Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Race to the Roses & BCS Bowl Predictions

Sergio

Having been through the draft, the Olympics, Summer League, endless talk about the newcomers, and having chatted about most every other player on the roster it's time to revisit one of the semi-forgotten guys in the mix:  Sergio Rodriguez.

I'm going to be as candid here as I've been on the podcast and radio when this has come up.  It doesn't feel like the winds are blowing in a great direction for Sergio right now.  Last season was obviously shaky for him.  His confidence may or may not have taken a hit.  The weaknesses in his game may or may not have been exposed.  It's hard to say exactly what went on there, or if it was a combination of things.  We just know it didn't work.  He wasn't selected for Spain's Olympic team this summer.  He didn't participate in Summer League.  With Jerryd Bayless bringing a Jack-like scoring game without as many of Jarrett's weaknesses, Sergio could get stuck in the role of third point guard again.  That isn't exactly a blueprint for a fast-ascending career.

On the other hand none of the above data is anywhere near conclusive.  It looks shaky for him, but circumstantially so.  Players are entitled to have a rough sophomore season.  That has happened to plenty of guys and some have rebounded to have nice careers.  If you step back and analyze the Sergio-meter so far (at least according to the fans) you'd say he had minimal expectations coming into the league and exceeded them with his flashes of brilliance.  This led to much higher expectations for his second year which he didn't meet.  When the meter oscillates that violently it usually means the truth is somewhere in the middle.  Plus even though Bayless poses a real threat to Sergio's potential minutes they're not at all the same kind of guard.  In fact they're dead opposite in many ways.  It's not like Nate is going to see Jerryd as an acceptable substitute if he needs a Sergio.  The door is open still.

What will Sergio need to do to kick the door fully open and walk through it and into the rotation?  Here's the list:

1.  He needs to come into training camp in incredible shape and ready to go.  It's not so much that this is a weakness for him, but the "new leaf" psychology is operative here and this is a prime symbol of it.  This is how you show the coaches on Day One that you're serious.

2.  He needs to demonstrate that he has honed both his skills and his mental approach.  Remember last year when Mike Barrett and Jason Quick started writing very early on about Joel Przybilla and how we were going to notice a marked difference in his free throw shooting?  We need to hear whispers that Sergio is going to surprise us this year.  We need to hear how much better his shot looks.  We need to hear how he's focused on the coaches like a laser and he seems to be able to anticipate what they want to see out of him and the offense instead of just responding to it.  We need to hear about his all-out, two-way hustle.

3.  He needs to make friends with Greg Oden.  You have noticed that Greg Oden can dunk, right?  You may have also noticed that any alley-oop south of the utter top of the backboard he's going to catch and throw down.  Who's the most likely candidate on the team to be throwing those alley-oops?  Greg Oden is a possible lifeline for Sergio.  Besides the dunks, Sergio also needs to make darn sure he can throw an excellent, basic pass into the post.  He needs to know what to do after he's made that pass as well, including (as we mentioned above) being a threat to hit the shot if it's passed back.

4.  He needs to play with his usual abandon on the break.  Everybody with eyes is betting this team will start to run more in the near future.  We may not be at full throttle this season but we should be in first gear at least and shifting towards second.  Lamarcus Aldridge, Rudy Fernandez, Oden, Bayless...these guys can charge.  The Blazers have nobody better than Sergio to lead in a running offense.  There's not even a close second.

5.  He needs to be prepared to produce big in small minutes.  Barring injury he's not going to pull 20 mpg without proving himself first.  He doesn't have the luxury of ramping up slowly when he gets inserted.  This is not to say he has to spaz out or break the offense when he comes in.  That'll just get him benched again.  But if he has an open shot he has to take it and hit it.  If he has a lane he must drive it.  If he has the ball he has to push it up now, not three plays from now.  This is the reality of life off the bench in the NBA.  The league is full of guys who could probably put up respectable numbers if they were just granted 25 minutes to do it, but we never see them because they can't give that same production in practice and for 5 minutes in a game.

6.  Speaking of practice...every one of those is like his NBA Finals.  I don't know how he's used to practicing or what his habits are, but they need to be exemplary all year long.  He has got to find every edge he can to win that time.  You know Bayless isn't going to back down from a challenge.  You know Blake is reliable whether he practices well or not.  That means Sergio needs to be a star during rehearsal to gain ground.  Nate has remarked about a couple relatively obscure players in the past pretty much forcing him to play them by the way they worked out.  That needs to be Sergio this year.

Note that none of these half-dozen items involves Sergio being somebody he's not.  We didn't try to turn him into a lock-down defender.  We didn't say a peep about the turnovers.  I believe Sergio can play his game and make it in the NBA without having his flaws submarine him.  But because his game is not complete--or at least not complete yet--he's going to have to do these other things well.

Were I to summarize Sergio's potential future with the Blazers right now I'd say not to bet on him, but don't sleep on him either.  We ought to get signs fairly early on which way things are going to go.  Hearing positive things about him would be a big plus, showing not only an improved game but an advantageous attitude as well.  Not hearing about him at all would probably be a discouraging sign considering that he needs to shine in order to advance.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

0 recs  |  Comment 106 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Curious

You say Sergio doesn’t have to transform himself into something he’s not, but I kind of disagree. You briefly touched on it in the section where you mention that he needs to “make friends” with Greg; Sergio absolutely needs to be a threat to hit open shots, and to wit, that would be transforming himself into something he is not — a reliable shooter.

I’m not rooting for Sergio to fail by any means, but neither am I going to hold my breath hoping for anything extraordinary out of him, mostly I’ve “moved on” mentally; we’ve got 4 guards ahead of him that are primed to make an impact and frankly I’m more excited to see what they can do.

by nikolokolus on Aug 29, 2008 12:06 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That's not a transformation of his game style, though

That was Dave’s point.

Other people don't have as much practice at being wrong as I do -- HT, timbo

by jscot on Aug 29, 2008 1:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess I disagree to an extent

Sergio’s mechanics are so awful that actually shooting with arc in a game situation is kind of like starting from scratch. Maybe I’m overstating the significance of what it takes to break down and rebuild a shot (there’s a lot of muscle memory to rewire here) but to me this is kind of a “style” change.

by nikolokolus on Aug 29, 2008 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sergio and Rudy

Are gonna tear it up together this year. Just you wait and see.
Oh! Lunch time!

"It's how you play the Ga-ame..." - Greg Oden with Justin Timeberlake at the Espy's

by BlazermaniacAndy on Aug 29, 2008 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sergio is an interesting case

Most everything Sergio related recently can be taken two ways:

Talks for 2 hours in exit interview-
A. He needed a long time have want he needed to do drilled into his skull
B. He was genuinely trying to cover all bases on what he need to do during the summer

Appeared to get angry/sad when questioned by Spanish media about his playing time-
A. He hates Nate and feels he deserves time
B. He feels very passionately about basketball and at least he isn’t pulling a Jason Williams were he is glad to be bounced from the playoffs.

Didn’t come over for summer league-
A. Doesn’t want to do the little things to make it into the rotation
B. I find this perplexing. Why does he need to be at summer league? Does he have to fly halfway around the world from his home so he can be that practice dummy for Rex and Kopenen? Its not like he was going to get PT at the PG spot, and no one wants to see him play SG.

Didn’t make the Spanish national team:
A. He’s in the NBA, he should make it.
B. Spain’s team is really good, its no shame not to make it. And really, he isn’t the type of PG you want at the end of bench to play spot minutes. He needs run to get a rhythm (I think every one can agree with that), and in he didn’t play well last year and his confidence is shot, thats three strikes.

Potential, potential, potential. Sergio has it and Taurean Green doesn’t.

Joel Freeland=Stud

by hightide on Aug 29, 2008 12:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yah

That ambiguity is something that I was trying to get at too. The only exception is Summer League. The reason he needed to be at Summer League if there was any chance the Blazers would take him for their team was to tear that joint up. I don’t know if it was Sergio’s decision or the team’s decision not to have him there but either way he could have benefitted from the exposure…to his own coaches if nothing else. If the Blazers wanted him there but he didn’t come that was not a great career choice. If the Blazers said, “We know everything we need to know about you already” considering how last year went that’s not a comforting sign either.

—Dave

by Dave on Aug 29, 2008 12:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hate to say it

And go against the all powerful Dave, but I still disagree. Sure, it would have been “nice”, but is it really a missed opportunity? He can’t get any time at the point with Bayless and Kopenen there, so I would assume he would get no PT since he’s not a shooter (though Wheels said it looked better at practice this week). And Sergio is at Portland now, getting his time in with the coaches while most NBA players are getting in their last vacation time in (though not our beloved Blazers).

 Maybe Casey can fill us in on whether it was Sergio’s decision or the teams (I vaguely recall reading somewhere that the Blazers were disappointed that Sergio decided not to come to summer league).

Joel Freeland=Stud

by hightide on Aug 29, 2008 1:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sergio woulda' played over PetKo

And played alongside Bayless.

I see no reason why Sergio couldn’t have played in Summer League after the sort of season he had. He didn’t put anyone’s worries to rest with how he played and needed to show at least ONCE he can run a team in extended minutes. Where better than Summer League, where quick flashy guards shine?

I thought I had read that the Blazers asked him to and he said he didn’t wanna. Being nice, they sent out the shooting coach. If that is true, I don’t like it very much. I’m glad he’s in Portland now, but he needs minutes running a team in actual games.

A young guard could use summer league for many reasons. Since he is on the team, he takes precedence over Petko, and I’d hope he’d outplay Petko in practice and in the games. Yeah, it’s nice Kopper got plenty of PG run, but he isn’t making the team so it shoulda’ been Sergio. Kopponen, while intriguing, would take a backseat to Sergio just like Freeland did for LMA.

Sergio is not at a point where we know what we got, and thus summer league is a waste. He needs to prove his worth.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Aug 29, 2008 7:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I not sure about that

Who do you play?

A player who needs to be signed right away, and failed as a SG last year at summer league and has no NBA exprience.

A just drafted rookie PG/SG (but who would play exclusively at PG) that could use some run not only to help plan the rotation for the upcoming year, but who can also help drum up interest in the Blazers and sell tickets.

Or do you let the 3rd string (3rd year) PG prove that he can run a team for 30 minutes a game? In games that, quite frankly, have lower level competition than the monthish of pre-training camp scrimmages that he will be attending with his teammates? Sergio is bad enough that it would be nice to see him get some run at summer league, but Koponen and Bayless were priorities #1-#2, whose play helped not only themselves, but the Blazer’s ability to make the best long-term decisions.

Joel Freeland=Stud

by hightide on Aug 30, 2008 4:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You forgot Martell.

      He can run, and jump. Athletically speaking !

    COINCAST/DIRECTV/CHARTER = 3 MONKEYS
         BRING BACK OUR BLAZERS TO SO. OREGON !!!

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Aug 29, 2008 12:47 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I WANT TO RUN

and thus, Sergio gets minutes on my team. I love the other guys on this team, and I think they’ll be better overall players, but Sergio is the best pure point guard on this team. If he does the things you outlined Dave, he should be the one getting the extension not Blake (3 Million Less). The whole thing will come down to whether his shot can improve or not. We see Sergio’s potential every game with the Raptors. If Jose Calderon could come around, especially shooting the ball, theres no reason Sergio can’t. Sergio is leaps and bounds better than Calderon was at this point in his career. We all saw the articles about potentially getting Calderon last season, and partially this offseason. I honestly don’t think Nate is willing to give Sergio the kind of PT he’ll need to prove himself. That most likely means he’ll be among the next off the island, but I don’t think it’ll be his fault.

In another thread I did a break down of Sergio’s minutes, and how well over 90% of those minutes came with Jarrett Jack as the teams SG. In comparison, he was on the court with Roy for under 10% of his minutes. If that isn’t a recipe for failure, I don’t know what is.

The basics about why you keep him:
1. You want to run
2. He’s our best passer
3. He gets people in their groove (most unselfish player on the team)
4. Chemistry and kinship with Rudy
5. His ceiling is higher than Blake’s (by a lot)

by as11osu on Aug 29, 2008 1:32 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

As stated in the "Could the love come back" post, I guess Sergio will be gone soon if Bayless is no failure on PG

http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/8/23/598720/could-the-love-come-back#8286853

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Aug 29, 2008 1:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

3. He needs to make friends with Greg Oden

No dah. Ever since the reports that he was working out with the shooting coach I’ve been thinking lobfest-meister as an ideal role for Sergio. Sometimes you want to telegraph the game plan to the opposition. Game plan? When Sergio comes into the game, his role is to lob it to Oden. You want everyone to know this is his role and that this is really the only primary option, as it leaves the opponent with a dilemma:

a. Most teams either they have to play their three biggest gorillas on Greg, leaving their two remaining pip squeaks to play 2-on-4 defense against Aldridge-Roy-Sergio-whomever else is in the game for the Blazers.

Or the rock is going into the hole about at an 80% or so clip. (As an aside, recalling that Greg can hit free throws, and there will likely be some…uh…contact from time to time, so the actual scoring rate will effectively be higher.)

Choose your poison. This plan depends critically on Sergio being able to consistently hit an open shot when available, or it becomes 2-on-3 defense.

by jaywalker on Aug 29, 2008 3:58 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't we trade away all of Greg Oden's friends (Green, McBob)?

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Aug 29, 2008 4:14 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I was sure that I read somewhere

that Sergio was going to come over in mid-August to start working, but I haven’t seen a word about it lately (and I cannot find the original post/news either.) It’s way past mid-August …

by jorga on Aug 29, 2008 6:00 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He is in Portland, see the fanpost about the five on five scrimmages

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Aug 29, 2008 6:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

I’ve gotten behind in reading fanposts. … Maybe because just now when I started that one it went OT almost immediately and I don’t have time to read everyone’s bantering. I just wish all the junk would stay in the junk drawer….

by jorga on Aug 29, 2008 7:43 AM PDT up reply actions   3 recs

Preach on Sista!

I’m totally with you.

Free Sergio! http://www.freesergio.com

by sergioFTW on Aug 29, 2008 7:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup

I’m with Jorga and SergioFTW too. That’s why I rarely read fanposts. If I want to read about someone’s crush on a certain bench player, I’ll read the junk drawer…no offense to anyone…too bad some of that stuff has leaked into the main site as well. I guess we’re just “old school” …

by jamon51 on Aug 29, 2008 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Give him some credit

He needs some “Calderón-work” mentality due to improve his shot and his defense, but he needs to play more often to prove he can be a good PG in the league & his coach gotta believe in his possibilities too. If Nate don’t believe, the best Portland can do is trade him.
One of the more important thing to succeed in NBA he already got it, Talent.

Blazers Fans are my boys, Celtic my bhoys.

by Nakamura on Aug 29, 2008 6:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No Breaks

I agree with Dave’s observations, in part because the Trailblazers are an improving team with increasing expectations. As a result, the other players are responding. We’ve heard about Outlaw, Frye, Blake, Webster, Oden and Aldridge all putting in substantial effort much or all of the summer to improve their games and prepare for the regular season. Outlaw has worked on his left hand and decided to be in shape this year from the beginning of the season, not play his way into shape. Frye and Blake have been working regularly with Oden to prepare him, as well as on their own games. Rudy played all summer because of the Olympics – virtually guaranteeing he’ll be in shape and ready to play after taking a few weeks off. Bayless is Bayless. Summer league demonstrated his strengths and weaknesses, and his determination to succeed in combination with his work ethic meant that he kept right on working on the weaknesses the coaches pointed out.

Sergio cannot ignore this activity. Hoopsworld yesterday rated the Blazers as having two of the top 5 rookies coming in – Bayless and Oden, and a third, Fernandez, as the sixth man – who could easily be in the top five. ESPN had similar stories.

The competition, as a result, has ramped up – not declined. Bayless and Fernandez have both shown talent, fearlessness, and determination. Mac has been absolutely firm on Blake as the starting PG, because he is both reliable and intelligent. Mac can count on him to do what Mac wants done, and has said so. Mac and the Blazers are already planning a different offense and a different perspective on how to blend the talent into a complementary backcourt, not a backcourt that has specific roles such as “PG Only”“, or "”SG Only". Mac told Frye when Frye asked how he could get more minutes, that at the end of the game – he wants his scorers on the floor. Sergio must improve his shooting because he’s competing with players like Bayless and Fernandez who can score – it’s not an option.

Sergio is not going to catch any breaks.

by Eben Calder on Aug 29, 2008 6:43 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Also:

If you read Mac’s interview with Jason Quick about Fernandez on OregonLive, you can see how fierce this competition is going to be. He mentions only Fernandez and Bayless, not Sergio. He stated flatly he’s going to play Fernanez, and its pretty obvious that however others might feel, Mac is sold. And so, for that matter, was DÁntonio and the US Team. And who can argue with that.?

by Eben Calder on Aug 29, 2008 7:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Excellent Post

I couldn’t agree more with your points Dave. Sergio has a much better opportunity this year than last, and not because any room was cleared at PG, but because of the new capabilities this team will have at other positions. As you said, no one can run the break like Sergio—and we should certainly be seeing more breaks with both of the two-towers on the floor. And I also believe of all our guards, he can run the pick and roll better than anyone. The problem till now is that we had no one ‘rolling’ on the pick and roll, only pick and poppers. But with Oden, Sergio’s ability to drive and dish to cutters going to the hoop will finally get some traction.

Imagine if in place of every Magloire Fumbled Pass we get a Two-Handed Oden Dunk—Sergio’s assists-per-minute will double.

All that said, it is up to Sergio. He has to bring it to training camp this year. He has to believe he can win those minutes and show everyone what he can do. Roy missing pre-season has the potential to really give him that extra opportunity to show it. We won’t have to wait too much longer to find out.

Free Sergio! http://www.freesergio.com

by sergioFTW on Aug 29, 2008 7:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Sergio and Oden

It will be crucial for Sergio to hit a mid range or finish at the hoop at the beginning of the year for the pick and roll to really blossom between the two. Teams will continually sag off of Sergio not wanting to give Oden an easy alley-oop. Sergio has great vision. He will have to prove he can finish on his own much better than last year.

by Odynasty on Aug 29, 2008 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

my question about Sergio's game

is can he finish at the basket. Of course outside shooting is a main concern, but his speed and quickness allow him to get to the hoop easily, but then he looks terrible trying to finish. If the kid can hit wide open shots AND finish in the half court, Sergio can get more PT. Bif ifs though.

by bad karma on Aug 29, 2008 7:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Opportunity

On paper it sure does look like it’s going to be tough for Sergio. He struggled for playing time and opportunity last season and that was playing with Jarret Jack and the eventually traded Green. All we did was add Bayless and Fernandez, Nates already dreaming up ways of using Fernandez and watching Bayless you kind of get the feeling that unless Bayless spits in Nates milk he’s going to be the type of player Nate likes. So where does Sergio get his opportunity? Bayless, Rudy and Sergio all need development and as a team we are moving away from the “experimental-development” phase into the “let’s start winning now” phase.

