55-27
First, this might get very long, so be warned. Second, I was inspired by SamGoody's fan post about how the Blazers should look more at the division crown, than just making the playoffs. Personally I believe the Blazers will make the playoffs this year, and after doing some research, I think they will beat the Jazz out and get the number 4 seed as well. The following is how I came to this conclusion.
First I researched the Jazz, what moves they made this summer to get better, and how their returning players might improve. A couple of things came up, first, and maybe more important, is that there are rumors flying about Carlos Boozer. The Jazz owner recently talked about it and basically said, they will not break the bank to keep him at the end of this season, stateing, "we will not be a luxury tax paying team". Boozer has a player option for next season, most "experts" are predicting he will decline it and go into a very big FA market where many teams will have enough cap room to offer big dollars. (How would OKC look with Boozer in their line up?)
Boozer is not the only important Jazz member with a player option though, Mehmet Okur does as well, it is unknown which way he is leading, but for the sake of arguement lets say he picks up the option for $9 million, that along with Williams's new extention, (approx $16.6 million starting next year) the Jazz will have about $64million committed in salaries. (this is assuming they can't unload the Russian on someone)
According to the NBA Salary Cap FAQ the Luxury tax for the 2008-2009 season is set at $71.15 million, which means the Jazz only have about $7 million to spend on Boozer if they want to stay below the cap. I doubt Boozer takes a pay cut from his $11.6 million dollar salary to help them out, (we all know Boozer goes where the cash is at, just ask Cleveland). So Basically the Jazz have to unload Andrei Kirilenko or they will watch Boozer bolt. Their problems could be lessened if Okur declines his player option and they renounce him, as that would free up $9 million more for Boozer, which should please him.
The point of all of that, was this; The Jazz players have alot of their minds this season, so their concentration may not be where it needs to be at in a tough conference.
Now add to that, the only move they made in the offseason was trading their back up poing, for another back up point, and their two main stars playing all summer for the Olympics and this team could not be much better than last year,(54-28) infact it could even be worse.
With all this in mind I looked at their schedule, and played out each game to see what I believe their record will look like at the end of the season.
November 13-5
- The Jazz have a pretty easy early schedule, only 5 games against playoff team from last year, although 4 of them are on the road.
- They have 1 five game east coast road trip that is 7days long.
December 8-7
- Their easy early schedule takes a harder turn in Dec with 8 games against playoff teams
- another five game trip, this time it is 9 days
- Only 6 of their 15 games are at home where they are at their best.
January 9-6
- 8 games against last years playoff teams but many are at home
- longest road trip is 3 games
- 8 of 15 games are in Utah
Feburary 9-2
- The All-Star month should be good to the Jazz
- Only 4 games against playoff teams
- 8 of 11 are in Utah
- all 3 road games are against non-playoff teams
March 8-7
- The Jazz better do well in Feb, because March and April will test them
- 9 of 15 games against playoff teams
- 5game east coast trip over 8 days
- only 6 of 15 at home
April 4-4
- I don't see how the Jazz finish better than .500 in April
- 5 of 8 against playoff teams
- 5 of 8 on the road and
- 3 back to backs in a short about of time.
That adds up to a 51-31 total predicted record for the Utah Jazz. 3 games worse than last year. Last year the Jazz struggled through the first 2 months of the season before turning it on, if they do that again this year, they might just lose out on the Division Crown.
So, after I looked up the Jazz, I turned to Portland, we all know what they have done this summer, what new players are being added, etc... so I won't go over that accept for a few predictions on individual players.
- Oden will be a monster This Year. I want to temper my expectations, but my heart tells me this kid could avg close to 18pts, 11rebs and 2.5 blks and Win the ROY trophy.
- LaMarcus will avg 20+ and make the all star team along with Oden and Roy, although it might take an injury to a player selected by fans to get him in.
- Roy will avg about the same points as last year, but more assists and rebounds, and the same great 4th quarters.
So taking everything the Blazers did over the summer, including how they will basically have no distractions what so ever, I took a look at their schedule. We all heard about the tough start, but I wanted to really dig into it and see for myself what I believed this team was capable of.
November 10-8
- Yes that is not a typo. I believe this team can go 10-8 to start off the season
- only 7 of 18 are at home, 10 are against playoff teams from last year, there are 5 back to backs, and 1 five game road trip that will take 9 days.
- But they play the T-Wolves twice, Golden State once, Sacramento twice, and Miami twice all of which are winnable games.
- of the playoff teams they play the Hornets twice, but they played very well against them last season at home, which one of these is. The Lakers on opening night in LA is also a winnable game and who knows how good the Suns will be this year, (2 games against them)
- it is a tough start, but this team can get through it at or above .500 I am sure of it.
December 11-3
- December is where this team will make its first run. It starts off with 5 game road trip that will take 8 days, but with games against the Knicks, and Wizards as well as a big hyped up game against Boston, I think this team will be up to the challenge. Still a record of 2 and 3 on this trip is still very good.
- After that trip the team has basically a really long home stand. 8 of their last 10 games are at home with trips to only Utah and Denver. All of them are winninable games.
- 11 of the 14 games are against playoff teams from last year, but here is the catch. Those teams are: The Wizards, Celtics x2, Raptors x2, Denver x2, Magic, Jazz, Suns and Mavs. Of those teams only the Celtics have a talent advantage over the Blazers. The teams they play twice are home and home series, and 5 of those games are against teams that are fading, not on the rise or in their prime.
January 10-4
- The Blazer keep on rolling as the schedule really starts to favor them
- 7 of 14 games are against playoff teams from last year.
- 8 of 14 are in Portland
- longest road trip is 4 games, (Chi, Phi, NJ, Charlotte)
- only 1 back to back.
Feburary 7-5
- 5 of 12 against playoff teams
- 7 of 12 on the road
- 2 back to backs
- They play OKC twice, the Knicks, Atlanta, the Clippers, Memphis, and Minnesota.
March 11-5
- Coming home should be fun to watch
- 10 of 16 are at the Rose Garden
- 9 of 16 are against playoff teams, but among those are Denver, Dallas and Atlanta.
- 3 back to back games
- 1 five game road trip that lasts 7 days, but has a favorable schedule,(Atlanta, Memphis, Indiana, Cleveland and Milwaukee).
April 6-2
- In the last month they face OKC twice, the Griz, the Clippers and Denver, all teams that they should beat.
- 5 of 8 are on the road
- 4 playoff teams, although one is the last game vs the Lakers at the Garden so the Blazers should pull that one out.
- I figued they would Lose @ Houston, and @ SA Spurs.
That gives the Blazers and over all record of 55-27 and would win them the division if the Jazz ended up where I predicted. So while none of this is a forgone conlusion, I think it is very possible for this team to put together a run this year, kind of like the Hornets did last year.
One last thing, in doing this I also ran and predicted every schedule for each team. I won't list them all, but how about the top 8 in each confrenece?
The West
- Hornets 57-25
- Rockets 56-26
- Lakers 56-26
- Spurs 55-27
- Blazers 55-27
- Jazz 51-31
- Suns 47-33
- Nuggets 44-38
The East
- Boston 58-24
- Pistons 52-30
- Magic 52-30
- 76ers 50-32
- Cavs 49-33
- Wizards 44-38
- Raptors 42-40
- Bulls 40-42
The biggest fall off from any team I am predicting is Dallas, I really feel Cuban destroyed his team last year. Kidd handicaps their salary cap and their spacing on the floor. Their decline at the end of last season was just the beginning. I guess the other big suprise is I have the Lakers finishing 4th in the west. Maybe I am overvalueing the Rockets, but man at some point they just have too much talent to not be better than they have shown.
10 recs |
64 comments
Comments
Wow, nice work
I agree that 55 should be the right number of wins. A first round playoff win should also happen.
by TallTimber on Sep 18, 2008 3:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nitpicky things....
1) You have the Lakers finishing 3rd not 4th in the West.
2) If the blazers win the division they will be the 4th seed, not the 5th seed.
"Jerryd is straight ahead at you. Rudy dips around. Jerryd is a rock. Rudy is the wind. Jerryd loves the ball in his hands. Rudy moves without it. Jerryd defends by getting up in your grill. Rudy plays the spaces in between. Jerryd has focused vision. Rudy sees all around him. Jerryd likes to score off of the dribble. Rudy can catch and shoot. Jerryd is aggressive. Rudy is sneaky. Jerryd will hit you hard. Rudy will annoy you until you hit him." -Dave
Word.
by joelor on Sep 18, 2008 3:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
sorry bad explaination
I was not listing the seeding for any playoffs, just what the records of the top 8 from each confrence would be. But your right about the lakers.
by usmcr3049 on Sep 18, 2008 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Got it,
and yeah, that was just a typo obviously.
"Jerryd is straight ahead at you. Rudy dips around. Jerryd is a rock. Rudy is the wind. Jerryd loves the ball in his hands. Rudy moves without it. Jerryd defends by getting up in your grill. Rudy plays the spaces in between. Jerryd has focused vision. Rudy sees all around him. Jerryd likes to score off of the dribble. Rudy can catch and shoot. Jerryd is aggressive. Rudy is sneaky. Jerryd will hit you hard. Rudy will annoy you until you hit him." -Dave
Word.
by joelor on Sep 18, 2008 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who even knows what to call that seed
The Blazers would get the ‘4th seed’, but the team with the better record would host the game, so it’s really like having the 5th seed anyway. I really don’t like that rule at all (though leaving the spot for 1 team that gets a higher win total than the other division winner is a great call)
by einman77 on Sep 18, 2008 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seeding is worthless...
winning games (in so called ‘playoff’ series is more useful)
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 18, 2008 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
seeding helps decide home court advantage
Not only does that give an edge to one of the nearly evenly matched teams in the 4 and 5 spot, but the home team fans (you and me) get to go to the games. So I’m not sure who it’s ‘worthless’ to.
by einman77 on Sep 18, 2008 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very nice work!
Man! When is the season going to get here!!
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Sep 18, 2008 4:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
that's a lot of work...
I’ll cheer you as well as the Blazers at the end of the year when you post the “see I told you” follow up.
Also, were this to come to fruition the Nate would win coach of the year.
Free Joel Freeland! (with the purchase of 1 Wafer)
by LaughingJon on Sep 18, 2008 4:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
He wanted to make sure
that no one posted “This should be in the fan post area”. :-)
Very well thought out. A+
My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.
by OCBlazerFan1 on Sep 18, 2008 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have been feeling 55 as well,
and division champs. I think that we can easily add in another 14 wins as Dal, Phx, GSW and Den should all be weaker this year, while we should be improved. Even discounting Oden and his O skills, even if he is just an upgradeed Joel, our weaknesses will be hidden as he will have at least a servicable post O game and will suck up the boards at a good, if not clip, a KEY weakness with our team last year.
As high as I am/have been on Bayless, worst case he will come in and give us at least the production of Jack given similar minutes and will add needed firepower to the 2nd unit along with Rudy who will add even that much more. Plus on the 2nd unit, due to Frye being replaced @ C with Pryz, we will get a significant upgrade on D and boards. Our 2nd team will be better than some teams 1st string and that should add about 4-5 wins in and of itself.
As for the Jazz we need to crush them as this is the last year they will have. Larry H Miller is such a tightwad and is not willing to pay to win and with
Dwill @ $13.7m
AK @ $16.4m
Okur @ $9m
Harpring @ $6.5m
in 09-10 that is $45.6m for only 4 players leaving $27m under the lux tax and including in the following guaranteed salaries:
Korver PO @ $5m,
Koufos @ $1.21m,
CJ Miles @ $3.75
09 1st @ $1-2m
and Brewers team option
Brewer TO @ $2.7,
leaving only about $13.4m for
Boozer’s PO and Milsap is a UFA and should fetch a pretty penny up from his bargain $700k salary.
So 55 is about what I am thinking, and after this year UT is screwed and we should be taking off into the stratosphere.
GOOG TIMES
The season cannot get here soon enough.
by SpyderRyder on Sep 18, 2008 4:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The article I linked in my main post
said D.Williams new contact calls for him to make $50 million in the first 3 years, which I just divided evenly to get about $16 million. Ofcourse it most likely would be a bit smaller and then get 10.5% raises each year, but i didn’t want to do the math over a few million bucks, when in reality it didn’t matter, because the Jazz still won’t have enough to pay Boozer the big bucks he is going to want.
I just wanted to address the difference in salary’s we each listed for Williams, other than that I completely agree.
by usmcr3049 on Sep 18, 2008 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is what storyteller had on
his site. Either way yo uare going to have to pick only one, Boozer or Milsap cause Boozer is gonna want $15m+ and I would guess the market for Milsap would be in the $7-9m/yr range. Let us hope that AK does not go to Russia and play for CSKA as has been reported. There have been some rumblings that he may ask the Jazz to void his contract so he can play there, but that sounds idiotic to me. If I was making $15m, $16m, $17m in the next 3 years I would not do anything to void that.
I hope he plays out his contract, and by then Boozer and/or Milsap will be gone and the jazz will be so strapped for talent they will be a crap team, not to mention when Sloan hangs it up which should be coming here in a few years.
The season cannot get here soon enough.
by SpyderRyder on Sep 18, 2008 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think this is possible if only
Portland finally grows consistent. Last season in the streak, this team could beat anyone. But being realistic, even those teams weren’t that great. The toughest teams were Utah and Denver, but we still lost to them each once or twice throughout the season.
While Portland SHOULD beat teams like OKC, Charlotte, Milwaukee, Miami, and Sacramento, they still surprised me last season by doing considerably bad or getting really close games against teams they should be beating by 20 points. If Portland can consistently beat these teams and still chip away at those top playoff teams or near playoff teams, then Portland could get to say 50 games. I don’t know about 55, but definitely 50 games.
I still think they’ll struggle in the first two months and start getting fired up by December again. They have 3 new players in the rotation, so chemistry ON the court will have to be developed.
I think for this team, it’s more against teams that they know well and know how to beat, not necessarily the record itself. Maybe I’ll make a fanpost on this. In fact, I will.
by dyshooter182 on Sep 18, 2008 6:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think they will be more consistant this year
But they will be a work in progress in that department. However for the most part when deciding on who would win a given game, I looked at the two teams, (which is better), who is at home, (if each were equal I gave the game to the home team), and if one of the teams was on a long road trip or the back end of a back to back. I think I was pretty fair, because I really believe for every “hick up” in OKC, there is a special win against the Hornets, Spurs, or even Boston in Boston. This team will suprise even some of the optimist amoung us.
by usmcr3049 on Sep 18, 2008 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Is there going to be a hurracaine in Phoenix that causes them to cancel two games?
1. Hornets 57-25
2. Rockets 56-26
3. Lakers 56-26
4. Spurs 55-27
5. Blazers 55-27
6. Jazz 51-31
7. Suns 47-33
8. Nuggets 44-38
Naw but seriously, good post. I wasn’t as crazy as you…i just did a game-by-game for the blazers, not 15 other teams. I think I came up with 47 or so….but i certainly would love to be proven wrong by your 55 prediction.
"I think that the team that wins game five will win the series. Unless we lose game five."
Who else? Charles Barkley
by prezofdeath on Sep 18, 2008 6:33 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Shaq will eat two entire games.
One of which will be at Memphis.
Mmm . . . barbecue . . .
"Mister Oden is a very, very big human being." - Jerryd Bayless
by QualityPie on Sep 18, 2008 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry that was another typo.
Some times I type stuff too fast for my own good. The 47 wins were right, but it should read 35 losses.
by usmcr3049 on Sep 18, 2008 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the way you think!
I’m bullish on this team, provided they stay relatively healthy. I hope everybody else in the league underestimates them because of their relative (or perceived) inexperience-that should be to the Blazers’ advantage. I think G.O.‘s mere presence, let alone his talent, Rudy’s obvious skills, and the spark provided by Mr. Bayless are going to really add something special to an already blossoming core from last season. From the get go, this is a classic pick-your-poison kind of team, and I think the Northwest Division title is coming to the Northwest, where it rightfully belongs.
by Modal Rounder on Sep 18, 2008 8:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The bastardizing of the term "Northwest"
In the traditonal sense, Chicago was in the Northwest. But as the world stands today, Portland is the only Northwest team in the Northwest division. I would be surprised if Portland doesn’t have the best record in the Northwest Division in 4 out of the next 5 year.
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 18, 2008 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is the homerest thing I've seen all day
and I agree with every word of it
by 50backflips on Sep 18, 2008 9:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
in Portland, homerism is a sign of intelligence, not hubris
by Bust a Bucket on Sep 18, 2008 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
haahahahahaha
I love blazersedge
by dyshooter182 on Sep 18, 2008 10:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But my question to you is
after you read it, did you do 50 backflips?
by usmcr3049 on Sep 18, 2008 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice
This balances the current main page post.
—Dave
by Dave on Sep 18, 2008 11:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Half right, half wrong
I think you are right on about 55 wins. I’ve been saying that for several months.
I think you are wrong about the Jazz. Your comments boil down to this — this is effectively a contract year for Boozer and Okur. If they have big years, they opt out for more money. Lots of incentive, they are likely to come ready for a big time year.
The Jazz will be very tough this year. Maybe for the last time, but very, very tough this year.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Sep 19, 2008 1:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah,
I didn’t follow the reasoning that their potentially being in the last year of their contracts equating to the team struggling. It’s almost always the opposite
Free Joel Freeland! (with the purchase of 1 Wafer)
by LaughingJon on Sep 19, 2008 6:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see that side of the arguement
I just don’t agree. Yes they could have better than avg years because they are in their contract years, however most of those years are from players like Okur, a fringe roleplayer who needs his next contract to be good. Boozer is an All-star, a Superstar, (at least in his mind) his ego tells him he is being disrespected by the Jazz because they won’t extend him. How many players of Boozers stature go to restricted free agency? This summer was extremely suprising because of Elton Brand and Baron Davis doing it, but even those two are just a step down the ladder from Boozer, he as a freaking Olympian!
My point is, I feel that Boozer and his agent, who have been talking with the jazz all summer, will continue to talk to them during the season, and it might even get ugly in the press, as the Jazz owner has already taken it there.
It may go as you see, and I don’t think the Jazz will role over, but I can definately see them slipping just a bit, especially in the playoffs.
by usmcr3049 on Sep 19, 2008 7:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for all your hard work
You’re selling the Blazers short. If the Blazers don’t win 60+ games, I will castrate my pets.
The Josh abides.
by tominhawaii on Sep 19, 2008 3:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You have female pets?
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Sep 19, 2008 6:44 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A dog and a cat
I already got them fixed though. I did it for Bob Barker.
The Josh abides.
by tominhawaii on Sep 19, 2008 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have you read the latest from Bob Barker?
What am I going to do with all these dog uteruses?
"Jerryd is straight ahead at you. Rudy dips around. Jerryd is a rock. Rudy is the wind. Jerryd loves the ball in his hands. Rudy moves without it. Jerryd defends by getting up in your grill. Rudy plays the spaces in between. Jerryd has focused vision. Rudy sees all around him. Jerryd likes to score off of the dribble. Rudy can catch and shoot. Jerryd is aggressive. Rudy is sneaky. Jerryd will hit you hard. Rudy will annoy you until you hit him." -Dave
Word.
by joelor on Sep 22, 2008 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
dude ... I cracked up over that all day Friday.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Sep 22, 2008 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I bet he could sell them to a restaurant.
Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision
by tominhawaii on Sep 22, 2008 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
b-b-bbbbbbb-arfffff!
BARF!
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Sep 22, 2008 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
“I guess it’s like any other hobby: You start making model airplanes, then you have to build a special shelf to store them, then they start filling a bookcase, and before you know it, you’ve got a bloody, sopping-wet heap of dog uteruses in the trunk of your car.”
"Jerryd is straight ahead at you. Rudy dips around. Jerryd is a rock. Rudy is the wind. Jerryd loves the ball in his hands. Rudy moves without it. Jerryd defends by getting up in your grill. Rudy plays the spaces in between. Jerryd has focused vision. Rudy sees all around him. Jerryd likes to score off of the dribble. Rudy can catch and shoot. Jerryd is aggressive. Rudy is sneaky. Jerryd will hit you hard. Rudy will annoy you until you hit him." -Dave
Word.
by joelor on Sep 22, 2008 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My Grandma
Had special shelf’s build for her grave boat collection.
Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision
by tominhawaii on Sep 22, 2008 2:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gravy boat? or weird Norseman grandma?
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Sep 23, 2008 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dang
I had a lot of typo’s yesterday.
Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision
by tominhawaii on Sep 23, 2008 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shoot.
I was kinda hoping for the Viking Gramma.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Sep 23, 2008 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Better than my other typo
Apparently I have “poop tails” on my long sleeve shirts.
Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision
by tominhawaii on Sep 23, 2008 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Much much worse than horn-helmet granny. Much worse.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Sep 23, 2008 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
unconvinced
Impressive fan-post very well done earns an E for Effort. That, being said, anyone not wearing rose-red colored lenses in their thick black frames might suggest such speculation is unwarranted.
Certainly, the cause be optimistic is valid. The PTB have cautiously yet daringly assembled a tremendous pool of talent, which have given fans reason for hope. I dont blame anybody for that.
But the veracity of your argument can only be judged after we have seen the team play together and produce wins. Will Oden be as awsome as we hope? Will Rudy, Bayless, and Web incorporate themselves into the seams? Can all the new talent playing together for the first time mix in successfully with coach’s gameplan? Can Nate keep everybody happy?
Alot of I don’t know’s and it looks good on paper. I’ll believe it when I see it for fear of being let down later.
"Sure its been a v e r y long summer and I have fleas too. Quit complaining."--- My cat- Bonzi responding to the anticipation by fans of next years team.
by bow4meow on Sep 19, 2008 8:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
High expectations
I like it,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Alot
by Dragonage on Sep 19, 2008 10:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm going
Cautiously optimistic on this one. Its a very well researched post, but I just don’t believe 2 parts of it. The first is that it’ll take 48 wins merely to get the 8th seed in the West. It’ll be good, but I don’t think it’ll be 48 wins good.
And I’m just not sure if the Blazers can reach 55 wins. I think 10-8 in the first month is a crazy huge stretch, merely because it is a relatively new team. Three brand new players, and then add in new-to-the-floor GO, and we’ve got to take some time to get the chemistry of everyone figured out.
by usdblazerfan on Sep 19, 2008 11:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well done
I think it’ll be closer between the Blazers and Jazz than you say, but whether I agree or not I have to respect the amount of work you did. Thanks so much for backing up everything you wrote and explaining your thought process.
< /war >
by Diesel10 on Sep 19, 2008 12:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
55 wins again.
I called 55 wins several month’s ago and
injuries are the only thing that can mess up
the finish.
Smooth will be an All-Star
Rudy & JRex will add scoring, athleticism
and desire.
3M will break out with the new handle, “D” and
consistant shooting.
Joel/Buffet/Ike/TO/Rudy/JRex will be the
best “White” unit in the league. . . and
GO will be a MONSTER – think young Shaq
with more shooting touch from the field & the Line.
TOO BIG & STRONG FOR MOST CENTERS &
TOO QUICK FOR THE REST !
IT’S ALMOST GO TIME !!!
COINCAST NEEDS TO DO A DEAL !
BRING BACK OUR BLAZERS TO SO. OREGON !!
It's GO time !
by walkoff41 on Sep 19, 2008 2:56 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
maybe I'm wrong...
but I can’t help thinking we are too young not to blow a few more games that should be easy wins…
"Great Oden's raven" - Ron Burgandy
by danevan on Sep 19, 2008 6:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
You’re counting on the season to play out in a sensible way, this is the nba and nothing really happens exactly to plan. I just feel there should be a few games knocked off for injurys, upsets and other unforseen neusances.
The difference between a veteran team and a young team is a veteran team is more likely to have the season play out sensibly like your talking about, a young team is prone to go astray.
Fantastic post though, i appreciate your work and pray that your right and i’m wrong.
by Croatian_Sensation on Sep 19, 2008 7:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh, you're right
If we knock off a few games for injuries, upsets, and other unforeseen nuisances, then instead of 55 wins, we should get 58, right?
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Sep 20, 2008 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Further points to support your excellent work
The Blazers last year had the best record (11-5) within the division without the newbees.
Portland against Denver: 2-2
Portland against Utah: 3-1
Portland against Seattle: 2-2
Portland against Minnesota: 4-0
Also of the only teams that swept us last year:
Spurs 0-4
Rockets 0-4
Suns 0-3
Celtics 0-2
Bobcats 0-2
Pacers 0-2
Cavaliers 0-2
Magic 0-2
Only the Rockets, Hornets and LAL got significantly better over the off-season. The Jazz did not. The Nuggets lost their best rebounder, low defender and shot blocker. Minnesota got better but not enough to notice. Seattle OKC added a rookie who has not played point guard before.
Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."
by lee3022 on Sep 21, 2008 2:19 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
It's a nice thought.
But I think you’re being significantly homer toward the Blazers and very unrealistic toward the Jazz. They are good, and they are battle tested. And neither are they dealing with all the rumors that they dealt with last off season. They’ll come out ready to go, and I doubt they’ll start the season treading water like they did last year. And yes, contract years in the NBA usually = big years, so watch out for Boozer/Okur/Millsap. I simply don’t understand the logic in thinking they’ll have an off year.
On our side, we’ve got Brandon and Channing coming off surgeries, and Greg still recovering from microfracture. But even more than that, we just have so many good players on our team that it’s going to take awhile for Nate to establish the pecking order and figure out a rotation that works. I just don’t think the start of the season will be what we want. That’s a brutal schedule in November.
It should be a fun season, though. There are just so many teams out of the gate looking like they can compete for the playoffs. Should be interesting watching it all play out.
"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez
by bfan on Sep 21, 2008 11:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Also
the Jazz will have a full season with Korver in the mix.
by Samuelson on Sep 21, 2008 2:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
And you are taking Larry H. Miller's comment out of context.
He said that he didn’t see them being a luxury tax team, but that comment had nothing to do with Boozer directly. No one asked, “will you offer Boozer a max contract?” and then LHM said, “we won’t go in the luxury tax.” He was just rambling about stuff after he got out of the hospital. The Jazz will ultimately have to decide if they want Boozer around for the money he asks. If they want to offer him the money he requests, they can make it work. They have Kirilenko and Harpring who can either be traded or have unguaranteed contracts. But every Jazz fan knows that either AK or Boozer won’t be on this team next season.
The more you try to erase me, the more that I appear.
by clarkpojo on Sep 22, 2008 8:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















