Portland's Seeding Possibilities
With a new dawn breaking for the Portland Trail Blazers, seeing Greg Oden’s sunny face peeking over the horizon, one of the hot questions of the moment is, “What kind of playoff seed could the Blazers earn this year, providing they even make it?”
I will pre-warn you, the only fair way I can see to discuss these things is to try my best to take off the “fan” hat and look at the Blazers as I would any other team. If these same players were wearing Clippers uniforms what would we think? That’s what we should think when they’re wearing ours too. I understand that this is not 100% possible, since I am a devoted fan, so I tend to take my best, most unbiased guess and then shave even a little more off it to compensate. It certainly would be possible, maybe more uplifting, to take a rosier view, but at some point that becomes an exercise in auto-eroticism and thus terribly uninteresting to anyone but the author and folks who already think like him. I’m not into that…at least not in public.
People on the other end of the spectrum will no doubt chime in with, “How can you begin to speculate about the playoffs when the team hasn’t been there in five years, is celebrating the arrival of three key rookies, and hasn’t played a game yet this season?” To them I say, “Look in the sky. If you see clouds, there’s a decent chance it could rain. You can say it hasn’t yet, but I’m bringing my umbrella just in case.” You could point to the growth of the team in recent years, Brandon Roy’s All-Star season, Lamarcus Aldridge’s continuing development, Greg Oden’s long shadow, the 41-41 record…the list goes on. But one the most indicative signs is simply that you’re reading this. One cardinal rule has held true throughout Blazer history: you never hear about the Blazers until they’re good. When did the nation first become aware of Clyde Drexler and company, who turned out to be one of the best teams of their era? Not until they hit the ’89-’90 Finals. When did you first start paying attention to Rasheed Wallace? Not until the Blazers got to the Western Conference Finals against
On to the question at hand: How high can the Blazers rise in the seeding?
Anyone who doesn’t have a screw loose would have to say that the L*kers, Hornets, and Spurs are among the top favorites in the West. I know people are speculating about the Spurs’ age and health and we’ll get to that when we do the individual team previews. For now let’s remember that people have been speculating about the Spurs’ decline for years. They still win a ring in every odd-numbered season. Their “decline” may mean that’s not as likely this year, but the idea that it would take them out of a top four seed in the West seems unfounded. There’s no reasonable way to predict the Blazers would finish ahead of any of these three teams.
The next echelon, which may actually meld with the top, consists of very good teams (or at least potentially very good) who still have to prove that they’re among the elite. The Rockets and Jazz fit neatly into this category.
At this point we find the former-contenders who could be slipping:
This is where the Blazers can examine legitimate possibilities. There are a couple of “ifs” here. The most obvious is, “IF the Blazers are very good.” Very good is a relative term, compared to how the team has played. The gap between 41 wins and 50 has traditionally been wider than 9 games. 41 wins is the hallmark of mediocrity. 50 wins has long been the barometer for good teams. There’s a possibility if the players remain healthy and the team comes together extremely quickly that the Blazers could get into the upper 40’s, maybe even the low 50’s at the most hopeful edge, putting them within shouting distance of these two traditional powerhouses. That brings up the second “if”: “IF those other teams struggle.” There’s good reason to think that both
It seems reasonable to speculate that one of these teams could fall. It’s possible to speculate that the Blazers could ascend to their height. Both happening at the same time is less likely. Speculating that both teams will fall while the Blazers also rise to the 50-win mark probably goes too far. If that did happen, it would be dancing in the streets time, but we’re trying to keep it real here. This, then, defines the upper limit of what the Blazers could reasonably (as opposed to wishfully) hope for: one of those teams slips and the Blazers play very well, leaving
The last teams to be considered are those with decent track records who either slipped last season or are in flux because of off-season occurrences. Right now this group includes
Using the same common sense we applied to
The one saving grace in the West is that none of the teams who finished behind
With the four teams finishing in the 6th-9th positions in the West last year in flux it probably won’t take 50 wins to make the playoffs again. It’s certainly possible that 50 wins will only get you the 7th seed, however. Even 47-48 wins may mean a fight in the last weeks of the season to grab a spot. Given those parameters a finish between 7th-9th in the West is a reasonable range for the Blazers with 7th or 8th being the clear targets and 9th being a disappointment. Any finish higher than that should be viewed as spectacular. Any finish lower would be quite poor.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
1 recs |
86 comments
Comments
1st
There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man β with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)
My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.
Season Tix: Section 315, with my sons
by johnv59 on
Sep 18, 2008 11:32 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
No, I'm pretty sure
the 1st seed is out of our reach. Way to be optimistic, though.
—Dave
by Dave on
Sep 18, 2008 11:40 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL
There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man β with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)
My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.
Season Tix: Section 315, with my sons
by johnv59 on
Sep 19, 2008 12:19 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
1st in NW.
I’ve been on record for month’s at 55-27.
1st in the NW and home court in the 1st
round. 3rd or 4th seed comes with Division
winner and like 1976-1977; It could happen.
We’ve both seen it happen Dave. This squad
is special, especially with GO the BEAST.
Too big and strong for 95% of the centers and
too quick for the other 5%. Why do you think
I got called a G_ _ F, when I was merely forcasting
upon the experience of 30 + years of BLAZERMANIA !
Now . . .
PLEASE get a DEAL DONE, COINCAST !!!
It's GO time !
by walkoff41 on
Sep 19, 2008 3:17 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"G__F"?!?
I have no idea what that represents.
What is this . . . “Hangman”?
"Mister Oden is a very, very big human being." - Jerryd Bayless
by QualityPie on
Sep 19, 2008 5:51 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Doubles Doods
Double Barrels
Double aughts
Boom Boom
"You better come harder than that, little man, your makin' me laugh" G.O.
by BlueBooYay on
Sep 19, 2008 8:52 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
GOOF...I think
"I figured out how to get the canoe down the mountain, but I will need a snow blower and all your butter"-Michael Kelso
by 92wastheyear on
Sep 20, 2008 9:49 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
O-72, O-75
BINGO!
"You better come harder than that, little man, your makin' me laugh" G.O.
by BlueBooYay on
Sep 20, 2008 10:47 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not taking a stand
Dave, while I appreciate the honest analysis, you fail to take a stand on your own two footed opinion. Ok, so we finish 7th in the Jerry Stackhoused Western Conference. It is where the Blazers should land barring injury, oppositional destruction, preferential treatment among league refs and the lucky bug. However, you still don’t tell us where YOU think these playoff thirsty gym rats of ours are likely finish the season. Or, are you just saving your actual prediction for a later post?
by PtownJake on
Sep 19, 2008 12:05 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
7th-9th isn't a stand?
That’s actually a fairly narrow range compared to what some are speculating. If I had to guess I’d say we would end up with the 8th seed by winning in the 46-49 range, but that’s just a guess. We’re probably going to dig a hole in the early season that we’ll have to get out of. How our confidence stands after the first six weeks of the season will determine a lot.
In any case I’m not really big on specific predictions. If anybody really could do that they wouldn’t be blogging, they’d be making millions in Vegas. Besides I’ve heard way too many people go back and only cite the predictions they made right, ignoring the 3/4 of them they blew. Besides people end up making purposely wild predictions just so they can look like geniuses the one time in fifty they come true. Sure you hit the inside straight every once in a blue moon, but that doesn’t mean it’s smart to draw to it. In short, I can’t tell you where Portland will end up, just where they will probably end up if things go to form.
—Dave
by Dave on
Sep 19, 2008 1:59 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I only make predictions
I know will happen. Which is why I predicted the Blazers will win 55 games this year. Ofcourse I may have also said they would win 50 in another post, but my most recent prediction is the most valid so I will stand with that until I need to predict it again.
by usmcr3049 on
Sep 19, 2008 8:13 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If healthy
55 wins. That will be somewhere between 3rd and 6th seed, depending on the health of other teams and how questions about chemistry in LA and Houston resolve themselves.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Sep 19, 2008 12:37 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I predict
86 wins, including the game where Oden yanks down the rim so hard that the Rose Garden collapses into a black hole taking away all of CERN’s glory…
+1 for the apocalypse…
I have my P.h.D in unreliable hyperbole.
by Eat Politicians on
Sep 19, 2008 12:38 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think that dunk would
also have to show evidence of the Higgs Boson for a dunk like that to take away CERNs glory.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Sep 20, 2008 11:42 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
CERN's LHC is leakin'
Black Holes?
We need these dunks to happen, for Science and PTB Fans alike.
"You better come harder than that, little man, your makin' me laugh" G.O.
by BlueBooYay on
Sep 20, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
maybe
but we would need a a theory that mates quantum mechanics onto curved space times to even predict the occurrence of blackholes and then we would need a way of separating the hawking radiation from the anisotropic (not the same at all points in space) cosmic microwave background to detect their presence.
Probably not happening anytime soon. Apparently the media has missed the point of the LHC and has chose to focus on the possibilities of black holes, but since the current energy of the LHC is less than that of other particle acclerators, why isnt the media worrying about black holes in those accelerators?
Silly
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Sep 20, 2008 2:10 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Obviously it's a big "if," but ...
If Oden comes out strong and doesn’t tire out during the season — and also if any one of Rudy, Bayless or Webster reaches his potential — then you have to look at the Blazers from other teams’ point of view for a second. They’re going to be saying, “How do we stop that guy in the middle? And even if we do, how do we handle the rest of those guys? Our bench can’t even match up to their bench. We just don’t have an answer for that team.”
I do think the Blazers will have three drawbacks:
- They won’t always gel.
- They’ll start to get tired later in the season.
- They’ll struggle against a more experienced playoff team.
And yet, name a team that can just put the Blazers away. I think the Blazers are going to be everybody else’s problem instead of the other way around, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see them finish very high.
by Kaboomm on
Sep 19, 2008 1:31 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree.
The opposite teams will have a lot of problems at every position if our team play completely all out all the time, both in offense and defense, using its depth at the bench. What will be their prize after they have fought against our starters?. A fresh player almost so good as the starter and who plays also completely all out all the time. We can do that because we have many players who can create their own shot, we wonΒ΄t be depending on our starters or a single player (I mean Outlaw last season) to keep scoring. The Blazers have players to play many different systems, so it will be tough for opposite coaches and players. But it doesnΒ΄t work out if Dave is right and we need Oden, LMA and Roy playing 38 minutes per game instead of about 30-32 minutes.
s there are that depth and variety of players The team can play
The Midnight Rambler. Born to make mistakes.
by amlmart1 on
Sep 19, 2008 2:43 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I question the fandom of people who think the Blazers will lose a game
No rational person can honestly expect this team to lose a game. When your worst player is Raef LaFrenz, you’re team is stacked! I think that guy was an all star once.
I won’t make a prediction now, simply because every now and then a team gets lucky and steals a game. The Blazers have like 17 all stars on the roster and now Nate, from his Olympic experience, knows how to coach a roster full of all stars.
This discussion should be about the Blazers being the first team ever to have 8 all stars in one season and be the first team to go undefeated in the NBA.
Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision
by tominhawaii on
Sep 20, 2008 4:51 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry, Tom
but I do think the Blazers will lose a game or two.
This year, that is.
I also think we’ll probably only have 6 all-stars this year. League politics and all that will make it hard to get more.
And only five of our guys will be all-star starters, even though eight of them will deserve it.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Sep 21, 2008 8:38 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your fandom is on notice!
Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision
by tominhawaii on
Sep 21, 2008 3:16 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think
that most people had already noticed my fan dumb.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Sep 22, 2008 12:36 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No, but I did notice that joke dumb!
"Personally, I'd rather give an elephant a prostate exam on Chili Day." --Dave on rooting for the Lakers or Celtics
by MiledAnimal on
Sep 22, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL
That is no great accomplishment.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Sep 22, 2008 10:46 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't STRONGLY disagree
But there’s a couple points to be made. First, Oden and Rudy aren’t typical rookies. GO has had the advantage of spending a season watching and travelling with his soon-to-be team. He’s received coaching, watched film, gotten NBA fitness training, even walked thru practices. So he’s really a “rookie & a half” at worst. As for Rudy, he’s been a pro hoopster for many years now, and has played at a high level on the international stage—including against the US Olympians. So while these guys will need to go thru an adjustment process in adapting to the NBA, I expect them to be playing like young veterans by midseason.
The other point: one injury to a key Jazz player (with the Blazers staying healthy), and the Blazers get the #4 seed. (Sorry Nuggets fans, but without Camby your team is toast.) Not to jinx the Jazz, but I think they’re about due for some misfortune. All teams run into it from time to time…
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on
Sep 19, 2008 2:01 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Something I mentioned once before...
…is the late Stephen J. Gould’s theory of “punctuated equilibium.” Not that long ago, it was universally accepted that evolution is a very slow, gradual process. But Gould discovered that, in fact, things tend to remain unchanged for a long time, then suddenly snap into a new state of equilbrium. For species, this means going unchanged for millions of years, then dramatically transforming—or going extinct—in a span of as little as a few generations. For basketball teams, it can mean going from the top to the cellar, or from the cellar to championship contention, in just a season or two.
Ironically, the Trailblazers are one of the teams that has experienced a dramatic leap forward: from missing the playoffs in ‘’75-’76 to winning it all in ‘76-’77. They were extremely young—like the current Blazer team—but they had a great young center and an infusion of talented players who were rookies in name only (Lucas and Twardzic). Along with these factors, the team had a culture of unselfishness and teamwork. Sound familiar?
Does that mean I expect the Blazers to win a championship this season? No. (I’m not "Hurryup ‘09 for nothing!) But it could happen. And they CERTAINLY could beat out the Jazz for the 4th seed. The key for this team will be to not go into an early tailspin as they suffer through a tough early schedule while figuring out how to play together. And a timely injury or two to the Jazz wouldn’t hurt. (Sorry Jazz fans!)
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on
Sep 19, 2008 2:18 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Now what came earlier, the "Tipping Point" or the "Punctuated Equilibrium" :-)
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paintβprairie grass, blown by wind.
by Norsktroll on
Sep 19, 2008 2:47 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good "point."
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on
Sep 19, 2008 10:02 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Last year's Celtics anyone?
" the project of Portland brings me good sensations..."
- Rudy Fernandez
translated by animart1
by ghostdog on
Sep 19, 2008 4:32 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's cool to jinx the Jazz.
No worries.
Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision
by tominhawaii on
Sep 20, 2008 4:52 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good analysis, and I agree with the 7th or 8th seed as a realistic target (as I project us to have a little less than 50 wins)
I have not much to add to your statements about the teams still ranking above or around us (I think Dallas will be better than at the end of last year with two good additions and a new coaching style, but that’s just me). Yet you are really underestimating one team by only mentioning them in one passing sentence: THE LA CLIPPERS
Don’t laugh, I’m not a fan of the team, and I think losing Brand hurt them enormously as compared to a Brand-Baron team that would be almost a lock for the playoffs every year. But they can still put on a good fight. A) They didn’t have him almost all season, just like we didn’t have Oden, so nothing is lost compared to a year ago. B) They recovered pretty quickly from that defection, and managed to get Camby for nothing from Denver. You say his loss “may hurt more than they realize”, and I agree since he is one of the best defensive big men at least on the weak side on an awful defensive team. But then, why should he not also help the Clippers a lot? He is angry and wants to prove that this “trade” was ridiculous, and if Kaman 2.0 shows up again that’s a potent front court able to hang with the best in the West. Add to that Tim Thomas and their two or three other big men, and they have a nice depth of good players there.
Same goes for the PG position, Baron Davis backed up by Jason Williams and Jason Hart is arguably better than in whatever order you sort our PGs. On small forward, the additional loss of Maggette as their top scorer hurts, but Thornton showed signs of being a player not much unlike Travis last season and should be a solid starter for them. And Ricky Davis is an awful defender and locker room cancer, but offensively you could just as well start him. On SG Mobley is declining, but still okay, and they found a nice backup with Gordon in the draft who should be able to contribute a bit from the beginning.
To me, that looks like a team with a good mix of experience and youth able to sneak into the playoffs just as well as our more talented but still very young team. I think we finish ahead of the Clippers, but that’s not guaranteed in any way.
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paintβprairie grass, blown by wind.
by Norsktroll on
Sep 19, 2008 2:07 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good points
…except the one about Ricky Davis. That was a stretcher. Davis is a cancer in EVERY respect. He can score, but not with a game on the line. I LOVE to see him in the opposing team’s line-up. Poor character always reveals itself under pressure…
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on
Sep 19, 2008 2:23 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He is inconsistent game to game, but over a season he has put up the same numbers for about five years now
Last year he even improved his 3pt shooting to over 40%. And played again in 82 games, coming right into his prime, which is important on a team that also has guys like Mobley who could crack down without notice.
Mike Dunleavy Sr. will get (or lose) a few more grey hairs over him, but if he manages to keep Davis even somewhat motivated I think that was a decent pick up for the Clippers (and a horrible lease by Miami, since they gave a draft pick and took on Blount to get him for a year).
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paintβprairie grass, blown by wind.
by Norsktroll on
Sep 19, 2008 2:45 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Plus Davis has a way of
"Screw the chalupa β itβs the victory I want." --timg56
by MiledAnimal on
Sep 19, 2008 10:39 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Numbers, schmumbers
Stats are so overrated. Guys like Davis put up points in bunches during garbage time—not when it counts. Compare that to a guy like Brandon Roy, who scores at key moments—for instance to stop another team’s run. Can I cite stats to prove my point? Sorry. But I’ve seen enough of Ricky Davis to know he’s a stat-monger, not a winner.
I’ll never forget the game vs the Blazers two seasons ago, when Davis scored and talked trash all game long. Then at the end, after he failed to intimidate LMA at the foul line, Davis had a wide-open 12-footer to win the game for the Clips. Air ball!! (Or did the shot barely chip the front rim? My memory may have enhanced that glorious failure.)
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on
Sep 19, 2008 11:16 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oops
Davis wasn’t a Clipper then, was he? There’s that foggy memory again.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on
Sep 19, 2008 11:18 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That would have been Minnesota or even Boston
Yeah, Davis is too selfish and never made the most out of his undeniable potential. I wouldn’t want to rest my team on his shoulders. But they got him for a fair contract, and he should be able to contribute and make up for the loss of Maggette together with the other wings. And Dave tried to discuss rather team performance than individual players, so I know this is already going into too much detail.
St. Bayno's 120 Haiku Prospects: Nicolas Batum in the paintβprairie grass, blown by wind.
by Norsktroll on
Sep 19, 2008 11:45 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If the Los Angeles Clippers could somehow ...
package Cuttino Mobley, Tim Thomas, and a 2009 first-round draft pick (via the Minnesota Timberwolves {Top-10 Protected Through 2011 & Unprotected In 2012}) to the New Jersey Nets for Vince Carter and Sean Williams, then that team would be a force to be reckoned with this season. That’d get Carter out of New Jersey and place him nearby one of his harshest critics, Phil Jackson, which’d provide him the opportunity to redeem his tarnished image as a failure and a quitter.
Anyhow, with the recent acquisition of Marcus Camby — whose face-to-the-basket game on offense and talents as a weakside help defender have always made him a natural power forward rather than a traditional pivotman — Elgin Baylor might as well make another big splash to allow the Clippers a legitimate chance to immediately contend for the playoffs. A potential lineup of Chris Kaman, Camby, Al Thornton, Carter, and Baron Davis would create a potent quintet.
by AK1984 on
Sep 19, 2008 7:48 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sorry, I just don't see it
The clippers are mis-mash of players who’s games don’t fit together well. Davis is a selfish point guard, Kaman is a Center who needs to be fed in the post to be effective, Davis is a chucker without a cause, Thornton is an unknown who has only shown some flashes, and while Camby is good defensively, it is not enough to overcome the expressway that will be lane. The Clippers really screwed up by not resigning Brand, with Brand they were a 7-8th seed, without him they are below .500.
by usmcr3049 on
Sep 19, 2008 8:37 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was gonna comment about the same thing
I’m not sure whether the Clips will be able to put the pieces that they have together, but I thought they deserved more than a passing sentence. I would put them more towards the Golden State/Denver group as one of the ones that the Blazers should be playing against them like they are playing a playoff game every time they meet up.
by einman77 on
Sep 19, 2008 11:08 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I say 48 wins and an 8th seed
I donβt really expect Oden to come out and win games for us until late in the season. Iβm looking for improved play from Martell and pleasant surprises from Rudy and Bayless to keep us afloat until Oden really arrives. I think Aldridge too will become more of a force for us taking away from Brandon’s fame a little. If all of this plays out I can see us winning 47-50 games. Iβm callin the Spurs as a 7th seed too. Lookin forward to that matchup with the l*kers.
by Croatian_Sensation on
Sep 19, 2008 2:42 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
An "unbiased opinion" from a Nuggets fan
Jeremy from Pickaxe And Roll says (in a post eerily similar to this one, but about The Nugs…)
As far as Portland, I could see them finishing with 55 wins and I could see them finishing with 41 again. I believe there will be an adjustment period as they add Greg Oden to their rotation and I also think Oden will struggle too, at least over the first month or two of the season. On the other hand a crunch time lineup of Brandon Roy, Rudy Fernandez, LaMarcus Aldridge, Greg Oden and Travis Outlaw/Jerryd Bayless/Martell Webster sounds pretty formidable.
" the project of Portland brings me good sensations..."
- Rudy Fernandez
translated by animart1
by ghostdog on
Sep 19, 2008 5:12 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That's the most sensible Blazers season prediction I've yet heard.
Anything between 41 and 55 is not merely possible, but would even be unsurprising.
How can I give this “Jeremy” a rec?
"Mister Oden is a very, very big human being." - Jerryd Bayless
by QualityPie on
Sep 19, 2008 5:56 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
6th Seed
52 wins. I have high hopes, can you blame me? Trust me, I would settle for 8th. However, while watching the last game of the season against Phoenix I made a little “friendly” wager with a friend of mine. I said we would be 6th (and this was before Rudy commited to coming over). I bet $100. So, not only would I be extremely happy if we made the playoffs at all, let alone 6th, I would be $100 richer :)
"It is an unique experience that I wanted to live. Turns out well or bad, I will have lived through it and it would not be a failure if I return soon. I am ready for this challenge "
~Rudy Fernandez
Ugh..."Rudy Fernandez will go to Portland next Sunday accompanied of his mother, Maite, who will live with him in Portland the first two years". Not cool Rudy, not cool.
by twiggs on
Sep 19, 2008 7:03 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That's a great game to make a bet during
Portland didn’t even seem to bother showing up that night, any fan would think they stunk.
by Timmay! on
Sep 19, 2008 10:01 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't have a clue as to what seed they will get.
I’m not going to predict something without at least having some idea of what this team looks like out on the floor. Let alone how other teams are going to perform.
As I’ve stated before, I think Greg Oden represents an additional ten wins. The trick is, does the rest of the team play at least to the level they did last season. If so, then Portland should crack the 50 win mark. Doing that would be my objective for this team. Where that puts us in the playoff seeding is anybody’s guess. It should at least get us in the playoffs. Once there, anything can happen.
I also think that one of the early keys for the Blazers will be how the officials react to Oden. I don’t remember specifically how Shaq was called his first few seasons in the league. I seem to recall that the officials gave him wide latitude almost from the start. The guy was so big and so fast and so overpowering that they hadn’t really seen a player like that. The result was they tended to overlook the fact he travelled on almost every play and saw the contact in terms of the defender trying to react, not O’Neill barrelling into them.
From what I’m hearing, Oden’s footwork is far superior to what Shaq’s was. And everyone is saying he is a physical beast on the court, not only the biggest player, but one of the fastest. If the officials give him any benefit of doubt on contact calls, Oden is going to be unstoppable down low and will be getting lots of opportunity at the charity stripe. Should this happen, Greg will have a major impact even if he has to spend half the game on the bench due to defensive fouls. That’s pretty much the worst case as I see it. Oden should be able to average 15 pts and 10 rebounds with just 25 minutes of PT. Plug that into the starting lineup and you get at least 5 extra victories.
hakkaa pÀÀlle !
by timg56 on
Sep 19, 2008 7:33 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I've got the Portland Trailblazers ...
finishing at the 8th seed with a 44-38 record.
by AK1984 on
Sep 19, 2008 7:38 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Dave...
an exercise in auto-eroticism
“seeding” takes on a second meaning here, doesn’t it? Intended? If so, hilarious.
BRANDON ROY GET WELL SOON
by Ben. on
Sep 19, 2008 8:24 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good thing we don't have Kemp anymore.
Although when it comes time to reap what he hath sown, we’ll have a close look at Junior.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Sep 19, 2008 8:35 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
lol
very nice…
have seen one of the shawn kemp jr.’s play, and he can ball.
BRANDON ROY GET WELL SOON
by Ben. on
Sep 19, 2008 8:36 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I imagine his mom can say the same thing about his daddy.
hakkaa pÀÀlle !
by timg56 on
Sep 19, 2008 11:29 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm a little slow
It took me four or five times reading this to get it. Then I smiled. Then I pictured Kemp making babies left and right … like, the act of it … and I winced. Now I feel dirty, with a little remorse. Probably a lot like the the feeling you get after making babies left and right.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Sep 19, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"If these same players were wearing Clippers uniforms what would we think?"
I’d cry my eyes out ….
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Sep 19, 2008 8:25 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Seriously! I know dave's trying to be objective
But, if I had to play a starting lineup of Blake, Roy, Webster, Aldrigdge and Oden; with a backup of Pryz, Frye, Rudy, Bayless and Outlaw, I’d think I was in for long night.
I don’t know if that’s how you meant your comment, but if I try to look at our team from our opponents’ eyes (which I think is a good means of objectivity), I don’t think many of them look at us and think “this’ll be W”.
by Montavilla Steve on
Sep 19, 2008 11:21 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A mighty fine analysis Dave.
I’m partial to your analytical, realistic thinking.
My predictions for the season are right there where yours are regarding the Blazers —-although not necessarily so with a couple of the other teams.
I'm just a modest guy with much to be modest about
by TwoDeep on
Sep 19, 2008 8:33 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Kinda hard to predict
I think it’s pretty safe to say that barring any major injuries to Roy or Oden, then we should be around 50 wins and definitely in the playoffs. I think we could possibly survive a loss of Aldridge for awhile. His game is going to be away from the basket a lot, and we all know what Channing can do if given the opportunity. If Roy or Oden don’t play at least 65-70 games a piece this year, we’re totally screwed.
myspace.com/marktwainindians
by mark twain on
Sep 19, 2008 8:33 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Predictions are hard
Only fools and insiders bet big on sports.
I can only speak/think as a fan, so I avoid sports gambles.
That said, a big season is expected. 50+ wins is very possible.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Sep 19, 2008 8:36 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
4ht Through 9th Seem Plausible, 6th or 7th Probable
There are way too many variables for any of us to say that our “guestimates” are anything other than what they are.
I tend to be a bit more optimistic than Dave. My optimism is fueled by memories of “77 and ’89: I think big jumps are more common than we acknowledge. There is something to the idea of "critical mass.” I think the Blazer’s have assembled dominant talent. The question in my mind is: how long will it take for these young guys to learn how to use their talent to win? I keep hearing Steve Jones saying, “these guys need to learn how to win.” When they do, watch out.
I expect the Blazers to be good and getting better as the season progresses. They will win some games against great teams, they will loose some games against crummy teams. They will be streaky and inconsistent as they learn how to win. I expect them to be dominant at home and mediocre on the road. Good young teams almost always do much better at home. By the second half of the season, I expect them to start winning more consistently.
Regarding individual players here are the results of my crystal ball gazing. Take this with a huge grain of salt:
Roy will get even better at knowing when to assert himself. His scoring will be slightly higher and more efficient.
LA will become more dominant, 20/7 with greater efficiency.
GO will average 12/8 before the all-star break and 16/11 after. His presence in the lane will help the Blazers lower their opponents FG% significantly.
Martell will make significant strides. He will still be inconsistent, but he will benefit the most from other teams trying to handle GO and LA on the inside.
Blake will continue to be Blake. Steady, smart, hard-working and limited.
JBay will be inconsistent. He will show flashes of brilliance and bouts of frustration with not getting as big of role as he is used to. By the all-star break his defense will be notably better than Blake’s against the quick PGs in the league and he will start to settle into a larger role. His play-making skills will be better than many fear, but his assist/turnover ratio will be bad as he learns. Blake will continue to start, but JBay will start seeing more time in the fourth.
Rudy will gradually adjust. Language will be an issue that will affect his ability to communicate with the coaches and his teammates. It will take a while for his teammates to learn how to take advantage of his skills. He is relentless w/o the ball and the team will need to learn how to hit him when he is open. He will make defensive mistakes as he learns when to switch and when to gamble. Mac will experiment with 3-guard line-ups in order to get Rudy and JBay more minutes and more fire power on the court. Rudy will not be able to defend most three. Roy will end up playing 5-10 minutes of “point forward” a-la Pippen. This will prove generally successful.
Frye and Pryz will be solid contributors. Frye will help spread the floor and Mac will experiment with using him with GO while have LA’s minutes overlap with the second unit.
TO will continue to score effectively, however the arrival of Rudy, JBay, and the improvement of Frye will make that scoring less important. TO’s minutes and shots will be down slightly, especially after Frye returns from surgery. TO will be the most likely rotation player to be moved in a trade.
Sergio and Diogu will find it difficult to earn minutes because of the log jam of players in front of them.
How they do in the playoffs will depend on the match-ups.
By opening day of ’09, ever team in the league will fear the Blazers.
by upper left corner on
Sep 19, 2008 8:42 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Big jump: most recent example NO
New Orleans went from a 9 seed to a 2 seed last year. We are poised to take a similar jump. One can’t anticipate such a jump, but they do happen. The Blazers really came together in the 2nd half of last season. I’d expect that we come out slowly like last year, however we should put together more consistency earlier in the season than last year (ie late November not late December).
by NWfan on
Sep 19, 2008 11:49 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
6th Seed
Most optimistic: 34-28 after 62 games.
That is where I’m not sure, since the first 20 games are tough. Dig too big of a hole then +6 with 20 games left becomes much more difficult. Starting 5-15 makes 48 wins and the playoffs a long-shot, need to be 10-10 after the 1st 20.
Confident of 15-5 over the last 20 regardless of the record to this point. Best finish: 49-33. Only losses are to the higher seeds over the last 20.
Difference between 6th and 9th, maybe 2 games.
This season, especially early, will come down to how the team handles the last 5 minutes of the game. I figure the team will do better than last year
+ GO – should be worth 2 defensive rebounds, 1 offensive rebound and 2 points on the putback
+ LMA – 1 defensive rebound and 2 points
+ BRoy – 1 play off a defensive board and 2 points
+ Bayless – 1 steal
+ TO/Martell – 1 Block
overall, its about limiting the other teams possessions in my mind, so on average, there are 4 less possessions for the opponent than last year in the last 5 mins and +6 points for the Blazers. i haven’t done the analysis to see what that would do to last years record, but it takes a run out of the other team and makes close games not so close. same thoughts for end of quarters, but gotta get to work…
by DucRider on
Sep 19, 2008 9:25 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i disagree about your catogories
i would put teams like this
Pretty obvious top seeds
1. Hornets
2. Lakers
Almost guaranteed the playoffs
3. Jazz
4. Spurs
5. Rockets
In the playoffs last year but got worse
6. Suns
7. Mavericks
8. Nuggets
Missed the playoffs last year but improved
9. Blazers
10. Clippers
Missed the playoffs last but got worse
11. Warriors
Based on that I see seed 6-10 as possibilities.
I really think that if the blazers continue their arc of development, from the last two years, they can easily grab the sixth seed.
by Zaron5551 on
Sep 19, 2008 9:42 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I was so on board with what you wrote
Then you said we should easily grab the 6th seed. That means that we could easily overcome strong teams with talented veterans in Phoenix and Dallas. Seriously, they are older, but they are not just going to fall off the map. We could get lucky, but make no mistake about it, they are going to be tough teams and our young guys are still a long way to go. They may have a slight chance to get there, but it is not going to be easy by any stretch of the imagination.
I will say that I like how you broke that down.
by einman77 on
Sep 19, 2008 11:20 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i don't think Jason Kidd can mesh very well with the rest of the Mavs team same goes for Phoenix, Shaq will never fit well with that team
I’m not saying there players are going to be bad I just don’t think that either team will be able to mesh very well. Basically I’m counting on good chemistry from the Blazers and bad chemistry from the Mavs and Suns
by Zaron5551 on
Sep 19, 2008 12:27 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
my humble prediction
I think the Blazers end up with the 4th seed, behind the l*kers, hornets and Jazz… unfortunately that means we lose the first round in 6 to the Spurs
"And with the number one pick, the Earth shook"
by fromagnon on
Sep 19, 2008 9:46 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
4th?
I think 7-9 is pretty reasonable, but finishing 4th is certainly not too far out there, either. If we win our division, we’ll probably have fewer wins than whichever of New Orleans or San Antonio gets second in their division. When you’re talking about final finish, 2 games can separate 3 positions in the playoff seedings. With that in mind, our 4 games against the Jazz could be huge. That’s a potential 8 game swing in our relative positions. If we play about the same or even a bit worse against the rest of the league, but sweep the Jazz, we could take the division. Not saying that’s going to happen or very likely, but it’s certainly worth remembering and hoping for.
That being said, I think we finish 6th, beating out Dallas and Phoenix, with LA Clippers and Denver in 9 & 10.
< /war >
by Diesel10 on
Sep 19, 2008 10:22 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
good point
but i’d Ilike to point out that it is only a 4 game swing not 8 games. That is becasue each win counts as a 1/2 game as does each loss. However head to head wins are key because they do have twice the effect in the standings as games against common opponents.
by NWfan on
Sep 19, 2008 11:56 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks
I couldn’t remember if it was a 4 or 8 game swing, and couldn’t figure it out because I hadn’t had any coffee yet. I just went with 8 because it bolstered my point better. Silly reality, getting in the way of my beliefs….
< /war >
by Diesel10 on
Sep 19, 2008 12:21 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Great write up...
Dave thanks for the insight…
I agree with almost everything you said, with one exception and that would be the placement of Houston. I respect the talent that Houston has put together, but I don’t think it helps the team win this season. I feel that Yao’s participation in the Olympics will have an impact on his health, especially at the start of the season. The addition of Ron Artest is good on paper, but not in practice. I think he becomes a distraction that damages the chemistry of the team. I think that we will see Houston at a 7 or 8 seed this year.
This will hopefully push Portland to a 6 or 7 seed.
If you let them make you, they'll make you into paper mache.
At a distance you're strong until the wind comes, then you'll crumble and blow away.
- Incubus
by ZooooomByU on
Sep 19, 2008 10:27 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
top of the pack
As a Nuggets fan who has closely been watching the Blazers since the latter portion of last season, I see a contender in the making. Remember, earlier on last season, the Blazers were en route to a 50 win season WITHOUT oden, rudy, OR bayless. These three could all be top ten rookies this season, and I think the Blazers could have kept the momentum from that 12-game streak if various untimely injuries had not occurred. Assuming the Blazers stay healthy (and by that, I mean every starter plays 70+ games, and no key player gets sidelined for several months), I think they are a 55-win team. They’re young, hungry, excited, and everything in the news about them lately has been good news. This must be great for their confidence. They have a tough beginning at the season, but just stealing a few games against strong teams could even further boost their confidence to propel them later in the season when their schedule eases up some. Greg Oden will continue to improve as the season progresses, and I think we can safely assume the same for Fernandez and Bayless. Aldridge has more size to hold his own against the HUGE front courts of the West, Blake is looking great and understands his role for the team, and Webster, Frye, and Outlaw all seem to be in the best shape of their lives. Oden might not be that great on offense in his first season, but I think we can expect at least 8-10 rebs per game in his first season, along with 2-3 blocked shots. We don’t have any Steve Nash-like passers (with the possible exception of Blake due to his efficiency), but everyone on the team CAN pass (like the Lakers for the most part). Roy is only going to get better, and again, everyone on the team is young. I think if you look at “overachieving” teams in the past, usually they’re young, energetic guys that are just playing their hearts out. This team is the Hornets of this year. Sure, they lack experience and veteran leadership, but I think as the season progresses it will become more obvious who should be on the team for the long haul, and who doesn’t really fit. Trade whoever doesn’t fit (and whoever that is I’m sure will have trade value, because the Blazers are 10-11 players deep) for a veteran role player, and I think they will have that one last missing piece. In conclusion, I think this team WILL BE a championship contender THIS YEAR. They will probably finish 3rd or 4th, definitely behind LA and New Orleans. I’m not sold on Utah staying at the top of the pack (I just don’t see that much going for them, Boozer isn’t as good as some people seem to think, they’re soft except Deron Williams, and Jerry Sloan can kind of be a tool and anger his players).The Spurs will be there come playoff time, but with Ginobili out early on and some serious depth issues, I don’t think they’ll be a major threat in the regular season as far as being a top 4 seed. The Mavs are falling fast, the Suns might be able to stay in the pack until Shaq’s limbs fall off. The only team besides LA and New Orleans and Portland that I would say might pose a real, legitimate, scary threat is Houston; but I’m not sold on Houston either, since the core 3 are all seriously injury prone, and I don’t think any of those three guys have the winning mentality that Roy, Oden, Fernandez, Bayless, Aldridge, and Blake have. Blazers won’t win the championship this year, I think they’re too young and inexperienced. But they WILL overachieve, provide injuries don’t get in the way. If only the Nuggets were as good as your team…
by jbock37 on
Sep 19, 2008 10:32 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
also
I think the measure of a great team is how good its passing and rebounding skills are. Assuming the players can produce offensively as well, I think everything just kind of follows after these two basic skills. With Oden, Pryzbilla, ALdridge, Frye, and even guards with above-average rebounding skills, the Blazers will have great rebounding abilities. Again, no “great” passers on the team, but the Lakers don’t have any “great” passers either (despite being one of the best passing teams in the league due to the Triangle Offense). Most importantly, the core players on the Blazers are very unselfish, and they all can dish the ball at least a few times a game. Ball movement is crucial between all five men on the court, and that should not be a problem at all for the Blazers. Nate McMillian is also good at pulling the right strings on teams with a lot of depth (remember the Sonics team that was supposed to finish last in their division, but ended up finishing 3rd in the West and taking the Spurs to six hard-fought games in the WC semifinals?). This team is ready.
No offense, Dave, but because you are such a dedicated fan, and dedicated fans often over-value their teams, I think you tried going with the reverse (under-valuing the team). That’s not a bad thing, it just shows how conscious you are of making ridiculously outlandish projections. But sometimes what seems impossible does happen, just like the Hornets (and Lakers) finishing at the top of the pack last season. Nobody saw that before the season began.
by jbock37 on
Sep 19, 2008 10:42 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
agreed again
(but we usually say L*ker here so as not to offend the nose.)
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Sep 19, 2008 10:49 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I prefer "L@kers"
it’s prettier than “L*kers”, of course a pig in lipstick is still a pig, despite what color lipstick it’s wearing.
by NWfan on
Sep 19, 2008 12:02 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And, of course, two asterisks in a post put the stuff in between into bold type.
So if you use “L*kers” twice in the same post, it just turns into half-bold garbage, like the McCain campaign.
Myself, I prefer “L[xxx]rs”.
"Mister Oden is a very, very big human being." - Jerryd Bayless
by QualityPie on
Sep 19, 2008 6:00 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice "best-case-scenario" post
But please add a few paragraph breaks next time!
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on
Sep 19, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Oops!!
That comment was intended as a reply to jbock37’s “top of the pack” post—not as a comment on Dave’s piece.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on
Sep 19, 2008 11:24 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Sorry about that, I typed that up while I was in class pretending to listen to my professor lecture… so I was just writing my stream of consciousness without any breaks in my thought. Will put more time into presentation next time I make a comment.
About the L*kers, I’ll admit, they’re one of my favorite teams after the Nuggets and Blazers. But there are several NBA teams I like because I like to watch almost every team play… and then I begin to respect a lot of them (except the Rockets). Anyway, out of respect for the group, I’ll watch how I spell L@kers.
by jbock37 on
Sep 19, 2008 1:46 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I have only one thing to add
If we score the 7th seed, we will make the WCF.
Why? Because we will likely draw the Hornets, whom we could upset in a hard-fought 7 game series as long as Oden is healthy and in some kind of “pseudo-sophomore” rhythm. The sheer fanbase-fueled insanity of a second round series will propel us past the remaining obstacle, leaving us smack dab in the WCF as the Cinderella story of the entire season.
Then, a crushing defeat to the Spurs or Rockets on their way to winning it all.
That’s my story. And I’m sticking to it.
"Life is a meaningless sequence of events in between Blazer championships"
by broggerboy19 on
Sep 19, 2008 1:27 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd rather crush the L@kers.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Sep 19, 2008 1:28 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Lakers would be afraid to play us
They know they can’t beat us at home, so they’d be feeling a tremendous amount of pressure to win all their home games — assuming they had a higher seed. We all know the Lakers wilt under pressure, and Kobe makes things worse by harping on his teammates.
Nothing against Andrew Bynum, but I cannot wait to see Oden brush him aside repeatedly each time we play the Lakers. And the shocked look on Kobe’s face when he tries to dunk over GO…
"Screw the chalupa β itβs the victory I want." --timg56
by MiledAnimal on
Sep 19, 2008 2:32 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
7th at best. For now.
I think the Blazers can get 7th in the west. I’d love to say higher, but that would be too much too soon. 45-37 is what I predict their record to be. As for the playoffs, I’d say second round is very reachable. They made great strides last year, and calling the Blazers a playoff team this year isn’t out of the question. The time is now to show and prove. It’ll be tough in the stacked west. Phoenix, San Antonio, Utah, Dallas, even G State. Some of many good teams in the west, but I believe the Blazers can do great things this year and make some good strides.
by CanadianBlazerfan on
Sep 19, 2008 7:55 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I think I'm going to write a fanpost about this.
Ha ha, I kill me.
But seriously folks. 82-0, number one seed, never lose a game, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. My fanpost would just be the schedule with a “W” next to each game, and the summary would be, “Greg Oden dunked on (insert name of team’s franchise player)’s head.”
Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision
by tominhawaii on
Sep 20, 2008 5:18 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs






















