Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: BTB's Final Preseason NCAA Hoops Bracket

Anatomy of a Pritchslap -- Part 2

In the original version of the post directly below this, I attempted to make 3 points (in order):

1) Pritchard is a genius, having pulled off a great deal with Indiana, a deal that benefitted both teams, required significant wheeling and dealing, and had many moving parts.

2) The off-site press setup this year-- and the access to instant technology, coupled with the pressure to be "first" -- created an absurdist drama and volatile situation that led to many members of the media, including myself, getting pritchslapped by a floated rumored trade for DJ Augustin.

3) Given the reports that came out on Thursday night, the Blazers seem to have engaged in trade talks with the Bobcats regarding DJ Augustin for the #13 pick at the same time as a trade had already been established with Indiana, leading to an indirect pritchslapping of the Bobcats.

Based on the conversation that erupted, my first two points were overshadowed by my speculation on the third point.  Obviously, this was the most contentious point as many felt it questions the "honor" of KP.  This was not my intention; as you may know, I am a self-proclaimed follower of Pritchneesh (a Pritchneeshi, if you will) and did not mean to besmirch him. 

Nevertheless, that was the unintended result.  For this reason, after consulting with Dave, I have removed and clarified those sections in the post below and moved the speculation discussion to this post.

In the original version of the post, here is what I wrote...

Of course, if Pritchard is the big winner here I would argue that the big loser is not, in fact, Indiana. Getting Jack and Rush (and McRoberts, I guess) for the #11 pick, especially given their recent acquisition of point guard TJ Ford, is not a bad haul at all.

The big loser, therefore, is Charlotte. With the #9 pick, they drafted a point guard on behalf of another team, were unable to get that deal completed, and are now stuck in the unenviable position of slotting that player in as a backup when players like Bayless, Lopez, Rush and Randolph (all arguably better fits for their roster) were still available. The worst part: they've surely pissed off Raymond Felton in the process, which could easily lead to a trade of him this off-season. That would leave them with Augustin, a small, untested rookie, and Earl Boykins, a midget, as their two potential starting point guards. Talk about a serious, serious downgrade. Talk about a pritchslap.

I have also sought clarification on the Augustin rumor and received it from a trusted, anonymous source with access to the proceedings.

Here is the latest information that I have for you. 

-- There were talks at some point in the draft process with the Bobcats, however there was no standing offer and no deal on the table for Augustin at the time the rumor was made public.  It is possible that Charlotte drafted Augustin with the intention of trading him to Portland.

-- The Augustin rumor originated from indirect communication (not a telephone call). It was not able to be corrected prior to it becoming more widely known due to the speed with which rumors circulate as previously described.

-- Given the rumor's release and its implications, the organization and all media involved made every effort to correct the record regarding Augustin ASAP, taking the step of confirming the Bayless trade as quickly as possible.

This new information supports the conclusion reached by many of you in the comments (since deleted) and contradicts my earlier presentation on a key point: Charlotte most likely acted independently in drafting Augustin. 

However, to me, this remains a difficult pill to swallow.  The temptation is to write off MJ as an idiot.  Indeed, this is a possibility and there is a track record there.  But picking Augustin for themselves seems really risky for the reasons I mentioned (angering Felton, not a good fit, the other talent, especially Bayless, that was still available at #9). The alternative given this new information is that MJ drafted Augustin in hopes of trading him to Portland (or even another team) without a deal in place.  Again, this is not entirely intelligent but it does seem better than the alternative.   I still lean toward this scenario.  I know many of you feel differently.

So, that begs the (more clearly stated) question: Do you think Charlotte got indirectly pritchslapped, or did they just shoot themselves in the foot?

-- Ben (benjamin.golliver@gmail.com)

PS... A last point: The press setup -- with print media sequestered off-site and relying on indirect communication methods from the team-- created a situation that could have been avoided.   All media acted in good faith, thinking they were presenting the true version of what was going down.  Of course, all team officials also seem to have acted in good faith.  However, it is my opinion that the setup -- with such indirect access to information -- is the culprit here.  Any and all floated rumors, even if unintended, are therefore at least partially the responsibility of the Blazers organization.  All of that being said, it has long been my impression that the Blazers have bent over backwards to make themselves available to the media.  Perhaps this is therefore a case where they simply made themselves too accessible.  Or, playing devil's advocate, maybe this is just more smokescreen?  If you feel strongly one way or another in the comments, please let everyone know.

PPS... If you have access to any additional information that will help clarify this picture, please email me and I will gladly publish it.

0 recs  |  Comment 106 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Either Or

I’m not sure which way I’d prefer this to go, or have went. One way cements KP as the ultimate GM, willing to do anything and everything to get his players at his cost, but the other way seems to be far more likely. Jordan making the mistake of assuming he could make a deal after the fact seems far more likely than KP agreeing to make a deal and then backing out.

As a Blazer fan it makes me less excited to think that my team even considered Augustin in the same realm as Bayless. I’m of the opinion that Bayless is by far the better catch of the two, and he was their true and only target after both got to the #9 spot. Either way, whether this was a 3 team Pritchslap or merely a 2 team Pritchslap, the bottom line is that KP is the best in the business.

by as11osu on Jun 28, 2008 4:51 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yep

I think MJ let his gambling side get the best of him and he made a gut call instead of playing the numbers. He drafted DJ in hopes of trading him to Portland without a firm deal in place.

by damir on Jun 28, 2008 4:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That's the first explanation

that makes any kind of sense to me.

I have really mixed feelings about the whole scenario. I’m proud that KP got his man, and I absolutely love the trade, but it would sour it for me a little if we did it in an especially shady way.

That is, more shady than the typical draft-day smokescreen transaction in the NBA.

"Life is a meaningless sequence of events in between Blazer championships"

by broggerboy19 on Jun 29, 2008 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How do these rules work anyway?

if the teams can’t talk to the media about trades, why can the tell the media about them that first time?

What’s the point of the no trade information rule anyway? And aren’t Wheels et al. for all intents and purposes Blazers employees (or perhaps they actually are), so why can they talk about them?

by Section323 on Jun 28, 2008 4:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

This makes me feel better

In light of the new information, all signs point to Charlotte making bad drafting/trading decisions. As long as we didn’t pull out of an agreement (while a conflicting deal was in place), everything else is legitimate. I’m going to guess it was a mix of Charlotte thinking they could force the Blazers’ hand by picking Augustin and also Charlotte buying into the Augustin hype if the trade didn’t work.

by amitp06 on Jun 28, 2008 4:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm, yeah.

If part of the Blazers’ approach was the smokescreen, working up Blazers-associated hype over players
such as Westbrook, Augustin, Love, Gordon, and Alexander, then the sought end result would be
teams in the top 12 not just going for those players, but outright picking them.

Well, for Augustin, that team was Charlotte.
That they had our perceived desire for DJ in mind SHOULD be part of the picture.
That doesn’t mean we promised them a deal or anything.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 28, 2008 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

think that when Cats where picking KP called them and said that he wants DJ. So MJ asked to give him something like Webster and 13 for DJ, but KP said that he will give them Jack instead of Webster, MJ said no, but was thinking "since they like DJ they will come back to me", so Charlotte drafted DJ. On the other hand KP called Charlotte and purpesly said that he wants Augustine so Charlotte would not pick Bayless, because the price for him would be even greater. KP knew that Bayless would fall all the way to 11, and thats why he called Indiana before the draft and made the deal then. Indiana already just traded for TJ Ford so they didnt need a point guard. But its still is weird why did Indiana didnt ask more for Bayless

by RipCity on Jun 28, 2008 5:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

and

remember the deal that would send us #10 from the Nets for #13, 33, and Jack. As soon as Cats saw that that deal didnt go thru they thought they could MJslap KP, and make him trade for DJ. But it was a smoke sreen all the way saying that the Blazers wanted DJ, because before the draft, there were reports that Bayless is slipping down, and if Seattle wont pick him then nobody else will.

by RipCity on Jun 28, 2008 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just a note of clarificiation

since I see comments and questions popping up on the site.

I think Ben’s piece, both in its original form and now, is very good. I knew the moment I saw it that it would receive wide attention. Because of this there was one precaution we needed to take. In his original piece Ben had included some factual, observation-based information about what the view looked like on draft night from the media room. He also included some provocative and well-thought-out theoretical musings on what might have been behind those observations (e.g. a possible deal, or at least assumed deal, in place with the Bobcats). In the original post the line between the two was somewhat fuzzy, leaving readers open to the idea that there WAS a trade in place with Charlotte that the Blazers backed out of just as there WAS frenzied communication in the media room that night. Not having talked to Kevin Pritchard, Michael Jordan, or anyone on either staff about this issue we couldn’t leave that line unclear, especially since the post was going to be re-echoed throughout the ‘net. My stopgap solution was to put a small disclaimer at the front of the post and leave it as-is. Ben preferred to split the observational and speculative aspects of the post into two posts and two conversations, taking down the original. Since he is the author I left the decision in his hands.

In no way did I disapprove of Ben’s writing, in this story or otherwise. The piece and the conversation surrounding it was, and will be, excellent (as is usual with Ben’s work).

—Dave

by Dave on Jun 28, 2008 5:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ben did a great job in the first place!!!

The difference was there if the reader tried to see it. It’s just that most BBall blogs don’t take that much active reading.

The clarity’s pretty nice as well.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 28, 2008 5:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dave, Dave, Dave...

Of all people. I never expected you to cheat on your BE stats.

by Dave on Jun 28, 2008 2:14 PM HST

Looks like you’re on notice. I’m really not sure how that works with you. Just know that you are on notice.

<-;-)

by tominhawaii on Jun 28, 2008 7:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My two cents

I don’t know if anyone can call this a “Pritchslap” at this point.
Brandon Roy was a Pritchslap. LaMarcus Aldridge was a Pritchslap.
How are we to know that Augustine isn’t going to be the next Brandon Roy, or Deron Williams? Everyone is eager to dismiss him as a bust because he is 5’11” but have you seen the guy play? He has talent, that is a fact.
While Bayless may seem like a better fit for either team right now, Augustine is likely to be a very solid pick if you are trying to change the chemistry of your team. It’s not like they were on track to win anything with Felton running the show. Many times, I have thought to myself that Charlotte is a team full of underachievers. Augustine might be the guy to turn that team around.
Let’s hold off on calling this a Prtichslap until we see what both of these players do at the next level.

So we decided just to call ourselves "The Band". -Richard Manuel

by koyote on Jun 28, 2008 5:16 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think this.

Sacramento got Pritchslapped. Not Charlotte or Indiana. But then, if Augustin ends up being the best player, does KP get Pritchslapped? Can KP Pritchslap himself?

BINGO, BANGO, BONGO

by blzrfan on Jun 28, 2008 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree, kind of

Just hearing a lot of people say that MJ was Pritchslapped. I don’t think that is the case. Neither was Sac, they just got screwed. They should have traded up though.

So we decided just to call ourselves "The Band". -Richard Manuel

by koyote on Jun 28, 2008 5:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree too...

There is a big difference between “Pritchslapping” someone and “backstabbing” someone. Backstabbing is going too far.

by jamon51 on Jun 28, 2008 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think it was backstabbing

It was just a good situation for the Blazers, and a bad situation for Sacramento and maybe for Charlotte. KP is just very good at his job.

So we decided just to call ourselves "The Band". -Richard Manuel

by koyote on Jun 28, 2008 5:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right

that’s why I said I agreed. I think in this case, after hearing what Ben has said, it wasn’t a case of backstabbing—so to say someone got Pritchslapped is a different thing than if they got backstabbed.

by jamon51 on Jun 28, 2008 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Definitely

Not in the definition of “Pritch Slap”.

"Lenny Suckerpunch Never bet on me" - Elizabeth "The Lizzard" Lowblow

by Lizzy Lowblow on Jun 28, 2008 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But WAS Roy a Pritchslap?

In return for that pick, they got the pieces necessary to trade for KG a year ago.
I don’t think Boston could make Roy work for their Pierce team the way KG does,
anymore than KG would make sense on a building young team like Portland.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 28, 2008 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Roy trade ...

was a Pritch-slapping of Minnesota, not Boston. Foye (at #7) and cash for Roy (at #6)? That’s a Pritch-slap if ever I saw one.

"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez

by bfan on Jun 28, 2008 9:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They were just another top-six team that wanted someone else more than Roy.

Unlike the other 5, THEY extorted the schmola outta us for daring to want Roy ourselves!

Jerks.
Maybe PA doesn’t miss the extra millions saved by Minnesota and spent by us, but I would.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 28, 2008 9:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And as for the Minnesota Roy/Foye trade . . .

. . . I don’t think we had anything to do with that.

Our interest in Roy at 7 was obvious, as was the fact that, with Bargnani set for TO and Charlotte gaga for the Stache,
Ty Tom and LMA would go to Chicago and Portland at 2 & 4. Similarly, it was obvious that Minnesota wanted Foye.
(I forget who was at 5; it must’ve been Memphis, I guess. They didn’t seem interested in Roy or Foye.)

Point being, when it came to Minnie at 6, they could’ve just picked their man Foye and we’d’ve picked Roy at 7.
They used their knowledge of this to pick Roy and force us to pick Foye and trade with them, for two reasons:

1) They made us throw in some cash to swing the deal, thereby enjoying some SPAM.
2) By turning Foye from a #6 pick into a #7 pick, they set his rookie-scale contracts for the first four years at a cheaper level.

End result: Same as if we had all just picked who we wanted, plus Minnesota enjoyed extra $$$ on two fronts,
and we ate all that money on their behalf (by upping Roy’s pat scale and swinging SPAM to the Wolves).
Maybe THEY Pricthslapped US; by not getting Roy, they’re no more suckers than the five teams picking ahead of them.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 28, 2008 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree.

First of all, all intentions aside, the mere fact that MN was rating Foye ahead of Roy says something. We had it right, they had it wrong.

But as far as the sequencing, I specifically remember reading the Minnesota actually was picking Roy for another team who would pick Foye and then consummate a trade. The Blazers somehow got wind of this and decided to take Foye instead, knowing that they could then trade for Roy and in so doing leave some other team out in the cold. At least that’s what I remember reading at the time.

"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez

by bfan on Jun 28, 2008 9:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Y'know, that IS ringing a bell.

So then who did we Pritchslap?
Not Minnesota; they were always going to be the team that got Foye and something extra,
by picking Roy for the team they’d then get Foye from.

I guess whoever was trying to do that deal is who got Pritchslapped.
But I could’ve sworn we were openly sold on Roy from the very beginning.
When Minnesota picked him, for whatever reason, we responded by getting what Minnesota wanted for Roy.

You know – like if Sacramento had picked Rush when Indiana scooped up Bayless.
They didn’t need to know what WE were up to; all they needed to act was
knowledge of what Indiana was really after all along, which was Rush + assets.
They slapped themselves, and in 2006, we didn’t slap ourselves.
I don’t see outside mistreatment much in either case.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 28, 2008 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that is exactly the point tho

In 2006 (IIRC), the eminent KP sniffed out the trade that would have denied Portland Roy, and wisely snatched Foye to counter.

This year, with Sacto in a position to do the same thing, it appears that KP leaked a rumor that a Portland trade was already in place for DJ. This rumor may have helped to throw Sacto off the scent, leaving them to wonder if Bayless was being drafted as BPA. Either way, KP managed to pull off what the 3rd team gunning for Roy in the 2006 draft wasn’t able to.

Mystery team gunning for Roy in 2006 got Pritchslapped. Considering the gap between Roy’s and Foye’s success, you can also say Minny got Pritchslapped.

Sacto got Pritchslapped this year. If Bayless turns out much better than Rush, could be that Indiana got it too.

by shralpster on Jun 28, 2008 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But KP wouldn't have needed to sniff out anything.

All he needed to do was see Minnesota take Roy, and quickly (whilst on the clock)
respond by doing whatever Minnesota wanted in exchange for Roy.

Maybe it’s just that Pritchard acts fast and never gives up, whereas Sacramento acted slow and/or gave up
when the only remaining desirable prospect (Bayless) went off the board one spot ahead of them.
And same goes (mildly) for San Antonio regarding Batum; when he went at 25 to Houston,
right as the Spoors were prepared to take him at 26, they could’ve discerned what Houston wanted for him
and acted, even though there was the pressing time issue, as they were on the clock.

Pritchard doesn’t give up on his guy, and he reacts fast. That’s all it would take.
And it’s much, much harder than it sounds.

Pritchard IS The Wolf from Pulp Fiction.

“I’m Winston Wolfe. I solve problems . . . If I’m curt with you it’s because time is a factor.
I think fast, I talk fast and I need you guys to act fast . . . “

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 29, 2008 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was Houston

I remember it vividly…

Minny at 6, us at 7, Houston at 8. Houston wanted Roy, Minny wanted Foye, and we were believed to want Gay if we couldn’t get Roy (or, simply Gay and not Roy at all).

Houston and Minny make a deal: draft for each other and swap. They did not know KP knew, or realized a deal was in place. They figured that Minny would secure Roy for Houston, Portland would say “drats” and take Gay, and Houston would take Foye and then Minny could pay their guy less AND Houston would get who they wanted.

Obviously, KP took Foye and that froze Houston out of the trade, and forced Minny to deal with us. Since Minny wanted Foye more than Roy, it was a good deal for both teams since that small market but not really rich team got to have some of PA’s cash and pay a lower salary for their lottery pick, and we got our beloved Roy.

Houston says they got enough of this draft noise, and draft Gay and trade him to Memphis for ‘help now’ in the form of Battier.

For KP to know this would work, he has to know or make an educated guess that a deal is in place between Minny and Houston. How could he know that Minny didn’t really want Roy? That is the mystery of KP, and something other GMs trying to do this might be averse to taking the risk.

If it doesn’t work, we end up with Foye, a guy we didn’t want. I know I was confused with the draft pick when it happened…

This is how the complete pre-prep that KP and his staff do comes into play, I’m sure. They got a plan hatched to get the dude they want, should that dude be taken by someone else.

I think it is realistic to believe the Bobcats tried to do a KP move and took DJ Augustin with a trade in mind, and KP kinda hinted at that in his post draft interview when he said some teams were just drafting to make a speculative deal.

The Bobcats could also just like DJ a lot, who knows. If they tried to KP, KP, they obviously failed.

Unlike us in 2006, when we sniffed out the deal going on between Minny and Houstin, Petrie and the Kings didn’t appear to realize what was happening or didn’t want to involve themselves somehow. This is another beautiful thing about KP: he really does appear to do what it takes to get the dude they decide to target.

Oh, by the way, the team that picked #5 was ATLANTA, and they drafted the amazing Sheldon Williams.

Who got Pritchslapped? Whoever didn’t draft Roy, if you ask me—and pretty much anyone coulda’ gotten into that lottery to snag him, because those draft picks were majorly undervalued at that time, since it was supposed to be ‘the worst draft ever’. Obviously, that was hyperbole.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 30, 2008 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Augustine was a good pick. They’re sick of Felton and wanted a real point guard.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Jul 1, 2008 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

KP wasn't the problem

Indiana was the problem. I would assume there were a number of talks with Charlotte AND New Jersey so the Blazers could move up. Everyone knew that both Indiana and Sacramento were going to pick up Bayless/Augustin/Westbrook if they were available. I think the problem for Charlotte was Indiana pulling off the TJ Ford trade just before Draft day, which brought another trade partner in the mix. Once that trade happened, Charlotte had to have seen what was coming. I think the real twist is that KP may have over hyped Augustin, knowing that Bayless had a chance to fall. But lets get real, this is the poker game that every GM in the league plays, including Charlotte.

by Stumptown Doug on Jun 28, 2008 5:22 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That's exactly right

KP can be happy that Larry Legend and Brian Colangelo got the O’Neal – Ford deal done a day before the draft to give him this option. Indiana definitely wanted a solid point guard secured going into July hoping to get rid of their team cancer Tinsley asap and preferably during this offseason. I always felt that this was the team to get ahead of, cause they would take the last guy available from the Bayless/Mayo/Westbrook/Augustin group. After Lawson pulled out it seemed much more likely that Portland would end up without a good point guard addition in this draft. Without Ford going to Indiana in advance it can be assumed that we would have had to either pay a much steeper price, settle for Augustin or even no point guard.

Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...

by Norsktroll on Jun 29, 2008 7:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jordan got greedy..

I think MJ told KP he’d do a deal, then tried to extort an unfair trade by asking for to much.
So KP said “OK then draft DJ for us” (really wanting Bayless). Then he does the better deal with Pacers. BAM! MJ… Don’t try to mess with KP. Now you’re stuck holding the player you drafted just to get more players from the Blazers (Frye & Jack) .

Again MJ tried to extort us and got himself Pritch-Slapped.

by Rick D. on Jun 28, 2008 5:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Pritchneesh

Hilarious reference, bagwan. Just plain funny!

There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man — with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)

My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.

by johnv59 on Jun 28, 2008 5:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

finally someone is with me on that :)

nobody mentioned that the first time around

"Honor Terry Porter." Email me with your TP stories and memories.

by Ben. on Jun 28, 2008 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yikes, that reference gives me the chills

I live out near Antelope a.k.a. Rajneesh, OR. Hopefully, KP doesn’t end up like the Baghwan.

