A Basic Defensive Primer: Part 1
I’m slowly catching up on e-mail topics. The ever-so-cleverly named “DarthBlazer” wrote last week and asked if we could explain a little about defense, especially what decent defense looked like versus poor defense. It sounded like a great topic, so here’s a layman’s defensive primer of sorts. This first post will only cover the basics, pretty much from square one. I’ll do a second post at some point about more advanced concepts.
Please note that I make no claim to brilliance or arcane knowledge on the subject. Nothing you read is going to be wholly original. I am indebted to a few coaches and scouts, both in person and in print, all of the Blazer radio and TV commentators over the years, plus a couple decades of watching games. I am merely synthesizing information. If there’s a mistake in here, blame me. If there’s something good, credit the people who take time to teach the game.
Generalities
The best way to conceptualize defense is the act of controlling space. People notice the blocked shots, steals, and forced distress but those are all end-products of a common thesis: whoever controls the space has the advantage. You can think of a basketball court like a chess board. (Many coaches delineate defensive areas which, while not exactly 64 chess squares, hearken to that game.) In chess your opponent probably won’t be able to move into a particular square with a good result if you have it covered. That is the goal of defense as well.
If you play any kind of person-on-person sport for very long you’re going to discover a basic truth about defending: all other things being equal the defense will always be at a disadvantage to the offense. This is because the offense, possessing the ball, dictates the action. Defenders have to react while the offensive players can simply act. In practical terms this means that, on average, a defender is not going to be able to take away 100% of the offensive player’s possibilities. It’s nearly impossible for a defensive player to control a space entirely. This is especially true in the NBA where players tend to be competent at minimum offensively, with most ranging into truly gifted territory. NBA players are also lightning quick, leaving less time for reaction. There are too many options to shut them all down. Therefore you will find NBA players, teams, and coaches picking and choosing which spaces to attempt to control at which time. Those decisions are made based on the gifts of the defender and offensive player alike, plus the general team philosophy. This makes analyzing and judging defense an intricate task…in some ways as intricate as designing it.
The middle squares of a chess board tend to be the most powerful as they allow the most latitude for movement, which is why good chess players try to dominate them. In basketball the middle area of the court is the most crucial as it allows not only varied movement compared to the sides and top, but better scoring opportunities. The most basic goal of defense is to control that area where your opponent has the best chance of success, which is usually defined by the key. Own the paint, win the battle. The easiest way to spot whether a team is playing good defense is to ask yourself how many times you see the opponent moving freely towards the basket and how often they get up close shots. Letting a player get into the middle unmolested is a sure sign your defense just went into Epic Fail territory.
After you’re sure you are set in the key you make defensive choices based on the gifts of your opponent. If a guy is a great outside shooter but doesn’t drive well (think Steve Kerr) you want to control the space right in front of him. If your opponent is a slasher with a suspect outside shot (take your pick of NBA guards) your goal is to control his path to the basket. This is what makes players like Kobe Bryant, who can break you down either way, so valuable. A premier offensive player will look at which space you’re trying to control and promptly get his shot in another. An important point: good defense includes not just controlling the space around offensive players, but between them. Playing the passing lanes well can throttle even the best offensive teams as it prevents the ball from moving freely around the court and thus limits the possible space the offense can use for attack. A defender not only has to be aware of his opponent’s gift, but where his opponent is in relationship to the ball and basket and how that correlates with the possible employment of those gifts.
Here you begin to see the difficulty in correctly judging defensive effort. You can’t just look at what the defender did, you have to understand what he was supposed to do. Sometimes a defender will look sharp and aggressive when pursuing a player, hounding him and pressing. Often that’s a good thing. Sometimes it’s not. If the offensive player has the ball at the far sideline and he’s not a shooter, you don’t necessarily want to be playing in his jock. You may be opening up an avenue for another player to cut down the middle behind your defense, leading to a higher percentage shot than the guy on the sideline ever would have gotten. Sometimes you’ll see a defensive player following his man rather slowly as the guy cuts across the court. The offensive player will sprint to the corner of the court while the defender will appear to lollygag in the middle. Coaches often tell players not to close on an offensive player hard, to stay in the middle and defend. In that case the slower movement is exactly the right thing to do.
Ruben Patterson was a classic example of a guy who looked like an all-world defender but drove coaches crazy because of his lack of defensive discipline. He would go out hard on every player in every situation, trying to poke away steals or force pressure. It looked great to the fans. Sometimes it worked great. Too often, though, he’d completely break the team’s defensive scheme. His man may not have gotten the shot, but him being out of position led to confusion among his teammates and the opponent getting a better look than they would have if he had just played within himself and within the scheme.
This brings up one of the core lessons of defensive analysis: be careful when assigning blame. Sometimes the guy who looks the best is the same guy making the mistake. Often a player who never seemed to affect the play should have and thus should shoulder blame along with the guy who made the obvious error. Very, very few coaches design systems that depend on one player and one course of action. Much like airplane engineering, there’s redundancy built into the system. If one part fails (and it’s assumed this is going to happen) another part is supposed to compensate. Defensive breakdowns usually require two or more participants from the defensive team. In other words, you can be as skilled as you wish individually, but it’s the team defensive effort that really counts in the end.
The Gold Standard of Team Defense
This brings us to the one, solid-gold standard even a casual fan can use to judge their team’s defensive efforts: contested shots. A shot which is contested is taken in space that somebody else controls. This can be vertically (the defensive player jumped up with the shooter and got a hand in his face or in front of the ball) or horizontally (the defensive player forced the shooter to move in an uncomfortable direction before attempting the shot). The ultimate goal of team defense in the NBA is to not let the opponent get any shots which are uncontested. There’s always at least one man in the vicinity to break up the rhythm. A secondary goal would be having any shots which do end up uncontested come from a place on the floor where the offensive player is not comfortable. With Tivo and a notepad you can track contested shots yourself easily. You’ll also begin to notice how amazing most NBA players are offensively. Many of these guys can get a decent shot up with almost no daylight. Watch how hard it is to contest Ray Allen’s shot. Watch how little clearance over outstretched fingertips these guys need to get the ball away clean. You’ll begin to appreciate how hard you have to work in the NBA to be an effective defender or defensive team.
Note that a contested shot is often a better measure of defense on a given possession than whether the shot actually went in. Defense is a game of averages. Don’t think that every made shot comes as a result of poor defense. Sometimes a defender can do everything right and the shot still drops. Sometimes a defender blows it and his opponent still misses. In the famous gold medal Olympics game you might remember in the first half (I don’t have the game recorded anymore so forgive the fuzzy specifics) Rudy Fernandez was being guarded on the perimeter by one of the U.S. guards…I think maybe Dwyane Wade. Rudy was beyond the three point arc and juked a little but the defender stayed in front of him. After the shake and bake didn’t get him free Rudy simply rose up and drained a spectacular three. It was a great shot. It was also good defense. Even though that shot went in I guarantee you the opponent would be happy as pie to see him attempt a steady diet of those because on average, over time, he will miss most of them. Even though
You’ll often hear commentators talk about a team getting a “stop”, meaning they prevented the other team from scoring somehow. To my mind the word “stop” only applies in a specific, critical situation where a single basket can win or lose the game. If you move beyond that single, key possession and look at defense as a whole, a team won’t really “stop” another consistently over the course of a game. Rather they aim to make it as hard as possible for the opponent to score…to make them earn their points. Perhaps a more accurate (though cumbersome) way of describing overall defense is to say the team is looking for a “difficult” rather than a stop.
The Basic Principles of Individual Defense: Guard the Basket and Ball-You-Man
If the general object of defense is to control space then it follows that whatever scheme you use must put defenders in spaces that are crucial for offensive success. This is what being “in position” means. The specific location of “in position” will differ from game to game and play to play, depending on where your opponent is best at prosecuting their offense. Being ten feet from the basket on the left side may be exactly the right place on one play and exactly the wrong place on another. No matter where a defender is called to go, however, two basic principles apply a vast majority of the time.
Principle 1: You want to stay between your man and the basket.
This is especially important, of course, if your man has the ball. Letting a guy get a clear path to the hoop with the ball is one of the most obvious no-no’s in the game. Even if you have a defender backing you up it’s likely he’ll be at the dribbler’s mercy once the guy picks up a full head of steam. There are certain exceptions where you try to control the direction of a player’s progress to the basket but in general the rule is to stay between the ball and the rim. This is also generally true when you’re guarding a player who doesn’t have the ball. If you position yourself outside of the direct line between the player and the basket you leave open the possibility of the guy receiving a pass and having nobody to stop him. When you get out of position like this offensive players will usually cut straight towards the basket, making the pass easy and obvious and putting your coach’s naughty vocabulary on full display.
Principle 1a: Stay in between your man and the ball.
This supplements the first principle. In addition to impeding the path to the hoop, you want to make it as difficult as possible for your man to receive the ball. This is often described as “Ball-You-Man”, delineating where you are supposed to be relative to the ball and the offensive player you’re guarding. Nothing will make a defense crumble quicker than free-flowing passes because each pass makes the critical space on the floor change, thus straining the defense as it attempts to keep up. The defender wants to get a hand near every pass. This forces the offensive player to retreat from the defense (and thus from the basket) to even receive a pass…conceding ground before he even gets to make his move, robbing momentum and giving the defender and his team a better chance to adjust.
When you combine these two principles you begin to understand that there are specific places a defender has to position himself relative to his man on each play. When defending a guy without the ball on the perimeter you want to position your body between him and the basket and be close enough that one of your hands is sticking out into the passing lane between him and the ball. When defending a guy down in the post with his back to the basket you want to be snuggled up tight against his back, keeping your body between him and the rim, poking one arm through or around him to deny the pass. There are variations and exceptions but generally you begin to see that a matter of inches and proper versus improper technique can mean the difference between success and failure defensively.
Proper technique and positioning allow you to maximize the amount of critical space you can control. The cardinal sin of defense is controlling space that’s unimportant. The most obvious way this happens is getting behind a play. When people talk about a team not getting back in transition defense what they mean is the team isn’t controlling enough space between the ball and the rim. They don’t have enough defenders back to control the space necessary to prevent the offensive players from making a successful attack. This also happens in a halfcourt offense when a perimeter player gets blown by. At the point the offensive player goes past him he is now controlling space behind the player when all of the critical space is in front. One of the first rules of solid post defense is not to gamble for steals. You might actually make the steal one play in ten. The other nine times you’ve moved around the offensive player and thus left the space between him and the basket. If you miss the steal and the pass gets through there’s nobody in that critical space between him and the rim and you’re left defending empty air.
The Basics of Individual Defense
A good defensive player is one with the aptitude for controlling space. This can be broken down into physical abilities, mental attributes, and technique.
Several physical attributes assist a player in controlling space. The age-old one in basketball is height. The taller you are the more vertical space you control. In the modern day we’ve added “length” to this, meaning generally arm span. Getting your hands up and out helps control vertical and horizontal space. Bulk and strength can be useful. Part of controlling space is not getting moved out of it. Players who can take a bump without getting blown out of a play are an asset, as are players who can bump others and make them move. Quickness is a vital component of defense. Note that pure footspeed is generally less important than agility and lateral quickness. Unless you’re flat-out streaking back in transition to shut down a layup you seldom get to run very far in a single direction in basketball, especially on defense. You can be quick as a bullet train going straight ahead but if you can’t change directions quickly the opponent is going to get you going one way, reverse his direction, and use your own speed against you as you sail right by the play. You’ll often see players who look very quick on the drive on offense who are also generally poor defenders. Leaping ability can be factored in but it tends to be overrated by fans. You can make spectacular plays trailing on the break if you can jump high. You can also get some blocks coming to help. Seldom do you see an extraordinary leap affect a shot in other situations. The offensive player, with the advantage of acting, usually has their shot away before the defender can reach the apex of their jump. Plus because shots arc, the distance between defender and shooter requires the defender to jump correspondingly higher than the shooter to affect the shot. This is rare even for the springiest jumpers. Then there’s always the old pump fake to hoist the high leaper on his own petard. Of more value is the guy who can jump decently but quickly, returning to the floor with alacrity, ready to make another defensive move.
Any or all of these physical assets can be useful, though few players possess them all. Defense is a matter of using what you’ve got.
That brings us to the mental side. Good defenders usually have a steely attitude, much like a homeowner defending his property or an older brother guarding his baby sister’s honor. Nobody is going to break me down. Nobody is going to get in my house. You pull out that ball anywhere near my sister and I’m gonna kill you. Whether you’re a boisterous menace or a silent, competent assassin the right attitude goes a long way towards making up for any lack of physical attributes. Defenders need to be tenacious. They need to want to defend and take pride in it. Understanding the game really helps too. Good defense is about anticipation: anticipating what your opponent tends to do, anticipating what he needs to do in this situation, then taking it away from him. Because they understand what’s going on veteran players tend to defend better than younger players even though the younger ones have physical advantages. Defense also takes a measure of unselfishness. It’s not a stat-intensive endeavor. It doesn’t bring the same big bucks as scoring 20 a night. You’ll spend a fair amount of time helping out your teammates…committing yourself to not making mistakes of your own and simultaneously vowing to help clean up theirs even if it costs you energy or gets you into foul trouble. A ton of NBA players have the physical tools to be great defenders. Few end up reaching that plateau because of the mental discipline, heart, and sacrifice it requires.
Technique refines the physical and mental gifts and allows the player to make the best use of them. Specific techniques differ by position and situation but some generalities cross the board. Balance is a key to defense. You never want to get caught leaning one way or the other lest your opponent cut the opposite direction. To this end it’s important to slide defensively rather than picking up your feet to step all the time. Sliding keeps both feet in the vicinity of the floor at all times, allowing you to move either direction. Stepping requires keeping one foot off the floor, limiting your mobility. A defender wants to keep a low center of gravity. On the perimeter this makes it easier to move in any direction, including vertically. When you’re low you have to move instead of leaning. On the inside being lower gives leverage. No defender is more vulnerable than the one standing straight up with his feet close together.
In the NBA more than any other league in the world it is critical to move your feet on defense. If you try to play defense with your hands more than your feet you will constantly be leaning and reaching. Opponents are too quick, too smart, and too strong in the hands for your reaching to have any effect. You’re going to get driven by, pick up a foul, or both. If they are anywhere in the vicinity of the ball defenders should not stand still or let their feet come to a complete stop. (I’d say they shouldn’t any time but that’s too much to hope for I suppose.) Not relying solely on your hands doesn’t mean they’re useless, however. Arms should generally be away from the body, extended into the passing lane. If you’re guarding a stationary offensive player without the ball that usually means having them outward, with your passing lane hand in the classic Supremes “stop” position. When cutting or when defending a player with the ball having the hands up and out is usually the rule. Many NBA players keep their hands at their sides on defense, which is not considered great technique.
A fair amount of defense is also played with the hips, knees, and elbows. This part is often underrated by fans because it happens quickly, subtly, and usually away from the cameras. Sit underneath the bucket and watch some of the action in the key and you’ll get an eyeful. One of the first rules of NBA defense is not to let a cutter go by without bumping him. It’s akin to letting an NFL wide receiver get off the line untouched. You want to slow cutters down, alter their course, and generally make it unpleasant for them to run through your defense. When defending down in the post you want to bump, gouge, and use your forearm and lower body for leverage to root your man out of position. This is part of the reason an NBA team cannot afford to be too nice if it wants to be good defensively. Punishment is an integral part of the defensive game. It’s not overt, it’s not to injure. You just want to make your opponent as uncomfortable as possible. You want him thinking about something else besides finishing the play. You want him to remember you’re there and that you don’t like what he’s trying to do.
Wrap-Up on the Basics
The original question was how you could tell your team was playing decent defense. The summary so far:
--Watch who appears to be controlling the space on the floor, especially the critical middle space.
--Know the opposing players and watch to see if they’re getting shots in their comfort zone.
--Keep track of how many shots are contested.
--Watch to see how easily passes are being made.
--Watch to see if your guys are staying in between the ball and the basket in all situations.
--When watching individuals, see if they are remaining on balance, moving their feet, keeping their arms up, and anticipating where the play is going.
--Watch to see how freely opponents are able to move without the ball, especially on cuts through the lane.
Next Time
Next time we’ll cover some of the more advanced concepts like passing angles, man-to-man versus zone, defending pick and rolls, help and rotation, closing out, and the differences specific players can make.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
12 recs |
64
comments
Comments
Good stuff
It’s funny cause for once, in almost 5 years im not worried about the Blazers offense, but wonder if our defense will be strong enough to sustain a really solid winning season.
We have the talent to dominant on both ends of the floor, in my opinion. Its just a question of how much certain players are willing to sacrifice to be triumphant in a role they may not have seen them selves in before this team was built.
Man I love tongue tacos - Mortimer
Only thing better is Trout on a stick roasted over an open fire - annthefan
I have a pic like that of my dog - tominhawaii
by Outlaw is Rejector on Sep 23, 2008 1:14 AM PDT 0 recs
Ya that was good
Thank you so much. That is some good info.
If you don’t mind me asking how long did that take to write?
by AndrewJ on Sep 23, 2008 1:53 AM PDT 0 recs
Let's see
Blazers won in ’77… a little over 31 years. (C=
—Dave
by Dave on
Sep 23, 2008 1:04 PM PDT
up
0 recs
cool...
it only took me 15 years to read…=P
Every child must be encouraged to get as much education as he has the ability to take. We want this not only for his sake-but for the nation's sake. Nothing matters more to the future of our country: not military preparations-for armed might is worthless if we lack the brain power to build a world of peace; not our productive economy-for we cannot sustain growth without trained manpower; not our democratic system of government-for freedom is fragile if citizens are ignorant.
-President Lyndon B. Johnson
by saregister on
Sep 23, 2008 8:53 PM PDT
up
0 recs
much appericated dave!
i like this kind of stuff because i’ve developed a decent understanding of the game from watching for a few years but there is definitely a bit of that hardcore fundamental stuff that escapes me still because i never really played the game myself in school or anything. (kicking myself forever for not playing. was always a musician instead.)
by avalonzero on Sep 23, 2008 2:18 AM PDT 0 recs
Clear, Concise, Clever
Thanks for laying this all out. I loved watching Ruben play, by the way. You could always count on him dunking, hussling and diving for loose balls. He played with all heart and I was sorry to see him go and miserable seeing him sit on the bench.
by dvcastle on Sep 23, 2008 2:26 AM PDT 0 recs
yes
he had no discipline, as Dave states, but the guy did disrupt a lot of things the offense was trying to do….It was just a pleasure to see the hustle (on a team that had none). The guy was effective, no doubt about it. he was not a smart player, but he did know what he could do to help the team.
Dave has the ultimate assessment of the philosophy of defense and I sure do appreciate such a great analysis… When he brought up Ruben, it got me thinking about what’s inside of a player….you can never understate shear desire to play hard (Ginobli sp)….A lot of times the best laid plans break down and then player instincts have to take over( frenzied defense is better than no defense)……Did Ruben do more harm than good? Probably, but it was better than not contributing anything.
One other item about defense….When I played ball, my coach would always emphasize, that the first step in good defense was to stop the ball (player with the ball that initiates the offense) If you can break this down you have gone a long way towards changing the offensive plan. in other words the defense gains the advantage before the offense can get in to what they are trying to do…..The beginning of the so-called “perimeter defense” (Get the shot clock down and force the team into 2nd, 3rd, or no options)
This was probably covered by Dave in some form or another, but when you get something drilled into you, like I did, it ends up as one of my philosophies of defense.
by 67 on
Sep 23, 2008 9:45 AM PDT
up
0 recs
As you say this
I realize that I may have mis-stated things a litte, which brings up another wrinkle.
I don’t think Ruben did more harm than good on defense really, though the way I stated things made it seem like I was saying that. Ruben was actually a good defender. But the thing is, you have to be a good defender conistently…meaning the coach has to be able to count on you. Putting Ruben in during a critical situation was kind of a coin flip, which coaches hate. There were a ton of reasons he never found a permanent NBA home despite his talent, most of which had to do with other things besides his defense. But he is a good example of how it’s not always the guy who’s jumping around who’s following the defensive scheme.
—Dave
by Dave on
Sep 23, 2008 10:05 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I understood what you were saying about Ruben
I agreed with your assessment, but could not escape without commenting on his style of play. It was entertaining and often sparked a rather lackluster team. Ruben was an example of hustle, but a poor fit for team building. He never had control of his emotions.
This years team has so much more going for it. It has the character and the talent you can build a team with….If you want to throw in some Ruben intensity and hustle then, I, as a fan, won’t mind.
In other words, I would like to see more of that from the Blazers. It’s hard to put into words, but watching players hustle will always keep me a fan. (Diving on the floor for a loose ball will usually get you on your feet.) This view may be too narrow, because I have to stop and realize that these players are professionals. So your defensive analysis is a definite part of what they need to do and is what the coaches are looking to achieve… Sorry for straying somewhat from your post, which is great information on defense.
by 67 on
Sep 23, 2008 11:07 AM PDT
up
0 recs
he also often
sparked lackluster fans. He at list did something.
""I am tired after all the travel, but after seeing the fans I just felt like heading straight to the gym to begin practicing." - Rudy 9.22.08
by jorga on
Sep 23, 2008 1:09 PM PDT
up
0 recs
least, not list
""I am tired after all the travel, but after seeing the fans I just felt like heading straight to the gym to begin practicing." - Rudy 9.22.08
by jorga on
Sep 23, 2008 1:10 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Funny you bring up Rub.
I loved his energy. But I remember holding my breath every time he had the ball on a break away. “Please don’t dribble it off your foot, please don’t dribble it off your foot, awwwwww man!” But when he did connect, he could do some cool dunks. I remember some 360’s.
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on
Sep 23, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Thanks, great overview
I have to admit I read the first sentence as “The ever-so-cleverly named "DarthBlazer" wrote last week and asked if we could COMPLAIN a little about defense…”
Freud.
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paint—prairie grass, blown by wind.
by Norsktroll on Sep 23, 2008 2:27 AM PDT 0 recs
I thought I complained more about defense than anyone
Nice to have some company
by southern oregon on
Sep 23, 2008 8:31 PM PDT
up
0 recs
YES!
You da Man on “D”
"You better come harder than that, little man, your makin' me laugh" G.O.
by BlueBooYay on
Sep 24, 2008 7:30 PM PDT
up
0 recs
About time
With all the lofty predictions of a train of championships this is a much needed reminder of the core of the game- to win consistently teams need to play the percentages. Whichever team can push the ratio of good:bad shots to their favor will enjoy sustained success. Coaches can urge their teams toward this goal in two ways: by looking to improve the quality of shots they take or by decreasing the quality of the opponents’ shots.
Having players that can score in pressure situations even when the opposing defense is impeccable (Roy, Outlaw) makes it easy on the coaching staff to obtain good percentage shots offensively almost regardless of the complexity of the offensive sets. Looking to improve here is definitely an admirable undertaking, but in doing so, a team must ensure that any benefit gained in offensive production outweighs any loss on the other end of the floor. To illustrate, giving Roy four dead-on spot up shooters may create an offensive juggernaut, but the production of such a squad is limited to two or three points per possession. If such a line-up couldn’t hold their own defensively, their offensive dominance would be irrelevant (except in certian short-term game situations). To push the ratio of high percentage shots toward the Blazers’ favor requires defensive growth.
The potential for improvement is much greater on the defensive end for Portland, and this will be the key to our desired push toward dominate dynasty of the decade. I am not talking about reducing the points per game of the opposition. This is done easily in the NBA by simply slowing down your own teams’ offense. This is the Jeff Van Gundy method: less possessions in the game= less points scored by the opposition. Unfortunately, this strategy decreases your own points per game, which is obviously (espeically for us fans) undesirable. The last thing you want is for your offense to struggle because of difficulty defensively. Last season, Portland was a jump shooting team that forced few turnovers and was dominated in the paint. Oden and a year-older Lamarcus should be a huge benefit to Joel’s quest to control the space of the high percentage shots- the key. Defensive rebounding was a huge obstacle to the offense last year. Roy commented in a recent interview on Courtside that he and the other guards would have to stay back and help rebound instead of leaking out to look for easy hoops and put pressure on the other teams defense. The big fella’s presence on the defensive glass will aid our offensive efficiency.
Another huge obstacle last season was the lack of turnovers we forced. Neither this nor the rebounding issue were any fault of the coaching staff- they simply designed the offensive/defensive schemes around the personnel they had. The zone defense implemented and acceptance of last years’ squad as a jump shooting team lead to a phenomenal 41-41 record in perhaps the toughest, deepest conference of all time. This year the personnel are different. The more I salivate over this years’ lineup, the more I can see how beautifully our new pieces could fit in (I also begin to wonder how much of this KP planned and how much is luck…). Adding the footspeed and annihilation-tendencies of Jerryd Bayless to our perimeter will help contain the troublesome quick point guards that are the fad these days. Oden will intimitade, compensate for the lapses of others, control the defense glass, and allow Aldridge to quietly become a defensive team leader with his length and mobility ala KG. The other piece that could prove to become just as essential to an effective, responsive defense is Rudy Fernandez. Obviously, he has been the recipient of due flak for his often poor on man on defense. But as Dave points out, man-man defense is a very simplistic way to view things. Rudy comes from a team that lead their league in turnovers forced: turnover ratio. He understands the benefit of taking a risk on the passing lanes- breakaway dunks, easy points, crowd excitement, sportscenter, etc. But even more so is one of the basics Dave points out- the ease of opponents’ ball movement. Keeping the opponents on their toes will lead to timidness in how the players carry out their coaches game plans offensively, disrupt their flow and lead to a lower level of offensive efficiency.
Obviously these new pieces are just that- new. Some time will have to pass for the potential’s full flavor to be reached, but I like what I smell coming from KP’s kitchen. Our superb coaching staff will help speed the process so us loyal fans can enjoy the feast.
By the way- I created a profile to make this post simply to help Dave out on IDing the player the Rudy nailed the pull back three on in his article… It wasn’t Dwayne Wade, rather defensive ace Tay Prince. That message was my only intention, and here I am babbling at 3am… It is amazing what the anticipation of this season can do to you!
by Bonzo on Sep 23, 2008 3:10 AM PDT 4 recs
Your comment ties in well with the discussion on the criticism of Nate
It is Nates job to establish which set of personal will give the teams the best odds in any particular situation. Likewise, he makes the decision on how the Blazers are going to give themselves the best chance to win.
Last year we played a large amount of zone D. He chose to a defensive style that would make other teams take more contested shots at the cost of giving us fewer easy opportunities. IN other words Nate placed more trust in our abitlity to produce on offensive in a half-court set than if we ran the ball and had to defend on the move. That was very smart gamesmanship in my opinion. I think we’ll see more full court presses by the Blazers which will lead to a couple of turnovers. Nate is slowly building the fundamental of a very good defensive team while adding new tools that will give the Blazers a better chance to get a “stop” come crunch-time.
Finally, I ’d like to express thanks to Dave for showing us once again why Bedgei s the best BBall blog. Nobody covers the game as well as the team like you do, Thanks.
by NWfan on
Sep 23, 2008 11:08 AM PDT
up
1 recs
Your statement:
Nobody covers the game as well as the team like you do, Thanks.
is so true.
by TwoDeep on
Sep 23, 2008 7:17 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Great post
rec’d.
Yes, it was Prince. That was when I knew for sure we had a cold-blooded killer in Rudy, when he said, “I don’t care if it is the best defender in the world guarding me, I’m going to score. If he won’t give me a drive, then I’ll just knock down this three pointer in his face.”
Good comments on pace. Pace does have a role to play in the discussion. Some teams actually do defend better in a slower paced game. Generally, a slow game improves everyone’s defensive efficiency, because you aren’t giving up fast-break layups. But some teams improve more than the average in a slow game.
If you have poor man defenders, a slow-paced game can hurt you, because the other team takes the time to exploit those weaknesses. If you have very quick and athletic help defenders who can block shots (like Oden, Aldridge, Outlaw) it may be to your benefit to up the pace defensively with a trapping, gambling defensive scheme. You’ll get some steals leading to easy buckets, and you’ve got a decent chance that your mistakes will be erased by a blocked shot.
The key with pace is not whether it changes your points allowed (as you rightly pointed out), or even whether it improves your offensive or defensive efficiency. The key is whether the change in pace results in a net positive improvement in overall efficiency.
I agree that Nate did a superb job in developing offensive and defensive schemes and in dictating the pace to fit our strengths well last year. The amazing thing is that he put it all in place so quickly, because everything changed when Greg went down. That was a factor in our very poor start last year — finding the right schemes.
It is going to be very interesting to see what he does this year.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Sep 24, 2008 12:59 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Thank you!
Dave, I can’t tell you how much I enjoy reading stuff like this. It’s interesting in its own right…
… but it REALLY helps out my personal game at the Y!
Alas, I can’t really get “low on defense” very comfortably any more. But I’m going to sharpen the elbows now—thanks to your tutorial—and make some things “uncomfortable” for people!
by Phizbin on Sep 23, 2008 7:00 AM PDT 0 recs
Actually
nobody is particularly comfortable getting low on defense.
That’s why defense is such hard work.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Sep 24, 2008 1:01 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Dat's the Truth
"You better come harder than that, little man, your makin' me laugh" G.O.
by BlueBooYay on
Sep 24, 2008 7:31 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I find it funny that I was pondering
Sending you an email requesting some edumacation for the masses. With the slow news, things like this make good filler and with all the newbies joining us (welcome) and others who are still learning and need refreshers… well, it just seemed like a good time.
I think other educational articles would be good. Pick and rolls, pick and pops, requirement for fast break, and so on. Articles like this help us look at the game with a different set of eyes. Sometimes you can intuitively pick-up that “that doesn’t look right” but articles like this help put the finger on what’s wrong.
Things like this are why I come here.
thanks dave.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Sep 23, 2008 8:21 AM PDT 0 recs
and when i read further
You already stated what you’re going to talk about next.
You’re on the ball man.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on
Sep 23, 2008 8:30 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Thanks Dave!
Nicely done. There’s a couple Blazers who could learn something by reading this.
1,245,648 seconds until first preseason game!
by DarthBlazer on Sep 23, 2008 9:32 AM PDT 0 recs
How much of defence is reputation?
Great stuff Dave, as always. But it got me thinking, how much of being a top shelf NBA defender is reputation? Was Jordan a all NBA 1st team defender because he was just that good, or did he get away with holding, clutching and grabbing because he was M.J?
Bruce Bowen is probably a better example of my point. He alone has in some regards revolutionized NBA defense ( not for the better I might add ) with some of his tactics. Take for instance, sticking your foot under a jumpshooter, Bowen started that a few years back and now it’s common practice. Bowen is alowed to do what he does in games based on reputation alone, If Outlaw tried it, he’d foul out in 10 minutes!
2-4 the who
by 24thewho on Sep 23, 2008 9:58 AM PDT 0 recs
Where reputation helps
is with the refs. That’s true as a team and as an individual. Bruce Bowen, having established himself, is going to be able to do things that Rudy Fernandez will not. This is less true nowadays than 10 years ago, but it still holds. Also being a veteran helps. Veterans know how to hide things better. When a rookie tosses an elbow it looks like the WWE. Apparently vets have all kinds of sneaky tricks that they teach to each other, and I’d give my left arm to hear some of them.
Jordan was a legitimately great defender though…like he was at everything else basketball-related. I do agree that in general stars tend to have their defense overrated. Jordan was the man though. It’s taken me 16 years to admit that, but the old wounds have healed enough to allow it.
—Dave
by Dave on
Sep 23, 2008 1:08 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Here are some that KG uses in case you didn't read it
“My tricks are all advanced. A lot of people don’t have the arm length, strength, or quickness to pull my tricks off. One of the dirtiest but coldest tricks, I forearm the guy in the chest, rip the ball, then keep going with it. It’s a foul, but it’s a very, very technical and advanced move to pull off without getting the foul called. Other tricks are stepping on the guy’s feet, holding his hand, then knowing when to let go at the right time so it’s not a foul.”
http://sports.espn.go.com/videogames/news/story?id=3591949
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paint—prairie grass, blown by wind.
by Norsktroll on
Sep 23, 2008 1:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
That was a great read
I kept waiting fpr the physicallity portion, even in basic high school basketball coaches will tell what shoulder or forarm to bump as a player is blowing past you. I had a coach that insisted on bumping a players oppisite side on a drive or follow his dribble on the low side to disrupt his rythem. Sounds easy but they know where there going and if you guess wrong there shooting 2.
by Dragonage on
Sep 23, 2008 10:17 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I'm sorry Dave.
I’m sure this is an awesome post, but I can’t read it now. I’m too amped over Rudy being in town for keeps.
I’ll get to it in a day or two, once I settle down a little.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Sep 23, 2008 10:11 AM PDT 0 recs
Oden captures on
a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h 7 and 8
Game over.
"I think that the team that wins game five will win the series. Unless we lose game five."
Who else? Charles Barkley
by prezofdeath on
Sep 23, 2008 10:47 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Defensive stop
K*be gets loose and drives for a dunk, but is stuffed by Oden coming across the lane. Is still holding onto the ball as he falls on his back out of bounds.
No matter what Dave says, we need a defensive stop.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Sep 24, 2008 1:06 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Dave
Just curious: What is your experience playing/coaching basketball? You seem to know a lot but I’m curious where and how you’ve learned.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on Sep 23, 2008 10:48 AM PDT 0 recs
This is wonderful, Dave, very informative and educational.
It’s exactly the kind of stuff I need to understand the game better and to understand why the players position themselves the way they do, or don’t. Also, if I have to go back to only listening to games this is the kind of stuff that will help me envision what’s happening on the floor. You’re the best.
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
by annthefan on Sep 23, 2008 10:56 AM PDT 0 recs
Can I get a little love from the ladies?
It’s always Dave this Dave that, Dave Dave Dave! This essay was my idea and wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for me.
by DarthBlazer on
Sep 23, 2008 11:17 AM PDT
up
0 recs
A hint for you
The ladies are usually more interested in the guy who has the initiative and brains to bring an idea to reality than some guy coming up with ideas in his pajamas in his Mom’s basement. It’s tough, but that’s life.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Sep 24, 2008 1:08 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Wow, that's scary!
How did you know I’m wearing pajamas and living in my Mom’s basement?
by DarthBlazer on
Sep 24, 2008 4:07 AM PDT
up
0 recs
That's better than
not wearing pajamas and living in your mom’s basement.
—Dave
by Dave on
Sep 24, 2008 11:34 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Sometimes
I like running around with my lightsaber, it’s very liberating.
by DarthBlazer on
Sep 24, 2008 2:31 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Thanks, Dave. Good stuff.
I also learned two new words: alacrity and petard.
superfluous
by lukeyhere on Sep 23, 2008 11:06 AM PDT 0 recs
Droppin droppin science...
Dave, this is some spectacular stuff. I’m a bball noob, really only started following the Blazers two seasons ago, and I watch with my two daughters, both 10 right now. They ask me all kinds of questions about whats going on in the game and most of the time I have to respond with, “Ah, this is new to me too!” So this gives me tons of ammunition now to keep their minds busy during games. Thank you!
by conspirator5 on Sep 23, 2008 11:12 AM PDT 0 recs
truehoop quoted this at length-- props Daver
Is it 10/7/08 yet?
by 50backflips on Sep 23, 2008 11:35 AM PDT 0 recs
Outstanding post...
…………………………………..but it could use a few pictures to break things up a little.
"TominHawaii's real name is Hubert and he's a rancher in Burns."
by timbo on Sep 23, 2008 12:55 PM PDT 0 recs
I know
I suck at pictures. I wish I could do diagrams. I need them badly for the more advanced part. I do technology like Zach Randolph plays defense.
—Dave
by Dave on
Sep 23, 2008 1:03 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Maybe a few
YouTube clips of good/bad examples. Or even stills. I remember you using a photo I’d taken at a pre-season game last year to illustrate some bad positioning. I hadn’t noticed – I was only trying to get a picture of LaMarcus :-)
""I am tired after all the travel, but after seeing the fa


