…people complained that bayless wasnt getting any PT…and now that he is…people are complaining that it isnt enough?
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 7:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't this the nature of competition??
we would have the same conversation about anyone on this roster who could take the spot of somebody else…. there’s no way to accommodate everybody
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 14, 2009 7:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
When will you learn not to take what Quick says as gospel?
This is my first season here and I know better – - – dude….really . . . :-)
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 16, 2009 12:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
seriously?
I wanted to be sarcastic but I cant muster the effort.
Bayless+Sergio ==>severely lacking offensive firepower relative to ANY PG SG combo we could otherwise form.
Bayless+Sergio is the weakest defensive duo we could throw at opposing guards.
You don’t see how this couldn’t succeed given time? Either you’re blind, or you think Stephen Hill could succeed given time. Or maybe if we played Chris Dudley even more he would become David Robinson-like.
Oh wait. there’s that sarcasm :)
by nima on Jan 15, 2009 10:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Last 5 games?
You mean 3 games of 1/14 shooting, one decent stint of 7 minutes, and a decent stint of 2 minutes tonight?
by Zaig on Jan 12, 2009 10:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, John McCain
He was such a Bayless cheerleader during the Summer League, and then he totally went Sergio after the complaints about playing time. If McCain couldn’t stand up to Sergio’s agent, how was he going to stand up to Ahmadinejad? I think that’s where he lost the election right there.
by Kaboomm on Jan 12, 2009 9:28 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
You'd think McCain would have Bayless' back
since they’re both from Arizona …
by kickbrass on Jan 13, 2009 9:26 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
do you remember when he picked
Lute Olson as his running mate. What a mistake that was.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jan 13, 2009 10:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Kerry > Mccain
in the flip flopping department
by prezofdeath on Jan 12, 2009 9:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
they're pretty even to me, though i'm sure someone can search the internets and find someone that counted
honor rasheed wallace
i like ike
by Zaron5551 on Jan 12, 2009 9:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
your right
i wanted to use kerry…but mccain was the more recent example.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 9:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
personally
I want a candidate who never changes his opinions no matter what new evidence is presented. Terrorists won’t be stopped by ‘facts’ or ‘truth’. We can’t feed the poor with understanding and compromise. It’s too hard to be morally outraged over sex education and gay marriage if you’re busy weighing the merits of every side of an issue, besides, that just wastes valuable time that can be spent on soundbites and blind accusations. And you can’t frighten people into going green to stop Global Warming if you’re bothering to take time to explain the economic costs of reducing carbon emissions.
Any candidate who can blindly follow his or her party’s dogma without considering any alternatives or new information is the kind of strong leadership I want and this country NEEDS. I don’t want to hear about bipartisanship or reaching across the aisle….I just want to feel SAFE and SUPERIOR.
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on Jan 13, 2009 12:42 AM PST up reply actions 7 recs
right....never let facts sway your opinion! That would be weak!
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 13, 2009 9:58 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
this man knows what he's talking about
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on Jan 13, 2009 11:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
not this garbage
I feel like I am watching the 2004 RNC convention again.
Can we not reference politically shady tactics that are designed to sweep over the issues with broad generalizations. One of the cool things about BE is that when someone posts something that is not well thought out everyone jumps on board to clear things up.
BE, at its best, is the opposite of modern day politics.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jan 13, 2009 10:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was for politically shady tactics
before I was against it
"...we have so many experts who think that you have to play defense, you have to rebound, you have to be a possession coach, you have to execute. I just laugh. Explosive offense is not as intimidating as dominant defense. But it is scary when you don't know how to stop someone." - George Karl, Nuggets coach
by jamon51 on Jan 13, 2009 4:38 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I missed the first half
of the game but my impression of Bayless is – 2 guard yes. Point guard – no, at least not yet. Bayless still makes rookie mistakes like tonight with the pass to Aldridge in the post that was easily stolen. Plus a few others. Not the guy we want running the offense. No way does he see the floor like Sergio…
by lethaldose on Jan 12, 2009 8:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sergio doesn't see the floor...
he’s horrible at passing while driving down the lane. He puts his head down and nearly 70% of the time throws up an unbalanced shot or commits a turnover… J-Bay creates, passes, executes – yes, he may not be a PG, but he sure can do a whole heck of a lot more than sergio
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 12, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
dude, you're clearly in hater mode, so to i'm going to ignore you. Sergio see's the floor better than Bayless, that is a fact.
honor rasheed wallace
i like ike
by Zaron5551 on Jan 12, 2009 8:43 PM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Sergio's relatives are emailing Casey
about all the haters in Portland.
by MiledAnimal on Jan 12, 2009 9:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol...i can't wait to read the article
honor rasheed wallace
i like ike
by Zaron5551 on Jan 12, 2009 9:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think most of us see Bayless as the future but to make the claim he is better at seeing the floor or running the offense is just wrong
This is what Lucas would do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0aPkIE2qK0
by 123_G.O._RipCity on Jan 12, 2009 9:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless is a better long term fit
than Sergio, imo. Sergio needs to be in an uptempo system and, Warrior game to the contrary, that will not be Nate’s base offense. I think Sergio is a solid backup PG, but if he can be flipped for a strong backup PF, it needs to be looked at. Besides, he won’t be happy with spot minutes and unless the Blazers bounce Blake in his option year (not happening) this year’s mpg are probably his ceiling in Portland. Basically, if D’Antoni is in love with him to the point where he’ll send David Lee, that’s a deal I make yesterday.
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 8:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
ugh
so we can overpay drastically to resign Lee in 6 months to be a backup 4/5 getting 15-20 minutes a game?
I like Lee if we got him two years ago. Now, it’s just way too much to pay for the time he’s gonna get n the court. Better off finding a Lee-like hustle guy at the 4/5 in the draft.
Rule #1 of nitpicking is to get it right.
by douglast on Jan 12, 2009 9:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
Forget abot Lee like we forgot about Calderon. He is not 10 million.
This is what Lucas would do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0aPkIE2qK0
by 123_G.O._RipCity on Jan 12, 2009 9:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
worth*
This is what Lucas would do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0aPkIE2qK0
by 123_G.O._RipCity on Jan 12, 2009 9:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
i can’t picture lee coming now…but if he woulda came last year it would have been a diff story.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 9:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Or from Spain
We got Freeland available this summer
by danielfarrell on Jan 13, 2009 5:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The miles situation
could potentially mean he is not a Blazer next year. Especially if we are able to land a 1 that we really like. If we have inroads on someone who is not a 1 then Blake stays, but he and Travis are the guys we can dump to get some extra cap space if needed.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jan 13, 2009 10:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I hate to dump the guy who won the freaking game for us last night.
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 13, 2009 11:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
While Sergio would be best in a more uptempo season, he’s still the right quarterback for our 2nd unit. Bayless is best as a scorer. He has shown no ability to play the point. Long term, as we’ve discussed ad nauseum, Bayless could be a great fit next to Roy with the 1st unit, but for now he’s just 20 and Blake is doing a solid job in that spot.
The 2nd unit’s ball movement is much much better with Sergio at PG than with Bayless. I am fine with Rex getting ~5 minutes per game as a 2 guard (at least on offense) but Sergio still should get 15-20 mpg in my opinion.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Jan 12, 2009 8:45 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
more uptempo *team*
I have no idea why I wrote “more uptempo season” in my first sentence.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Jan 12, 2009 8:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i think they can coexist
we tend to go small with that 2nd unit anyways.
Sergio, B Rex, Rudy, Trout, (LMA/Pryz/Go)
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 9:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i wouldn't say "NO" ability
I mean, I’m sure he’s passed at least once or twice.
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on Jan 13, 2009 11:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus tonight his defense was horrible
Rose used him just as much as Bayless used Rose. At least it was somewhat of a push.
"I saw him in the face" Sergio's quote on the latest alley-oop to Rudy.
by blazermaniac32 on Jan 12, 2009 8:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I thought Hinrich looked good.
Just saying…
It’s nice to see a PG who is quick enough to stay in front of smaller guards, but still long enough to defend guys like Roy. (which he did a fine job on BTW) It was his first game of the season and he didn’t get into a good rhythm offensively, but defensively he still looks dynamite.
Now the hordes of Sergio/Bayless partisans will descend upon me in a cloud of rage for my blasphemy.
by Nick Van Excellent on Jan 12, 2009 9:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Once Kirk Hinrich gets back into form, he's the guy who should be targeted by Kevin Pritchard with ...
Raef LaFrentz’s heavily insured expiring contract as the bait. I’ve held that position for a long time, though.
by AK1984 on Jan 12, 2009 9:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
as have i, go get him KP
honor rasheed wallace
i like ike
by Zaron5551 on Jan 12, 2009 9:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm all for Hinrich
We’ll have to give up Blake or Sergio (most likely Sergio) to get him and make room at that position. I don’t want to give up Bayless I think it would be like giving up Petrovich
This is what Lucas would do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0aPkIE2qK0
by 123_G.O._RipCity on Jan 12, 2009 9:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
if i was chi
i’d take blake to back up rose rather than try to develop rose and sergio at the same time.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 9:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's my idea.
FROM CHICAGO & TO PORTLAND
PG Kirk Hinrich
PF Cedric Simmons
FROM PORTLAND & CHICAGO
PF Raef LaFrentz
PG Sergio Rodriguez
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=198130304543025&teams=222244&te=&cash=
Let’s do it to it!
by AK1984 on Jan 12, 2009 9:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
do it!
Blake
Rudy
Travis
off the bench is a lethal 3 point shooting lineup
honor rasheed wallace
i like ike
by Zaron5551 on Jan 12, 2009 9:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Eventually it will be
Blake
Rudy
Webster
Travis
1,2,3,4 now that is a lethal 3 point shooting lineup
This is what Lucas would do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0aPkIE2qK0
by 123_G.O._RipCity on Jan 12, 2009 10:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Nobody say Prtichslap otherwise Pax won’t pick up the phone :)
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 9:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah, I know that you're not the biggest Kirk Hinrich fan on the planet.
It nevertheless seems like Hinrich is the best available option, though.
by AK1984 on Jan 12, 2009 9:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's really not
Steve Blake is highly preferable to Hinrich in when salary and assets given up are considered. Its not really close either. Not to mention the fact in 2 years either Sergio or Bayless will likely be better than Hinrich anyway. Going for Hinrich would be a big time no-no.
by as11osu on Jan 12, 2009 10:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hinrich
isn’t meant to be our long term solution to PG…its meant to be a short term upgrade until someone else can step up at PG. Hopefully in 3 years Bayless, Sergio, or someone else can step up and fill in that role.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 10:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If all you get is a short term upgrade, just stay with Blake.
by raoulduke on Jan 12, 2009 10:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
There’s no crisis at point guard. Don’t make a change unless it’s the right change.
by Kaboomm on Jan 12, 2009 10:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i also don't think our biggest need is pg
i’m content with blake as is, but if there are other options available then kp should consider what is on the table. with the way blake is playing right now tho…its hard to find someone who provides more than blake at his value. it shouldn’t really be a priority to get rid of him as he provides us stability and his contract is very manageable.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 10:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the thing is
that most legit pgs can’t be had for a price we are willing to pay talent wise. any team that has a worthy PG will usualy hang onto that guy. getting an upgrade at pg may not help our team that much….but if that person could push and mentor the pgs we have in the pipeline or help us get passed the first round in the playoffs then the experience will be worth the upgrade.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 10:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Philthy, your voice sounds totally different with that picture imo.
I heart taxes.
by everett on Jan 13, 2009 7:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You are right. It isn't close.
Hinrich is basically Blake + superb defense – 4.7 million in salary cap. That sounds like a great deal. That’s like paying Blake 4.7 million more(9.5 million total) and suddenly he becomes one of the top 10 defensive point guards in the league.That would be a hard deal to pass up.
by Nick Van Excellent on Jan 12, 2009 10:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
since defensive pgs
are kinda rare…they all command a bit more money than the avg pg. its hard finding a defensive pg that has a reasonable contract. at least reasonable compared to blake. actually at blakes contract he is a bit of a steal.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 11:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly right.
It is worth it and then some.
I heart taxes.
by everett on Jan 13, 2009 7:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like it
I also like Gerald Wallace though.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Jan 12, 2009 9:56 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Gerald Wallace would add a bigger boost than Kirk Hinrich, but I'm more inclined to ...
move assets like Travis Outlaw, Channing Frye, Ike Diogu, and/or Jerryd Bayless in a deal for him. The Portland Trail Blazers should be able to acquire Hinrich at a cheaper cost than Wallace, with Raef LaFrentz being the only asset dealt in a trade for the defensive-minded point guard.
by AK1984 on Jan 12, 2009 10:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
why?
If the Bulls decide that this season is in the dumper then we wouldnt have to give up Sergio or Blake if the Bulls are just looking to dump salary. We may have to take on a Nocioni to get it done, but I would be willing to do that.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jan 13, 2009 10:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Hinrich look pretty good tonight?
I forgot just how good he was at keeping in front of his man. They stuck him on Roy most of the time with great results. I also found it curious that Hinrich wasn’t suposed to be back, yet the Bulls chose to play him tonight. They already have a minute crunch at the guard position so Hinrich’s twenty minutes wan’t really needed at all.
by Nick Van Excellent on Jan 12, 2009 9:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting observations
Showcase anyone…
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 9:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hinrich is a good fit
just overpaid is all. if he is worth it tho…money is of little importance.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 9:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
His contract declines every year
So he gets less overpaid as time progresses. Interesting to note.
by Norsktroll on Jan 12, 2009 11:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ya, those years in which we won't have any cap space anyway
complete non-issue. Actually hurts us because we need the contract smaller RIGHT NOW
by as11osu on Jan 13, 2009 12:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If the Bulls asking price
is RLEC and some stuff on the periphery, that’s a great deal for Portland. I’m a believer in Bayless, and I think eventually he’ll be better than Hinrich, but a PG situation with Hinrich as the starter and Bayless seeing the backup minutes for the next couple years would allow Bayless to develop at a good pace and upgrade the Blazers in a big way in the present.
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 9:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I loved his offense tonight, but...
Did you notice that once he got a few shots, he stopped looking to run the offense? It’s very dangerous to have your PG start thinking shoot first. Imagine Outlaw with the ball in his hands every possession. Okay, bad example tonight, but you get my drift. :)
Bring back the Uncle Cliffy!
by hawkblogger on Jan 12, 2009 9:06 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
noticed that too
for like 3-4 possessions in a row, he had NO thought other than shoot. he made a few, and at a time when we definatley needed them, but this kind of thinking from the PG can be dangerous
Rule #1 of nitpicking is to get it right.
by douglast on Jan 12, 2009 9:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you guys mean dangerous
like Devon Harris or Tony Parker? That would be awful!! Don’t you suppose that Maybe Nate said “Take it to the hole, Jarryd. It’s their biggest weakness, and no one else is doing it.”
by crakarjack on Jan 13, 2009 1:59 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Point I thought about too
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on Jan 13, 2009 11:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Neither Jerryd Bayless nor Sergio Rodriguez should be the point guard of the future, albeit for entirely ...
different reasons. Rodriguez is neither an efficient shooter nor a capable enough defender to mask Brandon Roy’s deficiencies there, while Bayless lacks the necessary court vision and desire to distribute to ever be a competent floor general. Bayless isn’t that great of a defender, either, although my standards for outstanding defensive point guards includes guys like Chris Paul, Rajon Rondo, Devin Harris, and Kirk Hinrich.
by AK1984 on Jan 12, 2009 9:06 PM PST reply actions 2 recs
that's why if Bayless has a future with Portland... its with Roy in the 1st unit
so that he can defend the 1, bring the ball up the court, then give the ball to Roy who can initiate offense. I agree about Sergio, though for now he’s still a good fit with the 2nd unit.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Jan 12, 2009 9:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but...
Roy probably doesnt want to initiate the offence the whole time he is in there. I think thats why blake works so well with him.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 9:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Bayless can initiate the offense some of the time
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Jan 12, 2009 9:43 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
To share the floor with Roy
you have to be good shooting the three
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
by DaniBCN on Jan 12, 2009 10:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
it certainly helps
Bayless shot over 40% in college (I know its a shorter line, but still) so he’s definitely a better shooter than we’ve seen thus far.
There’s still no question that Bayless will need to improve his outside shot, however.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Jan 12, 2009 10:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
While Bayless needs work now
he has the ability to be in that same group as a defender.
This is what Lucas would do. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0aPkIE2qK0
by 123_G.O._RipCity on Jan 12, 2009 9:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Hinrich is the best PG available considering what the Blazers need from the position. I’m high on Bayless as the starter, but Hinrich would be the perfect player to handle the starting job until he’s ready
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 9:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i like hinrich
he does have skills that meet our needs…but how does he fare against the quicker pgs? If he can’t guard them then it kinda defeats the purpose of having a defensive PG stopper when he can’t stop the ones we have the most trouble with. Granted all of the nba has trouble with those guards, but maybe then we can stop trying to stop them but use Bayless’ abilities and trade baskets.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 9:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just some anecdotal/observational
evidence, but against quicker players in the half court, I’ve seen Hinrich do a good job of using his size/length to make it difficult for the speed demons. Granted, no one guy is going to stop CP3, Parker, etc. on their own, but Hinrich makes you work. He really knows how to play D in a team concept, and with erasers like GO/Joel patrolling the middle, he can funnel guys to positions where help will be available.
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 9:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
thanks
even if Hinrich is only good for 3 more years or so, I wouldnt mind as long as we have someone we are grooming for the job later. Sorta what the mavs were doing with Harris…well except they got rid of him as he was coming around.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 9:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts exactly
I think Bayless is about 2 years away from reaching the point he needs to be to be a championship caliber PG for the Blazers. Hinrich would make that a pretty seamless transition, exactly what RLEC was made for
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 9:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ever?
Really? Ever? Can that really be said about Bayless at this point? I am more comfortable with your Sergio comments because we have seen him for over two years now but I can’t say that about Bayless yet.
Is Hinrich really a big enough upgrade from Blake to pursue him? I lean to others’ opinions who think Blake is a better value for the $$.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
by tssbro on Jan 12, 2009 11:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You made up you mind about JBay before the draft and seem unwilling to reconsider your position.
You have been making these definitive statements about Bayless future development since the day we drafted him. You have dogged him relentlessly as an undersized SG who will never learn to distribute and never learn to play good defense.
Fine, you have a right to your opinion. What irritates me is that you seem absolutely convinced about your ability to project the future development of a player who is 20 years old. Furthermore, Bayless isn’t just any 20 year old, he is a guy with unusual athleticism: speed, strength, and hop. The kid was a McDonald’s All American, recruited by Lute Olsen to PG University, and was generally expected to be drafted between 4-8 after one year of college. KP, who has not made a single bad personnel move, went to considerable lengths to land Bayless.
Despite all this, you are convinced that you know better than everyone else. If your powers of evaluation and projection are really that well honed, you should get a job in a front office somewhere or at least you should be working as an NBA scout. If you are not that much better than everyone else, I suggest a bit more humility. State your opinions and give your reasons, but acknowledge that they are just opinions, they are not definitive statements of fact..
Here is what I see. Bayless has extreme physical gifts, a relentless work ethic, and burning competitiveness. He is trying to learn how to use those gifts to play in this league. Yes, he has primarily been a scorer. He knows how to do that. He has excelled as a scorer at every level. Now he is trying to learn how to distribute.
I think it is stunningly presumptuous for any of us to say how well he will ultimately make that transition. It is obvious from watching him on the floor that he is willing to try. He has not been selfish. He has not been shoot first. In fact, prior to the last two games, he has mostly looked a bit hesitant. He has been trying to figure out when to do the thing he knows how to do, which is drive, and when to make the pass. Hesitancy and pressing messed with his shot. Now he is getting a bit more comfortable out there, and his production is increasing dramatically.
If you give Bayless the benefit of the doubt, and throw out his first game against Boston based on nerves, here is his combined stats for the last four games:
MIN 32, FG 5-15, FT 9-11, Ass 6, TO 3, ST 3, REB 4, PTS 19
That would be a pretty darn good stat line for a starting PG. For a rookie getting his first real minutes on the court, I would say it is close to amazing.
I am not saying that Bayless has arrived. He has a lot to learn and will make a lot of rookie mistakes, like he did on the botched entry pass last night. What I am saying is that the kid has shown us enough to earn a chance to show us more.
At some point, you need to evaluate your preconceived opinion of Bayless against his actual play on the floor. We all need to do the same. I have high hopes. You have very low expectations. Bayless will prove one or the other of us right.
by upper left corner on Jan 13, 2009 8:20 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Surely not
You have been making these definitive statements
AK? You’re saying AK does that?
You have dogged him relentlessly
Now I know you must not be talking about AK.
you are convinced that you know better than everyone else
This must be a false rumor.
If you are not that much better than everyone else, I suggest a bit more humility.
Surely AK is that much better than everyone else. Right?
stunningly presumptuous
stunningly presumptuous
stunningly presumptuous
stunningly presumptuous
Hmm, I seem to be stuck.
stunningly presumptuous
stunningly presumptuous
stunningly presumptuous
stunningly presumptuous
—-
Bayless will be fine. AK is just being AK. It’s what he does. Kind of like timbo used to be when talking about Sergio. Sergio is no all-star, but he’s ruined part of timbo’s fun by improving this year. And timbo is glad he did.
Jerryd will ruin AK’s, too. And the day will come when AK admits it, because as stunningly presumptuous as AK gets sometimes, he’s honest enough to admit it when incontrovertibly proven wrong. The day will come when AK says, “I was wrong, and I’m glad I was.”
Book it.
Well, unless he manages to get himself banned, but I think he knows the rules and will stay close enough to them so that doesn’t happen.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 13, 2009 8:51 AM PST up reply actions 3 recs
Ergo, I am no longer me???
Bayless will be fine. AK is just being AK. It’s what he does. Kind of like timbo used to be when talking about Sergio.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm, chanting CLANK! at appropriate moments during game threads and watching the people who have butch haircuts in emulation of Sergio go berserk DOES have its attractions...
………………………….. But actually, the big thing for me was two-fold.
(1) I did the math and figured out that Sergio going 1-for-3 or 2-for-6 from the perimeter vs. a guy like Blake who’d be more like 3-for-6 is the same thing as ONLY ONE TURNOVER — which is nothin’.
(2) Seeing Rex in game action made it clear that he’s not IMMEDIATELY ready to take over the backup PG spot — that there will be a learning curve he has to follow. (The dude IS a college Sophomore, after all, and everyone knows that lots of college players suck until they’re a Junior or Senior — and we’re not even talking about the NBA!)
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In other words
You’ve admitted you were a wee bit wrong about Sergio.
And Bayless. You’re still wrong about Bayless, too. He won’t be taking over the backup spot. When the time comes, he’ll be starting.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 13, 2009 10:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not wrong about Sergio -- I just overestimated the negative effect of his bricks...
I doubt Rex will go from #3 to #1 PG, very seriously.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 7:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hell...it worked for batum
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 7:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i think
you are a lot more open minded lately. not nearly as extreme.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Roy has deficiencies?
News to me. I have been telling everyone that he was born to a virgin. I should probably stop that.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jan 13, 2009 10:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
nah
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 13, 2009 12:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You spelled that whole post right.
You’re slipping, maid tu rek.
by Kaboomm on Jan 13, 2009 2:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
what's wrong with you he's perfectly healthy and alive to everyone else
honor rasheed wallace
i like ike
by Zaron5551 on Jan 12, 2009 9:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This post is silly...
Bayless looked good attacking the hoop, otherwise: meh.
Sergio ran the offense decently, otherwise: meh.
The blazers need better point guard play all around….
RUDY > MJ
by myemic23 on Jan 12, 2009 9:20 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
+1
Perfect practice makes perfect.
by Ojala John on Jan 12, 2009 10:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts from Friday, still holding true.
The bottom line is that Jerryd Bayless needs to play more. Oden and Batum have been playing all year and although they’ve had rough patches, things are getting better for each of those rookies. The question is how do we get Bayless more run? It starts by giving Sergio less time. I like Sergio, I think he is good for Rudy, but Sergio is one-dimensional and a liability on defense. Sergio’s shot is slightly better this year, but he still looks to pass even when he is point blank for a lay-in. There have been times this year where Steve Blake couldn’t keep up with his man, but Bayless most certainly would have. Most of the criticism abut Jerryd is his shoot first mentality on a team full of young stars. I think he’s well aware of his need to be a distributor and I’ve seen that happen at times when he does actually play.
The future I envision starts with Bayless and Roy in the backcourt. The great thing about those two together is that both should compliment each other so well. Bayless can handle point guard duties early on in games, while Roy will most certainly become the captain of the offense down the stretch. Bayless can guard the opposing point guard with no worries about saving energy for offense. The important part about this scenario is that it can happen a lot sooner then most are expecting.
For years we’ve waited for Travis Outlaw and Martell Webster to mature, but Bayless is much further along in his development then they ever were. Bayless, given the opportunity for more minutes this year, will be ready to contribute next year. I see him as our starter by the end of next year. Steve Blake becomes the second man off the bench and this would probably mean Sergio is gone. But at some point, someone’s gotta go and there is no way it’s Jerryd… he’s just too stacked with potential.
by GUnit on Jan 12, 2009 9:22 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Sergio has been superior to Jerryd all season
all of a sudden Jerryd has 2 decent games in spot duty and he’s supposed to supplant Sergio on the depth chart? Not bloody likely. Sergio has been good this season, and is the much better fit next to Rudy. If for some reason Blake goes down, Jerryd is the better fit next to Brandon, but aside from that scenario, Sergio should get all backup minutes that occur in tandem with Rudy Fernandez being on the court. No ifs ands or buts about it at this time. In the future, things may change, but Sergio has shown far too much improvement this year to be thrown aside for 14 good minutes in the backup backup role.
by as11osu on Jan 12, 2009 9:28 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
lol
Jerryd has only had played real minutes in a couple games this year. I don’t know how anyone can make a super strong judgement based on how much time Bayless has played. (that goes both ways)
by Nick Van Excellent on Jan 12, 2009 9:37 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
In their limited minutes this year Sergio has been better
and Nate has had Sergio in front on the depth chart all year, indicating he’s been better the whole year. If the goal is to win this year, Sergio being the backup point guard, especially next to Rudy, is the way to do that. Jerryd fits better with that first unit than he does with the second.
by as11osu on Jan 12, 2009 9:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If the goal this year was to win...
Jarrett Jack would still be on the team.
by Nick Van Excellent on Jan 12, 2009 10:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The goal this year is to win...
Which is exactly why we traded Jarrett Jack!
by david1978pdx on Jan 12, 2009 10:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We traded Jack because he wasn't getting any better.
He was and still is better than Sergio. The Pacers had him guarding Kobe Bryant the other night for long stretches. Could you ever see Sergio do something like that? Jack is a better perimeter defender than either Blake or Sergio. (something we desperately need) He’s also a better fit alongside Roy. The problem was that he had peaked and wasn’t going to cut it long term. Sergio and Bayless aren’t exactly ideal at the moment, but they both have a higher potential ceiling.
KP basically traded mature asset for a possible higher return in the future.
by Nick Van Excellent on Jan 12, 2009 10:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not that high on Sergio
So, we don’t need to be making comparisons with Serg and Jack… Serg can’t shoot or play D but Jack is more prone to making bonehead plays. Pick your poison.
Personally, I think Serg is a stopgap to give Bayless time to learn the NBA game.
by david1978pdx on Jan 12, 2009 10:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The trade to the Pacers was exactly what Jack needed
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 13, 2009 12:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless doesn't have Sergio's poise -- yet
But it’s interesting — he’s starting to get his minutes, partly from the power forward spot. That is, Outlaw gets moved to the 4, leaving three guards in the game in various combinations. Sometimes those combinations include Bayless. I guess it depends on whether we can play a small frontcourt against the opponent on a given night.
I’m pro-Bayless in the long run, but obviously he’s just getting a feel for the NBA now. He wasn’t necessarily ready after one year in college.
by Kaboomm on Jan 12, 2009 9:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Free Sergio!
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
by DaniBCN on Jan 12, 2009 10:02 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
If we love him we must set him free… from Nate’s system.
by Blazersaurus on Jan 12, 2009 10:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio needs to free himself...
That is, he has to free himself from all the Jason Williams comparisons and realise he is mediocre by NBA standards.
by david1978pdx on Jan 12, 2009 10:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Makes me sick...
He’s a special player, he isn’t a regular PG by any means (and neither is J-Bay), he has some special abilities that can’t be taught and some flaws on his game. The problem is that Nate wants to play him to his weaknesses, it’s always been the same problem.
Sergio can’t be an important player this way. He’s losing his magic just to please the coach, and without his magic he is nothing.
I wish he gets traded for the best of both parts, Nate and Sergio will never click together, and forcing Sergio to play this way is as dumb as using Greg as a 3pt shooter on offense or playing Roy as a center. Would you be so harsh on them if that was the case?
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!
by DaniBCN on Jan 13, 2009 1:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you have a point
he’s never going to be like Nate was as a player. And this will always bother Nate. – Elgin
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 13, 2009 1:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Neither is Bayless, though.
Who is the modern-day equivalent to Nate McMilllan at the point? Chris Duhon? :)
by EngineerScotty on Jan 13, 2009 1:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
tough question.
Who is 6’5" and plays great D for a point guard? Talk about your vanishing species. – Elgin
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 13, 2009 1:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jason Kidd. No wait…
Shaun Livingston was the closest thing to a Magic Johnson coming into the league for a long time, and unfortunately he had that freak injury.
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 1:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Defensively yes
Offensively, Rubio will be superior, especially in terms of passing/making his teammates better
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 13, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In his prime, Antonio Daniels fit the bill.
by AK1984 on Jan 13, 2009 3:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
one of the best comparisons yet
but Daniels was skinnier/wispier than Nate. Nate was more of a scorer when he had to be, too.
Daniels was usually a backup, and Nate was almost always a starter.
But there were indeed a lot of similarities. – Elgin
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 13, 2009 4:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Players like Nate and Ron Harper
simply can’t exist any more, at least not as PGs with the elimination of handchecking. Nate was a great defensive PG, like Ron Harper, but no way was he going to keep up with guys like CP or DWill without being able to put his hands on them, so you have the slightly wispier “big” PGs like Hinrich or Daniels as the closest possible iteration of a guy like Nate.
by Royster on Jan 13, 2009 9:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He still needs to learn how to be a better point
It’s good that Nate has been putting Bayless in situations where he will do well, i.e. playing defense and scoring the ball but he has a long way to go as far as being a facilitator. It’s hard to be a point guard in the NBA. You have to be a student of the game. Sergio is a better facilitator at this point, but Sergio isn’t a rookie either. Both of them will get better and it will be an interesting competition down the road. That is if they are both around.
by Thadius on Jan 12, 2009 10:17 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good distinction
Good individual skills don’t make a good point guard — it’s total awareness of the game. In summer league, he just needed to outplay everybody, which he did. But now, he has to be a basketball genius and that’s a learning process.
by Kaboomm on Jan 12, 2009 10:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Roy for PG
With Bayless as the 2 in the first unit… Then, put Blake in the second unit with Rudy, Trav and Joel.
by david1978pdx on Jan 12, 2009 10:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless fights through/around screens on D and is the only Blazer who does it regularly
Sergio would be a fantastic PG to have in case of an emergency, but I see no way that Sergio, Spain, Rudy and Sergiofan could deal with that.
Bayless has issues I know, but I’ve long since fallen for a tough PG who can finish. Kevin Johnson is one of my favorite players of all time and Bayless is the closest thing we’ve ever had to that.
by tweener on Jan 12, 2009 10:20 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
He got picked off several times and totally lost Derrick Rose. Przybilla wound up covering Rose one time.
by Kaboomm on Jan 12, 2009 10:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Derrick Rose is probably the most difficult player to contain off the dribble-drive this side of Lebron
I have watched Jerryd’s D on the high pick in particular and he is the best defender at staying with his man. Blake will get through sometimes, but often just leaves LMA or Travis to guard the point on the switch.
by tweener on Jan 12, 2009 10:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but I rewound those plays and watched them twice
It was because of picks, not just the dribble. I’m not sure I expected Bayless to get around those particular picks (in one case, through the legs would have been the only way through), but that’s what was happening.
by Kaboomm on Jan 12, 2009 10:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Both Rose and Rex were getting picked a couple times. The Chicago announcers commented on it. Young players, it happens.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually Rose went through Rex two times, scoring in both, 2 and 2+1 (Priz fouled him). Rose also forced Rex to swift defense in at least other three times, resulting in a three, a two and a foul.
Good game in offense though.
Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16
by amlmart1 on Jan 13, 2009 10:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ha
dude, you aren’t supposed to point out how completely wrong everyone is about him being a defensive stopper.
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 13, 2009 11:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Compare rookie Bayless at defense
to rookie Sergio.
And then go watch the third quarter of the Detroit game.
by Cablinasian on Jan 13, 2009 11:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
interesting point here...
what people seem to forget is that we’ve seen sergio for what will be 3 years now… i just think we’ve given this kid WAY too much opportunity…. it appears more and more that he’s around just to accomodate rudy and see what type of chemistry they have together
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 11:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They do have amazing chemistry
When Sergio and Rudy are on the court at the same time coming off the bench they have a positive impact on the team (+3 per 48). There isn’t a case to be made THIS YEAR for Jerryd to get Sergio’s minutes. If Jerryd gets better or Sergio gets worse, things may change, but at this point in time, Sergio is thus far, a successful backup PG. Your case would be stronger if for some reason you think we should look to the future as opposed to winning games now. In the future, if you believe Sergio is the odd man out, giving those minutes to Jerryd makes some sense.
by as11osu on Jan 13, 2009 11:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
amazing is an overstatement...
it’s interesting to think too what sergio would be like without rudy… that +3 wouldn’t be there…
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Probably not...
but also, Rudy wouldn’t be nearly as good either having to play with Bayless as opposed to S-Rod. You see, its not just Sergio or Rudy that benefits from their chemistry together, but the whole team.
Certain player pairs work really well together, in fact, even more so than Rudy, Sergio has an insane /- when playing with LMA (15 per 48), but they seldom see the court at the same time. Think about how many wide open jumpers Sergio creates for his teammates, and plug in LMA in Frye/Diogu/Przy/Outlaw’s place. That right there is what swings the biggest difference for the starting unit versus the second unit.
by as11osu on Jan 13, 2009 3:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
thats a horrible argument
Sergio was putting up big assist numbers his rookie year without Rudy…
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
what??
he avg. 3.3 asts per game… those aren’t big at all… i’m not sure why you feel so strongly about this cat
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 7:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
look at
his assist per 48…it was near the top in the league. 2nd to nash i believe….and while i know you are gonna come up with the line…well sergio did it against 2nd stringers while nash was playing against starters…well if thats the case then why isn’t there other 2nd string pgs putting up those numbers?
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 7:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
okay
this is a valid point… but, has he improved since then? my initial assessment would be no, but maybe you can prove me wrong
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 14, 2009 7:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he wasn't given the opportunity
since his rookie year…your assessment didn’t mention anything about improvement…all you said was the he was nothing without rudy, and i countered. has his skills improved? of course yes…has it resulted in stats? not necessarily. both he and bayless have pressed in the short stints they have had. i already proved you wrong in that he could put up assists without rudy, i dont know what else you want me to say in regards to that previous argument.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 14, 2009 9:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Proven Wrong
Checklist -
Sergio has shown no improvement/regressed – X
Bayless has better vision and is a better passer – X
Sergio should be in D league – X
Sergio can’t create assists without Rudy – X
Hotstuff flip flopping – X
Those are just the non debatable ones.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 14, 2009 7:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well that was just a jerk thing to do...
no one likes to be held accountable for the things they say.
by as11osu on Jan 15, 2009 12:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
spoke to j quick last night at the game..
he had some pretty harsh words for sergio in a private conversation that would nearly nullify your above comment - see his article on O-Live for a pleasant version of the conversation
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 3:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't be using private conversations publicly.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 15, 2009 8:05 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Timbo is Quick!
I'm a Blazers fan and If you ban me from your blog, I'll sue you!
by tominhawaii on Jan 15, 2009 8:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
rec
First, it’s not verifiable. Second, if you are accurately portraying what was said, it’s not really fair to him to do that.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
quick article
says nothing that praises 1 player at the expense of the other player that you commonly do. it had more to do with coaching and the organization and the future than it did with sergio and bayless individually. do i like bayless’ potential? yes…but at the same time you are making horrible statements about sergio that has been proven wrong. even in this 1 thread you have flip flopped regarding sergio twice.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 15, 2009 8:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i haven't "flip-flopped" .... i've been
less than adament at times to make this conversation constructive, hopefully trying to offer encouragement to both players in different ways – i might not have done a good job, and there might be some (sergioFTW) who don’t agree with the approach I’ve taken, but I’ve tried to make this conversation interesting and enjoyable. IMO, my original point still stands within me, and I think it’s “bayless time” and sergio should be off our roster….
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 9:03 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
thats fine
but…when you say that sergio has done nothing good, and point to a j quick article that says that they are basically apples and oranges and doesn’t support your claim, its hard to take you seriously.
there is nothing wrong with liking both of our backups as neither has reached their potential. theres actually quite a few people here that are vocal about liking both.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 15, 2009 9:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i see your point...
did i say somewhere that sergio has done nothing good? if i did, i didn’t intend this, and this would be outside the scope of my claim – if i did, let me know and I’ll clarify or take the comment back…..
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 9:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well if you are gonna take it back
then theres no point in locating it.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 15, 2009 9:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i just looked and didn't see anything...
believe it or not, i’m trying to be as objective as possible – however, a lot of me imparts my own philosophical bias onto how players ought to play, which I think we all need to recognize on this topic – the question becomes, which bias takes the best approach to interpreting reality? We’ll have to wait on this to see what KP does – In my view, it’s much more likely to see j-bay stay… however if this is wrong, feel free to throw a pie at me!!
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 10:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
it wasnt in this thread
i dont feel like digging into your history of posts to find it.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 15, 2009 10:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, his defense was very good against Detroit, specially coming out of screens.
Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16
by amlmart1 on Jan 13, 2009 12:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not knocking him either
I think he’s got ability but he’s in a learning process, and chasing Derrick Rose around multiple picks is part of that. He’s doing pretty well, and I’m excited to see him develop over the next couple years. (Though honestly I expect him to get traded before then. He just makes sense as a trade asset.)
by Kaboomm on Jan 13, 2009 2:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Stuckey and Rose are different
Stuckey is more of a big physical point guard where Rose is a burner, it didn’t completely surprise me that Jerryd struggled to stay on Rose, but part of his problem was playing him to tight and not understanding his tendencies. Jerryd might have been better off going under screens against D. Rose since his jump shot is so suspect. This just takes time and exposure to live game situations.
J-Bay may not be a pure point guard, but if he’s already showing this much willingness to work on defense in such a short amount of time he’s got a bright future when you mix that with his (projected) shooting and (demonstrated) driving skills. If he can ever learn to set up the offense at a reasonable level he’ll be golden.
Think about it, Blake already plays a ton of off guard, which is a large chunk of what Bayless will be required to do. a 4 guard lineup of Roy, Rudy, Blake and Bayless is pretty versatile and clear cut roles about who is a two and who is a one kind of get blurred anyway with this team; they’re all pretty much just “guards”
by nikolokolus on Jan 13, 2009 11:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We need another option; not sure who though
I agree that Sergio is not the answer, but Bayless is also unimpressive so far. He is getting so much passion from people only on the strength of his preseason play. Looking only at the performances he has turned in so far,I am underwhelmed.
by RIP.City on Jan 12, 2009 10:24 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Rex is still a very young rookie, a project -- but you can see what he's gonna be...
Sergio has more experience and more poise and one super-skill — his passing. He’s a great match with Rudy, obviously…
I totally and completely agree with the observation of GUnit above that Rex needs MINUTES NOW and that means some of ‘em at least come out of Sergio’s hide… But this whole Rex >>>> Sergio thing is greatly overstated at this moment in time. In reality, they are apples and oranges and you can’t even legitimately compare them. Rex will NEVER see the court as well as Sergio or pass as well as Sergio, so don’t pretend that he can. What he CAN do is get to the rack and finish and draw fouls — like Tony Parker, Rondo, etc. He’s a quick, cutting , crasher and you’ve really got to be willingly blind not to see the GREAT POTENTIAL to his game.
Does this mean that Sergio should be riding pine the rest of the year? Of course not. But neither should Rex be racking up DNPs and then passing the ball to referees or getting called for 2 ticky-tack fouls in 45 seconds when he does come in because he’s so freaked out being on the big stage… He needs 5 or 6 minutes a night EVERY night…
Over the long haul, it’s pretty clear to me at least how this plays out. But it’s not a quick thing — Rex is still a baby.
BTW: I just watched the Chicago feed of the game and there was NOTHING Sergio did that was capital punishment worthy. Just like he was being overpraised earlier in the year by about 80% of those commenting on him, now he’s being overcriticized. He is what he is, warts and all, great skill and all, and has proven himself a serviceable backup to Blake NOW.
(Man, it’s weird for ME to be sticking up for Sergio, is it not?)
t
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 12, 2009 10:28 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
(takes 2nd picture for sergioftw)
honestly…playing bayless 5 mins or sergio 9 minutes isn’t doing either one any favors. i think playing each exclusively in games based on situational needs is a better way to handle things. let them each alternate DNPs and the other can get full backup minutes. 15 mins minimum…and if they play out of their minds then reward them with a few extra minutes. if one of them goes 1/3 shooting in such short minutes…we can easily blame it on the small sample size or not getting enough touches to develop a rhythm…but if they had more minutes so that they wouldn’t have to press then i think we would see a more accurate representation of what they bring to the table.
by Philthyanimal on Jan 12, 2009 10:46 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
My Greatest Fear
Bayless = Second Coming of Jack
by jayzien on Jan 12, 2009 10:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Watch some Pacer games.
Jack is a fine backup. His defense seems to have improved as well.
by Nick Van Excellent on Jan 12, 2009 10:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Of course he looks better this year
Because he’s playing for the Pacers… I would have traded Jack straight up for Bayless… But we had to give Indiana something to work with too.
by david1978pdx on Jan 12, 2009 10:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Indiana is actually looking pretty damned shrewd for picking up Jack, actually.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
anyone with the injury-prone TJ Ford
would be wise to pick up another player who can fill in if/when Ford goes down.
My friend who is a big Pacer fan is totally thrilled with Jack. I told him he would have his ups and downs but overall he would be pleased with Jack. I explained that there would be plenty of times Jack would go to the hoop and not be able to get a shot off, but to live with that and overall it would be a win for them to have Jack. Pacer fan told me that I was right a few days ago. – Elgin
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 13, 2009 1:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe...
but tell that same Pacer fan he could’ve kept Jerryd Bayless instead, and they’d all be singing a different tune. Although defensively its painful, running the type of offense Indiana runs, J-Bay could’ve been an immediate Monta Ellis type from the get go.
by as11osu on Jan 13, 2009 3:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless still makes rookie mistakes
Be patient. He needs time to grow. Sergio is still on track to be an allstar…
by ladygonegrey on Jan 12, 2009 10:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
[Sergio is still on track to be an allstar...] ........................ in Spain.
Sorry, couldn’t help myself…
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's see...
Even with Nash and Kidd retired one day, there would still be Paul, Williams, Parker in the first tire, then Davis, Farmar, now also Westbrook…
Better chances in the East? Rondo, Harris, Calderon, …
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 9:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Forgot Billups in the West, who is on the older side but still has a few years left.
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 9:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"Sergio is still on track to be an allstar…"
Yeah. I’m surprised New Orleans hasn’t called to trade Chris Paul for him.
by Kaboomm on Jan 12, 2009 10:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Memphis?
Sergio could get some serious minutes to develop there, and that’d be scary. Gay would be on the highlight reel every night with lobs from Sergio. That goes against the Sergio not hurting the Blazers in the future clause though. The East also wants some quality PGs in the future.
by Zaig on Jan 12, 2009 10:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio would do well in Memphis
but something tells me KP and Wallace might not be on the best of terms, even if a deal makes sense :)
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 11:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sergio would do well on just about any other team in the league
his shot looked better tonight, and he took it to the rim, mist one(outlaw putback?) and made one, that lookded sick. there was more ark in his three point in and out attempt. he also got one steal to go with his one turnover. when sergio had the ball, everybody sand bagged him by just standing arround. Free Sergio!!
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 13, 2009 1:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Which game?
Sergio didn’t have a turnover or a steal against the Bulls.
by Zaig on Jan 13, 2009 2:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, ur right, my bad
i watched the golden state game just befor the chicago game and had some mental carry over. i just rewatched the chicago game and sergio only got about 2 and a half minutes at the end of the first, and never saw the floor again. he still played decent thow with a couple of niice passes that were either dropped(travisz) or fouled(lamarcus). he took it to the rack at least once, and had a nice looking three that didnt stay down. his defence was neither hear nore there.
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 14, 2009 1:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
5
Box score says it ended with 5, although it didn’t feel that long. Teammates missed shots, which led to 0 assists. 1/4 shooting is pretty bad, although when you have that few of shots it’s now awful. His 3 goes one centimeter one direction and he’s 2/4. Regardless, he had one play where the shot clock ran low (and they got a wide open shot anyway) so he hit the bench for the rest of the game.
by Zaig on Jan 14, 2009 1:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i watched it again, and he did not play 5 min
yeah, the only play that he seamed to “over dribble” led to an open jumper for roy, that roy mist. he was pulled after passing ahead to outlaw on a fast break, and outlaw lost control of the ball. MB said that the ball was poked away, but it wasnt, nobody was close. his play wasnt deserving of being pulled imo, and i did watch closely, replaying everything looking for mistakes. i litteraly had a sergio specifik play by play written out to illistrate, but when i realised i was wrong about the first point i discarded it as it was then off topic, but im certainly will to do it agian if you like.
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 14, 2009 2:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Than KP needs to suck it up
And apologize for making a big deal out of Miles.
"Hightide was the only "Yes" vote" - parkinglotj
Joel Freeland=Stud
by hightide on Jan 13, 2009 1:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol, no
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 13, 2009 3:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio
Improved his shot in the off season and will the next off season as well. His one real issue now is his strength. Everything that people criticize him for is basically a strength issue.
1. His defense. He gets pushed around too easily and can’t fight through the screens.
2. His ability to finish. The guy gets fouled more often than is called (lol NBA refs), but he does need more strength to deal with the bumping that takes place down low.
Both these issues can be resolved with bulking up a little. That comes naturally with age, but I think the trainers need to work with him as well to speed up the process. Once he stops getting pushed around so much, watch out.
Anyone griping about turnovers is an uneducated tool. Sergio averages just over 4 turnovers per 48. Bayless averages almost 6. Before you jump on the “BAYLESS IS A ROOKIE” bandwagon, keep in mind that his rookie year Sergio averged just under 5 turnovers per 48, still a full turnover LESS than Bayless per 48.
Another note. When Steve Nash was Sergio’s age, he was averaging 3 points and 2 assists a game. I’m not saying that Sergio will turn into the freak that Nash did, but some point guards take longer to develop. Sergio clearly has the potential, but we’ll see.
Yet another note. Sergio can see everyone on the floor, not just Rudy. The problem is, no one else on the floor moves like Rudy does. Can you imagine what would happen if Outlaw stopped standing on the baseline and cut to the hoop? He’s taller than Rudy, has longer arms, and can probably jump higher.
A final sad note. Sergio might be a better fit with another team, one that moves around on offense more. Somewhere back East hopefully so that we don’t have to deal with him in the West in a couple of years. Miami maybe? (Although they’re big on their rookie PG I think.) Possibly 76ers, get that high powered, yet dead, offense of theirs moving.
by Zaig on Jan 12, 2009 10:56 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Valid points
A final sad note. Sergio might be a better fit with another team, one that moves around on offense more. Somewhere back East hopefully so that we don’t have to deal with him in the West in a couple of years. Miami maybe? (Although they’re big on their rookie PG I think.) Possibly 76ers, get that high powered, yet dead, offense of theirs moving.
While I don’t think he’ll be Nash (like you said, that guy is a freak) I agree with your basic premise (Sergio can play) and your conclusion (to get the most out of his game, Sergio needs either a change of style by the Blazers/change of address). I also think the latter is more likely. An up tempo team would be wise to pick him up, I think there could be a deal to be had if KP can find somebody who wants to go that route and has an asset the Blazers could use in return.
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 11:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I see sergio and think that he has shown steady improvement this year.
Watching him play you can see he’s starting to recognize when a lane opens up to the rim and he’s starting to finish, when at the beginning of the season you’d be hard pressed to see him convert a lay-up in traffic. He’s clearly getting more aggressive, even drawing fouls, playing within the offense and starting to get his head in games. Not just going through the motions of penetrate and dish. As long as a player is getting better, and Sergio has been – we shouldn’t be so quick to push him aside just because Bayless starts to find his offense. The only thing I think that Sergio has the most room to improve, is that his outside shot leaves alot to be desired. The rest is right on track with expectations. I am not ready to trade Sergio just yet cause if we do I think we are gonna regret it one day.
by lethaldose on Jan 12, 2009 11:29 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio Rodriguez is most similar to fellow countryman Raul Lopez.
If you look at the advanced statistics, it’s pretty easy to draw that comparison.
by AK1984 on Jan 12, 2009 11:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the difference is
Steve Nash could always shoot———41% 3pt his rookie year
by raging WebTed on Jan 13, 2009 3:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Shooters
Terry Porter couldn’t shoot the 3 ball when he entered the league. (Age 22, same as Sergio is now.) .310 and .217 averages his first two years. Sergio’s shot will come, I still think it’s the strength issue that he needs to work on.
by Zaig on Jan 14, 2009 1:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah
I’m still all for trading Bayless for DJ straight up!
by Zaig on Jan 12, 2009 10:57 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
This is why we drafted Bayless
Every facilitator, i.e. Tracey McGrady, Michael Jordan, K*be Bryant, Lebron James, or Brandon Roy needs a point guard that can do three things.
1. Be a good spot up three point shooter.
2. Play good defense
3. Bring the ball up the court (good ball handling skills)
*get four or so assists or so a game
It is very difficult to find all three of those things in one point guard but Pritchard thought Bayless could eventually be that complement to Brandon. One of the reasons why Cleveland is doing much better this year is because Mo Williams is that guy to James. Blake plays this role now and does a pretty good job. I mean Steve Kerr wasn’t a superstar but he complemented Jordan well. Bayless isn’t there yet but give him time.
by Thadius on Jan 12, 2009 10:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Good points
I think Rex can do 2 and 3 fairly well right now (at least enough of 3 to initiate the offense when called to do so). #1 is the real key, this could be a big offseason in the gym for him, but I wonder how much Martell’s return will alleviate some of that pressure on the backup PGs – right now Blake is the only starter who can consistently hit the open 3 ball, and teams can really pack in when Brandon is on the floor with anyone other than Blake/Rudy and Travis aren’t hitting.
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 12, 2009 11:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Martell
I have been saying the same thing since last summer. Martell’s shooting is the key to making it possible for Bayless to get on the floor with the starters.
Martell’s shooting + Bayless’ driving = lots of offensive options
by upper left corner on Jan 14, 2009 8:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention Martell's driving
too bad about Bayless’s shooting from 3. – Elgin
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 14, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jerryd Bayless isn't a spot-up shooter, but rather a major ball hog who looks to create his own shot.
That, by the way, is proven by Bayless’ sizeable usage rate (23.7) for someone who’s just a rookie scrub at this point in his career. Without a doubt, Bayless isn’t a guy who’ll willing defer to his teammates; thus, that doesn’t only write him out as a viable option at point guard, but also as a player who can play second fiddle in a backcourt beside a budding star like Brandon Roy. Bayless is a turnover prone distributor, too, for he averages only 2.3 assists per bad pass — while Brandon Roy averaged 7.8 assists per bad pass as a rookie — according to the www.82games.com website.
by AK1984 on Jan 13, 2009 12:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You seem to have something personal against Bayless.
Instead of judging a player by obscure stats try watching him play. He really doesn’t come off as selfish at all. We have been needing a PG who can slash and drive without fear, that’s what Jerryd has been doing and that’s why he’s in games lately. He’s mostly in there with another point guard or Roy, meaning he’s getting the ball passed to him to score. He’s not ready to run this team but he’s doing a good job of what he’s asked. He’s got a very pretty jumpshot that hasn’t been utilized much so far this season and the ability to be around a 38-40% 3p shooter.
You’re trying to compare him to Brandon Roy as rookies… You’re really going to compare a 1 year college student in a strange situation coming into extremely limited minutes to a 4 year college student with abnormally high BBIQ and understanding of fundamentals who received significant playing time?
Bayless gets little playing time and makes a lot more rookie mistakes because of it. If you can’t see the potential there though it really makes me wonder if you’ve even watched him or just look at numbers.
by Bskey on Jan 13, 2009 6:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
no, he's just a cynic and a contrarion
and he makes good points. I happen to disagree with his conclusion, though, because I think Bayless can learn how to play his role once he gets a little more mature mentally. Give him 2 years like Sergio got and we’ll have a truly ballin’ starting PG.
by kickbrass on Jan 13, 2009 9:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't call him names like "ball hog"
But it is true that this is his first time in a situation where his teammates are as good as him so he has to be more of a rounded player. And where his opponents are as good as him, so he has to work harder. The basket must look a lot smaller than it used to. But I have confidence in him.
by Kaboomm on Jan 13, 2009 2:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Summer League
The players were arguably just as good as him. A lot of the guys are now doing better in the NBA than he is. Bayless is simply a shoot first player and always will be. (Similar to AI. The guy gets a lot of assists, but he’d still rather be shooting the bal.)
by Zaig on Jan 14, 2009 1:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So...
Sergio will become a better shooter “just because he will”, but Bayless, who is years younger, more athletic, and a much harder worker, is a finished product?
That makes sense.
No, you’re right, the rookie is what he is always going to be. The 3rd year player who hasn’t improve in 3 years is the guy just waiting to bust out.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 14, 2009 2:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Freud
The 3rd year player who hasn’t improve in 3 years is the guy just waiting to bust out.
by Norsktroll on Jan 14, 2009 2:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're so filthy
I should also add that I still like Sergio as the first PG off the bench, and that Bayless is not better at being a PG at this current point in time and space and the universe.
I just dislike the dismissing of Bayless, as a 20 year old, while using the same logic to believe Sergio will become Steve Nash.
Making it Bayless vs Sergio is silly to me, and is just people wanting to pick a fight. Or… finding someone to blame for why Sergio doesn’t always play that much, like last year. The answer has almost always been… Sergio.
(nods head meaningfully)
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 14, 2009 2:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
(nods head meaningfully and agreeingly – if that is a word)
by Norsktroll on Jan 14, 2009 3:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's not a word...
it’s an adverb. In agreement might also work, but I can totally understand why you have a fear of prepositions. They’re scary and can really bite if not used properly
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on Jan 15, 2009 10:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Adverbs aren't words?
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 10:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not of prepositions. But after 20 years, I'm still scared of gerunds
by Norsktroll on Jan 15, 2009 12:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Norsktroll!
That’s funny! – Elgin
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 16, 2009 11:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
can you HONESTLY contend that sergio has showen NO improvement?
kummon Morty, you could have maid your point with out throwing sergio under the bus. and his point was simply that JUST using summer leage isnt a safe bet either.
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 14, 2009 3:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For 3 years in the league?
He hasn’t grown substantially in any area, and his defense has been more of the just knowing where to be and where not to be, not real actual better man to man defense.
Stuff anyone gets with experience.
His shooting, finishing, playmaking, strength, all have seemingly remained consistent with his rookie year performance— albiet with more experience and more consistency, but even his consistency is inconsistent.
I know he is doing better, but nothing really pops off the stat sheet in an area he really improved in. He just has a much smoother flow to his game and better decision making, which again— everyone gets that with experience.
It’s not the normal big jumps most young guys get between 20-23 or so.
Everyone is different though, and Sergio remains a high potential, intriguing young player. His court vision is amazing. He just really hasn’t improved at the same rate most other young players (especially guards) improve at. He needs to get better at more than just his decision making and defensive knowledge.
I’ve never minded his turnovers, which were always overblown. I mind his continued inability to shoot, no muscle being put on his nice frame, no floater or any other NEW wrinkles in his game.
Even as a backup playing spot minutes, he should be adding new elements to his game.
I don’t want to sound too down on the kid, because I’m really not, but now that I think about it, besides the average experience and comfort one gets after a few years in the league, one can’t really point to anything that he has drastically improved in.
That sorta sucks. I’m not being sarcastic to prove a point, it really does suck. I want Sergio to be better than that.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 14, 2009 3:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you seam fair minded obout sergio,
even as you say he hasnt improved, you admit hes improved. his pathetic shot is the only thing holding him back.
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 14, 2009 4:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not normal amounts of improvement, no
But he is more comfortable now. He APPEARS improved.
But then ya got the same assists, same horrible shooting percentage, no new offensive moves, and all you’re left with is an improvement that comes to anyone after some time in the league.
I was sorta finding my thoughts as I wrote, because I felt like Sergio was doing better, but the more I thought of it… he hadn’t really done that much better.
I dunno.
I can say, my final thought as of now, is that he hasn’t really improved in any of his skills, and some of those skills could only go up. Nor his strength/fitness. He has become more comfortable.
Most young players improve a lot more than that.
I like Sergio, but think he gets a lot of rope and assumptions that he’ll improve, without really improving over a few years. I think most want him to be good, more than actually seeing things that point to him being good.
He’s a tough nut to crack.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 14, 2009 4:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry, i didnt read your adendums
but still, sergio has shown some improvement i would think, and certainly has more room to grow. maybee not as much as bayless, but still. and i do agree, making it sergio vs bayless is kinda lame
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 14, 2009 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio becoming Nash...
Is not going to happen. Nash is a freak, plain and simple.
However, Sergio has shown signs of becoming more like Nash, whereas Bayless seems to try copy AI with his game. Hell, Bayless even mentioned how much he was in awe of being on the court with AI. AI of all people… really?
by Zaig on Jan 15, 2009 11:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nash is a phenomenal shooter
Sergio has not shown signs of becoming more like a phenomenal shooter.
by abdelnaby on Jan 15, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
AI??? are you kidding me?
assists only happen when others make shots..I watched him have a bunch of potential assists…but alot of shots weren’t falling – - when people aren’t shooting well YOU DO IT – - thats his job
He shoots when he is the best option….when no one can get between you and the rim…you are very often the best option..
The team who scores the most points wins – - end of story…
Listen it’s OK to want to see a player play – - good for you. . . no matter how hard you try to convine we other typists out here, things will be what they are…
Sergio through his agent gave the play me or trade me thing . . . .the team will do what they choose, and if he’s creating too much trouble with his unhappiness, he likely will be moved – -
Bayless may learn to pass better – - sergio will never move or elevate like him..no one could stay in front of Jerryd – - -even the NEts crowd had nothing to say…
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 16, 2009 12:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I guarantee you
ANY young NBA player who grew up during AI’s prime is excited to meet AI, and even moreso do a good play against them.
AI is a hall of famer, even though I wouldn’t like him on my team. There’ll never be another guy like AI.
Should a player be faulted for being excited to meet Kobe, Jordan, Shaq, etc? Just because we don’t like them as fans, doesn’t mean a professional basketeer doesn’t greatly admire what those guys have been able to do in their careers.
I didn’t appreciate AI much until the ’04 Olympics, the worst Olympics for basketball in my short lifetime. The worst selection and combination of players since we started using pros, with guys mismatched and not even trying. AI was one of the exceptions, and he played hard every minute and gave his all. I did not expect it from him, and it changed my mind about the guy in many ways.
(I still wouldn’t want him on my team, because aside from a flukie bad year in the East, a team that has him as the focal point will never do anything much because he’s such a volume shooter and bad defender. But he plays hard, plays hurt, takes tons of abuse, and never stops.)
In whatever field of expertise you have made your career in, meeting and being an equal with a legend in that field is a big deal.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 16, 2009 1:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Writing off either player
at this stage in their careers is just stupid. They are both young and inexperienced and are looking to be put in a situation where they can succeed. I think Blazer fans should pull for both of them to succeed rather than have one succeed at the expense of another. Seeing this reminds me of our political system. Members of one party are always trying to see the other party fail so that they seem superior. What we forget is that we are all Americans regardless of party. Sorry to bring up politics again.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 14, 2009 7:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Harder worker?
Bayless should work on being a PG then, that’s where his future is with this team, he should probably try and realize that.
Also, Sergio doubled his practice time after learning he’d been cut from the Spanish team.
You can’t just call Bayless a harder worker because he has a good game face.
by Zaig on Jan 15, 2009 11:03 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Based on every report from the Oregonian
And Barrett, and whoever else.
They complained that Sergio often just goofed around with his friends and didn’t actually work on different elements to his game, when coming in during off hours. Bayless gets in early and stays late, etc.
I’m sure Bayless is working on being a PG. The hard work hasn’t shown yet, but if you take smarts and hard work and athleticism, you get goodness.
The team wanted Sergio to take his workouts more seriously, remember?
I am not anti-Sergio, but when we started this discussion I hadn’t really thought of how little Sergio has added to his game. It surprised me, because I hadn’t really focused on it before besides not being super-high on Sergio for the most part. Right now, he’s a more comfortable version of his rookie season, but compared to last year it’s an improvement.
I would hope he’s just still not working hard before and after practices/games, and not that this is Sergio.
Can you imagine how good Sergio could be if he was just a LITTLE threat to score? It shouldn’t be this hard for a guard to develop some more offense, but he hasn’t yet, and I don’t think ‘not being able to get in the flow’ really applies here.
I just don’t know about Sergio. He had that ‘most appearances in the weight room’ record his rookie year, but his body also hasn’t developed much since then. I don’t expect him to be a muscle man, but being wiry strong would be nice.
I am not at the practices, talking to anyone behind closed doors, etc, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Sergio didn’t like to practice stuff that isn’t fun. That is 100% just a hunch though, and should be deleted from this comment.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 15, 2009 4:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Sergio set a record
last year for workouts in a month? I’m not saying Bayless isn’t a hard worker and it’s not like Sergio’s Rocky Balboa out there, but he isn’t Goofus, either. Maybe that hasn’t stayed constant throughout this year, but he’s definitely put in the effort before. Given that it took Trout like 5 years before he even worked out in the offseason, it’s hard to fault Sergio too much there.
As far as finishing around the rim, while some strength will help, I see it as just one of those things like “court vision” with Sergio, either you can finish around the rim, or you can’t. Manu and Tony Parker are two of the best in the league, and they’re not especially strong, they’ve just been able to do it ever since they got in the league. Bayless will probably have a little of that.
I feel like shooting and defense are the only real areas where Sergio has a legit chance to really improve, and if he can get that done (admittedly the clock is starting to tick more loudly there), then he’ll have a spot on this team for a while. If not, then he’ll end up somewhere else.
by Royster on Jan 15, 2009 4:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Mortimer just say that?
Not sure if you read his post or not. Seriously, he addressed that exact issue.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on Jan 16, 2009 8:46 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Dude you need something to get you out of the house more rather than just
crushing stats and stirrin up crap…Find you a job that pays you to write all this – - you seem to have a passion for expressing very strong opinions – - – If Fox Sports is anything like Fox News, I’d apply there first – - -maybe like Rush Limbaugh needs a sports reporter . . . . .something
Bayless is a remarkable player with an awesome work ethic and attitude
Sergio is a remarkable player with a great work ethic too
So? As long as they both work hard to keep Portland playing its best, they are doing what they are paid for…
Sergi was out again shooting before scouting meeting . . . ALOT… pulling 5, 6 in a row from 3 – - -I watched it . . . .I encouraged him after each one – make or miss -
It’s the fans obligation to support them all as long as they are working at it . . . .
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 16, 2009 12:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dallas would be crazy to do that
I’d love it, and he was in Carlisle’s dog house for a bit, but Bass would probably command more than Sergio straight up. I wonder if the Mavs feel Frye would fit as a backup PF, maybe a Sergio/Frye ackage would work…
Jerryd Bayless = Marlo Stanfield
- Early stage Marlo at this point, but Rex is the emotionless killer new to the game. He will take over, and there will be causalties – it’s just a matter of time.
by blazeraddict on Jan 13, 2009 7:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's the trade I've been lusting for for about 6 weeks. But Rex has to be ready to fly away from the nest for that to work...
Dallas is completely wasting Bass.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
....Speaking of Sergio for Bass straight up...
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
... or toss in Frye, whatever...
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Really? Bayless >>> Sergio?
Someone should tell Nate. He probably missed this in all the practices, games, and game film he watches.
Apparently, his assistants haven’t noticed either, because we know they would tell him.
KP has probably overlooked it, too.
Perhaps Casey can send Nate a memo or something, so he can quit messing around with this Sergio guy. Or maybe Nate has a man-crush on Sergio, and KP is going to have to trade Sergio to get him out of the way.
It’s obvious Nate doesn’t know what he’s doing. Look at all the games we’ve lost.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 12, 2009 11:42 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
True.
Bayless is young and it takes time. Still… Sergio got a boost right off the bat due to the fact that he plays in the second unit with Rudy. I’m not sure what other kinds of strides Sergio can make this year. On the other hand It seems like Bayless has a lot he hasn’t shown us yet.
Really? Bayless >>> Sergio?
Someone should tell Nate.
Tonight no one had to tell him. He chose Bayless over Sergio. I’m willing to bet Sergio will continue to see his minutes slowly decrease as the season goes on.
by Nick Van Excellent on Jan 12, 2009 11:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't disagree with anything you say
I’m extremely high on Bayless, and think he’s a star in the future, part of our Big Four.
And I won’t be surprised if he takes some of Sergio’s minutes, but he might take some of Blake’s.
But I was responding to the OP saying to stop fooling around with Sergio and give Jerryd all of his minutes. Sergio is still, probably, quite a bit better overall than Jerryd. I don’t expect it to last. But the people who can make that call are the people who see them in practice and review game films to see how well they are carrying out what they are supposed to do offensively and defensively, etc.
What strides can Sergio make? Further improvement on D, better 3 point shooting, better mid-range shooting, better ability to score going to the hoop, less time dribbling out front before attacking on offense. Have we seen progress in all of these? Yes, we have. But there could still be more.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 13, 2009 12:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If Ramon Sessions becomes available as the rumors have it (for Conley), I would love to convert Sergio plus other assets into him
At least on the same level as a passer yet with more poise, good defense, great play off picks, also can’t shoot from outside, but much better drives to the hoop. He would be instantly one of the best backups in the league, and could grow into the role as a starter if Bayless doesn’t.
David Thorpe: “Ramon Sessions has terrific court sense and timing. He’s the closest thing I’ve seen to Chris Paul on ball screen action, patiently reading the defenders but ready to make his move (pass, dribble burst, or shoot) in the blink of an eye. His on-court demeanor screams veteran, despite his age.”
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 12:03 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
hey Norsk, what's all the hub hub about Session "not being a restricted free agent"
How is that possible? Wasn’t he the same draft as Channing and friends?
by Bust a Bucket on Jan 13, 2009 12:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He is restricted this summer according to RealGM and ESPN
He should be, or I don’t know what rule applies here. He was picked in the draft in 2007, same year as Greg and Rudy, but since it was (late) in the second round he only gets two guaranteed years. We took Petteri and, yuck, Taurean Green and Demetris Nichols over him. But probably the Bucks didn’t even know if he would be any good, before he started lighting up the d-league.
Maybe the Bucks are afraid they can’t match for him in their current economic situation, and thus would be inclined to give him up to Memphis for Conley. But come on, Conley for Sessions AND Alexander? KP should be able to make a better package than that with a PG replacement, a forward and one or two picks, and offer to take one of their bad contracts off their hands in return so it’s financially attractive. Like I said, I wouldn’t mind to have Gadz on the team for another year who costs too much but isn’t utterly useless like a lot of those oversized contracts.
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 12:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ramon Sessions was selected by the Milwaukee Bucks with the 56th pick in the 2007 NBA Draft.
After that, the Bucks signed Sessions to a two-year, minimum-level contract; thus, he’ll be a restricted free-agent during the upcoming off-season.
Regarding Sessions, I’m unimpressed by his poor mid-range and outside shooting. That applies to Sessions’ mediocre +/- production defensive regarding net points allowed per 100 possessions, too, although his net eFG% allowed looks good compared to defensively inept teammate Luke Ridnour.
All in all, Sessions isn’t someone who I think the Portland Trail Blazers should pursue anytime soon.
by AK1984 on Jan 13, 2009 12:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if you do it later when he is a certified star it will be too late :)
There is always risk involved and I completely agree Sessions is not a shooter, but if we keep Blake I wouldn’t mind a gamble on his backup a la Conley, Sessions,… He brings other things to the table than Bayless, so that is also not a contradiction to keep both ways open: A player more similar to Parker/Arenas/Ellis and a more traditional pass-first point guard. You could say Sergio is the same gamble, but the grass is always greener elsewhere ;-)
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 12:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For the Memphis Grizzlies and the Milwaukee Bucks, I actually like the original rumor here.
FROM MEMPHIS & TO MILWAUKEE
PG Mike Conley, Jr.
FROM MILWAUKEE & TO MEMPHIS
PF Charlie Villanueva
PG Ramon Sessions
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=319532312792&teams=152929&te=&cash=
For Memphis, Villanueva and Sessions are two mediocre starters at power forward and point guard, respectively, who’ll be restricted free-agents after this season; thus, GM Chris Wallace would have an opportunity to evaluate whether to invest in them over the long haul or, perhaps, conclude that youngsters Darrell Arthur and Kyle Lowry are truly worthy as long-term solutions.
For Milwaukee, Conley, Jr. would be acquired as an utter shot in the dark due to his lackluster production thus far and label of being a possible bust. Because Villanueva and Sessions will become restricted free-agents during the upcoming off-season, it also makes financial sense for the Bucks to move them for a guy with supposed potential who’s still got a few years left on his relatively cheap, cost-effective rookie deal.
by AK1984 on Jan 13, 2009 1:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Subsequently, the Bucks could replace Villanueva lost production by making this trade.
FROM MILWAUKEE & TO OKLAHOMA CITY
SG Damon Jones ($4,460,186)
Cash Considerations ($3,000,000)
FROM OKLAHOMA CITY & TO MILWAUKEE
PF Joe Smith ($4,795,000)
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=406788&teams=2515&te=&cash=25:15
Members of the Professional Basketball Club, LLC could surely use some extra cash now.
by AK1984 on Jan 13, 2009 1:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Draft for PG's
I’m starting to <3 a lot of the PG’s in this upcoming years NBA draft.
by as11osu on Jan 13, 2009 12:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Anyone else have an unhealthy crush
on Darren Collison?
He’s an elite defender of quick PG’s and is able to play suffocating D for long stretches. He has had a deadly 3 point shot for multiple years now and is a capable game manager. His speed and more importantly his quickness is more than NBA caliber, and we get each of the bonus areas we’ll need for our PG of the future.
And with this years crop of PG’s, there is a chance he could be sitting on the board when we pick.
by as11osu on Jan 13, 2009 1:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
doesn't he have a ridiculous streak of FT makes as well?
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Jan 13, 2009 1:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He actually missed one the other night...
He’s only a 94% FT shooter now.
by as11osu on Jan 13, 2009 1:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Looks interesting. He could realistically fall in our draft range
The Blazers were also fairly high on Nic’s countryman Rodrigue Beaubois last year during workouts, who is a year younger. How many PG prospects can we stash away ;-)
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 1:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Collison's one of the variety that you don't need to stash
He’s just a tad younger than Sergio, and has an NBA ready game. He IMO is the better version of Mario Chalmers. Of course, we found a way to pass on him multiple times, so maybe that’s not exactly what we’re looking for. You can hope and pray that J-Bay is Monta Ellis/Leandro Barbosa, but isn’t the better fit the guy that plays elite defense, runs a team competently and has an excellent three point shot?
by as11osu on Jan 13, 2009 1:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless
As much as we would all love to revel in the promises that Bayless possesses it is absolutely stupid to assume that Bayless is more ready for NBA basketball than Sergio. Making that kind of comparison is asking for trouble, and anybody with half a brain could tell you that, which is why Nate only plays him when it doesn’t matter.
by cchellis on Jan 13, 2009 1:12 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
+1
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 13, 2009 1:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Care to revise your comment after tonight's game?
by upper left corner on Jan 16, 2009 12:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
aaahhh
your one of those “i told you so kind of guys”. nice
Man, we should forfeit before roy’s hammy explodes, knocking him into LMA’s ear who loses his balance and hits Greg’s knee… - HurraKane212
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 16, 2009 3:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A little bit.......
Yeah, kind of tacky on my part, but I couldn’t resist. A substantial number of people have dogged Bayless pretty hard since summer league. Many seem locked into their position and unwilling to revise it based on his actual play.
I am not saying you fit into that category, but the relentless criticism has irritated me and made me give in to the temptation to indulge in a bit “I told you so,” obnoxiousness. Your use of the terms “absolutely stupid” and “half a brain” left you pretty open to after the fact gloating. Hope to have more constructive conversations in the future :-)
by upper left corner on Jan 16, 2009 8:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
what the hell are you talking about???
MY comment???
Your use of the terms "absolutely stupid" and "half a brain" left you pretty open to after the fact gloating.
people are pist on both sides of the debate. not just you, and the same homerism that your acusing sergio supporters of has been equally displayed by bayless supporters.
Man, we should forfeit before roy’s hammy explodes, knocking him into LMA’s ear who loses his balance and hits Greg’s knee… - HurraKane212
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 16, 2009 9:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, maid tu rek
I was referring to the original comment, and did not realize that the more recent comment had been made by someone else. My apologies. Peace brother.
by upper left corner on Jan 16, 2009 10:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The tone of that comment kind of asked for it.
Bayless vindicated his half brain last night. I’m lucky and only use like maybe 2% of mine. I have a really big head though.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on Jan 16, 2009 8:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Blake once again has
a great game that goes unappreciated. He scores 16 points, hits 4 threes, dishes 10 assists, 3 steals, and slows down the opposing PG again. Notice the games that Rondo, Billups, Stuckey, Paul, and now Rose twice didn’t have against him? He has quietly become one of the better PGs in the league, and a great match w/ Roy and Oden. Yeah, he’s pretty weak at creating his own shot, but that’s not too important. With Blake playing this well, we have lots of time to develop Bayless and/or Sergio.
by crakarjack on Jan 13, 2009 2:23 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
No lie!!
Blake had a terrific game and it barely gets mentioned. He has improved a lot this year some of which can be attributed to Nate’s urging him to expand his game by being more aggressive with the ball.
Brandon Roy just destroyed everything in his path. There's your rational analysis -- Dave
by TwoDeep on Jan 13, 2009 6:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Blake has been awesome
And really, he hasn’t even really been quietly awesome, where you gotta watch the games to see how good he has been (like with Joel, whose numbers are decent but don’t tell the whole story). Even a casual observer just glancing at the stats can see how good Blake has been, and he still doesn’t get enough credit!
I mean, even in FANTASY, which totally just goes by stats, Yahoo has Blake currently rated in the top FIFTY out of the entire league. Even if one loved Blake, who could imagine his raw numbers being so good?
The best part is that aside from his FT%, his percentages are pretty much the same as every other year he played under Nate, so we can expect the good shooting to continue without worrying he’s just on an extended hot streak.
He still has his limitations that makes most of us look to the future too much and ignore how great he has been, but his play has been integral to our success, on par with Joel’s and often moreso.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 13, 2009 9:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ya
if blake can keep it up….i don’t see why we would need to bring in an upgrade at pg. it’d be nice to have an upgrade, but it’s not necessarily a need at this point. the thing is…can he keep it up? he started out the season really slow and it was painful at times, but he’s looking pretty solid now.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 11:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think comparing Blake and Joel makes sense. Both have consistently gotten better
long after they were supposed to have topped out. And they play good gritty ball, nothing flashy. Blake handled both Rose and Paul well this year, two times each. That’s not coincidence.
by raoulduke on Jan 14, 2009 12:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ya
both of their improvements were an unexpected surprise as they are the “elder” members of the team. i think its crazy how pryz didn’t gradually get better on offense…but he became effing phenomenal during some possessions. It’s pretty amazing considering he couldnt even catch passes that would have led to automatic scores last year.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 14, 2009 12:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Blakie was also coming off an injury, 'member
He shook off the rust and has been pretty solid since then.
It’s a pretty telling sign when it seems like we don’t have as easy of a time winning (if we win at all) when Blake isn’t hitting his jumpers or struggling otherwise. It tells me that Blake’s success is a big part of our overall team success, and that we still have a ways to go to be an elite team if we are so reliant on our 5th/6th best player being on every night for us to win.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 14, 2009 2:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
the same could be said about jj last year
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 14, 2009 3:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Upgrade???
who? really….who? Maybe right now we don’t have a superstar, but when you have Roy, Blake, Rudy Rex, Sergio what in the world is missing – - if ones not doing it – - – -try another. . . .each brings their own thing to it
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 16, 2009 1:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i said we don't need an upgrade
an upgrade is always nice…but we dont NEED one. with the potential we have in that position i am pretty comfortable with the status quo.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 16, 2009 7:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sorry . . .is just the trade stuff getts me sometimes
like people are ready to off load their superstars…and give them to us…
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 17, 2009 9:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wish Sergio was as good as Jason Williams.
To think that used to be an insulting thing, I thought. I hated the comparisons, because I always considered Jason Williams a horribly overrated guard.
But, J-Will could shoot, albiet stupidly sometimes. I have decided it’d be awesome if we really did have a J-Will clone as a tempo-changing backup!
As far as Sergio goes… tonight wasn’t his best night; a ton of pounding the ball into the floor. At his best, he’s still not even half the player Jason Williams was. Obviously he is a good passer, but he’s such a non-threat to score, or defensively, that there is no team he can be a starter for. There is no “Freeing Sergio”, because he’s not good enough at what he IS good at to make up for the rest of his game.
I like him as a backup, but I don’t think he’d be anything more for any team in the league right now, and his complete lack of a jumper doesn’t even enable him to fit D’Antoni ball, where the PG has to be a threat to score.
His limitations are what holds him back, not Nate.
He is young and players improve their shooting all the time. His shot is broke again, but hopefully it can be fixed. We can’t anoint Bayless the next big thing after a few just-ok games, but we can be happy he had some just-ok games because he’s a rookie.
I still blame Sergio for not being able to shoot, not knowing when to shoot or when to pass, and for his tendency to dribble the ball for 20 seconds before passing the ball off. That ain’t Nate. Sergio is free to run as much as he can push the tempo.
I compare Sergio to a streak shooter in a way, where you give him a ‘heat check’ of sorts to see if he is on and can be a game changer with his passing and pace, because if he isn’t, ya can’t really use him. If Juan Dixon ain’t going 7 for 10, there is no reason to play him, and if Sergio is having a run like tonight where he can’t get any offense going for anyone, there’s no reason to play him.
I don’t want Bayless force fed any minutes, I want him to earn them. Sergio is our backup and deserves to be the first PG off the bench. I just believe that there isn’t much reason to play Sergio when he doesn’t have his juice brewing, because he is so limited— and those same limitations would follow him anywhere right now, and are not caused by Nate.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 13, 2009 2:41 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Good points
I have said for a while that Jason Williams is now rather Sergio’s upside than his most likely outcome. And that’s not bashing him, Williams got a ring surrounded by the right guys after all. Sergio’s stellar stats have also come down to earth as the season progresses. Guess who is back in the top 20 in PG PER: Steve Blake. And now the guys on top of the list make sense and are players that get a lot of minutes. PG TS%: #11 Steve Blake. Assists to turnovers among all players: #9 Steve Blake. Even in the AP48M category that really loves Sergio he has fallen back to #8, which is still great but more accurate than previous standings.
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 2:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
As I noted in one of my above posts within this thread, Raul Lopez is Sergio Rodriguez's most ...
likely outcome as a player in the NBA; therefore, rather than keep the “Spanish Chocolate” moniker, Rodriguez’s nickname should be changed to “Spanish Washout II” in honor of his aforementioned countryman.
After Rodriguez finishes up his rookie contract, I fully expect him to leave the NBA and return to Spain.
by AK1984 on Jan 13, 2009 3:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, he is still very close to Williams in his third year (except for the minutes) and a more consistent passer
Shooting stats are almost identical: http://www.basketball-reference.com/fc/tiny.cgi?id=GusWY
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 3:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And so it goes.
We have 4 rookiies, 6 second year players, one starter who hasn’t started, and we’re 23-14. So we argue about our point guard, or our SF (even though our starter hasn’t started), yet our PG has had some pretty solid games lately – in the context of the total team.
So now, we wonder about our 3rd year back up vs our 20year old rookie, grab our crystal balls, and try to see into the future. And of course, the rookie hasn’t played very much because he’s the 5th guard off the bench, and the 3rd year back up has yet to show that he can fit alongside Roy on the 1st unit – because he needs as better shot and Roy likes to distribute the ball some of the time – whereas the 3rd year player wants to distribute it all of the time.
Sounds to me like we already know what we need to know. Sergio might have a future on a team that doesn’t have a Roy or a James, but will never start on one that does unless he changes his game – and that’s not the Blazers fault, the coaches fault, nor Bayless’s fault. It’s the nature of the team we have. And the coaches job is to play the team he has and play to their strengths.
Bayless may have a future on the Blazers – precisely because they do have Roy. But, he needs time to both play and develop. And like the 6 third year players we have right now, he might not really come into his own for another year or two.
At this point though, we are starting to see him get a handful of minutes here and there, whereas earlier, he wasn’t getting any.
We know very well, that we will continue to fine tune some of the positions on this team, and that the character and style is not being set by Blake, Sergio or Bayless, but by Roy, Aldridge, and Oden/Pryz. The starting PG and SF will always be complementary to those players, and Webster needs to play, and Batum to back him up. Fernandez and Outlaw, in turn, will always be our go to off the bench players – at least for some time, because they can give us a lift in some of the games, and win some for us from those spots.
And the PG – let’s face it. Blake has adjusted to Roy, and Roy to Blake. So, we’re getting better performance out of those spots this year than last, which is why, along with better over-all play by Aldridge and at the center spot, and more lift off the bench, we’re winning more games.
For Sergio to stay – he’ll have to change his game to adjust to Roy. And if he doesn’t, then yes, eventually he’ll likely go somewhere else to a team that wants a distributor, not a combo guard to play opposite Roy. And that’s the way it is. We need a combo guard, not a pure distributor. Maybe Bayless can be that player. Obviously, KP thought so. and likely, still does But keep in mind, we didn’t just trade Jack because of Bayless. We traded him because of “Fernandez and Bayless”. Big difference. Fernandez, after all, is the third guard off the bench getting Jack’s minutes.
And so it goes.
by Eben Calder on Jan 13, 2009 5:59 AM PST reply actions 10 recs
Very smart post. Rec'd.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 13, 2009 9:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree with you
The best future for Sergio is to be traded as soon as possible, and I would say that this will be the best also for Portland, as Bayless will have more minutes to develop. Definitely, Sergio has to be traded, but will Portland find a good trade for the team involving him?
Free Sergio!
by ABSF on Jan 13, 2009 10:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That is only best for Portland
if Bayless is ready to step in as the backup PG. That is hardly proven conclusively by events on the court. We’ll see how Nate plays it over the next 5-10 games and that will tell us a lot more.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 13, 2009 11:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would argue this as well
things are as they are and no amount of freaking out over Sergio will change his game and his role.
Very well thought out
Sophia
Though patience be a tired mare, yet she will plod. - William Shakespeare
"He should have his face
shaved into the back of his head.. Then there would be no escape" OutlawisRejector on what Bayless' next haircut ought to be...
by BlazerFan1 on Jan 13, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The interesting question then
is Sergio the backup PG for this team?
He’s well-suited to the role; he meshes well with Rudy, and he’s a change of pace.
Bayless doesn’t mesh well with Rudy at this point, if for no other reason than he’s more of a scorer than a passer.
I see the following scenarios long-term:
1) Blazers acquire a starting PG from somewhere else (say, Kirk Hinrich). If this happens, either Blake or Sergio are probably gone; depending on who we get. Blake duplicates Kirk, but with less defense; Sergio is a change of pace. Bayless may stay, if he does its in a scoring role, not as a primary backup PG.
2) Bayless becomes the starter. I don’t think KP drafted him hoping to be the backup; this is where I think Pritchard wants to be long term. Bayless has a lot more potential than either Rodriguez or Blake, but will he live up to it? In this scenario, one of Blake or Sergio probably leaves—we don’t have enough minutes to utilize both of them with Bayless getting starters’ minutes; they will have more value in trade.
3) Blake remains the starter for the forseeable future. He plays well with Roy, is an adequate but not great defender. Bayless and Sergio continue to battle it out; but either one is expendable in this situation. Bayless may be the odd guy out, if he can’t beat out Blake given experience, then he may not be a good fit in the backup role.
In short, I think that long term, Bayless is the starter or bust; Sergio’s best shot with this team is as a backup; and Blake will fill whatever role we need admirably.
by EngineerScotty on Jan 13, 2009 5:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There is no real backup pg role
Sergio’s role has been limited lately…partly due to the fact that he hasn’t been playing as well as he has earlier in the year. Everyone including Nate said that Sergio needed to be more aggressive in penetrating and looking for his own shot. He has done that…but it has been coming at the expense of his playmaking. Also…the “white unit” has not been used much lately. It’s basically just Trout and Rudy as the bench now.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio will be the odd man out
And I’d say it has more to do with his total lack of defense than anything he does on offense.
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 13, 2009 6:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The thing with Sergio is that he seems to have the quickness to be a good
defender at the PG position…. but he’s so wildly inconsistent, it makes you think he just doesn’t have “it.”
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 7:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This statement simply isn't backed up by the stats this year
Sergio has been our best defender at the PG position, and probably our 2nd best defender of all our guards. Time to stop throwing last years arguments into this years posts. Pay attention please.
by as11osu on Jan 13, 2009 10:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
can you back up stats for your own statement?
this would be helpful… but then again, all of our guards have sub-average defense – it’s inconsistent at best…. i actually think blake is better than sergio on defense…. i need to see more of bayless, but from my initial impressions, he’s taken some tougher assignments recently and has done much better than sergio…. sorry, but most of the time sergio can’t stay in front of his man…. the scouting report for him on offense, “let him shoot.”
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 10:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He uses opponent PER and opponent eFG%
which don’t take into account the opponent. Blake faces the starting point guards…
Defense is not measurable by statistics.
by Cablinasian on Jan 13, 2009 11:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not to mention
Not to mention that the better defenders cover the better players… who naturally have the better stats.
by danielfarrell on Jan 13, 2009 11:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio
did a fine job against D Williams in the preseason and against CP3….actually both Blake and Sergio did good against CP3. Even Nash didn’t have a big game against us.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nate has gone out of his way 2 or 3 times
this year complimenting Sergios defense…and not once has he said the same thing about Blake…even if he has been better its only marginal tho and nothing really to preach about however.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 13, 2009 6:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol he's trying to motivate him
But yeah Blake’s defense is equally bad
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2009 9:05 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He's complimented Blake
After holding Nash down, for one, and against Paul and Rose too I believe.
Blake isn’t all-world, but he’s decent and at least knows where to be. His athleticism will always limit him, but he can do, just like on offense, a serviceable job because of his experience.
I’d say Blake is quite a bit better defender than Sergio, is a smarter (or, just more experienced) defender than Bayless, but Bayless will ultimately be a pretty good defender.
Nate knows he’s gotta be nice sometimes, so he’ll give Sergio a compliment, and he’s being tougher on Blake to get more out of him. He’s complimented his defense a few times though, but follows it with a “but what’s what we expect from him” because he’s holding Blake to a higher standard.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 16, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're not serious. You can't be.
Sergio gets burned nonstop. I’m sorry but you’re just wrong. I don’t really know of a good defensive stat to give you, but I have two eyes.
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2009 9:05 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Burned by quicker guards, overpowered by bigger ones to be accurate
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 14, 2009 9:06 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Umm yeah
You also have selective memory. Just like everyone else does.
Bayless has gotten punked plenty of times on defense too, but you choose to remember his good plays instead.
Sergio has had good defensive plays/games (3 steals in 8 mins) but you choose to remember when he gets punked.
by Zaig on Jan 14, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ive been noticing this alot lately
outlaw and sergio both seam to suffer from fans selective memory
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 14, 2009 2:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
people are just realizing this now?
After watching j-bay in college and the summer league, we all knew it was only a matter of time. Sergio has just been filling in minutes as we waited for bayless to find his form. The time is coming.
Hasta luego Sergio.
"Great Oden's raven!" - Ron Burgandy
by danevan on Jan 13, 2009 10:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
The Blazers probably should have 2 pure PGs on the roster.
Right now, that’s Sergio and Blake; with Bayless a tweener, and Roy a combo guard.
I could see either of Sergio and Blake being moved eventually (though probably not both); though I’m not in a hurry to get rid of either one.
Sergio probably would benefit most from a trade to NY; outside of David Lee (or NRob), the Knicks don’t have much that I would want; and Lee is probably too good to be a backup.
Captain Kirk, when healthy and motivated, is an upgrade over Blake, though not a huge upgrade that I’d break the bank to get him.
I still think that long-term, we may see Bayless starting alongside Roy—having a tweener and a combo guard is an interesting and useful proposition.
by EngineerScotty on Jan 13, 2009 10:59 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Kirk is a huge defensive upgrade over Blake.
by Cablinasian on Jan 13, 2009 11:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
definitely an upgrade but I dunno by how much.
I’m more comfortable with Blake than I was last year, but the lack of D really worries/frustrates me.
Catalina-Wine-Mixer.
by ArbyOSU on Jan 13, 2009 1:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Both really good guards
We are lucky to be in this situation because most teams would love to have either of these guys. Nice plays indeed.
Bayless brings more to the table in the Blazers system. He brings toughness and intensity. Sergio is not a good fit in Portland. He may go on to do some big things in the league but it’s not with Portland, not with Nate here and Nate is here for liiiiiiiiiiife.
Bayless’s time is now.
Upper left corner – I agree 100%
by JRRIDER on Jan 13, 2009 11:41 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Mentioned before
It’s pretty easy to get tough and intense when you know you’re only playing half the games and 8 mintues on average in those games. If Bayless was playing 15 minutes a game for 82 games, he’d lose a lot of that simply because you cannot keep it up.
by Zaig on Jan 13, 2009 12:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There is only one way to settle this....
Mortal Kombat!
(Photoshop and/or FinalCut gurus, here’s your opportunity!)
by EngineerScotty on Jan 13, 2009 11:43 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Bayless
I like both guards. When sergio is clicking, he’s definitely valuable. But I think Bayless should be getting some semblance of regular minutes only because he really is the only other slasher other than Roy. All our other guards bail out their defenders by taking jumpers or passing the ball. Bayless won’t be able to figure out how to effectively attack defenses by sitting on the bench. I really don’t even need him to pass hte ball all that much, although he has shown the ability to the pass the ball. One thing that he does that i dont’ like is hte jump-pass. That needs to stop. I think he’s got a decent mid range jumper too. He’s an attacking guard, and we need that. And I love that raw emotion. Haha, i get excited just be seeing him so excited.
by ssa400 on Jan 13, 2009 12:31 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Man! I missed something
I monitor this site pretty closely. Which Blazer official made the announcement that Bayless time had officially arrived? Nate? KP? So much information, so little time…
Spanish Main: The point of departure for enormous wealth in the form of gold, silver, gems, spices, hardwoods, hides, alley-oops, assists and three pointers.
by LaughingJon on Jan 13, 2009 12:47 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Roy has spoken
At the beginning of the season, Roy said something like “I like Bayless for our team”. Has he said similar of sergio?
by by on Jan 13, 2009 1:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
good point...
how many teams would let the MVP of summer league ride the bench like we used to do? (and might still do)
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 13, 2009 1:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But bellinelli sucks
Difference, you know. :)
I seem to remember Qyntel tearing up summer league once, drawing comparisons to Scottie Pippen. Nowadays, he only draws comparisons to Michael Vick.
by EngineerScotty on Jan 13, 2009 1:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nellieland disagrees
http://www.blazersedge.com/2009/1/7/711361/rudy-or-belinelli
http://www.goldenstateofmind.com/2009/1/3/708375/rambo-or-rudy
by Norsktroll on Jan 13, 2009 1:37 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you should post that second poll on BE and see what we all think
I’m guessing it goes the other way pretty strongly
"Great Oden's raven!" - Ron Burgandy
by danevan on Jan 13, 2009 1:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nellieland wouldn't know good basketball
if it whipped them by forty points in Oracle Arena.
The amount of worship laid at the feet of guys like BD (they deserve him back) and SJax by the GSoM crowd is astounding. It shocks me that the Warriors haven’t given Bonzi a contract.
I hereby sentence them to replacement a decade of Bob Whitsitt as their GM, followed by a couple years of Patterson and Nash.
by EngineerScotty on Jan 13, 2009 2:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Of course,
Trader Bob would be an upgrade over what they have now…
instead of outright sucking and jockeying for ping-pong balls, they’d instead be good enough to get crushed in the playoffs, and having a pick in the 20s to spend on whichever player drops out of the lottery due to too many priors on his rapsheet.
by EngineerScotty on Jan 13, 2009 2:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Adam Morrison was good in college, why didn't we draft him?
The summer league is just like the D-League. Putting up 25-30 points a game doesn’t mean anything.
by Zaig on Jan 13, 2009 2:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why did Adam Morrison fail?
(or, more accurately, why IS Ammo failing?)
None of the reasons Morrison is bad at basketball apply to Bayless. Very unathletic, slow, small, weak, horrible defender, and not a good shooter who can’t create his own shot. That sounds exactly like Bayless, right?
Just because one good college player sucks in the NBA (for very obvious reasons that many predicted before Ammo got drafted), doesn’t mean you can’t trust college stats to predict NBA success. You just have to factor in other attributes— athleticism, size, team fit, etc.
Kevin Love won’t be as good as he was in college either. Too small, too slow— never a good combo.
Bayless is as athletic as they come, even for the NBA. He’s got the tools, and comparing him to Adam Morrison is intentionally misleading, and makes no sense in an argument against Bayless.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 13, 2009 3:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Missed the point
Hyping someone because of their summer league or college play is silly. That’s where the Bayless hype has come from so far.
by Zaig on Jan 14, 2009 2:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Or
That he did what he did in college as a freshman, is extremely athletic, extremely hard working, and extremely young. Plus, with a big body that isn’t even done filling out. Maybe THOSE are where the hype came from, even before summer league?
By comparing him to Adam Morrison, you are missing the point, and making your mind up about a kid who can’t even drink yet. That is, to put it harshly, very dumb.
You can judge a player based on how they played in the past, and based on every other NBA player in the league, you can use NCAA to predict that player being able to do that in the NBA— not every time, but it’s a safe bet, depending on how athletic/big the player is and other variables. To say “well Jonny Bustenheimer didn’t do good in the NBA and HE was good in college!” is dumb— especially because they are different positions, different players, hell, Ammo played in a weak ass conference even.
Bayless is so young, he could become any sort of player in the world right now. Sergio is young too and could improve, but he doesn’t have the raw goods Bayless has.
Where does the Sergio hype come from? Potential. Has he ever played as well before the NBA, in international ball or against other reputable competition, as Bayless did in the Pac-10 and summer league as a teenager? No, Sergio never has. We drafted him based on potential, he survives in the NBA based on potential.
What has he accomplished that is ANYTHING better than what Bayless did before the NBA? I could say at least Bayless has accomplishments one could hype, whereas Sergio has yet to accomplish anything hypeable besides a decent assists per 48 stat.
I like Sergio. You just can’t play the “what has Bayless done to make you think he’ll be good” game and at the same time pimp up Sergio.
It’s not an either/or game. Both are young and can be good. I get annoyed with hypocritical analysis just to make your own guy look better, when I think it’s a lil’ better to be a lil’ more consistent.
Neither Bayless or Sergio have done anything in the NBA worth squat, so it’s all just potential.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 14, 2009 2:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Potential
Bayless has shown potential to be a good SG.
Sergio has shown potential to be a good PG.
Portland wants a PG.
In my view, Bayless didn’t have a good summer league. We drafted him to be a PG, not a guy who gets more turnovers than assists. His “accomplishments” are not hypeable.
As soon as Bayless shows some shred of willingness to be a PG, I will jump on the bandwagon.
And you obviously didn’t do well on your analogies during the SATs if you fail to see the AM comparison.
by Zaig on Jan 15, 2009 11:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
WHY I NEVER
I DID SO GOOD ON MY SATS HOW DARE YOU.
That was one of the lamest “put downs” I’ve read on the inter-webs.
Dude, fine, Bayless is very similar to Ammo, it’s impossible to count the limitless ways they are following the same career paths. Ok no I thought about it again, Adam Morrison is an incredibly stupid comparison.
I’m sorry, that is undefendable. Using Ammo as a warning sign for Bayless is ridiculous.
Not liking Bayless is perfectly fine, of course. And Portland doesn’t want a PG, Portland wants someone who can guard PGs.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 15, 2009 4:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why then?
Not liking Bayless is perfectly fine, of course. And Portland doesn’t want a PG, Portland wants someone who can guard PGs.
If this is true, why did we draft a guy that stunk on defense in college?
by as11osu on Jan 15, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps
because not everyone thought he was as bad as you do, but more perhaps because they saw the physical tools and the work ethic necessary to be a great defender.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If only you had been there to advise KP on defensive scouting...
The disaster that is Bayless could have been averted.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
by KP Corleone on Jan 16, 2009 10:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ammo and B-Rex...
Both play basketball.
They both spent time in college.
They both scored more than 18 ppg.
They both made one or more threes.
See, they have everything in common. Anybody who doesn’t think Morrison and Bayless are direct clones of each other, and will follow the exact same career path, is obviously a stupid-head.
I mean, other than the fact that they play different positions, played in very different conferences, came out at vastly different stages of their collegiate careers, have about a ten inch difference in vertical leap, and have games with nothing in common. But, um, those are just insignificant details.
Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.
by KP Corleone on Jan 16, 2009 10:00 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I am a stupid-head
Thanks for the compliment KP.
Let’s see, Bayless is one of the fastest players there is. Morrison – not so much.
Morrison is too slow to play 3, not tough enough to play 4. Bayless showed last night that he at least has some potential at 1 (or whatever flavor of 1 or 2 you want to call it when packaged next to Roy). I guess the jury is still out on his ability to play 2 – but who knows if he will ever get a chance with Rudy, Roy, and the host of others who are capable of playing 2 on this team.
Stupid-heads unite! – Elgin
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 16, 2009 11:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
Hyping someone because of their summer league or college play is silly
People get drafted in the lottery because of their college play. Make millions of dollars on rookie contracts because of their college play.
Teams trade very good players just to acquire the rights to draft players, because of their college play.
College play is a great predictor of NBA performance. Not a perfect predictor, but the best predictor there is.
Add to that Summer League play and extreme athleticism and you’ve got three good predictors. None of them are perfect, but all are good.
On the other side, you have spot minutes in a few games where he hasn’t played well.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 4:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
completely agree..
it’s interesting because the transition to the NBA from either europe or college works differently for everyone – however, if you’re an all-star in college and summer league, that’s a decent indicator for NBA success…. the issue becomes separating the sebastian telfairs from the jameer nelsons, where given 5-6 years in the league, the distance between them finally becomes greater
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 5:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And for that separation
You look at other predictors such as athleticism (edge to Jerryd), court sense (edge to Sergio), defensive awareness (neither are great), personality (depends not just on the individual but also other team personalities), work ethic, overall intelligence, etc.
And then, when you’ve done all that, you look at team needs, now and down the road, make your guess, and trust to luck.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 5:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The strange thing to all this is
that if either one would 1) make shots and 2) not commit turnovers, they would be winning this battle…. this is why steve blake makes a living at this game – he’s not that athletic, but he’s very dependable -
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 6:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I sat down for a few minutes to look this up
how many teams would let the MVP of summer league ride the bench like we used to do? (and might still do)
I was admittedly curious about… For each Summer League MVP, what was their average minutes the following year? And what was that team’s record? (Since it’s easier to get big minutes on a losing team).
I’ve had a heck of a time finding a list. Still looking for a bit. I thought it was a good question.
So far I’ve found Nate, Foye, and Bayless easily but I want to go further back. Didn’t Zach win once?
by Timmay! on Jan 13, 2009 5:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Roy was misquoted
Somebody was suggesting stopping off at the Niketown to buy shoes for the players, and Roy—who is always one to spot a bargain—suggested that to save money, the team stop at Payless Shoe Source instead.
He said, “I like Payless for our team”.
And on numerous occasions, he has expressed his preference for buying jewelry at Jared.
by EngineerScotty on Jan 13, 2009 1:33 PM PST up reply actions 1 recs
I agree
I like Sergio’s game but J Bay Bay is a beast!!! His time is goin to come in March/April when we really gon need him to play like a beast…
"The official GOON for McMillian and co"
by whutupfam on Jan 14, 2009 11:18 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
i'm glad
you are a fan of both…it seems like most people like bayless at the expense of sergio.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 14, 2009 11:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly this 20 year old and this 22 year old
are who they’re going to end up being, enough so that we can make definitive predictions about what they are relative to each other. Because point guards develop the fastest of all ballers.
I actually am a Bayless guy – I think he’s a perfect fit if things work out the way the front office clearly hopes they work out, as kind of like a rich man’s derek fisher, which would be a perfect complement to Roy as kind of a middle class man’s Kobe. But I like Sergio too. I don’t think he has a future here, but if he ends up on the right team, I think he could have a nice career. For his sake, hope that he gets traded to the Knicks.
by howlingfantods on Jan 14, 2009 5:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
i'm glad
that more Pro Bayless and Pro Sergio people are being more vocal lately. It’s frustrating hearing that people want 1 to succeed at the expense of the other. People are seeming to come around lately…even Timbo sorta made the switch.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 14, 2009 7:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like they have about the same shooting skills
Unfortunately.
by baduk on Jan 14, 2009 6:39 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If that indeed proves to be the case, then two things logically follow:
(1) Sergio is a much, much better choice to be playing than Rex, because he is a great passer.
(2) The Blazers are doomed this year unless Blake and Rudy get healthy fast.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 15, 2009 8:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
There really shouldn't be any argument
Both of them at this point in there careers are horrible shooters (instead of a Sergio line from the field – One of Timbo’s suggestions, maybe we should have a Bayrod line around 35% and Bayless has about 20% to go to get to that point) and neither can play a lick of defense. All the Bayless hype is beyond belief especially on the defensive end. Sergio is a better passer and Bayless can kind of (barely from what I have seen so far) finish better at the rim. Neither of them are even close to being ready to start.
At this point we need to let them play, stop comparing them and see what shakes out the balance of the season. At the end of the season maybe we will have a better idea of what we have. Right now spotty at best.
"I saw him in the face" Sergio's quote on the latest alley-oop to Rudy.
by blazermaniac32 on Jan 14, 2009 7:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 14, 2009 7:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hey everyone
just got back from the philly game… and as far as this debate goes, both these guys looked awful. Bayless couldn’t hit a shot. Sergio is like a running back in football where you hope he doesn’t fumble the ball….
To be honest, even after tonight’s game, I stick with my original assessment. Bayless had an off night, but I wasn’t nervous when the ball was in his hands. Every time Sergio had the ball tonight, I was honestly nervous…. I just felt something bad was going to happen… when players make poor plays over a consistent time, this is the feeling you get – you begin to lose trust… that’s whats happening with Sergio – tonight was a prime opportunity for one of them to step up, but neither did…
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 14, 2009 9:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
this post seams all the more credible after tonights game
They LIED!!!
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 15, 2009 12:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Um, you mean the game he just got back from and is talking about???
by El Rojo on Jan 15, 2009 12:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
< /s >
Man, we should forfeit before roy’s hammy explodes, knocking him into LMA’s ear who loses his balance and hits Greg’s knee… - HurraKane212
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 15, 2009 3:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
To be honest, even after tonight’s game, I stick with my original assessment.
At least be honest about it. It doesn’t really matter what happens in these games. Your mind is made up. Your comments in this thread alone about Sergio clearly state that.
When you make really ill informed comments, that even Sergio’s biggest detractors don’t agree with, then its time to stop the charade. Objectivity has ceased to exist in your opinion of Sergio.
by as11osu on Jan 15, 2009 12:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think my comments are ill informed at all... just like everyone's comments here, there is a range for the sake of conversation - some truth in each of them.... i'm not a sergio-hater as some might think, and in fact, I like the guy more and more
as people discuss him here… other notes: i spoke with 2 people from the coaching staff last night, and J- Quick and each did not have a lot of positives for Sergio…. i’ll credit everyone here with one thing: Sergio may be able to run the offense better than Bayless. But this is it. And this isn’t much credit for Sergio, considering he’s been here for 3 years. My OP didn’t address this part, but there it is, +1 for Sergio for running the offense….
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 4:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That does it
Hotstuff is nervous when Sergio has the ball.
That’s the nail in the coffin. Trade him if we can, otherwise just cut him.
;)
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 4:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well,
there is that feeling you have with certain players on a given team, where due to a lack of consistency, you don’t know what’s going to happen – it makes you nervous because players like this tend to put others in an awkward situation -
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 5:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Of course
If KP is nervous, or Nate is nervous, that means a lot.
You? Nothing personal, but I doubt your nervousness (or lack thereof) is going to persuade too many people of anything….
So we’re down to substance, and the Philly game provided nothing of substance except that both of them are fully capable of having a bad game. But then, we knew that….
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 6:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Of course =)
I wasn’t exactly referring to my personal nervousness, but a type of nervousness in basketball where you basically don’t want the ball to go to X person because the mistake factor is elevated – on all the teams i played for during HS and college, there was always “that” guy and scouting reports knew “that” guy
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 6:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Makes sense
Considering per minute Bayless gets more turnovers than Sergio. That’s not even county some of the ridiculous shots that come from Bayless that could be considered turnovers.
by Zaig on Jan 15, 2009 11:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
can you reference this claim with a link?
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 11:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOLOLOLOLOOLOLLOLOLOL
you make me laff sooo hard
Man, we should forfeit before roy’s hammy explodes, knocking him into LMA’s ear who loses his balance and hits Greg’s knee… - HurraKane212
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 15, 2009 11:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't have a bit of faith in either guy, but I'm considered a hater. Actually, though, I'm a realist.
by AK1984 on Jan 15, 2009 6:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Realistically, you're a hater?
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 6:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A realistic hater
Maybe a sub-form of the realistic optimist
by Norsktroll on Jan 15, 2009 7:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And - he's smarter than Michael Jordan
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 15, 2009 10:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's very tricky -
but as pointed out in this thread, Sergio may be a great player in a different system – The bar in Portland is pretty high, as Bayless is learning this.
One assistant last night expressed very strong remarks for Bayless and he wasn’t just trying to pad my surface. This tells me that he’s probably done well enough in practice that the staff feels he needs more opportunity in the game to break the ice – sort’ve like Oden…. Oden’s getting progressively better, in almost a patterned way, and it would be great to see this happen with another player on the squad too
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 6:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Quick article
If it comes down to substance, we have this:
1. Both have a chance to step up until Blake is back. Surprise, surprise.
2. Nate isn’t saying (either because he hasn’t decided or because he isn’t saying) who will start. Surprise again.
3. KP says nothing is likely to happen quickly, he’s still assessing, and probably will be until the summer. Which may mean:
A. KP is still assessing and probably will be until the summer.
B. KP doesn’t want other GMs to know that he is looking to make a move quickly, because they would likely bump up their prices on what they want.
In other words, no real news.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 6:07 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
well,
Quick loves the “gray” area – absolutely loves it. This is why he’s moving this topic because it’s a gray area on the squad, and has some implications for the future.
I wonder what drew KP’s interest to the Tennessee game??
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 6:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus
Really, it’s the only grey area to be settled. The other roles are firmly in place.
So, Quick, as a reporter, has to focus on it. I like Quick, but this isn’t an emergency situation, if Blake is healthy. Both Sergio and Bayless are young and all potential, with neither going and grabbing that backup spot by the neck.
And neither showed one or the other is better for the starting spot, now that Blake is out.
Quick makes it sound so much more urgent than it is.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jan 15, 2009 6:49 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if Blake is out a few weeks until back to full strength, they at least have to decide on one route for the mid-term
Can’t afford to give up an inordinate amount of those “easy” games since the schedule gets harder again later, especially in April
by Norsktroll on Jan 15, 2009 7:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes.
This is what makes it so interesting. The role is wide open right now for anyone to fill – these guys are being given huge opportunities against philly and tonight in NJ – both decent teams which either one could do fine against -
Yes, it’s not emergency, however, when the question comes up in the future about who should play this role, this will be a timeframe they look back upon, so it does have some significance
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 7:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
outside of garbage time
Bayless got 20 minutes of PT and Sergio got 10. Someone was being given an opportunity in the Philly game . . .
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 15, 2009 7:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
No doubt he’s being given more of a chance than he was, not just in the Philly game.
I’m not really in a position to make the call, but it seems like it is early, like he’s being given that chance perhaps before he is really ready. That may be because a trade is being considered, and they want to know how close he is to stepping into a major role.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If that guy owns a jumpshot, it's time for it to start falling...
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 15, 2009 8:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm wondering
if our shooting coach has been rebuilding his jump shot because they didn’t expect him to have significant PT, and that’s part of the problem.
The kid can shoot, he’s proved that over and over. The hoop is the same size in college and Summer League, and he could make it go in.
Maybe he’s just been pressing too hard or something, because we know he can shoot, whatever else he can or can’t do.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know what the problem was. But there was a problem.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 15, 2009 8:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
One factor
Everything is faster in the NBA. Defenses rotate quick, lanes collapse quicker, and man to man coverage is usually quicker. This means you have to shoot the ball quicker on most occasions.
Hopefully Bayless will learn to adapt to this and hopefully he will learn that finding an open man also works.
by Zaig on Jan 15, 2009 11:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The whole game was garbage time.
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 15, 2009 8:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sad but true
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 15, 2009 8:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If he actually went to the Kentucky Tennessee game to check out Meeks
he needs to go to Wake to check out Jeff Teague. That kid is raising some eyebrows too, and he’s actually a point guard.
by as11osu on Jan 15, 2009 10:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jodie Meeks isn't an NBA caliber player, while Patrick Patterson is the only guy who's worth ...
scouting on the Kentucky Wildcats. For the Tennessee Volunteers, Tyler Smith is a so-so combo forward who’s got immense athleticism; however, I’m not too impressed with his overall skill set.
by AK1984 on Jan 15, 2009 12:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ya, I don't like the whole idea of him going to that game.
There are plenty of guys in college this year that could work for us, but none played in that particular game.
by as11osu on Jan 15, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Especially
since we have a whole bunch of draft picks this year, and the second rounders are going to be kind of gambles, maybe on people with immense athleticism or something.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless: 0 assists in 24 minutes last night
Zero. I’m not going to argue all the other stuff, it is so tired, and I feel like people have really hunkered down on their respective sides. I can ignore the 1-11 shooting, but zero assists in 24 minutes? really?
Before garbage time Sergio got 10 minutes in a game without Rudy and missing Blake for 1/2 the game. Clearly, he is on the way out here. Nate has drastically cut his minutes the last 10 games, and even in those minutes, reduced his role on offense. This is what Nate did all last year and now, this year too, people point to his production in that crap situation and say he stinks. Sergio has shown this year what he can do when he is give real time in games and the ball in his hands earlier this season, but it just wasn’t enough to convince Nate. So, that’s that. It hurts me to say it, but at this point, I’d rather see him traded than continue to watch Nate destroy him as a player.
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 15, 2009 6:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Im with you SergioFTW
it’s realy too bad, but Im now on the side of rooting for him to get traded so that he can show what he can do. I truely believe that Nate has ruined Sergio’s career thus far. Its got to be tough to play when you feel like your coach doesnt have trust/like you. Nate can’t see what Sergio does well and can’t fiugre out how to allow him to strive. it’s a lost cause. Good luck Sergio! I hope we send you somewhere before you decide to leave the NBA all together because you do have the ability to make many Blazer fans complain in the future about how we would be better with a PG like you.
Being a Blazer fan is fun!
by Blazermaniac77 on Jan 15, 2009 7:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ya
i want him to go as well as he will never succeed under these circumstances.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 15, 2009 8:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, well
he probably starts tonight and gets significant burn, so you probably wanted to wait to make this declaration for a game or two.
I expect Sergio to have a really good game tonight and play a key role in our win. Bayless will get significant PT, too, after all, we only have 3 guards.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, I'm a reasonable man. But Sergio played 14:45 -- not "10 minutes"... In that time he was 0-for-2 with 2 assists.
Rex was apocalyptically bad offensively, but Sergio didn’t put up hall of fame numbers…
The whole game was “garbage time”…
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 15, 2009 8:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio literally airballed a lay-in last night...
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 8:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
hotstuff revealed
um, no he didn’t. he only had two shot attempts, a 3, and a pull-up 2 that was a 10 foot jumper in the lane. it was a crazy high-arching shot, and it did indeed hit-the-rim.
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 15, 2009 8:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ummm....
whatever it was, the crowd chanted airball afterwards…
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 8:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
way to take responsibility
“it was the crowd, don’t look at me!”
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 15, 2009 8:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes indeed,
sergio is a crowd pleaser in some contexts
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 8:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And both of them
were really active in putting out the garbage.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well, we played poorly all game
but to be fair, I did qualify my statement by saying he played 10 minutes before garbage time. he also played the last 4 minutes of the game. I wasn’t using his time in reference to his production—i was simply quantifying Nate’s choices on playing time in a game where we 1.5 guards injured.
and yeah, you won’t see me anywhere saying he played very well last night or at all recently, and of course, i’m not saying he is hall-of-fame on even his best night.
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 15, 2009 8:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless at least draws fouls - though his shot really was horribly short last night
Sergio hands out “fouls to give”
by Norsktroll on Jan 15, 2009 8:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
32 made free throws
for a guy who doesn’t draw fouls is awesome.
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 15, 2009 8:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed on Sergio
Watching the way Nate “develops” Sergio is the one thing that has consistently frustrated me the last 2 seasons. Things were going good early in the year when Sergio had the confidence of his coach. We were winning during a ridiculous part of the schedule and the 2nd unit led by Sergio was a huge part of that. Now, Bayless is taking Sergio’s minutes and it isn’t because Rex is earning them.
Just trade Sergio already, Nate will never learn adjust the play to fit a guy like Sergio. We will always be a ball control, terrible fastbreaking, halfcourt team under Nate. Sergio doesn’t fit what Nate wants at pg and never will. Watching Sergio adjust his play to try to be a “Nate Mcmillan point guard” is about as painful as watching Trout try to dribble through a full court press. They just shouldnt be doing it, its not their game. I am ready to see Sergio in a different uniform, he will never succeed under Mr. McMillan…
RUDY > MJ
by myemic23 on Jan 15, 2009 9:48 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
So...
if your above assumptions are true, would it be better to part with Nate than Sergio under these circumstances??
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 10:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
unfortunatly no,
nates good is bigger then his bad, and who do we go get anyways
Man, we should forfeit before roy’s hammy explodes, knocking him into LMA’s ear who loses his balance and hits Greg’s knee… - HurraKane212
http://www.nba.com/news/miles_10_080919.html
by maid tu rek on Jan 15, 2009 11:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
Nate works too well with everyone else. Nate has already chosen Bayless and unless Sergio goes off during Blake’s absence, everyone else is with him.
Look for Przybilla’s new found offense to be gone once Sergio leaves, even when his arm heals.
by Zaig on Jan 15, 2009 11:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You don't fire a successful coach over a backup point guard....
If Nate ever gets fired, it will be for other flaws in his coaching. We still don’t know how does with a team that is supposed to win it all. He may be fantastic getting a team out of the gutter, but we just don’t know how he will do with one of the top teams in the league. I suspect he will do just fine, but we need to get him a point that plays his way and does it the second the strap up for the blazers. I have zero confidence in his ability to develop point guards…
RUDY > MJ
by myemic23 on Jan 15, 2009 3:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hotstuff's Update is a sham
I encourage people to read the article instead of Hotstuff’s summary of his convo with “important” people. The article is actually very pro-Sergio, pointing out the way he has been used lately is useless and hasn’t allowed him to earn anything. Of course, Hotstuff is stridently attempting to make it seem like everyone who is smart agrees with him, despite the fact that nothing seems to back it up except for his somehow very confessional conversation with our teams coaches (yes, it is as ridiculous as it sounds). From the article:
If Rodriguez turns out to be better, then either commit to him and stop yo-yoing his minutes with Bayless, or use his improved portfolio to get some value for him in a trade.
Otherwise, the likable and talented Rodriguez is just rotting here in Portland.
And who’s to say the long-term answer isn’t Rodriguez and Bayless, with Blake out of the picture? Who knows? It’s time for the franchise to make a definitive move and start figuring it out, because as it was before Blake’s injury, nobody was finding anything out in the limited time Rodriguez and Bayless were playing.
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 15, 2009 7:25 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Maybe you've misunderstood me -
I’m a fan of this site, and the blazers, and like to see the best brand of basketball out there. I posted this for a conservation not attempting to get everyone to agree with me. It’s fine to disagree, but I’m just relaying info as I’ve received it… if this bothers you, I can’t help that -
So, for all the pro-Sergio people, how many minutes/game does he need to strive and prove all the talent that is claimed here? What other conditions are necesary for his success?
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 7:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It would help a lot for you to explain
how a fan attending a game ends up of having amazingly candid conversations with coaches of the team who have no problem disparaging a player to a random fan. and since you aren’t media, why wouldn’t you just tell us who you talked to? it’s not like you have to protect your sources to ensure future access.
the fact that the “info” you are relaying just happens to 100% agree with your post and isn’t sourced and comes from what would be an extraordinarily unusual instance is “what bothers me.”
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 15, 2009 7:50 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Well then,
let it bother you – conversations i have with people are sometimes private and should remain there… as per the people themselves, i’ve attended enough games on the east coast to get to know some players’ and coaches family members to have access to different people…. it just so happens to be that the further away from PDX, the smaller the fan base, so players typically are more willing to hang around afterwards (or at the hotel)…
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 8:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
ok, it will continue to bother me
and in the meantime, i’d suggest you take your own advice:
conversations i have with people are sometimes private and should remain there
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."
by sergioFTW on Jan 15, 2009 8:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i think you have a problem with disagreement
… i just drew some conclusions from a set of collected data – disagree if you want, but don’t probe for stuff you ain’t gonna get
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 8:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He talked to LetsBlaze
Perhaps it’s Shav who is blasting Sergio. After all, how many oops has Sergio thrown to Shav?
OK, I admit that I too wondered why in the world a coach would disparage Sergio to anyone who isn’t part of the team setup and wouldn’t treat it in confidence.
So I’ll give you a rec for asking the question. And maybe there is a legit answer to the question, but it’s a legit question.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What coaches and players say off 'tape' is quite a bit...
the game is an emotional roller-coaster, so people obviously tend to say interesting things
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 8:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, they are talking to you during the game?
Better and better….
;)
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
nope - i'm referring to pre and post game - always interesting to hear what mom and dad think of things too
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 8:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
sweet Bayless's parents don't like sergio
wierd
Being a Blazer fan is fun!
by Blazermaniac77 on Jan 15, 2009 10:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
he did talk with the coaches....i saw it...I have the pictures to prove it
didn’t HEAR it….but….
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on Jan 17, 2009 9:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes, you need to know
to whom you are talking.
Folks, we’re talking to hotstuffdb22 here. Anyone remember him? Let me help you (and this is just from his fanposts, forget the comments).
1/2/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/1/2/92614/95687
He drove all the way to the hoop for a wide-open lay-in and air-balled it!!!
Hmm, air-ball layin again.
I think it’s about time to let Sergio go to the D-league and replace him with T. Green in the rotation.
That was a good idea. We all know how successful Taurean was once he got a chance.
1/17/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/1/16/233144/314
Sergio is the odd man out right now.
This guy really can’t play NBA basketball.
We obviously don’t like Sergio.
This guy’s only stats are turnovers.
(I’ve counted 3 airballs by Sergio in the past 3 games – another stat, I guess)
Airballs again….
1/21/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/1/21/185036/882
Sergio had a nice game, which I would term his best so far. So good, that I now believe this guy has potential to make it “big” in this league. Also, credit McMillan for sticking with him. It was really nice to see him have a solid game, all around. I’m happy for him and hope everyone else is too!!!
You mean it would have been a mistake to listen to you before? Or would it be a mistake to listen to you now? I’m so confused. Or, well, maybe I’m not. So anyway, all credit to Nate for sticking with him.
10/4/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/10/4/628310/trade-sergio
This is ridiculous.
Sergio couldn’t play last year and was an embarrasment to the club. All of a sudden, over the summer, this guy makes a miraculous turnaround? McMillan is just feeding the press to make Sergio welcome Rudy well.
Face it. This guy has no potential. At least that’s what Spain thought when selecting their Olympic team. In fact, Sergio would be better off playing in Spain this year, but he knows he wouldn’t find a significant spot on any team.
I said it last year and I’ll say it again: The only reason Sergio is on the squad this year is to help Rudy’s adjustment to America. They’ll travel on planes together and tour cities together. Or perhaps Portland wants a new indoor soccer team and wants to attract some more Europeans to the city. In either case, Sergio is like the Statue of Liberty – a pretty picture of disgrace.
Kevin Pritchard should let him develop in the D-league this year… he’ll get more significant time than riding the pines in Portland again.
The Blazers are no longer a team full of projects. Jack was the last project to go, and now Sergio will follow.
The guy stunck up the court last year and will do the same this year. However, there were some people on this blog that actually supported the guy after his horrible games.
All credit to Nate for — oops.
Some people on this blog actually supported the guy? That’s terrible. Who would do that, Hotstuff?
KP should send a third year player to D-League. Never let facts get in the way of what you want to say.
Oh, wait, maybe Sergio has some potential after all:
10/6/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/10/6/629796/sergio-robert-pack
Does anybody remember Robert Pack? This guy was like the “microwave” – he would ‘heat’ up a lot of stats quickly. Anybody see Sergio in this capacity? He seems to have the spirit and capacity to have short sprints of explosion that could potentially turn a game around.
But wait, I thought Sergio couldn’t play, was an embarrassment and a disgrace? Oh, but perhaps it was his stellar performance in the games between the 4th of October and the 6th of October than changed Hotstuff’s mind.
Sergio and Rudy are the key difference makers in our expected 10-0 start:
10/18/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/10/18/637753/can-the-blazers-go-10-0
I believe there is a tiger roaring inside. It is chained up. Further, I think it will be released in a few weeks against the L*kers. The tiger also will not stop eating its ‘prey’ for at least 10 games.
This tiger is the Portland Trailblazers. Do you think this team can start the season 10-0? Is it too far of a stretch? Will it break your expectations if they do indeed start 10-0?
I think it’s a possibility. If it happens, I personally think it will be due to the second unit. Specifically, the Sergio-Rudy tandem, this pair may be the “eye of the tiger”.
Until the current post:
It’s time for Sergio to pack his bags.
Hotstuff loves Travis
2/12/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/2/12/23152/6799
I love Travis Outlaw. His improvement this year is one of the feel good stories of the Blazers. He shows brilliance in many different ways, and has stopped all of our hearts with his jumpshots more than once.
The guy’s athleticism is incredible. He can sky for dunks or come from nowhere to block a shot.
I think he means it, too.
3/1/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/3/1/82337/12843
In my opinion, the player that has improved the most this year is Travis Outlaw.
Travis Outlaw is having a “breakout” season. He has transitioned from a mediocre player at best, to a threat for opposing teams. He never used to play in the 4th quarter, now he is a key for Blazers winning games down the stretch. His consistency is even improving, more than other players on the team in his same situation.
Really, he likes Travis:
11/6/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/11/6/655168/outlaw-is-gone
I know you may not like this post. But, it’s time for an honest assessment of TO.
OUTLAW HAS REACHED HIS CEILING WITH THIS CLUB.
Travis is impeding the development of the Blazer’s future. His fate and departure are sealed.
Sometimes managements needs to make a decision and move forward.
A decision regarding the future of Travis Outlaw (TO) is needed NOW.
I love TO. But, this guy needs to be shipped out.
Kick him off the island, Pritchard.
Yes, last year Jack was removed.
For the 3 major baskets TO’s hit in the 4th quarter the past 1.5 years, his multiple mistakes have shifted the balance the other direction.
I can’t stand his cock-eyed-high-angle-71.45 degree shooting form that begins with his head facing vertically downward on the floor.
He’s fundamentally both AWKWARD and OFF.
His turnovers are both timely and un-needed.
Further, Outlaw doesn’t play TEAM basketball. I bet Rudy and Roy thinks he’s a ball-hog. He throws up crazy looking shots every game.
He reminds me of the guy who sometimes gets really lucky at key moments, so you hang on to him. However, outside of those key moments, he’s terrible. But, then all of a sudden, another key moment comes, and…… with Outlaw, it’s BRICK.
A good fit for Outlaw would be with Steven Hill in OKC. It’s closer to his hometown, and as we well know, PJ Carlesimo loves brick-shooters that follow the lead of Kevin Durant.
One guarantee: Outlaw will be gone before the All-Star Break.
Who can we get in return?
Or, maybe not. Wow, that shift in assessment was based on four games this year. Well done.
Hotstuff likes our Big Three (he also told us Nic is ROY in this post):
http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/10/17/637196/batum-rookie-of-the-year
Jason Quick thinks Greg Oden will be an all-star this upcoming season (just confirmed on O-live podcast). In addition, assuming Roy repeats his All-Star bid and Aldridge is as dominant as everybody hopes, we’ll have potentially 3 All-Stars in February
Or, less than a month into the season….
11/25/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/11/25/670079/lost-kids-where-can-we-fin
Also, the phrase Big Three shouldn’t be used right now. Let the best players on the team decide who the Big Three are. Right now, the Big Three are Pryzbilla, Roy and either Fernandez or Outlaw… we actually don’t have a Big Three.
(The title of this post said, “The Big 3 Doesn’t Exist”). Oden and Aldridge are “lost kids”.
Until, 8 days later….
12/3/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/12/3/679378/i-was-on-holy-ground-tonig
Greg Oden. I was impressed with the big fella. You can tell the potential is there. He certainly looks better and better each game. He had a few amazing dunks that were worth the price of admission. This guy is phenomenal, even at this point. He had one block bigger than any building in Portland. It was huge. His put back off a Steve Blake miss tasted like a Loss Abbey Yellow Bus – mmmm, so nice.
Aldridge looked good. I liked his effort on defense more than anything else. He had a few clutch plays towards the end. He seems to set-up Roy fairly well. I think he’s sometimes uncertain whether to pass or shoot, which messes a bit with the offensive flow. At the end, we he finally decided to dunk, we were all happy.
Rest of the team – nothing new to comment here – most guys looked pretty tired and this showed on the defensive end… The one player who stood out the most was Outlaw.
Hmm…. Looks like he found his lost kids, and loves Travis again.
But wait, maybe not, for a couple weeks later, those kids must be lost again….
http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/12/20/698320/everyone-wait-the-cart-is
At the end, this is all somewhat like a fairy tale. Until we have a 2nd fiddle, and consistency in other places, expect the highs to be high and the lows to be low.
Indeed, truer words than those last 12 were never spoken or written. The highs will indeed by highs, and the lows will be lows.
Hotstuff has some other interesting hot stuff. Anybody remember this classic?
2/7/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/2/7/73414/80981
Jason Quick points out in this morning’s game article (http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/exclude/1202369101290590.xml&coll=7 ) that Roy left the team to attend to a family emergency in Seattle, and may hinder his status against Detroit.
I’m all for player’s taking brief leaves of absences for family matters. I think in any workplace this should be accepted.
Yet, at the same time, I feel like Roy has done this on multiple occassions before, both this season and last. He’s travelled back to Seattle to take care of family issues, which are none of our business, but seems like it’s adding up to a lot of time away from the team. What’s the balance and how much time should one receive for such an activity? Moreover, what if Roy wasn’t in Portland and didn’t have an easy 3 hour drive to resolve a matter, like most NBA players?
I think it’s great to put family first, I’m all for that. But at the same time, how much time does one get to do this?
Your boss will love this one:
2/29/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/2/29/91333/0910
I love this site, the thought-provoked comments and the constant air of “Rip City” felt here.
I propose a “Blazers Edge Appreciation Day”. This could be annually, semi-annually, quarterly, or whenever. We could all take an “official” day-off from school, or work, or whatever occupies you, and delight in the tradition of the Blazers. Maybe the players on the team would respect it enough to join with us. We would celebrate Dave and Ben’s ability to keep the site going, we could nominate people for different positions, we could forecast predictions, analyze stats, all the things that culminate in this website.
It would just be a day to pause, and celebrate. What do you think?
“Sorry, boss, can’t make it in today, it’s the Bedge Appreciation Day. Didn’t you know?”
Another classic:
3/3/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/3/3/194020/8516
The ultimate question is, who get’s canned first, McMillan or Pritchard?
We should rest the starters. Why burn them out before the summer break? They need rest. After all, it’s going to be a long and tiring summer….
3/31/08 http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/3/31/161746/345
For the remaining games of the season, I think the Blazers BrainTrust should bench some of their current starters (Blake, Pryz, Aldridge) to both prevent injury and allow Sergio, Frye, Jack etc. to play and improve their games.
I mean, what do Blake, Pryz and Aldrige need for these last few games? Rest. That’s the only thing. Why burn them out? Why not let Sergio and Frye play 35+ minutes and try to improve their games.
Hotstuff, love you man. Keep it up. We come here for entertainment, after all.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 10:09 AM PST reply actions 18 recs
Weird
The blockquotes got all messed up on that. Probably the software was rebelling at some of the content.
But most of the text there comes right out of his posts, even though the block quotes make it look like it’s my text.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 10:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
that took a lot of work and dedication. thats a pretty good highlight tape right there.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 15, 2009 10:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not much work
Just click on his name and then click on the Blog tab, and you can read it all for yourself. You can really have an enjoyable few minutes.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 10:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
First of all, Thank You jscot. (+1 rec'd)
I sincerely appreciate this. It might be the best comment I’ve ever seen on this site. You made me laugh, a lot. I really like what you did – very fun to read.
My response:
Context is king. I stand by most of these comments because they were written in a particular time and place where they were sensible, and other times insensible for the sake of sarcasm and fun. If you take these out of the context they were written, yes, it’s a very funny thing to read. At the same, you could do this with anybody’s comments. I have a lot of flexibility because I’m a fan and so my range of responses vary depending on the player. However, sometimes I read inflexibility here. Or perhaps, people focusing on minor points for a major point. I’m guilty of the same thing. It becomes no fun when somebody takes a position that is both inflexible and seems to think their on a higher ground. I’ve offered apologies on this site for this (feel free to do the same scan, and you’ll see), and I’ll offer another one here for comments that I make which may provoke unneccessary reaction. Others should do the same.
Maybe people think I have an inflexible position with this current debate, fine, let me know. Some of you have kindly shed some light in a polite way and hopefully you see some flexibility in me. Others haven’t. In addition, if you think my range of emotion is strange, that’s all part of the game. I played competitive ball and this is what it is – an emotional hurricane. Last night, one of the coaches said the same thing that this game is highly emotional – I express my emotion and love to have it checked by y’all – so again, thanks jscot =)
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 10:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
One thing NO ONE would ever accuse you of is inflexibility. In fact, when I googled for flexibility just now, your picture came up. :)
Yeah, it’s obvious you post a lot on the emotion of the moment. And like I said, and I meant it, it can be quite entertaining some times.
That said, I must disagree with this statement:
At the same, you could do this with anybody’s comments
Not mine. You can’t do it with mine, because I post so much rubbish that it would take too long to sort through it all.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 11:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The real reason you can't do this ...
… is jscot will send to very large men in dark suits and shades to your house if you do.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on Jan 15, 2009 1:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
any other description?
have you seen them before?
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 1:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Those who have seen them
dare not speak about it.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 2:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I dare
See my post in the JD re Letsblaze’s pic of droping off Shav and JB at work.
by southern oregon on Jan 15, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Had it not been for the computer mishap, it could've been the best calling out ever
Still, points for the effort. This site has a wacky editing system, and a lot of my posts get messed up like this too. I wish they could make everything editable, like when you start a fanpost.
by as11osu on Jan 15, 2009 11:22 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That was epic
ポートランド・トレイルブレイザーズ & 南カルフォルニア大学 トロージャンズ Fan
by Sexual Tyrannosaurus on Jan 15, 2009 12:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
jscot you have got to be the scariest stalker
ever
"What's that, some kind of hamburger?"
--Bo Outlaw on being asked how he felt about recording his first triple double.
by prezofdeath on Jan 15, 2009 4:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd for the insane over-the-topness of that post. Crap, Scot, I hope you work for a big politician doing research on opponents...
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 15, 2009 7:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
It’s sergioftw’s fault. He’s the one who said hotstuff is back and forth on Sergio, and that reminded me of the Big Three back and forth (the pro and the con come so close together with hotstuff), and the classic “Roy’s taking advantage and dogging it” post.
So I just read his blog (took about five minutes) and decided it was time. The copy/paste took me about half an hour, but it was pure entertainment. This guy guaranteed us the second round of the playoffs last year. One of the teams we might meet up with was the Spurs, and he assured us we could handle them no problem.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 8:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol thank you
i totally forgot about the roy dogging it post until you reposted it.
The most hated Blazer is like the least hottest supermodel - Sabonis4Ever
by Philthyanimal on Jan 15, 2009 9:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jason Quick is Right
It is Surge’s third year. Someone w-a-y back up there said that both Bayless and Surge are just potential right now.
So look, Surge’s 3rd year says, to me, that we need to see some of that potential realized. This next couple of games is the perfect situation to really put Surge in an environment and test what he is. Irrespective of where Bayless is right now or what Surge has done in practice lately, what management (and fans) need is closure on this issue.
We need, for the first time, good data on what Surge can do with many minutes and first-string opposition. Let these next few games do that for us.
I am very, very willing to sacrifice a couple of games to get the answer to this question that has been plaguing Portland for the last 3 years.
Time for Surge to step up; and it’s time for Nate to let the arrows fly and see where they land.
Buck Williams for the hall of fame
by Phizbin on Jan 15, 2009 10:28 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sergio seems defeated
He doesn’t know what to do anymore, it shows when he gets the ball. Everytime he wants to make a move it looks as if he is second guessing himself to make sure he doesn’t do what will get him pulled.
Look at the play last night where Sergio got the ball with 3 seconds left and had the semi open 3. He hesitated for a split second, which is all it took for the defenders to get on him. The only reason for hesitation that I can think of is because he’s been pulled from games/scolded for taking 3s that weren’t wide open. He also looks afraid to make the tough pass or even hit the lane anymore.
Sergio’s only chance in Portland is the next few games. HOPEFULLY, Nate will let him play real stretches and let Sergio know that he isn’t going to be instantly pulled if he makes a single mistake.
If not, do Sergio a favor and send him somewhere where the coach hasn’t made his decision.
by Zaig on Jan 15, 2009 11:31 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
maybe he hesitated
because he’s a terrible three-point shooter?
by abdelnaby on Jan 15, 2009 12:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
it's tough to survive in this league if you don't hit jumpers...
bayless is learning this fast…. whoever starts hitting jumpers and stops turning the ball over, will be winner in this debate
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 12:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
is he learning it? Really????????????
by Kartemax on Jan 15, 2009 1:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he means "Bayless is learning that you can't succeed if you can't make jumpers"
as opposed to “Bayless is learning to hit jumpers.”
Bayless college stats suggest he can shoot reasonably well. Therefore, his NBA struggles are probobly at least partly in his head. We will see if he is able to get over it.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Jan 15, 2009 1:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like Sergio as a player even less than I did a few days ago
And I didn’t like him much then.
Without wasting too much breath on this too-tired argument, Sergio just isn’t very good.
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Jan 15, 2009 1:52 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Check out this Trade possibility!
Sacramento Kings
Incoming Cash
*Cash compensation received from Portland
Incoming Players
Players:
Petteri Koponen
Salary: $0 Years Remaining: 0
Raef LaFrentz
Salary: $12,722,500 Years Remaining: 1
Channing Frye
Salary: $3,163,769 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 4.2 REB: 2.1 AST: 0.5 PER: 9.41
Nazr Mohammed
Salary: $6,049,400 Years Remaining: 3
PTS: 2.6 REB: 2.1 AST: 0.2 PER: 8.84
Outgoing Players: Shelden Williams, Beno Udrih, Brad Miller
Portland Trail Blazers
Incoming Players
Raymond Felton
Salary: $4,148,715 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 13.5 REB: 3.6 AST: 6.2 PER: 13.15
Gerald Wallace
Salary: $9,500,000 Years Remaining: 4
PTS: 16.2 REB: 7.4 AST: 2.3 PER: 17.83
Outgoing Players: Petteri Koponen, Raef LaFrentz, Sergio Rodriguez, Channing Frye
Charlotte Bobcats
Incoming Players
Shelden Williams
Salary: $3,395,760 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 3.5 REB: 2.4 AST: 0.2 PER: 15.76
Beno Udrih
Salary: $5,585,000 Years Remaining: 4
PTS: 11.0 REB: 2.8 AST: 4.6 PER: 12.66
Brad Miller
Salary: $11,375,000 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 12.3 REB: 8.5 AST: 3.6 PER: 16.10
Sergio Rodriguez
Salary: $874,000 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 3.9 REB: 1.4 AST: 3.3 PER: 12.12
Outgoing Players: Raymond Felton, Gerald Wallace, Nazr Mohammed
by NewRipCity on Jan 15, 2009 2:05 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
The Sacramento Kings would immediately decline that trade proposal.
by AK1984 on Jan 16, 2009 1:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I suspect not
They’d probably pass it around the office so everyone could have a good laugh. And then decline it.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 16, 2009 3:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...I think this thread is going to be interesting after tonights game.
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on Jan 15, 2009 6:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
that was incredible... mesmerizing - can't we all agree now??
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 7:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Even before this thread
We are not gloating too much, right?
by Norsktroll on Jan 15, 2009 7:06 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
trying not to =)
that was pretty spectacular, eh?
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 7:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio who??????
After J-Bay’s performance this game, even the Spanish know, the debate is over!!!!
"Great Oden's raven!" - Ron Burgandy
by danevan on Jan 15, 2009 7:09 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Bayless was unbelievable..
plus, he’s only a rookie… i’ve said for quite awhile he deserves at least 20 minutes/game …. we need him – bad!!
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 15, 2009 7:13 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's only one game. But you've GOTTA see the POTENTIAL...
"Now with a non-provocative footer!"
by timbo on Jan 15, 2009 7:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
3 by my count
Stuckey
Rose
Harris
The kid is gonna go places.
by nikolokolus on Jan 15, 2009 8:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly. You now have a definitive proof of POTENTIAL now with Bayless...
I am not poo pooing on Bayless’s game by anymeans, but if he is not going to the hole, what is he contributing offensively? I think this whole discussion comes down to style of play at the pg position. Do you want a offensive minded, attack the hoop type point? Or a distributing, playmaking type of point? Bayless hasn’t shown much potential towards the distributing side, and Sergio hasn’t shown much towards the attack the basket side. This discussion goes deeper than Sergio vs Bayless for me, its a style of play issue specifically regarding the point guard position. It is the same reason I was not a fan of Jarrett Jack. Great game by Bayless though, I need to say that again….
RUDY > MJ
by myemic23 on Jan 15, 2009 8:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Precisely
And my answer to your philosophical question is that it depends.
On court with Brandon, I want an offensive minded, attack the hoop point who will punish teams for cheating off him to help out on Brandon, Greg, or LMA. If he can stick the 3, so much the better, he’s got two ways to punish them. I don’t want him to try to score on every possession or anything, but I want him to be a major threat to do so. Tony Parker-style.
When Brandon is out and Rudy is in, I want a distributing, playmaking type of point to run the break and run a motion offense (if only Nate would install one).
In neither case do I want a pound the floor for 10-15 seconds PG, which too often Sergio ends up being, but I consider that a function of Nate’s offense, more than anything else.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 15, 2009 9:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I want a relatively tall, spot-up shooting, defensive-minded off guard who can bring up the ...
ball and occasionally run the offense — as well as defer to his teammates when necessary — playing beside Brandon Roy in the backcourt. That’s not Jerryd Bayless nor Sergio Rodriguez, though, but rather this devilish ladies’ man:
Kirk Hinrich is the answer, folks—there’s no doubt about it!
by AK1984 on Jan 16, 2009 1:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Steve Blake is essentially a cheaper version of Hinrich with less drive to the rim and on-ball defense
No complaining if he stays for the next year and more. Though if KP could convert him into Hinrich now (who is one year younger), he might do it even knowing it’s a risk mid-season since Hinrich would have to learn a lot about the team and plays, on the other hand the Bulls don’t play that different. I don’t think the Bulls would bite on Sergio to combine him with Rose (they went with Kirk and Rose tonight and would like such a guy who can back up and play with him). But since they are still hoping to retain Gordon they might be willing to give up Kirk for a decent price.
Working deals:
Steve, Travis and Ike for Captain Kirk and Thabo Sefolosha would likely get through with the Bulls.
Steve and Raef (expiring) and Ike or Channing for Captain Kirk and Drew Gooden’s beard (expiring if we want) probably, though that’s not really my favorite way to use Raef’s contract.
And yes, I do know Hinrich is a bit overpriced, but his contract is declining by $500k every year which is unusual, he is locked in until 20112 which gives a team some security to plan for the future and after that he would still be 31 with some years left. I love Bayless talent, but having also a stable “boring” point guard like Blake or Kirk on the roster with many different skills is an asset.
by Norsktroll on Jan 16, 2009 3:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Given LMA's propensity
to NOT draw fouls, I think we have enough spot-up shooters, and would like a guy whose shooting has to be respected, but who will force defenders to react when he has an open lane to the hoop.
Opponent foul trouble is always a good thing. If Bayless can get even close to shooting like Hinrich/Blake, we’ll be good to go.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on Jan 16, 2009 3:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
let's leap to conclusions
after one good Bayless performance.
Not.
Bayless did great – maybe Sergio is the one on Saturday. We don’t know because Saturday is not here yet. – Elgin
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 16, 2009 11:28 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bayless is currently the leading story on ESPN.com
And is the number one item in the Daily Dime
by usdblazerfan on Jan 16, 2009 12:15 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Front of ESPN.com this morning -
that’s incredible – let alone the daily dime story – is it too much hype?? when will he repeat a performance like this??
by hotstuffdb22 on Jan 16, 2009 5:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That is a reflection on the fact
that there were three games in the association last night, and Bayless was the big story in one of them. – Elgin
If you smile at me I will understand, because that is something everybody everywhere does in the same language. - Crosby/Stills/Kantner
by 22baylor on Jan 16, 2009 11:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The J will come for Bayless he just needs more run.
and I have no doubt that his ability to get to the rack will only help when it comes to him being able to pass to an open shooter.
by tevisthe4th on Jan 16, 2009 1:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Appreciate the personal taunting Hotstuff
Don’t confuse me with Sergio himself. I am a Sergio fan and still am, but what’s good for this team is good for me as a fan of the Blazers.
If you read my post history, I’ve never been anti-Bayless. He had a great game last night, and if that is the kind of performance he can repeat with consistency, then there is no doubt he is a huge asset to this team. I think, long-term, he can do it, and I’ve never said otherwise.
The person who created a Sergio vs. Bayless dichotomy was you, not me. So jumping up and own and trying to rub Bayless’ excellent performance in my face like it’s some kind of victory for you is just silly.
And, I’m sure I’m not the first to make this observation, but most criticism of your post on BE are that you are very reactionary and got from one extreme to the opposite based on the last game and fail to take a more thorough view of the team and season. Your over-the-top celebrating and grating “I-told-you-so”s are just one more incident of trademark Hotstuff posting.
"It's like, 'Urrrrrrgh!'" Rodriguez says, his cupped hands turning into fists. "It is a good feeling. Good feeling."



