Game 37 Preview: Blazers vs. Bulls
After a bunch of games at home plus some days off in between outings returning to a road trip with games left and right feels like old home week around here. Time to put the hard hats and work gloves back on. Hopefully we'll be able to crank out a few more wins.
A Look at the Bulls
The Bulls are the proud owners of a 16-21 record, which is kind of like saying you're the proud owner of a '99 Ford Escort. It gets you where you're going but this is not exactly a babe magnet. Their calling cards are a stellar backcourt and...well...a stellar backcourt. Derrick Rose is playing quite well, averaging 17 points on 47% shooting and adding 6 assists per game. It turns out it's a good thing the Bulls kept Ben Gordon too, as he leads the team in scoring with 21 points on 45% shooting from the field and 42% from the three-point arc with 4 assists and 3 rebounds per game as well. With Kirk Hinrich being injured all season, Gordon has saved the Bulls from the deep lottery. (Perhaps a mixed blessing?) Larry Hughes has proved a decent third guard, if not quite living up to the good form he had for a brief moment earlier in his career. He's had a couple of really nice games in a row, perhaps working out frustration over a lack of playing time and/or campaigning for a trade.
With Luol Deng, Andres Nocioni, and Thabo Sefolosha in the fold the Bulls should also be set at small forward. Deng has been off-again, on-again with injuries and has missed the Bulls' last 8 games with ankle trouble. He may return tonight. Nocioni is taking fewer shots this year and missing more of them, though he remains strong from the three-point arc. He's rumored to be on the trade block. Sefolosha has games that make you fall in love with him and then others that make you fall in hate with him. This has been a disappointingly sketchy crew for Chicago this year.
The Bulls' most serious problem is a lack of interior presence. I'm tempted to use the age-old comparison to a doughnut here but I suppose that would be lazy and inaccurate writing. Physicists will tell you that even though the middle of your glazed special looks empty there are actually subatomic particles floating around in there. Cosmologists will point to a miniscule amount of dark matter in that void, holding the doughnut together. The Bulls don't even have that. The biggest reason to be interested in their players 6'10" and over is to see what new abomination Drew Gooden is calling a beard/hair style this month. Seriously, that's a cry for help. The problem is that it's being drown out by the plaintive moans of Bulls fans who are probably drooling over Channing Frye as we speak the same way a destitute college student prowls the cafeteria saying, "You gonna eat that?"
OK...OK...it's not that bad.
That's not true. It is.
The good news is that Gooden has returned from injury (they called it an ankle but I suspect it was related somehow to getting smashed and employing hair clippers) to games of 18 and 10, 16 and 11, and 20 and 12. If the pattern holds he should have 18 and 13 tonight. If the Blazers play right he should sit with 5 fouls in 14 minutes though. After that the Bulls frontcourt sounds like a running joke.
"Tyrus Thomas...ha, ha!"
"No...no...wait! Joakim Noah!!! BWAH-hah-hah-hah!"
"Hold on guys! Wait! I've got it! Aa...haaahahaha... Aar...hahahahahaaa! I can't even say it! Aa...Aa...Aaron G-Gray!!! HAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!"
"Dude, you just made Bud Light come out my nose!"
The last time these two teams met the Blazers pounded the Bulls by 42. The biggest reason was their utter inability to stop, contain, or alter anything the Blazer big men wanted to do. Aldridge, Oden, Przybilla, and company might as well have spent half the game playing backgammon out on the court.
"Your roll, man."
"Hold up. I've got to go fetch this rebound."
"Naw, I'll get it. You take your turn."
"Sweeeet! Acey-deucey!"
"Cheater!"
"Hey, man, looks like you stepped in something."
"Oh man! I got some Joakim Noah on my foot. Where's that mop boy?"
The Bulls have a real hard time hitting a shot. They depend heavily on getting mass quantities of shots up in order to score their points. This becomes a problem because they're also fairly poor defenders. They do a good job out on the perimeter but it's open season in the key. As you might expect with that punch line of a frontcourt they are not good rebounders. They take care of the ball fairly well for a team that generates so many possessions. They also shoot foul shots well, though they don't draw enough to make a difference. One thing they do quite well is shoot the three, though again they don't shoot a ton of them. You do have to watch their perimeter players.
Even with their faults the Bulls are still dangerous opponents for the Blazers. Portland has a hard time dealing with guards and that's where Chicago shines. Experienced players like Hughes and Nocioni also gives the Blazers fits when they get on a roll. I'm not saying Portland can't lose this game tonight. They just shouldn't.
Keys to the Game
1. You know how we often say the best technique for an underdog is to outhustle the opponent? Don't let the Bulls outhustle you tonight. Stay focused, get a little scrappy, and fight for possession and good shots.
2. Remember how we attacked the paint against Golden State? Don't erase that game plan. Drive, post, pass...just get the ball in there. There's no reason to feast on jumpers tonight. Superior cuisine is three steps away.
3. Anyone double-teaming any interior player for Chicago tonight with the possible exception of Drew Gooden if he gets mega-hot should have their basketball license revoked. Just worry about the guards. Keep the guards out of transition and away from the rim. Just get a hand in their faces in the halfcourt and you'll be fine. Whatever frosting their big men give them won't be enough to cover the cake.
4. As our TV crew said during the Golden State game the Bulls will probably remember the 42-point pasting and be looking for payback. The best technique here is to use that memory to our advantage. You do that by jumping on them early and putting them down. Then they're hoping to lose by 20 and not by 40 again.
Final Thoughts
Our goal should be to win all four games on this road trip and walk away happy with three. That's pretty hard if we don't win tonight.
Check out the Bulls chatter at BlogaBull.
Enter tonight's Jersey Contest form here.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
Comments
Bulls fans who are probably drooling over Channing Frye as we speak the same way a destitute college student Ike Diogu prowls the cafeteria saying, “You gonna eat that?”
by Ben. on
Jan 12, 2009 1:26 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Buffet of Goodness
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on
Jan 12, 2009 1:36 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If Frye were to read their game preview and comments for this game...
He would be going:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Down on knees begging)
Don’t trade me to them!!!!! I don’t want to go to that hell hole and play for that moron they call a coach!!!!!
Help!!!!! I’ll do anything!!! P-P-Pleeeeeeeeaseeeee!!!!!!!!!!
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA brought it big and left it on the floor!!!!!!! Plenty of post play too!!!!!!
37:57 Mins 11-18 FGs 4-4 FTs +22 6 Off 7 Rebs 5 Ast 1 Stl 2 Blk 26 Points - LMA vs GSW 1-10-09
by LaMarvelous on
Jan 12, 2009 12:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Anyone else see this, and have questions?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/preview?gameId=290112004
ESPN’s Accuscore projection has it 51-49 in favor of the Bulls. Yet both Dave and the fellows over at BlogaBull say Portland should win this game. Does the computer know something we don’t?
by usdblazerfan on
Jan 12, 2009 1:41 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
It is 97.2% when people vote who they think is going to win.
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on
Jan 12, 2009 1:46 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm surprised they are favored
Those projections have a home court advantage built in, and I guess the system thinks the Bulls are close enough to the Blazers level that the home court will put them over the top.
I think if you played Por @ Chi 10 times, Portland would win 6 or 7, so obviously I disagree with Accuscore here.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on
Jan 12, 2009 2:09 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Blazers did a great job of stopping Rose last game with the full court press.
Gotta think they will try that again. I hope LmA has a great game, because of the whole Tyrus Thomas thing.
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on
Jan 12, 2009 1:43 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
You guys are still that into the LMA/TT thing?
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on
Jan 12, 2009 1:22 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Only the day before and after we play the Bulls
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on
Jan 12, 2009 2:27 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pretty much
that and the fact the bulls blogs justified it for a rather long time despite all evidence to the contrary. I think it was last year I was told that TT was a better fit no matter how good LMA was.
I imagine the blazer fans have done much the same with their players (like me going… “no… webster IS awesome! I promise!!!” He may end up being good, but Paul is a HoFer and webster could still be good, but he’ll never be as good as what we passed on).
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on
Jan 12, 2009 3:51 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Heh.
I think it was last year I was told that TT was a better fit no matter how good LMA was.
Whoever said this is a certified dummy.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on
Jan 12, 2009 4:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Drew Gooden is . . .
“a cry for help”, seriously. The frequent
bizarro grooming is scary, but look out for
Gooden putting it on the floor to get GO in
foul trouble. Step up Big Fella !!
KGW RULES !!!!!!
It's GO time !
by walkoff41 on
Jan 12, 2009 1:57 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
And all this time ive been operating under the assumption that my escort was the chick magnet.
hmm it must be my Blazersedge sticker in the rear window.
by tevisthe4th on
Jan 12, 2009 2:10 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
hey, last year i thought aaron gray was a decent 2nd rd pick
to be a 3rd string center. i think i still think that. am i totally wrong?
ignacio
by ignacio on
Jan 12, 2009 2:24 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
He is decent
For what they have pay him (ca. $700,000). Acceptable PER for a backup, gets some offensive boards and hustles, maybe gets a little too many minutes for the kind of offense he brings. And he is not exactly a frightening inside presence: A legitimate 7 footer who gets about as many blocks per game as Brandon Roy.
by Norsktroll on
Jan 12, 2009 4:18 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Dave, dave, dave
Cosmologists will point to a miniscule amount of dark matter in that void, holding the doughnut together.
You were right about the subatomic particles, but cosmologists aren’t even sure what dark matter is yet and it is definitely not holding the donut together. I just have to say this because it’s not often that physics (let alone the type of physics I did my bachelor thesis on) shows up around here. I’ll throw out the occasional kernel of physics knowledge to pay for the copious amounts of basketball knowledge you dole out on me. Whaddaya think? Too lopsided? What if I include my encyclopedic knowledge of…of….dang, that’s all I got.
I mean, how am I supposed to pick up chicks unless I can show off my awesome brain power and ability to correct people on minor analogies?
Anyway, the fellows over at blogabull are none too happy lately. The caption “This is a low (before they lose by 30 to Portland on Monday)” says it all really. I can only hope that the actual team is in the same poor spirits. I wouldn’t mind another blowout win. Maybe another dunk parade? We need to up our Hollinger rankings with an elite point differential.
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on
Jan 12, 2009 2:41 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
just because they dont know what dark matter is
does not mean it is not there and is more than likely there given there is such a huge deficiency of baryonic matter in the universe relative to observation coupled with recent indirect observations of dark matter and it is likely all around us, but I agree that it is not what is holding the donut together.
Also, you will not observe sub atomic particles in isolation as they are constituent particles of nucleons so at the very least you would have ionized hydrogen present, but since it is just air in there you will mostly have nitrogen, oxygen, and a few others.
I think the real way for the Bulls increase their defensive pressure is to decrease the volume and raise the temperature.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Jan 12, 2009 3:01 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was reading in Discover magazine
dunno if you’re familiar with it or not, an amazingly cool article about universal conditions (that is to say, conditions in the universe) that are so precisely justso that the most minuscule variation either way would extinguish life as we know it or would have prevented it ever from arising. It’s basically the idea that gave rise to the multiverse theory, because if there WEREN’T infinite universes (and those infinite chances for precisely those conditions to arise) then they only way they could have arisen (because they’re just too perfect) otherwise is if a higher power manipulated them — which is apparently an idea anathema to the the physicists referenced in the article. Really, really fascinating stuff.
by BlazersOrBust on
Jan 12, 2009 3:11 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
oops
read “those” as “thus” in the second parenthetical reference.
by BlazersOrBust on
Jan 12, 2009 3:12 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am a little familiar with these ideas
the guy who came up with the idea of quantum computing, David Deutsch, did so as a test for the multiverse theory.
One theory that I am less familiar with is M-Brane theory in which big bangs happen all the time so given enough time the right conditions to form a life supporting universe would certainly happen
cool to see other people are into physics as well.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Jan 12, 2009 11:17 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Whoa
It’s basically the idea that gave rise to the multiverse theory, because if there WEREN’T infinite universes (and those infinite chances for precisely those conditions to arise) then they only way they could have arisen (because they’re just too perfect) otherwise is if a higher power manipulated them — which is apparently an idea anathema to the the physicists referenced in the article.
Just can’t get away from intelligent design for some reason. wink wink I bet Dave has an opinion on this….
"...we have so many experts who think that you have to play defense, you have to rebound, you have to be a possession coach, you have to execute. I just laugh. Explosive offense is not as intimidating as dominant defense. But it is scary when you don't know how to stop someone." - George Karl, Nuggets coach
by jamon51 on
Jan 12, 2009 1:05 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There may be intelligent design, but if you believe that
then you can also believe that there are rules to the design, and figuring out HOW it happened involves figuring out those rules. Going back to “the god on the mountain did it” doesn’t really describe the how. Science does regardless if you’re intelligent or not. Something as complex as the universe or multiverse has to have rules to survive.
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on
Jan 12, 2009 3:56 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I do know this theory, it's really very interesting
Are you familiar with the Anthropic principle? Essentially, that principle says that the universe must exist as it does (fine tuned for life) because intelligent beings exist (us) who can ask the question, “why is the universe conducive to the development of intelligent life?”.
I definitely like the wiki article on this subject:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on
Jan 12, 2009 1:09 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the anthropic principle
seems a bit circular and a little like a cop out so that you dont get into the realm of metaphysics, which the tools most physicst’s have are not able to do much good.
I think the anthropic principle is a bit of a stop gap and people are coming up with more interesting and creative ideas as to how the universe developed.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Jan 12, 2009 2:33 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Slightly off topic
but all that made me think of this band called The Eels, the guys dad was nuclear physicist, Hugh Everett, who came up with the theory of multiple universes, and his son doesn’t any math ability, but a ton of musical talent, weird how that happens.
by Peteyhasnohead on
Jan 12, 2009 3:28 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's a great band for starters
and second, the relationship between math and music is really pretty cool. What’s a change in octaves except for a variation in waves per second? The fibbonachi sequence and the so-called golden ratio have both been shown to have applications in music. And math and music are the only fields in which child prodigies can produce work at what we consider adult-level genius. It blows me away that there’s so much stuff we don’t really know.
…like, uh, who’s winning the game tonight! Go Blazers!
by BlazersOrBust on
Jan 12, 2009 10:18 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah but how does AK1984 weigh in on this??
and has anybody consulted timbo??
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on
Jan 12, 2009 9:19 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the phrase 'sub atomic particles' is often used to mean 'elementary particles'
when speaking generally. There are some elementary particles who are extremely unstable when in isolation but there are others who do just fine on their own. Quarks, for example, are unstable unless combined in groups of 3s, but there is nothing wrong with a rogue photo running around in the empty space in the donut. Also, I think you mean constituent particles of an atomic nucleus or more specifically, constituent particles of protons and neutrons.
You’re right about the dark matter, but it would be improper to say that dark matter exists in a place as specific as the volume in a donut hole if scientist can not yet determine even its most basic nature or the type of particle/matter it is made up of. It is, likely, all around us, but its effects are (as far as we know) only large scale in nature. Otherwise, scientists would have detected it already.
Also, that was a really bad chemistry/physics joke. PV=nRT
"It’s a good ol’ fashioned Rip City beat down!"
by Magnum on
Jan 12, 2009 12:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I dont think
photons are considered fundamental in the same way quarks are as you can not make fermionic matter out of them. Also you cant really define a photon in a realistic experiment as weak classical light, coherent states, could only be distinguished from a single photon in the limit of infinite time of measurement. In addition there is some debate as to whether or not photons really exist, not by crackpots, but by guys like Jeff Kimble. Let me try and stave off the argument that the photoelectric effect implies photons as you can generate the same results by assuming quantum matter and classical light.
The problem with dark matter is not that its effects are long range, it is that it does not interact via an easily measurable force, gravitational attraction of extremely light particles. The ligo experiment should tell us that if we are unable to detect gravitons that mediate gravitational interactions between bodies much more massive than dark matter, than our current technologies are not up to the task. It is becoming less and less a question of if there is dark matter, but how do we set up a reproducible experiment to detect it. Granted that I am no expert in this field, but I feel fairly confident in saying that there is dark matter all around us despite the fact that we havent detected it.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Jan 12, 2009 3:00 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Has anyone else read
that article on the Blazers and sleep by Quick. Terrific article, I never appreciated how much that matters on road trips (especially east) until I read that.
by neutroticblazerfan on
Jan 12, 2009 3:14 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
just went and read it
very, very cool. I like this a lot better than Quick inserting himself into the conversation around the team.
by BlazersOrBust on
Jan 12, 2009 3:18 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It was fascinating
I’m not surprised it got TrueHooped. Here’s a linky thingy to the story for anyone who hasn’t read it yet. It’s a must-read article.
by Corvid on
Jan 12, 2009 11:13 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great article
Simple things like good regular sleep are essential before every top performance, whether athletic or in school/business/everyday life. I read somewhere that the trainers made a point that Roy needs to sleep long enough (and drink a gallon of water before noon) during rehab. Even a few hours too little can really slow you down. Although there is a catch: KG reportedly slept very bad to not at all during the playoffs last year, and that just made him more pumped come game time :)
by Norsktroll on
Jan 12, 2009 11:22 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was surprised
that people didn’t ALREADY know this. I mean, no DUH you want to get your sleep if you can!
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on
Jan 12, 2009 3:58 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So how many points does Greg slam down tonight?
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Jan 12, 2009 6:05 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
8? 10?
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on
Jan 12, 2009 3:59 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
As the proud owner of a '98 Ford Escort
I’m terribly offended
by champs2011 on
Jan 12, 2009 7:40 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
It could be worse. You could own a Ford Fiesta
by Norsktroll on
Jan 12, 2009 9:50 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Or how about a Yugo?

Oooooo, now there is a chick magnet! :)
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA brought it big and left it on the floor!!!!!!! Plenty of post play too!!!!!!
37:57 Mins 11-18 FGs 4-4 FTs +22 6 Off 7 Rebs 5 Ast 1 Stl 2 Blk 26 Points - LMA vs GSW 1-10-09
by LaMarvelous on
Jan 12, 2009 12:53 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
dude
I think i actually like that car. Some big tires, a cool sound system, a nice paint job… i’d totally take that into the mud.
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on
Jan 12, 2009 4:00 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I just realized
this weekend that “Blazers Edge” is a play on the saying “Razors Edge” I am a moron
by captain flitzy on
Jan 12, 2009 8:01 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Razor Ramon vs. Shawn Michaels
Wrestlemania 10, ladder match. You just brought back some good memories.
Brandon Roy is the Shawn Kemp of monogamy
-BE poster whose name I can't remember
by TheTinfoil on
Jan 12, 2009 8:31 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
First ladder match ever
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on
Jan 12, 2009 2:28 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
you're sharp.
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on
Jan 12, 2009 4:00 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Been awhile since I checked out the Bulls
but I think you’re seriously underrating noah, and thomas to a lesser extent. Noah isn’t much of a scorer, but he’s a good presence in the middle. He’s third in PER and first in WinScore on that team but 10th in playing time per game. Not that I’ve caught them that much this season but in the few games I saw, I saw the same thing – good things happen for that team when he’s in.
Aaron Gray on the other hand also shows well in WinScore and low in PER, and he’s pretty wretched, especially on defense where he’s so slow that he’s a serious liability. I feel like I’m watching a team tanking when I see him in the game, and the fact that he’s started more games than Noah indicates to me that the problem with the team remains coaching and leadership, not players.
by howlingfantods on
Jan 12, 2009 8:21 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
good points
It is amazing the Del Negro is a coach and Paxson still has a job. I guess when you luck into a #1 pick and choose the more Chris Paul like player of the Andrew Bogut like player then you are really good at being a GM.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Jan 12, 2009 11:49 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The inflamatory, allbeit jovial reviews of our opponents
are rather unnecessary. Mostly the stuff about their interior/frontcourt presence. Sure, they’re weak, but they’ve had a long road trip and injuries to deal with, and have still won 16 games.
I’m just imagining being a Bulls fan and reading these reviews. I don’t see any other blogs being this harsh on their opponents.
…not to mention they’ve beaten Phoenix, Dallas, and Utah this year, something we have failed to do in 5 attempts.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
by Arby on
Jan 12, 2009 8:34 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Strike that
We’ve done that once in 6 attempts. My mistake. How can I forget the big Phoenix win.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
by Arby on
Jan 12, 2009 8:38 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I ate at your place once
and forgot how to keep food down.
by MiledAnimal on
Jan 12, 2009 8:55 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You should read the Bulls fans
They probably think Dave overstates their abilities.
I know you can put admiration in bags, because admiration is real, and tominhawaii says that everything that is real is measurable.
by jscot on
Jan 12, 2009 9:22 AM PST
up
reply
actions
1 recs
I have
and I understand that viewpoint…but usually it’s different when a non-fan says it.
Sure, we can rag on Trout all we want, or call Oden a bust, or call LMA and Rudy soft, or Roy injury riddled, but hearing it in a wise crack from another team’s board is a tad different.
Just my 2 cents.
"Respect everyone, fear no one." -TP
by Arby on
Jan 12, 2009 9:35 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i feel as long as its on OUR board and not theirs.....
"..[Travis Outlaw] could jump, grab a rafter, eat a sandwich, and then dunk.."
tmundal 12/30/07
by LetsBlaze on
Jan 12, 2009 9:36 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree with you as long as we don't play the Troll over on BlogaBull why not have some fun?
I don’t mind if they do it to us on their blog.
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA brought it big and left it on the floor!!!!!!! Plenty of post play too!!!!!!
37:57 Mins 11-18 FGs 4-4 FTs +22 6 Off 7 Rebs 5 Ast 1 Stl 2 Blk 26 Points - LMA vs GSW 1-10-09
by LaMarvelous on
Jan 12, 2009 1:55 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yes, and then we can tell them why they're oh so wrong.
dang birds.
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on
Jan 12, 2009 4:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, I'm not really sure why
Dave would want to spend that much time ripping on the Bulls. I mean, we at BaB do that enough as it is…it’s not like we don’t know that our interior sucks. There’s really no point in piling on, considering, you know, the fact that you guys haven’t exactly lit the world on fire in recent years either. I also must say that it’s funny how certain BE’ers complain about how people at BaB tend to cuss a decent amount and it’s looked down upon here, yet it’s totally acceptable for site admins to openly bash an opponent before the game even starts? Double standards, FTW.
Ah well, such is life in the blogosphere!
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on
Jan 12, 2009 1:26 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sometimes
it just feels good.
That’s my guess. How many times a year can Dave go “yes… we’re pwning you now! MWAHAHAHA” I think he’s repressed and just needs to let it out every once and a while. Also, he probably needs a dictionary to define what pwning is, but that’s besides the point.
Greg Oden, where posters happen.
by ratbastird on
Jan 12, 2009 4:04 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, they really don't.
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on
Jan 12, 2009 4:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oh puh-lease
Check out this preview from the first Blazers-Bulls game:
http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/11/19/665132/game-12-preview-bulls-vs-b
See that? Dripping with restraint and respect. You know what you guys did? You went out and lost by 42. You deserve a little ribbing.
—Dave
by Dave on
Jan 12, 2009 11:09 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Heh. Nice!
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on
Jan 12, 2009 1:24 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did you check out the frontpage of Blogabull lately?
The title story reads “This is a low (before they lose by 30 to Portland on Monday)”. The Bulls are smuggling again this year, their fans have not much fun with the new coach, and had they not lucked into Derrick Rose so that now they have something to look forward to they would hate the whole team. Thus they only hate five to ten guys.
Also, Dave and Matt who runs the site have been bashing each other’s teams in a friendly way for the longest time (technically Matt is Dave’s “supervisor/manager” on SBN as he is overlooking the basketball sites – though I doubt he has a thing to say about content). If we lose, we have set ourselves up for some well deserved mocking. I doubt we do.
by Norsktroll on
Jan 12, 2009 9:48 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah...
and as quality of a blog as it is, I was quite surprised to find the f-word used right in that post. I’m not particularly offended by that word, but I think it does show one of the reasons why Blazersedge is one of the elite NBA blogs. We have high standards of member conduct, excellent blog posts containing professionalism and thorough information made possible by our trusty, dedicated Blazersedge bloggers, and the best fans in the NBA!
Go Blazers!
by blazersand2000 on
Jan 12, 2009 10:24 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's cool that you can cuss over there
It’s like hanging out at a cousin’s house with a cool mom and dad. You don’t want to live there, but it’s fun to visit.
I'm a Blazers fan and If you ban me from your blog, I'll sue you!
by tominhawaii on
Jan 12, 2009 1:14 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
haha
loved that.
And I agree with Dave’s analysis (and love his blog in general), and appreciate any new ways to call the Bulls ‘suck’. Though I’d prefer he didn’t make fun of Tyrus Thomas.
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Jan 12, 2009 1:32 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And you get to watch rated R movies.
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on
Jan 12, 2009 2:32 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Bulls are smuggling? I hate you, Apple dictionary/spell checker.
by Norsktroll on
Jan 12, 2009 10:27 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Our settings must be different.
I have an Apple too, but mine just underlines misspellings in red, not automatically correct them. Boy have I accidentally typed some outrageous words on my iPod Touch though!
by blazersand2000 on
Jan 12, 2009 10:39 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I screwed up, but the spellchecker suggested the wrong word
Reminds me of the old Newton joke: How many Apple Newton engineers does it take to change a lightbulb? Farm.
That thingy had horrible handwriting recognition, but it was “state of the art” at its time and I really really wanted one as a teenager when I saw one. Boy I’m old.
by Norsktroll on
Jan 12, 2009 11:06 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I thought it was apprapos
as there attention is definitely on something else besides basketball, so I thought “Maybe they are smugglers, as they are not a basketball team at this point.”
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Jan 12, 2009 11:53 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You are so naive
I’m the Blog a Bull ambassador and they are way more harsh on their team. I feel like Bill Cosby’s son trying to change a tire over there. (Can I joke about that?) They’re a swell group of folks and they are madder than hell at their team and management.
I'm a Blazers fan and If you ban me from your blog, I'll sue you!
by tominhawaii on
Jan 12, 2009 1:12 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey now...
Don’t be ragging on 99 Ford Escorts… My wife and I used to both have one until mine got totaled by a C-tran bus in Jan ‘06. The one she still has is the best car I’ve ever had.
by ranma on
Jan 12, 2009 8:47 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
but would you agree
that it is not going to attract a lot of ladies, especially the kind of ladies who are attracted to a car?
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Jan 12, 2009 11:54 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
'99 Escort
I loved my ’99 Escort. I signed up and logged in just to say that.
Great site by the way.
by Rockjaw on
Jan 12, 2009 10:26 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Seems like a great way to gain new readership
Maybe in his next post Dave could mock owners of Toyota Camrys or something.
by Norsktroll on
Jan 12, 2009 10:29 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A Prius would also be another good vehicle to mock.
Then again, that might also imply that the Bulls are efficient, so maybe not…
by blazersand2000 on
Jan 12, 2009 10:44 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You can get about the same mileage
out of a clean diesel without the risk of battery explosion during a crash. Plus, hybrids are not environmentally friendly since they use lead-acid batteries. Nothing like a little sulfuric acid to brighten up any ecosystem.
by torsoheap on
Jan 12, 2009 10:53 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So maybe we should compare the Bulls to a Prius
Joakim Noah’s hair can’t be environmentally friendly!
by blazersand2000 on
Jan 12, 2009 11:01 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the emphasis is more
on reducing carbon emissions which hybrids of the same mileage as a diesel will definitely do. Also, many greener technologies have environmentally costly production such as solar cells and compact fluorescents, but the question is if their overall impact is less than current technologies.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Jan 12, 2009 11:58 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think my family were the only Yugoslavians
in America to actually own a Yugo. My favorite joke: “You go. The car doesn’t.”
Just an awful, awful machine.
The poster formerly known as Freethefro.
by MPG on
Jan 12, 2009 1:42 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
... I drive a Dodge Stratus
I am an important member of this community
http://www.hulu.com/watch/3526/saturday-night-live-family-dinner
by Peteyhasnohead on
Jan 12, 2009 2:13 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I also drive a Dodge Stratus it is a 2000 Stratus SE and I love it. Very reliable car and not bad on gas.
Blazer's Edge Ambassador to The Dream Shake Blog
LMA brought it big and left it on the floor!!!!!!! Plenty of post play too!!!!!!
37:57 Mins 11-18 FGs 4-4 FTs +22 6 Off 7 Rebs 5 Ast 1 Stl 2 Blk 26 Points - LMA vs GSW 1-10-09
by LaMarvelous on
Jan 12, 2009 2:58 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
For some reason
this game feels like a trap game – mediocre team playing at home, got whupped by 40 points the previous meeting, etc. Like Dave said, Chicago’s front-court is pretty weak, but their guards can light it up. Smells a bit like GS eh and Portland didn’t exactly apply a beatdown even at home.
I think this game is enough tailor-made one for LMA. If he shoots anything beyond 12 feet or takes any shot fading away, Nate should have him doing push-ups during the time-outs.
Is Blake going to guard Rose? That’s a big advantage for Chicago. Is this a good game to start Bayless and see what he can do?
by torsoheap on
Jan 12, 2009 10:35 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Nate is the George W. Bush of lineup changes
The whole world can know you’ve got it wrong, but you hold firm on “principle.”
Brandon Roy is the Shawn Kemp of monogamy
-BE poster whose name I can't remember
by TheTinfoil on
Jan 12, 2009 11:05 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
not cool
maybe you should listen to last weeks Quick podcast to get an idea about how and why Nate does things.
hopefully your post was just a joke and not an indictment of Nate’s coaching ability.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Jan 12, 2009 12:03 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LMA did an amazing job on Rose in the first game
and the rook has been playing worse than he was at the time of the first matchup.
by Cablinasian on
Jan 12, 2009 11:37 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rose was a non factor last time
You must not recall how Rose had one of the worst games of his career against Portland. This was not because of Bayless playing trash time. This was because the Blazer’s put constant pressure on Rose.
by ChapinRA on
Jan 12, 2009 1:07 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
...and because the rest of the team was horrendously bad that night
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on
Jan 12, 2009 1:29 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Part of it
comes back to Rose not being able to run the offense that night.
by Zaig on
Jan 12, 2009 2:25 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think my problem is that
I underrate Blake’s defense. Either Rose isn’t as quick as I remembered from the NCAA tournament or Blake is faster, but he seemed to keep Rose in check for sure.
I’ll remember not to sleep on Blake. He’s more than just a solid player.
by torsoheap on
Jan 12, 2009 9:38 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Let's not forget that we beat them down
when we were on the second night of a back-to-back
by Cablinasian on
Jan 12, 2009 11:37 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
According to a Chicago radio report, Hinrich will be available
Should be interesting . . .
by Corvid on
Jan 12, 2009 2:24 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Showcase!!!!!!
You know you want him, KP!!!
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on
Jan 12, 2009 2:32 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Is Deng playing?
"When I have the ball, I experiment." #5
by Sabonis4Ever on
Jan 12, 2009 2:38 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
reportedly
USE THE SOFTWARE. Actions-> Rec/Flag. Reply to comments with the reply button. Rec good fanposts/fanshots so the crud gets pushed down.
by your friendly BullsBlogger on
Jan 12, 2009 2:43 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Some Bulls fans are dumb enough, they'd actually consider that
Deng is soft, didn’t you know!
When I watch NBA games I often call the fouls before the referees do. Sometimes it’s a gift. Most of the time it's troublesome. - NBA Observer
by Illini15 on
Jan 12, 2009 3:42 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
and some Blazer fans are big enough homers...
… that they’d be worried about Deng being willing to come off the bench (because, you know, Batum and Webster are both better than Deng).
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on
Jan 12, 2009 3:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Rust
Not everyone can get back into their A game after a quarter like Roy. Don’t expect these two to make much of a difference!
by Zaig on
Jan 12, 2009 3:09 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs


















