OT -- fallout from the championship
Why is this off-topic? It has everything to do with the Blazers and the NBA. It is off-topic because it isn't about trading Travis or Martell or Channing or Jarrett, and it isn't about who we will draft at #13 (which probably won't happen), or about supposed trades with other people that almost certainly won't happen in the form being reported, or any of that stuff.
Maybe someone already basically said what I'm about to say, but if so, I missed it, because I was doing something unmentionable called w@rk (sorry for swearing, Dave). This is my own special weird Blazer fan perspective on the result of the Finals.
I'm GLAD, GLAD, GLAD that Boston won. Why, you will ask? Especially all of you who, like me, hate the Celtics.
Very important reason #1. K*be lost. This is always good.
Very important reason #2. The L@kers, after obviously having blackmailed whoever pretends to be a GM in Memphis, are the greatest medium-term threat to our dynasty. They actually have enough talent that, on a given night, they might even BEAT us. But there is one indisputable fact -- that team is unstable, and liable to implosion. What (WHO?) will make it implode? We all know. What is liable to trigger implosion? How about getting close enough to victory to be able to taste it, and then being blown out so badly that you know your team just isn't good enough? How about having such a huge ego that, if you know your team isn't good enough, it must be someone else's fault, not yours? The results of the Finals were a huge push towards the edge of the cliff for one particular individual. Not just the results, but the way it happened. This is GOOD, VERY GOOD.
Very important reason #3. I have been concerned about the future. Specifically, after we win the next 15 championships in a row, where is the motivation to go on? Might it all become old hat? Kind of like hoping someone would actually threaten Lance Armstrong in the Tour de France. But now, the Celtics have stepped up and helped in this. By winning their 17th championship, all that changed. Because, of course, we have one now, and 15 more will give us 16. So this result has virtually guaranteed motivation to continue winning for at least two more years after the next 15. By the time we hit 17 championships in a row, and 18 total, surpassing Boston, I'll be old and decrepit, and probably won't care so much. Thank you, Celtics, for giving me something to look forward to as I'm slipping into old age.
0 recs |
9
comments
Comments
Reason #1 and 2 are solid,
But as for reason #3…...DUH!!!!
Why don’t you just call the sky blue. ;)
My ignorance is my greatest weapon
by shenanigans on Jun 24, 2008 5:17 AM PDT 0 recs
Wishful thinking.
During K0be’s exit interview he said he’s happy with the team, and believes they will be much stronger when Bynum returns.
It could be smoke-blowing, or it could be how he really feels.
Now if Phil Jackson retires, there might be an implosion. Especially if they hire Doug Collins, Kurt Rambis, or Flip Saunders as coach.
Blazermania - It's not just for die-hards anymore.
by Blazerholic on Jun 24, 2008 6:09 AM PDT 0 recs
If Phil retires,
Kbe will opt out and head to the Eastern Conference. Cancer cured…kinda. They’d still be the Lkers and thus must be hated.
Hate is bad, kids. Unless you’re talking about the Lkers (or any former Lker…eyeballing you Rick Fox).
by Steve The Hedge on
Jun 24, 2008 11:02 AM PDT
up
0 recs
This is just the first step
in the K*be implosion. The next step is when we beat the L@kers in a tight game 7 next year to knock them out of the playoffs. The following year, we’ll win 70 games, and half way through the season His Egoness will blow, as he sees their window close….
Other people don't have as much practice at being wrong as I do -- HT, timbo
by jscot on
Jun 24, 2008 2:15 PM PDT
up
0 recs
#4
By making giant trades for aging stars, Boston managed to win a championship, and set an example for the rest of the NBA to follow for the next ten years. Nevermind how well that worked out for Dallas and Phoenix, or for that matter (although less so) the L[xxx]rs. This approach has been tried for years, with the percentage of success being ridiculously low. But just like a gambling habit, one win validates all the times the method has lost.
With the Blazers using a long-term strategy, others teams in the NBA have little-to-no chance of winning for a long time. And when they finally figure out how it is done and manage to emulate it, it will take so long to catch up, that Portland will still keep winning.
One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season
Chaplain of the Jarrett Jack Fan Club
"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus
by T Darkstar on Jun 24, 2008 6:19 AM PDT 0 recs
It will be fun...
When, over the next 5 years or so, we have some great battles with the Lakers, and when we win, no one wil ever spend more than 5 seconds talking about the blazers, but will spend hours and hours talking about how Kbe can’t win it all.
If they did win it, then when the Blazers beat them, it will be all about the Blazers, taking down the Lakers and Kbe. If Kbe doesn’t win it all, then no one will even know the Blazers won, just that Kbe still couldn’t do it.
Which is how I found myself obsessively rooting for the Lakers to win this year.
by TimG on Jun 24, 2008 10:17 AM PDT 0 recs
Yeah
Use @ instead. It makes things into email addresses.
Other people don't have as much practice at being wrong as I do -- HT, timbo
by jscot on
Jun 24, 2008 10:53 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I am going to weigh in like a jerk
as the only sport I am as passionate about as basketball is professional cycling.
Lance only beat Zulle in 99’ due to an early crash by Zulle and he was almost beat in 03’ by an out of shape Jan Ulrich.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Jun 24, 2008 6:22 PM PDT 0 recs










