9 Ways to Improve the NBA Draft
I have been thinking about it for a while and here are 9 ideas that will improve the quality of the draft and its coverage. All of these ideas can be initiated by the NBA and really add value to its product.
1) Add more pre-draft coverage. The NBA needs to capitalize on the fact that only 60 players are drafted each year and even less actually make it into the league. Why not profile them in a “60 prospects in 30 days” fashion? The average fans would be able to see more than just 15 seconds of highlights on a given prospect and the interviews could be a bit more in-depth.
2) Move the draft from the weekday to the weekend. Right now, the draft forces NBA fans (who hold down an 8-5 job) on the West Coast to either join late or skip a bit of work. The same can be said for fans on the East Coast who have to stay up until the wee hours of a weekday night to watch the end of the draft.
3) For the sake of David Stern, his cohort Adam Silver and the viewers, spell the prospects names phonetically on the draft cards. Darrell Arthur’s name should appear as “Dah-rel Ar-thur”. Its simple and would eliminate a lot of confusion.
4) Speaking of the fans, revamp the draft coverage. This starts with eliminating the in-draft interviews of the prospects. No one learns anything from the interviews and they detract from the actual coverage of the draft. Form a team consisting of Jay Bilas, Chad Ford and Snapper Jones. Let them lead the draft coverage. Add more speculation. I found out about all of the trades via the internet, and not during the broadcast. Add more highlights of the draftees. Fire anyone who is not prepared to talk about a player who was chosen 12th overall.
5) If a prospect falls past the 19th pick, they should be taken backstage, away from the media. It is agonizing to watch a guy slip and it actually detracts from the players that are being selected before him. Take him backstage, to an out of sight out of mind place.
6) Allow teams to trade draft picks for cash. Currently, the NBA allows teams to trade draft rights for cash, but not draft picks for cash. The difference is miniscule and it leads to more confusion on the part of the prospects, the fans and even the broadcasters. Also, changing this rule would allow for teams to take immediate possession of the draft pick, instead of being forced to call another team to make the pick on behalf of them.
7) Allow teams to trade picks in consecutive years - I call this the Phoenix Suns rule. As it is, teams must wait to draft a player and then make a trade. It unnecessarily slows down the trade process and does not add any value to anything. Finally, the rule does not accomplish anything as seen by the fact that the Suns did not make a first round selection for several years in a row.
8) Speed up the trade approval process. If necessary, have the arm of the NBA that approves trades work around the clock on this one to make sure that trades can be completed and announced in a timely fashion. As it stands, trades simply take far too long to be completed.
9) Create a period of time between the day before the draft and the beginning of the next fiscal year called “Period 13.” This is the last, and most important change because Period 13 would allow teams to make trades using either salary values from the current NBA season or the next NBA season. Essentially, trades that will not work for salary purposes in 07-08 but will work for 08-09 would be immediately approved. It should be noted that only one time period (07-08 OR 08-09) could be applied to the trade.
I wish I could have shortened this post, but I think all of the ideas would make the draft a much more enjoyable event.
9 recs |
43 comments
Comments
Great post!
I really like the your ninth argument! Have any particular team in mind with that??? ;-)
by lefty6283 on Jun 30, 2008 8:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
This site is blocked when I am at work. I actually thought of number nine when I was Luol Deng don a Phoenix Sun hat.
by da34shadow on Jun 30, 2008 8:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree on most of these (good post! Easy rec), but
I actually kind of like the interviews with the draftees. They should be short and concise, but they’re still valuable.
Otherwise excellent stuff. I’d have to think about number 9 before stamping approval on it, but it sounds very interesting. Would revamp the way people think about trades.
"Beards--they grow on you"
by prezofdeath on Jun 30, 2008 8:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
what about fire stephen A
and then we can still have the interviews, with someone who can speak english
by blackandwite323 on Jun 30, 2008 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I rec’ed this because Stephen A is brutal to watch… but I actually like how he speaks with passion, I just think his spontaneous off the cuff opinions are awful.
MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)
by The Cactus Leaguer on Jun 30, 2008 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
YES!
Stephen A is absolutely horrible, but the interviews should stay.
"I think it’s going to be very beautiful game next year."
-Batuuuuuuuum!
by rockingharder on Jun 30, 2008 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ughh
how many different ways can SAS ask “what are you going to bring to your team?”
Woof
by Charles Barkley McLovin on Jun 30, 2008 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
good stuff, gave you the clinching rec
I think #1 is a bit too much. Probably more like 20-30 guys would be enough. No one is going to watch the draft profile of Alexandratianitis Kirilchopohavlovonov from Outer East Upper Uzbekestan who’s 18 (we think), 7’2”, has been playing basketball for just 6 months, but has “great footwork” just because he’s a candidate to get drafted #57 and stay in Europe for 5 years to develop.
I like the weekend idea too. There’s pretty much nothing going on in the sports world the last weekend in June anyway, so why not.
By far though the most important thing is numbers 8/9. The whole process of making guys pretend they are going to team A when everyone in the universe knows they aren’t is just stupid. “here, where this hat of the team that didn’t want you, and talk about how much you are going to love playing there”. “Oh, and by the way, the team itself won’t be able to introduce you or even talk about you for 2 weeks until we finally getting around to officially approving the trade, even though we know right now what the numbers are going to be in 14 days and we could go through the exercise”
by douglast on Jun 30, 2008 9:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I would watch all of them
It’d be good if they went in depth on these guys, and not the NBA Cares type of superficial boring kool-aid induced WE LOVE EVERYTHING type of hiipie coverage. Real in depth, like CNN ten years ago. That’d be VERY INTERESTING.
I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich
by hobobob on Jun 30, 2008 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd submit that you are the exception and not the rule
but I could be wrong.
by douglast on Jun 30, 2008 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta disagree...
The NBA is in a unique position to be able to profile each prospect in a better manner than ever before. Ideally the show would be like a made for TV DraftExpress. No stuff about starving families, just basketball highlights and maybe an interview.
by da34shadow on Jun 30, 2008 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your Phoenix suns rule
is actually the Atlanta Hawks rule from the 80s
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jun 30, 2008 10:09 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought it the Ted Stepien Rule
named because the the owner of the Cavs traded away so many picks that when the Gunds bought the team, the league gave them supplemental picks to make up for the terrible moves that Stepien had made. More about this here:
http://www.forumblueandgold.com/2007/09/11/ted-stepien-and-the-james-worthy-rule/
by tingeyga on Jul 1, 2008 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good post, I agree with all your suggestions
Except 1, 4, and 5. Especially 5. Watching draft picks plummet is a right of spring and in some cultures signals the start of summer. I’ll probably be the only one to speak up for allowing the falling prospects to squirm, but apparently I am heartless.
But seriously, more pre-draft coverage? This would unfold as a bunch of panning shots of some basketball court in some city where some prospect lost his brother/mother/best friend when he was very young while in the background a melodramatic string quartet plays a gruelingly long A minor to C progression and his high school coach says, “from the day I met him, I knew he had the guts to make it.” No thank you.
BLZRS FRVR
by nightbluefruit on Jun 30, 2008 11:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I do not agree with rule 5 either
But I have no desire to watch anyone squirm. I think anyone who is eligable to be drafted should be allowed to be there. If we all know everyone isn’t going to be drafted than we don’t have to worry…. or they could just not show the sad guy sitting there as his stock plummets.
I would also like to add that I don’t like the announcers being miked for the audience. You can have another group do that and a tv announcer crew for tv. It makes it awkward and weird.
The did not do a good job this year. And why do it in NY when they always boo?
by Blazersaurus on Jun 30, 2008 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really? No one likes watching falling draft picks?
I mean, if they were upset about something serious, like, say, a terminal disease or something, I wouldn’t be amused. But these are guys on the verge of tears because their salaries are going to be 3 mil instead of 10. That’s not funny? Alright, I’m a heartless apathetic robot.
I do NOT think the draft should ever be moved from NY. The commish deserves his annual booing. Seriously. Just ask the Supersonics Robber Barons.
BLZRS FRVR
by nightbluefruit on Jun 30, 2008 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was in Portland once
When I was a kid. I like it in NY, because of the rowdy crowds.
Yeah, watching Rashard Lewis or Darrel Arthur fall in the draft isn’t nice, but it’s compelling entertainment. I don’t mind it.
Brook Lopez crying because he wasn’t picked (or was it because he WAS picked?) was hilarious to me. As was Bayless looking so pissed that he had to live in Indiana. I got bummed with how excited Rush seemed to be a Blazer though…
I love the draft, and the only thing I’d really wanna change is the ‘no discussing trades’ crap that makes a mockery of everything. I like suggestion #9 above for that reason. It’s just dumb!
I’m fine not TECHNICALLY approving the deal until later, but allow people to discuss it a little bit and not act out this charade that ‘its all speculation’ and nothing has happened. It is idiotic and not fun to listen to or watch.
The draft is awesome, and will be even when we are awesomer.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jun 30, 2008 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
June 1992
The draft was going on basically at the same time that the basketball Tournament of Americas was happening at the Coliseum – this was the Olympic qualifiers and was the first time anywhere that the Dream Team (the only one worthy of the name) was playing. The NBA decided to get in on the action and publicity and set up shop here for the draft.
by douglast on Jun 30, 2008 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Someone just changed my mind about #5.
After pick #19, the plummeting pick could be escorted backstage by officials as the camera followed him in his “walk of shame.” Then Jim Nantz (who would be contracted out for this expressed purpose only) would mutter under his breath, “A sad way…to begin a career…...you have to wonder…if it was just the kidneys….(silence).........”
BLZRS FRVR
by nightbluefruit on Jun 30, 2008 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I was thinking more Ryan Seacrest
“Will he be picked?...........We’ll find out after the break!”
There ya go Tommy, I hope you like that
"Some of Dave’s greatest gifts are unanswered posts."
by 92wastheyear on Jun 30, 2008 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
It probably couldn’t be much worse than it is now if he took over. I’d love to see those silly 30 second videos of each pick; like the do on American Idol before each song.
<-;-)
by tominhawaii on Jun 30, 2008 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How about a celebrity announcer?
Maybe a comedian. Although I would miss seeing Stern get booed by the NY audience every year, watching him and then Adam Silver for round 2 for hours on end is pretty brutal. A few well placed jokes could spice things up… and Stephen A’s schtick doesn’t qualify.
Or perhaps a bikini clad ring girl walking behind the commish with a sign indicating the current pick. (I apologize to the female BE readers for that suggestion.)
by shralpster on Jun 30, 2008 11:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
How about a speedo clad ring boy? ;0
"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar
by annthefan on Jul 1, 2008 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought the draft coverage regressed from bad to horrible this year. I don’t know if all of your suggestions make sense, but most of them do, and the underlying thing is simply that the draft (and draft coverage) needs a serious, serious overhaul.
I also find it amusing that the first thing they do when a player is drafted is hand them a baseball cap.
MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)
by The Cactus Leaguer on Jun 30, 2008 11:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
What are they going to do?
Instead of a baseball cap, would they sent them to a tattoo parlor?
by da34shadow on Jun 30, 2008 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Robin Lopez
That XS baseball cap on his XXL hair was pure comedic gold and my personal draft highlight image. I would have paid extra to see him change caps a few times, despite hating this procedure in general.
But yeah, a team jersey might be nicer, though not like the NFL did it this year with giving everybody a jersey with the number 1. That was highly confusing.
Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...
by Norsktroll on Jun 30, 2008 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jersey?
Isn’t it better to dress them in clothing that befits their selection, regardless the manner in which they’re garbed? I can only think of Duh-rell swapping Hornets-Blazers-Rockets-Grizzlies jerseys over his blazer after all the trades. Seems like, to me, an insult to injury.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
by 12sharks on Jun 30, 2008 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess...
I didn’t offer an alternative: how about an NBA jersey with their number being the slot in which they were drafted? Seems like it would clear up a lot of draft-day muck-a-luck that way.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
by 12sharks on Jun 30, 2008 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In going along with "more speculation"
I would love to see “War Room” correspondents… just so that they could report which teams are burning up the phone lines and who are twiddling their thumbs. Imagine the potential for in draft smoke screens. GM’s pretending to be desperate to move up for a pick with only a 5 minute window for other teams to believe them or not. It would be entertaining.
Secondly… I want the “Commissioner Cam.” No one knows where he goes. If the cam were in place, it would finally be revealed that he gets the teams pick/trade in about 10 seconds and then just watches the commercials on ESPN… enjoying the ad revenue for the next 4:35 or so.
by Salem Stephen on Jun 30, 2008 12:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Man this is a fun thread
Great suggestions everyone. :)
BTW idea #9 is a great one, I hadn’t thought of that. Very original.
I think #5 would look like a perp walk, and would be worse than just sitting and waiting for your name. IMO.
by Timmay! on Jun 30, 2008 12:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the draft on Thursday
It leaves a weekday for all the talking heads and media to discuss the draft while it is still fresh. Also, I would not want to waste a Sunday on it.
<-;-)
by tominhawaii on Jun 30, 2008 4:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Weekend
Moving the draft to a Sunday afternoon would definitely be a great idea, so I and others don’t have to use vacation pay to leave work early to watch everything. And SAS needs to go, he just makes me cringe.
There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man — with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)
My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.
by johnv59 on Jun 30, 2008 5:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
you cant speed it up
the legal paperwork can’t be done any faster. it takes time. time, and attention to detail, two mortal enemies.
M, period. Fresh, comma.
by manzell on Jun 30, 2008 7:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
100% disagree
Yes, there are details, but name me one trade in the last 10 years that was rejected due to an “i” not being dotted or a “t” crossed? Point is, the trade would be announced knowing that there is a contingency that all players involved pass a physical, yada, yada.
by da34shadow on Jun 30, 2008 8:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just run it through the ESPN Trade Machine and we’re good to go.
To quote Michael Scott (in the episode where he used his GPS to drive into a lake) – “The Machine Knows!!!”
MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)
by The Cactus Leaguer on Jun 30, 2008 11:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
forget the paperwork
we arent’ talking about contracts and such. We are talking, does this trade pass the NBA collective bargaining agreement? We are in 2008. We have the technology. The NBA has the money to hire the manpower (and more importantly computer power) that can drive that to pretty instantaneous decision. I guarantee you I could desing and write an application to do it, given time and all the information. That’s what i do. Yeah, so there could be a paperwork delay later or a failed physical or something. That’s like less than 1% chance of happening, and everyone knows that going in. Even so, it doesn’t actually hurt anyway to “officially” announce the trade that night even if it does get overturned later. it’s no different than now, except the league and teams have to pretend they are the only people in the known universe who don’t know about all these trades.
by douglast on Jun 30, 2008 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with You..
but I’m not with you.
@da34shadow – evidence of lack isn’t evidence of existence, right?
@douglast – I’m guessing you’re a computer/Web programmer, as am I. I could write a program to deal with the qualities you’ve laid out, as well. It’s pretty simple – we could probably get together and write something better than King ESPN’s trade machine (no RLEC trades?!). However, we are all dead aware of the NBA, its officials and its image problem. This whole conundrum stinks of bureaucracy more than technology to me; the problem, I say, has less to do with information channels than it does with the NBA not wanting egg on its face for announcing a trade that doesn’t go through. Failed physicals, as you mentioned, are EXACTLY why these trades aren’t announced. It makes things less fun (and much less informative) for fans, but in so doing makes the NBA look like a much more intelligent, cohesive unit, in this humble BEdger’s opinion. Consider Larry Bird’s deadpan reaction to questions regarding the JB and O’Neal trades. Now multiply that by a billion to account for Stern’s ego and you may see from where I’m coming on this thing.
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
by 12sharks on Jun 30, 2008 10:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I hear you
I understand completely WHY they do it. I just think they (Stern) is making a very poor choice. He’s alienating and taking his fanbase for granted all for the sake of his massive ego. Heaven forbid one of the trades he announced on draft night fell through two weeks later. He couldn’t live with that lack of control.
by douglast on Jun 30, 2008 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Think..
you’re being really short-sighted. What if Stern announced a trade and it didn’t go through? Here we have not only the commissioner of the most prominent league of basket-balls in the world, but also THE face of such a league. Jerry West aside, I’ve heard numerous and credible accounts that David Stern is, in fact, the model for the NBA player logo. Were this field general, this fine citizen, this man forced to be something amounting to a carny in a dunk-tank I, for one, would be horrified.
This is not some willy-nilly do-what-you-feel league. This is not the last holdover of the sixties hippie abomination. This is no mockery of all we find true and good and wholesome in this world. This is the NBA! Where justice, accuracy and absolution reign above all morals! If the Spaniards attacked in war, Stern would provide the pictures! Were our country’s culture encounter an Alamo, Stern would don a coonskin cap! Were the French to rescind their gift of the statue of liberty, Stern would clutch a torch and raise it proudly aloft!
If, and I only say so considering the gravest of possibilities, our proud nation’s heritage were to plummet to the depths of fun-loving streetball and thrilling dunks, were our country’s #3 pastime to descend to the bankrupt basement inhabited by enforcer-fouls and behavior befitting grown men, were we to fall prey, like savages, to the fleeting enchantments of parity, loyalty and all things the weakest among us call “fair play”, then god help us, for the day will come where the great basketball god will descend upon us with a MIGHTY force to dispel all wickedness from this land.
The slovenly, poor-tempered among us will cling to their false idols of hard-nosed play and paganistic team-before-star righteousness, but WE, we BEdgers will know the real truth – the truth of Sternism! That cities don’t make a team; teams make a city! That teams don’t make multi-million-dollar stadiums; multi-million-dollar stadiums make a team! That Stern’s ways are e’er righteous, as they are the way of Stern. That all flops shall be counted equal. That a referee is never proven wrong until he’s been condemned as a felon.
This is the gospel of David. He has tought us to be upstanding, right and pussy-footing. He has taught us that, in absence of those qualities, being manipulative, conniving and conspiratorial will suffice. He is the Enron of basketball, the Naismith of out-of-court settlements. Let us rejoice in his name, our leader, our savior, our benefactor, our undoing, Mr. David Stern!!
"Well, Travis just showed us that we can go to Travis Outlaw." - Nate McMillan
by 12sharks on Jun 30, 2008 11:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't beat that!
But I will try…
I would point Mr. Stern to baseball and football which, from time to time, has players fail physicals. I would say that those rescinded trades are much less harmful than proposed trades that cannot be completed for several weeks and are subject to change at the GM’s whim. That and the whole “cone of silence” thing are much worse than the 00.1% chance of an announced trade not working out.
Evenso, I think we are getting ahead of ourselves because the NBA will not let teams trade cash for a pick, somehow trading people’s “rights” is more PC…
by da34shadow on Jul 1, 2008 6:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Island of Misfit Toys?
You’ve got some decent ideas. However, I don’t know about number 5. I suppose nobody should take any perverse joy in watching a prospect slip and/or squirm but inevitably it usually happens to somebody. Does mysteriously having them and their families “disappear” at a certain point make things better? Also for a team with a late pick who hasn’t drafted yet, watching that prospect that has slipped IS exciting. “Hey, he’s slipped we have a shot at…...” No I’m afraid that somebody will always have to be the last man sitting…having Dr. Evil press a button and their chair suddenly tips back and they fall into oblivion isn’t the answer.
"Mother Nature started this fight, I think it's about time we ended it!"
by Krang on Jun 30, 2008 11:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think they should talk to them
But they definitely should have a camera on the guy. It should be a wacky crazy camera called the “Slip Cam,” and the announcers should be allowed to draw tears on the screen or money flying out of the guys pocket. Did you watch the NFL draft where Brady Quinn kept slipping? It’s compelling drama. Interviewing the guy is brutal though. I don’t like that idea.
<-;-)
by tominhawaii on Jul 1, 2008 5:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quinn
He was taken backstage. At some point you gotta let the guy get off camera to release a little frustration. The day is coming that a prospect is going to take it out on Stern.
by da34shadow on Jul 1, 2008 6:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















