Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

Potential - for and against...

  So, there I am, minding my own business and reading (re-reading, actually) Dan Simmons novel, "A Winter Haunting" (if you haven't read Dan Simmons, you need to.  Great writer and has written something in almost every genre) when Mr. Simmons references that great philosopher, Linus van Pelt, who made this observation:

1120-linus_medium

via eclecticemily.files.wordpress.com

 

  He (Dan Simmons, not Linus) then went on to state, "Potential... was a burden before it was realized, and a constant specter after it had been failed to be realized.  And every day, every hour, every small decision made, eliminated the remaining set of potential until... that potential was fast dwindling toward zero."

  The word potential is used fast and free around the NBA world (and probably most sports worlds) and has been appended in Blazerland in the last few years to such disparate players as Ha Seung-Jin, Sebastian Telfair, Joel Freeland, Martell Webster, Travis Outlaw and Sergio Rodriguez.  It also has been applied to LaMarcus Aldridge and Brandon Roy.

  The first definition in my dictionary of the word potential is "possible, as opposed to actual."  In my own world, electricity, potential realized is not usually a good thing; in the NBA world it can be a very good thing.  (Unless the sentence is something like, "Rasheed Wallace has more potential to blow up on court than any other player...")

  I'm not certain where I am headed with all of this.  I just know that I am truly tired of the word potential.  We've been hearing for years about how much potential certain players have.  Here's a fact, you can't eat potential.  I don't know what that means, but it is undeniable.  I want to see certain players fish or cut bait.  I want these players to do their business or get off the pot.  I want to see how many metaphors I can mix in one paragraph.

  Dan Simmons went on later in the book to liken potential to an inverted cone.  The more time that passes, the smaller the cone of potential becomes.  I don't know how true that really is but it rings true for me.  Here's what I know for sure: In the last couple of years, the Blazers have spent their lottery picks on players with more (apparent) reality than (presumed) potential.  I like that trend.  Maybe I can pare this down to one declarative sentence...

  A lottery pick, especially a high lottery pick -say 1 through 7 - should not be spent on a player with more "potential" than proof.

  OK, that sentence had potential but I think it fell short, maybe someone can do better?

 

 


 

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

ok everyone

lets stop saying “potential”...let’s go with “upside” instead. lol

Just kidding…...I am in the same boat. I think the time has come to stop talking potential and start talking actual.

Homer: "Oh no!! A Bear is eating my father!." (On seeing Selma kissing Grampa)

by 92wastheyear on Jul 27, 2008 7:39 AM PDT reply actions  

1990 Finals

The inverted cone could certainly be applied to the Drexler lead Blazer teams of the 90s. The late 80s had many talking potential and the trade for Buck Williams meant they were serious about winning right away. But, did making the Finals in his first year raise expectations too high and put too much pressure on that team to win in the next two years? Would their window have been open a bit longer if that first year had ended with Phoenix going to the Finals and the Blazers keeping a bit of the underdog label?

The same could be said for the 1985 Rockets team that made the Finals. Expectations were sky high for a team that was not ready for that kind of pressure. It took them almost 10 years to get back to that level with an entirely different roster except Hakeem.

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on Jul 27, 2008 8:03 AM PDT reply actions  

I think that's what is happening

nowadays – at least with the Blazers. The high picks are known quantities, the 2nd rounders are wild guesses. That is, as much as a player can be a known quantity. Usually the drafts consist of two can’t miss guys and then rest of them. They all have potential, but what will it take to help them realize it? Some, simply by their work habits, will never even come close. Others work hard, but for other reasons don’t achieve what anyone expected.

I think that expectations is another word that needs to be thrown in. That comes from the outside – applied by fans and to a lesser extent by management. A player may have his own expectations, but they aren’t often tied to realistic potential (look at all the players who remained undrafted.)

But “proof” is also way too nebulous. All that has been proven is that a player has excelled with this coach and these teammates against this opposition. That does not guarantee success. It only indicates potential success. So there we are back to the beginning.

Its probably nit-picking, but I think Linus really meant the burden is high expectations. Or maybe “potential” was shorthand for “high expectations of reaching my potential.”

I dunno, I’m wandering around here. I think the inverted cone is a given – if potential is finite. And because there’s still so much to be learned about the body, we have to assume potential is finite. (And if it is possible to talk about “realizing” a potential then it is finite. Surely in electricity it is finite.) (Have I achieved a record by using “finite” this many times in one small paragraph?)

And maybe “potential” as a noun is just one of those buzz words that will go away (in other than scientific use.). As 92was pointed out “upside” is used to mean the very same thing.

So what was your point, Ken? Furthermore, what was mine????

You wanna delete this thread and start again? [insert very large grin here]

"We, as Blazer fans, are perhaps the luckiest fans in the league."-Idog1976, July 19.

by jorga on Jul 27, 2008 9:14 AM PDT reply actions  

I especially like...

your third paragraph. I know there are always exceptions, but I think that most every player who has more than 3 years of experience and suddenly explodes, let’s look at Steve Nash, does so because the circumstances have changed in his favor and not because he’s suddenly become a different player.

My point? I think it’s time to realize that certain players are not going to live up to the potential/expectations that we might once have had for them. Furthermore, throwing out phrases such as, ”...would only be a senior in college right now…” are not helpful.

Really, most of my ramblings are hindsight. I am grateful that we now have management who seem to be looking at reality rather than potential, especially as it relates to higher draft picks.

"I love this game!" -Moonbeam, from 'Rollerball' right before he was knocked into a permanent coma

by -ken on Jul 27, 2008 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

That post has potential for good discussions

I especially like the concept that (unrealized) potential leads to less remaining potential over time. The inverted cone analogy is fitting. Mhm, ice cones… I’m drifting off.

For players coming into the NBA, the younger they are the less they have already proven themselves and the harder it becomes to extrapolate from their high school careers (often against inferior competition) and a few important college games how good they ultimately might become. So scouts, agents and managers like to use the “potential” or “upside” moniker to say that a player is good yet still has a lot of room for improvement. Potential broken down they e.g. have “an NBA body/frame”, “solid shot mechanics”, “a great motor” or “good work ethics” which are all indicators of future success. But none guarantees success. So either you take the player who is already a little older and thus has less “potential” to become way better than he is before reaching his prime in a few years, or you take a younger unproven one who shows traits of a greater development. And since the ultimate goal of drafting is finding the “gems” or “steals” before others do, teams will often go for a younger player with more “potential”. That’s just the nature of the game, trying to find great talents early in their career.

Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...

by Norsktroll on Jul 27, 2008 2:30 PM PDT reply actions  

+1

for proper use of the word “disparate”

and +1 for one of the more cogent posts to appear here.

ALL those in the NBA and on the fringes have “potential”. BRoy was quite accomplished in college, but still had potential to become a better player … and still does. At the level at which these guys play, “potential” comes down to wanting it more than the next guy and being willing to work as hard as is necessary to win.

In general, the art of government consists in taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other.

by TTRocks on Jul 27, 2008 2:30 PM PDT reply actions  

In my own world, electricity..

This makes you sound amazing. Like you’re not of this material plane or whatever.

"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan

by 12sharks on Jul 27, 2008 2:57 PM PDT reply actions  

I am amazing...

but what I meant was that my job in the real world deals with electricity.

"I love this game!" -Moonbeam, from 'Rollerball' right before he was knocked into a permanent coma

by -ken on Jul 27, 2008 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

but the hours suck.

"I love this game!" -Moonbeam, from 'Rollerball' right before he was knocked into a permanent coma

by -ken on Jul 28, 2008 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

So does this:

Asked his specialty in the kitchen, Oden paused and said, "Hamburger Helper and tuna fish."

by MiledAnimal on Jul 29, 2008 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry Ken

Just like in your previous fanpost saying THE TIME IS NOW, NO MORE POTENTIAL, you’re going to have to live with dealing with constant talk of potential and upside. Remember, this is the youngest team in the league.

Remember, Roy, our best player, is entering his 3rd year.
Remember, so is LMA.
Remember, Oden is hopefully our best player and is a ROOKIE.
Remember, so are Rudy and Bayless, who figure to be featured prominently.
Remember, Martell and Trout are both figuring out who they are.
Remember, this team overall is in their early 20’s.

How can you NOT focus on the potential and upside of the team when everyone is so young? I ain’t an excuse, it’s a cold hard fact. Like I said in your previous fanpost similar to this topic, now is not the time to say WIN NOW OR ELSE or ENOUGH POTENTIAL, MAKE WITH THE REAL. Maybe next year, or after we make the playoffs.

Yeah, we’ve been out of the playoffs for 5 years or so, but this CURRENT team has only been out of the playoffs for one season. It hasn’t been a long time coming for the Pritchard regime.

I want to win now and win a lot and I can’t imagine us not making the playoffs. Even still, I know this team is incredibly young, and teams much older than us won’t have near the expectations we have. We have to let everyone play for at least ONE year before we get impatient.

Not saying you’re impatient per se, but this is at least your 2nd fanpost bemoaning the general topic of potential, and wishing to have actual talent here and now. That is simply impossible to give you until we see how Oden is, and the rest of the kids.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jul 29, 2008 2:24 AM PDT reply actions  

In all seriousness...

this post is really just my musings about the word potential. I read the Dan Simmons quote (you really do need to read him, he’s that good) and it got me going a bit. Just thinking out loud and using the Blazers as examples since we all know them best.

I do think our previous regime was too caught up in potential, though, and made some really poor draft picks because of it. The present group seems to look at everything and has done, I think, a much better job.

That said, these kids can grow up now, darnit!

"I love this game!" -Moonbeam, from 'Rollerball' right before he was knocked into a permanent coma

by -ken on Jul 29, 2008 7:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.
Blazers_small
What are we missing?
Red_blazer_logo_small
The Felton Trade, Linsanity, and the PG Position 1 year from now
Small
Effort?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011
Rhino
I'm sure you've all heard the news by now that I'm having a scope on my...

Recent FanShots

LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10
Celtics interested in Rondo - Gasol swap? ...
Batum - Top 10 NBA Sixth Men

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm