Were You There?
Like it or not..
I'm a Blazer fan. I have been for at least a year. I'm not an Oden-on-clinger (I actually wish we'd drafted Durant). I'm not a .500-on-clinger (to me, that's not so impressive), I'm not a potential-on-clinger (take the potential of my parenthetical comment and imagine what it could do in a year or two).
I live here. In Portland. Portland's my home, and I follow the Blazers. I didn't have the opportunity to do so when they were down-and-out - I didn't live here and couldn't have cared less. The only time the Portland Trail Blazers entered my New York-ass radar was when the magical Bulls were matched up against some team with Clyde Drexler in Sega's "Bulls vs. Blazers" video game. In fact, lifelong basketball fan that I am, I didn't even care about the Blazers the first two years I lived in this city.
That said, I have since come to love the Blazers. It pained me to cut Trout's statistical prospects from my fantasy team last year. I didn't have cable, yet I managed to find sports bars (Claudia's, mostly) that aired hometown games and catch them there. I actually attended games, and cheered, and followed, and worried.

I'm a Blazers Fan
No, allow me to repeat that - I am a Blazers fan. I follow their every move, I think of cockamamie trade ideas, I pray that KP can work magic once again with every draft. That said, I've only been following the Blazers for - get ready for it - a little over a year. Is that so bad?
Am I on the outs? Is, say, an Oden-lover (forgive me for never even knowing the banned acronym) too late or just in time? Granted, people take issue with hitchers-on (particularly when a team's been hurting so badly). I remember living in New England when the Denver Broncos won the Super Bowl and my friend's father bought hats for all his family with the winning team's insignia adorning the top. That's not sportsmanship. That's not even fans-manship. That's just terrible.
That's also not what I'm talking about. What I'm speaking to is more of a "were you there when it mattered" kind of outlook. Say, for instance, Kobe scores 82. As Laker fans are known for showing up just before halftime, are they entitled to claiming to having "been there" at a once-in-a-lifetime spectacle or were they casual witnesses to transcendent greatness? Were the fans that showed up before the first quarter more entitled to the bravado? Were season-ticket holders that stuck with them post-Shaq even more entitled? Pre-Magic? Pre-West? Pre-Mikan?
So..
Say the Blazers are as good as many of us BEdgers think and are champions once or more - where is the line of true fanhood drawn, if it is? Does suffering predicate commitment? Does the excelsior of victory dilute itself without yearning?
If, say, we were to win one or more championships, do the accolades fall most upon those longest amongst us? The longest suffering? Does being a fan during the JailBlazer era give one entre or does it take more? Does a JailBlazer fan outrank an Oden fan? Does a Rip City fan outrank a JailBlazer fan? Does a Blazers 2k0_ fan stand a chance against either?
6 recs |
122
comments
| Add your comment
Comments
Sottie Pippen? He drinks?
Sorry. I’ll redeem myself by reccing your post. I’m also reccing it because it’s worthy of being recced. My husband is a transplanted New Yorker and couldn’t care less about sports. He’s been tolerant, if not always understanding, of my Blazer fanaticism for lo these many years.
"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar
by annthefan on
Aug 1, 2008 5:57 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
I wrote this last summer in another thread....I still think it
” I was thinking bout this the other day and decided that it doesn’t matter WHEN you jump on the Bandwagon….but how long you ride.
I jumped on both the Blazers and Raiders wagon in ‘77 (15 years old at the time). I have been life long fans of both. I think I’m gonna cut some slack to these newcomers in hopes that they will say (in about 20 yrs)something like “I became a fan the 1st time I saw Greg Oden in a Blazers uniform’”
Does that answer your question?
Homer: "Oh no!! A Bear is eating my father!." (On seeing Selma kissing Grampa)
by 92wastheyear on
Aug 1, 2008 6:16 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
Yep, how long you ride. That's it.
And continuing to ride when the seas are stormy and all looks lost.
I remember telling him how impressed I was with a player during summer league. In Avery's unique voice, he replied, "Marc, it's summer league." I
by TwoDeep on
Aug 1, 2008 9:53 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
You stud!
I became a Raider fan that same year, much to the chagrin of my father who was from North Dakota and an avid Vikings fan. I thought he was going to disown me as a heretic while we watched that super bowl (I was 8) . I had become a Blazer fan the year before. Thank God we both loved the Blazers or I think I would have been in trouble.
P.S. Out of spite I think, he got me a Cleveland Brown jacket to wear to school that year…so mean.
by Wotan on
Aug 5, 2008 1:22 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Ah yes, Blazers and Raiders.
The only two teams that matter in professional sports.
by Bskey on
Aug 7, 2008 5:52 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
deserving satisfaction?
I just think it will be sweeter for some. No offense, but fans who jumped on board that fateful day in May of 2007 are not going to have the same Blazer committment as those who’ve been around since the 70’s, 80’s, 90’s teams. Good post though.
Love is blind.
God is love.
Ray Charles is God.
by koyote on
Aug 1, 2008 7:30 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
Satisfaction comes from within
I could not careless about hangers on. My joy comes from watching my team win. I buy their gear, wear it to opposing teams’ stadiums, yell at the TV and tick of the wife when she’s trying to sleep, goo-goo and gaa-gaa at post-game stats, bla bla bla.
I never had the slightest loyalty or fandom for the Bulls when they were winning everything. I admired their team and its abilities (much to my consternation) but I never did any of the above listed fan things.
I expect the Blazers’ fan base to grow as they get better. It almost has to. Welcome one and all. What I don’t like is talk like: “Yeah, well I’m a bigger fan than you because …”
That’s just silly. Got no time for it.
“Pride never helps, it only hurts.” - Marcellus Wallas, Pulp Fiction.
“The Tao that can be named is not the eternal Tao.” - Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching
“Rock out with yer c*ck out.”—Drunk Girl, Doug Fir Lounge, 10 am New Years Day 1999
Live at Doug Fir Lounge on Aug. 7, 9 pm -- YEAR 5000 -- http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Aug 1, 2008 8:07 AM PDT
reply
2 recs
No kidding!
I wish I could rec this post twice.
Enjoy your satisfaction with the team. Who cares if people jump on the bandwagon? Let them have their fun. Maybe some of them will jump on for the duration and become a part of the next generation of die-hard Blazer fans.
Jerryd Bayless has two emotions: Kill and Win.
"I think it’s going to be very beautiful game next year."
-Nicolas Batum
by rockingharder on
Aug 1, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Oh Man,
I know fatty is cringing at not being able to type absurd runs-ins and sentence structures, lots of ”*’s” in respone to this post…
Ball Don't Lie
by bothteamsplayedhard on
Aug 1, 2008 8:23 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
I do think...
... it will mean more to those who have been fans for the longest, but I have no problem with people becoming Blazer fans now. If they remain fans through our next rebuilding project, then there is no doubt they are true fans. If they stop being fans when our run is over, then they are bandwagon fans (which is fine- it just means they aren’t true fans).
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on
Aug 1, 2008 9:18 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
You still wish Portland drafted Durant?
Even after he stunk up the league last season? Obviously he won rookie of the year (based purely upon lack of competition and the proverbial green light), but the Sonics’ offensive efficiency was almost exactly the same with him on or off the court (not surprising – if you shoot 35-40% to get your 20 ppg, you’re probably hurting more than helping), and their defensive efficiency was ten points worse (which is a ton). So, whether you blame it on the coaches or whatever, the fact is that, for the most part, Durant was making his (already terrible) team worse.
Would you be more excited about keeping Pryz at the five spot and bringing in Durant at the three, or working Webster/Outlaw at the three and Oden/Pryz at the five? Consider, too, that KP will have the opportunity to bring in even more help either via a trade or free agency. Is it easier to sign or trade for a useful small forward, or a useful center?
No contest, in my book. Bayless-Roy/Rudy-Durant-LA-Pryz/FA is a good young foundation. Promising, for sure. That team could win some games. Bayless-Roy/Rudy-Webster/Outlaw/FA-Oden? That’s a potential dynasty. Screw winning some games – that team could win some championships.
Bayless isn't the second coming of Jordan.
Jordan was the first coming of Bayless.
by KP Corleone on
Aug 1, 2008 9:18 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
jury very much still out on Durant
He wasn’t great at all last year, but he was in a bad situation and he got better towards the end of the season. I still think he’s going to be a stud, but I’m very comfortable with the Oden pick (as long as he stays healthy).
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on
Aug 1, 2008 9:59 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
that is a pretty big if
I’d say. I like Durant, and I feel really bad that he has to play in O*. Still, it’s going to be simply electric when Oden walks out on the floor. that will be a beautiful day
by 50backflips on
Aug 1, 2008 10:27 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Just what we need
Another SF who is helpless on defense but I do feel sorry for him geting stuck in such a sorry situation and I am sure that he is thinking exit plans.
by southern oregon on
Aug 1, 2008 5:01 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
I wish we would have drafted Durant too.
Maybe I’ll change my mind when he finally plays in his first NBA game. Or maybe it will take a complete season.
BTW, Durant was heavily defended every game as the opposition knew that’s where the ball was going to go. “stunk up the league”? Considering the circumstances, Durant did a credible job, improving as the season wore on.
I remember telling him how impressed I was with a player during summer league. In Avery's unique voice, he replied, "Marc, it's summer league." I
by TwoDeep on
Aug 1, 2008 10:03 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
dang .... "he" of course is Oden.
I remember telling him how impressed I was with a player during summer league. In Avery's unique voice, he replied, "Marc, it's summer league." I
by TwoDeep on
Aug 1, 2008 10:56 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Durant is a top tier forward already.
To say anything less is ridiculous. I’d take him over Beasley or Rose any day.
Krikey! Kiteboarding is Kewl!
by prezofdeath on
Aug 1, 2008 10:11 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Top tier forward?
The other comments above I can live with (and for the most part agree with). Jury is definitely still out. He’ll likely develop into a solid player, assuming he can pack on an ounce or two of muscle and start guarding SFs intstead of SGs.
But top tier forward already? He’s not even close to being close. In fact, he’s closer to Martell or Trout than he is the top tier of guys like LeBron, Nowitzki – hell, even the solid, middle tier guys like Tayshaun, Hedo,etc. are light-years ahead. I’d say he’s a bottom tier forward with the clear potential to jump past the middle tier guys to the top tier.
I do agree with you though – I’d take him over Beasley or Rose. But (wait for it) not over Bayless. I’m sure the whole world will disagree, laugh, snicker, deride, etc, but that’s just my take. He’s got a long, long way to go, and I think Bayless will be a more balanced and valuable player (read: efficiency and defense) from day one.
Bayless isn't the second coming of Jordan.
Jordan was the first coming of Bayless.
by KP Corleone on
Aug 1, 2008 12:24 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
wow
you really see that much in Bayless? If you are right on him and Oden, its not even going to be fair.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on
Aug 1, 2008 1:17 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Hey, KP Corleone is technically an 'outsider' still
Coming to Blazers Edge as a fan of Oden and of KP, so we can at LEAST say he isn’t saying this stuff as a homer!
I think Durant will be great, but his rookie year was… well, there are a lot of excuses for it. GOOD excuses, all good excuses. He’s 19, and I always give the benefit of the doubt to young NBAers. I was a big fan of his last year, even played Devils Advocate for him leading up to the draft.
He took a lot, lot, lot of bad shots and it bugged me how they brought him along. He can be so much more than a gunner.
But, it was one season and he has enormous potential.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
Aug 1, 2008 1:37 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Idiot, maybe, but homer, no. ;-)
I just think Bayless’s athleticism and skill level, as far as scoring is concerned, are off the charts for a 19 year-old (he runs and cuts like Devon Harris, shoots like Pargo, takes it to the rack like Ellis, and jumps like… actually I can’t think of a 6’2” to 6’3” guy who jumps that high that quick). His opportunity in Portland is off the charts (just a perfect fit, for reasons better articulated by others). His attitude, poise, intelligence, and work ethic seem to be off the charts (what 19 year-old says he’ll bring “leadership” to an NBA team with a straight face, and you believe him?).
There are far more question marks about Durant, many of them related to his circumstances. Will he ever adjust to not being able to jack threes whenever he feels like it? Will he figure out that he’s not yet a great shooter and needs to focus more on his countless moves to the bucket? Is he actually aware that his teammates are still in the building when he has the ball in his hands? Will he ever be strong enough (or quick enough) to guard elite NBA athletes (can you imagine him, ever, guarding LeBron? I would be concerned for his safety).
Right now, Durant’s like a much (much, much) higher ceiling version of Outlaw and Webster combined (Trout’s midrange game, Webster’s shot, but amazingly, worse D than either).
The doubts about Bayless are these – can he pass, or is he a one-dimensional guy? Will his shot become consistent? But either way, he’s got an edge, he’s ridiculously athletic, he can D up point guards, and he can take it to the rack. Those are NBA skills that can contribute (with a bunch of other pieces) to a championship. He’s a low risk, huge reward guy. Durant is also huge reward, but he’s high risk. That’s my spin. Insane as it is, I’m sticking to it.
(As an aside, Oden is also high risk, huge reward. Obviously, there’s primarily one question. Can he stay healthy? Needless to say, the jury is out, and has been out for a long time. In fact, I’m not even sure where they went – the judge might have just given up and sent them home.)
Bayless isn't the second coming of Jordan.
Jordan was the first coming of Bayless.
by KP Corleone on
Aug 1, 2008 4:57 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
The reason I like Bayless
Is his potential for defense, even if he is more of a SG than a PG.
Normally, I HATE undersized shooting guards forced into a PG role because they are short. It never works well, and you always have to heavily compensate for their shortcomings. They get stuck in that Twilight Zone between too short to guard SGs, too slow to guard PGs (or just horrible at it, ala Monta Ellis), and while those “combo” guards can often put up decent numbers they almost always seem to hurt more than help.
The key to this working here, even if Bayless is a SG on offense, is Brandon Roy. He covers up any POTENTIAL weak playmaking Bayless might have.
Now, I don’t think or know Bayless will have playmaking problems, but it does seem to be the question mark regarding his game. He DID have 4 assists a game in college, and that’s pretty dang good on a poor team where (like in Summer League) you gotta do all the scoring as well.
If Bayless couldn’t guard PGs, we’d be back to the same problem, except with more offense (hopefully). His defense and Roy’s playmaking from the SG spot makes everything work perfectly.
Gives Roy a great target to get assists with, another attacker to help a stagnant offense, etc. Switch up on defense, badabing we’re champions.
Before we got Rudy, I foresaw an eventual Rudy/Roy backcourt where we just use team defense on the quick PGs of the league. Now, I think Bayless will be able to guard them well and there will still be plenty of time and lineups to use Rudy as well—because I haven’t forgot about him. I got high, very high hopes for him and I love how he looks on offense. His passing is what has impressed me the most, and we can only wish Bayless can do 64.8% of what Rudy looks like he can do with the ball.
I don’t think you’re an idiot OR a homer. I’m a huge homer! Plus, I’ve been legally categorized by the State as an idiot :-( So I would know.
I dunno if Bayless > Durant, but I definitely think we need a guy who can guard PGs and score to boot more than we need a scoring SF. We need the potential of what Bayless might be over the potential of Durant. I still like our Oden pick.
Oden is my man and I think he’ll be incredible. No one can stop him. Our roster is completely unfair.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
Aug 2, 2008 1:39 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Well said
That’s the way I should’ve put it – it’s not that Bayless > Durant, but that Portland + Bayless > Portland + Durant. Same, except the difference is wider, for Oden.
The ideal incoming piece of the puzzle for Portland would be a guy who comes in at the one, plays great defense on PGs, brings a little toughness, takes SOME of the playmaking/scoring pressure off Roy, and is comfortable at the same time playing off the ball for extended stretches. There couldn’t be a better fit for Bayless (or for Portland). He’ll have a great chance to maximize his potential because of the circumstances (whereas Durant, unfortunately, is looking at the mirror image of those circumstances).
That should have been (I think I focused too much on skills) my primary point about the ridiculous hypothetical Rose trade, as well – Rose may be the most likely player to develop into a Chris Paul type guy, but that’s not what the Blazers need. (However, I also do think the public perception of Rose has been melded into something he’s not. What he is, is a ridiculous physical specimen who plays the point. What he’s not is a guy who has NBA point guard skills right now. Ok, I officially retire the topic!)
As for Durant, of course, a lot of teams would love his potential to develop into an unstoppable offensive weapon. The Blazers just aren’t one of those teams. I think that’s why they went after a defensive “upside” three guy in Batum (a new kind of upside), as opposed to an offensive upside guy like Donte Greene.
Bayless isn't the second coming of Jordan.
Jordan was the first coming of Bayless.
by KP Corleone on
Aug 2, 2008 8:29 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
They played him at SG to prevent him from getting beaten up while his body fills out
That’s certainly not his correct position. He is a forward. And he will be a special player if he continues to improve his outside shooting, slashing and especially his shot selection (he still takes too many shots that he should rather pass up). If not, he doesn’t have that much upside. But I’m very confident he will. He is already showing the ability to take over games. In a few years, he will be great.
Odenied: Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...
by Norsktroll on
Aug 1, 2008 1:49 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Agreed.
Crazy that he guarded SGs last year. But can he guard SFs? Can he get stronger?
But yeah, he has shown that he has that special something, at least in spurts. The game towards the end of the year when he hit two buzzer beaters from three was ridiculous.
He’ll be an elite scorer, there’s no doubt. But will he be efficient, can he play D, and will he win?
Bayless isn't the second coming of Jordan.
Jordan was the first coming of Bayless.
by KP Corleone on
Aug 1, 2008 5:00 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
I am not sure that moved him forward
(seemed more backward to me)!
Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."
by lee3022 on
Aug 2, 2008 8:23 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
didnt he spend the season
getting double teamed. i didnt watch his games, just read that since he was acting as the primary scoring option, that he was catching alot of defencive heat.
"If I was in anyway unclear(,) I am implying that Dave is a serial murder(er)."
---jonestr on Aug 3, 2008 12:25 AM PDT
by ptwnblzr on
Aug 3, 2008 1:48 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
let me lay out a little case for Beasley
I think Beasley is going to turn out to be a better pro based on my limited viewing of his summer league.
He already attacks the rim which took KD most of the year to do.
He has beautiful shot mechanics. KD’s are solid but Beasley is really fluid and I think he will sell shot fakes well which will open up his devastating driving game.
He has a lot more post game going towards the basket than KD.
He has a much more developed body that should easily put on bulk. i think the jury is still out if KD can get the strength and weight he needs to be able to play down low and expand his game.
He is left handed which is hard to guard even when you know it is coming. I think this explains some of ZBo’s success.
I guess time will tell, but I am excited to watch both of them play hard on offense and then not make it over half court to play D.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Aug 1, 2008 1:14 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
He's tough to read.
Beasley could be NBA MVP one day, or he could be MVP of the rec league at some asylum. It’s just hard to say. He’ll be fun to watch this year. He’s a matchup problem already for most teams in the league.
Bayless isn't the second coming of Jordan.
Jordan was the first coming of Bayless.
by KP Corleone on
Aug 1, 2008 5:03 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
He seems like
a dude who just needs some guidance, but he is not a bad dude. He just like to play pranks. Seems very Arenas to me.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Aug 1, 2008 7:28 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
I am the true fan
You are on time only if I let you ride along. Hope that clarifies things.
By the way, I was a fan since 1970. I chucked my fandom in during the thug years, even when the thugs were still winning. I reclaimed it about a year and a half ago, even while we still were losing a lot of games.
Other people don't have as much practice at being wrong as I do -- HT, timbo
by jscot on
Aug 1, 2008 10:29 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
I Knew your name, "JSCOT".
Now I know also your first name, “Everybody“
The Midnight Rambler
by amlmart1 on
Aug 1, 2008 2:17 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Gas for $1.45
That is so 80’s! Nice find.
Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."
by lee3022 on
Aug 2, 2008 8:31 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Yeah, we are getting mad...
mad… mad…MAD…MAD…MAD MAX!
The Midnight Rambler
by amlmart1 on
Aug 2, 2008 9:51 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
It's OK, everyone...
I reserved his seat during the ‘thug’ years. That was jscot’s jacket.
I’m a bandwagon fan as I only started rooting for the Blazers in 1977. My excuse was that I was 8 at the time.
In retrospect, 1977 was a kick-@$$ year. We had the Blazers championship, Star Wars and The Clash’s first album. Not bad.
by DonkeyShins on
Aug 5, 2008 4:53 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
I was there!
I was at that wonderful game in June of 1977 when we beat Philly. It remains one of my top three memories in life (My Wedding day is #1 just in case my wife reads this)
I have have been an avid fan ever since and even before, but I will say my interest definately rose the day Paul Allen bought this team. It’s never too late for a person to catch Blazermania! We should welcome any and all new fans, ESPECIALLY the Sonic fans after what has happened up there. That rivalry has produced so many good games over the years and I think the support that Blazer Fans have shown Sonic fans in their time of need is a credit to all! Go Blazers!!!!
by PHXBlazerFan on
Aug 1, 2008 10:56 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
Wow!
You musta gone nuts.
I can’t even imagine (although I try every day.)
Live at Doug Fir Lounge on Aug. 7, 9 pm -- YEAR 5000 -- http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Aug 1, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Admitted bandwagon fan
Well, maybe not quite that bad, but I definitely lost interest in the Blazers during the darker years of this decade. I was a huge fan of the Clyde era Blazers. I remember listening to the games on the radio during the finals with Detroit and being so stressed out I had to walk outside for a bit (Curse you Bill Laimbeer!!!). Probably somewhere around 2002 or ‘03 I was no longer able to recite the entire Blazers roster (Trader Bob’s frequent changes didn’t help). I found myself drifting away.
I moved to Washington somewhere back then and even figured I should be a Sonics fan since I was so disappointed with the Blazers and, heck, the Sonics were my home team now right? Yet I could never take any joy in a Sonics victory and always found myself creeping back in the dead of night to check Blazers box scores…who did we draft….will we ever make the playoffs again?
The 2006 draft brought me back from curious onlooker to casual fan, and the 2007 draft cemented me back squarely in the middle of fandom. For me, the management of the team and the personalities we had were what made me shy away from the team, not just those pitiful win/loss records.
Later still I found Blazersedge. I believe a full recovery is at hand.
So to answer your question, when the Blazers win their next championship, I plan to celebrate with the best of them…but I probably won’t be wearing a Bonzi Wells jersey.
...and it’s good that Sonics fan thing didn’t work out!
by lukeyhere on
Aug 1, 2008 11:54 AM PDT
reply
0 recs
Doesn't sound like Bandwagon at all
I am sure that many followed much the same path in their fandom. It was admittedly different from my path but it is a legit path considering the path that the franchise took. Glad to have you back in the fold
Homer: "Oh no!! A Bear is eating my father!." (On seeing Selma kissing Grampa)
by 92wastheyear on
Aug 1, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
I completely understand
I could never be a Sonics fan, but there was definitely a time where I didn’t follow close enough to recite the roster or the record. Those were dark days, but I still wore the Blazers gear, and people would literally laugh at me and ask me if I was high. I think the anti-Blazer sentiment in this city was pretty high in the early part of the 2000’s. It was an uncomfortable time to root for the team you loved. So sometimes it is frustrating as a fan because these same folks who were dogging you 3 years ago are saying “Oden this…and Roy that..” excited about our future. However I think we should embrace all fans because we all had to start somewhere and it sure wasn’t going to be during the “Jailblazer era.”
by The Natural ala Mode on
Aug 1, 2008 4:47 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
I don't think it matters when you started (or start) rooting for the Blazers...
if you’re rooting for them and they win, you should feel some reward. However, I do think the quality of the reward may differ.
If you’re a moderate NBA fan and your team is, say, Orlando, and they get bumped out of the playoffs early, but you still want to root for a team, you “adopt” a team. You don’t like any of the remaining teams in the East, you don’t like the remaining teams in the West, you never got to watch much of Portland as you’re in the complete opposite corner of the nation and they’re new and exciting, so you decide to take this plucky young Portland squad as yours. So this is your horse for the playoffs, they end up winning, and you feel satisfied. Maybe this is your new favorite Western Conference team, the team you root for when your beloved Magic are out. You still feel that “YES!” when they win.
If you’re a slight sports fan and always watch championships and not much else and Portland and Detroit make the Finals, and you hate Detroit (for obvious reasons) so you root for the Blazers, and they win, you feel some reward. Even if it’s the reward of seeing the Pistons lose, the Blazers gave that reward to you.
If you’re a long-term fan, someone who has devoted years, decades even, of time and energy and money and fandom and love and passion for this team and suffered through so many close calls and being second best and coming up just short and getting to the Finals at the absolute wrong time (MJ in his prime) and watching 15-point 4th quarter leads get blown and going through the Dark Years and you’ve lost sleep and been depressed for weeks and broken remote controls by throwing them at the wall after heart-wrenching losses (I’ve never done this, but would totally understand if anyone has) and felt like you did that one time in high school when your girlfriend dumped you so you didn’t want to wake up for days and you’ve felt torn about your relationship with this team because you love it so much and it makes you excited and happy and giddy but usually ends up not giving you that taste of ultimate victory… if that’s you, a championship might just be slightly more rewarding than the guy from the other two options.
I’d guess that most of the people in this forum are in that 3rd category. Even if you haven’t spent that much time as a fan, if your heart’s in it that way, if you truly are high on the ups and low on the downs, if when the day comes that this team finally captures that elusive championship and it goes down as one of your Top Ten Greatest Days of your Life, you might as well have spent a lifetime as a fan.
It will easily be one of my Top Ten Greatest Days of my Life.
Ba da da da dah... I'm BEdgin' it!
by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on
Aug 1, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
That sums it up superbly
See the post above and you will see that I have been a Blazer fan (and Raiders fan) since 77. That being said…while I have strong fondness for that magical 77 team…...I freakin’ loved the 90-93 teams. Why? Precisely because I had invested 13 years to my fandom at that point (imagine if they had actually won one of those finals). This current team is gonna make my dreams come true (or break my heart), but I promise you the feeling will be even stronger because of the 30+ years of fandom acumulated.
PS I became a Raiders fan because I was tired of seeing the Steelers win everything and bet this other kid $5 the Raiders would beat the Steelers in the playoffs (AFC title game I think) and they did and went on to win the Superbowl. So I guess that it can be said that my fandom has 4 championships.
Homer: "Oh no!! A Bear is eating my father!." (On seeing Selma kissing Grampa)
by 92wastheyear on
Aug 1, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
B-Roy bandwagoneer
I was at UW (go ahead and boo) while he was there. Was a huge fan. East coaster now, but when he got drafted by Portland, I started watching. Haven’t stopped. Before then I was just a college ball fan.
I mostly lurk here except for the jersey contests, and I only get to go to one game a year (saw that stinker in DC last year), but I think I’m a pretty decent fan.
by zenbowl on
Aug 1, 2008 12:36 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
Well, since you asked
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Jerryd Bayless has two emotions: Kill and Win.
"I think it’s going to be very beautiful game next year."
-Nicolas Batum
by rockingharder on
Aug 1, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
going to school with
and following a star before and during his tenure on a team makes you a lagitamate fan of said team.
"If I was in anyway unclear(,) I am implying that Dave is a serial murder(er)."
---jonestr on Aug 3, 2008 12:25 AM PDT
by ptwnblzr on
Aug 3, 2008 2:03 AM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Good Read
I was a Lakers fan until I my beloved team had their butt handed to them in the playoffs by the Celtics this year. I saw what Jerryd Bayless was doing in the summer league and I thought, “Man, when they add that guy to Roy, Aldridge, Outlaw, and Oden, they’re going to be unbeatable.” I decided right then and there, that I was was going to be a Blazers fan, so that I could say that I was a fan of the team before they were good. I’m going to ride this bandwagon of into the sunset.
by tominhawaii on
Aug 1, 2008 12:39 PM PDT
reply
0 recs
+1
I’m really more a fan of the summer league club than the actual Blazers. They should have their own name and blog so I can make my alliegances more readily apparent. The Baby Blazers? That could be misconstrued. We’ll come up with something.
Along these lines, I am not acknowledging Nate as the head coach this year. Make no mistake, the train stops with Monty.
Bayless isn't the second coming of Jordan.
Jordan was the first coming of Bayless.
by KP Corleone on
Aug 1, 2008 12:46 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
After what happened to the Baby Bulls
maybe the “Baby Penguins” would be better?
Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."
by lee3022 on
Aug 2, 2008 8:38 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
The sunsets
In West Maui are average but my people there are from OR and they get all the games.
by southern oregon on
Aug 1, 2008 5:10 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
I killed me a bear when I was only 3.
OU812? I81B4U, USOB!
by tominhawaii on
Aug 1, 2008 6:07 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
King of the wild frontier
Homer: "Oh no!! A Bear is eating my father!." (On seeing Selma kissing Grampa)
by 92wastheyear on
Aug 1, 2008 6:49 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
What did you eat and why are you so adamant about it?
"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar
by annthefan on
Aug 1, 2008 8:13 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Bear meat
Is greasy and i dont really care for it.
by southern oregon on
Aug 1, 2008 8:19 PM PDT
up
reply
0 recs
Kilt myself a bar, when I was 57 (I didn't shoot straight at 3),
and again when I was 59.
Not greasy at all. Delicious. Depends totally on what they’ve been eating. These two were on berries and roots. If they eat carrion they’re bad. If they’ve be


