Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Lance Berkman Could Have Torn ACL

The Official Blazersedge Joe Alexander Thread

He was the Blazers' pick in our Blazersedge Mock Draft.  He filled the 13 spot in many a mock draft as well, though lately his stock seems to be rising.  He is Joe Alexander from WVU.  This is his thread.

Today is the day to dissect, concoct, and otherwise pore over this issue with a magnifying glass and fine-toothed comb.  Do you like him?  Do you want him?  Do you see the Blazers wanting him and if so what kind of role and timetable do you foresee?  Does he fit with this franchise and its needs right now?

Fire away below.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 83 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Dave

I care not for your silly Joe Alexander – who sounds too much like a founding father to be a good basketball player. I wish only to commend the two Blazer fans at the Finals game tonight representing Portland, and I don’t want to spend 75 words doing it. Ta to the Ta.

by begottenson on Jun 16, 2008 12:54 AM PDT reply actions  

I saw those too

Big props to them for wearing those jerseys to a hostile environment (although probably not as hostile as to C’s fans).

by royroty on Jun 16, 2008 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

I once wore

a U of O hat to a football game (Cal – Washington) in Seattle. I got yelled at ALOT.

by begottenson on Jun 16, 2008 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Laker fans, ain't so tough.

I go to all the Blazer games at Staples fully decked in Blazer gear and I’ve never had a problem. I even heckle and cheer just as if I were at the Rose Garden. My Laker-heckle is “Pass it to Kobe! Pass it to Kobe! Shoot it, Kobe! Shoot it! No! Pass it back to Kobe!”

They hate that.

by Jumbo on Jun 16, 2008 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

YouTube footage?

Or any such . . . I want a look at those two.
They’re mah hee-rowuhs for the day.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 16, 2008 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Never mind.

There’s a pic in the thread for “Wearing Visiting Team’s Jersey to Game”.
That was good enough for me.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 16, 2008 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think I saw on the news that he works out for the Blazers on Wed.

All I know about him is that he is a white Outlaw. Which sucks for him, because black Outlaw already has the Outlaw position filled.

by Sabonis4Ever on Jun 16, 2008 1:00 AM PDT reply actions  

Why bring race

Into the picture? Is this not about what Our Team, the Portland Trailblazers might do in the upcoming draft? Which is it that you do not like? The fact that he is white and my be able to bring the same skills that our #25 does (which I think are considerable!!!) or the fact that he is not black? Enough of this kind of BS. BPA has nothing to do with skin color. Has everything to do with the game of Basketball.

by coastrider on Jun 16, 2008 1:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

OK dude just chill as of right now 50% of

the posts here are you going off, if you are having a bad day I am sorry, but we need to keep it chill here, thats why we all come here.

Ya cool daddio?

I belive what Sabonis was saying is that there is only room for one Outlaw on the Blazers roster and that position is already filled.

by SpyderRyder on Jun 16, 2008 1:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Bring race into it! Yeah!

No…. I don’t care really, listen to SpyderRyder and bury your feelings deep down, Luke. They do you credit, but they could be made to serve the Emperor.

Sabonis4Ever was making a joke, you should try not to get this angry this early in the morning.

by begottenson on Jun 16, 2008 2:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

The relevant quote is:

“Well, to tell a family secret . . . My grandmother was Dutch.”

(Link rated MB for “Mel Brooks”, and you know what THAT means: Very extremely NSFW.)

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 16, 2008 6:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

RACE WAR RACE WAR RACE WAR!

Since all I know about Joe Alexander is that he is very athletic and has only played basketball for 5 years, part of me wonders if he is overvalued because he is extremely unique: a white guy seemingly as athletic as a really athletic black kid.

Because this is an oddity, a rarity, perhaps it makes him stand out more than it would if he were an ordinary black college player? I mean, still a high draft choice and all, but perhaps the whiteness makes him seem more ‘special’ and draftable?

Just wondering, because I don’t really know much about the kid. Can he shoot? He’s got good size and can jump.

Does he got BBIQ? Is he a tournament wonder only? (that’s another thing I have heard)

I am very interested in learning more about this Joe Alexander, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 16, 2008 3:09 AM PDT reply actions  

I heard he's a gym rat

I don’t understand how being called a rat is a good thing though.

"lowest common denominator - every time I think you hit rock bottom you sink it deeper into the shale" -- bow4meow

by tominhawaii on Jun 16, 2008 3:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

But does he give 110%?

And/or bring his “A” game?

Will he go through a wall to win?

Is he the first one to arrive last to leave?

Tim Donaghy was a rat and worked in a gym, so I also don’t see how being a ‘gym rat’ is a good thing. That sounds really dirty and gross, and a clean culture is important to the Blazer franchise and fanbase currently.

If we draft Alexander, we got kinda a minutes crunch at SF, so we might as well microfracture one of his knees so he can hold off a year while we figure out our rotation further. Micro will become the new ‘leave ‘em in Europe’ once it is seen as the best thing to ever happen to Greg Oden.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 16, 2008 4:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm more concerned with his DNA injecting ability

The last Courtside was saying Oden’s microfracture might be the best thing to ever happen to him.

Oh, there have been times when times were hard
But always somehow I made it, I made it through
‘Cause for every moment that I’ve spent hurting
There was a moment that I spent, ah, just loving you

"lowest common denominator - every time I think you hit rock bottom you sink it deeper into the shale" -- bow4meow

by tominhawaii on Jun 16, 2008 4:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh Snap

I went off topic. I think Alexander has a tremendous upside and will look cute next to Sergio and McRoberts at the end of the bench.

"lowest common denominator - every time I think you hit rock bottom you sink it deeper into the shale" -- bow4meow

by tominhawaii on Jun 16, 2008 4:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

The first mention of "gym rat"

that I remember was in reference to Danny Ainge. Unfortunately I cannot think of a single clever comment to add.

by jorga on Jun 16, 2008 3:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Luke Ridnour is one too

Rasheed was never a gym rat. I don’t know my point thought.

Thanks for pointing that out. I think “gym rat” is the only good “rat.” I wonder if mobsters ever killed a guy for being a rat. Then later found out that he just liked playing basketball.

"lowest common denominator - every time I think you hit rock bottom you sink it deeper into the shale" -- bow4meow

by tominhawaii on Jun 17, 2008 4:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Rats, a garage punk band from Portland, Oregon ;-)

And a lot of people born under the Chinese zodiac sign “rat/year of the rat” (鼠) would argue that they are “good rats”.

Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...

by Norsktroll on Jun 17, 2008 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh Yeah

I think I’m a year of the rat. 1972 but not gonna google it. Not gonna do it.

"lowest common denominator - every time I think you hit rock bottom you sink it deeper into the shale" -- bow4meow

by tominhawaii on Jun 17, 2008 8:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I saw him in a game against marquette

I was actually impressed with him because of his 3-pt shot, which he hit pretty well. The thing is, he had a lot of good shooters in wvu, which helped him out with spreading the floor. But from what I remember, I was most impressed with his ability to shoot the rock, which apparently is his biggest weakness? Odd.

by premthegrem on Jun 16, 2008 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

well...

he said he wanted to model his game after Matt Harpring. That sounds like a good fit on the Blazers in my book, especially if he can add some dirty toughness to this roster.

by The Graduate on Jun 17, 2008 5:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I like him

and I think he’s the one I want us tou draft but… He’s playing SF, right ?
We already have Outlaw, Jones, Webster or even maybe Roy or Fernandez who can play that position…
I’ve always been the kind of guy who likes a very deep bench, big rotations, but I start to think that we’ve been stockpiling talent too much and will therefore have to let some go for very little in return….

by Blenzer on Jun 16, 2008 5:55 AM PDT reply actions  

want usTO draft but

by Blenzer on Jun 16, 2008 5:59 AM PDT reply actions  

Joe Alexander

Alexander recorded the second fastest sprint in the pre-draft combine, and was second on weights in this one. Further, he ranked high in the standing jump (As I recall, it was in the top 4 or 5). Sorry to disagree with some of you, but he is not another Outlaw. He has a well earned rep for hard work – indeed the trainers repeatedly stated this fact. He simply outworks most other players – if not all of them. He, in sum, has a motor. And you can’t teach motors or desire – you have it or you don’t. Mentally, as such, he’s superior to a lot of NBA players. Having said this, you can also point out that this won’t necessarily make him better than Outlaw, but his work ethic guarantees that if he can be better, he will be. This is why a lot of GM’s are looking hard at him. Every year, you get all the hype about all the wonderful athleticism of everyone drafted, and then 1/2 of them disappear. If you assume that they were 1/2 the athletes the hype promotes, they shouldn’t. It comes down to desire. One of my favorite stories came from Magic on Bird. The night before a playoff, Magic and several lakers wandered down to look at the arena they were going to play in the next day. It was after 8 pm. As they walked into the arena, they heard the familiar sound of a basketball. And they then stood silently in the stands and watched Bird. He had several racks of basketballs, and was shooting them, alone – over and over again. Magic and the lakers, soberly left, and Magic was thinking – “man, doesn’t he every quit”? They knew he was a warrior. Everyone else was where-ever they were – but not Bird. He never had the athleticism of a lot of players, but he had that motor. And it made him a perennial all-star. Joe may not be the guy KP wants – but you know one thing about Joe’s history – he’ll give you 100% every night, and he’ll work 12 months a year to be better. And there are worse things.

by Eben Calder on Jun 16, 2008 6:32 AM PDT reply actions  

Is he the right guy?

OK, I have seen the highlights and we all know that he is a talented kid. Looking at what he would bring, I think he would be a solid addition to the second unit. I think the he is versatile enough to play the 3 and 4 and that will come in handy when Portland is forced to play small ball. For some reason, I see him more in the mold of a Stephen Jackson (without the ‘tude) than a Travis Outlaw.

But, is he the right guy? I think that, barring any big trades or big draft surprises (Westbrook or Augustine falling), Alexander would be a pretty good fit. I like the fact that he can shoot from outside and that he willingly made a position change to make his team better. That type of maturity will be needed when he is riding the Pine or playing in Idaho next year.

by da34shadow on Jun 16, 2008 7:47 AM PDT reply actions  

Stop making this about race!

Someone already said Alexander is… oh, you asked if he’s the RIGHT guy… never mind.

"I don't trust lawyers." --David Stern

by MiledAnimal on Jun 16, 2008 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Joe Alexander

seems like an interesting prospect, lots of athleticism and a great motor, long wingspan and…oh hell, I can’t even pretend to get it up.

There is essentially no chance of us taking Alexander at 13. We have a minute and youth crunch on the wing as it is, and all indications are that Alexander as a prospect and his style of play both strongly resemble Outlaw. The only way I can see us taking him is if we trade Frye, moving Outlaw to full-time backup PF and letting he and Alexander split time at SF, or if we trade Martell and make Outlaw the starting SF…

...but those deals aren’t happening in a vacuum. I’d be shocked if any draft-day deal were consummated that didn’t involve our pick at #13, either moving up or moving out. If we do either, we aren’t taking Alexander. I’ll be shocked if he ever wears a Blazers uniform.

by BlazersOrBust on Jun 16, 2008 8:07 AM PDT reply actions  

Probably right

If Webster or Outlaw is traded, the 13th pick is probably included. If they aren’t traded, then the Blazers have too many SFs… I don’t know if I’d be shocked if he ever wears a Blazer uniform, but it doesn’t seem likely.

by PoliSam on Jun 16, 2008 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

BPA

I think that too-many SF argument does not hold water. If Alexander is BPA, they take him and worry about the log-jam later.

by da34shadow on Jun 16, 2008 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Absolutely agree.

Even if a SG fell to us, we really should pick him up.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

Chaplain of the Jarrett Jack Fan Club

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on Jun 16, 2008 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just because the Blazers pick him...

Doesn’t mean he’ll end up in a Blazers uniform. Although Pritchard is a believer in the BPA, he’s also a believer in going after a player that he likes, regardless of where the player sits in the draft. In order for Alexander to end up in a blazer uniform, Alexander has to fall to the 13th pick (since it doesn’t make sense to trade up for Alexander), Pritchard has to be unable to move up in the draft, unable to trade the pick for a veteran, AND unable to trade Alexander after the fact. The chances of all of those things happening seems pretty low to me. In fact, I’d take a bet if it were offered.

by PoliSam on Jun 16, 2008 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmmm.

Maybe Joe Alexander is the case for a trade involving MarWeb or Trout that DOESN’T involve the #13 pick.

A MarWeb + JJ trade makes sense if the #13 is not included, and we pick Joe Alexander.
He’s so Trout, and Trout is so ready to start, he’d be an ideal backup (moreso than MarWeb would be) if we started Trout.

Still begs the question of what we’d get in return for JJ and MarWeb.
But considering both their rookie contracts end after next season, they’re appealing to teams
that are looking for cheap young prospects OR cap space to clear (about $7 mil combined between the two).

And we’d have a game 1 starting line-up of Blake/Roy/Trout/LMA/Oden, with a backup unit
of Sergio/Rudy/Alexander/Frye/Przy, plus what we get for JJ+MarWeb somewhere in there.
That’s not a bad way to go.

Hmmmmmm . . .

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 16, 2008 6:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

OR, of course . . .

. . . we could just pick Joe Alexander and plan to say byesies to JJ and MarWeb at season’s end,
and pocket the cap space on top of REC – go with the lineups mentioned above, and just shed payroll.

Ditch the JJ and MarWeb contracts at season’s end, and add a very affordable Joe Alexander right now.
$7mil gone, about $2mil in (rough estimate of the salary for a #13 pick, sources sketchy but existant),
and no real change in the roster, for better OR worse (no improvement, just substitution at a cheaper rate,
like the Grizzlies dumping a $7mil Gasol for a $2mil Gasol that’s just as good).

It’s a thought.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 16, 2008 6:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Joe Alexander

I posted these links before, but if we are going to be discussing Joe Alexander, we really ought to check out some of the youtube videos, since they are fairly extensive:

Highlights from Big East tournament:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YkitJ5-wuQ

Long Highlights:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdAYyqSOuPc&feature=related

The comparison to Travis Outlaw is reasonable, since he’s athletic, has limited ball-handling skills, and has a decent pull-up jumper, but not great range. He’s not a pure shooting SF like Martell and Jones or a slashing, play-making SF like Paul Pierce or McGrady or Luke Walton… It is a legitimate worry that he replicates what Outlaw provides and it wouldn’t really make sense to carrying Webster, Jones, Outlaw, and Alexander. On the other hand, it seems likely that either Webster or Outlaw will be traded and it wouldn’t be terrible to have both Outlaw and Alexander on the roster.

One thing that has not being mentioned about Alexander is that he could fill in at PF reasonably well, probably better than Outlaw in many ways. He played PF for West Virginia and tested as one of the strongest guys at the NBA combine. More importantly, if you watch his highlights, he scored off a lot of post-ups in college and clearly likes to mix it up in the paint. Watching the NBA finals has convinced me that it is really nice to have players that can guard a couple of positions and I think Alexander definitely could defend both SFs and PFs, though he probably wouldn’t be an elite defender against either in the forseeable future… You wouldn’t want Alexander guarding Elton Brand or Tim Duncan all night, but he could fill in at PF when other teams go small or play their back-up PFs.

by PoliSam on Jun 16, 2008 8:10 AM PDT reply actions  

I like your comment

but I just cracked up at your list of slashing, playmaking SFs. Pierce, McGrady, and….Luke Walton. That’s roughly akin to, “Scarlett Johansson is a beautiful up-and-comer, much like Adrianna Lima, Jessica Alba, or the kinda cute girl who scans my groceries at the local Costco.” :D Who knew that Bill posted on BlazersEdge?

by BlazersOrBust on Jun 16, 2008 8:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Replace "Luke Walton"

with LeBron James and it makes more sense

by royroty on Jun 16, 2008 8:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I chuckled as well when I read Walton’s name…
Then i thought that maybe I hadn’t seen the right Walton’s games and couldn’t judge him…

by Blenzer on Jun 16, 2008 8:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah!

So true! I initially had Lebron in place Walton, but then I thought to myself “By slashing, play-making SF, I don’t just mean really, really good SF. Hmm, who is a less talented SF that is a decent passer… not pure shooter or athlete… Luke Walton!” Of course, Luke doesn’t do a lot of slashing.

by PoliSam on Jun 16, 2008 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

trouble with youtube

They exclusively show made baskets. Everyone on youtube shoots %100. It’s hard to evaluate.

You know what I’d lke to see. Some assists. He dishes 2.4 a game. That’s decent.

by cantdunk on Jun 16, 2008 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

alexander has game

i saw this guy in person at the dc regional game against arizona and he really stood out. the guy has serious skills and would be a great addition to any team.

by UVAduck on Jun 16, 2008 8:11 AM PDT reply actions  

alexander is great if he is the best player available at 13

It looks like he might be the blazers pick if we keep it. I think if alexander is selected it keeps a bunch of trade options open for after the pick is selected. Great athleticism, he’s a good scorer, but it seems like he might push for minutes at a position that we don’t have many minutes to spare. Martell and Travis should get 90% of the minutes at the sf position and Jones will get some too. There doesn’t appear to be a place for alexander in the rotation.

The upside is that he would be a good trading piece, and that he can develop his game without any pressure to carry an offense. If he has the drive to work at his game without getting the attention a #13 pick usually has, he could have a very good career in the NBA. If he lacks work ethic, he could drift into obscurity.

THE Poobah of Prognostication

by CBASS on Jun 16, 2008 8:33 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm comfortable with Alexander at 13

if Blazers’ brass thinks that’s the right pick. I figure we need perimeter defense the most in a pick, so either a point guard or SF pick (made properly) could provide that. A sf will help with rebounding, a pg will help with fast breaking and running plays. I worry a bit about Webster and Outlaw though. Will they continue to improve if they get challenged for minutes by a player like this?

by ranma on Jun 16, 2008 9:21 AM PDT reply actions  

agreed on perimeter D

According to collegehoops.net, his weakness is getting beat off the dribble. I’m not familiar with him as a player, but if that’s his biggest weakness, I’d say we can do better.

by the vegetarian on Jun 16, 2008 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Speculation

This is a tough one. I don’t see the PG of the future in this draft or on the trading block right now. I keep thinking KP may have to wait until next year, and use the $30 million in cap then, along with some of these pieces to get a PG. This could leave us at #13 and someone like Alexander. After all, we don’t need another SG with Fernandez coming in, and we certainly don’t need a PF or a center. Yet, we have to clear some roster space for these players to keep getting the minutes they need to improve. One option, of course, would be to strategize Alexander as the #2 SF for now, much as some think Fernandez will be the #3 or #4 guard. Then, we might see KP move several players from the Frye/Webster/Outlaw/Jack/Rodriguez group for an expected mid round #1 next year, and possibly the 3 #’2’s for similar spots or a low #1. Then, he could use the picks and cap space next year for a PG. If nothing else, I can appreciate the headaches KP has right now.

by Eben Calder on Jun 16, 2008 9:27 AM PDT reply actions  

I have serious reservations

and not because he can leap out of the gym, or that he’s a rat that lives in the gym, but c’mon people, HE HAS A SOUL PATCH!!! No good can come of that, next thing you know he’ll be sporting a puka shell necklace, retroactively joining a frat, and spending all of his free time at the ohm or Berbati’s Pan.

by nikolokolus on Jun 16, 2008 10:13 AM PDT reply actions  

Alexander simply a work out warrior?

I can’t help but think this Joe Alexander dude is nothing more than a solid college baller who has the “Work-out Warrior” skills to turn heads at a combine. Yes, he played well in the tourney and his Junior season. Before that, I never saw this guy on draft boards… let alone lottery discussions. SO, I am very skeptical. But I don’t think he will be best player available when the Blazers draft at #13: DeAndre Jordan, Kevin Love, Brandon Rush, DJ Augustin, Donte Greene, Nick Batum… all BPA over Alexander.

In the BlazersEdge.com Mock Draft, Joe Alexander was available at 13, but so was DeAndre Jordan and Brandon Rush. Both of these prospects I see with much more NBA upside and trade leverage than Joe Alexander. Especially if Jordan is available. I also believe that bundling our picks for this draft will entice another to move down 1,2,3,4 or 5 slots. That isn’t too far of a move, especially if the player a certain team wants is likely to still be on the board at #13. For example, in these mock drafts where Alexander is going at #8? Why not trade back with Portland, pick up a few more picks and still get the guy you want at #13. Then Portland has a REAL chance at adding one of the exciting guard prospects from this class, which shouldn’t be underestimated. I feel this guard class is going to be very memorable. Portland has the leverage to move up a few slots and get a guard.

Other Mock Drafts as of Monday June, 16:

www.nbadraft.net
Joe Alexander drafted #8 overall by milwaukie.
Portland drafts DJ Augustin at #13

www.espn.com
Portland takes Joe Alexander at #13
Still on the board is Brandon Rush and DJ Augustin went @#12 one slot ahead of us?

www.realgm.com
Portland takes Joe Alexander at #13 again,
Too bad Kevin Love is still on the board here, goes to PHX at #15? We’d take Love at 13 right? Brandon Rush here slips into the 20s… I’d rather have both over Alexander.

www.draftexpress.com
Portland takes center DeAndre Jordan at #13. Alexander had gone #8 to MIL in this mock again, still on the board for Portland besides Jordan are B.Rush & Donte Greene.

www.mynbadraft.com
THIS MOCK IS CRAZY: #11 DJ Augustin goes to Indiana, #12 Russell Westbrook goes to Sacramento, and at #13 Portland is hosed with Alexander again? Over my dead body! If KP can’t bundle our picks to move up to #10 where the Nets draft. They are looking for a big man and working on the LeBron sweepstakes, how could they not want a few early 2nd round picks to start filling their international prospect pipeline?

KP has what he needs to maneuver. Portland will come out on top in this draft.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 16, 2008 10:31 AM PDT reply actions  

That last one is filthy.

No WAY does Westbrook slide that low, especially with Augustin also sliding.
5-6-8-9-10 = Love-Randolph-Gallinari-Brook-Jordan?
That mocker really overvalues height. Idiot.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 16, 2008 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

alexander’s workouts have been too impressive and it doesnt look like we will even get a chance at him…draft stock climbing way too fast. Im thinking a top 10 pick now

by danevan on Jun 16, 2008 11:19 AM PDT reply actions  

Good...

then hopefully with any luck Portland won’t have to trade up at all if Augustin or Westbrook fall to 13. It is not too far of a longshot for one of them to fall. I hope other non-guard players start to have their “draft-stock” skyrocket so that KP may have the opportunity to pick between two or three of the top guards at thier current spot, but that is highly unlikely.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 16, 2008 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Small point guards...

Scare me to death. Sure, Augustin is skilled, but the Blazers need to be picky about their point guard. They need perimeter defense and he can’t offer that like Westbrook can.

Having said that, Westbrook won’t be there at 13. A trade with the Clippers or Bucks could be possible… We need someone who is a great competitor, hard worker, and high-ceiling type player who has the potential to team with Roy for the next ten-fifteen years. Westbrook is that guy.

Alexander is a workout warrior who projects to be another Travis Outlaw. Martell is our SF of the future, so why would we pick a duplicate of the sixth man we already have?

In KP I trust.

by bleedingblackandred on Jun 16, 2008 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Stoudamire won rookie of the year....

And he was a pretty effective guard if he wasn’t playing stoned or getting benched for temper-tantrums.

DJ Augustin height/build = Damon Stoudamire height/build
DJ Augustin talent/skills = Damon Stoudamire talent/skills
DJ Augustin attitude/intangibles > Damon Stoudamire attitude/intangibles
therefore
DJ Augustin potential > Damon Stoudamire’s actual career in the NBA.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 17, 2008 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

I do agree with you in that Augustin probably has a higher ceiling than Damon because of those intangibles. However, I remember just being annoyed when Damon played for the Blazers because of his size. If Augustin is going to play for Portland, he’s going to have to convince KP and the crew that he can guard bigger PGs. Damon just got shot over night in and night out, which was so frustrating to watch.

Trade Freeland!

by rockingharder on Jun 17, 2008 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep.

NBADraft.net has him at 8 now. Westbrook dropped from 8 back down to 11.

Trade Freeland!

by rockingharder on Jun 16, 2008 5:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Possible trade

I think Joe Alexander will be drafted before #13. I think Portland should trade their three second round picks to Orlando for pick #22. Then since I have heard that one of the picks #14 through #16 is available for purchase we should purchase it. Then we should package picks #13, #15, and #22 and trade for pick #1 or #2. Maybe we could get Derrick Rose. What do you think? This also would not disrupt the current players.

by dkhaines on Jun 16, 2008 11:27 AM PDT reply actions  

lol.

No way that’s happening.

13,15,22 could get us the 5th pick or so though. But no way a GM trades a franchise caliber player, Rose, for a late lotto pick, the 15th, and the 22nd pick.

Boston coach Doc Rivers said he was surprised by the firing of Saunders.
"I don't understand it," Rivers said. "It makes coaching not fun."

by Dheepan on Jun 16, 2008 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

You could be right about Alexander moving up the board. But then, there’s so much moving around in this draft that you really have to wonder. Serge Ibaka, the unknown 18 year old from the Congo jerked a few heads recently at the Euro Camp. He was sitting in the low 20’s on some drafts, then started moving up. If you wanted to draft and leave someone in Europe – you could certainly look at this one. Lopez has been projected from 3 to 11, Mayo from 2 to 5 or 6. Six guards, Rose, Mayo, Bayless, Gordon, Augustin and Westbrook have been projected into the top 10 or 12. Gallinari moves up, and then down. Love seems to be a concensus now before 13, as is Augustin and Westbrook. Alexander is moving around too. KP had it right in the beginning. He said there was a lot of fluidity between 5 and 20. Rush. Batum and Greene don’t seem compelling picks right now given who we already have. And frankly, I’m not that sold on all the guards. There’s a lot of hype, and most are19 years old. They have upside, a lot of risk, and it will take 4-5 years to make them into the PG we want – if you want to wait that long. And I don’t see any other than Rose and Augustin that are a lock at PG. Most just keep repeating the mandtra that “they maybe could be if”. Personally, I think KP wants a vet – not another rookie. Like some, I think he’s setting up that scenerio, regardless of who we draft – or don’t draft.

by Eben Calder on Jun 16, 2008 12:34 PM PDT reply actions  

KP said he is looking at young guards...

Check this link:

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/features/rumors?univLogin02=stateChanged

Contents:
Will Blazers Draft A PG? (posted ESPN.com 6/13/08)
Two weeks from draft day, speculation is that the Blazers will most likely acquire help at point guard through a trade or free agency. But after Thursday’s workout, GM Kevin Pritchard said he wouldn’t hesitate to add a point guard in the June 26 draft, even if that prolongs the Blazers’ rebuilding.
“If the guy is going to be a good player, he’s going to be a good player,” he said. “Developing is hard. We’ve gone through a lot of developing, but I think now that we’ve got Brandon (Roy) and LaMarcus (Aldridge) kind of taking it to another level, they can become that solidifying force in the locker room.

“Rookie point guards in this league tend to struggle. Even the guys who have had huge success, the Chris Pauls and Deron Williams … had to go through some bumps and bruises. The guys we’re looking at may take some time.”—The Oregonian”

From the sounds of this, KP is not against getting a rookie over a vet AND KP has a grasp of reality as he understands that all his components aren’t ready and won’t be for a year or three and that KP has the leadership he needs on the team with Roy, Aldridge and Coach Nate. Roy is already an All-Star. He is respected as much as vet-journeymen. Plus, if the Blazers Draft a rookie PG, Portland doesn’t have to trade away any of their assets. Which gives some players like Webster, Outlaw, Jack and Frye to show their improvements and how they ultimately can or do fit on this team.

Many have posted that keeping these players on the roster past this off-season will damage their trade value if we get into this next season as their value will drop with less available playing time. Maybe so, but that may only be a liklihood and it is not set in stone. Some players, noteably Jarrett Jack, could heavily increase his trade value if the minutes he gets he continues to play aggressive on both sides of the ball but shows improved efficiency with the ball in less turnovers, more made field goals, and tighter perimeter defense. All of which I beleive are very attainable for Jack. But if he improves his game enough to improve his value would you decide to keep him? I definitely would.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 16, 2008 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Very well said.

I like that comment.

[ clapping sounds ]

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 16, 2008 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Really

Then why didn’t you recommend it? I did. Each time you don’t recommend a comment, an angel becomes an angle.

"lowest common denominator - every time I think you hit rock bottom you sink it deeper into the shale" -- bow4meow

by tominhawaii on Jun 17, 2008 5:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

To the angels: I am sorry.

Before TIH let me know of the damage that can occur when I do not properly rec a post.

So, to all the angels that i have screwed over by changing you to an angle… My Bad.

I hope that counts for something.

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 17, 2008 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

It's not just Jarrett's defense on the perimeter that needs help

It’s Jarrett’s foot on the perimeter, too.

"I don't trust lawyers." --David Stern

by MiledAnimal on Jun 18, 2008 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

joe a.

he won’t get past milwaukee at no. 8

i watched alexander a lot during the year and he became one of my favorite players because he did stuff on the court that was unbelievable…he jumps like he’s on a pogo stick – straight up, seemingly effortlessly…his shot is unblockable, he has a beautiful midrange bank shot…there are other parts of his game that he flashes not as frequently, but when he does, the whole package is breathtaking – i saw the picture perfect 3, the no look pass into the post for an easy layup, ridiculous weakside shotblocking, gorgeous spinmove for layup…he’s got it all, if he puts it together
two more things…he was by far the best athlete tested in orlando 6’8” or taller (probably the best overall, which is almost impossible for a guy his size) and is like the 3rd or 4th fastest guy ever tested there (again, ridiculous at 6’8” 220)
of all the top prospects this year, he is the only player to average 2.5 assists and 1.5 blocks…oh, he shoots 80% from the free throw line and i never saw him argue with a ref all year

by rocksoulpop on Jun 16, 2008 4:02 PM PDT reply actions  

agree, Bucks have attention on alexander

Bucks need a SF (D. Mason and B. Simmons), but it’s still our responsibility to do our scouting of Alexander if he should fall to #13.

Good description of Joe’s attributes as well.

by PETRO KID on Jun 16, 2008 6:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that depends on what they have in mind for Yi.

If they keep him (and the Clippers-love-Yi buzz is too solid to ignore),
they gotta be thinking about moving him to small forward, and starting him;
if so, then it’s a power forward they need, to make that switch doable.
Yi’s been a bad combo of bench and PF for his rookie season, and they can’t keep that weak stuff up
for a #6 pick that, at the time they used it on him, they seemed SO high on him.

They need to start him, and it’s gotta be at the three.
Drafting a true power forward this year is the best way to achieve that.
If I were mocking this draft, I’d have the Bucks taking the BPA from among KLUV, Jordan and Randolph.
A front line of Yi/8th-pick-PF/Bogut would be much better than the Yi-Bogut “big man” combo of last year.

Of course, Yi-to-Clips makes that whole approach totally useless, as would the allegedly impending Michael Redd dumping.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 16, 2008 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

What about the Yi to Golden State for #14 & Brandon Wright?

I have read rumors of Golden State still working to target last years “target” in the draft, Yi Jianlian. IF the Warriors want him bad enough, they could trade Brandon Wright and their #14 pick to the Bucks for Yi.

If the Bucks are seriously planning on using their #8 pick on Alexander, a player who will also likely be available at #13, but not #14. Portland may be able to dangle a package of current and future 2nd round picks (and maybe Sergio too) to swap #8 for our #13. Giving Milwaukie building blocks of Brandon Wright plus the #13 and #14 picks, and Euro Prospects up the wazzoo. Milwaukie could add Alexander at SF and a banger like Mareese Speights, DeAndre Jordan, or Robin Lopez to help out with the post toughness. This would really help out the Bucks front court long-term. Plus, Milwaukie could add some talent for down the road that will be developing overseas.

If Portland needed to keep pick #36 and instead give the Bucks concessions of a future first rounder in say 2010, I would still be okay with this.

I have preached it before and I will preach it again: THIS IS OUR LAST LOTTERY DRAFT for quite some time. KP and Co. need to take full advantage of this and draft the elite guard that they are looking for. Trade UP. that is Portland’s only option.

Is this little deal between Milwaukie and Portland feasible?

Portland would draft a guard

by Portland Dynasty on Jun 17, 2008 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

hahahaha

What is this www.bucksedge.com and warriorsedge.com???

Love it

by PETRO KID on Jun 18, 2008 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Whatever, we'll be better.

Oden and Fernandez, the #13 or a trade, and the cap next year means we have to clear some roster room. 4 new players – if we go there, means something needs to give. KP isn’t going to tip his hand to me – that’s for sure. And frankly, he’s in the middle of it now, and it isn’t over. And, the deal he does or doesn’t make on draft day may not be the last one. And, given that a lot of other teams are busy talking as well – you never really know what might show up. And, it is amazing how these mock drafts keep revising their boards. Who knows, for you guard guys – will it be Augustin? He’s here for a full day alone. Someone likes him. Personally, I think Alexanders a good bet too. Oh well. Then some love Westbrook. He’s always had his fans. And, if Jordan and Alexander move up – it almost guarantees that Augusting will drop into our lap, and Westbrook will be within a couple of spots. If KP wants them – he can get them. And that’s the good news. We’ll be better. Questions is, how much?

by Eben Calder on Jun 16, 2008 4:15 PM PDT reply actions  

Trading the pick

The questions I think need answering by KP and staff and the coaches is: Which players in this draft are likely to be better than McBob? And of those players (if any), which are within our reasonable means to acquire? Only if the answer to both questions is at least one do we wait to see if we can acquire that player with our picks. The same questions can be asked for Jack or Outlaw or Webster as well. Otherwise I think we trade out of the draft and ride another year or at least to the trade deadline in February.

Joe Alexander, Brandon Rush, etc. might be good enough to acquire under those conditions. The word from Draft Express today:

Brandon Rush also drew some extremely high praise, as his size, length and skill-level were mentioned as big pluses, as was the fact that he can play two positions and looks to be in terrific shape athletically. He played strong defense, shot the ball well from outside, and even showed some nice craftiness with a few hook shots inside. Most executives we spoke with have Rush going either at 15 (Phoenix) or 17 (Toronto) in their personal mock drafts, but there is a chance that a team like Seattle or Cleveland for example could jump up ahead of them and take him at 13th if they can strike a deal with Portland (whose pick is clearly on the block).

This indicates that trade is the more likely action. As a draft journalist and evaluator, Givony has done well with GMs around the league in recent years and seems to get more right than most. How amazing that we are so quickly in a position to not take a player at all and be fine after some really bad years!

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Jun 16, 2008 5:33 PM PDT reply actions  

Draft Depth

This post makes a good point. To some teams, draft depth may be deeper than initally expected and some late teams in draft may have their eyes on a mid-first rounder. KP has said time after time: will a trade make us better? I’m not a GM, but I see “make us better” as not necessarily talent wise (we definitely already have talent), but also financially, roster space, etc.

I agree with the fact made that we can choose the “none of the above” option and still be comfortable with what we have.

First, with a starting lineup that consists of Roy, Aldridge, and Oden, we need the following: shooters, shooters, shooters. For this reason, I have 21 year-old Martell Webster (who has improved behind the arc each year) as my SF for years to come. As for the PG, give me somebody who could also shoot, handle the ball, and make an effort on D. (Sounds like Stevey B will do for me).

Bench play, bench play, bench play = 2-man game between Outlaw and Rudy. Everybody else is expendable. (Pryz at Center). With the possibility of a James Jones departure, we could use a SF: Joe Alexander? Fourth person off bench would be a toss-up between a developing Joe Alexander, a developing McRoberts, or Channing Frye. We are obviously stacked at the 3 or 4 for the second unit, each with their own unique advantages / disadvantages.

Channing—good fit for second unit: outside shooting / lacks toughness (but would be playing behind Prz now)
McRoberts—atheletic, passing / still developing
Joe Alexander—aggressive defender, quick, atheletic, finishes at the rim well, and toughness. So much comparison between him and Outlaw. Potentially good mesh between the two? Rudy, Outlaw, Alexander could be a good trio and compliment each other.

All in all, I like what we already have.

by PETRO KID on Jun 16, 2008 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes

But you didn’t mention Jack. If the Blazers could package their pick and Jack to get the 10th or 11th pick to pick Westbrook, wouldn’t that be worth it? Then you would have Blake on the first unit and Westbrook on the second, with the added caveat of Westbrook’s potential to take over the starting role in a few years.

by bleedingblackandred on Jun 16, 2008 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

What about Koponen?

Koponen is apparently coming to Portland soon to be ready for Summer League. He is supposed to be 6’ 4” or so. Sergio is developing although he is not a favorite of Sarge. If we cannot move up to get Westbrook or Bayless, why take a point guard? We also have a number of good developing small forwards. Martell should be a senior in college this year. Remember how young he is and how much he has improved already. I think of Travis as a small forward. If they cannot resign Jones then it makes sense to draft Alexander.

With the number of injuries our big guys have had, I suggest we draft big either Brook Lopez who has dropped some so far, or DeAndre Jordan but who is 6’ 9.75” barefoot, or Kosta Koufos this year’s freshman Ohio State center (what an oddity—taking back to back Ohio State centers). We will be losing Raef LaFrentz after this season. Koufos is said to be a sure top 10 pick next year. Take him this year and let him grow on the bench.

by OrygunRod on Jun 16, 2008 7:20 PM PDT reply actions  

+1

I would like to see us add a “Banger” to Our Team.

It may be McThuggin’ but still another would be nice.

"Always Willing, Ever Able" - rivbike.com
"If you don't want to get banged. Don't go in there" - Van Gundy

by BlueBooYay on Jun 16, 2008 8:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

That' what I like 'bout Joe

I think he’s a bit like Harpring. TO isn’t. Iluvs me Trout when ya hit ‘im ina head & he gets PO’d!

"Always Willing, Ever Able" - rivbike.com
"If you don't want to get banged. Don't go in there" - Van Gundy

by BlueBooYay on Jun 16, 2008 8:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Finesse big men

I think we have enough already with Aldridge and Frye. I think they are great players, but we probably need someone a little more physical than Koufos if we were to pick a big guy.

Koponen is interesting, but is, in every sense of the word, a project. We’ll have to wait a little bit to see what kind of NBA player he is.

by bleedingblackandred on Jun 16, 2008 8:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Another Big Man

For those thinking of a big man, don’t forget Serge Ibaka. He’s the mystery man some think may move up. He’s raw, out of the Congo, only 18, but at 6’10” and almost 230 lbs, showed the type of skills recently that caught the eyes of a number of GM’s at the Euro-Camp. Most seemed to think he had the most raw talent of anyone at that camp. And, he’s got the tools to be a real banger. Some GM’s commented that he might end up being the best PF out of this draft. The mock’s have had him in the 22 to 30 slots. Now, some think he may move up into the 15 – 20.

by Eben Calder on Jun 17, 2008 5:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Chicago and Ben Gordon

Some of you may recall the rumored Blazer interest in Ben Gordon. The HoopsWorld Analysis of the Chicago Bulls and their salary structure makes a solid case that if the Bulls draft Rose, then it’s almost certain that Ben Gordon will be gone because they can’t keep both Deng, the 1st rounder and Gordon, without going over the top number w/the luxury tax of $70 million. And, with a core guard group of Rose, Hinrich, Hughes and Sefolosha, Gordon would be out. Further, Hinrich will stay as even though Rose is the PG of the future, Hinrich provides the veteran PG necessary to both play and support Rose. At the same time, Chicago can’t dump Gordon’s expected $9 million salary if they take back a similar salaried player. And Portland’s younger guards don’t have that issue. Interesting.

by Eben Calder on Jun 17, 2008 6:51 AM PDT reply actions  

things you need to know about Joe Alexander:

1. he’s only been playing organized basketball for 5 years. is this a bad thing? not for the blazers. if he’d been playing longer, we might not even be talking about the possibility of drafting him. the fact that he’s good enough that we are talking about drafting him despite this little experience is tremendous, and the upside to this kid is incredible.

2. it’s popular to call joe alexander a ‘tweener 3-4. a lot of the time, that’s bad news for a player, because the usual implication is that the person in question can’t play either position. in Joe’s case, i would call it more of a strength. his body type is very similar to LeBron James’ body, and his athletecism is also on par. i know that sounds like a really lofty statement, but consider this—there is a still photo floating around the ‘net of Alexander headbutting the rim on a one-step vertical jump… after a 3 hour, high intensity workout, and after a dunking exhibition which included him dunking from the foul line, and doing a one-step vertical dunk into elbow-hang (the one made famous by vince carter).

3. weaknesses? the biggest knocks on joe alexander right now are these:
a) his jump shot is inconsistent. why is it inconsistent? he’s got a little scissor-kick he does when he goes up to shoot. his form from the waist up is not only solid, he also has a very high starting point for his jumper—about five inches above the top of his forehead, a la Michael Finley, Rasheed Wallace, etc. then there’s the fact that when he shoots a jumper, his natural lift is over 2 feet off the floor. that adds up to a shot that’s nearly impossible to block. AND, all it’s going to take to make him more consistent is a season or two working with a shooting coach to correct that scissor kick.
b) his ball handling isn’t as stable as it could be towards the end of dribble drives. i have yet to note, or to read note of any report citing issues at the start of moves from the wing. his first step is a doozie. again, this issue is easily corrected over the course of one or two seasons.
c) his lateral quickness on the wing is said to be average, which people say may cause issues for him guarding NBA 3s. you know who else has average lateral quickness? paul pierce… the guy who has been causing all these issues for Kobe (who i should point out is faster than virtually any nba 3, or most of his fellow 2s for that matter). all this means is that he’ll need to refine his footwork and understanding of nba team defense. this won’t even require a full season with his work ethic, assuming he has a good defensive coach working with him. say… what is mcmillan known for, anyway?... i’m just saying…

4) strengths?
a) he’s a beast in the mid to low post. remember that inconsistent jumper? well… his turnaround jumper isn’t getting any complaints about inconsistency. from 10 and in, it’s pretty much money in the bank. and he still gets that incredible lift, and has that high release. he can also shoot his turnaround going to either shoulder equally effectively. that’s a very rare thing, and makes him a huge pain to cover.
b) athletecism. he’s a demon around the rim, whether it’s rebounding or exploding to the hoop for scores. he isn’t the kind of guy you’ll see go to the rim showing dunk, then trying to twist for a layup if it’s contested. he’s the kind of guy you see go up and try to rip someone’s arm off if they contest him.
c) tenacity. he’s famous for being a workhorse. he said going into his predraft workouts that one of the main things he wanted to show teams was that he “is very coachable”. guess what reviews are saying? he’s extremely coachable! people putting him through drills or scouting him continually talk about his motor and his will to do anything he can to help his team win. they also talk over and over again about how fearless he is.
d) his learning curve. he’s very smart, he’s a basketball junkie, and he is incredibly driven to get better. remember that bit about only playing organized ball for 5 years? consider how far he’s come already. now… consider what a guy this smart, with this work ethic, humility, and athletecism is going to look like after 2 seasons with nba coaches developing him. seriously.

5) he’s a character guy. we love those.

6) rudy’s coming for the ‘08-’09 season! if he’s anywhere near as good as advertized, i think we’ll be looking at a future backcourt of Rudy & Roy. while they are both natural 2s, they also each have well above-average ball handling ability, great size, and are above average passers. if we use those two in the backcourt together, and have them split handling duties, we’re looking great, and we won’t need to draft a 1.

7) travis outlaw, martell webster… these guys mean we have all the time we need to let alexander become the force he can become. if he evolves into a starter (and i think he could, easily), we have the luxury of keeping Outlaw coming off the bench. i know a lot of people want to start him, but the bottom line is that Outlaw coming off the bench is a huge problem for a lot of teams. he can come in at the 2, 3, or 4 as needed, and he is instant offense and energy. webster? he’s not as consistent as he could be, but he’s still young, and he’s making good progress. again, a guy who can come in at the 2 or the 3 and pose problems.

8) matchups… a big theme in the nba. you want as many of them to be favorable as possible, right? your starting lineup in 2 years would probably be rudy, roy, 3, aldridge, oden. since we know mcmillan likes a pure-shooting 3 at the 3 spot, lets say it’s webster still. time for a breather? no problem. you sub in outlaw at the 2, 3, or 4, and alexander at the 3 or 4. those two guys coming in allow you to pull out any 2 of your starting 5 and cause automatic matchup issues. imagine being an opposing coach trying to match up against:

rudy-
roy-
outlaw-
alexander-
oden—

sure, your center goes on oden. here’s the issue… your 1 and your 3 are getting posted up. your 4 is on either alexander or outlaw, and that guy is being pulled away from the bucket to make space for your post advantages, or to find his help cleared out while he gets blown by. on the other end, alexander is strong enough to cover 4s, which means outlaw, roy, and rudy-who are all long and quick- are sharking passing lanes with oden clogging the middle. all of your help defenders are long and agile.

and the fast breaks? you’re all quick, your trailer is a truck, and every one of those guys can play way above the rim.

please draft joe alexander.

by Bidwell on Jun 17, 2008 2:14 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Good job

way to break it down. One thing though. Your proposed lineup really does not have enough shooting in it, unless Rudy is even better than advertised and Outlaw/Roy improve a lot. Mostly it’s composed of mid-range to slashers/post up. Which is fine, but you need more than one major three point threat on the floor to keep it spaced for Oden. I’d probably say you need to keep Outlaw coming in off the bench and put a shooter on the floor at the 3.

Otherwise, nice job.

by jamon51 on Jun 18, 2008 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

I want to pair the "Vanilla Sky" (Joe) with the "Vanilla Gorilla" (Joel)

That must be a good omen. I’m pretty sure about that.

Coach, I promise I wasn't running hard ...

by Norsktroll on Jun 17, 2008 11:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.
Cs-sj_053_small
10 Years of 1st Round Blazer Draft Picks
Small
Draft Drawer: Pre-Lotto
Small
Trade Drawer: The Big 5?
Kpavatar2_small
Not 5, not 6, not 7, not EVER - Junk with Heat poll

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Draft via Draft Express
Small
Drummond, Lamb, Machado
Dsc01448_small
GM History
Small
What will be the future of our Blazers. Just a few seasons ago, the Blazers were going to be the OKC of the NBA but injuries to Roy and Oden crippled our dreams of a young championship contender for years and years.
Small
Beal and Marshall!!!
Small
Batum: "It could be worse then Portland"
Albert-einstein-funny-face-gel-coated-textured-art_small
Playoffs: Whiners Not Winners
H_small
B-Roy as player development coach?
Small
Brent Barry for GM
Duck_pot_small
Thing COULD be worse...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Maybe this is what we need to succeed...
Quick: Stern Says Blazers Not For Sale; More GM Interviews Coming
Freeman: Blazers Want To Bring Over Joel Freeland, Victor Claver

Recent FanShots

Stern Working to Adopt FIBA goaltending rules, Flopping penalities
Colonel Rondo and his second round armada? 

If Boston is determine to rebuild and cut salary isn’t two mid lotto pics and the right salary filler decent. Maybe not enough but better than what most teams get in that situation.  I would prefer that over the Chris Paul package.

I hope and figure that the Trail Blazers could have the best of both worlds. I’ve never seen a more bountiful 2nd round. Its conceivable that the team could deal both lotto picks and still find some nice players in the draft.  Players like Orlando Johnson, Lucas Nogueira, Kevin Jones, Will Barton are 1st rounders in most drafts even if its just based on hype and potential. Then you have some possible gems in such a deep draft like Machado, a couple guys that I personally like from Georgetown-their center Henry Sims and forward Hollis Tompson.  Both high upside players that I would love to watch in the summer league.  If PA were to ever buy into or trade into late first or second round now is the time. Give me Freeland, Diebler and four second rounders in the summer league with Rondo coaching.
Orlando Magic Fire Coach Stan Van Gundy
Terry "Versatility" Porter
OT: The (New) San Francisco Warriors
Still tear up every time I see a highlight of this guy... He literally meant the world to Blazer...
Hibbert talks loyalty towards Pacers
This is going to be a great game. Granger vs. James
Teaford: Blazers Still Haven't Contacted Lakers Regarding GM Kupchak
The Onion - Heat Lose Chris Bosh Indefinitely To Severe Poetic Justice

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm