don’t trade #25 for a #4-5 pick in a ho-hum draft.

Imagine it like this: Pritchard is planning a trip with his staff to Seattle. But rather than just get into the car and drive - as most people would do - he instead plots out the alternate possibilities for flying, sailing, taking the train, bicycling and walking. Then he would start considering whether it would be best to stay in hotels, bed and breakfasts, or a friend’s home. And then he would consider where he would want to eat - restaurants, fast food, at home, etc. So rather than say, ‘I like this first option, so that’s what we’re going to do,’ he’s constantly stepping back and discussing it with his staff - “What combinations get us the best trip possible?”—and the decision isn’t made until the last minute, when all those companies want their business and are willing to reveal the true value they’re willing to give to make the deal work. But in the meantime the airline thinks Pritchard is working with them, the restaurant thinks his staff is eating with them, and the hotel thinks they’re staying with them. And if word were to leak out, you’d swear they were flying, eating out and crashing at the hotel. But in reality, they still exist only as possibilities. And when the deal is finally made, it’s not a knee-jerk reaction, but a methodically calculated plan that has built up over several weeks.

http://www.columbian.com/sports/blazerBanter/#entry3

Regardless of position or supposed “mock draft” status.
And if that player is shorter than 6 foot, ignore BE posters who have a problem with ‘short guards’.. their just jealous. :)

we should still go get bayless