So we decided just to call ourselves "The Band". -Richard Manuel

by koyote on Jun 28, 2008 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for clarifying,

I finally get it. That was good, Ben.

by premthegrem on Jun 28, 2008 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am a member

Gots my “Pink Tie” on.

"Lenny Suckerpunch Never bet on me" - Elizabeth "The Lizzard" Lowblow

by Lizzy Lowblow on Jun 28, 2008 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A new entry to Blazers lexicon

Pritchneesh now is listed next to Prtich-slapped in the Blazers dictionary.

There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man — with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)

My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.

by johnv59 on Jun 28, 2008 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pritchneesh

Verb, one who follows GM Kevin Prtichard’s movements with unfailing faithfulness. In KP we trust, he will do the deal.

There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man — with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)

My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.

by johnv59 on Jun 28, 2008 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

noun :)

but yes, you’ve got it!

"Honor Terry Porter." Email me with your TP stories and memories.

by Ben. on Jun 28, 2008 6:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

actually,

I thought people that followed Rajneesh were called Rajneeshis, which would make KP followers Pritchneeshis, right?

by premthegrem on Jun 28, 2008 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

very good point

i am a pritchneeshi.

thanks for clearing that up.

"Honor Terry Porter." Email me with your TP stories and memories.

by Ben. on Jun 28, 2008 10:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

pritchneeshi

We all seem to be pritchneeshi’s. I have an idea, let’s move to central Oregon and… oh, forget it…

There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man — with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)

My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.

by johnv59 on Jun 28, 2008 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pritchneesh, Pritch-slapped, and "objective" journalism

I, too, thought “Pritchneesh” was funny, and, like a lot of funny things, also has a bit of truth to it. There is a side-bar debate going on over the term “Pritch-slapped,” and, again, with a bit of truth as to how one reacts to a clever but perhaps overused, sexist, macho, non-PC term. It is somewhat strange how contibutors follow the no-swear-words(or even symbols), but glom onto Pritch-slapped as a way of being macho. But what are sports blogs for?

So what is the deal with Portland media and their seeming willingness to be Pritchneesh and drink whatever Kool-aid or inhale any smoke that Pritchard puts out and call it all good? Seems to me that Pritchard abused/used the media as much as he abused/used his fellow GMs. As I was listening to the draft, it seemed like Pritchard used Brian Wheeler as his smoke generator, but everyone seems to inhale/drink whatever crap KP puts out for fear that they will be cut off.

I think with any negotiation there is some smoke-blowing from each side and no deal is done until there is mutual agreement. When is that “mutual agreement” point reached? Cannot one question whether KP crossed the ethical line without having to retract what were speculations based on the smoke that KP was blowing?

I like the draft outcome and I look forward to how the new team members work out (or not). However, I think I’ll stay off the Pritchneesh compound and view any deals from an arm’s length distance.

by vcubed on Jun 28, 2008 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

rain on our parade

and kick our dog while you are at it

There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man — with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)

My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.

by johnv59 on Jun 28, 2008 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

smart man

let’s not lose sight of the possibility that KP crossed the line in this year’s draft. I’m not saying he did, but I’m not ruling it out either.

I guess ignorance is bliss.

"Life is a meaningless sequence of events in between Blazer championships"

by broggerboy19 on Jun 29, 2008 12:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll believe it if KP or anyone in the war room says it happened as depicted.

My gut tells me that KP is not, never has been and never will be underhanded in his professional dealings. He’s daring, he’s intelligent, he’s a very good judge of basketball talent, he has a way of instilling teamwork in those around him, he’s personable and he isn’t underhanded, luckily. He loves his job and he is very, very good at what he does. His ceiling has not been reached. So speaketh the soothsayer. :p

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Jun 29, 2008 3:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with your gut.

It’s what my gut tells me too.

by premthegrem on Jun 29, 2008 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd be curious

I’d be curious to know what was said between Charlotte and Portland. I hope we didn’t explicitly say “Take Augustine and we’ll trade you pick 13 and X”. If you tell a team to take a player, with certain conditions in place for you to end up with that player you shouldn’t back out.

To do that, knowing you have a different deal in place and just say it so they don’t pick your player is completely wrong.

I have no clue if that is what happened, and I hope it isn’t what happened. If you do that as a GM too much you’ll find yourself without partners to trade with.

by Replacement Level Poster on Jun 28, 2008 5:34 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm pretty sure Ben

was trying to say there’s no evidence that that happened. He was alluded that KP blew smoke. Blowing smoke is a whole lot different than simply renegging.

That said, I hope it didn’t happen as well. Doesn’t sound like it did, thankfully.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Jun 28, 2008 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Guess I wasn’t clear. I don’t think that is what happened either. I also hope it didn’t happen. With the way everything unfolded though makes you curious what really happened.

by Replacement Level Poster on Jun 28, 2008 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chad Ford

Said that the bobcats were trying to trade Felton leading up the draft. I don’t think there was any funny business, Bobcats don’t like Felton and thought it was time to move on.

I’m a D.J. Augustin admirer, and I think he’ll be an improvement over Raymond Felton eventually. The Bobcats were shopping Felton before the draft and I think they’ll keep doing it now.
-Chad Ford

From Chad Ford’s draft grades and Chad Ford’s podcast

Joel Freeland=Stud

by hightide on Jun 28, 2008 5:44 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

good find

this makes the Cats pick look more legit

myspace.com/marktwainindians

by mark twain on Jun 28, 2008 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fans don't seem upset

http://www.bobcatsplanet.com/vb/showthread.php?t=7399

The Bobcat fans don’t seem too upset with their pick (as least by page 3…). It seems like if there was any hint of KP using unethical means to screw Charlotte with Augustin, that at least a few fans would be mentioning it online.

by OutrageousJ on Jun 28, 2008 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

he has been on the block for awhile

i advocated us getting felton back in march or april…

there’s a big difference between shopping someone and drafting their replacement …

that can’t be a pretty locker room situation.

"Honor Terry Porter." Email me with your TP stories and memories.

by Ben. on Jun 28, 2008 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

there are romours of him goin to NY in exchange for Lee.

by Falcao on Jun 28, 2008 5:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed...

Augustin is a much better fit under Larry Brown- and Brown doesn’t like Felton.

by The Graduate on Jun 29, 2008 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent comments

I agree wholeheartedly.

by OrygunRod on Jun 28, 2008 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your are exactly correct...

... as to the deregatory term adopted by this website and repeated by our fans. It is entirely inappropriate and denigrates, frequently without justification, well-meaning hard-working people in the business of professional basketball, and moreover creates an aura of superiority on our part that is, in reality, demeaning to ourselves.

by blazerwizard on Jun 28, 2008 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." -- RIP George Carlin

by Corvid on Jun 28, 2008 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Recced.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on Jun 28, 2008 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's funny,

This entire discussion seems to be more about explaining what seemed to be a strange pick by Charlotte, as we can’t seem to understand what was going through MJ’s mind. It almost seems more plausible to believe that they got screwed deliberately by us, since the pick by itself makes no sense whatsoever. But as Ben and Dave have indicated, Charlotte picked DJ Augustin all by themselves.

by premthegrem on Jun 28, 2008 6:16 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Blazers Edge

Do I get any credit for smelling out the deal between the two teams?

I started with one and switched to another… between reading the reports and comments of the teams and knowing both of their teams and wants…. I just knew something was a brewing….. Just curious if you guys remembered my contribution, haha…. have a great season, you have a pretty good team!

Brent Jonathan Beck

by Brent Beck on Jun 28, 2008 6:21 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

no

you get no credit. You had some half baked idea that we’d end up with TInsley which was ridiculous! You get credit for making me laugh though!

myspace.com/marktwainindians

by mark twain on Jun 28, 2008 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You were right about a deal existing,

but not the guy. I will say, you guys kept the Rush stuff really well hushed up. There wasn’t even a sniff on national news about indiana being interested in trading down for him (although I wasn’t exactly searching it out.). I’ll give you a rec for calling it half right, being able to do even that is impressive, considering that this draft was predicted to be, and went, crazy.

by premthegrem on Jun 28, 2008 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Touche Nope

um the next day I said we might trade TJ Ford for the 13th pick, I feel as if Jerryd Bayless for the 13th pick is pretty similar…. but alright… I actually deleted the article because so many of the Blazers fans were so overly rude to me for no reason, but thanks for the consideration, and not knowing your facts straight.

Brent Jonathan Beck

by Brent Beck on Jun 28, 2008 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

I don’t think the people here were overly rude to you in that post, and I followed it (and posted in it) fairly closely.

You did draw some ire, for sure, but I think most of it was caused by your delivery, and not by your ideas necessarily, and I think it was mostly fair criticism.

by douglast on Jun 28, 2008 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry,

I rec’d the wrong guy. I got it right now.

by premthegrem on Jun 29, 2008 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Magician...

This deal is also a perfect example of what separates the Blazers ownership and front office from almost every other team in the league. I would be willing to bet that they had a colloborative effort that fleshed out every possible draft scenario that focused on success and making the team better. Not on who got credit, not on saving a few dollars. Then Mr. Allen handed the reins to KP and allowed him to do what he does best. Moves could be made quickly and smoothly. They had a plan for everything and then probably contingency plans for those plans.

Having had a chance to think about the situation, I believe that it only could have happened under very narrow circumstances. Every domino had to fall just right. Charlotte had to believe that Augustin was Option 1 for the Blazers, Indiana had to believe that they had more to lose by keeping Bayless than trading him to the Blazers, and Sacramento had to think that Bayless was off the table because of the supposed Charlotte deal.

The Blazers also put all of the focus on Westbrook, Augustin, and Alexander pre-draft. I remember thinking it was strange that the media were reporting the supposed top people on the Blazer draft board. In hindsight, a beautiful magic trick that added to the mystery on draft day. Listening to KP interviews right after the draft, I sensed a distinct giddiness that I had never heard from him before. I don’t think he could believe that he and the Blazers had really done it.

by FeelTheLove on Jun 28, 2008 6:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Charlotte wanted the pick!

If MJ didn’t want the pick, he could have easily called Sacramento and worked a deal with them! Everybody knew Sacramento was going to draft a PG and you can bet that Petrie called both the Pacers and Hornets before they made their “reach” selection for the kid from Rider?

I read the Charlotte Observer today. MJ and Brown want a “pass first” guard. D.J. is a better fit for the direction they want to go. Frankly, Charlotte is a mess and MJ has proven he doesn’t know a thing about being a player personnel decisions! Both picks were bad a decision based on their current roster!

Thank your lucky stars you aren’t a Bobcat fan. Charlotte had a chance to take B.Lopez for Center and move Okafer to PF and they pass to take what appears they are going to use as a PG backup. I’m sure Augustin is excited about his opportunity to be a backup on a crappy team in the east! These guys are a mess!

by RIP CITY on Jun 28, 2008 7:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

rumor

that when Bobcats picked DJ, Jason Quick messeged KP, “Is this your guy?’ By the time KP had seen the messege it was Pacers selecting Bayless(KP was Busy), so KP replyed yes. So here is where the rumor came out about portland trading with Bobcats. This is a rumor too.

by RipCity on Jun 28, 2008 8:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure about the "too much accessiblilty" part

Perhaps it is a poor idea to lock dozens of media members in the same room, as it creates a ripple effect for reporting, coupled with the obvious connotations of the old kid’s game “post office”, where you started whispering a message on one end of the chain and had a good laugh when you saw what it sounded like on the other end. I tend to believe that people will do what they’re trained to do. Media folks will get the scoop and report, sometimes even when there’s no scoop yet. (This is the same reason, by the way, you don’t send soldiers or riot police out unless you really mean to use them.) Nobody’s intentionally doing anything wrong. Stuff just happens.

I would guess in this case stuff just happened. A miscommunication here, a jumped gun there, a bunch of people running around the corner and looking at the sky to see what the first guy saw when he did it. The simplest explanation is probably that Michael Jordan liked DJ Augustin and maybe is looking to move Ray Felton while the Blazers’ deal with Indiana was set well before the draft even started.

That’s not nearly as much fun, however!

—Dave

by Dave on Jun 28, 2008 8:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What's to stop

Sacramento from making a trade now for Augustin or if Charlotte really wants to keep him, for Felton? Nothing.

What is amazing about KP to me is how he fore saw that Bayless would fall all the way to 11 and how he had the foresight to have the trade with Indiana ready. Expecting that Rush would be available at 13 was almost conventional wisdom about the draft. Larry Bird got his man and Jarret Jack in addition.

by OrygunRod on Jun 28, 2008 8:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hey, no kidding.

Sacramento should be making a play for Felton.
Totally.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 28, 2008 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A few thoughts ...

1. I disagree with those who keep disparaging Augustine’s abilities. I doubt many of us have even seen him play that much, and I’m guessing most of those comments are based on the fact that he’s 5-11 and reminds people of Stoudamire. Fact is that even though he’s short, he’s absolutely a better playmaker than Damon ever was in terms of setting up his teammates.

2. As an extension of thought #1, I disagree with those who are calling MJ an idiot for making THIS pick. Clearly MJ has made many a mistake throughout his executive career, but I don’t think this pick is necessarily one of them. At least not until we know how good he’ll be. Are we forgetting who the new Bobcat coach is? Mister “I love pure point guards” himself, Larry Brown. For my money, I’m betting Brown told Mike, “Look, I can’t do anything with this guy Felton. You need to get me a real point guard, and I need him now.’ Hence the Augustin pick. The notion that they might be able to consummate a trade with Portland to get even more value out of the pick probably stoked their fire a bit for Augustin. But I don’t think for a second Charlotte acted on the knowledge that they might pull a trade without thinking to themselves, “Well, this trade might not go down, so are we going to be happy with this pick if we have to keep him?” I’m guessing they answered yes to that question before they made the pick.

3. I agree with someone else (forgot who) who questioned calling this a pritch-slapping of either team. Clearly KP manipulated the draft to get the player he wanted, but who’s to say he got the best player? They all have potential, but nobody knows anything yet, and nobody will until they all play some games.

4. Lastly, to expand on the previous point, I don’t know that you can judge this trade at all on a basis of who got which player. Bayless and Augustin are completely different players! One excels at scoring the basketball while the other excels at setting up his teammates. If they both did the exact same thing and Bayless did it significantly better, and yet we convinced Charlotte that Augustin indeed did those things better, then yeah, you could say we pulled one over ‘em. But that’s not the case. It’s all about what a team values. We valued scoring because we already have a number of playmakers on our team, so Bayless was our guy. If Roy wasn’t such the playmaker, then you very well might have seen us make a deal for Augustin instead.

"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez

by bfan on Jun 28, 2008 9:37 PM PDT reply actions   4 recs

Now, THAT . . . was a solid post.

Me likey.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 28, 2008 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great points

Bayless could’ve gone 4th or 7th, but he didn’t. As far as we know, there are no character issues or recently surfaced injury concerns. Fact is, Bayless was the SIXTH guard picked in a relatively weak draft. Granted, the Blazers were one of the only teams that could fit a tweener. Everyone looks great on YouTube around draft time.

Bayless may or may not be any good – we need to remember that before we rule a definitive judgement of whether this was a Pritchslap, Airslap, or Birdslap.

by Engineering Problem on Jun 28, 2008 11:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Charlotte wanted either Westbrook or Augustin. They had a deal in place with Seattle, but backed out because Seattle wanted too much. Jordan wanted Westbrook. LB wanted Augustin.

We ended up with Augustin.

There was no way Charlotte was going to select Bayless or Lopez. Okafor is a center. He sucks at Power Forward. Lopez can’t play PF. So why take Lopez to be the third center behind Nazr?

Bayless is not a PG, hes a combo guard who can handle the ball. Charlotte doesn’t need one of those, they have one (Felton). Charlotte has been searching everyhwere for a true, pass-first PG since Knight left, and they went out and got one.

There is a lot of bias against MJ because of the decisions he has made in Washington. The only bad decision he has made in Charlotte was hiring Sam Vincent, but I believe he wanted LB last year but LB said no. Now he has a great coach. The J-Rich trade was brilliant.

Blazer fans think they could have had a deal with Charlotte because they think they wanted Jarrett Jack. That is not the case. Jack paired with Felton is not a good PG combo at all. Both had limited court vision, take too many shots, and can’t finish. Jack would quit the NBA if he had to play for LB.

Again I think a lot of this “What is Charlotte doing?” is accredited to the media and their total lack of a clue to what the Charlotte Bobcats are. They think Okafor can play PF, when thats like asking Ben Wallace in his prime to play PF. They think Felton is an up and coming PG, when in reality he has probably peaked and is an average PG at best in a PG’s league. They have no clue who is Ajinca is or why LB would pick him. So if fans of other teams try to pass off blogs as smart information, you should probably stop following the media to get your Bobcats information.

by amcoolio on Jun 28, 2008 9:53 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Just to clarify ...

I’m guessing you’re a Charlotte fan. I think some people might be confused by your use of the pronoun “we,” this being a Blazer site and all.

But thanks for the opinion. You are welcome here, and I agree with your thoughts.

"These are dreams that we have." --Rudolfo Fernandez

by bfan on Jun 28, 2008 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn't Adam Morrison a Jordan pick?

If so, that’s another bad decision by MJ. Not exactly sure either how the Richardson trade was brilliant either. Golden State actually got better by trading him.

LB is a great coach when he wants to be. Two years of losing in Charlotte and he’ll be moving on.

by Lance Uppercut on Jun 28, 2008 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have a hard time believing

that Felton is an “average” point guard or that he has trouble finishing. He may be a scoring point guard, but in both games against Portland last year he completely diced our team with quick dribble penetration to find the open man and never had any trouble at the rim.

Of course that doesn’t make him an exception to the rule, our defense was at times porous, but he still struck me as a very athletic and skilled point that could be in the upper echelon of 1’s in the league if not for a questionable attitude.

In all honesty I would have been open to having Felton play for our team any day of the week.

But you’re closer to the situation so I’ll give your comment on Raymon the benefit of the doubt.

"Life is a meaningless sequence of events in between Blazer championships"

by broggerboy19 on Jun 29, 2008 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Other team's motives

I have noticed a tendency for BEdgers to completely miss the boat when it comes to figuring out other team’s motives and needs, especially when it comes to trade rumors… although this is hardly unique to BE.

DJ was getting some HUGE hype leading up to the draft, drawing comparisons to prolific PG’s, past and present. He supposedly wowed the Blazers at his workout. If DJ ends up being half as good as the hype, Charlotte will be lucky to have him.

But I’m still ecstatic with Bayless for our team (even over DJ and over Westbrook).

MLB2PDX!!! (someday...)

by The Cactus Leaguer on Jun 29, 2008 12:34 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Duck for cover, Ben...

man, this is getting out of control over such silly stuff.

Oh, and take it easy with that Pritchneesh thing… people might catch on that it’s a reference (the Rajneeshees don’t have such a favorable rep after all), and then you’ll be under fire again.

We don't NEED the draft. -Mortimer 6/18

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Jun 29, 2008 12:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

bad taste

umm I guess what ever it takes i guess the picture you just painted leaves a bad taste in my mouth.. but at the same time you have to step on toes to get to the top.. I say we just sit back and realize that mr pritchard and mr allen are committed to getting us hardware ..and let them do what they do

if it can be conceived it can be achieved

by lyfefindsaway on Jun 29, 2008 2:20 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

consider this

In the process of getting the players you want in the draft, I’m sure trying to misdirect your rivals is all part of the game. However, I seriously doubt that one GM would agree to a trade scenario with another GM and then renege on the offer. You’d be able to do that once. After that word would get around and you would lose all abililty to make any legitimate trades. Mr. Pritchard does not strike me as someone who would take that kind of risk. Therefore, the likelyhood that there was any trade agreement on the table with Charlotte is nil. Just my opinion.

by rockman on Jun 29, 2008 5:12 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

"Smoke and Mirrors"

It’s important that you listen to KP’s comments to understand the sophistication involved in getting Bayless. KP stated that Bayless was the 4th best player on the board, and that he and Allen targeted Bayless as the player they wanted. At the same time, KP called this the “smoke and mirrors” draft. In the beginning, however, Bayless was the 4th best player on numerous mock drafts and on the boards of a number of other GM’s. Initially, keep in mind that Rose and Mayo were going to be taken in the 1 to 3 slots. At that point, KP knew that there were 5 teams drafting ahead of Portland interested in guards. These were Seattle, San Diego, Charlotte, Indiana and Sacramento. However, only Bayless and Gordon were projected to go in the top 10 in the beginning, whereas Augustin and Westbrook were projected in the 10 – 13 slots on most boards. This meant 4 guards were left for the 5 teams drafting ahead of Portland. KP, therefore, had to do several things. Initially, he needed another guard in the mix so that there’d be 5 available for those 5 teams, and that guard became Brandon Rush of Kansas, who was projected in the 15 or higher slots. Then, he needed to promote Westbrook, Augustin and Rush into the top 11 along with Gordon and Bayless.

This is where the “smoke and mirrors” began, and there were four basic components to the campaign. Initially, keep in mind that KP was having ongoing and daily conversations with every GM drafting ahead of him about trading up and/or trading players. In these conversations he undoubtedly began to focus these other GM’s on the players “he said” he wanted, which were Westbrook, Augustin and Rush. This began to influence these other GM’s to take a harder look at these players. Secondly, he reinforced this by trying out Augustin, Westbrook and Rush, and then publicly praising them. Now, in those converations, he also undoubtedly focussed on the strengths of these three players. Westbrook had an excellent defensive record against all the other top guards he’d played against and was very athletic, Augustin was the one pure point guard in the mix who had not only won the Bob Cousy award, but was also an excellent shooter, and Rush, at 6’6” with long arms was the one “pure” shooting guard in the mix who had the maturity to start playing right away and the ability to defend “any” NBA shooting guard. The third component was to enhance these players at the expense of
Bayless. This falls along the lines of “I like Bayless”, but, I like this about X other player. The fourth element is to understand that KP also knows the other GM’s and their biases. Presti at Seattle, out of San Antonio, likes lock down defensive players and Brown in Charlotte has always liked “pure” point guards to run his offense. KP, as a result, simply reinforced these views and then promoted the player to those GM’s and Coaches that fit their own biases. Now, the final piece of this was when Indiana swapped Neal for Ford – giving Indiana a pure point guard – because this opened up a slot for Rush to play along side Ford.

Now on draft day, KP commented that his draft board was accurate for the first 15 picks. He knew exactly what everyone was looking for by then. After all, he’d had 100’s of hours of conversations with the other 12 teams drafting in front of him, and knew what they were going to do. Remember that he told the press that morning that he’d already received 4 trade offers, and there were more coming. He, in sum, had them all in the loop.

Now, as the draft played out, his influence and the “smoke and mirror” campaign came to fruition. Initially, the first sign was when Seattle swapped their 4 for San Diego’s 7. San Diego then took Gordon, and Seattle took Westbrook. Then came Charlotte, who took Augustin, the pure point guard that Brown has historically favored to run his offense. This left Rush and Bayless. Indiana, having traded for Ford, wanted the pure SG/Defender to supplement Ford. However, the trade had them take Bayless, because KP knew Sacramento would grab Bayless at 12. The gamble, of course, was that Sacramento would not take Rush, and, rather, would go for another need at center. Now, KP and Indiana must’ve known this would happen, or the deal with Indiana could not have worked. And both GM’s of Indiana and Portland had likely had the conversations with Sacramento over the previous 3 weeks that led them to believe that Rush was not as high on Sacramento’s board as their needs at center if he was the only available player. Had KP and Indiana not of been absolutely certain of this, KP would’ve had to have had another trade in mind to make this work. But he stayed with the Indiana trade, and so we got Bayless.

Now, in the end, KP’s strategy worked. He promoted Augustin, Westbrook and Rush into the top 11. He reinforced the biases of Presti in Seattle and Brown in Charlotte, and got a little lucky when Indiana traded for Ford, and then reinforced Bird’s decision to remake the team by going for maturity and experience in the draft (which Bird has repeated since the draft) – meaning he liked Rush, the oldest and most experienced of these guards who was a good fit with Ford.

It was an excellent strategy. No GM got “conned”. Not really. However, I have no doubt that they did get “influenced”, and in that there is always a little con. But this is not unethical.

Remember that a few days before the draft, KP commented to Barrett that if someone was praising a player, they weren’t going to draft him, and that all the GM’s lie, and so did he. They were all trying to manipulate the other guy to improve their position.

What KP did was classic misdirection. His interest, and his reputation, caused other GM’s to begin to ignore Bayless and instead, look harder at Westbrook, Augustin and Rush, which, when added to Rose, Mayo and Gordon, put 7 guards in play and it worked.

Hat’s off.

by Eben Calder on Jun 29, 2008 6:50 AM PDT reply actions   2 recs

Who is San Diego?

hee hee that’s funny.

by TallTimber on Jun 29, 2008 7:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Clips of course

GO says " Sir, you fornicated vertically…observe the consequences!

by 92wastheyear on Jun 29, 2008 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know its the Clips

They haven’t been there in some 20 years. I don’t if Eben meant to be funny but I thought it was.

by TallTimber on Jun 29, 2008 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eben has been calling them

San Diego for multiple posts…you would have to ask him why …I haven’t caught that part yet

GO says " Sir, you fornicated vertically…observe the consequences!

by 92wastheyear on Jun 29, 2008 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Sacramento Gamble

I agree it was a gamble to hope they wouldn’t take Rush, but the odds were pretty much stacked in KP’s favor since the Kings have 80 million wing players who are decent, and Rush would just give them 80 million and 1.

Doesn’t take anything away from what KP did. Nothing has come out that says it was pure dumb luck, and in the past KP has been known to make his own luck.

He called this the smokescreen draft, and he played it perfectly.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 30, 2008 1:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 rec

Very good breakdown. Whether it’s accurate or not, I’m not sure. But it certainly sounds plausible.

by jamon51 on Jun 30, 2008 8:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

After two posts, a retraction and a myriad of clarifications...

...where are we? Still speculating. Not until we hear from the principles will we know the truth.

The real issue here is the very human tendency to value “news” over fact. It’s the natural course of things to want to bring that juicy steak to a salivating public. That’s why it’s so important for those in the business of providing information to exercise objectivity and restraint.

I appreciate Ben’s unique inside edge. I like his writing. I accept his clarification.

Could we move on now? When the gag order is lifted, perhaps we’ll learn what really went down.

by Dr Dave on Jun 29, 2008 7:20 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

All in the Game

I agree. My post was simply to provide a perspective on one player – KP. But keep in mind. Every team has experienced GM’s and Owners who’ve been through many drafts. Every team has their preferred picks, and everyone attempts to manipulate the other guy to get an advantage, or to try to direct the other guy away from the player they want. To pretend that anyone truly conned or deceived someone else is to assume first that the one being conned isn’t knowledgeable or competent, or thoroughly experienced in how these drafts are manipulated. After all, every team is owned by men with hundreds of millions of dollars, and in making that money, none of them are exactly virgins. I don’t think KP did anything outside of the rules of this particular game. He just did it in a way that ensured, to the best of his ability, that he got the guy he wanted. And everyone else was trying to do the same thing. If you read the other boards, you’ll also see no blogs about how KP and Portland ripped anyone else off. They’re all big boys. SD wanted Gordon, Presti wanted Westbrook, Brown (and this has came out yesterday) says he was always high on Augustin, Indiana liked Rush as the off-guard to Ford. And Sacramento didn’t think Rush was a better pick for them than taking a center. That’s the bottom line. We’re not dealing with children here. They played the game – KP played the game.

by Eben Calder on Jun 29, 2008 8:11 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

RIP "Pritchslap"

I love KP, and I love the Bayless trade, but when can we officially retire the phrase “pritchslap?” Now? Please? It’s already old and tired.

by Jack Acid on Jun 29, 2008 10:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The official transactions make the deals seem even more complicated

“In a three-team trade, Portland acquires the draft rights to Nicolas Batum from Houston; Houston acquires the draft rights to Donte Greene and second-round selection in 2009 from Memphis plus Joey Dorsey from Portland; and Memphis acquires the draft rights to Darrell Arthur from Portland.”

“In a three-team trade, Chicago acquires the draft rights to Omer Asik from Portland; Portland acquires a second-round pick in 2009 from Denver plus two future second-round picks from Chicago; and Denver acquires the draft rights to Sonny Weems from Chicago.”

Should it worry us that the Bayless deal isn’t officially announced by the NBA yet?

Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...

by Norsktroll on Jun 29, 2008 10:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No Worry

No. The date for announcing all trades involving existing players is July 9. The theory is that the NBA wants the time to make sure the cap/salary whatever rules haven’t been violated. None of the other trades have been announced either.

by Eben Calder on Jun 29, 2008 10:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Well, in this case

the salaries definitely do not match under this year’s numbers. The teams have to wait until the 2008-09 year rolls around in July to clear the trade under the cap.

—Dave

by Dave on Jun 29, 2008 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You will find:

1. KP was in discussions with every team in the league before the draft.

2. KP knew who the other teams were going to pick. It’s not really that hard for a guy in the know. If Draft Express can do it, KP can as well.

3.The first thing that was leaked was that Portland would be taking Rush at 13. This was info given to Ben from Quick, which came from either Nate or KP. It matched a lot of the mocks, including Chad Ford’s.

4. The Charlotte rumour came next, from Ben via Quick, 1 minute before Sacramento made their pick and Bayless was already off the board. It was said this information came from KP. As Ben stated, this was a mistake. Chad Ford, Wheels, and 95.5 had the correct info out there 2 minutes later when Portland was on the clock.

5. Was the Charlotte rumour leaked to throw off Sacramento? Sacramento anticipated DJ or Bayless would make it to 12, so they didn’t have a trade in place. Indiana had just picked up TJ and traded JO, they would probably pick a big. Portland was probably picking Rush. When Indiana picked Bayless, Sacramento did not know if Indiana picked for themselves or someone else. They simply ran out of time to explore options and picked the guy who they felt was the BPA for them after Bayless came off the board. Regardless, the rumour WAS NOT leaked to throw off Sacramento – it came one minute before their pick was announced and could not have any impact on their decision.

Nothing under-handed here, simply typical draft night dealings…

Blazermania - It's not just for die-hards anymore.

by Blazerholic on Jun 29, 2008 11:34 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think I posted everything I thought on the original thread

But I wanted to say that I still think Ben wrote a good piece and I never really had issue with it. I see why people got a little worked up about it, as did I, but I just know that if it had really been something this bad, it would have gotten out by now thru a source.
All in all, I want to say good job Ben for bringing us the story, standing true to your initial thoughts, and giving us something to talk about

I remember the good old days. The Rasta Monsta days.

by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 29, 2008 12:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

At least

This explains why I was so confused in the open thread. What I was watching on ESPN did not match what I was reading here. I had no idea what was going on. I might be too old for open threads.

<-;-)

by tominhawaii on Jun 29, 2008 1:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

where's fatty when you need him?

he’s the king of wild speculation and thoughts covering the spectrum of opinion.

I like your insight, Ben. I appreciate that you were able to go and witness that, and then to write it down and give us your own account of the evening. Please, keep up the great work.

We don't NEED the draft. -Mortimer 6/18

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Jun 29, 2008 4:02 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Facts disagree w/ you Ben

This is a nice topic to speculate on, but the facts all add up against this being true.

1st, many mock drafts had Charlotte picking a PG. Saying they don’t need one due to Felton is like saying we don’t need one due to Blake or Jack… it’s the opinion of someone who doesn’t follow Charlotte closely. If you do follow the Bobcats, you know they are far from sold on Felton and that new coach Larry Brown absolutely fell in love with Augustin.

2nd, Charlotte, and any team for that matter, is smarter then to draft someone they absolutely don’t need just because “they MAY have a deal in place”. You either know you are going to get something (ie. OJ Mayo pick) or you pick for yourself. I find it really, really hard to believe that Charlotte picked DJ ‘thinking” that ””maybe”” Ptown would do a deal.

3rd, and most important, reading Mike B’s blog will tell you that KP made the statement going into the draft that “Indiana would select a PG”. He would never have said anything even remotely close to this if there was even the smallest possibility that Charlotte was the team picking for us. Think about it.

So, while it is fun to think that KP tossed up smokescreens, faked people out and then “Pritch-slapped” everyone, it is just not true. KP was prepared, he knew the 3rd (and final) of the 3 PG’s he wanted (Bayless, DJ and Westbrook) was going to be picked in the #12 slot… so he made a pre-draft deal with the #11 team, Indiana. That is smart, but not exactly “genius” and it is certainly not a “Pritch-slap” to Indy. If anyone got over in this deal, it was Indy – as they got the man they would have selected at #11 (Rush) AND they got to take on JJ1 with a Diogu/McRoberts swap as well. A no-brainer for Bird in Indy.

If anyone got “Pritch-slapped” it was Sactown. They should have seen this coming and had a better deal in place with Indy, or a different deal in place with the #10 team. Sactown was the ONLY loser in these trades (that is, if they really were going to select a PG, maybe that was a Bird rumor to get KP to give him JJ1?).

by ItsMrHarris2u on Jun 30, 2008 1:05 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Guess who has the highest PER for the Blazers? Hint, it isn't who you think.
Small
New B-Roy is the Old Kobe
The_dude_small
Stats 101: Whats The Deal? Let Me Explain...
Broyhope_small
First Rose Garden Game Redux...
Troll_stone_cropped_small
Nate in the land of the giants

Recent FanPosts

Screen_shot_2009-11-03_at_9
Looking to Consolidate the Blazers Talent? Well Guess Who has the Highest +/-? Also Blazers vs. Grizzlies Game Preview
Dsc_6704
"Per 48 Minutes" stats = Good news for Bayless
Copy_of_dcp_2180_small
09/10 junk
Meaccident_small
Most encouraging signs from the early season
Imported_photos_00004_small
Blazers Vs Timberwolves 10/8/09 Review
Small
How to consolidate?
Small
The Sched Ahead -- 11/09/09 Week Three, Primoris Annus Blazerium Dominatium
Small
Is Bynum the New Oden
Small
Brandon (old or new) is NOT Kobe (old or new) w/Poll
1-5-2009_007_small
NBA League Pass Blazer feeds???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

marty's buzzer beating dunk
Brandon Roy Wallpaper
Chad Ford (Insider): Travis Outlaw "Probably Won't Be Re-Signed"
Manu catches a bat during game. live coverage

ps
check out blair at the begining of video he freaks like a girl
Start Miller

Recent FanShots

Basketball Stats for Beginners...
So Bayless and T.I. are related right??
This chick will bring the toughness that the Blazers need to stop the other teams best players. Sign her KP!!!!
Rudy openly expresses disgruntlement
Charlie Rosen critiques the Blazers
McMillan said the key to having success on the road comes down to one...
NBA Top 10 From Last Night
I hope to see a LOT more of this during the season...nothing better than seeing Oden get block of the night.
Jaynes Weighs in on Blake / Miller / Roy
Viva la 3-Guard! T-Wolves Recap, at Loaded Orygun

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm