Schedule Breakdown
Here’s the in-depth breakdown of this year’s schedule, month by month. A little analysis follows.
The “vs. Elite” category is versus the top eight teams in the league based on regular season record last year, which were: Boston, Detroit, Orlando, Los Angeles L*kers, New Orleans, San Antonio, Houston, Phoenix, and Utah.
The “vs. Bottom Seven” category includes all teams with fewer than 30 wins last year:
October/November
Total Games: 18
vs. Playoff Teams: 10
vs. Elite: 10
vs. Bottom Seven: 4
vs. East: 5
vs. West 13
Away: 11 (7 vs. playoff teams)
Home: 7
Away Streaks: One- 5 in a row (ORL, MIA, NOH, MIN, GSW)
Back-to-Back: 5 times
Four Games in Five Nights: 1 time
December
Total Games: 14
vs. Playoff Teams: 11
vs. Elite: 5
vs. Bottom Seven: 2
vs. East: 7
vs. West: 7
Away: 6 (5 vs. playoff teams)
Home: 8
Away Streaks: One- 5 in a row (DET, NYK, WAS, BOS, TOR)
Back-to-Back: 2 times
Four Games in Five Nights: None
January
Total Games: 14
vs. Playoff Teams: 7
vs. Elite: 4
vs. Bottom Seven: 2
vs. East: 9
vs. West: 5
Away: 6 (2 vs. playoff teams)
Home: 8
Away Streaks: One- 4 in a row (CHI, PHI, NJN, CHA)
Back-to-Back: 1 time
Four Games in Five Nights: None
February
Total Games: 12
vs. Playoff Teams: 5
vs. Elite: 3
vs. Bottom Seven: 6
vs. East: 2
vs. West: 10
Away: 7 (4 vs. playoff teams)
Home: 5
Away Streaks: None significant
Back-to-Back: 2 times
Four Games in Five Nights: None
March
Total Games: 16
vs. Playoff Teams: 9
vs. Elite: 4
vs. Bottom Seven: 4
vs. East: 7
vs. West: 9
Away: 6 (3 vs. playoff teams)
Home: 10
Away Streaks: One- 5 in a row (ATL, MEM,
Back-to-Back: 3 times
Four Games in Five Nights: 1 time
April
Total Games: 8
vs. Playoff Teams: 4
vs. Elite: 3
vs. Bottom Seven: 4
vs. East: 0
vs. West: 8
Away: 5 (2 vs. playoff teams)
Home: 3
Away Streaks: One- 4 in a row (OKC, HOU, MEM, SAS)
Back-to-Back: 2 times
Four Games in Five Nights: 1 time
Highest Percentage of Games vs. Playoff Teams: December (11 of 14)
Highest Percentage of Games vs. Elite Teams: October/November (10 of 18)
Highest Percentage of Games vs. Bottom Seven: February (6 of 12) and April (4 of 8)
Longest Road Trip: 5 games, three times (October/November, December, and March)
Highest Percentage of Away Games: October/November (11 of 18) and April (5 of 8)
Highest Percentage of Away Games vs. Playoff Teams: December (5 of 6)
Total Back-to-Back Scenarios: 15
Total Four Games in Five Nights Scenarios: 3
Clearly October/November is the toughest month of the season from multiple perspectives. We play elite teams 10 times in that span and only 19 times the entire rest of the season. 7 of our 11 away games are against elite teams. We play more road games that month than in any other. One-third of our back-to-back outings are in that month alone, plus one of our four-games-in-five-nights stretches. It’s going to be a rough start to the season.
December gets somewhat better, although 11 of 14 total games are against last year’s playoff teams. We face 5 of those playoff opponents on the road, the most of any month except the one prior. We don’t have as many total road games nor do we face as many elite teams overall as we did in October/November. We don’t get many bottom feeders either though. The five-game swing including
In January things start looking up. Only half the games are against playoff opponents. Only a quarter are against elite opponents. The home/away schedule is balanced too. The longest road trip is four games, it contains only one modest playoff team, and there’s only one set of back-to-back games. Only two road games total are against playoff teams.
February is even brighter. Half of our games are against the bottom seven. Only 3 of the 12 total are against elite teams. The road trips are short…nothing grueling.
March brings the most home games of the season. Half of the games are against middling opponents--neither great nor awful. We have one long road trip and three back-to-backs. If we’ve gained momentum in the new year this month will likely make or break us.
There’s no middle ground in April…it’s either very good opponents or lousy ones. The only thing close to a tweener is
Basically, as we’ve all said, this year will be all about surviving the initial crap storm and then making the most out of the lighter schedule in the middle months. We don’t have to come through December unscathed but we do have to come through with confidence and at least a few wins under our belts. I’d say we need to find 12 or so wins before 2009 to be comfortable.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
1 recs |
43 comments
Comments
Good breakdown Dave, but I think we really need to be better than 12-20 come December 31st
It takes an 8 game winning streak to get back to five hundred? In the West, that’s trouble. I guess time will tell.
Krikey! Kiteboarding is Kewl!
by prezofdeath on
Aug 7, 2008 12:32 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm guessing it won't take 50 wins
to get a playoff spot this year. The middle of the West seems mushier than it was last year. Also I see the potential for the Blazers to go on some major tears from January through March IF they keep their wits and confidence about them through the tough times.
—Dave
by Dave on
Aug 7, 2008 12:38 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So you're saying
Through the Fire and the Flames should be our new theme song?
Krikey! Kiteboarding is Kewl!
by prezofdeath on
Aug 7, 2008 9:49 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
12-20
Would be tough for us fans to handle. I don’t think my heart could take it. But I agree that it wont take 50 wins to make the post season. I’ve never seen that happen in any conference before, so I don’t think it will become a rule. And like you said, the middle of the west looks mushier than last season. My guess is 45 gets you in, and Blazers get a sixth seed if they can make the 50 win mark.
by MattyDread on
Aug 7, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We've got to...
...make hay in January and February, and sustain it through March. We really need 27-30 wins combined in those 3 months. If we can do that after surviving December with 12-14 wins, that puts a playoff spot firmly in our sights heading into the final 8 games.
Rule #1 of nitpicking is to get it right.
by douglast on
Aug 7, 2008 12:38 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Maybe Schedule Analysis...
It maybe that Schedule analysis is just something I don’t get into very much. But it seems this season that it’s that much more difficult this far out. So much of how good The Blazers might be at any given point in the season from start to finish hinges on so many, at this point, unpredictable factors. Improvement of Brandon and Aldridge, how well Oden fits in and contributes and how quickly. Gelling of entire team with additions of Bayless and Rudy. Plus all the usual factors that affect everyone like health and injury. Looking at a schedule and the opponents can be daunting, but I’d hope The Blazers approach every single game as a game they feel they can win. I think you grab a schedule this early and start penciling in wins and losses and you are in danger of missing the forest for the trees. Again maybe that’s just me, but I like looking at each game as it approaches. I’ve also found that each season usually becomes like a living thing as it unfolds. All the forecasting in the world probably won’t reveal what actually does happen. We are going to amazingly look great and win games almost everyone thinks we will lose as well as we probably will have some games we should win and we drop a clunker. Such is the nature of a talented young team still on the rise. So for me, I just look at a schedule as the thing that tells me who I hope we beat on what day.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
by Krang on
Aug 7, 2008 1:05 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree
that penciling in wins and losses is pretty much a “for amusement only” effort at this point. We don’t even know what our rotation will look like, how healthy Oden will be, or a ton of other stuff. However it’s legitimate to look at trends and to draw from past experience, such as:
-Road games will be tougher to win in general than home games
-Elite teams will be tougher to beat on average than other teams
—Long road trips and back-to-back games can be trouble
Therefore you can draw some pretty good generalities about what stretches of the season are likely to be easier or harder. I’d stop way short of saying, “We’re going to have ‘X’ number of wins at this point” though.
—Dave
by Dave on
Aug 7, 2008 1:11 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Part of the difficulty with that
is who will be elite. Did anyone know N.O. or the L@kers would be elite last year? Some may have projected that, but it was by no means certain.
If Wade is healthy and their rookies pan out, will Miami be a bottom 7 team?
Are the Spurs still elite, or does age finally catch up with them? If they are still elite, is it correct to consider them as elite in the first half of the season, since they are notoriously slow starters?
Are the new look Clippers a bottom seven team? I could see them with 25 wins. I could see them with 45-50. I expect them to be somewhere between that, maybe 35-40 wins, but not bottom 7.
It’s still a decent way to look at things, of course, but like every other kind of projected analysis, there is so much uncertainty that there are more questions than answers.
Other people don't have as much practice at being wrong as I do -- HT, timbo
by jscot on
Aug 7, 2008 2:31 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not just WHO will be elite, but WHEN.
For example, I expect the Bulls, Nets, Bucks, and Knicks to be much better at season’s end than at the beginning;
they’ve got some roster overhauls and new coaches that should pay off some day, just not in game 1 this year.
And young teams (like us) have the capacity to overreact to positive momentum;
if they’re any good, they get rolling like New Orleans did last year.
That’s part of why I think the Bulls and Nets get better as the season goes on,
but throw in Sacramento, maybe Memphis, Minnesota, and OKC in the West,
and Indiana and Toronto in the East (Atlanta was on track for this, but that’s probably been defused).
And who gets easier to play as the season wears on? Who falls apart?
Look at how Dallas lost their steam last year. especially after the Kidd trade,
or look at how much better it was to play Houston in April than in February.
The 06-07 defending champion Heat are the role model for this, of course.
Harder to say who’s in a position to do that this year, but bet on the old, the injury-prone,
and the chemistry-challenged (like Portland in 2000-2001); Phoenix, San Antonio, Denver, and the Clips come to mind.
And then there are the teams that could go either way, teams that have some serious expectations,
but if they stumble at all, they’re likely to go south in a hurry, like we did in 2001.
Houston is the poster child for this, but include Washington, Dallas, Boston, and ESPECIALLY the L[xxx]rs.
Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.
by QualityPie on
Aug 7, 2008 9:06 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I have us win 14 before 2009, and it still might not be enough to make the playoffs
Originally I guessed Oden, Rudy, Bayless would be good for an additional 9 wins. Now I’m not so sure after going through this schedule, as posted in prezofdeath’s schedule prediction. See my “Good Case” Google Doc here. 44 – 38.
Agreed that it’s a crapshoot because you wish we could win certain games when you know it can go either way, and we are still months away from even knowing opening day rosters.
Odenied: Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...
by Norsktroll on
Aug 7, 2008 1:52 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
great analisis
i would like to see this template laid over the elite 8, 2 tired 2 do it myself right no, maybee l8r
"If I was in anyway unclear, I am implying that Dave is a serial murderer."
---jonestr on Aug 3, 2008 12:25 AM PDT
Email Dave,
--- Mortimer --- for Blazers Edge Ambassador to the SBNations
by ptwnblzr on
Aug 7, 2008 2:08 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The thing about the schedule is...
We’re in a situation we haven’t been for a long time. We weren’t in it last year. It is simply this.
The schedule doesn’t really matter anymore. When and where we play elite teams doesn’t matter anymore.
What matters is how close we come to realizing our potential. If we play anywhere near our potential, we will win a lot LOT of games. We will win a good share of road games, and of games against playoff teams, and a respectable number of games against elite teams. And we will be one of the elite teams ourselves.
If youth/injuries/chemistry/etc. keep us from playing near our potential, we will lose games, maybe quite a few. Probably not as many as we win, and we still might squeak into the playoffs.
But the question is not really about who we play when or where this year. Those days are past. The question is about how we play. That is the only thing that matters, now.
Other people don't have as much practice at being wrong as I do -- HT, timbo
by jscot on
Aug 7, 2008 2:45 AM PDT
reply
actions
1 recs
I like that attitude
It’s about the Blazers more than the other teams.
by rburg on
Aug 7, 2008 8:13 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
However, our ability to really make an avalanche run at our potential may begin next year.
Think of this year as the slow rumbling. It’s not about the wins or losses, but how we win, how we lose, and how we learn, respond, react from that.
The mountain is shaking this year… rocks will be tumbling… next year, it won’t matter who we play. If we’re healthy it’s ALL on us. This year it’s all about getting the right rocks rolling down the hill so that NOTHING can stop the act of nature that is the blazers once that momentum kicks in.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on
Aug 7, 2008 8:20 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the point is
that the avalanche needs to quicken after every game… tighten up… become leaner stronger faster and bouncier.
We may falter a little from exhaustion at the end of the season (GREG) but that will be the eye of the hurricane because after that and next season the scoring will pour like rain from the heavens.
mmm delicious victories.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on
Aug 7, 2008 8:22 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm offended, my grandfather wall killed by a renegade avalanche.
"The only difference between a good shot and a bad shot is if it goes in or not." - Charles Barkley
by tominhawaii on
Aug 7, 2008 8:57 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i'm sorry your wall was killed.
good luck building a big daddy wall.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on
Aug 9, 2008 7:47 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree..
As I said above, I’m not into schedule prognastication this early out. I agree though. Of course you look at the schedule and given past knowledge and current knowledge you can make thumbnail predictions about the difficulty of a stretch or a game. But I agree. The Blazers a young team still on the rise have reached a level where I think you have to believe we can compete against anyone, anytime, anywhere. There were times a few seasons ago when I could look at a game or matchup and think that even if we played our best and the opponent played below potential we probably still were going to lose. Now if we play near our potential? You have to believe we can compete or beat anyone. That’s nice. But makes predicition almost impossible.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
by Krang on
Aug 7, 2008 9:54 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I actually like the schedule.
It’s tough up front. We have a team that can do well in the face of adversity. It builds character. They’ve been here and while it’s tough, I think they can do it. It then starts to ease up and lets us gain momentum.
Additionally, good teams are good to play at the beginning of the year because they shake off rust and they realize it’s a marathon, not a sprint. We won’t realize that and we’ll play hard. When exhaustion is kicking in at the end of the season, we’ll be playing easier teams.
It’s harsh, but I can live with this schedule. the blazers will either rise together or fade off into the night and I think the character of this team is that they’ll rise to the challenge.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on
Aug 7, 2008 8:25 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That observation...
...passed into my mind as well. A lot of people are down on how difficult our schedule seems right out of the gate however given McMillans skill at getting the team prepared and our youth perhaps it is good for us to be forced to focus early and play some tough teams right at the start. I think this season schedule, the additions of Bayless, Rudy and Oden make this pre-season and training camp perhaps as important as any we’ve ever had. Originally I didn’t want the players reporting too early but I now feel it’s important we be as “together” as possible heading into the season. Odens onboard, and the league knows it and wants to promote him. We’ve lost the advantage of sneak attack. All teams are going to be looking to beat the young phenoms. We need to be ready.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
by Krang on
Aug 7, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
agreed
they’re going to be worn out by seasons end… but I still like the schedule because it builds toughness.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on
Aug 9, 2008 7:47 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't think the monthly separations help the breakdown.
Switching from the 31st to the 1st is no different for the Blazers than going from the 12th to the 13th.
Heck, it’s LESS of a change, really.
The biggest switches in the nature of the sked occur mid-month, with the biggest one being in December;
after that murderous stretch of October 28 through December 12 (25 games in 46 days, 9 home, 16 away,
7 back-to-backs with travel, but no travel day) ending with the home end of a road/home back-to-back,
they have two home games in the next 10 days to kick off a stretch of 9 out of 11 at home in 29 days.
So to finish that rough first month and a half, on the night of December 12,
the buzzer sounds for the end of the Warriors game, they trudge down the tunnel to their home locker room,
and they stay home (playing only TWO GAMES!) until the 22nd, when they do a one-off in Denver.
They don’t see another road trip until a month later, on January 12 (they do have one other road one-off,
at the L[xxx]rs on January 4, with a travel day before it and two travel days after).
Then, on the twelfth, they slip into a cycle of road-trip/home-stand that lasts all season long.
The twelfth of the month is generally a big deal, breakwise.
There are those two huge changes on December 12 and January 12,
and then February 12 is the last game before the all-star break.
And in March, the 13th is the end of 6-of-7-at-home; after that is a road trip that is
their only one after that mad start to have a) five games, and b) travel east of Memphis.
And, of course, the 15th is the end of the season.
So if you wanna break it down into months, do it mid-month to mid-month.
Much more meaningful that way.
Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.
by QualityPie on
Aug 7, 2008 8:49 AM PDT
reply
actions
1 recs
Sorry, there was a bad fact there.
And in March, the 13th is the end of 6-of-7-at-home; after that is a road trip that is
their only one after that mad start to have a) five games, and b) travel east of Memphis.
Actually, it’s their only time east of Memphis, and their only 5-game trip,
after January 17 (NOT the mad start that runs up to December 12, as I implied).
After January 17, they have five road trips, four of which are only to the Texas/Memphis/OKC area;
three of THOSE redneck roadies are three-game swings.
That’s big.
After January 17, except for that March tour, road trips will be purely
hops to the Texas area for 3 games, MAYBE 4, in, like, 5 days.
And the homestands alternating with those trips are that Dec.13-Jan12 creampuff stretch I mentioned,
5 of 6 at home, 5 of 6 at home (in an 18-day stretch, with the All-Star break in the middle!),
6 of 7 at home, 4 at home, and 3 of 4 at home.
Or in other words, once we start alternating road trips with home stands in January,
the homestands are consistently far bigger in scope than the road trips are.
__
You know, it may be folly to forecast an actual RECORD based on the schedule,
but how about a difference between the pre-December-13 record and the post-December-12 record?
How much better should our record for the last 56 games be than our record for the first 25 games?
That’s a totally fair expectation.
I’d say 200 percentage points is totally sane; whether it’s .350 vs .550, .300 vs .500, .400 vs .600—who knows?
But that overall DIFFERENCE seems about right.
Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.
by QualityPie on
Aug 7, 2008 9:25 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I love Mike Barrett's "Saving Private Ryan" comparison
If we survive the first eight weeks, the rest will feel easy (well, apart from when it really counts in April maybe).
Odenied: Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...
by Norsktroll on
Aug 7, 2008 9:04 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
the new schedule just reminded me that....
since I’m a Directv subscriber and they’re obviously too stupid to get a deal done with comcast, that I’ll probably be screwed out of yet another year of watching the games. I just hope my neighbor is nice enough to leave his blinds open so i can peek in while he watches the games just like last year!
GO BLAZERS!
by kikifromdowntown on
Aug 7, 2008 9:17 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The rumors are flyin
that deal will be getting done
"There something going on with that Skipper. No one gets that fat eating coconuts"
by 92wastheyear on
Aug 7, 2008 5:30 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
anybody know where to get
the blazers wallpaper schedule?
Oden...Aldridge...Roy.....THE REAL BIG THREE
by CroRupt on
Aug 7, 2008 9:19 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Looking over the sked some more, something caught my eye.
We visit the Texas-area teams (including Memphis, OKC and the Hairnets) in road trips,
but the rest of the Western conference? No real “road trips” to speak of. Not ONE!
Consider:
- October 28 stand-alone at the L[xxx]rs.
- November Phoenix/Utah pair (four days apart, on the first and fifth).
- Odd Golden State game: At the end of a four-game gulf-area/Minny road trip,
but with two days off before the Worriers game. Is it part of that trip? Maybe.
- Sac/Phoenix pair (no travel day), with only a single home game after the Worriers road game and this pair.
Is the Pyrite State game part of THIS, as a 3-of-4-in-5-days “road trip”? Again, maybe.
- December 11 standalone at Utah.
- December 22 standalone at Denver, as part of a home-and-away back-to-back.
BUT! – Denver is the opponent for BOTH games, so it’s THEIR H&A B2B, too.
- January 4 standalone at the L[xxx]rs. Travel day before, TWO travel days after.
- January 26 standalone at the Paper Clips.
- February 12 standalone at Pyrite State.
- March 5 standalone at Denver.
- April 11 standalone against the Paper Clips.
Weird, huh? No three-or-more games in a row anywhere west of the Rockies.
Mostly one-offs, plus a couple of pairs and that one Worriers game; how THAT relates to
the four road games before it and the Sac/PHX pair soon after, is the only real aberration to this rule.
Six road games in Los Angeles and Denver = six one-game flybys.
Interesting.
Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.
by QualityPie on
Aug 7, 2008 11:11 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Crazy Pills
Please don’t tell me you Blazers fans think you’re getting 50 wins this year? Bring the Crazy Pills to True Bue Jazz and we’ll show you what 72 wins looks like!
by CB Jack on
Aug 7, 2008 11:12 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
More like 50-55.
You can have all the crazy pills you want, I wouldn’t want you to go into withdrawal and steal the bumper off my car to sell for more of them.
by TimG on
Aug 7, 2008 11:51 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I dunno if we'll win 50
BUT is it that outlandish?
We won 41 games last season. We’re adding GREG ODEN, a once in a decade #1 pick. Normal #1 picks, on average, add about 10 wins to a team. Adding an extremely special #1 pick who also happens to address huge weaknesses for his team could, without being outlandish, add 9 wins to a mediocre team.
Plus Roy will be entering his 3rd season, also LMA—that’s often the biggest jump-year for good NBAers.
Rudy, Bayless, Martell, Outlaw, Frye, all young guys who either project to be good or played well last year. All should improve.
Is 9 wins worth crazy pills? I doubt that very much.
OBVIOUSLY there are question marks: Is Oden okay? How ready are Bayless and Rudy? But Oden does appear to be very healthy, and he’s a monster—and the other two are just solidifying the bench for this season.
This is a good, young team that could win 50 if Oden is Oden and no one regresses. They work too hard to seriously regress.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
Aug 7, 2008 2:15 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
LOL
72 wins? Sounds like you don’t need us to bring crazy pills over there, you’ve already OD’ed.
I forget, exactly, how many times did the Jazz beat us last year? It’s just kind of slipping my memory, being old and all. But it seems to me you might have had the #1 seed if you had known how to beat us.
Should be a good contest this year, looking forward to it.
Other people don't have as much practice at being wrong as I do -- HT, timbo
by jscot on
Aug 8, 2008 2:22 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the Schonz is forecasting a tumultuous start.
This took longer to compile than I anticipated…
The “Elite” Teams’ records through November last year are as follows:
Boston 13-2, 7 road games, 1-1 against “Elite” teams
Detroit 9-5, 8 road games, 1-2 against “Elite” teams
Orlando 14-4, 11 road games, 2-4 against “Elite” teams
L@kers 9-7, 7 road games, 4-5 against “Elite” teams
New Orleans 11-6, 10 road games, 1-3 against “Elite” teams
San Antonio 14-3, 8 road games, 4-1 against “Elite” teams
Houston 9-8, 10 road games, 4-3 against “Elite” teams
Phoenix 12-4, 8 road games, 3-2 against “Elite” teams
Utah 12-5, 9 road games, 3-2 against “Elite” teams
Our schedule through November has 11 of 18 games on the road, and 10 of the 18 games against “Elite” teams, and only 3 (!) of those 10 are at home. Of the “Elite” teams, only the L@kers and Houston “stumbled” out of the gate a bit last year, but those two teams did play the most “Elite” teams.
My point of this was to find which “Elite” teams started slow last year so that I could… you know, justify us stealing a win or two here and there from teams still sleeping. My analysis proved otherwise. We’re in trouble. The Blazers will be fortunate to be 7-11 after November. Reaching 50 will require strong desire and some serious regrouping.
By the way, Dave, your Elite Eight actually has nine teams.
Ba da da da dah... I'm BEdgin' it!
by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on
Aug 7, 2008 12:53 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
One more weirdness in the schedule:
In our first first 14 games, we have only 4 homes games.
We’re also on nationwide TV 4 times in that stretch.
And three of those four TV games are home games.
We may rarely be at home before November 23, but when we are, THAT’S when we get the national TV.
Of our 10 road games, they’re televising only our season debut at the L[xxx]rs,
but of our few home games, only the Minnesota game is locals-only.
Oddness.
Shine a spotlight on the Rose Garden this fall.
Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.
by QualityPie on
Aug 7, 2008 2:24 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I refuse to guess which games we will lose.
It’s the fans of other teams that should be going through their schedules and penciling-in losses whenever their teams play the Blazers.
Quality Pie, thank you very much for replacing your avatar. It was giving me nightmares.
Asked his specialty in the kitchen, Oden paused and said, "Hamburger Helper and tuna fish."
by MiledAnimal on
Aug 7, 2008 2:50 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You're welcome.
Heh.
Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.
by QualityPie on
Aug 7, 2008 3:00 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wins are not what I care about this year.
Wow! I have had high expectations for this team. Even this year. But this scedule is really a tough one. Looking at the number of road games (against teams that are currently a little bit better than us), and the number of back-to-backs, I’d be thrilled if the Blazers win 10 or 11 of the first 24.
If they do that, I think they will be able to play .600 ball the rest of the season and make the playoffs.
I hope fans are going to be able to enjoy watching this soon-to-be-great team devolop this year, and not be to dissapointed with more loses than most people here are predicting. (I think there will be a lot of 2 to 5 point loses). I will not mind though, because this team is going to win “BIG” in the future. (probably starting next year) and for many years after that.
I see three or four rings in the next eight years. But they will need this year to learn, grow, and become a team that can win when hunted. (nobody is going to overlook or underestimate the Blazers anymore) in fact teams will get pumped up to play us from now on.
I, for one, am really happy to have a group of good guys to root for. No matter how they do record wise this year, it is going to be an exciting team that Oregon can be proud of.
Big thank you to Paul and KP, from a life-long Blazer fan.
by Rick D. on
Aug 7, 2008 2:58 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
On the Bright Side...
Portland plays an opponent that is finishing up a Back-to-Back 27 times. That is a nice little advantage compared to our 15 Back-to-Backs…plus in 7 of our 15 Back-to-Backs (second games), our opponent is also finishing up a Back-to-Back.
Playing opponents finishing up a Back-to-Back by month: Nov – 4 times, Dec. – 5, Jan. – 4, Feb – 3, March – 8!, and April – 3.
Every little advantage helps
by PoleAx on
Aug 7, 2008 5:09 PM PDT
reply
actions
4 recs
I shudder at the research it took
to come up with that. I completely bow to you. We’re not worthy.
—Dave
by Dave on
Aug 7, 2008 8:44 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll not only bow
I’ll rec it.
Other people don't have as much practice at being wrong as I do -- HT, timbo
by jscot on
Aug 8, 2008 2:24 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've scheduled a breakdown when I turn 50.
I’m going to buy a corvette, get a divorce, and ask out BlazerFan3.0. I’ll want the latest model corvette and BlazerFan.
"The only difference between a good shot and a bad shot is if it goes in or not." - Charles Barkley
by tominhawaii on
Aug 8, 2008 6:39 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
50 is like the day after tomorrow for you
BlazerFan1.0 is still a low mileage model
PS Sophia….look!! I called you a model. :)
"There something going on with that Skipper. No one gets that fat eating coconuts"
by 92wastheyear on
Aug 8, 2008 7:20 PM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My first thought is that a tough opening schedule...
... may be just what the doctor ordered.
I want to see this team tested early. I can see them coming together that much faster under the pressure of a tough early schedule. 15 wins minimum by the end of December.
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.
........Thomas Jefferson
The most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the
government and I'm here to help.' "
- Ronald Reagan
by timg56 on
Aug 11, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs

















