Podcasting Across the Universe
The pre-draft version of the Trailblazers.com podcast is up right here. We go through some of the rumors, some discussion of Devin Harris and T.J. Ford, the origin of the "Pritchslap", how tough Lamarcus is (especially when looking down on Casey's bald spot), plus Casey scores the point of the day with an analysis of how the (alleged) New Orleans-Portland #27 swap was publicized. Check it out, and don't forget we'll do another one Friday after the dust settles.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
45 comments
Comments
Hey Casey
If you read this, i just wanted to let you know that whatever y’all are using to encode these podcasts is not getting along well with iTunes (the OS X version at least). the total time listed is always wrong and when paused the podcast resumes at a point earlier than it was actually paused at, sometimes significantly earlier. not being able to pause it reliably is pretty inconvenient. the solution to this is hopefully easy—just change encoders. good luck, and thanks for the podcast.
Free Sergio! http://www.freesergio.com
by sergioFTW on Jun 25, 2008 3:09 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I second that.
It’s so annoying. Courtside podcasts do the same thing.
by bleedingblackandred on Jun 25, 2008 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
indeed they do
the solution i use is to just re-encode them in itunes. i use acc 96kpbs for voice and it only take about 2 minutes to re-encode an hour podcast. it resets the time markers properly, and pausing works, etc. it would just be nice if they came like that initially.
Free Sergio! http://www.freesergio.com
by sergioFTW on Jun 25, 2008 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the heads up
I use Cool Record Edit Pro, which is pretty standard, but maybe I could tweak the settings to fix the problem.
by Lance Uppercut on Jun 25, 2008 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yah
mp3 blade @ 96 kbs and 44100 sample rate is standard….don’t know if that’s what you’re using or not, but I run into the same problem these guys are.
"Beards--they grow on you"
by prezofdeath on Jun 25, 2008 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Me too
I think it’s racism or astigmatism.
"You boys sure found a way to make the time pass up there. Twist, you guys wasn't gettin' paid to leave the dogs babysittin' the sheep while you stem the rose." - Joe Aguirre from Brokeback Mountain
by tominhawaii on Jun 25, 2008 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My astigmatism is so bad that the optimalogist
stopped calling it “a-stigmatism” and started calling it “the-stigmatism”
GO says " Sir, you fornicated vertically…observe the consequences!
by 92wastheyear on Jun 25, 2008 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
dang it!!!
too much information… too much going on… work is NOT getting done!!!
I’m loving it! Thankfully it’s slow and I’ll just be coming into work early tomorrow.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Jun 25, 2008 3:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Work?!?
You mean you actually work? I thought everyone in here just sat at home on their computers all day.
yeah, my work is getting nowhere as well. what do you do (if that isn’t TMI)?
We don't NEED the draft. -Mortimer 6/18
by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Jun 25, 2008 11:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Project Manager
Summers are slow though, so at least that’s fortunate.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Jun 26, 2008 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dont kid yourselves
McBob DEFINATELY benefits from being Oden’s BFF. Not saying he is in the league because of it, but I bet it gives him a bit of leeway.
I remember the good old days. The Rasta Monsta days.
by GreatOden'sRaven on Jun 25, 2008 3:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Martell coments
Dave and I think the same about him in that if you put him on a team with touches, that guy will be going ballistic. He will be less than he can be if he stays with us. Sucks but I really think that’s true.
He’s going to be traded and he’ll explode and we’ll lament, but the reality is he’ll never be able to reach his potential with us.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Jun 25, 2008 3:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I find this interesting
I sort of agree with you about Martell not reaching his full potential with us. However, maybe it’s ok to think about the possability that him reaching his full potential isn’t that important. I’ll clarify. What if it’s more important for Martell to reach the potential the team needs, rather than his full potential as a player? He might not ever reach his full potential with us, but he will realize enough of it to be more than successful and have a fulfilling career.
Think of it this way (and I have no real stats to back up the following): I think most would agree that a player like Allen Iverson has reached his full potential as an NBA player. It might not be agreed that Robert Horry reached his full potential as a player (I think he probably didn’t). Who’s career is more successfull and who’s would you rather have?
Do we want Martell to be Robert Horry for us? Allen Iverson for someone else? Or, worse case scenario in my opinion, Robert Horry for someone else?
Martell has the potential to be a number two guy offensively for most teams in the NBA. And if he stays in Portland, he will almost certainly never reach that potential. But it might be more important to us, and maybe even him, if he doesn’t.
I hope this post makes sense. It’s doubtful that it does, but the idea of “reaching full potential” is interesting and Martell provides a good example for discussion.
by DrivetheLane on Jun 25, 2008 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its full potential
versus playing a role. I think its a pretty clear argument, and I would agree, except that for Martell, his full potential would be the best thing he could do for the Blazers. His full potential is being an efficient scorer from outside, and once he reaches that high level of efficiency, driving past defenders who would think their best bet as stopping him would be trying to block his shot. On the defense, he has got the speed and body to be one of the better defenders in the league if he figures it out. The SF is a very versatile position, and I think any way in which he makes his game better would be extremely helpful to the blazers.
Jaws were hitting the floor as Greg repeatedly attempted to tear the rim off the backboard...
by TheOdenator on Jun 25, 2008 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with what you say about any improvement helping the Blazers, but
I think I may have a different idea of his full potential. From what you describe it seems like you feel his full potential would be a guy like Shane Battier. I think he could be better than that because he is capable of that kind of defense but his offensive game is more diverse: Martell can hit the three (obviously) but if pressed and given the opporunity, I think he could create his own shot, drive and play above the rim, and hit mid-range pull up jumpers-Martell has shown flashes of all these. I would even say his offensive ceiling is higher than (dare I say it) Travis Outlaw, who is freaky athletic, but lacks the aggressiveness to drive. If pressed, I would maybe argue that if Martell was allowed to reach is full potential-given toches and the offense ran through him at times— I think, provided he works hard, he would be on the same as Carmelo Anthony with possibly better defense.
My above argument, however, is that I think he should be kept and allowed to be Shane Battier for us rather than us just feeling bad about him becoming Carmelo after we trade him. In re-reading ratbastird’s original post, what I’m discussing is his argument that it would suck if he is “less than he can be” with the Blazers. I don’t think that’s a bad thing, necessarily.
by DrivetheLane on Jun 25, 2008 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not convinced
that he can’t achieve that with the Blazers.
He’ll have his chances for his offensive explosions, and if he brings them often enough, you have to give him his touches. Even on a team with Roy/LMA/Oden. All of those guys will be happy to give up the ball to a guy when he starts to go off on a 24 point quarter.
Other people don't have as much practice at being wrong as I do -- HT, timbo
by jscot on Jun 26, 2008 1:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
First off people cheer for the jersey not the player.
Why would we of ever cheered for Rueben Patterson or JR Rider? So the lament will be short lived IMO.
Also in researching Martell even more, if you look at his stats they have remeined pretty much the same on a 36 minute basis. Add to that I hate it when he thinks he gets fouled or knocked down he sits there and pouts for a while before getting back on D.
I think that if we can hop up and grab Alexander and a PG in this draft I would be very happy. Let To and Jones take the bulk of teh SF mins until the Alexander is ready and then use a Blake/Rudy/ROy backcourt while Westbrook/Bayless are able to come into the rotation and then let Blake sign somewhere else, which sucks becauise I have said tha Blake will retire a Blazer, but like I said fans love the jersey not the player.
by SpyderRyder on Jun 25, 2008 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let me clarify.
I think WEbster is driven to be the best he can be. That’s understandable. I however believe that he thinks the best he can be is an individualistic goal. Myself, I want to win and I’ll do whatever it takes to do that. If I were in Websters shoes I’d WANT to stay on the blazers and help them win.
I suspect that that’s not what he wants.
That being the case I think we’ll trade him. When we trade him he’ll go to a team that he gets more touches and thus he suddenly explodes with scoring and defense. I suspect many of us will say “hey WE were pritchslapped!!!”
Webster has talent and could be our perfect SF, and yet his name still comes up in trades. Why do you think that is other than HE wants to leave? So we’ll trade to get the most we can, but if we can’t come away with a star player, we’ll be lamenting it.
For those who think WEbster isn’t our answer at SF, please remember that he’s young and many of you were calling for Outlaw’s head the year before he started breaking out.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Jun 25, 2008 5:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A few things
1. I feel that even though, Outlaw has been in the league longer, if you look at their minutes, TO has only outplayed Webster by about 600 minutes. When you factor in the fact that Webster was selected 6th as a player that could come in and make an immediate impact and TO was taken as a 26th pick project it it about even.
2. On a per 36 minute basis, Webster has not improved very much, if at all, while TO has improved almost every year.
3. With Websters contract situation coming up, he could jeapordize the cap space play with his cap hold, and he may want more than we are willing to give for him. OTOH Travis is signed to a very reasonable contract for what he is giving us.
So I think that Jack and Webster are gone, probably tomorrow, possibly with Raef to grab a vet or a pick. I just don;t see how Webster has improved and that he is a vital piece in our roster that cannot be filled by a draft pick or MLE type player.
by SpyderRyder on Jun 25, 2008 6:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't object to trading him
The only issue I see is that I don’t picture Outlaw as a starter.
I DO believe he’ll become a baller on another team. Nate hasn’t exactly been playing webster to his strengths. Rather he made webster fit in here, and I think that will help webster in the future but holds him back here.
We’ll see of course. I just think that people will complain when webster does well, and so I’m pointing out now that it’s for the best and most likely the reason why is because webster doesn’t want to fit the mold that nate is forming for him.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Jun 25, 2008 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whats with that title
It reminds me of the movie I never want to see
Across the Universe
man does that look awful
on the bright side I do enjoy your podcast
Maybe you could call it “We be all up in your ears.” yeah I like that
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jun 25, 2008 4:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
That's not the title of the podcast
just the heading of this silly little post.
—Dave
by Dave on Jun 25, 2008 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No worries
keep up the good work.
I always get excited when Dave responds to a post. Very gratifying even when the post makes me sound like a an idiot.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jun 25, 2008 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait til you're chastised
ooooh (shiver)
GO says " Sir, you fornicated vertically…observe the consequences!
by 92wastheyear on Jun 25, 2008 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I get that a lot
"You boys sure found a way to make the time pass up there. Twist, you guys wasn't gettin' paid to leave the dogs babysittin' the sheep while you stem the rose." - Joe Aguirre from Brokeback Mountain
by tominhawaii on Jun 25, 2008 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
no.
GO says " Sir, you fornicated vertically…observe the consequences!
by 92wastheyear on Jun 25, 2008 9:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
but you like it
you are like the Hawaiian version of Maggie Gyllenhall in Secretary.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jun 25, 2008 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not Quite
"You boys sure found a way to make the time pass up there. Twist, you guys wasn't gettin' paid to leave the dogs babysittin' the sheep while you stem the rose." - Joe Aguirre from Brokeback Mountain
by tominhawaii on Jun 25, 2008 9:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
James Jones?
Whats the word on whether or not James Jones opted out of his contract? He makes taking a Martell Webster or Travis Outlaw trade a lot more bearable.
by as11osu on Jun 25, 2008 5:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
i did a site archive search this morning
for “pritchslap” ... it’s amazing how far back the term goes on here haha
mcbob is definitely on the GO gravy train… let’s be real.
"Honor Terry Porter." Email me with your TP stories and memories.
by Ben. on Jun 25, 2008 5:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
At the very least
It’ll make KP think twice about trading Mcbob. And well, it’s just the way it is… I don’t mind keeping Oden happy.
There’s a line to be drawn with keeping a franchise player happy, and perhaps we’ll have to cross it someday, but keeping a relatively cheap flyer on Josh McRoberts, who happens to be one of if not THE best friend of Oden, doesn’t sound like that bad of a sacrifice to my appeasing ears.
Since it’s the 15th spot on the roster and doesn’t realy affect on-the-court play, I wouldn’t be upset if McBob is kept around just to give Oden backrubs n’ make sure his milk hasn’t spoiled in the fridge (mine just died, and I wish I had a McBob to check it and get me new milk :-( )
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jun 25, 2008 6:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the segue
I guess I’m gonna cry over spilt milk and say that I absolutely HATE this strategy of trading 2 or 3 of Webster, Outlaw, and Frye. We’ve discussed the pros and cons to death on this site, and I don’t have anything new to offer here. I’m just venting.
Notwithstanding my naive fan’s point of view about the situation (which is that I just LOVE these little Blazers to pieces), I really do believe that IF those guys want to be part of this team AND maybe settle for fewer minutes and less money than they’d maybe get elsewhere BUT get to wear a championship ring (or 2 or 3 or …) while hanging around with a great bunch of people THEN they should get that chance. I just KNOW we can win it all with Greg and the rest of these guys. BUT, if they want to leave, then that’s fine. I wish ‘em luck. Boo hoo hoo.
"Shoot, I don't even have anything to put in my own sig"
These are the modest words of pualo, posted on June 20, 2008.
Yes, pualo, an extraordinarily discerning BEdger with a knack for subtle expression.
by CatMan2 on Jun 25, 2008 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't wanna lose the kids either
I think Martell is gonna be a player, Frye has endeared himself to me by endearing himself to Portland, and I think Jack’s best days are ahead of him and his biggest negatives are fixed with experience.
Unfortunately, the contract and salary cap issues are very real and throw a big wrench in the ‘big plan’, and each guy is kinda at a crossroads in their career. If it is up to me, I keep Martell and try to sign him to a deal similar or a lil’ more than what a lottery rookie gets (or somewhat similar to Outlaw’s), and keep it short so if he breaks out he knows a big deal is coming very soon.
I love Jack, but I’m not sure what role he can have on this current Blazer team. Rudy takes his backup combo minutes, and Blake has been a better starter thus far. Perhaps Jack can overtake Blake (he has the talent), but that’ll take time to see… I don’t mind taking the time of course, but perhaps KP can make a deal now that can’t really wait. Who knows.
With both Frye and Martell, they are each so young and have 10 years or more ahead of them… settling for less money but more wins now isn’t what usually happens, no matter how nice of kids they are. I can’t begrudge them if Martell could only make MLE type money here, or 8-10+ million as a starter scoring 20ppg somewhere else. This is his livelihood, and he has a very short time frame to get what he can out of it.
And Frye has to realize he can’t do better than backup on the Blazers, and if you’re counting on injuries to give Frye playing time, that’s just not the way to think. He’s a luxury, and I’d love to keep him, but he’ll likely make more and be able to DO more on another team without two of the best post players.
Maybe being a Blazer is important to them, but I can’t count on it and I just can’t blame them if they want to go where they can play and make a SIZEABLE amount of more money. If it’s just the “make same salary but be in a bigger market because I am a tool” excuse, then I get annoyed. If it is Joe Johnson making a lil’ bit on the Suns and being a backup, or make MAX money and be the star for the Hawks, I can’t blame Joe Johnson for leaving.
Most of me just hates the idea of moving a youngin’ before we see what we got. I hear ya on the cry over spilled milk thang… this salary cap hold is a bee in my bonnet and is boogers on my toast!
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jun 25, 2008 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i want Frye to stay
I think if he has his choice, he will.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Jun 25, 2008 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fun going back and reading those
sooo much resistance to the zach trade. WE all knew Francis would be waived… right?
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Jun 25, 2008 6:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dave says Harris is overrated by Blazer fans
Watch for Harris to drop by 20% in future Bedge point guard polls.
by pualo on Jun 25, 2008 6:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
B'oh
I hadn’t listened to it yet. I’m a big Harris lover, and now I gotta defend him more since I wasn’t validated by Dave :-( GREAT, ALL I NEED.
If he’s talkin’ about Harris as a STAR or a CURE-ALL, well, I don’t think he’s a star. Just the bestest semi-available PG in the NBA, who also plays defense. I just like the cut of his jib and he looks like a modern Trail Blazer to my Harris loving eyes.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jun 25, 2008 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
he’s NOT a star, but he fits.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Jun 25, 2008 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Naw, you're good
For one thing Casey and Gavin were all up on him. I think he’s good, but most of the stuff I’ve seen in posts and such have him as REALLY FANTASTIC. I’m not sure I’m ready to go there yet, that’s all. Wouldn’t be sad to get him though.
—Dave
by Dave on Jun 25, 2008 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A role player PLUS is how I see him
Kinda like a Pippen in a PG body… does the lil’ things on defense, is versatile but not great at any one thing on offense, and smart. He has a better attitude than Pippen of course, and I ain’t saying DEVIN HARRIS = SCOTTIE PIPPEN, but that sort of ‘star role player’ who is a glue guy, but better…
A Teyshaun Prince of PGs, perhaps.
His speed and actually good defense (which seems so rare in good PGs these days), just makes me go googly for him. PLUS, I see him as semi-available for the right price, and since he seems attainable, he seems hotter to me. Chris Paul is much more sexy n’ beautiful, but I can’t pull that bird, mate! Harris won’t turn me down, so he gets my dander up, if you catch my drift.
And by ‘dander up’, I mean I want to marry him and make an honest man out of the kid.
I’m gonna listen to the podcast now, I love these.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Jun 25, 2008 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree with you
He’s an excellent starter that doesn’t need to dominate but can absolutely contribute and make the smart plays for you. He’s also been to the finals, and i love that even if he did lose. I’d prefer better shooting, but his defense is a definite plus as it takes defense to win in this league.
If it only costs me Webster, jack, and parts, I can give up on rose for this guy easily.
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Jun 25, 2008 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Devin Harris
He is light years ahead of where Augustin would be. Augustin is also incapable of playing any kind of defense out there. Anybody watch the tourney? Theres all the evidence you’ll ever need. Devin Harris on top of being a ridiculous defensive player, is a better slasher/finisher and catch and shoot guy. D.J. has slightly better vision, but Harris would be a perfect guy to be on the court with Brandon Roy. He’ll hit a high percentage of jump shots that Brandon is able to set up, as well as opening up things for others by driving the lane with force. Unlike Augustin, who is tiny in every regard, Harris is 6’4” and long. He’s able to stay in front of the elite Western Conference point guards. Augustin would get absolutely abused by the two up and coming PG’s (Paul/Williams/Parker/Ellis/Foye/Farmar etc).
If we can get Devin Harris for any kind of reasonable offer, you have to do it. Remember back in January, Kevin Pritchard himself went after Harris, and was willing to give up Outlaw, Jack and Frye. If Pritchard was willing to give that up then, and our window on adding elite veterans (especially PG’s) closing, we’ve got to go out there and get him. Harris is only 25, so he’s got the perfect window to maximize our Championship potential in the near future. It’d take Augustin 3-4 years to be a Championship caliber PG, and really not even then, would he be perfect, because of his lack of defense. Look at what Rondo did this year. Defense is just as important, and even more so, when you have a guy like Roy that is more than capable of running the offense late in games.
Think twice before you say no to Devin Harris. He’s the best option we’ll have at PG in the next 5 years. We’ve got to make it happen. We can afford to give up a little extra value to improve our starting 5. Thats what Championship teams do. If James Jones doesn’t opt out of his contract, it’d make acquiring Harris even more enticing.
by as11osu on Jun 25, 2008 7:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd definitely take Harris
but I’m shooting for Rose.
Harris is my second choice
Ford: Bill, you're claiming victory already? Have you had a "Mission Accomplished" banner printed yet?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2008/columns/story?page=DraftDebate-080624
by ratbastird on Jun 26, 2008 9:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
