Plain and simple barring injury It’s going to be tough. I just wonder if The Blazers handling of Sergio hasn’t technically been a mistake. What we heard the previous summer was that several teams had interest in Sergio. We signed Green and re-obtained Blake. Maybe last Summer was the time to let Sergio go? I have no idea what offers could of been developed or might of been made but Sergio is just in such a tough spot here. Or, if you have that much faith in Sergio, then perhaps you don’t give a contract to a Taurean Green or Obtain a Steve Blake. You create and opportunity and suffer or bask in the results. Now it’s too late. The Blazers went .500 for the season and expectations are high. 3-4 years ago we would of and could of give Sergio a little more experimental development time and freedom. I don’t see it existing anymore.

I was also a little disappointed and in Sergio’s reported post season comments about losing his love of the game and not having fun. Sounded too much like Darius Miles when faced with adversity, saying the game wasn’t fun anymore. Maybe something was lost in translation, maybe I’m reading too much into it, but if the game isn’t fun I say WORK AT IT. I’d be suprised if this season is much different for Sergio, either he’s going to suprise everyone and prove his rookie season moments weren’t flukes and it’s going to be a lot of fun for him, or I think Sergio fades into oblivion and in the future we get reports of him and Joe Freeland bagging groceries.

Every season usually has it’s share of suprises, some good, some bad. My money was secretly on Ike Diogu becoming a fan favorite but you could place a small wager on Sergio regaining some of his love of the game and once again stirring up the phrase “Spanish Chocolate”. Perhaps nobody on the entire roster has more to gain or lose in this upcoming season. I’d also have to say that if I think back to his rookie year Sergio demonstrated skills that clearly weren’t flukes, the guy does have skill. Now he has to expand and become a N.B.A. player. It’s an interesting side story to the upcoming season.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Aug 29, 2008 8:06 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Dave may very well be the best writer in sports

I never post because you always say what I think and then leave me nothing to argue with.

It comes down to Sergio. We need his choas off the bench but he’s going to have to force himself in there. I think he’s going to do it and thus we are just that much more scary. He showed it to me during last years season ender to PHX. He is going to get one season to prove himself while being Rudy’s inturpritor, Get yourself off the bench in the 2nd quarter and show that the offense soars when your in the game.

by Blazersaurus on Aug 29, 2008 8:24 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What a question mark!

Sergio is, IMO, the biggest unknown on the Blazers. If he shows signs of living up to his ‘potential’ and shows improvement in his shooting and defensive performance (yes, Dave, I’ll mention defense even if you won’t), I could see KP use either Blake or Bayless as trade bait, combined with Webster at the trade deadline, looking for an immediate upgrade at SF – letting Sergio handle the backup PG duties.

If he continues to show nothing but potential, then I think that 2008-09 will be the last season we’ll see Sergio in a Blazer uniform.

by Storyteller on Aug 29, 2008 9:00 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Certain trade talk makes me hurt inside

Trade Bayless now? I consider this akin to madness. KP is not mad. He’s very very pleased with his team. I am too.

by Blazersaurus on Aug 29, 2008 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I only said I could see it happening

Who else would the Blazers give up to get Granger?

:)

by Storyteller on Aug 29, 2008 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of cash, praying he doesn't extend this year and making a front loaded offer next year?

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Aug 29, 2008 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Awwww yeah

Throw our cap space at Granger, make Indy blink, and pay LMA/Roy/Oden more or the max so there’s no jealousy.

OPERATION: GRANGER ’09

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Aug 29, 2008 7:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could just as well imagine Sergio as trade bait in a package to acquire a better PG

See the repeating rumors around Conley.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Aug 29, 2008 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I could see that, too

Although Bayless clearly has more trade value today than Sergio.

by Storyteller on Aug 29, 2008 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The rumor is Outlaw + Sergio + pick for Conley

That was an offer before the draft, and now the talks could have re-started if the Blazers aren’t convinced Bayless can play PG right away. I know, #25 and it makes our SF situation murky, but if KP would be convinced this gets him the right long term PG for a fair price it might happen.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Aug 29, 2008 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

eeeeee

sure, it’s good to be fair to him.

barring a miracle or an injury, he’s no better than the 10th man on a team that is supposed to make the playoffs. if he’s going to blossom in any meaningful way, it won’t be here.

so i’m going to go ahead and treat Sergio like taxes, and write him off.

if he proves me wrong, that will be a great feeling. in the meantime, im going to youtube jerryd bayless.

BRANDON ROY GET WELL SOON

by Ben. on Aug 29, 2008 9:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No better than 10th?

Let me think.

Oden, LMA, Webster, Roy, Blake
Pryz, Frye, Outlaw, Fernandez, Bayless

Sergio has to beat out one of those guys to even be 10th best. I’m not going to say it won’t happen, but I’ll be surprised. Very surprised.

Other people don't have as much practice at being wrong as I do -- HT, timbo

by jscot on Aug 29, 2008 9:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

i was trying to be generous

:)

BRANDON ROY GET WELL SOON

by Ben. on Aug 29, 2008 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You were successful

One of my fan posts got 50 signatures. And you thought I was egotistical before. But nobody can do Ego like I can.

by jscot on Aug 29, 2008 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hope he does well

He’s a player on my favorite team. I like the players on my favorite team to do well so that the team does well.

The first day I ever met him he said: "Hi, I'm Ritchie White. I'm on probation."

by tominhawaii on Aug 29, 2008 9:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Homer

Only homers root for ALL of the players.

I hope Ike Diogu gets in a car accident. See? I’m not a homer now because I hate one of our guys.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Aug 29, 2008 7:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You sound like

a L@ker fan.

If you are going to hate on our players, hate nice.

I hope Ike Diogu sprains his pinkie and takes medical retirement so we don’t have to worry about his cap hold.

See? That’s the way to do it. No need to wish bad things like car accidents.

One of my fan posts got 50 signatures. And you thought I was egotistical before. But nobody can do Ego like I can.

by jscot on Aug 30, 2008 4:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ben

I tend to agree with you. The Blazers made the moves they did this year because Sergio did not step up last year. Mac and KP clearly did not see Sergio and Jack having the skills they wanted – and so swapped Jack for Bayless and brought Fernandez over. Reading the interview with Mac, it seems perfectly clear that he – and the Spanish team- consider Rudy to be a far better player. Brandon will get his 32 to 35 minutes, Blake will get his 24 – 26 minutes, and Mac’s comments that Rudy will play a lot can mean only that he’ll get at least 20 (8-10 is not a lot). What’s left? 16 – 18 minutes. Bayless will get those. Why. Because Mac said he sees Rudy and Bayless on the second team in the backcourt, and that Outlaw and Rudy will be the scorers. There’s no Sergio in this scenerio.

When they traded Jack they made it clear that they had concluded that Bayless was better than Jack. And last year, they’d decided that Jack was better than Sergio. Which is why Jack, not Sergio, got the minutes.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see where the Blazers – and Sergio – are headed.

by Eben Calder on Aug 29, 2008 9:46 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Then why didn't they trade Sergio?

It has to be more than just to help Rudy get acclimated.

The first day I ever met him he said: "Hi, I'm Ritchie White. I'm on probation."

by tominhawaii on Aug 29, 2008 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

in terms of trading or not trading sergio

i think it comes down to his perceived value, which is low (non existent?).

most GMs will look at him and see a 3rd or 4th string point guard, with turnover problems, no 3 point shot and problems on the defensive end. that’s a lot of question marks.

he is a throw-in at best.

BRANDON ROY GET WELL SOON

by Ben. on Aug 29, 2008 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

He can also help match salary.

One of my fan posts got 50 signatures. And you thought I was egotistical before. But nobody can do Ego like I can.

by jscot on Aug 29, 2008 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sergio

i believe sergio is the one who holds the blazer record for most workouts in a month.

by sime0n on Aug 29, 2008 9:55 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Have the Blazers handled Sergio correctly?

The time is coming shortly when the evaluation of Sergio will switch from “why didn’t he make it in the NBA?” to “What could have been done differently to help him succeed in the NBA?” Clearly, this is a player who did not match-up with his head coach.

The unasked questions are “why did the Blazers sign Sergio and bring him to the NBA at his age, instead of let him sign with a European team and develop over there? and (once it was clear he wasn’t going to get the PT from Nate) "why didn’t the Blazers send Sergio to the developmental league to work on his game?”

(Dave, you Casey and Gavin should be asking this question of KP)

Why was Sergio handled differently than, say, Petteri Koponen?

by two4larue on Aug 29, 2008 10:05 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps...

…and this is only empty speculation but perhaps Sergio was handled differently than Petteri Koponen because Petteri Koponen isn’t friends with Rudy Fernandez.. You have to at least wonder if The Blazers facing an unsigned Rudy, weren’t a little hesitant to cut or trade or demote his friend on The Blazers. You’d hope Sergio wasn’t kept simply as window dressing to try and get Rudy into the shop but you never know.

"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"

by Krang on Aug 29, 2008 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's possible

And we’ve discussed this in the past. The Blazer’s brass didn’t want to honk off Sergio so he’d poison their potential relationship with Rudy. (If that’s the case, then apparently Nate didn’t get the memo, because Sergio was about as “down” as he could be last spring, just at the time when he could’ve soured Rudy’s opinion of PDX.) In hindsight, we found that Rudy is his own man and (after getting the full court press from Paul Allen, KP and the scouts) he decided to join the Blazers and play BB at the highest level.
Now then, other than to be Rudy’s buddy and ease his transition to Portland, what is the reason for keeping Sergio around? (I think Ben used the term “dead Blazer walking” in reference to Sergio when interviewed last week on that Spanish blog…)
KP hasn’t made many mistakes, but drafting Sergio and immediately throwing him into the NBA fire with Nate as his head coach is looking like it was doomed to failure from the start

by two4larue on Aug 29, 2008 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sergio is good enough to play in the NBA

Sergio does not need to play in Europe. He is much farther ahead then Koponen. Sergio has natural talent you can not teach. I’m glad we have him on the team. Huge upgrade over Bayless running the break. I’m really scared of “tunnel vision” out there running with this team. I hope he doesn’t remind me of JJack.

by Odynasty on Aug 29, 2008 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe D'Antonio would be interested in Sergio?

Sergio compares to a poor man’s Steve Nash when running that score-early-in-the-shot-clock offense D’Antonio prefers. But otherwise I can’t see Sergio getting backup minutes on too many NBA rosters. Maybe he’ll surprise me, but I’m not holding my breath

by two4larue on Aug 29, 2008 4:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I couldn't agree more with you two4larue

…..but the questions (at least "why did the Blazers sign Sergio and bring him to the NBA at his age, instead of let him sign with a European team and develop over there?") should be addressed to Sergio or his agents.

Even in your question “Why was Sergio handled differently than, say, Petteri Koponen?”. You can add Rudy to Koponen. Rudy could have come last year but decided not to do it as he felt he needed more time to be ready for NBA.

When Sergio was playing in Spain he was a great prospect and playing very well (this is the reason he made the spanish national team to be a worldchampion) but he didn’t dominate the game as for example Gasol, Scola, Ginobilli, Nocioni and Calderon when they decided to leave Europe to go NBA. Also the PG position is the most difficult position. My opinion is that he decided to play NBA too early. He should have waited until he would become to one of the best PG in Europe or at least in Spain.

To make matters worse the coach style doesn’t match the Sergio’s Style. Maybe he should have been drafted by Phoenix which it actually happened but trade by cash to Portland.

by cbp on Sep 1, 2008 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're Spot On

Sergio was drafted young and needed time to develop. For whatever reason he signed early, his NBA team sucked, and they needed to develop a lot of players at the same time. He went to a defensive minded coach, and he is an offensive minded player. I think after two years together, that they might be on the same page, or at least the same chapter.

I think Sergio is way ahead of Bayless at this point. Admittedly, I am unlike a lot of NBA coaches and place a lot value on experience.

The first day I ever met him he said: "Hi, I'm Ritchie White. I'm on probation."

by tominhawaii on Sep 1, 2008 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mixed feelings

Let me start by saying I did not follow Rodriguez closely enough in his first season to develop any defensive attitude to people criticizing the guy. In general I celebrate and seek out good criticism of the team, especially of the Walton and Drexler sacred cows, but people were mighty touchy over Rodriguez. In fact I was a little bewildered at all the hype. I figured, he’s a rookie, he has good per-minute stats, but let’s not get too excited; in the meantime, my friends were like, “They gotta play Sergio more than Jack. He’s way better,” and statistically they did have an argument.

Well, whenever I saw him, it was always in scrub minutes where — to take an example from a wonderful game against Memphis this year — he was throwing half-court alley-oops to Travis Outlaw. I wouldn’t call these “flashes of brilliance”; more like the “spoils of victory”. If your team is up big, and you are stealing the ball from, say, an indifferent Kyle Lowry and tossing alley-oops to Travis Outlaw, you are going to have great per-minute stats like the rookie Rodriguez. I’d wager that Danny Young would have demonstrated as many “flashes of brilliance” if he subbed in the fourth with the Blazers demolishing the Grizzlies.

What we forgot about Rodriguez’s second year is that, up through November, Rodriguez was actually playing more minutes per game than his first year average. In fact he was the first player off the bench to substitute for Brandon Roy. So much for the “McMillan hates Spaniards” argument. All right, then what happened? Well, just about everything fans have observed. His play was consistently mediocre throughout the season. His per-minute statistics were off, and he generally had a surly attitude about the game and his standing on the team. I saw him personally in the game at Chicago, and he sulked for the four minutes he was in, missing two shots and committing a stupid foul. At the time I wondered if he was getting that surly ex-pat attitude some people get after living and working overseas for a long period of time. I mean, it happened to me.

He is twenty-two years old, nearly a full year younger than our beloved Rodolfo Fernandez. I can’t say that he’d be putting up Fernandez-like numbers in the Euroleague, but they would have comparable win-scores and PER, I am guessing. Still, as I said, he is twenty-two. And as Kevin Pritchard has repeatedly emphasized, they are comfortable waiting on Rodriguez. If he had attended a four-year college, he would be entering the league this year. Whether playing two years of sloppy ball in the NBA have harmed his game, in comparison to the NCAA or Euroleague experience, well, I think the statistics explain themselves, as well as the hundreds of thoughtful BE posts on Rodriguez. It would have done him a world of good to stick it out in the D-League for the second half of last year.

by rpeachey on Aug 29, 2008 10:41 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Worthy of a rec

If you had a blog I’d read it.

by jamon51 on Aug 29, 2008 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I doubt Sergio would put up Rudy-like numbers in Europe

Rudy was Spain’s 2nd best player in the Olympics, while Sergio was a scrub last year and didn’t even make the team this year. Also, the numbers Rudy has been putting up this year are phenomenal, with a PER of 32.0 in the ACB league (to understand just how impressive that is, the highest PER ever achieved in the NBA was 31.8 by Wilt Chamberlain, with MJ having the 2nd best PER ever at 31.7). It is pretty much impossible for a player to produce such outstanding numbers unless they score a lot of points and score those points in a very efficient manner. Sergio may be a good passer, but he is not a good scorer even by European standards.

by trk on Aug 30, 2008 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Insight

Hi !

My english is very rusty, I don´t know if reading blazersedge could improve it,but I decided to post.

I only want to add some insight about why Sergio didn’t make the Spanish national team.

He almost didn´t play for PTB last year .He has the talent and potential to make the Spanish national team, no doubt, but he haven´t got playing time ( I mean competition pace).If he plays in NBA or ACB it doesn´t matter.

Has been a consistent rumor here in Spain,that the main reason to include Garbajosa in the roster , although he lost a year injured,was because an assurance issue between the Raptors an FEB (Federacion Española de Baloncesto).

Some Spanish fans miss Sergio in Beijing instead of Raul Lopez, but no way without playing time.I think this year Sergio is about to cross the red line as a young basketball player,he can´t afford another season without playing,it´s just a waste of time.It could be the last season in Portland and may be in NBA,who knows.The only true is that he has to improve by NBA standars.

It´s a pity but ACB>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D-league
So no choice for him even two years ago.

by shortpursuit on Aug 29, 2008 11:15 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hi, shortpursuit. I think you are me.

Ok, you are not me, only a deja vu. I´m Spanish also and also came here a few months ago trying to learn English reading about basketball. You´ll find this blog amazing. I encourage you to read these recent posts about Rudy:

Rudy in Spain-USA game videoclip by sagebru5h

Nate loves Rudy by OCBlazerFan1

Rudy-Rudy-Rudy by kjhooper2007

Rudy Recap: Breaking Down the Defense by Dave

Rudy Recap: Game 2 by Dave

There are many other great posts about Rudy too, I remember some by Myemic, Nokstroll, SpyderRyder and Jscot and I´m forgetting others for sure, but these are good enough for a first time.

Another interesting read is Blazersedge Conversational Rules

The Midnight Rambler

by amlmart1 on Aug 29, 2008 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Im thinking Sergio will get far more PT than expected. Here's why:

My thought is that Bayless has been greatly overrated (based mostly on a few summer league games.) He has a long way to go to be a PG in the NBA. I’m not even sure he will fit in with the team. I also wouldn’t be surprised to see him traded sometime within the next year.

This following post done by Longviewdawg at O’Live yesterday sums up my thoughts quite well (I’m not sure about the college history though as I didn’t much follow Bayless there). The post was done in retaliation to an assertion that Bayless should start over Blake and therefore had nothing to do with Sergio. However it does relate ‘cuz if the shortcomings that Longviewdawg and I perceive in Bayless’ game are accurate, it would set the stage for Sergio to play a bigger role with the team this year than most are expecting..

posted by longviewdawg on 08/23/08 at 12:37PM
rdh123:

Blake is world’s better than Bayless at point guard. Bayless really has no clue how to play the position. You think Jack was bad with turnoverz, Bayless is much worse and is less skilled at this point that Jack. Bayless was 50% more likely to comit a turnover against NCAA competion than Jack against NBA competion. Blake is in elite company when it comes to initiating the offense without turning the ball over. Against, extremely weak summer league competion, Bayless has a negative turnover ratio exceeding 3:1. Blake had a positive turnover ratio of plus 3.5:1 against strong NBA competion.

You think Bayless will start at point. It’s ridiculous. When was the last time the top point guard in the PAC10 became a regular starter in the NBA? Bayless was a bad point guard last season and led his team to a horrible finish…losing 9 of the last 13 games…with 2 of the4 wins over Oregon State. He was 22nd in the PAC10 in assist to turnover ratio on a team that played at a rather slow pace. Three players on his own team had better ratios than Bayless.

Somehow you are ignoring his tryout at point in Summer League when he led the Blazer to exactly 2 points in 10 minutes and showed almost no passing skills through out. It was so bad, he had to be replaced in the middle of his supposed opportunity to prove himself even though it was only summer league.

After watching Bayless, Roy said: “Bayless IS NOT A POINT GUARD.” He’s an undersized shooting guard that can’t defend his position. At 6’ 1.75" and with short arms, he can’t guard most NBA shooting guards without leaving his feet…and you don’t want him leaving his feet on defense.


Bayless is a scorer… but he’s going to struggle trying to go the rack like he did in summer league. He’ll quickly be scouted and forced to his weak left hand where even the slightest bump causes him to lose control of the ball. (He lost control four times in a row in SL…regaining one by grabbing it with both hands. He also had the ball stolen 3 times (twice in a row) as he tried to transition from right to left hand. On most finishes on the left side of the basket he switched to his right, and on drives on the leftt side he would take one dribble with his left (looking down at the ball) and then switch to his right….even with defenders on his right.

You’ve let points scored obscure you objectivity. On many drives to the lane he had no prayer of scoring,but got bailed out by the usual overly exuberant whistles of SL refs. 95% of the time he failed to get the ball even close to the rim and I don’t believe he had more than 1 basket the entire summer league after being fouled.(no matter how lightly. Jack wasn’t a good finisher, Bayless is worse.

I remember telling him how impressed I was with a player during summer league. In Avery's unique voice, he replied, "Marc, it's summer league." I

by TwoDeep on Aug 29, 2008 11:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Clueless on Bayless

You try driving into the lane when the whole team knows you are the only option on a fairly crappy SL team and keep the ball from being poked away. They didn’t let him play much PG because when he did play, nobody else could make a shot. The coach even said so. Once he got his shooting touch, I believe I saw quite a few bombs going down from long range. Brandon Roy might have said that he is not a PG, but Brandon Roy also said that he is looking forward to balling with him- along with many of the other Blazers.

by ralphzillo on Aug 29, 2008 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure if I agree with his police work

Bayless had plenty of And-1’s. He also is a much better finisher inside.

As far as his turnovers in college, well, he had 4 assists a game, leading his team in scoring and assists and like in his summer league was surrounded by untalented dolts. He was also a frosh.

I’ve noticed you’ve been very negative about Bayless, finding him to be selfish and arrogant, and I’m not sure what made you think that, TwoDeep.

Bayless will also be guarding point guards, so I don’t know why his criminally short arms will matter against SGs… his speed will definitely bother slower SGs though, if forced to defend them.

Aside from running a team, we saw nothing but good things frm Bayless in summer league, on defense as well as offense. He said and did the exact right things. I can’t imagine what made you so down on him, but I’m assuming it’s something just rubbing you the wrong way that you can’t point to specifically, because Bayless didn’t do anything wrong.

I don’t think he’ll start right away and his PG skills are unknown, but he’s also a 19 year old— and we know he can defend PGs (guarded the quick NBA PGs well in summer league) and we know he can drive and finish (I definitely don’t get that part of the argument you posted above). Those are things that fit next to Roy, not Sergio’s overdribblin’.

The writer is also going on old scouting reports, that say Bayless needs work on his left. He went to his left plenty of times in the summer league, because I was watching for that. Even finished a few And-1’s with his left hand.

I don’t see how it matters what former Pac-10 PGs did in the NBA, unless Bayless is somehow genetically related to them. People used to love Ridnour before realizing he sucks; that’s a regular starting PG for ya if one needs to be noted. Still don’t see what he has to do with Bayless though… hey, Gary Payton was a Pac-10 PG too. Still, not related.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Aug 29, 2008 7:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta be careful in this reply

as I notice my other one to you has been deleted.? (I thought I was being careful in that one too).

Your quote:

Aside from running a team, we saw nothing but good things frm Bayless in summer leagu

Running a team, isn’t that what PG’s are supposed to be able to do? That’s by far the primary reason I’m not in the Bayless camp.

I remember telling him how impressed I was with a player during summer league. In Avery's unique voice, he replied, "Marc, it's summer league." I

by TwoDeep on Aug 31, 2008 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mine is gone too...

…but I think it has to do with the SBN shutdown that happened last night, as neither of us said anything bad.

The gist of my reply was that it WAS summer league, and if Sergio can get a break for not running a team an entire summer league, I think Bayless, at 19, should get a break as well. Doing something bad in summer league isn’t a great sign, but he did a lot of great things that are duplicable— and I feel like you have already-decided negative feelings about the kid, and chose the quote from the O-live poster because it shared your beliefs, not because it said anything actually true (because it didn’t, really).

Also I was saying I like reading your stuff because you approach things differently than I and come to different outcomes than me, and because of that I can have a hard time seeing where you’re coming from but it makes me re-think why I think something. In certain situations I’m still not sure how you came to a conclusion (such as Oden isn’t smart, Joel played well in 2006, Bayless is arrogant and his career path is already decided, etc…) but that’s still a good thing.

There was more than that, explaining the copy n’ paste of the quotes and whatnot, but SBN ate it. Nuthin’ bad, of course, just more clarification. I’m pretty sure you woulda’ been convinced and bought a Bayless 4 Eva shirt afterwards, so just pretend you’re convinced.

So, we didn’t do anything wrong, I’d hope. We weren’t mean!

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Aug 31, 2008 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I expect Morty that no one is reading this thread any longer,

so it’s kind of like just you and I now — almost like sending emails back and forth. So maybe I can be a little freer with a couple of thoughts.

You have an amazing memory Mortimer. I think I only posted once, or twice perhaps (my memory is leagues below yours and getting worse as I age) about Oden being somewhat less on the brilliance chart than say someone like Brandon Roy (who I think is extremely quick minded and somewhat brilliant even). Most all of what I’ve posted regarding Oden from day one regarded my concern that he was not healthy ( that hasn’t gone away) and also about his apparent (to me anyway) lack of passion, fire and drive for basketball and the NBA.

But about his smarts. The very first clue: When Oden hurt his hand at OSU he suggested to his coach that he be red-shirted. Red-shirting would give him an additional year of eligibility.
Did he really think he’d be playing at OSU long enough that he would need 4 years of eligibility? Or did he even know what red-shirting meant? Or did he have any clue of how long he was likely to play in the college ranks? Everyone else seemed to know, why not him?

Then, immediately following his micro-fracture surgery, after apologizing to the town of Portland, he seemed totally surprised that he would be out for the entire season, even though KP had indicated that the possibility of micro-fracture surgery had certainly been discussed with him pre-op. And of course it would have been. Then there is Greg’s indiscretion of seeking out some recreation by playing in that pick-up game (Nate had to intervene there), and his getting so ‘pumped up’ over the muscles he was adding through weight lifting that he allowed himself to get far heavier than what was best for his healing knee. Nate had to intervene again.

And there are his interviews; they are wonderful because he is so refreshingly naive and open, but sometimes what he says ………

I’m only bringing this stuff up now because you didn’t understand how I could think that Oden may not be the sharpest cheese on the cracker. I’m not trying to trash him. He is a Blazer now. But we maybe should be careful with our expectations.

Bayless? I’m mostly trying to counteract the exaggerated expectations so many have for him based on his SL showing of being able to get to the rack. Ironically, it was his SL showing that left me with my reservations.

Rudy? Different story, he’s likely gonna be terrific!. And Brandon Roy is my hero. LA and Travis are the best. Love Blake and Pryz, Martel too if he can ever shoot like he’s supposed to (love his athleticism though), Frye’s a great guy, and Sergio needs to be given a chance. Just letting you know, I don’t get bad vibes about all the Blazers.

Question (since this is a semi-private discussion): Is Mortimer your real name? I suspect not, because that would be too cool and unique. Mortimer Snerd is the only other Mortimer I can ever remember hearing. I’m giving away my age with that one, huh?

That’s all Morty. I’m just a modest little person with much to be modest about.

I remember telling him how impressed I was with a player during summer league. In Avery's unique voice, he replied, "Marc, it's summer league." I

by TwoDeep on Aug 31, 2008 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Guess who's back ;-)

Regard Oden’s smarts and effort: He might not be the next Nobel prize winner, but I doubt he doesn’t understand what’s going on around him. E.g. he returned with Conley to summer school to continue working on his education. Took something like a principles of biology course if I’m not mistaken. How many active NBA players do that?

That there are health concerns can’t be discussed away with a guy whose legs are a different size and who already needed micro-fracture surgery in a small area of his knee. Yet by all accounts he worked really hard on his rehab, and cause he couldn’t do much with his legs in the first months pumped iron and maybe gained somewhat too much muscle on his upper body. Now he needs to get his stamina back, but that’s the easiest part. He also put in the effort of learning to shoot FTs with his off-hand when a lot of players would have just said they can’t do that. So I guess the work ethic is there. Sometimes he has this sleepy look and voice that might make you think he isn’t passionate, but he shares that e.g. with TMac. He will be fired up enough during games.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 1, 2008 5:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

At the end I finally know something about Bayless.

If that reference it is true my first impression is that Bayless is a 2 within a physical body of a 1 which IMHO it is the worst thing can happen to a basketball player. Most worse it is that he will be asked to play 1 in short term and the 2 position is crowded. If he is smart and given enough time he might be a real 1.

let’s see….

by cbp on Sep 1, 2008 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sergio is the Spanish Ambassador to Portland

No doubt that Sergio is here to be a buddy of Rudy. He still has a chance to play some minutes and could surprise from time-to-time, but let’s get real. His biggest problem is he’s got S-L-O-W feet and weeeakk strength. The last time I checked, that don’t get you too far in the pros.

by ralphzillo on Aug 29, 2008 11:36 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

TwoDeep

I can understand you’re confusion about PG – and about Blake. Certainly, no one understimates Blake as a PG. However, you’d do better to listen to KP and to Mac. And, you might also listen to Roy. I’d also like the source of the quote you attribute to Roy, since the interview he gave subsequent to the end of summer league didn’t remotely confirm anything you said. Among other things, he also commented that Blake had to adjust to his play, and they took sometime to gel given Roy also runs plays. Remember, Bayless will guard the point, bring the ball up, and give it off to Roy to run plays (when he’s playing with Roy). If there’s one thing you and everyone talking about keeps glossing over – it’s the Blazers want the ball in Roy’s hands much of the game in the 1/2 court. Bayless is expected to complement Roy – not be a pure point guard. Which is why they didn’t draft and haven’t traded for a pure point. Which is also why Sergio may have trouble surviving. He can’t just be a PG. He has to complement Roy to play, and that means he has to be able to shoot – and to score. The Blazers drafted a combo guard that they believe they can turn into a PG some of the time – but that he’ll play combo most of the time. Big difference in how you use a player. You also demonstrate confusion over what the coaches wanted him to do in summer league, which was to be the go to scorer, not the PG.

by Eben Calder on Aug 29, 2008 12:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Amen

Good rebuttal EC

Styx -"I'm schizophrenic....and so am I"

by 92wastheyear on Aug 29, 2008 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Think Jordan & Paxson.

      Jordan created, Paxson spotted up. Paxson guarded
the PG, Jordan -SG . Good pairing.
     Roy is a poor man’s Jordan. Not as flashy, and dosen’t
care about scoring big #’s., but can breakdown almost
any defender and create/finish. Leader.
     Big difference in teams – We have GO & Smooth ++.
Time, percolation, culture, talent + experience = DYNASTY !

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Aug 29, 2008 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eben, as far as the quote attributed to Roy:

No, the poster didn’t give his source. But the Roy quote in it’s entirety was “Bayless is not a point guard” (The rest of the statement was the poster’s own words.) After watching Bayless in Vegas, I don’t find it unlikely that Roy said that. He may have said something like, ‘Bayless is not a point guard, he is a combo guard’ … who knows. But it seems pretty clear to me that Bayless is not yet close to being a legit NBA point guard.

Addressing one of your points, I actually don’t think Portland is necessarily convinced they didn’t/don’t need another true point guard as you have suggested. They did supposedly try to get Calderon after all. Likely, it’s just that no top flight ones have been readily available.

If the coaches wanted, as you say, for Bayless to be the go-to scorer and not the PG in Summer League, you are ignoring the tryout they gave him that one game at PG which they had to bail out on early as he was so terrible at it. And I don’t buy that it was because he didn’t have anyone to pass it to as some have stated. There were 4 teammates on the floor with him. What those guys would do with it shouldn’t have been so much Bayless’ concern. Achieving a good win/loss record in those summer league games is not the top priority; it’s to take stock of the players you have down there. The Blazers indeed did want to see how he could run the point and how well he could set others up …. and they found out. As Monte mentioned, Bayless would just kind of go out on his own.

 I think Jerryd’s main goal down there was to show everyone how wrong they were for letting him fall to #12 in the draft. I really think there is a good chance we will find him to be a me-first player and that he won’t be a good fit on our current team. Time will shortly tell. I’d love to be completely wrong as how would I not want another young, talented, team oriented player on our beloved Blazers.

Appreciate Eben your good manners in disputing the anti-Bayless thoughts in my post, especially considering you are probably the 2nd biggest Bayless fan on this site (you wouldn’t be Jerryd’s father, would you? Brother? Agent?).

Like I mentioned, the season will soon be on us, then we’ll know and all this speculation can end. But before we reach that point, my prediction is that Bayless is a long way from getting significant minutes on this year’s Blazer team.

I

I remember telling him how impressed I was with a player during summer league. In Avery's unique voice, he replied, "Marc, it's summer league." I

by TwoDeep on Aug 29, 2008 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If folks who think Bayless would fit on this Blazer team

are either Jarryd’s family or agents……then he has a lot of brothers (and sisters) on this site. I haven’t seen much anti-Bayless sentiment on this site….you are kinda on your own with that one

Styx -"I'm schizophrenic....and so am I"

by 92wastheyear on Aug 29, 2008 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure if you read the article

Here is the link:
http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2008/07/part_iii_roy_and_bayless_a_mat.html

You’re picking out one line and taking it out of context, or at least the O-Live poster is. It is, out of the entire article, the only line that could be considered negative about Bayless and even then it isn’t a negative unless you are reading the line by itself. Picking out one line and removing it from it’s context means nothing.

Here are some quotes from Roy, who you trust regarding Bayless when supposedly he says “he is not a point” so you should trust the rest (I bolded some relevant quotes):

"The reason why I see me playing with Jerryd is because he can guard points,‘’ Roy said. " He may not be a one, but he can guard a one, so then it fits into exactly what we want to do. A lot of times with Jarrett and Blake, they would get frustrated because they were playing a two on offense. Whereas (Jerryd) is comfortable playing two on offense and he’s comfortable playing one on defense. That’s why I tell people who say he is not a point: If he was a point, it would take away from what I do, so it’s almost fine that he’s not a point. ’’

"I like him,‘’ Roy said. "I like the way he plays, his aggressiveness. More than anything, I like his attitude. Winning is an attitude … and I think Jerryd brings that. I can tell by the way he plays that he wants to be the best.’’

“We share a lot of similarities,‘’ Roy said. "He’s a little bit smaller, but he’s tough. And he guards … and I think the biggest thing I like about him is he is confident. In this league you gotta be.”

So, I think it is clear that Roy does not agree with you and that the quote you are referencing does not support your argument at all. Roy appears to be quite high on Bayless, but I guess one could take this as Roy being very careful with Bayless’ delicate nature and doesn’t want to offend him so he said a bunch of stuff that isn’t true (that is a joke).

The quote wasn’t taken with any ambiguity. It’s quite clear that Roy watched Bayless and took away a very positive impression from it. Only reading in what you want to see could you see anything negative there.

If Bayless is seen as the newest impediment to Sergio getting minutes, I also think that’s mistaken— if anyone besides Sergio being Sergio is limiting Sergio, it will be Rudy. If we need nice playmaking in the 2nd unit and Bayless isn’t cutting it, hello Rudy.

If you saw Bayless being a ballhog and didn’t like that, I could see that. The other stuff— too arrogant, not a good fit (said in this thread and others), I’m not sure where it’s coming from. If you don’t agree with the argument that he had no one to pass to and when the offense was stifled for 20 seconds he took over, that’s fine. But just like you would say to people who think Bayless is awesome for scoring 30ppg, I think you’re basing way too much off of summer league.

KP, Nate, Monty, Roy, everyone was very high on what Bayless did. If he doesn’t do what they ask of him, he won’t play.

The last thing Bayless appears to be is stupid, so if your worst fears are true he’s smart enough to change. And if you think a 19 year old’s game doesn’t change, well…

(Oh, and I remember you asking me if I was related to Nate after defending his handling of Sergio, just like you’re wondering if Eben is related to Bayless. Are you sure your full name isn’t TwoDeep Rodriguez? I thought I noticed a Spanish accent in your posts!)

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Aug 30, 2008 1:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, I'm Sergio's grandmother, but I didn't really want to let that out.

I’ve posted before that I’m not necessarily a big Sergio fan. It’s more that I have serious reservations regarding Bayless. Some think Bayless will be the first PG off the bench to spell Blake. I’m suggesting that because of the limitations I see in Bayless as a PG, Sergio could be that guy instead.

You wasted a lot of time Mortimer in disparaging the quote attributed to Brandon Roy. That wasn’t my thought at all; in fact I discredited the quote in my reply to Eben. It was simply embedded in the post I’d pulled from O-live which I copied ‘cuz I thought that poster made a number of other valid observations backed up with some numbers. Interesting that you chose to ignore those other points, instead using 7 paragraphs to focus on the easily refutable Roy quote. Come on Morty – you’re better than that.

P.S. I certainly agree that Rudy will be gobbling up some significant guard minutes. But I don’t expect many of these to be PG minutes. My real ‘point’ is that while I think Rudy will end up getting significant minutes because of his talent and well-rounded play, I don’t expect the same at all from a rookie point guard who doesn’t seem able (or willing) to see the floor and actually pass the ball.

I remember telling him how impressed I was with a player during summer league. In Avery's unique voice, he replied, "Marc, it's summer league." I

by TwoDeep on Aug 30, 2008 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm 1/2 with you

I don’t want to get into the last two paragraphs but I think a lot of people wrote off Sergio after Bayless was drafted and how he performed in the summer league. They fail to take into account that no matter how crappy Sergio was last year, he was still here last year, and the year before. I think Bayless is starting point guard of the future, but right now Sergio has two years in Nate’s system and experience with Rudy. Nate already said Rudy is going to get playing time and I think a lot of his playing time is going to be next to Sergio.

The first day I ever met him he said: "Hi, I'm Ritchie White. I'm on probation."

by tominhawaii on Aug 30, 2008 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you a fan of the "Wages of Wins Journal"?

Statistically their analysis was pretty down on Bayless, but the same can be said about almost every other PG/SG prospect in the draft not named Rose, so what were the Blazers supposed to do if they wanted one? And even with all the minutes Rose will undoubtedly get in Chicago he will most likely need a few years to develop to full strength leading a team, initially making some guys like Beasley look like the better (safer) draft pick. http://www.wagesofwins.com/2008NCAAProspectTable.html

So let’s suppose Bayless isn’t the ideal solution for the position next to Roy this year, what does this mean for Sergio? Yeah, he could ascend to being the #2 behind Blake, with Bayless playing some time on PG but mostly as a third SG. But it could just as well mean they ride out the rough times while Bayless learns and Sergio gets traded in a package for a new more “pure” point guard to replace him (or even Steve as the #1). Either way, If Bayless demonstrates point guard skills right away or not, I doubt Sergio will get many chances showing and honing his skills unless he improves the areas Dave listed. Quick.

Don’t get me wrong, I think he has the ability to be a really good point guard (not Nash-like, just really good). But more than anything he needs minutes on the floor to become one, and is too young to settle into a third-string role in the NBA. If he doesn’t improve almost exponentially showing continuous signs he could replace Blake in 2010 which will be really hard for him to do, I suppose his mid-term future is not in this quandary of expectations and limited minutes with the Blazers but rather on another NBA team or even back in Europe.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Aug 30, 2008 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Wasted a lot of time.."

Comin’ from the guy quoting O-live posts!

You know I like reading you, TwoDeep, and a big part of that is because I know you approach things differently than I do. An offshoot of that is sometimes I can’t imagine how you came up with a certain POV— Oden isn’t smart was one example, Joel played well in 2006, Bayless is arrogant and doesn’t fit are others I’ve disagreed with you about.

I thought I responded to that guy’s O-Live post up above… the main point I was saying is, he’s mostly incorrect and basing his opinion off of old scouting reports. I don’t think Bayless will start, so it’s not about that. His “stats” regarding and-1’s, going to his left, all were made up. Guarding SGs? He isn’t going to guard SGs. And etc. Derrick Rose had over 2 TOs a game to go with his 4.7 assists, not too far from non-PG Bayless.

Basically, in this post and others you’ve written in other threads, I get a strong anti-Bayless feeling from you and I’m not sure why. Even if you didn’t like how he played in summer league, he was 19. Give the dude a chance. It’s not like Sergio ever had 6 games like that, let alone in summer league. He’s still a young guy who deserves a break, right?

Oh, and the post really didn’t take long to write… it’s mostly just quotes from Roy gushing about Bayless, which are there to help calm your nerves about how Bayless will fit in with the team. Copy n’ paste, click n’ done! Great leader Roy, KP, and Nate all seem to love what the kid does so far, and you seemed to think Roy’s “He might not be a 1” quote had some ambiguity to it. I thought it was clear from reading the article that what Roy liked about Bayless is that he fits next to him. The quotes aren’t to refute the “he’s not a 1”, it’s to help put that quote in the larger context of “I’m glad he isn’t a pure 1”.

None of what Sergio has done in the past really fits well with Roy unless you don’t want Roy handling the ball. And Roy is playing all but 10 minutes a game like last season, most likely.

My main point of my post is to try to get to the reason why you think Bayless is an awful ballhog who is overrated already. I also think you can’t judge a kid from summer league for the most part, good or bad (though if they are a quick guard and play bad it is pretty much a bad sign always, since summer league is made for those players).

Ya seem to have made up your mind with Bayless, and give a lil’ more rope to other players. It’s odd to me, seeing as the kid hasn’t even had a training camp yet and just turned 20. In 2 months he’ll have learned more basketball than he’s learned his entire life… kinda early to be judging him so harshly, which I’ve seen ya do in other posts aside from this one.

And it makes me think you liked that pretty dreadful O-live post because it agreed with your already-decided negative view of Bayless.

I hope Sergio makes some waves early on, and if he doesn’t we trade him. If he doesn’t gain some traction early on he’s going to drown in the sea of talent. I’d like him to be on another team that can give him a chance, and not continue to be a distraction amongst the fanbase if he doesn’t prove himself to the franchise that he deserves minutes off the bat.

Don’t you think not playing in summer league and pouting in the Canary Islands is worse than shooting a good percentage and scoring a lot of points in summer league, even if he didn’t show excellent playmaking skills? I know which situation I favor. Martell learned not to pout so much, and I hope Sergio does too.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Aug 30, 2008 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eben Calder I don't understand....

If Blazers drafted Bayless to " guard the point, bring the ball up, and give it off to Roy to run plays (when he’s playing with Roy). ". IMO, that’s quite simple (maybe I can do the job LOL).

In serious if this is the main job of him you are not talking of a point guard but a small guard.

by cbp on Sep 1, 2008 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually that would be a big part of his job description (or anybody else playing PG with Roy) as the plan stands

Roy is a very good passer / facilitator for a shooting guard who can create shots for himself but just as well set other people up like a point guard (close to six assists per game last season). But due to his size he is not as quick as a true one, and needs his energy for his own plays. So another combo guard handling the ball might be ideal for playing alongside Roy.

Offensively a good point guard to play with him needs to bring the ball up the court against very quick guys trying to steal it or blocks being set. That constant dribbling, turning, changing speed looks pretty easy when a pro does it, but takes a lot of concentration and energy cause usually there is no one behind him when he commits a turnover. Then sometimes the PG will make the play, and sometimes he will give it up to Roy to run the point. If he is a serious scoring threat like Bayless when switching to the SG spot (which Blake despite being a good outside shooter isn’t when faced with big defensive guards), even better.

Defensively again, the point guard needs to be able to effectively guard the opposing point cause Roy can’t do that consistently.

Odenied: Asked whether he noticed Oden favoring his right knee, Frye dismissed it entirely. "He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors."

by Norsktroll on Sep 1, 2008 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why did we trade Jack instead of Sergio?

Oh yeah, for the love of “upside”.

In my opinion it was yet another instance where the Blazers front office (and the rest of the NBA besides the Spurs perhaps) shows that they value upside (I feel sorry for those young players who are labeled as having much upside) rather than what a player can do now.

Nearly everytime the Blazers have acquired a player based on upside (Telfair, Sergio, Darius Miles, Bonzi) its turned out mediocre at best. But when they acquire a player who is ready to contribute now (Roy, Blake, James Jones, Frye), it seems to turn out better. (I hope Bayless and Rudy and Oden can buck the trend here.)

Yeah, Jack may not have as much upside as Sergio. But I witnessed him directly help win several games last year in the 4th quarter.

What do ya’ll think?

by nathTnorman on Aug 29, 2008 1:10 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Precisely

One of my fan posts got 50 signatures. And you thought I was egotistical before. But nobody can do Ego like I can.

by jscot on Aug 29, 2008 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

ok, you answered that question, but...

let’s hope Bayless can actually contribute this year as well as Jack did last year…b/c of Bayless’s young age I’m doubting that that’s going to happen…again, betting on the “upside”…which seems to me is risky….compared with going something you know…

by nathTnorman on Aug 29, 2008 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You got to bet on the upside

once in a while. KP targeted Bayless and felt that he at least could do what Jack does and brings defense and a confidence that, sadly, Jack lacks.

Styx -"I'm schizophrenic....and so am I"

by 92wastheyear on Aug 29, 2008 1:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only way Jack was good enough

to be a significant contributor on a championship team was if he had a lot of upside.

If you kept Jarrett, you were counting on upside, too. He just hadn’t showed he was good enough.

So you had to bet on upside, one way or another. And I’m convinced that, for this team, Bayless has a much higher upside than Jarrett. Why? Two points, really. First, he’s a better long-ball shooter. Second, he’s a better man defender. Those are the two most important attributes we need at that position.

Is he better at going to the hoop and drawing fouls? I don’t know, but I don’t think he’s going to be much worse.

One of my fan posts got 50 signatures. And you thought I was egotistical before. But nobody can do Ego like I can.

by jscot on Aug 29, 2008 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course...

You are forgetting that Jack has the horizontal eyebrows of power and normally-proportioned (for an NBA player) arms. Both can be used to strike fear into the heart of his opponents.

And, there’s always his callous disregard for sidelines.

I miss Jack. :-(

by DonkeyShins on Aug 29, 2008 11:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's the other factor

Indiana wanted someone with a vision for expanding the court. Jarrett clearly had such a vision.

One of my fan posts got 50 signatures. And you thought I was egotistical before. But nobody can do Ego like I can.

by jscot on Aug 30, 2008 5:31 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dave, It seems that Sergio is held to a higher standard

It seems to me that you are holding Surgio to a higher standard than, say Steve Blake, who you are willing to give a pass to because he’s STEADY. I’d love to see Blake do all of the aforementioned things that you are saying Sergio needs to do in order to get time on the floor.
It’s just one man’s observation, but do we hold Sergio to a higher standard because he has….let’s face it. A very special skill set that not many players have, and that’s the abillity to play at a fast pace, and make the great thread the needle pass. Not to mention, by all accounts, teamates love to have him on the court.

2-4 the who

by 24thewho on Aug 29, 2008 1:21 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Not so much a higher standard

as just the reality of their situations. Blake has proven again and again that he can play in this league. At what level remains up to debate, but there’s no doubt he’s an NBA player. That means he doesn’t have to do the things I mentioned that Sergio needs to just to earn playing time. That’s not necessarily even a comparison between the two. It is a comparison between their situations. Sergio does have to play stronger, harder, faster than other players to break into the rotation.

If I walk into a company and I’m a newer guy or I have a shaky year, I know my bosses are going to go with the guy they’re comfortable with over me. In order to change that I have to be 100% committed to giving them every reason to look my way. It’s not good enough to be good enough…if I want that assignment they’d otherwise give to the long-termer, that is. I may be just as good as that guy, but I have to go above and beyond to show it.

—Dave

by Dave on Aug 29, 2008 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unlikely Sergio will get minutes/chance

Today’s Quick article confirms that Nate is impressed with Rudy and plans to play him (a lot). Still seems like Blake is the starting point guard and he probably is working well with Oden since he’s had extra time with him. The honeymoon may be fading with Bayless, but Nate does see him as “fearless” and we traded away Jack for him. We did not sign the “pure” PG Koponen and Roy has stated he might not want to play with an All-star calibre PG if we had one. Nate hates flash and Sergio is flashy.

Conclusion: Little or no time for Sergio.

by vcubed on Aug 29, 2008 1:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Can´t agree this time. What Nate hates is to lose.

Sergio´s “flashes” may fit very well with Oden, Rudy and even Bayless, not to talk about Outlaw, LMA and Frye, if the team switch sometimes to running mode and it works out being productive.

The Midnight Rambler

by amlmart1 on Aug 29, 2008 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"flashes"

This is what I have seen “El Mago” do for Our Team consistently.
I know when Sergio comes onto the court, he is going to change the pace of the game. Book It!

Whether this is successful or not is what will determine Sergio’s PT. Developing a consistant scoring threat and his defense can lead to this being a valued tool in winning games.

"He doesn't let grass grow under his feet when there are points to be had." - Dave

by BlueBooYay on Aug 30, 2008 9:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honeymoon Not Fading with Bayless.

I don’t think the honeymoon is fading with Bayless at all. It’s just that we saw him first and concentrated on him at a time when most of us really didn’t know too much about Fernandez. Now we’re focussed on Fernandez because after summer league was over, the Olympics were being played and Rudy played well.

We, after all, didn’t vote Bayless the MVP in summer league, everyone else having a vote did. So, obviously. a lot of others were impressed with Bayless, including scouts, coaches and writers watching summer league. I’m also not certain you can compare history pre-KP, to what we are doing now. Roy and Aldridge, after all,were rookies when they came in, so that like Fernandez and Bayless today, all we had to look at in the beginning was upside. Summer league showed off some some of their skills, but who on this board took one look at summer league and predicted that Roy was an Allstar, and Aldridge was close. We didn’t even start Aldridge the first year at PF, we started Randolph. Bayless is the baby of this entire group – as in the youngest and least experienced of any of them. Oden was less a draft – than the luck of the draft. He was the #1 pick and he was a concensus #1 as well. He’s simply a one in 10 year center.. But you don’t normally get those types unless you are drafting #1. Walton, Hakeem, Shaq, Robinson, Jabbar – all were #1. In the parlance of our day – he was the “no-brainer”. So saying he is “ready” to contribute ignores this fundamental fact.

I think Mac, KP and Roy have always been pretty clear on Bayless – something Mac confirmed in Quick’s interview. No one expected him to be a starter. So, he’s slotted alongside Rudy, a good passer, on the #2 team, and expected when playing with Roy to complement Roy Blake is slotted to start opposite Roy, after all, because Mac needs a point that can translate what he wants done on the court, and until our two rookies learn the system and play awhile – they simply can’t do that. They need coaching and direction. Blake is a “"glue guy” from where I sit. After all folks, we’ve got three talented rookies that a lot of other teams would certainly love to have, and we’re trying to buy them some space to play, learn, and improve – as we would with any rooky. We just happen to have three. Blake’s not spectacular – but he’s solid. And with two rookies in the backcourt – we need that right now.

In the end, the only real debate seems to be 1) why did we trade Jack – not Sergio; and 2) Is Bayless as good or better than Jack? The first is answered. Sergio did not play well enough last year to demonstrate to Indiana, or to Mac, that he could be a solid backup point guard, which is what Indiana wanted. So, we traded Jack. The second is, at least for some, still an unknown. Bayless, at 19, had better stats in college than Jack at 19, and in summer league showed better skills than Jack did in summer league. After all, no one voted Jack the MVP.

Some seem to imply that Bayless “must” replace Jack’s stats “this” year to prove he was worth the trade. What kind of thinking is that? The fair comparison would be to compare Bayless’s first year stats with Jack’s first year, who, after all, was older coming in and had more experience from the outset.

But, we’re impatient. We have a 20 year old who we want to play like a 23 year old with two or three years in the NBA – and some are ready to throw him to the dogs if he plays like a rooky. Relax, Bayless is fine.

by Eben Calder on Aug 29, 2008 6:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

3368861 seconds until first preseason game!

Don’t worry, I’ll be here tomorrow with an update.

by DarthBlazer on Aug 29, 2008 7:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Huh?

Jack is gone.

by lethaldose on Aug 29, 2008 9:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What? Where?

Did he go to the store? Tell him we’re out of Total.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Aug 30, 2008 1:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He always was gone

when it came to leading a running offense.

Jack’s a legit player, and will probably have a good career. A running PG he isn’t.

One of my fan posts got 50 signatures. And you thought I was egotistical before. But nobody can do Ego like I can.

by jscot on Aug 30, 2008 5:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

TwoDeep

I don’t think I’m a great fan of Bayless particularly. I tend to trust KP and Mac’s judgement on these things, and to give all the rookies the benefit of the doubt. That’s all. I’ve never been critical of Jack, for example, and think he’ll have a solid NBA career. You’ve also never seen me beat up Sergio. I get to Spain where my wife’s family has a vacation spot about 60 miles from Barcelona to hang out, and like the country and the people. The fact that the Blazers drafted a guard – knowing they had Fernandez already likely to come over, tell’s me that there were some issues that we perhaps don’t fully appreciate. They obviously are looking for someone to play with Roy over time that can put more points up, and perhaps fit his style better. Players, after all, often dictate the system a coach uses. Indiana may be the perfect mix for Jack, because he’s not playing with Roy, but with another guard in a different system with whom his style may be a better fit. I’ve never thought that Bayless was the second coming. I do suspect that he may be a better fit over time, and therefore improve the spot and the team. Which is what its all about. We’re never going to have Allstars everywhere. Mac needs some weapons – and we may actually be surprised how he employs these weapons. Reading him on Fernandez makes it pretty clear that he’s creative, and he’ll certainly change his style to fit the talent he has.

by Eben Calder on Aug 30, 2008 10:19 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Good thoughts .... all of those Eben.

I remember telling him how impressed I was with a player during summer league. In Avery's unique voice, he replied, "Marc, it's summer league." I

by TwoDeep on Aug 30, 2008 11:23 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Guess who has the highest PER for the Blazers? Hint, it isn't who you think.
Small
New B-Roy is the Old Kobe
The_dude_small
Stats 101: Whats The Deal? Let Me Explain...
Broyhope_small
First Rose Garden Game Redux...
Troll_stone_cropped_small
Nate in the land of the giants

Recent FanPosts

Screen_shot_2009-11-03_at_9
Looking to Consolidate the Blazers Talent? Well Guess Who has the Highest +/-? Also Blazers vs. Grizzlies Game Preview
Dsc_6704
"Per 48 Minutes" stats = Good news for Bayless
Copy_of_dcp_2180_small
09/10 junk
Meaccident_small
Most encouraging signs from the early season
Imported_photos_00004_small
Blazers Vs Timberwolves 10/8/09 Review
Small
How to consolidate?
Small
The Sched Ahead -- 11/09/09 Week Three, Primoris Annus Blazerium Dominatium
Small
Is Bynum the New Oden
Small
Brandon (old or new) is NOT Kobe (old or new) w/Poll
1-5-2009_007_small
NBA League Pass Blazer feeds???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

marty's buzzer beating dunk
Brandon Roy Wallpaper
Chad Ford (Insider): Travis Outlaw "Probably Won't Be Re-Signed"
Manu catches a bat during game. live coverage

ps
check out blair at the begining of video he freaks like a girl
Start Miller

Recent FanShots

Basketball Stats for Beginners...
So Bayless and T.I. are related right??
This chick will bring the toughness that the Blazers need to stop the other teams best players. Sign her KP!!!!
Rudy openly expresses disgruntlement
Charlie Rosen critiques the Blazers
McMillan said the key to having success on the road comes down to one...
NBA Top 10 From Last Night
I hope to see a LOT more of this during the season...nothing better than seeing Oden get block of the night.
Jaynes Weighs in on Blake / Miller / Roy
Viva la 3-Guard! T-Wolves Recap, at Loaded Orygun

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm