Tuesday Discussion: Critical Pieces
So...we've had nearly a whole summer to consider the roster, get a look at newcomers, and reflect on progress made (if any). Having been through all of that with a heaping side of analysis, here's the question:
I'd like to know which Blazers you think are most critical to the team's success. We're going to consider this year as well as the eventual chances of winning a trophy, which may be the same to you or may be different. To broaden discussion the players will be split into two broad categories. Those categories are...
1. Potential Superstars Roy, Aldridge, and Oden.
2. Everybody Else.
So... Which of the three superstars is most critical to team success this year and which of the remaining players is most critical? Do your answers change when you consider the long term?
Made-Up Example: Right now Roy is the key player from the top three and Outlaw is the key among the rest of them, but long-term Oden is the crucial guy and Martell Webster will be the most critical of the complementary players.
Also let us know why you chose who you did.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
great topic
I think the answer to the first part, both this year, and long-term, is Oden. We saw what Roy and LMA did last year without him. They both raised their games in year two, and they both proved they are all-star material. Take Oden out of the equation for this year, and where would we be expected to finish this year? Probably with a slight improvement on last year, maybe a 1st round exit. But Oden’s the wild card for this season. Scenario A is that he is relatively ineffective, due to either injuries, foul trouble, rookie adjustments, or some combination thereoff. We’re right on the playoff bubble – we know what we are getting from Roy and LMA. Scenario B is that Oden stays on the court and is a more dominating presence than many expected. All of a sudden our potential for THIS season soars. now we are talking 2nd round, maybe WCF, and who knows what can happen from there. Long term it’s pretty much a no-brainer. Without Oden turning into the Oden he’s always supposed to have been, we’re a nice team. We add some experience and pieces here or there, we are a perenniel playoff team. But no one is scared of us. No one is talking dynasty or championship windows. That’s all Oden.
The everyone else category is a bit more challenging for me. I think this year the answer is Martel. If Martel can play consistently night in and night out on both ends of the floor, that is going to really elevate our potential this year. If he continues to be a guy who takes himself out of the game 3/5ths of the time, then our ceiling is lower this season. Long term I think the guy is Rudy. if he is Manu v.2.0, watch out. If he’s just another bench guy who can hustle, hit some shots here or there, but not play very solid D, then we’re still looking for some key players on our bench for the championsihp window.
Rule #1 of nitpicking is to get it right.
one question
why are Oden’s scenarios not so hot and hot? I really liked your post, but I could definitely see a scenario where his Joel P, but with more scoring due to his leaping and large hands.
Due to the Oden issue I am very interested in how LMA plays this year. How is the coaching staff going to handle having 2 options down low? How will teams play them? In your scenario A then LMA probably elevates his game, but in scenario B does LMA fall off? Does Oden take some of his touches if he gets a bankable post move? Will LMA only use his jumpshot on the offensive end and not show off any other aspects, which in that case we could just use Channing and move LMA for a wicked good piece? I think i am veering off topic now so let me sum it up by saying that I think the success of a LMA Oden combo will be key for the long term success of the Blazers.
As for everyone else I am going to put in on the shoulders of the spot up shooters. Blake, Rudy, Bayless (maybe?), and Martell will have a great weight on their shoulders to make sure they keep defenses honest so they cannot collapse in the lane and make LMA, Oden, and Roy less effective. I didnt mention Travis as that guy does not seem to like to catch and shoot.
As far
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
If Pryz could catch a pass, he'd be an offensive force - Oden can do that and more
Oden’s “downside scenario” isn’t Pryzbilla. We know Oden has vastly more athletic ability, speed and coordination. That said, if Pryzbilla didn’t fumble most o the passes that went his way, he’d probably score 15 a game. Even leaving out his better offense, Oden’s defensive abilities are mote like Mutumbo than Pryz. Add in good hands, explosiveness, and a feel for the offensive game, and even his worst case scenario is much, much better than Joel.
maybe
post surgery I have seen him dominate the likable Steven Hill. I will start believing when I see it against high level competition, until then I think the Pryz is accurate in that they both have been known to play well on D. Also, in defense of Pryz he was getting a lot of JJack “ohh I just jumped and I have neither a shot or a good passing angle…I guess I will throw it at Pryz’s feet.” type of passes so I am not going to put all the blame on him.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
Why LMA?
He’s descent….but unless he gets more aggressive I don’t see the superstar title honestly…I would throw Bayless in that category before LaMarcus just by watching his face on the bench in Summer League. That dude has the look of a Superstar. Clearly his family was killed by a basketball Rim and the only way he can recover his honor is but constantly draining shots. He wants the ball at the end of the game…I don’t see that look with LaMarcus…I like him…I want to keep him…I just don’t think he’s the goto guy.
Dunking on your head.
by Eat Politicians on Sep 9, 2008 12:59 AM PDT reply actions
LMA
is our new Rasheed, but luckily we are not asking him to be the guy, just one of the guys. I dont know if I am ready to ordain Bayless a superstar until i seem him against some NBA D near the middle of the season when the good teams are starting to click.
I like your handle.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
+1
While Oden while take some time to adapt to handling NBA minutes and I believe Roy will take up more of a distributer/leader role this year, I believe the key to success this season is LMA. His improvements on both ends of the court should continue and I expect a lot from his this year. For the “other” players I think th key is in seeing how JBay handles the switch to point guard. If he can make the jump, I think he will be a big piece in the future of this team.
Stars don't always have to be the "clutch" guys
I mean, 5 years ago, there wasn’t a guy in the NBA that you’d want taking the last shot in a game over than Robert Horry? And yet Horry is in no way, shape or form a superstar. KG was an MVP candidate last year, but I think even the Celtics would rather have had Eddie House or Sam Cassell (or Allen/Pierce, obviously) taking the last shot than him.
Some guys just aren’t wired for that. If LA somehow were to average 26 and 10 but never took a crunch time shot because of Brandon/Bayless/TO/Rudy, that doesn’t mean he’s not a superstar.
He's a Pippen
LA is not the star but he is a star and a better player cause of his teammates.
I remember LMA hitting the game winner
last season on a dish from Roy along the baseline. I don’t remeber of opponent, but i do recall Roy drove to the hoop and everyone collapsed expecitng him to take the shot and he drops the ball to LMA on the baseline for a 12ft jumper for the win.
Point being Lma can hit the big time shot, but generally it will be Roy who decides who takes that shot. We have several capable playersone of which is Aldridge.
How about comparing LMA to other PF's around the league? Boom!!!
LMA is going into his 3rd season people. He is a mere 23 years old, has IDEAL size at 6’11" 240lbs, IDEAL athleticism, has an inside/outside game that puts him in the ELITE skill range of PF’s around the association, and is already a scary threat as a weak-side help DEFENDER who excels at blocking shots.
More aggressive? Yeah. But don’t ever think he is going to body people up like a younger Shaq. Can Aldridge be a force like Chris Bosh… you BET!!! Can aldridge have an overall game better than Rasheed Wallace, absolutely. When Rasheed came here people were going goo-goo over him because he was 6’11" and could score 18-22 a game and grab 7-12 rebounds per night. Well we have a 22-year old version of that MINUS the attitude problem that was bigger than the entire state of Oregon.
What is our Twin-Towers line-up of Oden + Aldridge going to be like? Well, I can’t think of one team in the NBA who really has an answer for those two. Aldridge will take another step forward this year in his progression.
06-07: 9.0ppg, 5.0rpg, 1.2bpg
07-08: 17.6ppg, 7.6 rpg, 1.2bpg
08-09: I can’t wait to see, but it will be at least a step up from last season.
Who in the league is LMA as good or better than? Hands down I would take LMA over: David West, Lamar Odom, Rashard Lewis, Al Harrington, Emeka Okafor, Antawn Jamison, Rasheed Wallace, Kenyon Martin, Troy Murphy, David Lee, Andrea Bargnani, Andris Beidrins, Charlie Villanueva, Louis Scola, Nick Collison, and Elton Brand.
So that leaves perennial All-Stars Dirk Nowitski, Carlos Boozer, Chris Bosh, Kevin Garnett and rising star Josh Smith as guys who would probably give this team more at the starting PF spot. So, why are we even debating this guy as key to our future? Power Forward is a key position in the hoops world and we have it sewn up big time!
Our power forward spot is filled with LaMarcus Aldridge, then Travis Outlaw and Channing Frye and Ike Diogu. We have the best PF crew in the entire NBA. LMA will score 20+ppg this year and Oden’s presence will help change the perception of LMA being soft because all of a sudden we have a matured LMA playing next to man-child Greg Oden filling the paint. Boo-yah people.
by Portland Dynasty on Sep 9, 2008 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions
I agree with LMA = Better Version of Sheed
And people should check out Sheed’s first SEVERAL seasons…
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/rasheed_wallace/career_stats.html
He didn’t have a year like LMA’s 2nd season until his SIXTH season. They came out about the same age, played similar roles, so it wasn’t a situation where one player came out as a raw high schooling 19 year old. And while Sheed became a GREAT defensive player, I think LMA as of now is better defensively than Sheed was at the same point in their careers.
If Sheed coulda’ been able to handle Top Dogg pressure (or not have been forced to be The Man), and keep his head on straight, who knows how good he coulda’ been.
I see LMA as an even more skilled, much less emotional but much more consistent Sheed. I think he’ll have a lot better career as well. Their games are very similar, and will fit Oden perfectly.
I dunno if LMA is above all of the PFs you mentioned (yet), but he’s very good and will only get better.
Mortimer
Sheed played behind Chris Webber in Washington
and shared the PF spot with Brian Grant for a while in Portland, so he probably would have had better stats if he’d been the starter from early-on in his career.
I shoot layups like they're jumpers.
He still had close to 30 mpg
in his first three seasons in Portland.
--
by CaptainSexyJacob on Sep 9, 2008 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions
BIG 3 for a reason
Clearly, LA, Roy and Oden are the Big 3. Each will have allstar appearances. Right now, I think this is Roy’s team. Roy will still be the man this year, though LA should put up even better numbers and challenge in the West for an all-star appearance. Later, I think this will still be Roy’s team. But Oden will become so dominant in the paint that he will be the superstar of our crowded talent pool, and we will win championships mostly riding his broad shoulders.
The Field: right now, Blake! Trout is not far enough along. Martell does not have enough impact to separate himself from the pack. Bayless is not ready. In the future, the most likely candidate to make his way into a Big 4 is: Rudy. He will have proven to be the most important piece outside the Big 3 by all-star break. Bayless needs to make it work with the team. He cannot start alongside Blake. But he could start with Roy and Rudy, where he could have an impact as things shake out during this roster experiment year (Before Decade of Dominance 1, or “1 BDOD”).
It's officially been coined: "Decade of Dominance" (D.O.D.)
true
06-07: 9.0ppg, 5.0rpg, 1.2bpg
07-08: 17.6ppg, 7.6 rpg, 1.2bpg
That is a good year and did see the improvement last year, I would agree he is similar to Rasheed’s game, but nothing like the attitude. And although I remember it getting in the way of his game I also remember that if Rasheed got T’ed up, more than likely he would dominate the rest of the game which usually meant good things.
I just don’t know if you can teach persona. LMA looks like he’s waiting in line to ride the ferris wheel, nice and happy and holding a balloon. Bayless and Roy look like they are considering cannibalism.
I’m just saying, it’s that extra super-star quality thing.
Dunking on your head.
by Eat Politicians on Sep 9, 2008 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions
LMA looks confident and focused when he plays Rasheed

"sheed has probelms I have not yet seen in LMA’s three years as a PTB.
Early one mornin the sun was shinin,I was layin in bed
Wondrin if they'd changed at all,If there unies was still red.
Is that what confidence looks like?
Looks to me like he’s wondering how much the cotton candy costs…
I have my P.h.D in unreliable hyperbole.
by Eat Politicians on Sep 9, 2008 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions
The look on Roy's face is priceless
Also, is it just me or does LMA look like a slightly bigger Batum in that photo.
Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."
Too soon to judge...
LMA has shown fire on the court. I think you are taking the fact that he is a nice guy off the court and projecting that onto his “persona” on the court. He is no Mychal Thompson out there.
As his confidence grows, which it will by just getting on the floor and gaining experience (he has played with the USA team two summers in a row and he looked and played like the best big man on the floor in the Rookie/Sophomore game), he will learn how to force his will out on the court. He is a superstar in the making.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
right now
Roy by a mile and probobly Outlaw.
Long term, it will be Oden and probobly Bayless in a close call over Rudy. I hate Outlaw’s game (he seems to be a nice guy and he’s a very effective 6th man, I just hate his shot selection and inability to pass or dribble) and I don’t think any of the other guys are a lock to still be on the Blazers long term.
Boomshakalaka
critical
1. Oden. The Blazers were embarrassingly bad last year defending in the post whenever Joel wasn’t in the game. If Oden can be even half of the intimidator that everyone images he can be, it will have a gigantic impact.
2. Someone, anyone, who can step up and hit a 3. I think everyone saw what James Jones getting hot could do for the team, and I think it will be very critical to the team’s success to have a deadly long-range shooter. (Martell Webster, anyone?) But it’s far too early to say who will fill this role. I would like to see what Luke Jackson could do if given a chance, but I’m thinking his chances of making the team are diminishing with Frye’s injury as the temptation to keep another big man will be significant.
I have a love/hate relationship with the Cardinals' middle relief corps.
This season: Doesn't really matter, we won't win any team trophy now. Long term: Greg, Rudy
Superstar: Greg. If he doesn’t perform up to expectations, everything else we get from our other “stars” won’t be enough. Roy and LMA might be able to develop into a duo that guarantees for 50 wins, but they won’t win us the playoffs and finals alone. While I consider Roy a future star player, he doesn’t seem to have the superior talents of a dominant superstar who can score 30 to 50 points seemingly at will if needed, a la what a LeBron or Kobe can do. LaMarcus is a rich mans Jermaine O’Neal, but I have an even harder time picturing him as a “superstar” that other teams lose sleep over.
Everybody else (already on the roster): Rudy. He will be the closest thing to another star on this team, being able to destroy the opposition from outside and inside. The potential for a Kevin Martin type player is there, with some luck he might turn out to be a Ginobili type player. I might also have said Bayless, but right now I don’t have such a good feeling that he will reach his ultimate potential (ceiling: Gilbert Arenas).
Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."
I had the exact same thoughts
In the long run, my dreams rest on the shoulders of two guys who have yet to play a minute of NBA ball. It’s a sobering thought.
In the short run, it’s yet another year of development and assessment. There are so many unknowns I can’t comfortably name the guys who are definitive critical pieces.
My perspective
In the upper tier I consider Brandon Roy to be our most critical player this year and well in to the future. Oden has that “larger than life” potential, but Roy is the cornerstone of this franchise. It all begins and ends with Roy on the court.
In the role player tier, I see Steve Blake as our most crucial player. My reasoning again revolves around Brandon Roy. If Steve Blake is able to increase his effectiveness this year then McMillan will be able to use Roy in different spots while also allowing Webster, Rudy, Outlaw, and Bayless to play their games. I see Blake as the foundation of the complimentary players, and even for the upper-tier players. He is more valuable and important than most people realize.
Roy/Oden; Martell or Rudy/Rudy or Bayless
This year, Roy is The Guy. Without Brandon, we don’t even make the playoffs this year. Without Greg or LMA, we might make the playoffs.
In the future (by 2010-11 if not a year sooner), Greg is The Guy. Without Greg, we probably don’t have a legitimate shot at a championship (unless Rudy > MJ, right myemic?). If Greg becomes a superstar center, we would contend for championships even if Roy goes down with an injury, because at least one of Bayless/Rudy is going to be the star guard that you need to complement the Twin Towers.
Other guys? We need someone to bomb in some 3s to keep the floor spread, but who can also slash to the hoop on occasion to keep opponents honest. The most likely guys to fill that role this year are Martell or Rudy. In the long run, the most likely guys to fill that role are Rudy and Bayless.
Travis’ ability to score on anyone and knock down clutch shots is very important, too, but I think the all round 3 pt threat is more important.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
For what its worth
As one poster said, you can be a good team without Oden, but I can’t see winning Championships without him. The key to championships, after all, is rebounds and defense. Teams can match up against our other players, but few will be able to match up against Oden – when combined with our other players. And that’s the edge you need to win a championship. Blocking shots, altering shots, and limiting the other team to one shot because of his rebounding are the key contributions he needs to make.
As far as the other players, I’d select Bayless, then Fernandez, and then Webster. Not because I think one is more important than the other, but because Roy needs a solid complementary guard to play with. And that means a lockdown defender for the other teams Point, a good ball handler who can bring the ball up the court and deliver it to Roy to distribute much of the time, a good inside-out shooter and driver who can get into the offense, get his shot, and give Roy another scorer to distribute to, and a competent PG who can distribute the ball himself to enable Roy to take advantage of his own mismatches. Currently, this is not Bayless, but if he can become that player, then this will fill a critical piece we need for a championship run. Without such a player, we’ll be platooning guards in relationship to Roy. Fernandez would be second on my list because I expect him to be a third guard playing 30 minutes or more a game, and then complementing either Roy or Bayless by being a go-to offensive threat and passer. Webster is third, because I don’t see that position having the same impact because it’s role is defense and outside shooting. Important, but not as critical.
Process of elimination
I’d be surprised if anybody argued other than Oden being the most critical long term success factor. Short term is certainly more controversial. One way to approach it is to eliminate each of the big 3 from the court this year and guess at the impact. That would seem to favor Roy – though Frye being out 10 weeks makes replacing LMA a problem.
Roy does so many things so well. But I believe there’s enough backcourt talent that his skills could be replaced “by committee” even if it would be impossible to do so at his high level and get the timing right in terms of having the right skill on the court at the right time..
Assuming Frye comes back at a high level I think he and Ike could do OK replacing LMA.
Joel, in my book, is the best backup center in the game, but I’m sure when the dust settles we’ll see that there isn’t any collection of talent on this team (or the league for that matter) that can do what Oden can do.
So, near and long term most critical factor to the team’s success: Oden.
The MVRP? (Most Valuable Role Player): Geesh, that’s almost impossible to sort out. This season I’d say Travis in that if you took him off the roster the team would miss him the most simply because he’s a known quantity. Long term is even tougher…
Long Term MVRP: Only because I think Travis is (finally!) approaching his ceiling I’d flip a coin between Bayless and Rudy as a way of betting that the winner proves to be a better all around player than Travis. At the moment I’m guessing the coin comes up Rudy.
Which probably means in both cases for MVRP the real answer is… Blake.
P.S. or the player aquired via RLEC
Free Joel Freeland! (with the purchase of 1 Wafer)
My definition of superstar
Only about five guys in a generation, to me, get that title.
Currently the guys out there, to me, are kobe, Lebron (possibly but not yet), Wade (possibly but not yet).
These guys play a top level game, can take control and will it. Shaq was on that list a few years ago, but he is definitely an ex super start now. KG is awesome but could never get his team to win.
Using that definition the only superstar I see is Oden. Roy may surprise me and so may Aldridge, but Oden is a definite superstar if he’s healthy.
Now who’s most important on the team? Oden and Roy.
Oden is the game changer. Game changers can’t do it alone (see shaqless kobe and kobe/wadeless shaq).
Roy is the leadership, heart, and direction and soul of the team. Oden is the game changer, but this is Roy’s team.
Aldridge is the last of the big three. The guy is going to be amazing. For those who doubt or knock him, last year was his first year where he was able to play outside the shadow of injury and Zach. He stepped up and took the challenge and THAT should tell you something. He works HARD and as he understands his roll in the post, he’ll just get better. I honestly believe that Aldridge is one of the unappreciated blazers and the least appreciated out of the big three. this is not a guy who should be overlooked. Call him KG, call him Sheed, call him Chris Bosh, but this guy has amazing skill and he’s the knock out punch to other teams that are teetering from the 1-2 of Oden and Roy.
Of course, there’s also Rudy who will lead the bench in demolishing other teams.
Travis will either make starter or vanish. This is the year for Travis and Webster to prove themselves because Rudy and Bayless will start to gobble time as will Frye.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Sep 9, 2008 8:17 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Unfair to KG
The guy never had any help for years and Minnie still made the playoffs each season. When Minnie acquired Spree and Cassell, he got to the WC finals. When he went to a team with two better co-stars, he won a title. Put any superstar — Jordan, Shaq, LeBron, anyone — on the Minnie teams KG suffered with all those years and you’d have the same result: playoffs, but first-round exit.
No mention of Tim Duncan? Steve Nash? Chris Paul? Their teams would suck without them.
I shoot layups like they're jumpers.
I don't consider Tim a superstar
Steve nash doesn’t make the grade. He’s awesome, but not a superstar in my mind.
Chris Paul could be, but talk to me in five years. Wade and Lebron got mention but not real honors because it’s still potential.
I’ll concede KG as he did win it, and you have a point. His talent had a season ending injury and there were a couple of bone head moves by the wolves that held him back.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
If you concede my point on KG
it follows that you should concede my point on Duncan, since he’s won more titles and is widely regarded as one of the top three power forwards in league history.
I don’t mean to argue your main point, that the word superstar is more abused than the rec link on a TiH fanpost, but I think you go too far the other way when you leave players like KG and Duncan off your list. Nash, I can agree with you if you look at his entire career and not just his two MVP years.
I shoot layups like they're jumpers.
Nash...
You don’t consider a guy who won back to back league MVP’s a superstar? Is it just that he’s not that same guy anymore, or did you never consider him a superstar? Timmay has had an MVP year too, what does a guy have to do to be a superstar in your eyes?
Do it
for ten years running.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
The only way Duncan can be considered not a "superstar"
is in marketability. We’re literally talking about the best PF to ever play the game, who has won 4 rings, including one we’re he pretty much singlehandedly dethroned the Shaq-Kobe Lakers (check the 2003 playoff stats), and you have him ranked behind a guy who’s had 3 great years, one ring, and a bunch of T-Mobile commercials and a guy whose only rings have come riding shotgun to the most physically dominant center in the past 20 years or so. I’m not saying that Kobe’s not a superstar, but his record is nowhere near Timmy’s.
I agree with leaving the list as an exclusive 4 or 5, but it’s absurd to not have Duncan on it.
I suppose the difference is the will
Duncan may exhibit it differently though. Not everyone with the fire inside them showcases it. My girlfriend reminds me of this from time to time as I tend to show my passion and she’s very “soft” or “quiet” with hers. I sometimes think it’s not there but if I poke it is.
So that said, you make a good point about duncan, as does MA. He’s dominate, he’s been consistent. He’s a winner. In my mind it was that will that was missing.
Kobe wills a team to win. YOu can see it in his eyes, and you could see that fire lacking behind KG in the finals last year.
DW DEFINITELY willed his Miami team to a win and he had a pretty strong will in the Olympics as well.
Vince Carter can put up amazing stats, but he doesn’t come close to my super star list, and neither does tracy Mcgrady.
I don’t get that feeling that Duncan wills his team and that was the part that was missing for me.
hmmm….
Okay superstar list:
Kobe
Duncan
KG
Wade? (not a long enough time has passed)
Lebron?(not a long enough time has passed)
Chris Paul may phase onto this list too, but give it a few more years.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
That said...
Duncan is past his prime. I will remember him as a superstar, but I wouldn’t call him one anymore going forward.
I KNEW there was logic, but i forget what it is between posts and work.
Same goes for shaq. Not a superstar now, but he definitely will be remembered as one.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
big Oden fan here
I love Oden, but there is no way ANYONE who has never played a game is a “definite” superstar if he is healthy, especially when Lebron and Wade don’t even qualify yet. (Wade has already willed his team to an NBA and Olympic championships.) Oden is potentially a superstar, maybe even a super-duperstar, but let’s not pretend that health is the only uncertainty.
BTW, I agree that Duncan, probably the greatest power forward of all-time, has to qualify as a superstar.
by keephopealive on Sep 9, 2008 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions
Lebron
was a definite future star coming into the league and so is Oden. If you don’t think so, you’re underrating Oden. I understand what you’re saying, but some talents come into the league that there is no doubt about. The hype on Oden is not centralized on the blazers, but is coming from the league itself. they know what we have. Blazer fans just don’t want to believe we have someone that good.
I did put the injury disclaimer, but that’s the only thing holding Oden back.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
let me edit and say
blazer fans have been disappointed in the past and have a hard time believing that we actually have someone as good as Oden is, because they don’t want to be disappointed again.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
somehow I misunderstood
in your first post, you said Lebron was “possibly, but not yet” a superstar. I think Oden has potential to be Shaq or better, but I would never say he is “definitely” going to be a superstar, if that means being better than Lebron or Wade are right now.
But I agree with you that Oden will be awesome
by keephopealive on Sep 9, 2008 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Ah
Okay… let’s just say that Oden and Lebron are on the same level.
Lebron is definitely heading that direction and is highly unlikely to NOT make it, but I would need to see more out of him, and not just stats. I’d need to see the will to win and or ta championship.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
You're big on the Bayless factor
Maybe with guys like Duncan it comes out as a look of shock when he gets called for a foul, whereas with guys like Bayless it’s a look of intense determination, even when he’s shaving.
I shoot layups like they're jumpers.
Coming from left field a little...
I’d say that short term is dependent on LaMarcus and Martell. I don’t anticipate Oden being a true destroyer for a year or two, and without Roy we are a fraction of what we are, but Martell’s ability to keep the defense honest with that sweet deep shot of his and LaMarcus’ inside/outside game and ability to defend the whole length of the floor will propel us into the playoffs this year.
Long term, Oden and a decent, deep bench. Oden is obviously The One who will ultimately get ‘r dun again and again. I balked at naming one other individual because to me that bench could be a revolving door. We’re stacked right now with loads of talent, some may stay and some may go. We’ll acquire new studs through trades and the draft. All that matters is that we have 3, maybe 4 guys who are able and willing to come in and keep momentum. Whether those 3 or 4 guys is here yet…. ?
"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"
by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Sep 9, 2008 8:39 AM PDT reply actions
Own the paint
The great teams always have a front court presance.
Oden will be the dominate big man in the game and in long term it wont be close when he finally realises his full potential I dont see alot of other players wanting to challange him.
Pryz or whomever Portland has manning the center position off the bench will be equally as important, teams need those easy baskets that a good center provides or they need in Pryz’s case a defensive stopper/shot blocker.
Portlands strongest position imo is the center position, the season may prove that actually the 2 is the best position but I dont see many boards or blocks coming from there.
Good question
This year its Roy and Sergio/Bayless (whichever one ends up getting the minutes). We NEED good backup PG play this season to have sustained success. Roy will be huge as Aldridge and Oden adjust to playing together, and as Oden also adjusts to the NBA. Roy will be the only of our main three that can easily start out in his own groove.
In the future its Oden because he’s supposed to be the once in a generation player. Roy is unique, but there are always a lot of very talented wings in the league. Aldridge at best will be on par with Bosh, but Oden will be a beast that cannot be matched by any other player in the league. He’s supposed to be the guy that other coaches stay up late trying to build a defense against, only to have him eat their lunch. Of the ‘other’ category I’d say its Rudy in the future, because he is so naturally a team player. With Roy and Rudy being successful and so team oriented it should really help to limit any whining about roles and minutes from other players (or so I hope).
Who can you win without
To win now or a championship, you need the game changer, as ratbastird said that is Oden. Losing BRoy would be a blow and take a while to recover from, but he could be replaced, maybe with a guy already on the roster. Same for LMA. Oden being the player he is projected to be, can be the centerpiece, BRoy and LMA would be a nice team and win regular season games, but not likely win in the playoffs, reminds me of TMac and Yao.
Of the others for the long-term (2-3 years out), one that is an offensive stud (Rudy), one a shut down defender (Batum – that is what KP drafted him for).
Oden all the way
How should we think about “critical” and “crucial”? I would answer by what players performance would most determine whether you view the season as a success. Now, if Roy and LMA play up to their potential, you might make the playoffs even if Oden stinks. But how excited could you be? If Oden plays up to his potential, but Roy and LMA stink, you would still be ecstatic going forward, even if the Blazers missed the playoffs. The success of this season has less to do with whether the Blazers get into the playoffs, or into the second round. It has to do with whether or not Oden shows us that he is the guy who can eventually win the Blazers a championship (or several).
I'm confused....
Let’s start with my two picks, and then we can get to the confusion. In the first group, it’s Brandon Roy, and in the next it’s Outlaw.
Let’s move on to my confusion. It seems to me that the majority of fans as well as media types continually evaluate Roy as if he has reached his potential. It was the same thing when he came out after college. “Yeah, he’s a good player, but player X (and a ton of others) all have much more upside.” Roy is still growing as a hoops player and will be for some time. Yet look at how good he is already and think for a minute just how good he can become. Imagine what he will do when he has a killer 3 (and he WILL have one soon). It’s like the Blazers have a coach on the floor. He’s the one who wlil nesure Greg Oden’s potential is maximized. He’s the one who will take the last second shot to win the game. Oden has GREAT potential, yet Roy still has untapped potential as well. It’s sure gonna be fun to watch it blossom.
Outlaw is critical in that he is/will be the primary option on the “second starting 5”. His performance will determine if our second unit blows out an opponent, or has to scratch and claw to win. He also simply has more tools than anyone in the second group, and is looking to make his mark on the league. Outlaw for 6th man of the year (hopefully)!
2nd unit ?
Outlaw was huge last season for us a very pleasant suprise for sure. I have too throw a butt in there, Bayless is going to be all buisness on the second unit and Rudi without a doubt will quickly assume the big shot status he has carried with him for years(not the nba but still a top flight pro league none the less)Ike Diogu could also be another very good player.
Its fun as a fan speculating, but I feel bad for Nate trying to get the rotation put together.
I agree on Rudy
If he’s not a starter, the second unit is his.
Hence why the small forward position will be put to rest for once and for all by midseason.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
It looks like the key to Success is a good Surgeon
Torn knees, Dislocated shoulders, Bone Spurs, Liposuction…
OK assuming that everybody is done with their nips and tucks, the obvious answer is “the Old Man by the Key” I know that Wilt, as remarkable as he was, could never get over the hump, but that was almost exclusively because of another big man, Bill Russell. If you are very athletic and a few inches away from the rim, your chances are much better than anybody else- both in putting it in and keeping it out.
Next, the guy that will make the most of an impact that is not part of the big 3- easy.
Whoever excepts their role as a spark off the bench (like Vinnie Johnson from the Championship Pistons team). Vinnie had Dumars and Isiah in the starting line-up but never complained about being a starter. He would simply come into the game and kill you. I can’t say who that asset is for this team, but the guys that are unhappy about not being a starter are best left for a KP surgical removal.
Superstar is a Loaded, Destructive Term
Singling out players on a team for special attention and status is destructive to the team. If this version of the Blazers is to succeed, it will happen because every guy checks his ego at the door. In the first place, I don’t see Aldridge as having exceptional drive or talent, Oden is a rookie with no proven experience, and Brandon is injury prone. The hype / marketing that supposedly raises them above their teammates is just a load of super-rich fertilizer.
Michael Jordan did not wear a championship ring until he learned to share the ball. Wilt Chamberlain was called a “superstar” but did not have the same success as Bill Russell, because the team around Chamberlain was not as cohesive as Russell’s Celtics. Allen Iverson is a “superstar,” but Paul Pierce is a champion.
This kind of topic is, I fear, just an attempt to rouse the drooling masses who don’t understand the game. It’s understandable that someone would use these tactics to try to sell tickets, but it’s a mistake to believe this phony blabbing. Anyone truly interested in seeing a championship team in Portland would talk about how the team will play defense as a unit, how the ball will be distributed evenly, and how all the men on the floor will have each other’s backs.
.
If you say "basically" at the beginning of a sentence, you probably also put ketchup on everything you eat.
by CosmoPlavix on Sep 9, 2008 2:50 PM PDT reply actions
Rudy and Channing
Are definite keepers,JB as well if he dosent have a Joe Johnson[I would rather be the man on a dog meat team than have a shot at a ring]tude
by southern oregon on Sep 9, 2008 10:52 PM PDT reply actions
If I had to start a team with one player it would be Oden
With that said as of right now its Brandon’s team. But more importantly that I don’t think this team would go very far without both Roy and Oden. Like all great teams there is more than one player that can carry the load, Thats why its a TEAM game. If you go “Kobe” on someone it might work for a while but the team suffers in the long run. He has gotten better at that understanding but still gives his team-mates the evil look in crucial times.
Back to the piont at hand, Brandon does the incrediable when you think there is no chance. His amazing skills and abilitys never cease to amaze me. I also think that Greg is going to blow my socks off (or at least the glass off the backboard). LMA has, like stated before, a Sheed like game. He will be the James Worthy on this team. An important piece to the puzzle but not needing the spotlight. He fills in the holes.
The bench is so hard to figure out at this point. Travis has the upper hand because of experiance. With Rudy and Bayless now on board and another year under Martell’s belt, we have a deep, versatile and dangerous bench.
With all that said we must remember that with all this firepower the scoring for the Blazers will increase but some players might not get as many points as last season.
And that is fine as long as we stay a team and not get caught up in how many points did I get. The starters need to come out and show the other team that they have no chance to keep up with us. Then the bench needs to come in and crush any hope of a breather. If we do this watch out!!!!
D Marty
Look at the numbers
Dominate means over match nearly all opponents substantially on both defense and offense.
Players who dominate the center position = 1-2 per decade. Russell, Chamberlain, Jabbar, Ewing, Shaq, Olajuwon would fall into this category.
Players who dominate the PF position = 10 per decade. Worthy, Mikan, Unseld, Reed, Petit, Malone, McHale, Hayes, Cowens, Baylor, Barkley, LMA, Sheed, Jameson, Brand, Boozer, Nowitzki,
Players who dominate the wing position = 50 per decade. Jordon, Clyde, Dr J, Dominique, Pippen, Cunningham, Bird, Magic,
Players who dominate the point guard position = 10 per decade
Ergo Greg is our unique that others cannot match up to.He is most important this year and every year. We can likely never replace him.
We have a some good point guards and do not need to dominate there (especially if Roy plays there).
We have a top PF but could expect to acquire another in this decade.
We have a two or more top wings and could expect to acquire more in a decade.
As for role players I submit that Martell might become our most important role player. He has the body and the ability to dominate as a shooter and as a defender. Should he fulfill his promise he will be as important as Bruce Bowen is to SA. That lock-down defender is also more scarce in the NBA. I think we should expect nights when the defense has to win ball games and perimeter defense is our weakness (assuming our dominant center is dominant on defense as well). Roy is that the most important this year but with Rudy and Bayless here he might become replaceable.
The past two years have been the “perfect storm” in our drafts. But KP will likely continue to find players where others fail to value as highly. For all his immense skill acquiring another Greg Oden will be another 100,000 to one long shot.
Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by 
































