Blazer's Edge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


Cap Terms

After we posted the link to Storyteller's updated contract information B.E. member 50backflips (Dude, doesn’t that make you dizzy?) requested some clarification on the terminology and the various categories salaries can fall into for cap purposes…in plain English please.  This seemed like a good idea in general, so we’ll do it.

This is a layman’s guide to salary cap distinctions, based on the categories at Storyteller's site.  What you’re going to read will cover the majority of the situations.  There are exceptions in some cases, but in my experience those are rare enough that the six paragraphs it takes to explain them don’t justify the time and confusion they cause.  In the vast majority of cases, the following will hold true.  This ought to do you unless you want to be the next Tom Penn.

Player Option: (Peach-colored on Storyteller’s site)

This is simple.  Some contracts are structured to let the PLAYER decide whether he wants to finish the contract at the agreed-upon price or end the contract early and become a free agent.  In the case of a guy like Raef LaFrentz, it was clearly to his advantage to play out the last year of his contract in 2008-09.  He’s due to be paid $12.7 million and he couldn’t get anywhere near that on the open market.  On the other hand if all goes well this season Carlos Boozer of Utah may well opt out of the last year of his contract, worth $12.3 million in 2009-10.  With his production he could likely demand a raise and get it.  Also there are rumors he may want to switch teams.  Player options put a lot of leverage in the player’s hands and you have to be in a reasonably good bargaining position to get one added to your contract.

Team Option:  (Grey-colored on Storyteller’s site)

This works on the same principle as the Player Option, except here the TEAM gets to decide whether it will retain the player until the end of his contract or opt out early.  The Blazers structured Steve Blake’s and Travis Outlaw’s contracts to have a team option for 2009-10.  If those players fit and the Blazers think they’re paying a reasonable price for services rendered they will pick up the option and pay those guys the amount shown.  Should the Blazers anticipate needing more cap space in the summer of 2009 they have the option of terminating the contract and turning Blake and Outlaw loose into free agency after the 2008-09 season.

Note that the rookie contract scale calls for each team to have a team option on first-round draft picks after their third and fourth years, so you’ll see a lot of grey on the charts.

Adjusted:  (Cyan-colored on Storyteller’s site)

These are little accounting bumps along the road, either because of arcane cap rules or because we have incomplete information about a player’s salary.  For the most part these adjustments are minimal and not worth paying attention to.

Unsigned Draft Pick:  (Green-colored on Storyteller’s site)

The rookie salary scale calls for each first-round pick to make a target amount in their first two seasons.  Each team can negotiate with its draft picks for a contract ranging from 80%-120% of that target amount.  Until the draft pick actually signs a contract, though, a hold is placed on the team’s cap for the exact target amount.  Once they sign a contract this hold disappears and is replaced by the actual salary of the new contract.

Note that the cap hold does not translate into trade value for purposes of matching salaries in a trade.  Technically the Blazers still own the rights to #13 pick Brandon Rush and Indiana owns the rights to #11 pick Jerryd Bayless because that trade has not been officially executed yet due to salary-matching needs.  Rush puts a hold of $1.5 million on Portland’s 2008-09 cap and Bayless a $1.66 million hold on Indiana’s because neither has signed.  But neither of those figures count as salary for matching purposes in the trade.  Draft picks are valued at $0 for salary-matching purposes until they actually sign.  Only the salaries of Jarrett Jack, Josh McRoberts, and Ike Diogu make a difference in determining the legality of the trade until or unless Rush and Bayless sign a contract.

In other words, if you want to throw some names in a trade machine to see if a scenario works don’t bother throwing in new draft picks until they are signed.  Much like cabbage in the Weight Watcher’s plan you can add all of them you want for free.

Qualifying Offer:  (Yellow-colored on Storyteller’s site)

Qualifying offers mark the beginning of the end of the rookie contract period for first-round draft picks.  Each team has the option to make a qualifying offer following a first-round draft pick’s fourth season.  The amount of this offer is scaled by the player’s draft order, with higher picks mandating higher offers. 

The player has the option to accept the offer, which is always one year in length.  If the player takes this offer he plays for one more year and then becomes an unrestricted free agent following that year.  Or the player can reject the offer and instead become a restricted free agent following his fourth season.  Restricted free agents have the right to bargain with other NBA teams for the best contract terms they can get.  The player’s original team has the right to match any offer and retain the player’s services if desired.

The yellow-highlighted number on the salary charts shows you the amount of the qualifying offer.  Note the following:

--The team has the option to not make a qualifying offer when the time comes, thus wiping that amount off of their cap. 

--If the team makes an offer and the player rejects it, entering restricted free agency, then the team gets a hold placed against their cap which is generally 300% of the player’s previous year’s salary (not the yellow amount). 

So mark that yellow number with an asterisk in your mind.  That amount may count against the team’s cap in that year, but not necessarily.  It’s there mostly for your reference.

This is the big question with Martell Webster, Channing Frye, and Ike Diogu on our team.  We don’t know yet how much they will count against our cap next summer.  It could be the yellow number if they accept the one-year qualifying offer.  It could be 300% of this year’s salary if they reject the offer and become restricted free agents.  It could be nothing if the Blazers don’t make them an offer and instead just let them go.  Or it could be a different number entirely if the team and players negotiate new contracts before this all becomes an issue.  This gives everybody a chance to play “You Be the GM”.

BYC (Base Year Compensation) Players:  (Magenta-Pink-colored on Storyteller’s site)

Sit down and let me tell you a story, children.  Once upon a time, after the matching-salary rule was created to govern NBA trades, a very clever GM had an idea.  You see, this GM wanted to make a trade badly but he didn’t have the right salaries to do it.  So the clever GM said to himself, “I will just create the salary I need.”  So he called up the agent of his 13th-best player, Splurdly McGee, and said, “Hey Agent, what say I give old Splurdly a big, fat raise to make his contract worth exactly the amount I need to make this trade?”  The agent, being pure and ethical as all agents are, said, “Is that kosher?  After all, my client Splurdly isn’t that great of a player.  He’s not really worth that much.  What would the NBA think of the domino effect such a raise would undoubtedly cause?”  As it turned out the league didn’t think much of the plan.  So they instituted the Base Year Compensation rule.

The BYC rule says this:  If you just gave one of your players a big raise, the new salary amount is not going to count fully for purposes of matching trade salaries during the first year of his new contract.  This is designed to prevent teams from signing players to salaries based on cap/trade considerations instead of worth.

The BYC designation doesn’t do a darn thing to the cap of the team that owns the player.  If you see a number in pink that’s the exact number that counts against a team’s cap.  You can just add it in with all the rest.  If you’re not worried about trades the pink shading means nothing to you!

However the BYC designation does rear its ugly head when that team tries to trade a player.  How it works is this:

--The team receiving the player has to absorb the full amount of the salary highlighted in pink.

--But the team trading away the player can only take back half of that amount.  (There are exceptions to the exact amount, but don’t worry...it’s always less than the pink number.)

Example:  LeBron James was a BYC player for Cleveland last year.  His salary was roughly $13 million.  Had Cleveland wanted to trade him to Portland, then the Blazers would have to take LBJ’s $13 million salary under their cap but they could have only returned $6.5 million to the Cavs.  Since Portland was over the cap already, that wouldn’t have worked.  They didn’t have the $6.5 million of extra cap space to absorb that contract.

How can you make a trade involving a BYC player work?  You have three options:

1.  You can trade him to a team which is enough under the cap to absorb the difference.  For instance had Portland been $7 million under the cap last year then they could have happily said yes to Cleveland’s proposal.  They had $7 million in cap space, they traded $6.5 million in salary back to Cleveland in the deal, that leaves them a nice $13.5 million cap slot in which LeBron’s $13 million salary fits nicely.

2.  If the receiving team is over the cap, it can try to find a team (or teams) which are under the cap upon whom it can dump some contracts to make space.  For instance, had Kevin Pritchard fielded that call from Cleveland, after he got done peeing his pants in excitement he could have gotten on the phone to Charlotte and Memphis, both of whom were under the cap last year.  If he could have managed to trade away $6 million or so in contracts without taking anything back then that, with the contracts he would have given back to Cleveland, would have made enough room.  In other words Portland trades $6.5 million to the Cavs, $4.5 million to the Grizzlies, and $1.5 million to the Bobcats, which totals around $12.5 million, but takes back only Lebron’s $13 million contract in return.  Done and done.

3.  Obviously teams under the cap are rare, so scenarios 1 and 2 almost never happen.  The more common solution is to simply wait out the first year of the player’s new deal.  After that the BYC designation disappears and his salary is completely normal for trade matching purposes.

Hope that helps a little bit.  I’m sure if I forgot anything basic and important Storyteller will let us know soon.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

3 recs | Comment 15 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

So if a team is 1 dollar under the cap, and the team gives a player a 20% raise that player doesn’t have a BYC contract?

by BRoyInThe4th on Jul 4, 2008 2:22 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

As far as I can tell, yes

BYC only kicks in when the team is over the cap.

—Dave

by Dave on Jul 4, 2008 10:21 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes with one caveat

If a team signs their own FA to a new contract and uses the Bird or Early Bird exception to do so (because after signing the new contract, the team would be more than $100,000 over the cap) and gives the player more than a 20% raise, that player is BYC.

The important distinction (going back to BRoyInThe4th’s comment) is not whether the team is under the cap before the new contract is applied but whether the team is under the cap after the new contract is applied.

If, after a team gives a player a 25% raise, they are still 1 dollar under the cap, then no, that player is not BYC.

If a team is under the cap before re-signing the same player but is more than $100,000 over the cap after signing him (and they use Bird rights or Early Bird rights to sign him) then yes, he’s BYC.

I hope that makes sense.

by Storyteller on Jul 4, 2008 11:07 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And it explains why BRoy's scenario

wouldn’t be needed since if Team A was under the cap enough to absorb the raise for their own player(remember they end up under the cap after the raise) then they could of just made the trade conventionally and absorbed the difference in salary in the open cap space without giving the raise

"Some of Dave’s greatest gifts are unanswered posts."

by 92wastheyear on Jul 4, 2008 12:38 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wow!

That was really good Dave.

by TwoDeep on Jul 4, 2008 10:20 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Excellent explanation, Dave

I put a page of notes and explanations on my site as well, albeit much shorter and less informative than what you’ve written here (mostly just to explain the color designations):

http://www.storytellerscontracts.info/2.html

Just a couple of notes:

1) The “Adjusted” (cyan background) numbers occur when the league reimburses a team for portion of a veteran’s salary. Because the minimum amount of money that a player can make is based on how many years of service in the league he’s had, a minimum contract for a more experienced (and often older) player is more than for a less experienced player. The league doesn’t want personnel decisions of minimum contract players to be made solely on the basis of finances, So, if a player is on a one year contract for a minimum contract amount, the league guarantees that the team will have to pay him no more than what a 3rd year player would make on a minimum contract.

For 2007-08, any amount of these contracts over $770,610 was reimbursed back to the team and thus does not apply against the cap. The league does this to ‘level the playing field’ among free agents who would be signed to minimum contracts. A team doesn’t have to choose a 3rd year player over a 10th year player simply because of the amount of money they would make.

On my site, I put the actual amount of money that a player makes in the “year” column and the amount that the contract counts against the cap (after the reimbursement) in the “Actual” column. For example, in 2007-08, Scot Pollard actually made $1,129,590 but only $770,610 counted against Boston’s cap.

2) During the summer months, I try to include my best guesses as to the amount of cap holds that unsigned FA’s have against a team’s cap. These numbers have “Red” backgrounds.

3) Dave linked the actual page of salaries for 2007-08. Here’s the link for the page for 2008-09:

http://www.storytellerscontracts.info/7.html

This page gives a link to the 2008-09 salary page, as well as allowing you to access past years and other pages on the left side of the page. I’ll soon be adding an additional link to the 2008-09 team salary information (including my guesses as to trade exceptions owned by each team and other exception informtion).

4) I’m actually talking today with some friends who are much more web-savvy than I am. I’ve talked to them several times about helping me to improve the look and user-friendliness of my site, so hopefully improvements will be coming soon!

by Storyteller on Jul 4, 2008 10:57 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thanks Guys

Thanks Dave now I have a better undestanding of the NBA. So lets say we want to keep Martell, can we not offer him the qualifying offer, and cut him loose so he would not count against our cap, then get another player we want and after that give Martell the contract?

by RipCity on Jul 4, 2008 11:55 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yes and no

Yes they could do it. However they would be limited in the amount of a new contract they could offer Martell after ‘cutting him loose so he would not count’ against the Blazers’ cap. The type of scenario you paint is exactly why the rules are the way they are – otherwise teams could circumvent the cap in exactly the manner you propose.

Once he was given the Qualifying Offer, he would count against the cap in an amount of $11,313,399 until one of the following happened:

1) Martell signs a new contract with the Blazers. He then counts against the cap in the amount of his new deal.

2) Martell signs an offer sheet with another team and it is matched by the Blazers. He then counts against Portland’s cap in the amount of his new deal.

3) Martell signs an offer sheet and it is not matched by the Blazers. He then counts nothing against the Blazers’ cap.

4) Martell signs the Qualifying Offer of 1 year, $5,030,692. He then counts against Portland’s cap for that amount.

5) Portland withdraws the Qualifying Offer and renounces their Bird rights to Martell. He then counts nothing against the Blazers’ cap. However, the Blazers in losing their Bird rights, would be limited in signing Martell by the amount of cap room they had left.

So if cutting Martell gave the Blazers $15 million in cap space and they then signed another player for $10 million, they would only be able to offer Martell the $5 million in cap space left. They couldn’t offer him the $12 or so million that they could if they still held his Bird rights.

by Storyteller on Jul 4, 2008 12:09 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

thak you

I can now think about all the senarios that can come up with the Blazers

by RipCity on Jul 4, 2008 12:20 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ok

is there any dead lines that go in free agency or any other stuff?

by RipCity on Jul 4, 2008 12:22 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Most free agents

cannot be signed until July 9th. Other than that, I’m not sure what ‘other stuff’ means.

by Storyteller on Jul 5, 2008 3:08 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What about cash

I hear of trades all the time that “so and so was traded for someone else + cash considerations” ... does the cash have any impact on the salary matching rules?

by jamon51 on Jul 5, 2008 1:15 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Cash counts as $0

for purposes of matching salaries to make trades work. Same as unsigned or future draft picks.

by Storyteller on Jul 5, 2008 3:09 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Commitment
Small
Nicolas Batum interview in REVERSE (french mag) of July
Small
HAVE WE LOST OUR MINDS
N1313394467_27679_4745_small
Hedo Turkgolu: 7 Stages of grief (now 14)
Small
The Official I _______ Turkoglu Thread (UPDATED w/Poll)

Recent FanPosts

Sdc10356_small
Who reallly wears the pants in the family
Small
Blessing in Disguise
Nike_o_small
Why not Andre Miller?
100_4977_small
JD 7/5
Small
Creating an Offensive Advantage
Small
Interesting take. What are your thoughts?
Small
David Lee begets a SF in the Future
Peacock_small
Dimitris Diamantidis
Small
David Lee? Nate Robinson? general Panic, what gives?
Iraq_christmas__small
Why not Roy?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Greedo Turkoglu



"E lo tolo Pritchard????"
See Ya Later Hedo! It was fun while it lasted :)
fooled us!
Hedo Rejects Deal, Ends Talks
Hedo in red and black. Bustabucket whipped out the Photoshop

Recent FanShots

Victor Claver Video Interview
They do not teach pronouns at the Toronto Sun
New Canzano column re: Hedo
Think he'd sign for veteran's minimum?
The Ron Artest Soap Opera Reviewed (by timbo)
Monty Williams might be a top candidate for Wolves
How going after Lee makes sense
Blazers strike back, switch D-League co-affiliate from Toronto to Denver
Nothing to do with basketball
Just tired of Hedo talk

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

151054601_tp_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports