Mark Cuban, Josh Howard, and Racism
Mark Cuban did something a little unconventional today. After the youtube video of Josh Howard saying that he wasn't going to celebrate the national anthem because he was black, Cuban received many e-mails from people. Some of these e-mails Cuban stated were filled with "hatred and ignorance." So Cuban decided to post some of the more offensive e-mails with the senders e-mail address on his http://blogmaverick.com/. He later took down the post this evening.
I don't know how many of you saw the e-mails, but I did. And I can tell you there were quite a few that used the n-word in various forms and even compared Howard to Islamic terrorists.
Now these e-mails may not have quite delved to the depths of several youtube comments. But they are disturbing nonetheless...and yes, somewhat shocking...I guess I live in a pollyannish world. But I digress...
I am not writing this post as an endorsement of Josh Howards views, but rather to ask...was Mark Cuban justified in posting these e-mails with those e-mailers address? And who is the bigger villian...Josh Howard or the E-mailers?
324 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'd say "hatred & ignorance" trumps a lack of patriotism
No contest, there.
As for Cuban’s decision to post the racist comments—complete with email addresses—I guess that was well-intentioned. But maybe he’d have done better to just post the email addresses with a note stating, “All of these emailers used the N-word in viciously criticising Josh Howard’s constitutionally-protected use of free speech. In so doing, they made clear why some Black Americans—such as Josh—are less than all-out in their rah-rah patriotism.”
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on Sep 19, 2008 6:41 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
hatred and ignorance trump lack of patriotism?
I would argue that ignorance and hatred along with blind nationalism, at least that is what is passing for patriotism these days, has brought this country to a severely weakened state. I think it is good to see people in a position where their voices can be heard talking about the problems with America. It is not as good as Ali’s comments on the matter, but having people recognize that the government in its present state is not representing them or their community and trying to take action, whether you think that action is right or not, is a positive step to making our government accountable to the people.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
I'm pretty sure that's what he was saying
“hatred & ignorance” = evil
“lack of patriotism” = not really that evil
hey
there is nobody that dont hate something in this world. Imnot saying its good but to say only white people hate is BS. Patriots are those soldiers that fight the terrorists all of us are just critics and want to be patriots or want to be nice gyus that are against patriotism. Josh Howrd showed that he hates this country cuz the song was made by a white patriot, and Josh is not white and not a patriot. But why say what he said? He thinks that white people make him sing that national anthem? Like me I dont like rap. But i dont have to say stupid things about blacks and all of that? Or should I reverse what he said and say it towards blacks about their rap? And then anybody that start calling me names for it,you gyus can say that those people are raicists?
i hate
this stupid double standard. anytime some white dude say something stupid every body call him racists. and any time some other color skin dude say something stupid we try to find out why he said it. We try to understand why would Josh Howard would say something like that. I dont care if you dont like the truth.
Uh, the "white dudes" called Howard the N-word
That’s usually a pretty good indicator that they’re racist. You could argue that we should be trying to figure out WHY they’re racists—as some are trying to figure out why Howard apparently isn’t very patriotic. But to deny their obvious racism is illogical.
The question posed by the poster was which is worse—vicious racism or an expressed lack of patriotism (i.e., not getting excited about hearing the national anthem). There’s no “double standard” in saying that racism is worse. Remember, Howard didn’t say, “I hate white people”—let alone call them a name meant to dehumanize them.
Speaking of that, the remarkable thing is that most Black people—probably including Howard—DON’T hate white people—despite the fact that their race was first enslaved, then systematically discriminated against for hundreds of years by white Americans.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on Sep 20, 2008 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Sometimes when someone speaks their thoughts
it unleashes a chain reaction that the only outcome is destruction…once you throw the first ping pong ball on a table full of mousetraps loaded with their own ping pong ball….you start something you cannot stop until all the traps have released their ball….So if the first ball doesn’t get tossed, nothing happens, including this discussion. That’s total lack of respect and just plain ignorance for what can happen once you drop the ball as Howard did……everything else is just a product of that ignorance…lots of people have little patriotism and don’t care about the anthem, but Howard seemed fit to privy his race and therefore increased reaction to his comments by about 90%
You can pretty much believe that from Howard on down people believe exactly what they say. Everyone knows we still have race prejudice all over the world and it will continue. There is absolutely nothing we can do about it since it’s a persons choice to expel their thoughts….or even use it as a reason to be a jerk.(or jerks)
by 67 on Sep 21, 2008 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions
I think I saw a commercial about this once.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
Walt Disney's Wonderful World of Color
This is where i got it from…when I was a kid, I watched the program, in which they were explaining splitting atoms in an atomic chain reaction.(nuclear fission). It was quite a display
by 67 on Sep 24, 2008 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't care about a "weakened state" per se...
I’m more interested in a strong global community, not necessarily American greatness.
But I agree that this country needs to recognize its problems and fix them, since we’re probably still in the best position to help make the world a better place.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions
I think Howard and Cuban were dumb
But that is nothing compared to the earbeating the hate mail trash need,I will decline to rant other than to wish them a swift exit from the gene pool.
by southern oregon on Sep 19, 2008 6:55 PM PDT reply actions
Yep, you can't become a monster in order to defeat a monster...
Hate is a terrible response to hate.
Maybe they should have sent emails inquiring why Howard feels the way he does. Seeking understanding is the only way to overcome hate.
It was interesting to me
how the comments basically confirmed Howard’s point. Personally I chalked up Howard’s comment to a guy just saying something he probably didn’t think about as far as public ramifications. People do that from time to time. Mostly I couldn’t care less about such statements unless the guy is important somehow and/or his words have a tangible result (other than getting people angry). To me Howard doesn’t rise to that level of importance. I found the responses far more vile.
Just a reminder…even one comment employing that kind of racist jargon gets you banned from Blazersedge. And please don’t turn it into an academic issue by saying, “What if I used those words in THIS context?” To many people in this world the issue is far from academic. A sports blog is no place to parse that particular distinction.
—Dave
Also see
Jscot’s fanshot on this subject from a couple days ago.
—Dave
http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/9/17/616545/josh-howard-stupid-again
Howard's comments
As much as I disagree with what he said, I understand it to be his right to express himself however he see’s fit. If he believes he shouldn’t respect the Anthem, so be it, that’s his choice and his right.
The comments that Cuban posted were disgusting and sad. So were most of the comments that were at the end of the ESPN article. I don’t know if people are really that ignorant or they just try and get a rise out of people, considering they are on the internet. Either way, those comments were hard to read without getting pissed off.
Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game
Dave
what if some one said something like this about black music and how it sucks? Nobody would dismis that. Why? Cuz he is white and a racists.
well
at least there is more selection. Not like they everything is in one note and my dog knows more words than that.
oh
im so sorry i hurt some one feelings. We all are so sensitive. Ah this kind of stuff makes me sick. Lets me finish with this: lets grow up man, ya no wa im saing?
you didnt hurt my feelings
I hope the one banjo,two chords,three teeth joke dont hurt yours
by southern oregon on Sep 20, 2008 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Wow.
You’re the one calling people racist?
Take a look in the mirror, buddy.
Jerryd Bayless has two emotions: Kill and Win.
"I think it’s going to be very beautiful game next year."
-Nicolas Batum
by rockingharder on Sep 20, 2008 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions
Indeed, to say nothing of almost every strain of American popular music
Many intelligent listeners will claim Duke Ellington as the greatest American composer in any genre, and it’s a compelling argument-that brilliant gentleman was a tireless innovator to his dying day (a favorite line re: this question-Have you ever tried to hum Charles Ives? I love Ives as well, but I can certainly see the point). To barely scratch the surface, I’d also immediately add Charles Mingus (no stranger to Howard-esque controversy) to the short list of great American composers. I think the claim the jazz is the one truly American art form is valid indeed, and its greatest talents were/are overwhelmingly black players, composers and arrangers.
But moving on to strictly popular music, for all of the griping about hip-hop I’ve heard in similar discussions over the years, I might ask what’s the lily-white alternative to black music which supposedly “sucks”? Mainstream country? Mainstream country is mostly a joke: more like cookie-cutter pop-rock of astonishing banality with the odd fiddle or pedal-steel overdub to cater to its demographic (and BTW, I dearly love REAL country music). Of course, anyone interested in the history of the genre should duly note the pronounced influence of the blues on such country pioneers and legends as Jimmie Rodgers, the Carter Family, and Hank Williams (who in turn helped influence blues/rock titans Howlin’ Wolf and Chuck Berry. All of these geniuses of American popular music all had amazing ears and didn’t let our collectively tortured racial history dilute their inspiration). As the late, great Lester Bangs once pointed out, when the most inspired American popular music isn’t entirely influenced by black artists, it is most often the product of what Bangs termed “cultural miscegenation.” Supposedly “white” popular music like metal (or punk) has many of its deepest roots in the huge riffs and gloriously distorted guitar tones of a great number of masterful black blues artists, which was helped to be brought into mass appeal by a number of talented devotees of that music, both black and white. And frankly, I find a lack of real cultural knowledge of this history to be, well, unpatriotic. Art and culture is one of the most tangible legacies of any society, and we shall be no different in this regard.
by Modal Rounder on Sep 20, 2008 6:28 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I play banjo
And Hank and Willie and old school blues,sorry if i offend any one
by southern oregon on Sep 20, 2008 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Very well said, but I think you're wasting your breath
RipCity appears to be under the impression that Black American music begins and ends with Rap. And I don’t think you’ll succeed in educating him to the contrary.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
I have been playing with the girls
How about you?
by southern oregon on Sep 20, 2008 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't discriminate
whereever a symphony is to be had.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Over and out
dont call me I wont call you,have a nice life
by southern oregon on Sep 20, 2008 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Everybody does.
No exception.
Jerryd Bayless has two emotions: Kill and Win.
"I think it’s going to be very beautiful game next year."
-Nicolas Batum
by rockingharder on Sep 21, 2008 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions
What is 'white' music ?
I thought music was above skin colours…
I also don’t think it’s appropriate to compare a national anthem and a music genre.
About half the music i play
Was written by black folks,I am sure some one considers that exploitation
by southern oregon on Sep 21, 2008 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions
Mark Cuban is clever.
Problem: I have an idiot on my team. Pressure from fans and media is mounting.
Solution: Collect and display emails from other idiots. Original idiot now garners sympathy from fans and media.
yep
He’s not a billionaire because he’s dumb…. that would be a good example of “spinning”….
There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man — with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)
My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.
Season Tix: Section 315, with my sons
Some one can be good at making money
And still be dumb in the common sense of the word
by southern oregon on Sep 19, 2008 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions
black folks have a systemically different view of incidents like this
There is no question that the USA has a racist history. Very racist and ugly. The average black person in this country is fully aware of this history.
If we concede (which I’m not sure we necessarily should) that the national anthem is inextricably tied to the awful racist side of our history, then comments and attitudes like those expressed by Mr. Howard are fully understandable.
And I don’t begrudge those attitudes and comments at all, coming from someone such as Howard — who undoubtedly experienced racist hostility throughout his childhood (and continues to experience it in more subtle forms throughout adulthood).
Winning is everything.
You think he is old enough to get over it?
I know he’s too young to remember…… and it is not likely he faced the hostilities his grandfather or a generation before had to endure….he is a young immature person who uses his skin color as an excuse to be a jerk. His race faced a lot of adversity, and paid the price so he could move on from here ..Howard is the recipient of an overwhelming sacrifice by his forefathers and a free country that does not condone racism. (yes I know there is still racism, but it’s not the countries fault) I’m not sure that many black people enjoyed being cast into a deformation of character…..in that, Howard seemed to think was consensus enough to include his race as a reason not to honor the anthem..
Gee what about the so-called redeem team that played for ……..The USA…I think the whole team was black and they all stood proud when the anthem was played. All true colors shinning through….Red. White, Blue and Black!
by 67 on Sep 21, 2008 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions
You don't have to be black
to wonder whether “bombs bursting in air” is the sentiment you want to be holding your hand to your heart over.
by raoulduke on Sep 19, 2008 9:05 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
yeah good point RD
but it helps to be black if you want to have a better insight into the street consequences of those bombs and who the flag stands for and which class the wars are always fought on behalf of.
Maybe you should look up the
history of our national anthem to see why those words were used. It had nothing to do with racisim.
I don’t think his issue with bombs has any ties to racism. I think he’s just saying “you don’t have to be black to be wary of our anthem”.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
That's true
but the point still stands that if you know what the history of the song, it comes across differently (hint: it’s not American bombs that are busting in air)
That's also true..
but frankly (and I’m speaking for myself, not RD here), I don’t care WHOSE bombs they are – it’s not necessary to make war a central focus of your country’s essence in song. I’m not necessarily belittling the achievements of the soldiers of the Revolutionary, 1812 or any other American war, but as my main man Mike Gravel is quoted as paraphrasing Ike (no dove himself):
“we should be guided by Eisenhower’s warning that an inordinate emphasis on military power breeds a culture of militarism that threatens other vital areas of our society.”
I can’t say I’m against the hippie wackos who call for America the Beautiful as a replacement.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
Sorry..
I really can’t tell if this is “I agree with you” sarcasm or “you’re wrong” sarcasm – if it’s the latter, to whom do you suggest we surrender?
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
I say Canada.
I’ve always liked their accent….especially “aboot.”
these emailers just prove howards point more.
i assume he didn’t celebrate the anthem because his people (blacks) were and still are mistreated.
the thing i love about the northwest is that most people here are intelligent, polite and tolerant of other races.( the polite part mostly pertaining to wash and oregon)
while i dont respect the fact that howard didnt celebrate the anthem, because i’m a patriotic person. I respect/acknowledge/agree where his view point is coming from.
I don't agree
The anthem itself was written during our revolutionary war, and stands for our fight as a country for freedom. People try to make it stand for more, but I think most of those reasons are a stretch.
Try the war of 1812.
Anyway, what the anthem stands for will vary with the experience of the listener.
I sit corrected
see what I get for going off memory!
We obviously still have a long way to go as a country
That was just disgusting. Those words should never EVER be used, but to send it in an Email? To a stranger??
I believe Cuban did the right thing, and I hope those people get what they deserve, but it really crushed me to see that kind of unthinking vitrol.
Howard is a young, self-entitled millionaire athlete. One of many. No need to bring up race. None at all.
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ." -Gandhi
"Throw Thag, throw. Throw throw throw throw throw throw"- Far Side
by TheThinWhiteDuke on Sep 19, 2008 10:03 PM PDT reply actions 5 recs
Absolutley*
Racism is ridiculous. I mean, if you want to run somebody down that is by far the laziest and most ignorant way to go about it. Those wastes of space and mind just aren’t educated nor articulate enough to put together a legit reason to slam someone. Personally, I think Howard is an idiot, not because he smokes pot or because he’s not down with America (the freedom we covet should allow this thinking whether you agree with it or not) but the guy just needs some self awareness when it comes to the place and time to say your opinions. Hello!!! Probably not a good idea to say things that will offend EVERYBODY when someone has a camera phone in your face. Especially when you are a public figure representing a big time public franchise. Total lack of judgment but to play the racist card in such a despicable fashion like those idiots that Cuban called out makes me sad for people and Americans altogether. It’s just such prejudging reckless hate and it just makes me shake my head. Some of those comments were just awful and I hope that people spammed and flamed those email addresses. I really do. I sort of felt bad for the one at the end from the guy that didn’t even really say anything that bad (especially compared to the others) but sent in the apology once he saw what he was batched in with. This situation overall, just a complete display of school on Saturday. No class.
Why shouldn't you be public about how you feel?
What’s the point of dissent if it’s only acceptable in private? That said, when you are a public figure you can expect public backlash.People who disagree with you will be heard too.
thats right.
I dont say that what they did is good, but why just stop there if Josh Howard is a racists then he attracts other racisits that is in conflict with his statement. I would say that I dont care what they say cuz they are nobodys, but Howard is a racists and hates American anthem.I put my hand on my heart and salute all brave man that are patriots and deffend our contry, cuz if not for them this coutry would be burned down from jelousy. God bless America.
ee cummings had a take worth noting
“next to of course god america i
love you land of the pilgrims’ and so forth oh
say can you see by the dawn’s early my
country ’tis of centuries come and go
and are no more what of it we should worry
in every language even deafanddumb
thy sons acclaim your glorious name by gorry
by jingo by gee by gosh by gum
why talk of beauty what could be more beaut-
iful than these heroic happy dead
who rushed like lions to the roaring slaughter
they did not stop to think they died instead
then shall the voice of liberty be mute?”
He spoke. And drank rapidly a glass of water
by raoulduke on Sep 20, 2008 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
racism is weak period.
i don’t care which side it’s coming from. it just shows that you are ignorant, unintelligent and a waste of oxygen. it’s a sorry way to be. howard is an idiot but he didn’t say anything racist against another race. he just made the anti-anthem because i’m black comment which i think is any american’s right to do whether or not i disagree with it.
I believe Josh Howard is the one who "brought up race."
There are always going to be fringe wacko’s that post over-the-top, nasty comments, especially through a semi-anonymous, and absolutely faceless, medium such as e-mail. “In an Email? To a stranger??” is exactly why those words WERE used. What Cuban did by posting them was designed to be inflamatory and deflect attention from the original issue to get people focused on something else. He has a history of doing that. I mean, look at all the outraged repsonses of “America” to the few emails he could find that were “racist”; whether on his site, or the hundreds of blogs across the Country discussing this, you’re hard pressed to find people defending those remarks, or saying that they are OK. The people that wrote those Emails are trash, and that’s exaclty the place Mr. Cuban should have filed those as soon as he got them. How many level-headed, intelligent, and reasonable responses to the incident did Mark Cuban receive? Hundreds? Thousands? Did he post those? No. He probably didn’t even read them. He sifted through hundreds (at least) of emails to find those that were inflammatory so could he post them online. Why? There’s trash out there that will use racial slurs and hate-speech, but why give that kind of trash a voice? Why give it more power than it really has? What was the purpose here? To “enlighten” an ignorant public that racism still exists in America, by posting a few of the emails you received that were racist and used inflammitory language? Oh, really, thanks for the news Mr. Cuban! Or was it, like I said, to take focus off the original issue and to shift the original debate regarding one the key players on his basketball team? I’m not thrilled or happy about the emails Cuban posted. Just look at this site, nobody is happy about them. Duh. The majority of American’s are offended by racism – including racist comments and language. Posting a few emails, sifting through hundreds to find the “most racist” emails you can find, doesn’t show us anything new or anything we didn’t already know. You mean, there are still a few people in America that will use the N-word?! Oh. My. Gosh. Thank you Mr. Cuban for your brave public service in exposing the rampant racism of America. I’m not shocked by those emails. I am shocked that Mark Cuban decided to give an ignorant and mindless minority such a large platform and voice.
The Dude abides
You just don't know
Who knows how many emails he had to sift through. By the looks of it, he had a pretty large amount of hate mail, which was way more than I’d have ever expected. It was obviously a disturbing response if you ask me. Whether I had thousands of positive responses or not, that was a hell of a lot of hate saturated email.
Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game
I'm not sure how much of a minority it was.
While it is true only the most passionate take the time to post or e-mail, if you take a quick glance at the posts on the youtube video link I have above, you will see a lot of posts with racist language. I just counted 5 out of the first 20 posts with racist language. 20% is not a small minority.
If Cuban’s e-mail inbox was anything like those youtube posts, then he didn’t have to dig too far to find racist content.
wEll
ITs JuSt PuBlic View That WHite boy is A RaCiSt and THey try To make YOu Guity,ThAts HOw tHe lowyers(LIERS) GEt their JOb. Lets MAke It Fair. LETs call JosH HowFart A RaCists LeT Him Be GUilty. Whats GOoD For One SIde Is gOOD For THe Other.
I will get burnt at the stake for saying this
But if life is so hard for Josh why dont he take his huge $’s and move someplace where he could be more comfortable and make better money
by southern oregon on Sep 19, 2008 10:51 PM PDT reply actions
The fact that some Native american in Oklahoma got rich because oil
was found on their land doesn’t erase the history of how they got there. Personal success and social injustice are not mutually exclusive.
Or
Maybe all the people who dislike having to live in a country where people have the right to express unpopular beliefs could move away. Or all the people who tell other people to move away could move away. Or we could all realize that what another person says is their business and not ours. Or we could just talk about it on blogs over and over again. These all sound like good options to me.
Will also get burned at the stake!
X 10,000
Do not have a racial bone in my body, just feel that if you dislike/hate this country so badly,,, LEAVE! I will come help pack your bags.
I do not care if you are white, pink, green, purple or blue. I am sure Venezuela, Russia, Bosnia, or France would love to have you….. and your money. If not for this country and the freedom associated with the National Anthem, and all those “bombs bursting in air” how would he be making millions, just on his ability to put a round ball in a hoop?
Killer instinct. When you have your opponent down, you do not help them up. You step on their throat!!!!!!
by Misplaced Blazermaniac on Sep 20, 2008 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Josh Howard has so much money
that he could probably pay you (or me for that matter) to go live in another country.
If he showed up at your door and said, “I’ll give you $250k a year to live in Russia,” would you do it?
I would.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions
write his agent a letter
saying that we will move there if he pays us $250 grand. St. Petersberg or Moscow?
I say go for St. Pete because it’s more old school, better architecture.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 12:36 AM PDT up reply actions
you said you would do it
don’t back out on me now…
don’t flip-flop on this serious matter.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions
My one sentence commentary on Howard's situation...
Racism will always exist if you give bigots an excuse to hate.
For however much Josh makes a game
Multiplyed by 82 I bet you could find a way to take the money even if you didnt like the intro show.
by southern oregon on Sep 19, 2008 11:08 PM PDT up reply actions
exactly
For what ever your love of hate of America, it is has always been the best system that allows you to get where you want to be if you got the talent or desire. This is just plain talk about maturity or lack of. Howard used his freedom and celebrity to spit in America’s face….look at him when he plays the game…he is just as selfish with his team play as he is with his position as an American….The guy is a jerk and no matter if your black,white,red,brown,or yellow, you have a choice not to be.
i think a bigger question we should ask is: why play the national athem at the beginnning of games?
I think comes down, mostly, to tradition. Is it really all that patriotic to just listen to the national anthem at the beginning of sports games and do nothing else? Frankly, it wouldn’t bother me in the least if they stopped playing the national anthem before games. Cuban was right, publish the e-mails.
by Zaron5551 on Sep 19, 2008 11:14 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Good point
I find the anthem thing boring and would be glad to lose it.
by southern oregon on Sep 19, 2008 11:24 PM PDT up reply actions
I find playing the anthem
at big events is a wonder way to take a moment to think about the sacrifices people have made to give me the freedoms I enjoy today. Maybe Howard should do the same, instead of insulting the very people who died to give him the right to his free speech. I don’t like what he said and I don’t like what the emailers said,
by usmcr3049 on Sep 20, 2008 9:35 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
He's excercising his freedom
Whether any of us agree with what he said or not, he has the right to his opinion. He’s an idiot, get over it. It’s his right to speak his mind. Probably wasn’t the best decision, but that reflects upon him, not you.
Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game
i agree 100%.
Being free and in america and the rights we all covet should allow this thinking whether you agree with it or not.
I have no issue
with him expressing his opinion, I am just offering an opinion as to why his opinion is screwed up, in my opinion, which ofcourse I have every right to express.
based on the first 4 letters of your screen name
yes, you do have a right to express your opinion.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions
yes I was in the Marines
I never saw action, but I was ready to serve if needed. However we all have the same rights, serving doesn’t give me anything more than the bum on the street who doesn’t even pay taxes.
What I really don’t understand is why some Americans hate their country so much. Obama’s wife has stated as much many times, and she is just the most public to do so, I am sure there are many others who share her opinion. I can understand not agreeing with a current administrations actions or policy’s, but that is just one man and his friends, not the entire country! I like Bush as a president, but even if I didn’t, I would still be proud to be an American, and stand in respect when our anthem is played. Too often these type of issues are used to bring attention to causes that are completely different. Howard himself, decided to use the anthem to bring attention to the fact that he is black and his people have been persecuted. Others have used the flag to bring attention to the fact that they opposed a war our country was current involved in, (burning flags, etc..). Our country’s flag, and anthem stand for what our country stands for, Freedom, Right to speak, Right to religious freedom, Right to safety, Right to prosper, any many many more.
Look, the underlying theme with most of these protests, are political, when the flag or the anthem is far from a political tool. America is far from a Nationalistic nation, every person in America, citizen or not, (yes even illegals have the rights given to citizens) has the right to speak out without fear of the government, and we are far from that doomsday scenario.
I know
People don’t have respect for themselves.
And without self-respect, you can’t respect others or your country.
All we are is a bunch of Prozac-laden, dope smoking, fast food eating, gas guzzling, self-centered donkeys.
Howard is like many Americans.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions
while you go a bit far
the simple point is 100% true. in today American’s are not responsible for much of their own actions. We are taught that when we get angry we can kill the person who made us angry, because we are temporarily insane it is not our fault. We teach our kids to hold out their hands and expect to be given everything. Once the hand outs are taken away we don’t know what to do. Much like wild animals who are fed by humans, and then stop hunting to eat because getting hand outs is so much easier. Welfare meant well, but it is now supporting more and more people who will never get off it. As my dad told me, “give a mouse a cookie, it will want a glass of milk.”.
Even our schools are teaching this to our kids at a very early age, respect for each other is not taught anymore, they are afraid of angry parents. Which seems odd really, until we realize that many parents view school as a babysitting service instead of the extention of their child’s education, which should begin with the parents, but all to often is left completely upto the public school system.
the human race (no pun intended) has devolved
There was an anthropologist from a well-to-do family who studied many years at the University of Washington (he rack up a ton of credits, but never got a degree because he thought a piece of paper was worthless).
After studying everything to be known about humans over the last 10,000 years, he decided to test his hypothesis, that humans have devolved.
He moved to Alaska and tried to live as humans did in the Bronze Age. Over several years he discovered that it was impossible to live as we did thousands of years ago. Humans have become a lesser species with the advent of agriculture and modern society.
To make a long story short, he was found with a hand-made granite spearhead impaled in his chest… he killed himself.
We call it progress, but are we glossing over the steps backward?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions
physically we may have "devolved", but humans never got by of succeeded as species because of physical ability.
The human race has succeeded because of our ability to solve problems and utilize technologies to overcome our physical deficiency. So, while we may not be able to live like bronze age people we are very capable of living live modern age people, so it’s hardly any sort of “devolving.” Evolution is about a species succeeding in the environment in which they live in, or in the case of humans to make a environment in which we can succeed. Humans have in no way devolved.
As far the comment about Obama’s wife I suggest the people who really believe she is unpatriotic to actually go read the whole speech she was giving, she gave basically the same speech twice, and stop just accepting what you hear from Sean Hannity or Fox news. What she said was in no way unpatriotic.
As far as people not respecting this country, I would say very few people are actually “unpatriotic.” Instead people, myself included, are very critical of the United States foreign policy. I suggest that people take a world map and identify every country that U.S. has in some way intervened with the governments of those countries. Basically every country in South America has had a ruler overthrown by the CIA (usually resulting a pro corporate interests dictator installed), we have intervened in most middle eastern countries (usually supporting Israel) and frankly we have sent and/or have troops stationed in a large number of other countries. It’s hardly surprising that some people have a problem with the United States. I’m not criticizing everything the United States has done militarily, but there is a reason a large number of people see the United States as a colonist power. I do find it hard to respect a country that takes out the leader of a foreign country simply because he was going to nationalize fruit production and Dole corporation would lose a bunch of money. So, until this country is changed in a very serious way, no I won’t respect it. I’ll love my country and try to make it better, but there isn’t a lot to respect as far as interventionist policy is concerned. And yes, I do respect myself.
I suggest "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins
Your last paragraph pretty much sums it up and I agree with most all of it.
Now, back to the DE-EVOLUTION of humankind… You say that we have adapted to our environment that includes a lot of technologies. I agree, but by “adapting” I mean devolving. We have become slaves to techonogies. As a species, if you strip away our technology, then we wouldn’t survive. If we create conditions where we can no longer depend on our technologies, then we are going TU.
Our technologies may end up being our undoing. I won’t rant about nuclear poliferation or global climate change, but there are many, many scenarios where the things we have created will end up making us go extinct. Therefore, we would have been better off by not devolving in the way we have.
I don’t think the end of humankind is even moderately close. It probably won’t be for hundreds of years. But the trend is apparent.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions
modern man has never been proven to survive with technology
homo-habilis and early step in human evolution actually invented fire, so in fact for the entire existence of man we have had not only stone tools, but also fire. So in essence technology is, and always has been tied directly to the existence of modern man. I guess what you see a devolving is see as a continuation of what humans always have been, user of technology.
TominHawaii is secretly a huge Jazz fan
Yes, of course
It’s just that technological improvement has gone too far (or we have allowed it to help us devolve). Now we’re sol when we can’t figure it out sans technology.
The golden age of Rome was probably the peak for Western civilization. It’s been downhill from there for the West and we’re screwed up every other culture too since then.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions
how so?
Statistically human life has been greatly improved by things like modern medicine, people are more free and generally have a better standard of living all around. If I may say so you seem really pessimistic. I see human life as improved, though certainly in some places living conditions have been completely screwed up.
TominHawaii is secretly a huge Jazz fan
It's easy to say how great things are when
you and I are living in “God’s country”.
But what about all the people who live in Satan’s country (aka, the axis of evil, Sudan, Somalia, and etc.)?
It’s great that people learned how to expand and procreate so successfully and live so long.
But now, instead of 50 million people suffering back when the population was 50.1 million… today we have 1 billion or more people suffering out of 6 billion. The percentage improvement is awesome, but the raw suffering number is terrible. More people suffering today than back then.
My pessimism about the world ending is obviously overblown. But I do think there is a lot of suffering out there today, and some people, like Josh Howard, make so much money they are richer than the Roman emperors.
I’m just frustrated mainly. Not at you, or your point of view, or your arguments. If fact, I think you’ve been mostly right about everything. I’m just frustrated by the world.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions
I understand you frustration and...
I can see why it seems unnecessary for Josh Howard to complain about the national anthem, and really it probably was, but in the end; it’s people like you and me, and all the people that responded with e-mails and youtube comments, talking about it that’s made this a big deal. Really, Josh Howard could’ve said those things we all could’ve said “Wow, I dis/agree,” and left it there. Instead, a whole multitude of people have decided to make this a big issue when really, there was no reason for it to be.
Side note: wasn’t the “official” axis of evil Iraq, Iran and North Korea. It’s not really important, your point still stands, people are suffering in the world. A whole bunch of people are suffering. I agree that overpopulation is a huge problem, but I would say that overpopulation is proof that our species is too successful. We have really outdone ourselves.
TominHawaii is secretly a huge Jazz fan
We've outdone ourselves once again I guess
Yeah, sorry, I meant Iraq, Iran, N. Korea, Sudan, and etc.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 12:26 AM PDT up reply actions
When did Michelle Obama said she "hated" America?
I recall her saying something to the effect that she hasn’t always been proud of America. Not the same thing.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
ya,
I prolly over-stated her remarks, I believe you are closer to being correct. The quote I was referring to was when she said something close to, she was proud of america for the first time, which was said recently. And no hating a country and not being proud of it are not the same thing, sorry for my mistake.
No worries
But I should add that I’m not even sure she even said she was proud of the US “for the first time.” We need to take pains not to get caught up in the heat of this political campaign to the point where we misrepresent what people do and say.
Leave that to Karl Rove, et al. We’re better than that; we’re Blazer fans. Even if some of us are, er, Republicans.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
I found the quote
"For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country," she told a Milwaukee crowd today, "because it feels like hope is making a comeback."
Good job finding the quote
Not nearly as strong as what you initially remembered, if a bit stronger then I’d thought. My point stands, though: Michelle Obama didn’t come close to saying that she hated America.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
right, just cuz my dog does stuff to my carpeting
I may not be proud of him temporarily, but I don’t hate him ever.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 8:26 PM PDT up reply actions
She actually said
“really proud” of my country. It may be parsing words, but I think it squares with her follow up explanation, that she was really proud that so many people were getting involved in the issues and the election.
If that's correct, it IS significant
Hmm—interesting that usmcr3049’s source was “hotair.com.”
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
I've been "sort of proud" and not "really proud" sometimes
does that make me some scary militant black women? No.
This is ridiculous that people actually believe this spin zone junk about who said what. I mean, the reason people believe it is that it fulfills a political message or agenda. Otherwise no one would care.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 22, 2008 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't really care to hear the anthem
If it’s a televised event, but live I really enjoy it.
It’s a tradition that was created before TV, and just doesn’t hold up well. Especially when you have “celebrities” singing it.
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ." -Gandhi
"Throw Thag, throw. Throw throw throw throw throw throw"- Far Side
by TheThinWhiteDuke on Sep 20, 2008 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions
two of my favorite traditions
while on base as a Marine, was the playing of the national anthem at noon everyone on the radio stations, (yes all of them) and the playing of it and every branch of the services song, before movies in the theater. Our history is sometimes proud, sometimes horrible, but it has all brought us to where we are now, we have evolved as a nation morally, what is seen as ok now, or as horribly wrong now, was not view as such 50-100 years ago. Other countries have these same issues with their history, (killing for land, slavery, etc..) yet many of them don’t allow their history to be taught to children in an attempt to sugar-coat it and eventually remove it from their past.
Soon our country will be led by the generation who are now teens and early 20’s, hopefully they understand how to respect our past and learn from it, not try and remove our history in an attempt to make us look better.
I agree: countries manipulate their history, at least I lived it in Spain, usually because of a wrong concept of patriotism.
The Midnight Rambler. Born to make mistakes.
My children were not taught anything about the Viet Nam war in their
history classes.
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
Just like
Japanese kids learn that the American bullys started WW2
by southern oregon on Sep 21, 2008 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Ya I guess
History is written by the victors most of the time. Maybe we should just say, that the human race has issues, instead of individual country’s or races.
I found a link to a copy of the original post if you want to see it
http://locrants.blogspot.com/2008/09/i-love-athletes-and-anti-americanism.html
I also really agree with this bit from Cuban’s take down post:
“I wanted to point out the irony of them experiencing the onslaught of attention from suddenly and unexpectedly being placed in the media spotlight from a throwaway comment.”
Yep!
I’m surprised no one’s brought that up yet – hot-button issues like race and free speech aside, this is absolutely, totally and completely the essence of the situation. In my opinion, of course.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
Many people in Europe have a lot of concerns about patriotism because of the terrible effects of many wars Europe has lived "in the name of patriotism".
It happens with religion too, because of too many religious wars and crimes. Many good things have two faces and I don´t think both faces smile at everybody. So why everybody must react the same way?
The Midnight Rambler. Born to make mistakes.
The competion for resources thing
Is what drives the us against them thing for a long time,sport competion is a safety valve in that way that you can compete without killing the other guy,I hope Bayless reads this.
by southern oregon on Sep 19, 2008 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions
Unfortunately there are consequences.
When right and wrong get so muddled that folks are too guilty to take a stand, too confused to take a stand or too comfortable to take a stand…well that’s when you come home some day to find somebody without these same moral dilemmas living in your house.
Yeah, it´s a very old dilemma with two faces too.
“”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Si_vis_pacem,_para_bellum" target="new">Si vis pacem para bellum" I like better Andrew Carnegie concept: “Si vis pacem, para pactum”. Not that I think pactum is enough. A too much complex dilemma for me.
The Midnight Rambler. Born to make mistakes.
One of the most innate comments in the discussion comes from the one and only Screaming A. Smith in my opinion
Stephen A. Smith: We know Howard can play, but there’s little value in what he has to say.
It’s not filled with ignorance and dumb hatred like many of these YouTube comments and emails to Cuban, but still with vitriol.
He is constantly complaining about young black athletes not standing up and speaking out about inequalities, heavily criticizing e.g. Jordan, LeBron, and Carmelo for keeping mum in order to not threaten their advertising deals. Now here is Howard, an educated black millionaire athlete who apparently does openly speak his mind on topics that bother him and obviously can’t keep mum about it. Probably in a dumb way that doesn’t help his public image and isn’t thought-out enough to get the message across. But instead of waiting a few days and inquiring about why Howard has these deep feelings, Smith instantly felt the urge to write another column trashing him for saying something but not what he wanted to hear. Which way is it, Mr. Smith? Do we want popular athletes to speak up and risk that they say dumb things every once in a while, or do we want them to keep their mouths shut and let elected officials and other representatives of their causes and communities do the talking who might be more qualified?
As for the national anthem, do you think Howard’s teammate Dirk or any other international NBA player for that matter sings it? With passion? He stands out of respect and he should, but e.g. in Europe national anthems are only played before international games, not every unimportant little-league game. Or a charity event were people tried to raise money for worthy causes in their spare time, and unfortunately one of them made a dumb joke waiting around for the game to start.
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paint—prairie grass, blown by wind.
You mentioned a key word
RESPECT…..Howard or S.A. Smith don’t have it. Lots of people have to do things in their lives they may not approve of or like….but having respect for those who do is what it is about. It is a lot different to think something and still have the will to say nothing. You will always have the platform to speak, if so desired…this country gives you that right .
Smith has the platform and he abuses it all the time. He simply uses the national media to cram his thoughts down everyone’s throat..And don’t think for a moment, Howard didn’t embarrass his team (mostly black) and other black people in the USA with childish comments he thought was cute.
by 67 on Sep 20, 2008 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Why ...
do human beings blindly praise intangible things such as national anthems, flags, et cetera?
It’s superpatriotic rubbish in which a person sells out their individualism to a statist institution.
Oh well, people have the inalienable right to mindlessly worship whatever nonsense pleases them.
amen AK
Now, if they hung a copy of the Constitution from the rafters every time they played the Star Spangled Banner, THAT would be something meaningful to stand and express reverence for.
And, oh yes, the Constitution has a little clause in it called the First Amendment, which guarantees all of us the right to sit or stand, praise or denounce.
God bless the United States Constitution.
Ah, but there is good news. It appears the bloom is already off the McPalin rose, the baby bump she gave McCain is already gone, as everyone from here to Wasilla is sick to death of hearing about her. Every day that goes by it comes clearer that the Sarah juggernaut is no juggernaut at all but merely an increasingly disturbing PR stunt, and a bit of a disgrace for John McCain himself, whose once-noble aura of integrity and class has essentially vanished.
A potent backlash is coming fast. Actually, it began almost immediately, just after the Republican National Convention, when the GOP cheerfully announced they'd raised a whopping one million bucks in the 24 hours following Palin's speech, so inspired was the heavily drugged conservative base by her teleprompter-reading skills (she didn't write a single word of her own speech, of course; it came from a former Bushite, well before she was the VP pick).
Why I stand
To me anyway, the flag is the constitution. Since it is not really feasible to hang the constitution from the rafters, the flag (and the anthem) is a good sustitute. I stand.
“And, oh yes, the Constitution has a little clause in it called the First Amendment, which guarantees all of us the right to sit or stand, praise or denounce.” < True statement. I stand for that
“Oh well, people have the inalienable right to mindlessly worship whatever nonsense pleases them.” < Another true statement. I also stand for that
It isn’t always easy, and I don’t always agree, but the 1st amendment is the reason we are even able to have this discusion …..and that is worth standing for.
"I figured out how to get the canoe down the mountain, but I will need a snow blower and all your butter"-Michael Kelso
by 92wastheyear on Sep 20, 2008 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions 4 recs
+1=2
good stuff———We have moved to politics on a sports blog, but Howard did bring it up. It’s too bad we have to defend our country for those who don’t respect it……Where else would they like to live and prosper?….Almost everyone in America has a gripe about something, but if you put it in the right perspective, it always comes out feeling better.
Most of the world does not like America, but individually, if you offered them citizenship, they would take it in a heartbeat. They don’t like us because we have what they don’t. The athletes come here for the opportunity to make money off their skills…students come here for the education….Poor, suppressed people come here for a better quality of life…..it is a land of opportunity and there is no other like it.
Howard has taken the opportunity (and his celebrity) to be a jerk………..But he is not alone
by 67 on Sep 20, 2008 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm just wondering if there are any countries that are
ALMOST as good to live in as the USA?
A couple of countries come to mind
I would think that living in Canada would be pretty similar to living the the USA. And the Nordic countries (Sweden, Norway, Finland) tend to rank highly in international studies of things like standard of living, health care, crime, et al, so they probably are comparable as well.
Those other countries ...
As long as you believe there aren’t any threats to our freedoms or don’t care if nations like Israel or Taiwan or whatever small country is threatened by others. All the “near-abroad” countries around Russia can hardly count on Canada or Sweden, Norway, Finland or any other nation on the planet to help them out for any reason whatsoever.
There is one reason (and only one) that we aren’t under some form of authoritarian rule. That reason is the United States of America.
And we are hated for it. Especially by our own people (like Josh Howard and especially Mark Cuban).
I don't know if the question is serious
but if it is…
Do you believe countries such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, most of Europe just to name a few are worse to leave in as far as :
-freedom of speach
-security (a lot of people in Europe for instance are very concerned and worried about the number of guns in the USA, the 2nd amendment thing…)
-equality between classes, welfare state…
-media freedom (I’d say it’s a common story here, most of the medias self-sensor themselves, mostly for economical purposes)
-minimum and average rage (countries like Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark for instance provide far more money and better conditions of life to their lower classes
Well, my point is not to say that the USA is a bad country, I LOVE so many things there…
But to wonder if there is in the world a country where it could nearly be as good to leave in as the USA… Wow !
I’d say it’s better to leave in the USA than in 80% of the world, but then that it’s about the same as in the other 20%, with some countries providing much more equality and security…
Europe
Don’t know how often you get over there, but I find Europe pretty 3rd-worldish. I find their marketplaces paltry and their facilities leaving much to be desired. I sent my mom and my eight nieces over there for the summer and they had similar observations.
The main difference is the security load America shoulders. It is as though we are the adult and the rest simply play in our playground. If not for us, the world would be under authoritarians … none of the rest of them have either the will or ability to keep anyone safe.
Give me a break!
We’re the grownups taking care of the “children?” Hmm: how many grown-ups do you know who are up to their eyeballs in debt to their kids! This is the type of attitude responsible for the United State’s rapidly deteriorating postion in the world. And for the record, that postion came about in the wake of WW II— namely because that war had been fought on other continents. Much of the rest of the world was devastated, and we were virtually unscathed.
Since then, yes, the US has had a dominant presence militarily around the world. But do you think we extend ourselves like that strictly out of the goodness of our hearts and our love of freedom? Boy, you’ve been drinking the Kool Aid.
The US extends its military power mainly to protect its “interests”—e.g., Middle East oil. Africa is full of Saddam Husseins, but do you see us invading those nations? Uh, no. They can slaughter their people to their heart’s content, as long as they don’t have something we want and need.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on Sep 21, 2008 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I know what you meant
but the quote, “wake of WW II— namely because that war had been fought on other continents. Much of the rest of the world was devastated, and we were virtually unscathed.”
The US lost thousands of lives, in the war, both abroad and at home in Hawaii. To belittle the cost of the war because the European theater was fought is a little…rude. Everyone who was involved in WW2 suffered greatly, there is no scale of suffering on death, ask any grieving mother.
I don't think you DO know what I meant
Either that, or you’re intentionally misconstruing my statement. I didn’t belittle—or even refer to—the human cost of WW II (which was incalculable, for the US as for all the other combatants). I was pointing out an often-cited historical fact: that the US emerged from the war virtually unscathed ECONOMICALLY AND INDUSTRIALLY.
Read the context of my remark again: I was suggesting that the US didn’t become the dominant superpower it is today (the “grown-up” of the world, according to dvcastle) strictly because of our unique national virtues. We emerged from WW II as the ONLY superpower, because all the other industrialized nations were devastated. Add to that the fact that, in gearing up for war, our dormant economic and industrial potential had been unleashed, and the US was poised to go on a long winning streak.
But everything is cyclical, and our country is now looking at hard times. Under Bush, we’ve gone from the world’s greatest creditor nation to the world’s greatest debtor nation. Add the trillion dollar costs of 1) the war in Iraq and 2) the Wall St. bailout, and it’ll be many generations before the US can even hope to become dominant again.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
But on a positive note...
The Portland Trailblazers are poised to become dominant—and in the very near future. And maybe that’s what we should be focusing on at this website. We all can use a little escapism, can’t we?
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on Sep 21, 2008 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yep.
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
even a person who is going to "get lost" in the four corners area
can appreciate the Blazers!
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions
You should understand
That no country is without sin…all dvcastle is trying to say that the USA positioned itself to become a player in the world( they were forced into it)….At the end of WWII, just about every country in Europe was hoping for help from the USA and they got it….I don’t know if, politically, we were interested because we had an economic crunch at home as well…..
You need to understand that whether there was economic, political, or human reasons, the USA responded when they were needed…..without them recovery would not have happened…
Don’t forget Russia…they are the ones that abducted the spoils of war and took advantage to dominate Europe…..The neutral countries have the best position in the world, but they owe a lot to America….what has all the other so-called superpowers contributed to the world?
Sorry for your opinion of the US…..I don’t like being the world’s policeman and that policy needs to change….We helped organize the UN for this, but without the US the UN is DOA…..Many nations of the world owe a debt of gratitude to the USA….Yes the USA has fallen on hard times and it will be difficult to recover….I’m mad as hell about it, because it could have been prevented…..But even though I don’t agree I simply cannot disrespect the great Nation that it is….I don’t want to live anywhere else…..How about you and Josh Howard?
Ah, yes: the good old "love it or leave it" argument
Clearly one can’t be critical of America and patriotic at the same time. Fact is, Josh Howard and I hang out. We discuss how much we hate America.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
Hey Blenzer, if you're like amlmart1 you prefer to have your English corrected
so I hope you don’t mind. I think you’re saying “live” with a French accent making it “leave” but the correct spelling is “live”. I live in the US but some day I might leave to explore another country. :-)
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
Thank you
and yes, I like to be corrected, although this one’s a typo and am surprised if it was the only mistake.
Well, I found it a little confusing and was clarifying for myself as much
as for you. You do very well with the English language without help from me.
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
Can't.. keep.. it.. in..
They don’t like us because we have what they don’t.
They don’t like us because we have often taken what they had.
They don’t like us because we often speak of them as enemies and not equals.
They don’t like us because we often impose our interpretations of freedom on them.
They don’t like us because we often do so with violence.
Many countries enjoy many of the freedoms we do, and do so without nearly our emphasis on militarism and economic predation.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
by 12sharks on Sep 20, 2008 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Name 3
Name 3 other countries that have the same basic rights as the US, and allows it’s citizens the freedom to express their dissatisfaction with their government as freely as the US does.
That's cuz we're awesome...
I love living in God’s country, because it is the greatest and most successful human experiment in history.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 7:44 PM PDT up reply actions
Off the top of my head..
Canada, New Zealand and Switzerland.
I’m no expert on international affairs, but I have my opinions on our foreign policy and think we carry a mighty big stick and rarely speak very softly.
I’ve never traveled abroad, but if we’re simply talking the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of property happiness, I think many many countries provide such accommodations. I don’t imagine Josh Childress is suffering right now, for instance.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
I would live in any of those three
nice picks! I’ve only been to Switzerland, but I’ve heard great things of NZ and Canada is nice if you’re into the outdoors and solitude.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions
It is often said that America has the most freedoms
I don’t doubt that at one time that was true, but is that the case today?
You know, I don't like being the world's police
any more than most Americans. But there is not a world government (the UN is a joke) If one of these Countries were to be taken over by a hostile regime, who do you think would help them out? There is nothing wrong with the Countries mentioned and several others as well…But the world is hostile and ever country, including the USA has their own agenda….
The US was founded on the most liberal principles ever, and as the Country evolved, modified to keep from being totally socialist. The best Counties in the world have liberal foundations but none of them except the USA could stand alone against a hostile regime.
The USA is hated because it forces it’s will….. but it is also the first Nation to respond to a world crisis when all is not rosey….I think capitalism and being a World figure head has it’s limits and does weigh heavily on many people. But you always have to remember…Freedom isn’t free….it costs and the USA has been “all in” from the moment it was founded.
All of the free world is dependent upon the US…make no mistake about it…..We have many flaws in our government, but if the counties mentioned in this thread and others are a great place to live, then they should understand that it could be quite different without the security and example the USA has provided and founded.
So this post is trying to put a perspective on the Howard/Cuban stuff….So if you try to put their actions in context somehow, you may simply find two ungracious self serving people using or abusing their rights as Americans….with no respect for the freedoms they have….
Meh, France is pretty tough on immigrants and racial hatred is spewing.
In recent years there have been violent riots by youths mostly from Northern Africa and other former French colonies living mostly in the poor suburbs (banlieues) of the major cities, especially Paris, Marseille and a few others. Cars and busses in flames, street fights with police, etc. Something the US hasn’t seen on this scale since the LA riots. They feel not represented by politicians, disenfranchised and disadvantaged, hidden out of sight in some projects just like a lot of people living in inner-city ghettos of the US cities (yes, in Europe the distribution of rich and poor people is often the other way around). And often rightly so. A really far-right party has risen (Le Front National, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Marie_Le_Pen) and gained significant influence, and the current conservative President Sarkozy became popular as an Interior Minister playing hardball and claiming he could squash the uprising and improve the situation. He has achieved little so far.
To some extent this political situation is also true in Switzerland. Similar feelings, minus the violence. The neo-conservative/liberal Swiss People’s Party has risen to become the largest party there, regularly controlling between 20 to almost 30% of the seats in the parliament in a multi-party system and wanting to further tighten the already tough laws regarding immigration and citizenship. Can you imagine a major US politician or party advertising like this (the caption reads: Creating security)?

Don’t get me wrong, there is of course freedom of speech and press in both countries, and you can feel safer traveling there than in a lot of US areas. But since we are talking about deeply rooted feelings of people and towards people who are “different”, there is no doubt that not really hidden antipathies exist there just as well.
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paint—prairie grass, blown by wind.
didn't the french
basically kick out all immigrents?
I'm very against the immigrants politics in France
as it is too harsh and non-official immigrants can be kicked out of the country, but no, france didn’t kick out immigrants.
It also didn’t build a wall to prevent people from a neighbour country to come in…
Now, please believe I’m not saying france is a better place to live than the USA, which I don’t think, but I also could never say the USA are a better place to live in than france, I’m just putting things in perspective.
One
kicked out immigrant is already too much for me that being said, as i feel we’re all from the same earth and walking on it should be anyone’s right and I don’t see how being born one side or the other of the frontier guarentees you any ability to live in it or not…
by Blenzer on Sep 21, 2008 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
These so-called riots
had NOTHING to do with the 92 LA riots…
No dead people, very light injuries, no big deal…
I live in Paris and it was a big joke in here to see how some medias, perticularly in the USA treated the information, as if there were riots setting the country on fire, with a meteo-like french map with fires on it to symbolize where the ‘riots’ were supposed to take place (with cities TOTALLY misplaced on it, creating a scary sense of pro journalism)…
Now I’m french but not a nationalist at all, I highly dislike many of the things that happen in this country, President Sarkozy, well, I won’t say what I think about him in order not to get banned as we’re thousands of miles away from Basket-Ball and you are right about the Front National thing (although it’s been years going down in the votes and slowly disapearing, and if there is an extreme right party being an institution in here, many of the observers are surprised that no left parties are represented in american elections, as on a political scale, the democrat party is about the same as the french conservatives…)
Actually the problems with youngsters from french subburbs happenned because of police brutality, which is a real concern in France, and there are more and more cops in here.
when are the "youths" going to riot again?
makes Paris look like Karachi.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions
You'll have to ask medias such as
Fox News which seems good at making something look like somthing it is not…
by Blenzer on Sep 21, 2008 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yep a thousand times!
"Aneurysm".
When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie
I don't watch that Rupert Murdoch "rubbish" (to borrow a term from your British friends that saved your day back in '44)
I watched the “youths” rioting on CNN and MSNBC (even Keith Olberman… former SportsCenter guy turned anti-Bill O’Reilly dude).
I actually thought it was nice to see people standing up for themselves politically. I mean, I never condone violence, but peaceful protest is refreshing.
The disadvantadged people in America just take their Oregon Trail cards and buy Lays potato chips and Pepsis (sometimes Diet, sometimes regular). Not exactly an economic use of welfare money to buy such unnutritious food.
But, I like that immigrants in France actually do something proactive about their grievences and don’t just eat fatty foods and sugary carbonated waters.
I have a high level of respect for French people. Americans know how to work, and that’s about it. French people know how to live. You have excellent wine and 35 hour work weeks. You actually spend time eating meals and conversing with friends and family. I actually think all that stuff is very cool and makes sense as far as raising your standard of living (in the sense of how happy you are).
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions
The youths
you mention are for the vast majority french, some black, some of arabic, portuguese, asian or polish descent, but they are french, were born in France.
What they have in common is that they leave in subburdean ghettoes.
Appart from that, you fine very bad wine as well in france, some californian ones are excellent, thanks to our dear president the 35 hour week is dying and most french have about an hour to eat… The only thing good in here is that you don’t pay for medecine, hospital, school or university and there is 5 weeks of holidays for everybody who is worlking, and the people who don’t have jobs get 400E from the government to survive.
The country you are describing in terms of standard of living would more be Spain or Portugal.
Ah yes...
I forgot about the siestas and discotheques that open at 2 am (and close at sunrise)…
So maybe Spain nailed it. And they have lots of good sangria too.
But are people, overall, happier in France than in the US?
My hunch is yes, they are happier, with all those benefits (albiet less freedoms). Higher taxes means necessarily less freedom. But it doesn’t necessarily mean less happiness. Americans are fixated on freedom, while French people are fixated on wine/cigarettes and happiness.
That gets me thinking, how hard is it for an American to move there? After I finish school, do you think I can get a job there even though I barely know how to say “S’il te plait” ???
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions
Of course you can
get a job here, but you better be warned, french people are rude and by far less friendly than the americans.
I don’t know if people are happier here or there, but I tend to think it depends at least partially on your financial situation…
And… we’ll have to agree to disagree on the ‘more taxes = less freedom’ thing as it is those taxes that provide free schools and hospitals to everybody, french or not, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie receive 2000E per month from french allocations by the way since they live in France (they surely need it). I tend to think it’s hard to feel free if you can’t heal, cure or educate yourself freely.
Wow, i sound like i’m defending the french system, my friends would be very surprised if they read me.
I'm guessing you are considered a "moderate" in France
and because everything is more Socialist, it sounds like you’re defending the system. Is that what you mean by your friends would be surprised?
That thing about Brangelina is a farce. Nobody with that money should receive any stipend from the gov. (I guess that is my cowboy capatilist attitude showing through).
That’s an interesting way to look at it though. I think we are more “free” because we pay less taxes. But you think we are less “free” because our ability to get health care/etc. is based on whether or not we have money. Therefore, poor people here are not “free” to get care, but they are in France. Interesting concept. (To be fair, we have de facto free health care in that anybody who shows up to an emergency room at a hospital will get care no matter what… but they can’t get care in preventative/non-emergency situations, so it’s pretty limited).
So I guess you’re telling me I should just make money here and then I will be happier, since my economic situation is good.
There is something I really like about the US, the abundent wilderness and nature. I like to go out in expansive wild places where there are no people and hang out. Not sure if that is possible as much in France. But maybe I should focus on making money and just stay here. But then it gets back to the quality of life issue: What is the cost to my quality by trying to make a lot of money here? Could I move to France and wing it as far as effort toward my job and live happier than trying to get rich here?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions
My friends would
be surprised because I’m very critical toward french system, and i was sounding like i was defending it…
How does a French person like yourself
get entangled in this Blazers Edge blog?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Because
the blazers are one of my biggest passions in life and I find this site to so so great, interesting bloggers, friendly, it is my favorite site overall…
I don’t post very oftenly but i spend a lot of time in here
What turned you on to the Blazers?
(sorry for the personal questions… i just find it fascinating somewhat)
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Clyde Drexler
and the fact that at the time they seemed like the only ones who could stop the Bulls (though in retrospective that was a long shot…).
BTW, I’ve oftenly wondered if for Portlanders it doesn’t seem very ridiculous and pathetic to be a Blazers diehard fan without even having put a foot in the city just once…
No, it's somewhat unique, but also somewhat normal
I think American kids sometimes get hard-up passions for European “football” clubs without ever having been to Europe.
But Portland definitely doesn’t seem like the type of international team like Real Madrid or Manchester United. So it is sort of wierd that you like the Blazers that much.
I’m glad you know english, cause most Portland fans not named Paul Allen don’t know a lick of French. I’ve been to France a few times, but really only know how to say s’il te plait and like to use it instead of s’il vous plait because I think it’s funny to talk to elders like that (a bit childish i guess).
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions
English
is an international language, much more than french, I understand a lot of native tongue don’t feel the need to speak another language…
PA speaks french or I didn’t understand correctly ?
yes, supposedly he speaks some french
since his gigantic yacht is parked near Monaco a lot.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions
do you think my s'il te plait versus s'il vous plait
usage is funny?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions
Well...
humour is a personnal thing, something that’s funny for someone could not be for someone else…
To answer your question, the ’s’il-te-plait ?’ thing doesn’t turn me hilarious, it’s basically the same as forgetting to say ‘Sir’ to an old man…
dang
I guess I won’t try to do any French stand-up comedy any time soon.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions
Good for you
french stand-up humourists are very fashionable in here lately,, but they really are NOT FUNNY AT ALL…
They’re nowhere near the level of american ones…
What's your favorite place to visit in the entire country?
(The Lourvre, Chartres Cathedral, The Bayeux Tapestry, eastern Provence, and etc… any place, town, thing)
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't know
I like Paris in general and the rest of the country is a bit boring…
but paris is too expensive and the weather is BAD
Do you feel lucky to have so much
“culture” in France. Or do you even think of it that way?
I mean, I see France as having a rich history and culture, and the few chances I have to be there, I want to soak up as much as possible.
But since you were born with it all around you, do you sort not really care about it that much?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions
I actually think
the american culture to be more interesting and no, I don’t feel perticularly lucky toward that fact
really?
what part? Hollywood? music? guns? God? apple pie?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions
So, getting back to the topic,
do you think people have gotten too excited about what Josh Howard said?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes and no
I tend to think there is something racist in his approach of the antem. I would have respected if he had only said that he wasn’t going to celebrate it, that’s his right, but the connection with him being black is not obvious to me.
I can easily understand someone not feeling patriotic enough to celebrate an national antem, to link it to a certain colour of skin implies a racist way of thinking in my opinion.
Dang, that's no fun...
By the way, I have experience the rudeness of Parisans a few times… got mugged once near the opera/moulin rouge area.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Sorry, didn't want to make it look more dramatic
Just give an example that there are also problems between social classes and people with different ethnic origins in Europe (like you said, e.g. the police making use of “racial profiling” common in the US which was also critiqued by a few posters here). I have never lived in France for extended periods, but have friends e.g. in St. Denis and Argenteuille, and they were pretty concerned about the clashes. Not that they were in physical danger, but just the fact of this happening was unsettling. And yeah, they too are in no way supporters of Le Pen or Sarkozy.
And just like in the US, immigration is a hotly debated topic in a lot of European countries for many vastly different reasons (labor, national security, etc.) requiring a change of mind in many ways. Especially the countries at the outer “edges” of the European Union (south, east), where naturally a lot of illegal immigrants are first detected, often feel left alone with the problem by the other states.
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paint—prairie grass, blown by wind.
my point
was to say the situation was about the same, no better, not worse, with specificities in both countries of course, I just disagreed with the ‘better, worse, best’ type of approach.
A lot of sad and shocking things happen in this world, from a politician vomiting his inept prose against immigrants to a cross burning on grass, it surely doesn’t make a country better or worse…
Then we shouldn’t be manichean, one of Le Pen’s biggest supporters is a half black humorist, in Holland, their extreme right party’s leader was gay, killed and now his successor is black…
Reality is not simplistic, we shouldn’t categorize things one way or the other…
Part of Paris
… was on fire due to Islamic immigrants for 2 weeks with the authorities paralyzed by fear to do anything about it. Imagine that happening to part of Portland and you can see the difference.
Paris can be proud no authority was willing to step in and make the place safe. I guess you can call that “civilized”.
In August 2003 temperatures in Europe crested slightly more than 100 degrees. Their socialist systems allowed over 49,000 elderly throughout Europe to perish, over half of them in France.
Can you imagine how we would respond if even 100 of our elderly in Oregon died because of such a palty “heat wave”?
Europhiles can pretend other nations are anywhere near who we are, they are wrong.
I don't wish
to be defending the french or european system, as i think it has so many flaws, but to say that part of Paris was ‘was on fire due to Islamic immigrants for 2 weeks with the authorities paralyzed by fear to do anything about it’ simply IS NOT TRUE…
Actually, most of these violences were counter reactions to over severe police actions. Appart from that a lot of the rebelling youngsters rebelling were NOT muslims neither.
Old people dying because they’re not used to high temperature is a sad thing which surely could have been handled in a better way (but may be more telling of how impersonal our occidental societies are, everyone by themselves in their appartments, going from that observation, I don’t know what could have been done) and I’m close to sure no such things could happen the USA.
Just like I’m sure no huricane could destroy part of a big city in Louisiana and then have military forces be given order to shoot at sight on buglars and be sure everybody, especially poors will be saved no mattter what the cost.
PLLLLLLLLLEASE, I’m not a europhile, for the last time, and don’t wish to prove any system is better than the other, I just wish to explain it’s very dangerous to believe where you live is so much better than EVERYWHERE else, and simply untrue.
We could have talked about death penalty in Texas for instance, political prisonners such as Leonard Peltier, Geronimo Pratt or Mumia Abu Jamal, lapidary trials for people who don’t have enough money to pay a real lawyer, universities that are not free, cities built around jail organisation, KKK or whatever, but my point is NOT to say I don’t like the USA, which is NOT the case, nor it is to say that Europe or France is great, which I definitely do NOT think and could have backed up that with so many points proving France is not great, far more telling and accurate than the so-called riots or the heatwave.
To tell you the truth I think both systems look a lot the same, and more and more by the way, and even if it’s still better to live in those societies than in China, North Korea or Russia just to name a few, I don’t see any reason to be proud of countries such as the USA or France that create so many inequalities, allow people to live in the streets while others near have so much money they don’t even know what to do with it.
To end, I even don’t see how you can be proud of something you haven’t done or chosed.
Even so. Look at the...
…list of countries by life expectancy.
The Midnight Rambler. Born to make mistakes.
Interesting
Poverty would seem to have something to do with it.
by southern oregon on Sep 21, 2008 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Indeed it is
and it’s also a natural disaster…
Do you think Indonesia for instance is a bad country because the tsunami killed more than 200 000 people ?
On a side note, 30 000 people die every year due to guns, which has nothing to do with nature.
Again, again, again, please, no europe is better than this or that, USA is bad blah blah blah
Good point, we don't need to debate who
takes better care of people… nobody’s perfect (but it was nice to see that the organization that was the most perfect in dealing with the Tsunami was the US Navy… but I digress).
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions
Europe?
The most conservative thing in Europe is to left of even our Democrats (except for the anti-Semitic Le Pen). You are just bating the conversation to imply anything like the American governmental structure was in charge during late summer 2003 anywhere in Europe.
Portland is my town, born here as well.
Oh yeah,
you’re the cell tower broadband guy, right?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions
I do agree that people dieing like that makes our response to Hurricane Katrina look a lot better
but I don’t know the details of the heat wave too much.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions
It was pretty bad for Western and Central Europe
Maybe it would not have been so to people living in Arizona or some parts of Spain. But just like all catastrophes, speed and scope of the reaction to it is a matter of preparedness.
Countries that don’t usually experience some extreme condition such as heat have problems dealing with it. Countries that have little experience with flooding have problems dealing with that. I’m pretty sure France would not be prepared for a major earthquake like Japan or California, Germany not for a volcano like Italy or Indonesia since the last eruption was thousands of years ago, Greece not for blizzards like Finland and the Midwest, and the Pacific coast not for a tsunami or something else.
Claiming that the political system has much to do with it is a point I don’t really understand. And claiming most of Europe is “socialist” is a thing of the past. To my knowledge (and I travel extensively), even most countries in Eastern Europe maybe apart from Belorussia, which isn’t a part of the EU and won’t be for quite some time, have come a very long way towards a much more democratic, capitalistic, pro-western and to that end pro-American society. Just look at which countries in Europe were most eager to support the US in the last war: Georgia, Poland, …
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paint—prairie grass, blown by wind.
does Belarus tranlate to "White Russia" ??
just curious.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes
In some languages the literal “White Russia” is even used, though Belarus now is of course the official name (or traditional Belorussija).
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paint—prairie grass, blown by wind.
that's what i think
which reminds me… i haven’t had a white russian in a few years, and i really like the taste and texture of them..
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 22, 2008 2:35 AM PDT up reply actions
No
But I wish I was. I guess being a sports agent would be fun, though you need a lot of good contacts to begin with and while I would enjoy the scouting I’m not too much into legalese. My firm would need a great lawyer and accountant to begin with, cause that’s not my strength ;-)
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paint—prairie grass, blown by wind.
we might be onto something here...
hmm…
do you have any contacts? what’s your email address?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 22, 2008 2:34 AM PDT up reply actions
For the record
In Europe reaching temperatures 85 is considered burning hot. And our own track record with disasters aint so good. America is only SLIGHTY if any better than many European countries.
"Why would we lie to ourselves dude?"
"Be excellent to each other."
"All we are is dust in the wind, dude."
"Strange things are afoot at the Circle K."
The Wisdom of Bill S Preston Esquire and Ted Theodore Logan
by GreatOden'sRaven on Sep 22, 2008 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions
Thanks for the explanation of Europe's climate...
and, of course we’re better at dealing with these things.
The US military and FEMA is probably the most capable disaster response agencies in the world.
They screwed up Katrina because the top officials didn’t take it seriously enough. But even during Katrina we only had several dozens of deaths, not several thousand like the Euros killed during the heat wave.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 22, 2008 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe..
it was 100 degrees Celsius – that would be pretty hot.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
e pluribus unum = "from many, one" ... that's the motto on our national seal
America has an unmatched history of accepting immigrants.
Ever heard of Ellis Island?
The “immigration debate” in the US is about the roughly 10 million people who snuck in illegally. If you come here legally, we always are more accepting than France and other places.
Part of America’s strength comes from the fact that we have always accepted wave after wave of (legal) immigrants to come to our country, lay down roots and invogorate our culture and economy.
We are the “melting pot.”
I would argue that our approach toward immigration is “better.”
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions
You live
in the USA so you know better than I do, but the common word in here is that it’s hard to get the green card, that you have to prove the job you do no american can exercise…
very true
but the most persistant people find a way to make it. My roommate came from Thailand six years ago and somebody I used to work with came from Kenya in 2001.
But you’re right, it’s not like you just have to show up at the border and you can automatically enter.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions
then
I would hardly say the approach toward immigration is good, just like building a wall to prevent some mexicans to come is the collest approach toward immigration.
I guess the libertarians would argue for totally open
borders. But that’s not practical at this point.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions
All countries in the European Union have signed...
… the European Convention on Human Rights. There´s also a Court to monitor compliance by Signatory Parties.
All those countries have similar freedom and rights you have in USA.
The Midnight Rambler. Born to make mistakes.
The only difference I know is about the weapons´ posesion.
The Midnight Rambler. Born to make mistakes.
yes they did
but human rights, and all the freedoms we enjoy in america are very different. You are right about their gun laws, they have more sexual freedoms that we do in America, but they are much harder on immagration as Norsktroll posted above.
One other thing, I think we should all remember, is most of these countries policy’s, amendments to their consitutions, etc… are pretty new. Canada’s happened in the 80’s, the Euorpean Convention on human rights was after WW2, etc… I have to believe at least in some part that they were influnced by the US bill of rights.
As a strict constructionist regarding legal theory, ...
I totally agree with you about fully adhering to the United States Constitution.
It’s like when someone is sworn into the office of the U.S. Presidency and, for whatever reason, they place their right hand upon the Bible rather than a copy of the Bill of Rights. In my opinion, that act violates the Establishment Clause within the First Amendment.
Okay, that’s enough political blathering from me—-especially since this is a basketball blog.
Thanks Scalia
How about the fact that the Constitution was written by people with slaves?
Do you really think they “nailed it” or do you think there are flaws and things to interpret differently two hundred plus years later?
(PS. Nice dissent in Lawrence v. Texas!)
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonin Scalia ...
is of the formalist theory of constitutional law, which is nothing more than ultraconservative judicial activism that’s hidden under a façade of originalist/textualist philosophy. As far as I’m cocerned, Scalia and fellow Associate Justice Clarence Thomas are federalist scumbags who’ve sold out to the executive branch.
Anyhow, with regards to every judge who’s sat on the U.S. Supreme Court throughout American history, absolutist/literalist Hugo Black (1937-1971) is my all-time favorite. Black was the one who claimed the following: “The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment means […] Neither a state nor the federal government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another. Neither can force nor influence a person to go to or to remain away from church against his will or force him to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion.”
Anyhow, my view regarding the U.S. Supreme Court is that it’s there solely to uphold or knock down a law at the federal, state, and municipal levels depending on its constitutionality — which obviously includes slavery, as it goes against the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment — rather than be misused by judges in a self-serving manner. For example, the U.S. Supreme Court made the correct decision in the case of Gonzales v. Oregon, whereby the Oregon Death with Dignity Act was upheld despite reactionary opposition.
So when I get Oregon to pass a statute
that allows for doctors to prescribe life ending drugs to Blazer fans when we don’t make the playoffs, it will be upheld, right?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions
It will if I have my way.
That’s how much I can’t stand to see the Blazers lose.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 21, 2008 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions
who said
we were “blindly Praise”ing anything? The anthem means a great deal to the mass majority of Americans, the same can be said for our nations flag, as proven by how upset people get when they are not treated with respect.
Personally I find those who don’t repect the sacrifices of our past are just ignorat of what it took to give them their present. American has many problems, past and present, but that doesn’t change the fact that it is still the greatest place to live on earth. No other country gives its citizens the freedoms and rights we have.
"blindly praise" means the "love it or leave it" crowd
And of course the crowd that allows occasionally reprehensible foreign policy to be spun as “If you love this country, then you’ll support…”.
This country DOES allow the most freedom and rights, but this does not mean we are infallible or perfect. It is only through questioning our leaders and their decisions, with no fear of being painted as “unpatriotic”, that we continue to grow as a country.
As soon as rampant nationalism takes over, expect a rise in racism, intolerance, and hate. Ask an American with middle-east roots how they were treated after 9-11. Heck, ask a Malaysian or Eastern Indian how they were treated, even though their countries are thousands of miles from the Middle East.
"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ." -Gandhi
"Throw Thag, throw. Throw throw throw throw throw throw"- Far Side
by TheThinWhiteDuke on Sep 20, 2008 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
The problem I have with what Howard said
is that he didn’t do what you suggested. He wasn’t questioning our current leadership about anything, he was simply refusing to respect our national anthem because (I am speculating here) of the injustices that were done to his ancestors. He has the freedom to express that opinion, I just really disagree with him. I don’t think we are in a state of “rampant Nationalism”, but having a healthly respect for what your country has proved you doesn’t seem too much to ask.
Let's just say that Howard's ancestors weren't dancing in the streets on July 4, 1776
So this country means something different to him than it does to me.
I want to ask him why he said what he said. I don’t want to accuse him or anything, or necessarily say something bad about his comments.
I seek first to understand.
What is the reason? What needs to be done to make him feel better? Why was his neighborhood and schools growing up so much worse than mine?
That being said, that guy is making $10 million a year and probably flies around vacationing and smoking dope and playing a game for a living, while most people in America are hurting to fill up there tank and pay their mortgage. My problem with Howard are not his comments, but the way he treats other people who are less fortunate. He’s one of the luckiest people in the world and doesn’t care about others.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 7:56 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't know Howard
But I’m pretty sure his lack of jump-up-and-down patriotism has to do with more than what was “done to his ancestors.” Do you have any black friends? If so, then I’m sure they can share their personal experiences with racism and descrimination. Just ask them.
For instance, EVERY black person—no matter how successful or well-educated—has experienced being stopped by the police for “driving while Black” (DWB). I used to live in East Oakland, CA, and when my black friends drove across the city limits into San Leandro, they could COUNT on being stopped. It was unofficial police policy.
Now when a white person gets stopped by the police, it’s annoying or inconvenient. When Blacks get stopped—often on a mere pretext—they have every reason to sweat bullets. Of course, 99 times in 100, the fear proves groundless. At worst the policeman writes a bogus ticket. But YOU try facing those 1 in 100 odds—feeling your heart pounding and wondering if you’re going to get hassled, arrested, or even get your ass kicked—and see how you feel about it. It might even shake your patriotism just a hair.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
no it won't.
Dirty cops are horrible and should be punished. Dirty police commisioners who let such “unwritten policies” be enforced should be punishied, but it has nothing to do with what this country stands for. No one is perfect, no country is, racisim will always be around in some for or another, but blaming a country for what some racisit cop did is crazy. But you are right about one thing, I don’t know what it is like, I am a white male, so to some extent I have been given a very good life by this country without many of the injustices a black man would face. But at some point, we all need to take responsibility for our own actions and live our lives.
No question, and I'm not defending Howard's attitude
I’m just saying you need to put it in perspective. It’s easy to be patriotic when you or your family members haven’t been on the wrong end of a policeman’s baton. Not everyone is going to be up to that—to loving what this country “stands for” even when the reality of what it IS is so often diametrically opposed to that ideal.
As I’ve said elsewere in this thread, what’s remarkable is that so many American Blacks ARE patriotic. Look at how many have given their lives to fight for the same country that has discriminated against them. One of my Dad’s best friends was a Tuskegee Airman during WWII. If you saw the Denzel Washington movie, you have some sense of what those guys had to deal with. Yet none of it was enought to stop them from being war heroes.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
It was very ignorant of him to say
Just like it’s ignorant to tell him to leave the country.
Both of you have the right to say your piece………two differing opinions, living in harmony.
Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game
by iDea on Sep 20, 2008 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Forget Josh Howard
What’s remarkable isn’t that some American Blacks don’t get all rah rah in their patriotism. What’s notable is how many of them are patriotic despite what’s been done to their race over the centuries in this country. I don’t begrudge any Black person who says, “Take your national anthem and shove it.” But I’m moved when I think of all the Black soldiers who have given their lives for this racist country despite the way they’ve been treated here.
It’s easy for the race that’s been the beneficiary of American freedom from Day 1 to love this country. Listen to Ray Charles or Billy Preston sing, “America the Beautiful”: THAT’S patriotism!
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on Sep 20, 2008 9:52 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
opinion of a foreigner
1) Josh Howard is an idiot.
2) Mark Cuban is smart but I think he did wrong in putting all the e-mails together. Some of the e-mails were not racist and should not be lumped together with the other racist crap.
3) If I were a american and a Dallas fan. I’d be more bothered about this Howard statement than the one he said about smoking marijuana ( I didn’t agree with that one either). But maybe thats’s because I don’t have kids yet, I don’t have to worry if my kid will look up to some basketball player as a role model ( I hope they won’t).
I'm wondering how many of you saw the actual video of Josh Howard?
He said it so flippantly and was clearly putting on a show for the camera. Maybe he really believes what he said? I don’t know. Which really is besides the point. He should know better saying something that controversial into a camera phone.
The 2 people who should be the most pissed off about the Howard video are:
1. Barack Obama…just because Howard puts himself front and center as an Obama supporter after saying those comments. Not exactly the kind of endorsement Obama is looking for.
2. Mark Cuban…many Texas folks take their national anthem and American flags seriously. Those comments are not going to go over well most places…especially Dallas.
What is Patriotism?
I know it’s love of country. But how does one express that? And what is the greater expression of that love?
Is it crying during the national anthem and wearing flag pins?
Is it getting involved in your community to make it better?
Is it serving in the military?
Is it being a teacher, firefighter, police officer, or nurse?
I guess the list could go on and on. I’m just wondering what makes a person Partriotic? And who is the top Patriot? Is there a degree of Patriotism?
Brady used to be the top Patriot...
I guess you could aruge Belly-chick, or whoever that hooded dude is.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions
"Getting out of jury duty is easy. The trick is to say you're prejudiced against all races." - Homer Simpson
Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision
Amen to your sig line Tom. I couldn't agree more.
I realize you are half joking and so am I, but there is quite a bit of truth in that joke, which I suppose is what makes it so effective..
The Dude abides
Thanks
I got it from that Spanish guy, Bi-Mart, or something like that.
Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision
The first ever 15-title dynasty
should sound a bit of an alarm.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 7:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Why must you keep bringing-up race?
This thread was winding down to its last 500 or so comments until you dropped by and jump-started it again. And after I’ve taken to heart your constant pleas not to talk politics, race, or religion.
There used to be a blog called Blazers Edge
You could go there anytime day or night and talk Portland Trail Blazers
Then one day all Blazer fans on Blazers Edge realized
That they are political junkies
And they’ve been sticking the needle in each other ever since.
"Screw the chalupa – it’s the victory I want." --timg56
Exactly...
Why post a comment race baiting everyone on here. It speaks to the diversity of BE membership that you hear a nice array of viewpoint. Quoting Homer Simpson is either funny or race baiting, but probably not both.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions
Excellent idea, thanks tweener!
"Screw the chalupa – it’s the victory I want." --timg56
by MiledAnimal on Sep 21, 2008 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions
I love you man
even if you’re not really Hawaiian.
"Screw the chalupa – it’s the victory I want." --timg56
by MiledAnimal on Sep 21, 2008 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions
WHO CARES?
Don’t we already know that a lot of pro athletes are bad people and pro sports may or may not be good for society.
Why do we have to argue about what some dude said. Does he matter that much, if at all?
I think it's silly to quivel about what Josh Howard did or didn't say...
I think it’s awesome that the Blazers are such a stand up team, all high character guys and such.
But I don’t see the point of bashing some other guy for saying something he probably didn’t think much about before saying. I’m just saying, unless I know him, why should I judge? (I don’t know what neighborhood he grew up in, what school he attended, what hardships he face).
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 20, 2008 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions
I sit in row C behind the visitors bench
I plan on exercising my freedom of speech when Dallas shows up
Something devastatingly clever
Like “booooo”.
Or I could scream “Excuse me Mr. Howard, I fail to concur with your assessment of our national anthem.”
I’m open for suggestions.
When Howard is introduced
everyone should break-out their Bic lighters and American flags. Then we should all light a blunt and blow the smoke his way.
"Screw the chalupa – it’s the victory I want." --timg56
by MiledAnimal on Sep 21, 2008 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions
I love that we get 200 comments on this issue
And Mavs Moneyball gets like – 3?
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paint—prairie grass, blown by wind.
In a sense, but maybe we all need to get a life...?
I wonder about that a lot, in-between comments.
"Screw the chalupa – it’s the victory I want." --timg56
by MiledAnimal on Sep 21, 2008 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions
I can't. I've tried. I'm addicted to coffee and BE.
"Screw the chalupa – it’s the victory I want." --timg56
by MiledAnimal on Sep 21, 2008 11:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Add cigs and you have me
"I figured out how to get the canoe down the mountain, but I will need a snow blower and all your butter"-Michael Kelso
by 92wastheyear on Sep 21, 2008 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions
well it is raining outside(at my house)
and I don’t like housework or TV that much..I took a shower this morning, but I haven’t eaten lunch yet…so I’ll probably come back after lunch
by 67 on Sep 21, 2008 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions
nearly 300 comments... and ONLY 1 REC !!!
Does that prove that Josh Howards comments have been overblown by the media?
Well
Since no one wants to discuss the topic at hand. I will.
I agree with Cuban’s stance to publish the emails and their addresses. Its funny how people hide behind the internet as a way to truly push their agendas yet would almost never be caught in public espousing such views. Such is the greatness (ability to remain anonymous) and sadness (youtube comments) that is the internet. In my opinion if you have the balls to write an email to a public figure and say the things that were said on that blog, then you should stand up and defend your stance to the public.
I dont necessarily condone what Josh Howard did, (to be honest, I don’t care) but I think his sentiment is one that is shared by quite a few people. It just happens to be that he is famous and rich. Howard seems to be in the camp that feels that the USA is an unjust place for black people (which has quite a bit of facts to back up that assertion) and he feels the need to show his displeasure with the state of affairs. I see no issue with that. Not standing for the anthem is a peaceful protest (although Josh’s seemed somewhat tinged with ignorance as opposed to revolutionary peace) and is fully protected under the Constitution. His lack of defiance (and his “and um Obama 08 or whatever” comment) lead me to believe more than anything he was just slacking off during the ceremony and joking around. If you watch the video you will notice MANY people not paying attention, both in the stands and on the field. To characterize Josh Howard as a moron may well fit, but unpatriotic is nonsense. Its his right.
The emails that Cuban received basically helped justify how Howard felt (which I assume is what Cuban wanted) yet I HOPE were just a small sampling and many were less hate and vitriol filled.
I find it sad that the “If you don’t like it leave” people continually cry and moan that people dont respect our country. They don’t realize that the people who don’t like it are the best allies they have. If you blindly follow patriotism you miss out on seeing other viewpoints. Not that Howards will be one to spark anything but those anti-stance people help shape America and make it great.
Group Think = Patriotism (sadly) and without check, will cause nothing but death and destruction.
"Why would we lie to ourselves dude?"
"Be excellent to each other."
"All we are is dust in the wind, dude."
"Strange things are afoot at the Circle K."
The Wisdom of Bill S Preston Esquire and Ted Theodore Logan
by GreatOden'sRaven on Sep 22, 2008 3:37 PM PDT reply actions
This would be green..
if people still cared about this post or endured the five minutes it takes to scroll all the way down here. Nice job.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
OVER 300 COMMENTS and ONLY 1 REC !!!
There’s a lot of hot air in here… but
doesn’t the fact that only 1 person has REC’d the post prove that Howard’s comments are irrelevant?
If they actually meant anything, they people would REC this post.
But they don’t. Who cares?
Nothing but hot air in here.
People can’t even stay on topic because the topic proves itself irrelevant.
By the way...
…here’s something I don’t believe has even been touched on in the over 300 comments in this thread. That is: do we actually know that Dwight Howard isn’t patriotic? I’m referring to REAL patriotism, not the symbolic, flag-waving kind. What people say is just lip service. What counts is what they actually do when they’re under the gun. In this case, I mean that literally. I didn’t serve in the military, but in evaluating someone’s character, I often ask myself, “If this guy and I were in combat together, could I count on him? Would he put his life on the line to help me if I got shot?”
I don’t know what Howard would do in that situation. But based on the little I’ve seen, I wouldn’t be too quick to assume he’d fail that ultimate test of character and patriotism. From what I’ve observed, Howard is a good teammate. He plays hard and plays unselfishly. He doesn’t appear to be the typical stat-and-endorsement-obsessed NBA athlete. Yes, he smokes weed, and he doesn’t get choked up when he hears the national anthem for the zillionth time. But we only know those things because the guy is honest to a fault.
From what I’ve heard, those are exactly the types of guys who often end up being heroes when the situation calls for it. By contrast, many of the people who are loudly and even obscenely condemning this guy—who they don’t even know personally—would be cowering in their foxholes. Afterwards, of course, they’d line up for undeserved medals.
As the expression goes, “Be careful of the stones you throw.” Patriotism isn’t about wrapping yourself in the flag or singing the national anthem at basketball games.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
I agree, just because Dwight Howard was on the Redeem Team doesn't mean he is patriotic...
and just because Josh Howard says he isn’t, doesn’t mean he really isn’t.
It’s deep down inside what counts… or, as I believe, doesn’t matter.
Can’t you lead an honorable and ethical life and be a great steward of your community and the world AND not be patriotic?
Since when does being patriotic make somebody a better person overall?
What if I’m patriotic, but a selfish bad person?
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 22, 2008 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions
PS. maybe you accidently said Dwight instead of Josh Howard, but that's chill, I'll run with it if need be
maybe you should slowdown08 in your typing though.
just kidding.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 22, 2008 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Oops. Now I've gotten DWIGHT Howard in trouble!
Here comes the hate mail.
But seriously: often even the person himself doesn’t know what’s deep in his or her own heart. For instance, a guy who thinks he’d run at the first sound of gunfire can end up being the hero. Conversely, the supposed biggest patriot around can end up running for cover when the chips are down. So how foolish and arrogant to presume to know what someone is really about based on some off the wall comments they make to someone’s cell phone.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
The real fool
is the person that made the comment, don’t you think?…this has nothing to do with patriotism, it is just plain lack of respect (towards your fellow man)and then tossing in I’m black for an excuse. These things get blown out of proportion, for sure, but when you decide to be a jerk and your a public figure, this is what can be expected. Tons of opinions on what was Howard trying to say? It doesn’t make me angry, but it does (further) lower my opinion of this person as an individual.
"These things get blown our of proportion for sure"
You make my point. And the fact that one is a good enough basketball player to become “a public person” doesn’t mean they signed on for this kind of scrutiny. Howard was certainly foolish to say what he said, but no more so than all the self-righteous people who crucified him for it. And Howard’s “crime” doesn’t compare to that of the bigots who used the N-word to condemn him. BTW, that was the question posed in the original post: “who was the bigger villain.”
All the bigots did was make clear why some Blacks feel as Howard apparently does. Emphasis on the word “apparently,” because for all we know when push comes to shove Howard is as patriotic as the next person.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
My comment was intended as a reply to 67
…if anyone is still paying attention to this over-heated fanpost.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
I'm paying attention...
but the over-heating is burning my mind (and they say LSD is bad… huh)
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 23, 2008 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions

by 





















