Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The 2009-2010 Card Chronicle Big East basketball preview

9/11 Twin Towers Junk Drawer

I know you can't put lipstick on a pig, but I'm a veteran and I'm going to take that as free license to put up a post (with a controversial name) on how excited I am about seeing a lineup with Greg Oden and LaMarcus Aldridge. Seriously, the Blazers are going to be ridiculously good, right?

I would probably even be excited by LMA and Channing Frye as our twin towers but instead we're faced with an even greater possibility.

I'm taking up words at this point but I want to see what is up with the Junk Drawer today and I need the recs.

 

 

3 recs  |  Comment 312 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Another reason why I hate what happened on 9/11: The great term "twin towers" now evokes bad memories

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 11, 2008 3:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

OT follow-up: Help me understand this Bill Gates - Jerry Seinfeld commercial

Dave recently had a fanpost about two commercials he didn’t fully understand:
http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/8/19/597344/ot-help-me-understand-comm

Now here is one I don’t understand: The new Microsoft ad (campaign) around Jerry Seinfeld. Microsoft has a lot of problems with their latest operating system Vista, basically they admitted themselves it blows in another marketing campaign (http://www.mojaveexperiment.com). Now this is somehow supposed to be designed to counter the pretty aggressive yet very funny ads Apple makes around two actors playing a Mac and a PC (http://www.apple.com/getamac/ads). But I just don’t get it. And neither do the experts. http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2008/09/05/first-gates-seinfeld-ad-leaves-us-scratching-our-heads

Here is the first one on Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afR5J7eskno
The add is even on Microsoft’s Windows frontpage (high quality, Silverlight required): http://www.microsoft.com/windows/
In the ArsTechnica article are two more links to stream or download it.

Reportedly Seinfeld gets $10 million for this campaign. And the funny thing is: He’s an Apple guy. A Powerbook was seen in his appartment in “Seinfeld” all the time, and he appeared in a “Think different – here is to the crazy ones” spot. He uses their products in his private life (or used to). Now he has sold out to the dark side. But for what?

I know there are a lot of non-tech guys around here. I’m especially hoping for you to make some sense of this. What’s going on in this spot? Does this make you want to buy a Microsoft product (especially Windows)? I think I see a few allusions to the market situation around computer operating systems, but it’s so hidden or badly executed that it doesn’t make much sense. Is that spot just designed to create attention with two prominent people and become some viral thing? Is Bill the testimonial? Is it a campaign about nothing just like Seinfeld was a show about nothing? I don’t get it.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 11, 2008 5:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Dark side-nice

It makes no sense, it’s not funny, they even have two different cuts of it that seem to strangle each other plot-wise, but I think it hurts Bill Gates’s image more than Windows. Really the only thing you can take away from it is that Bill Gates is such a rich prick that he pays huge sums of money to get extremely famous and revered celebrities (like the guy from the biggest show ever) to wait on him hand and foot for the stupidest of reasons. On top of that, the guy is so cheap that despite being the richest guy alive he refuses to pay more than bargain basement prices. And THEN, he closes the commercial by shaking his ass at the camera, and thus, everyone watching HIS commercial. So much for him being a humanitarian.

by 0004248939 on Sep 11, 2008 5:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

When...

the gerbil took over Microsoft in “Pinky & the Brain” it was called “Microsponge,” now, frankly, I can see why.

by 0004248939 on Sep 11, 2008 5:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I actually turned down that offer for 10 million, they wanted me to start using mac

and I said NO! I love my system crashing on me in the middle of writing a lengthy BEdge post!

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Simple.

It’s trying to accomplish two things: Make Microsoft warm and fuzzy, and encourage people to lower their expectations about Vista. An OS, dear Consumer, is like a shoe that everyone needs to bend or soak in water to make fit. So quit complaining! Vista is teh awsum!

It’s an awful spot. And Seinfield? His spotlight faded, what, 10 years ago?Too bad for Microsoft that the best PC pitchman is John Hodgman.

by grimc on Sep 11, 2008 8:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why did Seinfield go to the dark side?

$10 million will make a lot of people do a lot of things

by tingeyga on Sep 11, 2008 8:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, do not include me on the list.

Nobody is going to offer that money to me.

The Midnight Rambler

by amlmart1 on Sep 11, 2008 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In answer to your question ...

…Now he has sold out to the dark side. But for what?"

I’d say for $10 million dollars.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Warning - "advertising speak" in this reply...

As someone who is currently employed by a pretty big agency, let me point out a few things. That one ad is not the campaign. They are reportedly planning to spend $300 million on this campaign. As an aside, my preference would be they spend $300 million on a new, clean, slim version of Windows that actually works well, but they didn’t ask me.

This is just the teeny, tiny tip of the huge-ass iceberg. This initial commercial is supposed to get people to pay attention. As much as it doesn not impress me, you can call it “mission accomplished” in that people are talking about it….heck, we’re even discussing it in a Blazers blog/forum. And this is not the only place….it’s being discussed in a lot of places where it’s not relevant to the topic.

In the week it’s been on Youtube, it’s garnered almost 700,000 views. That doesn’t count the other online locations. The number of non-paid views is HUGE.

There are undoubtedly a whole series of ads ready to roll, on a predefined schedule. And if the agency that did them (Crispin, Porter +Bogusky – probably the hottest shop creatively in the industry at the moment) comes even remotely close to achieving what they’ve done with other high profile campaigns, this one too will end up being pretty successful.

For example, they are the people behind the Burger King ads (the big-headed king). Like them or not, they have had a profound impact on their sales and they are a hit with their target market.

Personally, I hope they fail here, because the folks at Crispin Porter tend to be even more arrogant that the folks as Microsoft.

by antediluvian on Sep 11, 2008 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the perspective

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks too

I knew it was just the first spot of many, still it didn’t strike me as very useful other than having some viral touch to it to get people in the tech world and elsewhere talking (though maybe not about how great Windows is). Any yeah, I know a few of the good folks of CP+B.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 12, 2008 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I too am completely stoked to see how LaMarcus and GO work together, how GO frees up LaMarcus.

Will La Marcus absolutely feed on the second-chance kickouts GO is likely to be tossing around?
Will the threat of being posterized (first time I’ve ever used that term) by GO have defenders leaving LaMarcus wide open?
Twin Towers indeed!

(It’s now 8:46, 9/11 here in Manhattan. the time it went down 7 years ago. Some people here are pretty bummed out. But really, what can you do? What’s done is done. Confusion about the meaning of Sept. 11, aside from the obvious loss of life, continues to prevail. With all due respect for your military service, BlazerD, I don’t see what 9/11 has to do with the U.S. military. Civilians and civilians alone were attacked that day — aside from the Pentagon office workers. The military response was, for the most part, a disastrous blunder.)

Much love and respect,
-Mat
NYC

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 5:49 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Military response

The British lost 60,000 casualties on the first day of the Somme. In historical terms, military action since 9/11 can hardly be called disastrous. Two apparently hostile regimes have been removed from power with minimal casualties compared to any real war.

Whether it was a blunder or appropriate is quite another question. But to call it disastrous is to redefine disastrous disastrously, and to insult the excellence and professionalism of the military of the U.S., U.K., Australia, and a few others. And 9/11 has a tremendous amount to do with the military, because it caused them to be sent into action, many have had to spend time away from family and friends, and some have been injured and lost their lives.

I actually can’t believe that no Americans replied to this. I left it for a while, since you talked about the U.S. military, but it is relevant to all of us. Whatever one’s political view of the decisions made by the U.S. administration, one should keep certain things in perspective. It had everything to do with the military, and in large part, their performance has been phenomenal.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Perspective, my friend.

Without stepping on too many toes, or at least trying not to, I would urge perspective when thinking about the response to the attacks of that day.
Cause and effect are tricky things.
I cast a stone into a lake, causing a splash. The effect is ripples in the water. The lake does not stop and think, should I ripple or not. It just ripples. the lake is unthinking.
Some nutjob fanatics fly planes into buildings in Manhattan and WDC, causing the deaths of thousands. Was the effect a thinking, rational reaction, or a reflex response? Or worse, a half-thought out distraction (blunder) with disastrous results for the U.S. (further loss of life, both American and otherwise, military and civilian, …).

The performance of these military actions has, for the most part, been rather amazing. The overall global strategy, a disastrous blunder.

Anyone not totally cracked (psychotic and totally put over the edge) by war will tell you war should be avoided at all cost, according to my personal research. Horror upon horror. Still, you don’t want nutjobs flying planes into your buildings. So the nutjob training ground was heroically shut down (the good fight) and a new nutjob training ground was opened up (the bad fight). Cause and effect. Tricky things.

Again, I don’t mean to step on anyone’s toes. I have nothing but respect for people who put their life and their family’s safety in harm’s way for causes they believe in. But belief in causes is a very tricky thing.

Peace.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My objection

is not that you oppose the decision to go to war. I’m rather unsure about the whole thing.

My objection is the statement that it has nothing to do with the military, when it has had everything to do with the military (see Andy’s comment just below and tell me it has nothing to do with the military), and characterizing the military response as disastrous.

The decision to send in the military may have been poor, but the response of the military has been phenomenal.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 12:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure I agree

Each individual soldier did their best, I’m sure of that.

Reports of torture (see below) and Mai Lai (spelling)-type massacres have me wondering if war, and to a lesser degree military service in general, doesn’t just take good kind hearted people and make then bad, or at least temporarily numb, mixed up, and hurt.

9/11, on the other hand, has to do with people going to work and getting blown up. Kids saying goodbye to their parents who just went into the office, not to war.

No one woke up that morning thinking they were a soldier in a war or part of some military actions (aside perhaps the nutjobs that flew those planes). For me, at least, 9/11 is about civilian people, not flags and ranks and military action and honor and service and duty and all that. It’s about Average Joe who may or may not love his country and jesus and apple pie, but is a person nonetheless.

Those were the victims of 9/11. Not soldiers. The soldiers are a victim of a different calamity.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Well said

I knew quite a lot of people who died that day. One in the planes, the others in the twin towers. In fact, the company lost more people than any other. (http://memorial.mmc.com/) It hurts, and while their friends and family may hate the attackers and those who sent them I doubt more than a few would want other people to be killed as a revenge, especially civilians.

I’m not a politician. I’m not a soldier (I did serve, but in a rehab hospital). And I didn’t want to get into politics today. But what makes me especially angry is how the aftermath was handled by the administration. While I can understand why a war was waged against the Taliban (and that not decisive enough) I never understood what Iraq was supposed to have to do with it. None of the attackers was Iraqi. None of them was trained in Iraq. And Sadam was a lot of things, but not a religious fanatic. In fact, that war destroyed a historical chance to take united actions against global terrorism, cause in contrast to the first Gulf War it instantly alienated almost all allies. On 9/11, everybody was American. Most governments and people on the world felt like they were under attack, too. They wanted to help. They would have supported preventive measures, education, financial aid, maybe targeted captures and killings of terrorist leaders. But not that war.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 11, 2008 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Isn't this like saying

that an accident has nothing to do with the doctor in the hospital who treats the victims? It was inevitable (whether it should have happened or not, it was inevitable) that there would be a military response of some kind. 9/11 changed the lives of our military men, so to say it didn’t have anything to do with them is pretty uncharitable, actually.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK

I’m willing to accept that. This is the statement that rang my bell.

“With all due respect for your military service, BlazerD, I don’t see what 9/11 has to do with the U.S. military.”

Perhaps you can see why I’ve taken it the way I have. It appears that you are saying it has nothing to do with the military, where it obviously has had a lot to do with them.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right,

but what I meant was, this is not Veterans Day, a day to honor Vets. This is 9/11, when I get up, get some coffee, go into work and think about what it would be like to just get blown up, or worse, find out my wife or mom or dad was just blown up while doing the same thing.
That’s all I’m saying.
it’s a bummer.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

I can agree with that. But when a vet sees it as being relevant to him, it just seems a) unbalanced and b) uncool to disagree.

Look, it hit everybody. Every single one of us.

It hit the people who died and their families and friends the hardest.

Next, probably, was the people who had to respond, fire, police, medical.

Arguably, it hit the military next.

It impacted their lives a lot more than the average American and Brit.

We all were impacted, we all have something to say. But those groups (family, friends, responders, military) arguably have even more right to talk about it.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hard for me to speak from or to their position.

I can only really get what’s in my head. Even that’s a little murky most times, I’ll admit.
Vets, cops, firefighters, they do a tough job, that’s for sure, but we’re all just people.
I’m not trying to start another fight here, but consider this: School teachers probably deserve a lot more respect than they get. Preachers and politicians a lot less. A soldier’s job is to kill. How good is that? Reasons, reasons, set and setting are everything, I know, … historical perspective, arguments … Sparta, strike first …

I met a man once who had devoted his life to helping children of ethnic minorities in Myanmar escape before the ruling junta killed them. He didn’t ask anyone for a dime. He was a true rebel with a cause. He would acquire fake Thai passports for these kids, sneak into the country, and bring the kids out. He was wanted in Somalia for similar activities.
There was a hero.

Love.
I’m done for the night. Quitting time in NYC. I made it through without getting blown up.
Go Blazers

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have you considered asking yourself this -

Why is it you are “bumming” about the possibility that you or someone you know might be killed in a terrorist act? Have you given any thought to probability of risk? There is a chance that you or someone you know might step off the curb today and get hit by a bus. The odds of that happening are about the same, possibily greater. The odds are certainly greater that you could be killed or injured in a car accident. Or drown. Or a host of other hazards.

For all intent and purposes, you have created your own state of fear. I am at a loss to understand what is accomplished with this sort of thinking. If there is one undeniable truth, it is that all of us come into this world with a death sentence. We all gonna die. You, me, jscot (well, maybe not jscot – he might have a secret plan), but everybody else we know. On days like today I don’t spend time thinking about the people that died, other than to say a prayer for their souls. I think about the people still living, the family and friends who go on living.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hear you man. It’s one of those things that, once you think about it, it’s pretty silly.
I wasn’t really bummed out. Like everything else, it’s just a state of mind.
It’s also the off-season for another 40 days or so …

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hear you there.

I’ll be happy for even pre-season to start, so we have something Blazer related to talk about. Right now there really is nothing. Hence indulging in talk of politics, religion and sex.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This illustrates a rather limited and shallow understanding

of war, human nature, international affairs, history, etc.

“Anyone will tell you war should be avoided at all cost” – only fools who have never been threatened, attacked or oppressed will tell you this. What people who have fought will tell you is that war should be avoided, if possible. Meaning if there are other reasonable means to accomplish your objective, they should be tried. That isn’t even close to saying “at all cost”.

Some nutjob fanatics" – fanatics most certainly. Nutjobs? I guess that depends on your definition of the term. It’s not one I’d use to describe the men who committed those acts. Were they truly nutjobs, they would never have been able to carry it off.

“Cause and effect are tricky things” – ok? Just what is your point? That the “effect” of the airliners being crashed into US targets was the result of some cause that the US was responsible for? That’s a nice theory. Care to prove it?

“Was the effect a thinking, rational reaction” – Very much so. If we are to accept your premise that Bin Laden and his followers are nutjobs, then by definition any action they take is likely to be unthinking and irrational. I doubt any of the people looking for Bin Laden or dealing with violent non-governmental organizations believe that their opponents are irrational or can’t think.

“The overall global strategy, a disastrous blunder” – another definitive statement. On what basis do you make this claim? There have been no further attacks on the US. Non-fundamental pro-Western governments has been established in Iraq and Afghanistan. By all accounts the non-secterian violence is diminishing in Iraq. Libya has renounced their nuclear and state sponsered terrorism programs and is trying to rejoin the rest of the civilized world. Assuming you actually understand exactly what our global strategy is (I’d only be willing to take a somewhat educated guess at it), where has it failed? Have you considered the possibility that the timeframe for determining the successful (or not) outcome of a strategy might be in terms of decades?

“But belief in causes is a very tricky thing” – perhaps. If you lack things like faith, conviction, sense of purpose, belief in something greater than yourself.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I lack the faith, conviction and sense of purpose to believe in a lot of things.

Once you stop questioning, you stop thinking.

(by the way, I never meant to imply I thought the US was directly responsible for the 9/11 attacks. The jury is still out, and I’m not a juror.
Also, regarding thinking and non-thinking action, I meant that lashing out was an unthinking action, like a child. A measured response is more rational — meaning choosing ones battles.
Regarding your assertion that the post-9/11 reaction was the correct, or at least a good course, to prevent further attacks, I think punching everyone in the room is a good way to get what you want, but the other people in the room might not like you much.
Nutjob is a subjective term. Love it or leave it.
Regarding going to war, “at all costs” should be read as different from avoiding battle. I react to threats, attacks and oppression with a very quick and willful “don’t tread on my” attitude often. But this is not war. War is something groups of people plan out and carry out on a massive scale. You can’t war on an idea. You can battle it. These are hard concepts to explain and understand.)

In closing: Love is a battlefield.

Best wishes.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Love is Battlefield, Oh I am so glad someone threw some humor into this post

if you could hear my singing that song in my head, you would dance with me, who sang it? I need it on my IPOD for my daily BEdge walk down should-of/should-not-of have done memory lane.

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it was Pat Benatar … or was it Survivor? Not that was “bang’n on the walls of heartache, Bang Bang … I am the Warrior.”

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Love is a battlefield=Pat Benetar

bang’n on the walls of heartache, Bang Bang … I am the Warrior."=Patti Smythe

Survivor= Eye of the Tiger

Styx -"I'm schizophrenic....and so am I"

by 92wastheyear on Sep 11, 2008 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If love is a battlefield

then I’m so glad I surrendered to the enemy.

The torture of repeated sex is extremely challenging, but I’m taking it like a man.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope this is not from personal experience!

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Noooo.

The Midnight Rambler

by amlmart1 on Sep 11, 2008 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wrong on all accounts

Pretty myopic view you have— 100K+ civilians killed is disasterous by ANY definition. War doesn’t just include the folks in uniforms. And 9/11 didn’t cause anyone to be sent to Iraq— Afghanistan, yeah— but 9/11 had nothing to do with the invasion of Iraq except as a conveniently sloppy excuse. And the performance of the military has been scarred by torture, overzealous commanders with little understanding of their surroundings, poor planning and lack of any exit strategy. The military is built to win wars— not maintian an occupation. Our military won the war quickly with Iraq in the spring of 2003. The occupation has been a disaster. Read Thomas Ricks’ Fiasco for an education.

And Jerry Seinfeld hasn’t been funny in years.

by stax o' wax on Sep 11, 2008 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

History will be a way better judge of America in Iraq

than those currently opposed to — as well as those who support — the president, his party, and his decisions.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Ask my friend Tyson Marrick what effect 9/11 had on the military and in his life

I just saw the guy last week after about 9 years of neglected friendship. He’s in bad shape. He went into the militray my junior or senior year for 4 year run. This was 1999. He was a star football player and basketball star, played baseball and still had time to hang out and go biking. He has since gained a hundred pounds of pure alchohol weight and went from not smoking to 2 packs of cig’s per day. I blame this on the military because, in his own words, those were the only 2 things to do over there in between normal routines and the occasional death of a friend. Occasionally he had to kill someone, and he said it like it wasn’t a big deal. Here was a country boy who wouldn’t hurt a ground squirrel talking about killing a man and not even blinking. Me friend died long ago.

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 11:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very sad, and sadly, very common.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The worst part is he admitted

that he will often spend entire days sitting at this one stool at the local bar in Dufur. ENTIRE DAYS. He said he will get up at 6 am and crack a budweiser. He also has been trying to man up and handle a fif of liquor everynight, trying to talk to him about sobriety was like talking to a wall, so I got drunk with him and we tried to remember all the good times we used to have doing things like shooting BB guns at pop cans and hiking up the dried creek beds. Then his younger brothers came for a beer, (6-6 330 pounder), wowzer’s i thought, maybe alchohol is fueling these giants?

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I had a Iraq vet tell me about killing people.

He had shot three. One was innocent of anything but running a light. He said it didn’t bother him, but I could tell it did.
He got drunk and told me about murdering a man in the Bahamas one time when he was a teen. Stabbed him to death. He tried to justify that too.
A sad, angry person who was planning on making the military his home forever. He said something haunting just before he left to go back to Iraq about how, once you’re in and have changed your mindset to kill, it can’t be turned off. The outside world was no longer a comfortable place.
I wonder what he’s up to now. Do I wish him well?
tough stuff to ponder.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So Andy, are we to believe that you friend

is typical of most of the men and women in the military? I can’t say it fits with any of the people I know who have served or are serving. And besides myself, that includes a rather large number of folks.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tim, Not typical by any means but strong men like yourself are our saving grace

It seems most young men my age aren’t adept enough to ward off the drugs and distractions that keep them from confronting their true emotions and memories of these horrible conflicts the U.S. is involved with. How did you time in the military affect you for the negative/positive? I am sure it helped you grow more mature but also taught you a few lesson’s about life that you might not have been ready to learn. I can’t really speak for my friend but I can tell you he was such a different person AFTER he came out of the military compared to when he went into it. I am sure most soldiers are not this dramatically affected but I believe the fact that he was 18 and never even been out of a town with 600 people before caused him to react differently then someone who had seen how ugly life can be in a big city.

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps your are wrong here: "I am sure most soldiers are not this dramatically affected..."

I´ve heard that more Vietnam vets commited suicide than soldiers died in the War (58,209). Not sure, but there are some interesting links1 2 3
War is a terrible experience you will never forget. Many people are heavily marked by traumas much lighter. And it´s not a story from the past but the present.

The Midnight Rambler

by amlmart1 on Sep 11, 2008 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's pretty flimsy evidence

to base a claim that more Vietnam vets have died from suicide than were killed in the war.

Take a look at suicide rates among active duty personnel and compare them to the US population as a whole. Rates are about the same as for the US as a whole (19 per 100,000). Rates for men are far higher than for women. So even if military suicides surpass the 19 per 100,000 rate, they won’t necessarily be higher than for men as a subset.

Some 2.4 million US troops served in Vietnam. Using the national rate of suicide, you can assume that about 4,500 of them might commit suicide – per year. As it’s been about 35 years since the end of the war, you could possibly figure that nearly 160,000 former Vietnam vets have killed themselves. That would give you the number referenced in the links.

The problem with this is there is nothing that links participation in the war with the number of suicides, let alone any evidence that the war was at minimum a contributing reason. From a probability standpoint, the same number of men would have killed themselves whether or not they ever served in Vietnam.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/09/09/army.suicides/index.html

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

.............. And between 1 and 2 million Vietnamese died in their civil war, but we never mention them...
Some 2.4 million US troops served in Vietnam.

"TominHawaii's real name is Hubert and he's a rancher in Burns."

by timbo on Sep 11, 2008 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I respect your question and will answer from personal experience

I served in Vietnam. I am 100% service-connect-disabled from that service. The war was the most wrong-managed war in our history with civilians in Washington dictating the targets. Many of our service men were draftees who were poorly supervised and discouraged by the seemingly idiotic failure to have any sort of cohesive objectives.

Even with these factors, I personally have experienced my largest trials with the response from my country back home. I have discussed with briefly with a number of fellow Vietnam veterans (I say briefly because few of us ever felt we could talk about it even to each other). Every one has noted the same phenomenon. The attitude that we were all baby-killers was astonishing. For the record I never killed any babies (but saw the enemy do so) nor saw or heard any such thing from my fellow combatants. The American public turned on us as disgusting. My fellow workers made frequent sarcastic remarks to my face when I returned to civilian life. The suicide rate is high among Vietnam veterans. Thousands still live as homeless nomads. Read some of the studies of these homeless and see that they simply do not want anything to do with the government. There is a sense of betrayal that we all feel toward our leaders and especially those who lied to the American public about us. This is as true today as it was then.

Frankly I recognize that outing myself here causes many to either dismiss my thoughts as being as misguided as my patriotism or become angry at my failure to stay quiet. I was quiet for decades. But I see the greater enemy of world-wide safety and freedom to be from those who do not remember their history and somehow believe that “give freedom a chance” was original with their generation. It was not. Hitler consolidated nearly all of Europe because of such thinking. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor to eliminate our battleship strength and to buttress the isolationism they read about predominate in the USA at the time. That same thinking apparently was part of the September 11 attacks on the USA by Al Qaeda. I see that being quiet while a new generation of defenders are pilloried is even more a betrayal by me than the purveyors of these attacks are of the national interest.

I welcome your response (and any others). Only by being willing to debate these misperceptions are we able to gain perspective from each other.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you

Except I think the current ill advised Imperial war of conquest is every bit as poorly managed as the last.

by southern oregon on Sep 11, 2008 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe not on the military side

Watching nearly every waking minute on CNN and Foxnews the embedded reporters gave an entirely different picture of this conflict from the politicians 3 years later.

Our military was so efficient and effective it scared the whole world – including us!

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gee, I don't suppose that "in bedded" reporters were naturally biased towards the military now, were they?

……………………. That was a masterpiece of military propaganda: make the “journalists” beholden to specific military units. It made ’em “team players” real fast.

Meanwhile, the BIG QUESTIONS about whether Bush’s War was actually necessary were never asked…

"TominHawaii's real name is Hubert and he's a rancher in Burns."

by timbo on Sep 11, 2008 9:38 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yep.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Sep 11, 2008 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it was a masterpiece of openness

but they were free to leave their units and return home at any time so the “beholden” thing was specious. But your comment’s clear emotion and disrespect for another’s perspective does little to advance your viewpoint.

I remember one story originating from New York was that the military was so short of food that soldiers received only two meals a day. Two different reporters from two different networks reported that there were only two meals a day issued but that reported that each meal is 1500 calories so 3000 calories issued is more than any soldier there could eat. One reporter stated that troops had no shortage of food and he himself ate only about half of the daily rations with anybody hungry easily able to score more from his neighbor.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 11:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about the story

from the guys that are there that they never get a full load out of ordinance because Halliburtion who gets huge bucks to deliver it takes a 10% black market vig off the top.I heard this from guys who have been there,not from a NY reporter

by southern oregon on Sep 11, 2008 11:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently the reporter who was with them forgot to mention this

Of course who needed ordinance? The Air Force seemed to deliver most of it. (Just kidding). Did any casualties result from being short of ordinance?

My addiction cost me greatly but I could not turn it off. I listened every day to the daily news questioning done in Kuwait. There were some tough questions but these guys came up with video evidence over and over (the next night) that showed how wrong the rumor was. The news briefing included Al Jazeera and about 300 reporters from around the world and included about an hour of questions. The brigadier that did most of the briefings was very impressive (and did not work for Halliburton). They did open with the actual issues they were having and seemed pretty complete including screw-ups.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 12, 2008 12:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That sounds like rumor.

There could be myrid reasons for not getting a full resupply, the biggest being that military supply on the scale of the Iraq invasion is an extremely complex operation. Soldiers bitch and complain (unlike sailors) and when something doesn’t work like it should, they come up with their own reasons why. What evidence did they offer up?

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 12, 2008 7:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I tend to believe

People I personally know more than PR specialist officers and sailors can out bitch soldiers any day

by southern oregon on Sep 12, 2008 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only 3,000 calories a day?

I used to eat 5,000-6,000 a day for years. I’d have starved on 3,000, and I was in college, not combat.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 12, 2008 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You must have a really high metabolism

I am told most people in the US eat less than 3000 calories per day. Wikipedia reports:

Generally, a healthy diet is said to include:

   1. Sufficient calories to maintain a person’s metabolic and activity needs, but not so excessive as to result in fat storage greater than roughly 30% of body mass. For most people the recommended daily allowance of energy is 2,000 calories, but it depends on age, sex, height, weight, and physical activity. (see Body fat percentage)

One reporter interviewed several soldiers in his unit on camera and all said they had much more than enough to eat.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 12, 2008 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Used to have a high metabolic rate

Now I gain weight if I so much as look at a donut.

I wasn’t even that big an eater compared to guys I knew who played sports in high school. And I’ve read that some NFL players regularly put-down astounding amounts of food at training camp, like a dozen eggs, a slab of bacon, a stack of pancakes, and a pitcher of orange juice.

This morning, I had (for me) an unusually large breakfast of three slices of bacon, two slices of toast, two scrambled eggs, a glass of apple cider, and two cups of coffee. That was six hours ago and I’m still full. I won’t need to eat again until tomorrow morning.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 13, 2008 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are now sounding like an idiot.

When information doesn’t jive with your opinion, you attack the credibility of the source. If we are to believe you, every reporter suddenly forgot about their past experiences, lost all journalistic perspective and became willing shills for the government.

It appears you also let your opinion on the politics of the war prejudice your opinion of the execution of the war by our military forces. There have been few campaigns in military history that were as overwhelming successful as the invasion of Iraq. Knocking them for not asking the “Big Questions” is unwarranted, as it was not the job of those particular reporters to ask those questions.

The US has the best trained, best led, best equipment armed forces in history, and are made up of some of the finest young men and women our nation has produced. Tom Brokaw called my father’s generation “The Greatest”. He had it wrong. Today’s generation, as represented by the men and women serving our country in places like Korea, Iraq, the Philippines, Greenland, Kosovo, the Sinai, Afghanistan, Djubuti, Bosnia, at sea around the world, are the “Greatest”. Because they had a choice. Unlike their grandfathers, they all volunteered, knowing that the odds were they’d be sent in harm’s way.

I don’t believe you are an idiot timbo, but you might want to put a little more thought into it before making comments like above. You belittle not only the journalists, who placed themselves in danger to do their job, but the troops they were imbedded with.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 12, 2008 7:18 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No better way

To ruin an effective military unit than to try and turn them into a police force where the locals hate there guts.

by southern oregon on Sep 11, 2008 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Yep.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Sep 11, 2008 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Research tends to support this.

Peace keeping operations are some of the toughest assignments for combat troops, both from an emotional standpoint and from degradation of combat skills.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 12, 2008 7:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is not new info, either

Makes me wonder why the military doesn’t create a corps of soldiers trained specifically for peace-keeping duties.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 12, 2008 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The smart ass response is...

… that’s what the UN is for.

I know that the Marines are training troops in urban control tactics and peacekeeping activities. I’d assume the Army is as well. The problem is that this is not the primary duty of military units. As least not Regular units. As one general put it in remarks to a Senate panel, “Our job is to break things and kill people.” You have only so much time (and budget) in the training cycle and if spend it on peacekeeping training, you sacrifice warfighting training.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 12, 2008 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I read a report of the UN peacekeeping forces

in one of the African nations which had been systematically raping the women in the villages. Literally hundreds had been raped and then shunned by their villages.

The UN has no forces and pays countries to send small units to these situations. Being isolated from their own command might explain the lack of accountability but overall the UN apparently does not audit their own forces to provide accountability.

I agree that military forces are not good options. The quote seems right.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 12, 2008 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've never served in the military

but I am grateful for those of you who have, regardless of why you joined the service. Those who denounce soldiers (and policemen) who make a mistake during a combat or stress situation have no clue what it’s like to make life-and-death decisions in a split-second, or what they sacrifice personally by going through such experiences.

I would say you see things very clearly. There is evil in the world and it wants to kill us. We must deal with it. Walking softly and carrying a wet noodle doesn’t alter any bad guy’s behavior.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 12, 2008 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Things I learned in Vietnam

Some 18 year olds are older than others.All officers with the I will be an admiral or general at all costs tude are politician scumbags who would gladly throw your son or daughter grunt under the bus if it furthered their career.It takes some folks longer to get over it than others,Lord knows it took me a while,some folks never do.I am proud of the folks who are willing to put their ass on the line to protect my kids and grandkids and I despise the politician lungwads who are ever so casual with throwing their lives away any time it helps their all important career path to the top

by southern oregon on Sep 11, 2008 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 12, 2008 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The sad part is that the current administration

and prospective prez. candidates and current/prospective congress have no realistic plan to assist those such as your best friend.

Sophai

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

leave it 2 me to typo my own name

sophia

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that's ok

signed,

adny

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I kind of like it

As much as I like the name Sophia (it’s one of my faves), the name Sophai has an air of mystery to it.

by Corvid on Sep 11, 2008 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not aware that any administration

has paid much more than lip service to helping vets.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So we should abolish the military?

Because anyone who has served in any branch of the military, regardless of what he or she did, is a veteran.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn’t hurt.
But really I was talking about Combat Veterans.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Abolish the military

Support dictators who won’t abolish theirs.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'd like to be a dictator.

I think I could run a happy little country … with a cotton fist.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unfortunately

most use an iron fist, or worse. It’s not really a very nice world out there in a lot of places.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, I realize that.
Life should be spontaneous, not dictated.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why doesn't anyone

ever tell married men that before they get married?

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Need you ask.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i agree its quite sad

i worked for a company that got a contract from the local va to do sleep studies on hundreds of vets of all ages. They were messed up and then we werent getting paid from the va and had to stop treatment…very sad…

Sophia

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Response to stax o' wax

1. Since Hussein killed 100K civilians practically every year, so that is not a good measure. That he did does not necessarily justify the action that was taken, but the fact is that more Iraqis are alive today than if the action had not been taken. You can’t call it a disaster on those grounds. There are much more substantive grounds to oppose the war than that.
2. Whether 9/11 had anything to do with Iraq is not something I was even debating. I was objecting to the idea that 9/11 had nothing to do with the military (you concede it did, in Afghanistan) and to the idea that the military’s response was disastrous.
3. The military performance has not been perfect, either in the war or the occupation. I never claimed it has. But to characterize it as disastrous is insulting.
4. I don’t get the Seinfeld reference and I wasn’t trying to be funny. If I inadvertently said something that sounded like something he said, I apologize. It’s not a topic for being flippant.

It appears to me that too many people are too quick to characterize everything associated with the response to 9/11 as a failure and a disaster, when in fact there have been many successes, and much good has been accomplished, even in Iraq. That is true whether one supports the decision to go there or not. There has been much good and much bad. And those who denigrate the good destroy their own credibility as much as those who pretend there hasn’t been anything wrong with the whole thing.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

"more iraqi's are alive today..."

that’s no necessarily true, I’m not sure exactly what the estimates of civilian casualties in Iraq are right now, but I have seen figures of over 200,000. Also, Saddam was a bad person that did commit genocide, but i have never seen evidence that Saddam killed “100k civilians practically every year.” Sure he killed a lot of people, but i never seen numbers that high before.

by Zaron5551 on Sep 11, 2008 1:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ann Clywd

campaigned for something to be done about Saddam for years.

She saw hundreds of thousands die.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/breakfast_with_frost/2812777.stm

She would have supported immunity for Hussein if it would have prevented war, but she supported war on the grounds of the humanitarian suffering in Iraq alone.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/hardtalk/2933855.stm

Unborn babies and toddlers
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3746428.stm

One million dead in the Iran/Iraq war over 9 years.

Anfal offensives 1987-1988 50-100,000 dead, perhaps more.

Read this, read the section on crimes, and if you aren’t too sick to your stomach to type, then say that nothing good has come out of the war.
http://www.indict.org.uk/index.php

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Vietnamese invaded Cambodia to stop their genocide. It worked and they left.
Apples and Oranges, I know, because they were neighboring nations. How the Middle East leaders can sleep at night is beyond me. How any leader can sleep at night is beyond me. I guess most things are beyond me.
… Go Blazers.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Good example

Bad or good to invade? How about a mix?

A terrible thing to respond to a terrible situation. It would be as wrong to dismiss the good that came of it as to dismiss the bad that came of it. Both happened.

Go Blazers.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well said, man.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well said jscot and yk5 but I said this best

GO BLAZERS!

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

For the last couple thousand years

Everytime the Vietnamese repelled an invader the next thing they would do is take Cambodia and Laos,get bored with it and go home 50 years later.
Somethings never change.
 Go Blazers

by southern oregon on Sep 11, 2008 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to mention that Uday and Qusay

were more than ready to continue Saddam’s legacy long after his eventual death.

Not that the suffering of the citizens of another country at the hands of their leaders is sufficient reason for our sons to die liberating them, but they are in fact liberated. Iraqi women are no longer being raped, citizens are no longer being hauled away in the night never to be seen again, and so on. Like it or not, that is one very positive result of America in Iraq, and there are many others.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm trying to go home ...

but you are totally wrong here, MiledAnimal.
really, on every count.
I’m sorry to say it.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh!

except that his sons were creeps too. I think that is right on the money from everything I’ve read.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 2:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure with what you disagree

I trusted from the context that it was clear I meant that Iraqi leaders are no longer raping and murdering their own people, not that rape or murder never happens at all.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 2:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As in an occupied

Germany

Japan

Bosnia

Kosovo

Sinai (US troops are still patrolling there, not that most Americans are aware of it)

When people say you can’t win an insurgency or an occupation, they don’t know what they are talking about. Both can be won and lost. One key to winning either is commitment and perseverance. A major problem for the US is the populous has a short attention span and expects immediate results.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not an expert on Bosnia or Kosovo

But Germany and Japan did not have active combatants fighting back against the occupation.

We worried they would, and that they were just waiting to fight back, but they didn’t— especially not on the level of what’s going on in Iraq.

I think an occupation can DEFINITELY work, but it takes a lot more cooperation from the locals. They either want to have you there, or aren’t capable of fighting back. That might sound simple, and it is, but to me it seems like the only real way you can maintain an occupation successfully.

If the people don’t want you there and large, organized, and well armed groups are trying to oust you, it makes things a helluva lot harder… seems to me that is very unlike Germany and Japan’s occupation.

Unless I am mistaken. I know I don’t know enough about the other occupations to comment on them.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Sep 11, 2008 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A few months ago

down in England, I saw a war memorial showing the two soldiers from a little village who had died in Germany in WWII.

One of them died in 1949.

There were insurgents in Germany for a while.

I’m not saying it was like Iraq, but people don’t recognize that there was local insurgency. The existence of an insurgency, even for several years after the war, does not mean an occupation can’t succeed.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 12, 2008 12:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There will always be a few rogue insurgents

For several years after the conflict is over, even.

The few who took very few lives in the aftermath of WW2 and the occupations of Germany and Japan are miniscule compared to the lives taken on both sides in the aftermath and occupation of Iraq.

There wasn’t a complex network of insurgents with thousands of soldiers with money, weapons, and social support behind them.

Not that that really matters, since they are two entirely different scenarios, but in Germany and Japan the general public, probably 99.99%, were peaceful with the occupation and okay with it. I know there were some small flare ups afterwards, but nothing like what is happening today. I know you’re not saying it is, but…

But, again, two different scenarios and situations. I don’t expect an occupation in Iraq to go like it would in Germany or Japan.

I DO think that there has to be much more cooperation from the locals, or much more oppressive, draconian measures taken by the occupying force to limit the locals from uprising, for an occupation to be successful. I don’t think either are super likely to happen. It’s a Catch-22.

If they don’t want you there but have accepted the fact you are there and know there is nothing they can do about it, it’s a different story.

What we expected was going to be the Germany insurgency, the werewolves waiting in the woods and whatnot, never truly happened— just flare ups, that might have been covered up at the time but with 60 years having passed certainly not covered up now. They were poorly funded, poorly managed, and never ‘caught on’.

Well, they ‘caught on’ more in the Soviet occupied areas of Germany, but that could also because they were a lil’ more strict with the locals, making them want to fight back.

Oh, it’s a mess. I honestly have no clue what any right answer is.

I just know it’s not similar to our occupations of Germany and Japan, which were LARGELY peaceful and compliant. That’s all my point was— an occupation by itself is not doomed to failure, but it makes things a helluva lot easier of the occupied let you occupy a lil’ more.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Sep 12, 2008 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

All reports are

that the locals are cooperating much more than in the early days. And while the surge has been pretty successful, that is probably the biggest factor in things improving.

I have a relative who was just in Iraq, and he wants to go to Afghanistan next time because he said Iraq has gotten dull and all the action is in Afghanistan. So it may be that, finally, the occupation is starting to succeed.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 12, 2008 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My only uncle on my mother's side was killed by German insurgants

as he was atop a tank after the war was over. So there were at least some (one?). The difference was that the press censored those stories to assist in the war effort (a concept long dead now and probably impossible). It did not make him any less dead or less of a hero for defending us.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 12, 2008 12:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

wrong, we're still occupying those countries we haven't won.

the way you win an occupation is by a). leaving or b). making the occupied terriotry part of your country. So we are still occupying those countries, we have not won.

by Zaron5551 on Sep 11, 2008 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Occupying is inaccurate

Does anyone really think we would refuse to leave Germany and Japan if they didn’t want us there?

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Renters

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Occupation \Oc`cu*pa"tion\, n. [L. occupatio: cf.F. occupation.]

1. The act or process of occupying or taking possession; actual possession and control; the state of being occupied; a holding or keeping; tenure; use; as, the occupation of lands by a tenant.

2. That which occupies or engages the time and attention; the principal business of one’s life; vocation; employment; calling; trade.

Absence of occupation is not rest. —Cowper.

Occupation bridge (Engin.), a bridge connecting the parts of an estate separated by a railroad, a canal, or an ordinary road.

Syn: Occupancy; possession; tenure; use; employment; avocation; engagement; vocation; calling; office; trade; profession.

Source: Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)

 
The United States is taking possesion of land in Germany and Japan, where military bases, so in a sense they are occupying parts of foreign countries. A renter is just paying someone to occupy that persons property. I suppose that Germany and Japan are being paid, but I don’t for sure.

by Zaron5551 on Sep 11, 2008 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They sure seem to think so

Link!

A couple of quotes:

Volkmar Pees, who has served as mayor of an association of towns including Baumholder for 24 years, seemed a little more pessimistic.

“It would be a catastrophe if the Americans would leave without a replacement,” he said."

…the community has to face up to the fact that it will lose about €20 million ($24.7 million) in annual revenue. That’s how much the Americans spend right now.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Every hear of the Soviet Threat?

It is why we stayed there and we do pay enormous rents to the governments that house our overseas bases. Our military in Germany is under the command of NATO and cooperates with the German government to provide European security. It was the same US President that everyone excoriates here that moved most of our military out of Germany during his administration. That move led the German people (probably along with other wrong-headed policies) to remove their own Chancellor who opposed Iraq.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh the Germans are ALL OVER the Iraq occupation aren't they?

……………….. How many troops did they commit to that civil war after the current conservative regime was elected again? Remind us… The “Coalition of the Willing” needs to be applauded for their commitment. So how many troops did the Germans send in again???

"TominHawaii's real name is Hubert and he's a rancher in Burns."

by timbo on Sep 11, 2008 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was a response to the Soviet Threat?

Unless you have better information I see no mention of Germany from Wikipedia here and here:

Invasion:

Approximately 248,000 Soldiers and Marines from the United States, 45,000 British soldiers, 2,000 Australian soldiers, 1,300 Spanish soldiers, 500 Danish soldiers and 194 Polish soldiers were sent to Kuwait for the invasion.101 The invasion force was also supported by Iraqi Kurdish militia troops, estimated to number upwards of 70,000.8 In the latter stages of the invasion 620 troops of the Iraqi National Congress opposition group were deployed to southern Iraq.4

Occupation:

As of September, 2006, there were 21 countries with military forces stationed in Iraq. These were Albania, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Mongolia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, United Kingdom, and the United States. Fiji is also present but under the United Nations banner.75

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 11:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nor did I imply that they were

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now, Michael Richards-- THAT guy's hillarious!

Jscot:—
1) Non sequitur argument and I’d like to see that sourced (actually documented, not second hand generalized accounts) because I’ve never seen evidence he killed that many people a year. And you’re making an assertion you can’t back up on the Iraqi survival rate. Regardless, if your military action kills 100K+ people needlessly, I think that you can consider that disasterous. If not, you have little regard for human life.
2) Agreed—- but your general use of term “military action” lumps both war zones together and I was merely attempting to seperate them as very different cases. I hope you understand my sensitivity to using 9/11 and Iraq in the same frame due to hearing that lie/excuse way too many times in this country. But you are correct— you did not argue that.
3)Who is it insulting to? Nobody is arguing that the troops on the ground were at fault. But the commanders and their civilian leaders should be ashamed. They’ve run the best military in the world into a ditch. The disaster isn’t a tactical one— its the errosion of our military’s fitness by overstretching its capabilities and abusing the ground level troops.
4) Sorry about the Seinfeld reference— it was in reference to another string up above— I was making light of all this.

And your last point— I’m not sure what the point is in saying that some good came out of this miltary action. Many despots around the world (pick one— Mao, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, et al.) could say the same thing about the evils they did, too. I’d like to know what “many successes” you have seen because I’ve apparently missed them.

Anyway, I’m picking the Blazers to with 48 games this year and get that last playoff spot. I’m done talking military politics— its a zero sum game.

by stax o' wax on Sep 12, 2008 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm

1) Check the Indict site I linked to above. No, I don’t consider the death of 100K+ civilians (which also is not documented, but second hand generalizations, and many deaths have been at the hands of insurgents, not the U.S. military action) to be a disaster if it saves more lives. Good? No. Disaster? No, not that either.

2) We’re obviously discussing different things. I was talking about the military, in response to the OP and Y5K’s response. You are talking about political decisions. Maybe Y5K’s response was also talking about political decisions, but if so, it was a non sequitor. To the military, the two war zones are not particularly different cases. In both, they went in and broke things and killed people. In both, they have to try to help rebuild things while also fighting insurgents. Different tactics, of course, driving by the situation on the ground.

From the perspective of the military man, 9/11 led to Iraq. The political question as to whether or not it should have led to Iraq is quite another question.

3) Some of your points probably have more validity than others (general statements which are debatable depending on one’s viewpoint), but they all deal with the political decision to use the military, not the military action itself.

4) No problem.

Last point, about good came out of the military action. Simply this. If you are going to say it is a disaster, you have to look at positive outcomes as well as negative ones, and balance them.

Positive outcomes? You missed them all? That’s part of the problem.

Saddam’s sons aren’t raping women every week. The Kurds aren’t being bombed, strafed, and poisoned in the thousands and hundred thousands. Shiites in the south aren’t being killed. Neither Iran nor Kuwait have been invaded since Saddam fell. Kuwaiti women by the hundreds aren’t being raped. Iranians are not dying of poison gas. Children are not being shoveled into mass graves. Palestinian and Israeli families are not being torn apart by suicide bombings financed by Saddam.

All that is good things resulting from Iraq. Do they justify the decision? That’s an entirely different question. But they have to be reflected in any reasonable analysis of whether or not the decision was a disaster.

If a war advocate looks at Iraq, he only talks about the things I just listed, and none of the concerns you raise. He says it is a huge success. If a war opponent looks at Iraq, he only talks about the things to which you object, and sees none of the things I just listed. Neither has any credibility, until he is willing to consider all the facts.

55 wins, top four seed.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 13, 2008 4:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ever talk to an Iraqi?

I have. Former officer in Saddam’s Army, a Kurd who had to go into hiding after resigning his commission and who later worked as an interpretor for US forces.

You should hear his views on the US being in Iraq and on how long we should stay there.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

talking to one Iraqi

does not make you an expert on the opinions of the Iraqi people.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Sep 11, 2008 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

I didn't say it did.

Nor, for that matter, did I offer what his views were.

I might offer up the view that talking to an Iraqi (and to Americans who have served there), might provide me with a slightly deeper and more nuanced understanding than someone who gets their information from TV and magazines. The operative word being might.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

From what I’ve heard on NPR, many Iraqi’s are very concerned about a US pullout. (Nonetheless, I don’t see a better course of action. On that same note, I have next-to zero qualifications to make such a guess, aside from being a person who dislikes human suffering, and prolonging it, and the idea of military action in general.)

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The suffering if Iran invades might be really bad

once we pull out. The animosity between those two countries is pretty high I have read. Apparently most of the materials and many of the insurgents themselves are Iranian supplied now that the Sunnis have stopped.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 12, 2008 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what did the Iraqi officer say?

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good thing there is a finite number of bad guys!

We knock one down, cross him off the list, move on to the next.

I’ve talked to Iraqis, I got friends and family over there, lots and lots of vets in the family. No one is an expert on these matters, even when serving over there and living through it. Most think it is a huge mess with no clear endgame (the ones who argue FOR it are the vets from WW2 in my family).

I have no clue what we should do, but we will never run out of bad guys to kill. I also worry about creating so many bad guys we will never be able to keep up.

Right or wrong, correct or ignorant, an overwhelming amount of military and civilians and mercenaries I have met are not “for” it, but don’t have any workable answer. That’s the problem. Well, the mercs are more for it since they’re paid pretty well and are doing it for those reasons. They still say it’s just… what it is.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Sep 11, 2008 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he was a Kurd, let me guess that the bad guess in his opinion are mostly Shiite and Sunni

The only way to govern this mess would be to split up the state in three territories. That might happen in a few years, and it would still not be pretty cause the natural resources are not distributed equally to the north, west and south of the country. No force in history has ever “occupied” this region for long, and a whole lot have tried.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 11, 2008 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He doesn't think that.

Things are not as simple as reporters and politicians try to make them. They assume we are not as smart and sophisticated as they are and therefore believe that telling us the 3rd grade version is the only way we will understand. Unfortunately, most politicians and journalists operate on a 12th grade level of understanding. They usually don’t know what they are talking about.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The US humped the pooch on Kurdish independence...

………………….. and a Kurd is not the person to be asking about how long the US should be intervening in a Sunni/Shiite civil war.

"TominHawaii's real name is Hubert and he's a rancher in Burns."

by timbo on Sep 11, 2008 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

........................................ because he's a weenie.

"TominHawaii's real name is Hubert and he's a rancher in Burns."

by timbo on Sep 11, 2008 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I remember scenes, from the first Bush war,

of Kurds evacuating with their children and belongings on their backs, in carts or on pack animals after being abandoned by the US. I remember overhead scenes of roads clogged with many thousands of people of all ages evacuating with everything they could carry, or carrying nothing at all, struggling up a hill with a 10-15% grade while watching for air strikes.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Sep 11, 2008 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

parting 9/11 thought

why hasnt Osama been captured or killed yet? I wonder if they’re ever going around to doing that,

Fea dis

by bow4meow on Sep 11, 2008 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course, I also remember the tight shots of the

few people attending the US production of pulling down the Saddam statue.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Sep 11, 2008 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't say it wasn't a disaster

And I also don’t include Iraq as the military response to 9/11, because it clearly wasn’t related to 9/11 despite what our crooked, corrupt President has sometimes said.

Afghanistan was legit even though we’ve blundered that one as well.

by BlazerD on Sep 11, 2008 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

recced

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Answer to Zaron5551 on his signature blog

Zach, your signature blog fails on several points.

1. It operates under the assumption that what God could do, God should do. This is a logical leap. Since God could have made us all moral slaves who would never commit moral evil, He should have done so. All you have for that is your opinion, which is as valid as anyone else’s opinion, but it is not proof of anything.

2. It is time-limited. Though it is not explicitly stated, your argument that this is not the best possible world is rooted in an assumption that this world will not change dramatically for the better. Probably 99% of theists believe that God is not finished with His activity in relation to this world. If you ask the theist if this is the best possible world, he will say, “Not yet, but it is going to be.” So your argument doesn’t really engage theistic belief.

3. Your argument that moral evil can be caused by physical evil is logically insupportable. The most you can say is that physical evil can create opportunities and incentives to commit moral evil. The only way in which a physical evil can “cause” moral evil is if the physical evil actually forces the person to do the moral evil, and few ethicists (theistic or otherwise) would consider the person who is forced to take action to have committed a moral evil. The woman who is forcibly raped has not committed adultery, or any other moral evil. She is a victim of physical evil which was brought upon her by the moral evil of another agent.

4. You logically contradict yourself when you argue (near the end) for determinism. That is inconsistent with the entire concept of moral evil, on which you have built much of your argument. If there is absolute determinism, there is no such thing as moral evil. We are all slaves who do what we are compelled to do (same point as I made in #3 above).

5. In talking about moral evil causing other evil, I think you have a valid point to an extent, but you are conflating “cause” with “contributing factor”. If slavery had been the only contributing factor, it is unlikely the Civil War would have taken place. There were other contributing factors. People made decisions. (By the way, the slavery described in the Old Testament is more like the “indentured servants” in the early days of the colonies. Every seven years, the slaves were freed, unless they voluntarily chose to remain in slavery, which apparently some did.)

6. You argue that “there has never been a single incident of physical evil which was proven to be caused by moral evil.” The families of drunk drivers who died would perhaps not agree with you. The moral evil of driving drunk resulted in the physical evil of terrible accidents. Furthermore, in your discussion of Katrina, your refutation of Hagee fails. I don’t endorse his statement (he has no solid evidence, Biblical or otherwise, for it). But your answer fails logically because it overlooks the evident fact that the moral evil of some can result in physical evil impacting on others. Again, drunk drivers have killed others besides themselves. A murderer brings physical evil on his victim, and his moral evil also hopefully brings physical evil upon himself (loss of freedom, at least).

Note that I am not attempting in the least to prove the existence of any God, let alone any particular God. But you really seem to want feedback on your blog, and those are some of the things that stand out to me.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 7:06 AM PDT reply actions   4 recs

The logic is consistent

but the conclusions are vacuous.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 8:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

“Note that I am not attempting in the least to prove the existence of any God…”

Reason #1: it can’t be done.

by stax o' wax on Sep 11, 2008 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Love your argument.

+1

Very good job countering his points while being civil and polite.

by Cablinasian on Sep 11, 2008 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thanks
1. It operates under the assumption that what God could do, God should do. This is a logical leap. Since God could have made us all moral slaves who would never commit moral evil, He should have done so. All you have for that is your opinion, which is as valid as anyone else’s opinion, but it is not proof of anything.

Of course that is the crux of the argument, the atheist would say God should have made us better, to choose good all time. The theist will say the atheist has no way of knowing what God should do. I agree with the theist up until this point, if God exists, then certainly man would not know what God should do, but the theist will typically add, usually because of faith, this is the world God should have made. Again the theist doesn’t know if this is the world God should have made, they, like the atheist, are assuming something. If I sound like I’m proving that any God does not exist in the piece I need to clarify it, because I’m speaking only about the theistic God. I do need to clarify that point, part of what I was trying to do with this is go over theodices and show why I did think they were very solid.

2. It is time-limited. Though it is not explicitly stated, your argument that this is not the best possible world is rooted in an assumption that this world will not change dramatically for the better. Probably 99% of theists believe that God is not finished with His activity in relation to this world. If you ask the theist if this is the best possible world, he will say, "Not yet, but it is going to be." So your argument doesn’t really engage theistic belief.

The question remains then: why did God allow so much evil up until now? I think the argument stands because even if the world dramatically improves, “the world” is a term where you have to consider the past. So, in the future conditions of the world very well may improve, but the world is still not necessarily good overall. Also, about 44% of theists in the United States think the the rapture is going to happen in the next fifty years, so it certainly won’t improve for a while. In fact most theist would say the world won’t improve until Christ returns with 1000 years of peace. I would argue that world with out a deity reigning over it and world with a deity reigning over it are completely different worlds. So in fact the world won’t improve.

3. Your argument that moral evil can be caused by physical evil is logically insupportable. The most you can say is that physical evil can create opportunities and incentives to commit moral evil. The only way in which a physical evil can "cause" moral evil is if the physical evil actually forces the person to do the moral evil, and few ethicists (theistic or otherwise) would consider the person who is forced to take action to have committed a moral evil. The woman who is forcibly raped has not committed adultery, or any other moral evil. She is a victim of physical evil which was brought upon her by the moral evil of another agent.

You’re absolutely right, when I was writing this I was coming for a deterministic point of view, where a multitude of events cause another event. So in that sense physical evil can partially cause moral evil. I need to clarify this piece by taking out all of the determinism and just assume that free will exists.

4. You logically contradict yourself when you argue (near the end) for determinism. That is inconsistent with the entire concept of moral evil, on which you have built much of your argument. If there is absolute determinism, there is no such thing as moral evil. We are all slaves who do what we are compelled to do (same point as I made in #3 above).

Again, I need to take out the determinism. I would say though that as a determinist I still believe that we live in a world where we feel like we are free and as such every person if responsible for their actions, even if they were really caused by a myriad of factors.

5. In talking about moral evil causing other evil, I think you have a valid point to an extent, but you are conflating "cause" with "contributing factor". If slavery had been the only contributing factor, it is unlikely the Civil War would have taken place. There were other contributing factors. People made decisions. (By the way, the slavery described in the Old Testament is more like the "indentured servants" in the early days of the colonies. Every seven years, the slaves were freed, unless they voluntarily chose to remain in slavery, which apparently some did.)

This a good point, but I think that most of the causes of the civil war are moral evils. In reality I need to have a clearer example, but I think it’s a responsible argument. As far a biblical slavery goes, it was still slavery, masters where still allowed to beat there slaves, it’s still reprehensible. I would say the indentured servitude here in the United States was a form of a higher class in enslaving the lower class. So while it is better than classic southern slavery it is still slavery and still wrong, and God condoned it. That says most of what I want to know about God.

6. You argue that "there has never been a single incident of physical evil which was proven to be caused by moral evil." The families of drunk drivers who died would perhaps not agree with you. The moral evil of driving drunk resulted in the physical evil of terrible accidents. Furthermore, in your discussion of Katrina, your refutation of Hagee fails. I don’t endorse his statement (he has no solid evidence, Biblical or otherwise, for it). But your answer fails logically because it overlooks the evident fact that the moral evil of some can result in physical evil impacting on others. Again, drunk drivers have killed others besides themselves. A murderer brings physical evil on his victim, and his moral evil also hopefully brings physical evil upon himself (loss of freedom, at least).

See I see this as a gray area because I would call the death of the drunk driver a result of moral evil and the affect of moral evil on someone that didn’t perpetrate the evil, not physical evil. I don’t think the refute of Hagee fails because I am not saying what Hagee said was impossible. God could cause a hurricane to wipe out New Orleans. God causing a hurricane just seems improbable because God could have just taken out the evil people individually if he wanted to. So the question becomes why did God take out all of New Orleans?

Over all you have some good points and I’ll work on correcting some parts and clarifying others.

by Zaron5551 on Sep 11, 2008 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you haven't read much of it

I suggest looking into the Skeptical Inquirer it is a pretty entertaining and interesting magazine. I remember there was an article about a debate between a religious figure supportive of creationism and an atheist supportive of evolution, and the point was made that nobody can out-debate religious figures because that is almost all they operate on, strained logic, and they are very good at it. Here’s an article I think you might find particularly interesting. If I were to make any suggestion, it would be to delve more into history and science instead of logic, which is playing right into the strengths of what you oppose.

P.S. I’m not an atheist (I guess I’m some kind of pragmatic agnostic, maybe even ignostic, I just think being an atheist requires the same leap of faith as religion) but I’m supportive.

"I think JamesOn is a real smart lil cutie pie." -annthefan, 8/22/2008

Salaam.

by JamesOn on Sep 11, 2008 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Interesting
Of course that is the crux of the argument, the atheist would say God should have made us better, to choose good all time. The theist will say the atheist has no way of knowing what God should do. I agree with the theist up until this point, if God exists, then certainly man would not know what God should do, but the theist will typically add, usually because of faith, this is the world God should have made. Again the theist doesn’t know if this is the world God should have made, they, like the atheist, are assuming something. If I sound like I’m proving that any God does not exist in the piece I need to clarify it, because I’m speaking only about the theistic God. I do need to clarify that point, part of what I was trying to do with this is go over theodices and show why I did think they were very solid.

I guess you do need to clarify. :-) You say “Reasons I Have no God” but really, it is reasons why you don’t have a particular kind of theistic God. Most of the theists I know would NOT say God >should< have done anything, and I certainly wouldn’t say that. Rather, I would say that what God has chosen to do is consistent with His goodness. It is true that I make that statement on faith, just like the theist who says this is the world God should have made (though I don’t ever recall hearing a theist make that statement).

The question remains then: why did God allow so much evil up until now?

Not all theists are Bible believers, of course, but the Bible does answer that very question. It indicates that God is going to destroy the evil, but He is waiting for more people to repent of their evil and turn to Him, so that they do not have to be destroyed in their evil. It’s in II Peter 3. Again, this is a matter of faith, but it is logically consistent with the rest of a theistic view.

So in that sense physical evil can partially cause moral evil. I need to clarify this piece by taking out all of the determinism and just assume that free will exists.

I suppose it depends on what you want to accomplish. If you are a determinist and you want to say why you don’t have a God, you ought to leave the determinism in. If you are trying to say that you reject theism because theism is logically inconsistent (it isn’t, but I think that’s what you are trying to say), then you really need to get the perspective of theism, which isn’t generally deterministic (as you’ve said, there are a few exceptions, but it certainly isn’t mainstream theism).

I guess what it comes down to is the question, is this your personal statement of faith :-), or is it your evangelistic attempt to convert theists to your cause? If the latter, you need to be able to address it from their perspective. If the former, don’t waste your time and just say what you believe.

I would say though that as a determinist I still believe that we live in a world where we feel like we are free and as such every person if responsible for their actions, even if they were really caused by a myriad of factors

That, my friend, is fascinating. We’re responsible because we “feel like we are free”, even though we aren’t really free at all? I think that takes post-modernism somewhere I didn’t really know it went. And theism is supposed to be illogical? :-) Maybe you’ve not worded it clearly.

This a good point, but I think that most of the causes of the civil war are moral evils.

I agree, absolutely. It was moral decisions (or maybe I should say immoral ones) made by many people on both sides that caused it.

As far a biblical slavery goes, it was still slavery, masters where still allowed to beat there slaves, it’s still reprehensible.

I’m not aware of anywhere that it says they were allowed to beat their slaves. Perhaps you could enlighten me. Biblical slavery was simply a solution to debt. If you were in debt, you could sell your services for 1-7 years (however long it was until the 7 year release year) to pay off the debt. You were still to consider your “slave” as your brother. You weren’t even supposed to count the years, you were supposed to pay the same if someone came to you one year before the release year as if he came to you seven years before it.

It was a way to help people out of financial difficulties without destroying them forever. They weren’t supposed to sell their land, because then the wealthy would get all the land, and become more wealthy. You worked for someone to clear the debt, and then you could go back to working your own land. It may not have been perfect, but it is actually a lot better than any system working anywhere in the world today. The rich couldn’t get all the land, so there was always a reasonable distribution of wealth, but those who didn’t work would have consequences.

See I see this as a gray area because I would call the death of the drunk driver a result of moral evil and the affect of moral evil on someone that didn’t perpetrate the evil, not physical evil.

Now, I do think you are being illogical here.
Zach says: 1. Person A (drunk driver) commits a moral evil. 2. That moral evil causes an accident. 3. Person B (accident victim) is affected by the moral evil.
Hagee says: 1. Person A (homosexual) commits a moral evil. 2. That moral evil causes a hurricane. 3. Person B (hurricane victim) is affected by the moral evil.

I see no logical difference between the two statements. Like I said, it’s not that I agree with Hagee, but if he’s being illogical, so are you, and if he isn’t, then you are being illogical to say he is.
 
And the question remains, why are you saying the accident victim is a victim of moral evil if in fact you are a determinist? You really are going to tie yourself in knots (and I’ll help you do so:-)) with this determinism. Because no one is truly determinist, and no one can truly reject the existence of real morality.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That, my friend, is fascinating. We’re responsible because we "feel like we are free", even though we aren’t really free at all? I think that takes post-modernism somewhere I didn’t really know it went. And theism is supposed to be illogical? :-) Maybe you’ve not worded it clearly.

It’s no so much that people need to be punished, but because people that have been determined to commit one evil are highly probable to commit another moral evil. So to hold someone responsible is not necessarily to blame for what they did rather to try to stop them for more causing more evil.

I think i wrote that Hagee’s statement was illogical, I’ll give that it wasn’t illogical, rather wrong. Also Katrina was an obvious phyiscal evil, that Hagee said moral evil caused, the gay pride parade. Where as the drunk driver is committing a moral evil and God, if free will exists, wouldn’t stop it. So the Hurricane was caused by God to kill gay people and just happened to wipe out everyone else, whereas the drunk driver would not be stopped by God.

Slavery in the bible from evilbible.com

Except for murder, slavery has got to be one of the most immoral things a person can do. Yet slavery is rampant throughout the Bible in both the Old and New Testaments. The Bible clearly approves of slavery in many passages, and it goes so far as to tell how to obtain slaves, how hard you can beat them, and when you can have sex with the female slaves.

 

    Many Jews and Christians will try to ignore the moral problems of slavery by saying that these slaves were actually servants or indentured servants. Many translations of the Bible use the word “servant”, “bondservant”, or “manservant” instead of “slave” to make the Bible seem less immoral than it really is. While many slaves may have worked as household servants, that doesn’t mean that they were not slaves who were bought, sold, and treated worse than livestock.

 

    The following passage shows that slaves are clearly property to be bought and sold like livestock.

 

    However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)

 

    The following passage describes how the Hebrew slaves are to be treated.

 

    If you buy a Hebrew slave, he is to serve for only six years. Set him free in the seventh year, and he will owe you nothing for his freedom. If he was single when he became your slave and then married afterward, only he will go free in the seventh year. But if he was married before he became a slave, then his wife will be freed with him. If his master gave him a wife while he was a slave, and they had sons or daughters, then the man will be free in the seventh year, but his wife and children will still belong to his master. But the slave may plainly declare, ‘I love my master, my wife, and my children. I would rather not go free.’ If he does this, his master must present him before God. Then his master must take him to the door and publicly pierce his ear with an awl. After that, the slave will belong to his master forever. (Exodus 21:2-6 NLT)

 

    Notice how they can get a male Hebrew slave to become a permanent slave by keeping his wife and children hostage until he says he wants to become a permanent slave. What kind of family values are these?

 

    The following passage describes the sickening practice of sex slavery. How can anyone think it is moral to sell your own daughter as a sex slave?

 

    When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl’s owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment. (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT)

 

    So these are the Bible family values! A man can buy as many sex slaves as he wants as long as he feeds them, clothes them, and screws them!

 

    What does the Bible say about beating slaves? It says you can beat both male and female slaves with a rod so hard that as long as they don’t die right away you are cleared of any wrong doing.

 

    When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)

 

    You would think that Jesus and the New Testament would have a different view of slavery, but slavery is still approved of in the New Testament, as the following passages show.

 

    Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ. (Ephesians 6:5 NLT)

 

    Christians who are slaves should give their masters full respect so that the name of God and his teaching will not be shamed. If your master is a Christian, that is no excuse for being disrespectful. You should work all the harder because you are helping another believer by your efforts. Teach these truths, Timothy, and encourage everyone to obey them. (1 Timothy 6:1-2 NLT)

 

    In the following parable, Jesus clearly approves of beating slaves even if they didn’t know they were doing anything wrong.

 

    The servant will be severely punished, for though he knew his duty, he refused to do it. “But people who are not aware that they are doing wrong will be punished only lightly. Much is required from those to whom much is given, and much more is required from those to whom much more is given.” (Luke 12:47-48 NLT)

Also just to clarify this is more a personal thing “why I don’t have a God.” I’m not trying to convince anyone. I personally believe in trying to change peoples beliefs unless they are dangerous to others.

by Zaron5551 on Sep 11, 2008 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

as far my determinism goes it likes this...

Everything that happens has been determined to occur by set circumstances before the thing occurred, but we cannot ever know all of those circumstances so in essence we are free. We feel free, we make decision believing we a free, but in fact an analysis of any choice would show that there are a number of reasons, determining factors, why a person made that specific choice.

by Zaron5551 on Sep 11, 2008 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, you put so much effort into that

and still came up with a bunch of wrong conclusions. No, I’m not going to spend the rest of the afternoon addressing the points you raised. Believe what you want. I just wonder why you work so hard at disputing what others believe if you yourself don’t believe it and aren’t threatened by it.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Impressive quote post

U Da Man!

Early one mornin the sun was shinin,I was layin in bed
Wondrin if they'd changed at all,If there unies was still red.

by BlueBooYay on Sep 11, 2008 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have followed your exhange with jscot with interest

Perhaps allowing comments on your blog might foster the same give and take from more people.

There are some differences to the responses that might be worthy of further study.

1. The existence of the physical world is not autonomous with the existence of the spiritual world. The Scriptures teach that corruption came into the physical world in Genesis. That corruption was both moral and natural. Mankind and nature were all permeated. Thus the moral and physical evil you describe is the same thing – corruption. The spiritual is completely undefined and it is my personal belief that the spiritual controls the physical is sub-microscopic detail. That spiritual includes both good (God) and evil (Satan). In any event the spiritual is not reveled by the physical.

2. Man can be divided into two camps: Those who want to be God and nobody else. This desire may be manifested by those who say “God should” as well as those who say “God cannot”. It may also be manifested by those with insurance on their house (for if God causes or allows all things, whom am I insuring against?). It may be manifested by judging others and many other forms. This desire is a result of the corruption. I am one of those who manifests it. But I am aware of this corruption within me some of the time. Those who are atheists may actually be declaring themselves to be God. If they cannot control the physical world by their physical actions (which could prove they are God), they may want to control by their mental processes (there is no God).

3. The purpose of God in the physical world is not evident in the physical world. In fact nobody in the physical world (Theists or Atheists) can know the mind of God and He apparently reveals only a tiny part in the Scriptures.

4. Most verses of the Scriptures are should’s and should not’s. Laws and commands. This is true of the Old Testament and the New Testament. They are, according to the letter to the Romans, for the purpose of failure that man may know we are not God. The purpose according the Paul in Romans is to lead us to Christ. Jesus says those who judge others will be judged by the same standard. This is not the definitive knowledge of God but a small peek into His purposes.

5. The use of parables by Jesus and recorded in the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) needs further study for the examples used are not espousal but illustration in the venacular of the listeners. In the same way I would not say that all believers will be rich because Jesus said “much shall be given” in Matthew 25. The riches of this world are in the parable but the riches he speaks of are in the spiritual.

I am thankful that you are so hungry to search out truth. I would be delighted if all were so hungry. Thank you.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you for youre service BlazerD.

"Rudy Fernández ha confirmado hoy que la próxima temporada jugará en el Portland Trail Blazers"

by $chonzarelli on Sep 11, 2008 7:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I consider inappropriate the title of this fanpost.

 It was on topic. And this is the Junk Drawer, where off topic happens. :-)

The Midnight Rambler

by amlmart1 on Sep 11, 2008 8:48 AM PDT reply actions   3 recs

I think Bayless will win rookie of the year

Strange, but I suspect this belief makes me a heretic on this site, because everyone else thinks Oden will win rookie of the year. And a few people seem to think Rudy will win it.

Me, I’m calling it now. Bayless for ROY. I truly think that Oden will be brought along slowly, due to injury concerns and due to Oden’s rawness.

Winning is everything.

by MT Suit on Sep 11, 2008 9:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The fantasy experts on ESPN seem to agree that Bayless might score considerably more than Rudy and Oden

And rebounds are not so important to win individual awards, putting Oden maybe at a disadvantage even if he does play a lot. Yet Beasley and Mayo might outscore Bayless, which in turn could mean none of our rookies wins it. I still think Oden has a good chance to win ROY, Bayless and Rudy to make the All-Rookie Second Team.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 11, 2008 9:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bayless will be ROY

i just know it. Call it women’s intuition if you will. According to MB he has been superb in his outside defense and we all know how much name looveeess a great defender. If BayBay can keep up his good d then Nate gives him more PT and he makes big impact and then he wins ROY…

Rudy is our future finals MVP
Oden is our superstar allstar

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could live with that ;-)

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 11, 2008 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

who is brandon roy?

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

im sorry im still confused, we are talking about potential ROY candidates on our

team and you bring up Brandon Roy, as if he has something to do w/ it. He already won ROY and is currently our allstar but we aren’t talking about BROY we are talking about our rookies…

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm talking about your kid's dentist.

“Lady, c’mon. Do I go down to your office and start shooting a buncha pictures?”

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

HAHA

I had to document my son’s first teeth cleaning!!!

(parents tend to make EVERYTHING into ‘milestones’ )

Sophia

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

WE ARE TALKING ABOUT OUR ROOKIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

While other teams are talking about if their #1 pick rookie will even start

Good God…
http://www.blogabull.com/2008/9/10/612001/poll-derrick-rose-opening

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 11, 2008 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That is funny!

And I say Bull!

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Amounts to a Foye and cash

"Why would we lie to ourselves dude?"
"Be excellent to each other."
"All we are is dust in the wind, dude."
"Strange things are afoot at the Circle K."

The Wisdom of Bill S Preston Esquire and Ted Theodore Logan

by GreatOden'sRaven on Sep 11, 2008 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Baylesss won't get enough PT to be a serious ROY candidate.

Beasley and Rose will get full time minutes.

I like corn

I'm a little confused by your tactics

by oderiferous emanations 74 on Sep 11, 2008 9:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What does Jarrett have to do with anything?

Are you just asking this question randomly?

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The makeup of the team is essentially the same as last year's...

with Bayless taking Jarrett’s role. He’s not going to be a go-to scorer or takeover artist, no, he’s going to have a utility garbage, down-on-the-floor, rotation role no matter how much talent he brings to the team. That takes him out of contention for awards. It just does.

by 0004248939 on Sep 11, 2008 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are wrong, and I like Broccoli

JB will be in contention for ROY because he is a baller, I rewatched the summer league game last night when he scored 36 points including 29 in the second half, and the game winner, then dunked so hard Rudy got jealous, Jack NEVER did anything like that, he would get the ball in the 4th, drive to the basket, and loose it out of bounds, OR, Jack in the corner for three, fakes the shot and drives the lane, oh wait, he stepped out of bounds again!

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Regardless of talent and ability, he doesn't have opportunity to win awards (maybe 6th man)

Kevin Durant almost didn’t get ROY last year taking 25 shot attempts a game!

by 0004248939 on Sep 11, 2008 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he also only shot 37% from the field...

he still won so it doesnt matter.

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is not a forgon e conclusion that Bayless will simply step into the shoe prints

jarret left.
Sophia

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope not

Jarrett’s shoe prints were out of bounds way too moch

by southern oregon on Sep 11, 2008 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice!

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 12, 2008 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Does anyone know of an effective treatment for hemoroids?

I ask because my dad always told me he should have named me Hemi. When I looked at him in a confused state, he went on to say that it was short for hemoroid. I was apparantly that much of a pain in the ass.

So I need to learn about methods for dealing with hemoroids. It’s a matter of self preservation.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 9:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Better yet, drink an extra-spicy Bloody Mary in reverse.

(The celery and pickled olives are the real treat! Beware toothpicks.)

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 10:00 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, double your pleasure, double your fun

with hot, spicy poop shooting out of your bum.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yikes!

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pull the cheeks together, hold, relax

I’m only half joking, cause training is really believed to prevent a lot of problems in that area. If it’s already bad, there are a number of topical creams and radical surgical methods…

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 11, 2008 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stay off of cold bridge piers

(seriously a doctor once said that to me).

There is no treatment. They are designed to focus our attention away from wars and famine and other silly little problems. I met a woman in the hospital 30 years ago who told me “don’t ever let anyone take your hemorrhoids out surgically”. She did not look like she was enjoying the experience. Sadly 29 years later a misguided surgeon searching for a hemorrhaging tumor decided mine were in her way and I can echo those long-agp sentiments. Since I cannot tolerate pain medications the first week after surgery was not my favorite week.

You can use hydrocortisone to shrink them and Witch Hazel to numb them a bit.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 9:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How does Norsktroll make his diaries come and go?

Where is the hotspots diary? At one point overnight it was in the top 5 and had 30 new comments then it went away. And his EuroBasket post keeps moving to the top.

Kilroy was here.

by tominhawaii on Sep 11, 2008 9:42 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I updated the post and checked the "update time" box

That brings it back up from the archive. Should I not do this? Posts with more recs still get replaced by newer ones that get rec’d into the top by some algorithm I think I haven’t fully understood. It’s not exactly as sophisticated as Digg, but still there seems more to it. Besides, I wanted comments, not recs.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 11, 2008 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah It's Cool

I was just wondering how it was done. The first few times I couldn’t understand how “brand new” posts had 60 comments and I had already marked half of them as read.

I have a huge, but useless, set of wooden genitals.

by tominhawaii on Sep 12, 2008 3:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Da Kine settings

I have my BEdge set to 50 fanposts and 20 fanshots. I like it for the most part because it is the same length as the mainposts that I have set at 10.

Kilroy was here.

by tominhawaii on Sep 11, 2008 9:57 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Questions about preseason games.

May I watch these games by internet?
There will be Game Open Threads?

The Midnight Rambler

by amlmart1 on Sep 11, 2008 10:03 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd, thank you BlazerD, every Vet should be thanked daily

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 10:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

espn Fantasy preview

ESPN came out with their fantasy basketball guide today, and in their top 15 there was one big obmission, Brandon Roy. I couldn’t find him anywhere on their site, first I looked at the SG’s, here is the list.

1. Kobe
2. Wade
3. Iverson
4. V. Carter
5. Iguodala
6. Manu
7. Pierce
8. Joe Johnson
9. Mike Dunleavy
10. J. Richardson
11. K. Durant
12. Hedo Turkoglu
13. Kevin Martin
14. Jason Terry
15. Ray Allen

Roy’s stats from last season:
19.1pts, 5.8ast, 4.7reb, 1.8 TO’s, 45FG, 343pt, 1.1stl.

Maybe I am a homer but I would rate B. Roy’s fantasy value, (meaning just his stats) above or at least the same as…

  1. Mike Dunleavy
    19.1pts, 3.5ast, 5.2reb, 2.3TOs, 48FG, 83FT 1.0stl.
  2. K. Durant
    20.3pts. 2.4ast, 4.4 reb, 2.9 TO’s 43% FG, 87% FT 1.0stl.
  3. Jason Terry
    15.5pts, 3.2ast, 2.5rebs, 1.1TO’s 47% FG, 86% FT, 1.1stl.
  4. Ray Allen
    17.4pts, 3.1ast, 3.7Rebs, 1.7TO’s, 45FG, 91FT, .9stl.

So where was he listed? #23 after other players such as Ricky davis, Ben Gordon, Mike Miller and Monta Ellis. Here is what they had to say about Roy.
"2009 Outlook: This could be the season Roy joins the elite group of shooting guards. All the elements are there: he scores, rebounds, passes and gets enough steals that just a modest increase across the board would put him in special company. He is close already. His 4.7 boards per game were ninth among shooting guards and his 5.8 dimes ranked second in just his second season. Only his 3-pointers (1.0 per game) and steals (1.1) suppress his value. Keep track of Roy’s health through training camp as he underwent arthroscopic surgery to repair a torn meniscus in August. "
They also projected each players stats for next season and came to the following conclusion for Roy. 18.5pts, 5.3Asts, 4.6rebs, 45FG,78FT,1.9TOs,and 1.1stls. They basically believe his individual production will go down with the arrival of Oden, Rudy and Bayless. Not sure I agree but I can see the arguement.

I then figured they must have him listed as a top 15 PG, But Roy was not listed at all in the PG catagory.

So I then looked at the SF catagory thinking they must have just placed him there, however once again he was not listed in the SF catagory.

So I looked at the Guard catagory, which listed all guards in the league, and Roy comes in at #32 behind quite a few badabons of the NBA in my opinion. Roy is not all about stats, but he does accrue them quite consistantly from game to game, so it is very odd to me that he doesn’t rank a bit higher, especially when I see some of the names above him.

Btw Greg Oden was the only Blazer to be ranked in the top 15 in any catagory. Obviously that was in the Center catagory, where they ranked him #10 with the following remarks.

“2009 Outlook: The Blazers will bring the big fella along slowly. While Oden looked good in his first public workouts, the team will take no chances on a setback. Look for his minutes to climb as the season progresses, much as the Suns did with Amare Stoudemire two seasons ago. The defense and rebounding should come back quickly for Oden. Temper your expectations on offense and understand that the speed of the NBA game could present Oden with foul trouble to start the season. In the end, the blocks and rebounds could be elite, which makes him worth a pick in the middle rounds.”

Their stats projections are as follows:
12.4pts, 1.3asts, 9.7Rebs, 2.1Blocks, 2.3TO’s 57FG, 72Ft .5stls.

by usmcr3049 on Sep 11, 2008 11:01 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Roy's better in reality than fantasy

He doesn’t get you enough 3s or steals.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Sep 11, 2008 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wait - (confused) - we can talk about basketball in here????

Even if it is fantasy basketball it is a relief from weightier subjects!

Seems to me (I am not a fantasy basketball player) that the criteria for fantasy is different than the criteria for – All Star or the criteria for – Championship. Do they consider the number of games likely to be played as well as per-game stats? Would that be the difference?

Also since ESPN is your source and Henry Abbott is not your author (or is he?) the credibility issue is pretty high. Who knew Turkoglou is a SG? I don’t remember Sacramento or Orlando using him there – only at SF and PF. Even NBA.com lists him as a Forward.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 9:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Postions are kind of flexible in fantasy basketball

If you play a position just for a little bit a couple of times you can be eligible for that slot on your squad. This sometimes creates situations like Boris Diaw’s first season in Phoenix where he was able to be (at least in my league) a C,PF,SF or PG.

by tingeyga on Sep 11, 2008 10:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks - I remember Diaw himself was confused!

Actually Diaw had his best year – maybe to show Atlanta what fools they were to trade him.

In fantasy football (Yahoo) positions are often a problem because once Yahoo decides you are a linebacker (his college position) your time as a running back (even a starter for the Cowboys) is not eligible to play as a running back. I only play in a family league which plays only players from a favorite team (making it much easier to manage). Nine members nine favorite teams.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 11:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The term "Trojan Moose" termed by Huffington for Palin isn't bad

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 11, 2008 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Olbermann is a jackass. Which he manages to prove over and over again.

I love him criticizing McCain for being slick. That’s exactly Olbermann’s ticket to success, being slick.

And please spare us the whinning about our collective wounded American psyche. I know my psyche is not wounded, damaged or afflicted in any way. I see pictures like those Olbermann seems so upset by and I don’t become tramatized. I just think about how proud I am that I have family members out there killing the bastards that believe we are the Great Satan. When someone wants to take away all that you have, you don’t talk to them. You don’t try to reason with them or understand where they are coming from. You kill them. Someone such as Olbermann, who doesn’t have the first inkling of what service or sacrific is, doesn’t get it and is too squimish to acknowledge that there are better people than he out there making sure that he can enjoy his expensive suits and nice salary.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

+1

I’m cheerleading for jscot and timg today.

I shoot layups like they're jumpers.

by MiledAnimal on Sep 11, 2008 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

LOL

I’m not a Bush/McCain supporter (not that they care).

I just get tired of lack of perspective.

The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.

by jscot on Sep 11, 2008 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+2

Same here.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 9:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Olbermann is clearly not neutral

but compared to O’Reilly, he’s pretty dang close.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Sep 11, 2008 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No shite

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The most credible journalist out there today is Jon Stewart.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Sep 11, 2008 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions   3 recs

+1

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Sep 11, 2008 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jon Stewart = My news source

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 as well

I think there’s even some research out there that backs you up.

by Corvid on Sep 11, 2008 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As a journalist today, I cringingly agree, but only in the world of TV news.

Print media still has some amazing folks out there.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OK, I'll bite

Just curious, who do you think is amazing? (I like the print media too.)

by Corvid on Sep 11, 2008 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And I’ll be forced to admit that I don’t follow bylines … just stories.
My friend Paisley Dodds at AP in London can battle the best of them when her ire is up. I once heard her chew out a U.S. Colonel for kicking her out of Guantanamo for her “bad attitude.” He was forced to let her back in.
I’m sorry to not be more help here. I just really don’t remember the names, only the stories.

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not amazing but FT.com

hs some of the better world coverages imo.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Sep 11, 2008 9:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah

i love steven cobert too.. :)

"Thank God those nightmarish booty-less days are behind us. I blame cocaine."-Mortimer
I detest that man who hides one thing in the depths of his heart, and speaks for another. - Homer
That was a very hard winter,
and it was just like one long night,
with me lying awake, waiting and waiting and waiting
for daybreak.
- Black Elk
1881
The wild hawk stood with the down on his beak And stared with his foot on the prey. - Lord Alfred Tennyson

by BlazerFan1 on Sep 11, 2008 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

AHEM. YOU MEAN THE GREAT Steven COLbert!

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No sunni either

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Sep 11, 2008 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since I don't watch either,

I’m not qualified to judge which is the bigger one. But I agree, O’Reilly is a great example of a jackass.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Sep 11, 2008 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

rec

http://www.myspace.com/y5k

by Y5k on Sep 11, 2008 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, it's happened.

Pat Garrity retired. My life has no direction now.

"I think JamesOn is a real smart lil cutie pie." -annthefan, 8/22/2008

Salaam.

by JamesOn on Sep 11, 2008 12:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'll pray for you.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Sep 11, 2008 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Wait wait wait

See if you can snag me some goodies while you’re at it. And don’t forget world peace.

Ok, go ahead.

"I think JamesOn is a real smart lil cutie pie." -annthefan, 8/22/2008

Salaam.

by JamesOn on Sep 11, 2008 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh great Tara, Goddess of Peace and Protection, hear my plea on behalf of JamesOn............

……world peace…………………….cancer…………………………………health care in general …………hunger………………… education …………..Blazers…………Oops………Ummm…….Amen.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Sep 11, 2008 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions