Blazer's Edge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Would Houston deal Battier now?

After hearing about the Artest deal, I couldn't help but think about the possibility of adding Battier to the Blazers.  Listening to the podcast they talked about it extensively and I think the Blazers would be silly not to strongly consider a deal for Battier.  I think the deal that makes sense for Portland would be Webster and Frye to Houston for Battier.  It matches salary wise.

From Portland's perspective this would be a great deal.  We would get a lock down perimeter defender and a good spot up shooter.  He is more of a veteran leader with some experience as well.  Another benefit is not having to deal with Webster and Frye's contract next summer.  Battier's contract is the same amount now but we won't have to worry about any qualifying offers or cap holds next summer that will help maximize our cap space.  The downside to the deal would be giving up on Webster before we see his full potential and also it may leave us thin at the back up forward position if Diogu is not healthy. 

From Houston's perspective I think they would benefit from this deal as well.  They get a young wing player in Webster that can come off the bench for Artest or McGrady now and eventually replace them in a few years.  They get Frye who could compliment their post players with his shooting.  I think he would play well with Ming, Scola or Landry.  Houston is lacking in outside shooting from the 4 or 5 spot.

Starting Five:  Blake, Roy, Battier, Aldridge and Oden.  Subs:  Bayless, Rudy, Outlaw, Diogu and Przybilla. 

Poll
If this deal were on the table would you make the trade? Webster and Frye to Houston for Shane Battier
Yes
259 votes
No
156 votes

415 votes | Poll has closed

6 recs | Comment 99 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

no, but maybe

if they through in a first round pick lottery, protected of course, I would do it.

by Zaron5551 on Jul 30, 2008 8:20 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

gahh!!

move that comma to before lottery

by Zaron5551 on Jul 30, 2008 8:21 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Are you crazy?

Come on now we need some serious Blazer fans on this post. If you could make this trade right now, then do it. Don’t waste a second and pull the trigger. If it cost us Outlaw and Frye then I would do it.

Please take a momment and think about next years line up…..? B Roy needs the ball….Oden will need the ball….Aldridge will need the ball….Rudy is going to need the ball…...Bayless will need the ball.

All of these players need touches to be effective. Battier has averaged only 7+ shoots a season and does not need the ball to be effective on the court. I think Outlaw is a really good player on our team and loved his 4th Q’s last year, but don’t let your homer vision blind you to the fact that Battier is the perfect role player for our team.

Do you realy think that Webster is going to be a Defensive stopper? or even Frye?

Who would you want sitting on the 3 pt line Battier or Frye? Who’s going to get back on defense?

Portland, please see the bigger picture and wish this trade to happen!!!!

Blazers NBA champs 2010-2011!

by The Earl of Dunk on Jul 30, 2008 9:11 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's not so much that this trade

might or might not make us better, it’s that we already have the team I want to watch.

Yes, eventually we will need to thin the roster. But I don’t think we know who needs to get thinned yet. The Blazer’s aren’t going deep into the playoffs this year with or without Battier. Come the trade deadline or next summer we’ll know who’s thin-worthy, but we don’t know that yet.

by raoulduke on Jul 30, 2008 10:11 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Hm..
All of these players need touches to be effective.

Even LMA? Even Oden, Bayless, who we haven’t even seen yet? This whole ‘they need touches to be effective’ argument people keep throwing out seems to be WAAAY overused to me. Gilbert Arenas – he needs touches to be effective, but when you lump peeps like LMA into that category, aren’t you basically saying “he needs to physically touch the ball to score a point with the ball”? Isn’t that everyone in the world?

I mean, only someone like Bruce Bowen, who hangs his hat on defense and seemingly nothing else, could possibly fit into the “doesn’t need touches” category. Even Shane put up almost 8 chucks a game last year – does he need the ball, too? Nothing personal, but I see this all the time here on BEdge and it’s kind of drivin’ me crazy.

"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan

by 12sharks on Jul 30, 2008 11:07 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I wouldn't say he hangs his hat on nothing else

He’s got that dirty/cheap-shot thing goin’ for him…

by Montavilla Steve on Jul 31, 2008 10:26 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Moving commas...

He didn´t throw Outlaw in the trade…If he would, your phrase would have been: “if they through in a first round pick lottery, I would do it, protected of course.”

The Midnight Rambler

by amlmart1 on Jul 31, 2008 2:46 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yea................no

i hate guys from duke…..

battier plays tough d, ill admit…but we dont need him

we need some one like him, but not at the expense of channing…martell too

by BroyTheTruth on Jul 30, 2008 8:34 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No way

I strongly dislike Battier for some reason. Just was never a fan. I’d much rather like to keep Webster and see if he can step up. Plus I’d hate giving away a guy that I feel like will turn out to be better. Don’t do it.

by DUCKinNY on Jul 30, 2008 8:38 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

funny I dont' mind the trade posts

But this is like the 20th just for this Battier Guy. You guys must really like him. Me I like Frye and Webster and their crazy potential.

by Blazersaurus on Jul 30, 2008 8:41 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Frye a starter?

Could you really ever see Frye as a starter? I like the guy, but no way.

Blazers NBA champs 2010-2011!

by The Earl of Dunk on Jul 30, 2008 9:15 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I could see him as a starter...

After a trade OR if LA goes out for a spell. Frye wants to play. Frye is not afraid to come off the bench but he knows he’s got to be ubur good to get minutes. He’s worked his little buffet of good-ass off this off season. We won’t be able to keep him forever if he’s just too good but for awhile we will and when he does get good we can make a big trade for his big trade value. The rich get richer.

by Blazersaurus on Jul 31, 2008 8:07 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I voted yes

I would have jumped at this prior to the draft, but I’m really wanting to see the team play as it currently stands. I’ve come to the conclusion that Battier is not young enough for KP to pull the trigger.

The biggest benefit is the dropping of the cap holds. That would give Portland more room after the season and make Darius a moot point. Portland would just let RLEC expire.

I’ve come around to think that KP is looking at getting Prince. We’d need a third team and I have been unable to make it work.
(If it was Webster and Frye for Prince, I’d do it yesterday.)

by parkinglotj on Jul 30, 2008 8:43 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It makes a lot of sense in a right now kind of way.

The potential to burn you five years down the road is what you worry about. But then again Frye and Webster might not be a part of this team at all even two years down the road. But then again are the Blazers good enough to be in “right now” or even “next three years then diminishing returns” mode yet?

Ugh…tough decision.

—Dave

by Dave on Jul 30, 2008 8:47 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The thing is that a deal would have to include Webster.

If you look at the per 36 min stats every young player who was with us the year previous, improved except, Jack, Sergio and Webster.

Jack got shipped out; Sergio, I feel, did not get the burn to show what he can do; and Webster simply fit better with the starting unit with his 3pt shooting, which Trout is learning to do. In addition, even though Outlaw has been in the league longer, he has outplayed Webster by only, 700 or so minutes, or about 24 games at 30mpg.

I would hate to give up Frye as Quick said that he will be the M-I Blazer this upcoming year, but that may be the only way to make the salary work, unless a 3rd team and RLEC is brought in.

by SpyderRyder on Jul 30, 2008 9:02 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree with Jason here

I don’t see any way Frye becomes the most improved Blazer. It has nothing to do with his personal improvement or skills. It’s just a numbers game. There aren’t enough minutes there, period. Any way you slice it he is a candidate to be the MLTGTS player. (That’s Most Likely To Get The Shaft…)

—Dave

by Dave on Jul 30, 2008 9:06 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm siding with you.

Frye won’t be getting anymore minutes than he did last year, possibly less.

@('.')@

by JTDuck22 on Jul 30, 2008 9:07 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'll disagree

I see Frye getting a lot more time, now that he can play his natural position. I think you’ll see Frye push LMA. Not end up starting, but just push him.

Kevin Pritchard is a 4.0 Draft Day Student

by rmcdougall on Jul 30, 2008 10:30 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Except ...

The Blazers add two rotation/starting quality big men, getting Oden back and the addition of Ike Diogu (who replaces McBob, who was never a threat to take minutes from Channing).

LMA is going to get his 35-36 mpg, Oden will probably average about 30 (depending on foul trouble) which leaves essentially table scraps for Przy, Frye and Diogu to fight over, and I think Nate is going to be more inclined to play Joel to spell Greg at center

I really like Channing, and I think he has the potential to be a solid backup, but simple math tells me that at best he can probably expect to play anywhere from 10-15 minutes per game next year and that is less not more than he had last year.

by nikolokolus on Jul 30, 2008 11:49 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree ......

Frye will not get the oppertunity to play …unless there was an inju…...that word which must not be said.

Blazers NBA champs 2010-2011!

by The Earl of Dunk on Jul 30, 2008 9:18 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think there is

enough time to go around as I see LMA only averaging 30-33 like Rasheed in Det. If you look at the big min breakdown is as follows:

Wallace 30.30=Oden
McDyess 29.18=LMA
Maxiell 21.36=Frye
Ratliff 13.9=Pryz

With Frye’s improvement I can see him being on the floor more with than Pryz due to his offensive capabilities. Against the opposing first unit, you have to worry more about having a D stopper but against the 2nd team offense you do not need to have. Add to that the most successful lineup last year per 82games.com was

Blake-Roy-Webster-Aldridge-Frye

with a +/- of +53 and I can see Frye getting the same if not more than last year and Joel dropping in minutes. Frye is still only 25 and has some room for development, while Pryz is 28. I am by no means slighting Joel as I love him, but I feel that Frye would be better deserving of more minutes and using Joel as an enforcer/mentor/fill-in for Oden would be a better use for him.

by SpyderRyder on Jul 31, 2008 12:25 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Maybe utblazer was talking about the other side of the coin?

Would Houston do it? They’re giving away a known commodity who is an EXCELLENT defender…all-NBA second team. However the guy doesn’t score much. But then again with Artest joining the fold they don’t need guys who score. And Battier is the ultimate team guy. But he does play Artest’s position. Then again he could swing in for Artest or McGrady should either prove unreliable for any reason. Then again (again) the Rockets were said to be semi-dissatisfied with Battier last year.

They’d be getting Frye, who would provide them a different look in the frontcourt. Webster’s shooting could match well with Yao Ming and Tracy McGrady. But does that equate to more wins now, which is what they need? The real payoff from Frye and Webster, if there is one, would come a few years down the road yet. Then again having a couple nice young guys never hurt anyone.

From both sides it seems like the same call: they could, but they don’t have to. I’m not sure how that translates in a trade other than both parties might want to wait and see. If there were any urgency it would be more on the part of the Blazers than the Rockets (if Battier were really the guy they wanted) so it would be up to Portland to sweeten the deal if it needed to be sweetened.

—Dave

by Dave on Jul 30, 2008 9:04 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If it made the deal

I would add in one of our second round picks next year.

by utblazer on Jul 30, 2008 9:20 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would add those second-rounders

for extra bacon on my sandwich.

Houston is an entire team of guys who are inconsistent. Adding Artest to that makes it MORE likely that they would want a ‘rock’ like Battier to build around.

Plus, Martell and Channing are too of my favorite Blazers, if not players.

Kevin Pritchard is a 4.0 Draft Day Student

by rmcdougall on Jul 30, 2008 10:32 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No way Houston does it

No way. It would take Outlaw and Frye

Shaniqua don't live here no more... Is Shaniqua there, HELL NO!

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jul 31, 2008 2:30 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree

It puts us in more of a win now mentality. However, the Blazers have enough flexibility at the SF right now that I think they can pull this off they could speed up the opening of the champioship window and not have that much of an affect on the closing of it. Battier should have a good 3 years left which is the length of his contract. I think after that time Outlaw will be hitting his prime and Batum should be ready to step in and play as Outlaws backup. That could be the plan anyway. I think Shane would be a good mentor for Outlaw and Batum. I think this deal makes a lot of sense and I would do it. It could put the Blazers into the the middle of the western conference playoff seeding, maybe a 4 or 5, rather than a 7 or 8 seed next year. Like I mentioned before, I also really like the benefit of not having to worry about Webster and Frye’s contract next summer. Like you say, maybe one of these plays ends up leaving anyway.

by utblazer on Jul 30, 2008 9:06 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yah

It makes a lot of sense in that way. Eventually it’s going to be a choice between Martell OR Travis at small forward. Both will envision themselves as big-minute players in this league. As they’re both young, that’s a problem down the road for us. Having Battier bow out as Travis ascends wouldn’t be the worst thing ever for us. Even if Batum doesn’t pan out other small forwards are draftable or mid-level-worthy.

—Dave

by Dave on Jul 30, 2008 9:08 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good post

That makes a lot of sense. The tough thing there though is knowing which player (Martell or Travis) will be better as a player and for this team.

@('.')@

by JTDuck22 on Jul 30, 2008 9:10 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Battier

is a good glue guy who could D up, grab some boards and score without once demanding the ball. Webster doesn’t do much for me and seems a little lost out on the court. Frye seems like a nice guy, but not someone that we absolutely need to keep.

I voted yes, but would feel better if Houston threw in a 2nd round pick.

by torsoheap on Jul 30, 2008 8:53 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

make that a

1st round pick. i think we are giving them a lot, and if i am houston i jump all over that. i would love to see prince, but i think he would be hard to get

life is like a bank, you can only take out as much as you put in. -Cal Ripken Sr.

by winnerwinner on Jul 30, 2008 8:59 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I Say..

WE throw in a second round pick. This Artest trade is all about the Rockets’ window (yep, other teams have windows, too) and Webster/Frye will only be helpful a couple years down the road when the team’s most likely to be in the place the Spurs are now. Not that it’s a bad thing, but there’s really no reason for the Rockets to roll the dice when they’re really looking at winning now (or next year, at the very least).

"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan

by 12sharks on Jul 30, 2008 11:14 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Really?

I think you overvalue our players.

Battier > Webster+Frye by a LONG shot

Shaniqua don't live here no more... Is Shaniqua there, HELL NO!

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jul 31, 2008 2:31 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would say yes.

But I think they would want Outlaw. And, to against popularity, I would do that too. I know, I’m a moron. But Shane does so many little things so well.

My favorite teams are the Blazers and any team that is playing the Lakers.

by OCBlazerFan1 on Jul 30, 2008 8:58 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

no your not

i would do that deal to if Houston threw in a second rounder or some other young prospect
(Aaron brooks)

by BLAZERS#52 on Jul 31, 2008 8:01 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Battier does not fit our window. He will be 30 before the season starts.

You have a rare Bruce Bowen type that can still be productive until 36-37, but with Bruce you have better 3 point shooting which stretches your opposing def. I like Battier for the next 3 years, but I question his effectiveness after that, and if I remember right he has had a marginal history with injuries, which will only get worse with age. If Pritchard pulled the trigger would be because he has confidence that Battier would be productive through his mid 30’s, but I seriously doubt it with his age. We have to wait to see how Martell fits in with our team through at least the half way point of the season before we trade him, unless it’s a no brainer. Don’t get me wrong we need a Battier/Bowen type. A lock down defender who doesn’t need touches, but at the same time on offense can keep defenses honest with his outside stroke.

by Titlein2011 on Jul 30, 2008 9:05 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Uh.....

Please chek your stats before you post.

Bruce Bowen career .391% > last year .419% & 3pts attempted 215
Shane Battier career .389% > last year .337% & 3pts attempted 369

Who was more effective?

Blazers NBA champs 2010-2011!

by The Earl of Dunk on Jul 30, 2008 9:27 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You've got the exact comparison

Shane Battier = Bruce Bowen (In 2001)

The Spurs acquired Bowen when he was 30 years old. Battier in the next 4-5 years can be every bit the player that Bruce Bowen has been for the Spurs the last 7 years. Bruce Bowen was an average shooter up til that point, and Battier has been even better earlier in his career than BB was.

Keep in mind that even with playing with these elite Spurs teams, Battiers career 3P% is virtually identical to that of Bowen. Typically players get better at that skill, especially provided it’d be their only contribution on the offensive end. After seeing Battier D up Brandon Roy this year, among other top tier NBA talent on the perimeter, I’m not exaggerating in calling him among the top 5 overall perimeter defenders in the whole league.

While I’m borderline about giving up TO and change for him, if we could find a way to get Battier for Martell and Frye, I think that’s a sacrifice you have to make. After all, we’d be getting more from Shane than we could possibly hope for in the next 3-4 years from Martell or Channing, and by that point, they may have decided to bolt anyway. I’m guessing it’d take slightly more than that to land Battier, if they even want to move him, but I think Battier is a picture perfect starting 3 for this team. His defensive contributions, especially limiting Roy’s workload on that end, will reap even more rewards on the offensive end. I hate Duke, but you have to love the qualities that Battier brings on the court (and off, he’s a good guy).

by as11osu on Jul 30, 2008 10:58 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I would prefer to wait till the trade deadline,

so that we can give martell and frye a chance to play with Oden and the other newcomers. If things just don’t work out, maybe this deal is still on the table. I just want to stay par for the course right now, and not really jump this way or that way yet.

Andy Roddick has the most wimbledon titles in the world. He just hides them in Federer's trophy case

by premthegrem on Jul 30, 2008 9:06 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That seems most likely to me

Unless the Blazers think they already know what they need to know about Martell and Channing, which is also possible.

—Dave

by Dave on Jul 30, 2008 9:09 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dave?

With this many replys Dave, shouldn’t you atleast add 1 REC?

Blazers NBA champs 2010-2011!

by The Earl of Dunk on Jul 30, 2008 9:28 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I like Channing

And so does KP but the lack of a SF who is not a total liability on D is not going to get it,not this year or next

by southern oregon on Jul 30, 2008 9:13 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Would make the Blazers significantly better this year

But not worth losing two guys who will likely both be more valuable than Battier by the time the Blazers are in potential dynasty mode (3 years).

I also doubt the Rockets would consider it. They’re in win now mode. Why would they trade away a solid, veteran three guy (even if they’re dissatisfied with him and he overlaps Artest) for two young, developing players? Does it make them better this year? Artest is a UFA and Martell is a RFA this summer, so instead of having Battier at bargain basement pricing, they potentially have nobody, or two guys demanding to be overpaid.

Also, the Rockets are apparently regarded as a numbers-oriented team. When they picked Batum, the draft analysts predicted trade immediately (b/c Batum’s numbers weren’t good). The bad news: Martell is not likely to be enticing for a numbers-oriented team. I think they would take Outlaw/Frye, probably, but Martell’s 12-something PER (with bad D) and subpar +/- is probably not getting it done. That’s why they’re unhappy with Battier, I think.

On the flipside, Frye’s numbers – especially +/- – are pretty good. That’s why I think they might consider Outlaw/Frye. But for the reasons Dave explained on the podcast, that’s not a good move for the Blazers. Leaves them with all launchers and no slashing from the three spot.

Bayless isn't the second coming of Jordan.
Jordan was the first coming of Bayless.

by KP Corleone on Jul 30, 2008 9:19 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm listening to the podcast right now

and haven’t gotten to that part, but wouldn’t Rudy be able to fill that role? Heck, even Roy can slide to SF if we need slashing ability from the wing at any point in the game.

I LOVE Battier to start, Webster to back him up, and Batum to learn from both of them. With Bayless, Sergio, and Rudy in the second unit Webster will have plenty of open shots to eat either starting or coming off the bench. That and our potent scoring ability off the bench will soften the blow of losing Outlaw. Trust me you’ll hardly miss the guy when we’re decorating the Rose Garden for Game 1 of a playoff series.

Also we’ll be setting ourselves up at SF for the next 12 years. Our coaching staff, in tandem with Battier’s experience and tutoring, will make it very likely that Webster and Batum both reach their ceiling in roles that fit our team’s makeup very nicely.

Pull the trigger. This deal won’t hurt our long-term prospects any more than holding an overabundance of young talent would, and it will make us a real contender right away, so why not?

Seriously, besides Tayshaun Prince, there is no vet in the league I would rather have at SF than Battier. Oden and Aldridge in the paint with Battier on the wing. Good luck scoring on the Blazers starting lineup next year.

BTW what’s with KP’s silence on Kopponen? It’s not a major deterrent to us winning a title, but not signing that kid will be one of his few regrets in my opinion. As far as pure PG’s go he has to be the most ideal talent we have, however raw.

"Life is a meaningless sequence of events in between Blazer championships"

by broggerboy19 on Jul 30, 2008 11:03 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Off topic, but...

Is Koponen’s rights going to be traded?

Some have said keep him in europe for 4 years and he’ll come back. Really? He might not want to at that point.

Maybe the “waiting on the Koponen decision” is KP looking for a draft pick or Koponen could be used as a sweetener in a Battier deal. (hoping)

by parkinglotj on Jul 31, 2008 12:02 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree

I would not include Outlaw in the deal either. I think you could argue that it will help Houston next year and down the road. For next year, Frye would be a good addition to their frontcourt. He provides a perimeter shooting big man that could compliment their other post players right now. As for Webster, sure he is not the player Battier is right now, but in Houston’s mind they make this deal hoping Frye helps them next year and then Webster would be a pretty good back up to Artest and McGrady and be their SF of the future.

by utblazer on Jul 30, 2008 9:26 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why would the Rockets Trade?

The Rockets have just given themselves a great opportunity the adding Ron A. Battier gives them depth and all the other attributes we are talking about. How would a project like Outlaw or Webster help them now? Frye makes sense for them, but would you trade Battier for a back up 4? They are going to want way to much for him. Something like, Webster AND Outlaw AND Frye, for Battier and a scrub to make it work salary wise.

by bad karma on Jul 30, 2008 9:44 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I believe you are correct

as far as the Rockets wanting more and not being in a hurry to trade Battier.

—Dave

by Dave on Jul 30, 2008 10:45 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Battier

does make an ideal role player off the bench for a champ contender like the Rockets. But with Battier’s marketability what it is I think they’d be game for entertaining some spicy offers.

If they set the bar at Outlaw and Webster though there’s no way we can do the deal. I totally agree with that notion. I also agree that Trout or Web probably wouldn’t be what Houston is looking for. They probably want a nice starting PG more than anything, and wouldn’t deal Battier for anything but.

"Life is a meaningless sequence of events in between Blazer championships"

by broggerboy19 on Jul 30, 2008 11:08 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Trade value

I think KP is waiting for Outlaw and Webster to increase their trade value.If he want to deal them, it’s too early now.For Houston fans, what they really hope is getting rid of Me-Mac, if Billups+Hamilton is available, the team is hard to defeat.

Bayless > Rose

by asiafan on Jul 30, 2008 11:35 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I know

this is beating a dead horse but Travis and Martell are weak on D and not going to get much better.I would do it

by southern oregon on Jul 30, 2008 11:56 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

minute problems

i think the prob with the minutes is not that there is enough minutes but that the stats are judged per game when they should be per minute. then we could more accurately judge players. i wish we had more defensive stats like most scored upon. most points given up by their man.

by riccc_l on Jul 31, 2008 12:11 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I made this point before

and Stash Morrison would lead Martell and Travis but not by much,the these guys have the potential to learn to play D mantra is geting a little old,how long have they been playing professionally now.

by southern oregon on Jul 31, 2008 12:42 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Premier defender?

2nd team all-league last year and nothing prior to that…. where’s the premier?

DC

by raisedbed on Jul 31, 2008 12:57 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A lot of people thought he should have been first team last year

Hollinger even had the numbers to back it up. And he was close to making the national team again just for his defensive abilities (they went with Prince).

Odenied: Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...

by Norsktroll on Jul 31, 2008 1:07 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

#25, #44, #8

“we already have the team I want to watch.” raoulduke

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Jul 31, 2008 5:41 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   1 recs

+1

It sums it up for me~

If Mike Rice calls Oden "Odom" this season I might have to seriously hurt him

by twiggs on Jul 31, 2008 1:07 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ugh! It's as if his scalp is so tight that his brain is outlined through his cranium

and it shows he’s lacking convolutions.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Jul 31, 2008 6:35 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He could be Oden's lil' buddy.

"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan

by 12sharks on Aug 6, 2008 3:20 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Houston won't commit long-term to Artest

Hell, the hijinx have already started:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3512419

They’ll still need Battier next season and the next

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on Jul 31, 2008 7:04 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh maaan...

He refers to himself in the third person. E-G-O!

I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure.

by JAB21 on Aug 1, 2008 12:34 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Folks here are overrating Battier a bit.

He’s probably one of the top two or three defensive wings in the league, but he’s becoming a liability on offense the last couple of seasons. He’s become pretty one dimensional (floating on the wings for spot up 3s) and he hits at a respectable percentage, but he’s becoming way too passive, to the point of passing up a lot of quality shots. Enough so that defenders know they don’t have to play him very tight.

So I like him and would definitely be interested in him as a 25 min/game bench guy, but not as my starter of the future. Especially at 29 years old, he is already showing signs of slippage the last couple of seasons.

by howlingfantods on Jul 31, 2008 7:47 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's what we do here

Every other player available in a trade is better than the guys on our roster, an every rookie in the draft or summer league, is better than the players on our roster. Our players are only better than other players when fans from other teams say they are not. Then we have to stick up for them.

by tominhawaii on Jul 31, 2008 8:19 AM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It certainly sees that way at times.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Jul 31, 2008 2:18 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

haha well spoken

Definition of a typical fan I’d say.

I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure.

by JAB21 on Aug 1, 2008 12:36 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree

I’d still do this trade for sure. Its irrelevant because Frye wouldn’t play in Houston (he’s not any better than Scola or Landry) and they are looking to make upgrades NOW.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Jul 31, 2008 2:41 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I voted yes, but I feel dirty desiring a Dookie

I think the trade makes sense for us, and would set us up nicely- addition by subtraction- as far as contracts and minutes go.
But I don’t think Frye will be hurting for minutes- he’ll be the choice off the bench for LMA a lot of the time, and Greg and Joel will be in foul trouble enough that he’ll log minutes at center every once in a while too.
I also really really want to see how Martell does with the bunches of wide-open looks from 3 he’ll have this year. The NBA has turned into a “pick the guy to beat you” league, and Martell is certainly that guy in our starting line-up. And his D can only be helped by having Greg and LMA erase his mistakes.
Either way, I’m happy.

"I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ." -Gandhi
"Throw Thag, throw. Throw throw throw throw throw throw"- Far Side

by TheThinWhiteDuke on Jul 31, 2008 9:40 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Rockets are going for it all....

Really I doubt they would trade with us for semi-projects (okay players, but still developing). Yao and McGrady are entering their 30s and the time for the team to win is now. Otherwise the team will be mediocre for years, and we all know how fun that is to be a low seed in the playoffs or lottery bound with a chance at the potential superstars. Teams try to avoid that. And as Ben said, the fewer questions about consistency and injuries (and who replaces the injured player’s role), the better a team will do. McGrady is injury prone, so Battier as a back-up (or Artest) would work well for them.

But if the Rockets started to free-fall from they’re gamble on Artest, I think they could look at moving Battier. And if we could trade Web/Trout and Frye for him, do it.
-Get a intelligent and consistent 3 to help us now. Remember the difference in having James Jones basketball savvy did for us last year? Battier > Jones. The fit is good, he is defense and team-oriented that plays within our system.
-His wealth of knowledge could help develop the other 3. Always a good thing to have a mentor for the two players on our team that came out of high school (one of which barely played basketball before the NBA).
-Fits our team’s character.
-Roster spot opens up.
-His contract expires at the perfect time to make a decision on what we need to compete for a championship.
-If it’s not working his track record will make him valuable for years in other trades. Could even package him with another project to consolidate talent if our timeline speeds up.

Oden and LaMarcus and Roy, oh my!

by Quik_Baller on Jul 31, 2008 11:15 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If you look at the Blazers roster

the thinnest position is at 4. Frye is a 4 with a good soft shot who can also legitmately backup the 5.

Frye isn’t going anwhere unless it’s a trade for a better 4.

by raoulduke on Jul 31, 2008 1:46 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

is "thin" the right word

because we have LMA, Fry, LaFrentz and Diogu? That’s a lot of muscle at the 4.

by oregonslee on Aug 1, 2008 2:43 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Here is reason why they need to keep Battier, right from Ron Ron's mouth

“Hopefully, he’s not fighting anymore and going after a guy in the stands,” Yao said, according to the Chronicle.

When asked about those comments, Artest said Yao had bought into “all the propaganda” about him.
“I understand what Yao said, but I’m still ghetto,” Artest said, according to the report. “That’s not going to change. I’m never going to change my culture. Yao has played with a lot of black players, but I don’t think he’s ever played with a black player that really represents his culture as much as I represent my culture. Once Yao Ming gets to know me, he’ll understand what I’m about. If you go back to the brawl, that’s a culture issue right there. Somebody was disrespecting me, so he’s got to understand where I’m coming from. People that know me know that Ron Artest never changed.”

The agreed-to deal sending Artest to Houston cannot become official until Aug. 14. And Artest, who has one year remaining on his contract, also said he was looking for a long-term deal from the Rockets, according to the report.

“We’ve still got to make sure there’s still a commitment [from the Rockets],” Artest said, according to the Bee. “That’s the main thing, is to make sure there’s still a commitment. When I speak to the powers-that-be of the Houston Rockets’ organization, we’re going to find out how much they really want me there. We’ll find out. I’m still waiting to find out if this is just a trade or if this is like a long-term commitment-type thing. I haven’t spoken to anybody yet. I’m still waiting.”

He also said he’s waiting for a phone call from Yao. “I guess once Yao Ming approves [the deal], I’ll be a Houston Rocket,” Artest said, according to the report. “[Yao] probably should’ve called me first. But at the same time, it’s Yao Ming’s team.

“Whatever Yao Ming wants me to do, I’ll be there. Whatever Tracy McGrady tells me to do, that’s how it’s going to go down. Ultimately, whatever [Rockets] coach Rick Adelman tells me to do is exactly what I’m going to do.”

Odenied: Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...

by Norsktroll on Jul 31, 2008 1:32 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yao was just being honest

but I think Artest has a reason to feel slighted. The only answer Yao should have given was, “Ron’s an outstanding player. We’re lucky to get him. I’m looking forward to playing with him.”

With this one comment, the Rockets have already used up their grace period with Artest. How do you think he will react if there’s another slip of the tongue from Yao or anyone else in the organization? He hasn’t even joined the team and it’s already walking-on-eggshells time.

Asked his specialty in the kitchen, Oden paused and said, "Hamburger Helper and tuna fish."

by MiledAnimal on Aug 1, 2008 4:19 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How would he react?

Hasn’t he shown how he reacts to disrespect?

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on Aug 4, 2008 11:26 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the tone of your question

assumes this is artests team. its not, its yoa, and mcgradys’. artest needs to fit in with them, NOT the other way arround, and he has allready failed. my prediction, rockets implode.

"If I was in anyway unclear, I am implying that Dave is a serial murderer."
---jonestr on Aug 3, 2008 12:25 AM PDT

by ptwnblzr on Aug 4, 2008 11:49 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Artest quote

“I understand what Yao said, but I’m still ghetto,” Artest said, according to the report. “That’s not going to change. I’m never going to change my culture. Yao has played with a lot of black players, but I don’t think he’s ever played with a black player that really represents his culture as much as I represent my culture. Once Yao Ming gets to know me, he’ll understand what I’m about.”

now replace yao with roy, and you immediatly side with yao. or at least i do. artest is not the leader of this team, but he just might lead them anyways. just none of the fans will want to follow, ie bad place.

"If I was in anyway unclear, I am implying that Dave is a serial murderer."
---jonestr on Aug 3, 2008 12:25 AM PDT

by ptwnblzr on Aug 4, 2008 11:54 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Clip and save for future reference:

When asked about those comments, Artest said Yao had bought into "all the propaganda" about him.
"I understand what Yao said, but I’m still ghetto," Artest said, according to the report. "That’s not going to change. I’m never going to change my culture. Yao has played with a lot of black players, but I don’t think he’s ever played with a black player that really represents his culture as much as I represent my culture. Once Yao Ming gets to know me, he’ll understand what I’m about. If you go back to the brawl, that’s a culture issue right there. Somebody was disrespecting me, so he’s got to understand where I’m coming from. People that know me know that Ron Artest never changed."

"He shoots....................... he scores!!!"

by timbo on Aug 2, 2008 8:58 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think the real question is

whether Webster and Frye have a future beyond this season. Both are free-agents next summer so this is the last chance to trade them if they don’t have a future in Portland.
Ideally we should wait till December/January to make this trade. That way it’ll give Webman 2-3 months to show us(and Nate and of course, KP) just how much he has improved. Martell knows just how important a summer it is cause it is his contract year. If he doesn’t improve his defense, team and one-on-one, his shooting, his ball-handling, and his overall consistency, then I say trade him and Frye for Battier.
We just gotta be patient and see how Webster does between October and January.

by VinnyB on Aug 3, 2008 3:59 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

>> Would Houston deal Battier now?

No.

"He shoots....................... he scores!!!"

by timbo on Aug 3, 2008 8:29 AM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

whears Mortimer

and how do you spell ware? were? whear, wair, where. I hate that stupid word. my wittle bwain hutz

"If I was in anyway unclear(,) I am implying that Dave is a serial murder(er)."
---jonestr on Aug 3, 2008 12:25 AM PDT

by ptwnblzr on Aug 3, 2008 1:30 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

thats funny you mention that, I hate Holly as well

"If I was in anyway unclear(,) I am implying that Dave is a serial murder(er)."
---jonestr on Aug 3, 2008 12:25 AM PDT

by ptwnblzr on Aug 3, 2008 2:39 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You can and should hate whatever until today 24:00.

Tomorrow you will love everybody and the whole world again.

The Midnight Rambler

by amlmart1 on Aug 3, 2008 3:09 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

aaww

do i have to?

"If I was in anyway unclear(,) I am implying that Dave is a serial murder(er)."
---jonestr on Aug 3, 2008 12:25 AM PDT

by ptwnblzr on Aug 3, 2008 3:17 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Holly is pokey (ouch)

Unless yer talking about the stripper named Holly….she is hot!

Homer: "Oh no!! A Bear is eating my father!." (On seeing Selma kissing Grampa)

by 92wastheyear on Aug 3, 2008 3:59 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

she took me to the champain room

and well, you know....

"If I was in anyway unclear(,) I am implying that Dave is a serial murder(er)."
---jonestr on Aug 3, 2008 12:25 AM PDT

by ptwnblzr on Aug 3, 2008 4:49 PM PDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yao says he is at 60 to 70 percent health right now

The pressure to play for his country in the Olympics is enormously high, yet he clearly isn’t healthy yet. Let me go out on a limp (no pun indented) and say that after the Olympics Yao won’t be healthier than he is now. And that’s if he is lucky and Howard, Boozer or some other heavy dude doesn’t land on his foot again.

I’m so happy the Blazers try everything to bring Oden slowly back into the full contact training process.

http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/53860/20080803/yao_im_only_60_to_70_percent/

Odenied: Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...

by Norsktroll on Aug 3, 2008 7:34 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No.

Houston would not make this deal… not because of concerns over Artest, but because they could get more in exchange. I think they would do it for Outlaw (who can play some PF) and Frye, but I don’t see KP doing that deal.

Portland would/should make this deal in a heartbeat if possible for the following reasons:

1. Battier’s game – with his defense, shooting, and the fact that he doesn’t need the ball in his hands to be effective, this team would become A LOT BETTER over the next three years. Yes Frye and Webster are nice players with potential but let’s face it, they are redundant and unnecessary pieces of the puzzle, plus they can mess things up…

2. Next summer – Battier’s contract makes things that much easier for us next summer during our Cap Space Window Of Opportunity (CSWOO). Frye and Webster will make things worse unless A.) we renounce them (in which case they are worthless), or B.) they sign for a combined salary less than Battier’s (unlikely given their career arcs). And even if they did re-sign, what does that mean for…

3. Our prospects beyond 2011 – Yeah Battier will be 33 and a free agent in 2011, but so what? At that point in time you would have (further moves aside):

Oden – 23 years old
Batum – 23
Bayless – 23
LMA – 26
Rudy – 26
Roy – 27
Trout – 27
Pryz – 32

Given those eight guys and whomever else is on the roster at that point (Koponen, Diogu, etc. etc.), I can’t see Webster or Frye making a huge impact over those guys anyway (well maybe Batum if he hasn’t developed).

So yes, if I’m KP, I’m making that deal in a second. If I’m Houston, I’m saying thanks, that’s a lot of talent, but I want a better PF if I’m going to give up Battier.

MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)

by The Cactus Leaguer on Aug 3, 2008 10:47 PM PDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Atari2600_small
Buyer Beware: Lessons from the FA Class of '08
180px-blazers_original_small
Check the action, KP. The cards will come.
100_4977_small
JD 7/5
Small
Commitment
Small
Nicolas Batum interview in REVERSE (french mag) of July

Recent FanPosts

Small
Andre Miller, Ramon Sessions, or Steve Blake
Small
Chris Paul to the Blazers! It could happen...
200px-portlandmemorialcol_small
The Acquire Lamar Odom Discussion
Small
Question. Is It Possible to Use Our Cap Space to...
Go_blazers__small
Marion? Lee? PG situation?
Small
Grant Hill to Portland?
Small
My take on what the blazers need
Small
Leon Powe
Small
Why Hedo?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Greedo Turkoglu



"E lo tolo Pritchard????"
See Ya Later Hedo! It was fun while it lasted :)
fooled us!
Hedo Rejects Deal, Ends Talks
Hedo in red and black. Bustabucket whipped out the Photoshop

Recent FanShots

Top 12 Young Teams (written a year ago)
Brother Wendell weighs in on DLee, Ric Bucher tweets on Odom
The Curious Case of Kobe Bryant, Part I
Kidd Going Back To Mavs
Sheed to the Celts
Orlando's take on the Hedo to Toronto signing
Brandon Bass: 25 million dollar man
Thought this was hecka funny TORONTO / PORTLAND - Turkish star Hidayet...
Odem and Lee Not Right For the Blazers
Victor Claver Video Interview

Post_icon New FanShot All FanShots Carrot-mini


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

151054601_tp_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports