Blazer's Edge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Simon Says: Jamaal 'outlived his welcome here' Bar-right-arrows



Which Core would you rather have?

 

If you look at the Western Conference contenders, we can sort 'em into several groups:

1) The old.  Dallas, Phoenix, and San Antonio are all in this category.  Denver, too--'Melo is still a fresh young face, but guys like Camby and Iverson are old men basketball-wise.

2)The in-their-prime.  That would be the Lakers; who are led by a pair of seasoned veterans in Kobe and Pau.  Kobe's now in the latter half of his career, but he's still at top performance and probably will be for a couple years.

3) The chronically hurt.  That would be the Rockets, mainly, with both T-Mac and Yao spending lots of time on the shelf. 

4) The chronically short.  I'm looking at you, Golden State; a team with about six All-Star caliber players in the backcourt (OK, three), and an NBDL frontcourt (OK, it ain't that bad).  One that can knock off lousy defensive teams like Dallas, but gets stomped as soon as it plays anybody good.

AND...

5) The up-and-comers.  The Jazz, the Hornets, and the Blazers.  Utah and NO are both in the second round, so they are quite a few years ahead of the curve on the Blazers, but many pundits love our young core.  All three teams have a triumvirate, more or less, of young players, led by an All-Star caliber guard and excellent big men.

So...which trifecta would you rather have?  No mixing and matching; this is not a Chinese restaurant.  Package deals only.

1) The one we got:  Brandon Roy, Greg Oden, and LMA?  Roy's an All-Star; LMA has star potential and showed significant improvement his sophomore season.  Oden is an MVP-caliber prospect, albeit one who has yet to play an NBA game.

2) The one presently thumping the Spurs:  Chris Paul, David West, and Tyson Chandler:  Paul is a legit MVP candidate in his third season.  West is an All-Star and a beast on the blocks.  Chandler is playing like a DPOY candidate, and has been kicking Tim Duncan around like he was getting old.  (Wait a minute-- he is).

3) The one who just thumped Houston, but could only watch while Kobe shot *21 freaking free throws*--Carlos Boozer, Mehmut Okur, and Deron Williams.  Boozer is the ultimate garbageman on the blocks and a multi-time All Star; Okur is also a former All-Star, and DW should be.  While DW doesn't get the press that CP3 does, it hasn't gone beyond notice that Williams *kicks Paul's asterisk every time they play each other*.


Note that in all three cases, the triumvirate consists of 1/4/5; except possibly for Brandon Roy who is officially a 2 but frequently runs the Blazer offense.

Would you swap our Big Three for one of the other two?  I'll throw in a couple other "Big Threes" for fun--the Lakers, the Magic, and (heh) Cleveland.  Boston's Big Three is not included, again, because they are too old.

Ignore the salary cap, of course.  Keep in mind; that the other big threes are presently in the second round of the playoffs whereas ours didn't make it (one leg of the stool being hurt obviously).  But ours is the youngest.

 

Poll
Which "Big Three" would you rather have?
  • Our own: Roy, Oden, Aldridge
  • Nawlins: Paul, West, Chandler
  • Yootahs: Williams, Boozer, Okur
  • the Fakers: Kobe, Pau, Bynum
  • the Magic: Dwight, Rashard, Hedo
  • The Cavs: LeBron, NBDL Scrub #1, and NBDL Scrub #2

  255 votes | Results

5 recs | Comment 135 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

I'm the traitor who voted for New Orleans

and it’s based on injuries and future injury-proneness. The injury bug has bitten all of our Big Three repeatedly, and that’s cause for concern to me. If Oden comes back healthy and Dwight Howard-level monstrous, then I’ll gladly eat my words. But in two years, we need Oden > Chandler, because Paul > Roy and West = LMA (in two years I feel that this will be true—their sophomore stats are nearly mirror images of one another).

For the moment, looking at the success that the Hornets are already having that we’re only hoping to have soon, I’d go with their Terrific Trio.

by BlazersOrBust on May 6, 2008 11:03 AM PDT   0 recs

Injuries

are the one thing that would make me agree with you. If our guys are chronically hurt this will go down as yet another sad “almost” era in Blazer history.

However if they can stay healthy, let’s put it this way: the Hornets, as hot as they are right now, have not yet won a single championship. I don’t know many people who are confident about them winning multiples. Personally I think they’re likely to get tripped up in one of these three remaining series. That trio of Oden/Aldridge/Roy, surrounded by a reasonably competent supporting cast, has multiple title runs written all over it. They have EVERYTHING: scoring, rebounding, defense, running, halfcourt offense, size, athleticism, smarts, dedication. Just add a couple shooters and another playmaker somewhere in there and watch out. I’m not trying to be a super-homer here. If we were still looking at a Zach-Bonzi lineup I’d say so. But I would not trade our future for anything right now…not even a ring this year (and I want a ring worse than anything). That’s how good we have the potential to be.

—Dave

by Dave on May 6, 2008 3:37 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Um..its 4 in the afternoon

I thought vampires only come out at night.

by Sabonis4Ever on May 6, 2008 3:38 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

There's no sun in MY office during the day.

There are also no windows.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 8:09 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Call me a homer

I would take the Blazers core without blinking. Outside of Dwight, there’s not a big in there that can be in the same sentence with Oden in a few years. Paul and LBJ are special but their supporting cast isn’t (I like West but he’s no all-star w/o CP3).

Sometimes I feel like I'm going in different directions...

by porterfan30 on May 6, 2008 11:08 AM PDT   0 recs

Blazer's ceiling is higher due to Oden

But New Orleans is already there.

by tweener on May 6, 2008 11:25 AM PDT   0 recs

They aren't there yet

They haven’t made it to the Conference Finals even. Personally I’d love to see them go all the way for the breath of fresh air it would provide and because Chris Paul is totally inspirational, but I can name you a bunch of teams who have gotten as far as the Hornets have so far and not turned out to be champions, or even long-term threats.

—Dave

by Dave on May 6, 2008 3:39 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Me too. I'd love to see the Hornets go for the championship.

A couple of months ago, in a thread speculating about who people picked for the Western Conference if not the Blazers, I picked the Hornets. There was a resounding silence at the time. I wish I could find that thread.

"We comin along." Travis Outlaw

by annthefan on May 6, 2008 6:00 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I remember it

I’m just not telling you where I saw it.

"Show some respect to this living legend, this hall of famer...Arvydas Sabonis." - Bill Walton

by tominhawaii on May 6, 2008 6:52 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

You stinker!

"We comin along." Travis Outlaw

by annthefan on May 6, 2008 7:04 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

You had to know the response to this question.

Everyone on this site would pick the blazers core since they are the best choice.

"The next day in practice, if you sweat, it's going to come out of your pores, regardless. If you ask any coach around the league how many times they have smelled liquor on a player . . . As long as that player is showing up on time, doing the drills and running, that's part of it. But there have been times, yeah. Yeah, you probably smelled liquor on me. But it's not like I'm at practice drunk. I'm totally focused."
-Darius Miles

by Steve Guttenberg on May 6, 2008 11:33 AM PDT   0 recs

I picked the Blazers

However, for me, it was a close choice between us and the Lakers.

by robrun2 on May 6, 2008 11:36 AM PDT   0 recs

The thing about the Hornets is

that every one is talking about them contending with us but I see one big problem with them: Peja.

He is their 3rd leading scorer and hits .441 from 3 opening up the lane for Paul and West to work. He also hits .440 from the field so he is a threat from anywhere on the court. He is also 30 and should begin to slow down here in a few years as he has already began declining as this year as his scoring has decreased the past few years
16.4 this year,
17.8,
18.2,
20.1,
with a high of 24.2 in 03-04

He was out 5 games and the won 3 but 2 of them were against Seattle, the other win was against Phx but only by 3 and Den and we beat them without Peja. Once he goes out they will lose a lot of their scoring. Of course this doesnt take into account Paul getting better, but he is playing so well right now it is hard to see him getting loads better.

by SpyderRyder on May 6, 2008 11:37 AM PDT   0 recs

yeah but...

3 pt gunners like Peja can be replaced via free agency. All world PGs cannot.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on May 6, 2008 11:44 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Peja

Isn’t jsut a three point gunner. He’s also a major scorer on that team and guys with his talent (when he’s healthy) are NOT in abundance. If they were so easy to find, the blazers would have found one when they needed that skill instead of drafting webster.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 12:28 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

What he said ^^^

Yeah 3pt gunners are never 24PPG scorers. During Sacs playoff run Peja was deadly with Webber down low and Bibby working the point.

by SpyderRyder on May 6, 2008 12:32 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

John Nash drafted Webster

and it was a mistake.

Phoenix basically paid us to take James Jones away from us. I agree Peja is more than a 3 pt gunner and is better than a scrub they could pick up, but I don’t think his eventual retirement will prevent the Hornets from being a really good team. They’ll have a relatively easy time finding someone who can replace most but not all of his contributions.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on May 6, 2008 12:54 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

That mistake got us Roy Aldridge and Oden

maybe he wouldnt have been on the hot seat we would have completely diferent players and needs, and lottery choices if we had Paul. Imagine the dynamic duo of Portlands future—- CP3 and ZBo

by raging WebTed on May 6, 2008 7:02 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm not sure that we don't still get Roy and Aldridge from that.

Oden, definitely not, but what a backcourt that would have made. In the long run, it may end up a wash, and the whole thing is moot. But then what would we talk about?

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 6, 2008 7:12 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I also think it is "moo" point

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ifdqEmlx-I&feature=related

"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and miss" Robert A. Heinlein

by 92wastheyear on May 6, 2008 7:22 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Sorry guys

I went with the Lakers. They were the best team in the West and we haven’t even seen Bynum together with Pau yet. This team is going to be scary good for the next 5 years. Once Kobe is no longer elite, their run will be over, but I think they are a surer bet to win a title with their core than New Orleans or the Blazers.

Note that I’m just talking basketball here- I’d much rather ROOT for our guys than the Lakers, but with the uncertainty around Oden and the absolute certainty that Kobe and CP3 are both way better than anyone we have right now, I’d have to rank it like this:

1) Lakers
2) Hornets
3) Blazers
4) Jazz
5) Magic

If Oden turns out to be better than Bynum and a few other things go our way, I could easily imagine us shooting up to #1. Its just that the Lakers and Hornets are ALREADY contending and there’s still a lot that could go wrong for us.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on May 6, 2008 11:42 AM PDT   0 recs

Yup

Well said. I really, really don’t like the idea of having to get past a Farmar-Kobe-Odom-Gasol-Bynum starting five with Fisher, Rad-Man, Viuijic and Turiaf coming off the bench. The L*kers have it all right now—size at every position, athleticism, offensive firepower, three-point shooting, a coach who has nearly as many rings as fingers, and the single best player in the NBA today.

::Rips off “Roy is my ROY” tee-shirt to reveal Kobe jersey underneath:: Changing my handle to LakersOrBust! Whooo!

by BlazersOrBust on May 6, 2008 11:50 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I think it's NO or Lakers this year

and lakers for the next couple, but I believe that the blazers will meet their potential, and their potential is scary and greater than the lakers can be.

I will sacrifice the now for hope of a longer tomorrow.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 12:27 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

That sums up my thoughts on the matter

If it fills a need, if it fills a rebuilding situation. And my goal is to fill and rebuild and I am not going to be shortsighted.
- Isiah Thomas

by JTDuck22 on May 6, 2008 1:50 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I would *rather* have the Blazers

that said, I think Kobe’s team will dominate for the next 2-3 years. After that, it’s all Portland.

It's a WAR, and we're bringin' the BOOM!

by prezofdeath on May 6, 2008 11:47 AM PDT   0 recs

2-3? I'm worried it will be more like 5.

Kobe is only 30. Pau is only 28. Bynum is like 14. It’s possible we’ll be ready to beat them in the playoffs in 2-3 years but It’s going to be awfully tough.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on May 6, 2008 11:58 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I agree with you the risk of a laker five...

But lakers can’t win on the blazers home court and I think Oden and LMA will be greater than pau and bynum. When we get better on the road and grow more, we’ll be beating teams on the road as well as we do at home.

Toss in Rudy
toss in Roy… I think you’re now greater than Kobe.

Then we have outlaw
Then we have webster
Then we have Frye (who’s getting better, but I’ll take flack on that one)
Then we have that missing piece.

We also have smart management even if the Zen master may be greater than Nate.

Honestly… our management is what tips me over to the blazers.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 12:34 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

So... if management is what tips me and we're only looking at core:

New Orleans healthy is appealing to me but I CAN doubt the health!

Lakers come in first because their core is now and should last a bit plus I don’t need to worry about the future unknowns (like lakers getting gasol making life tough on the teams in the west) messing me up.

blazers come in second because I don’t look at the rest of the team or management’s ability to fill the holes and because our core isn’t proven enough yet while the lakers ARE proven and have a guy who’s been there before.

I DO take the blazer team over the lakers because I believe in management and I believe in our potential and i have the fail safe of other good players.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 12:43 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

This makes me really mad at Memphis

I don’t get how you can give a solid post player to a team with the best player in the league and a great up and comer at the 5 for Jarvis Critton and Marc Gasol. It would be a bad trade if it were with a team in a different conference, but giving Pau away to a team in your conference is downright Turrible

If it fills a need, if it fills a rebuilding situation. And my goal is to fill and rebuild and I am not going to be shortsighted.
- Isiah Thomas

by JTDuck22 on May 6, 2008 1:52 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

AGREED

I hate the Grizz for that trade. Turrible is right.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on May 6, 2008 1:59 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah

but they won’t going anywhere and it’s possible that they didn’t want to have a Garnet moment where they’re stuck in purg for the next 10 years.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 8:11 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

The future Pau/Bynum will basically replace the current Odom/Pau.

So I don’t really see the L[xxx]rs improving much.
As Bynum’s production ramps up, Odom’s will slide down.
They’re NOT going to improve; they’ll just maintain their current level beyond Odom’s impending deterioration.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 6, 2008 7:05 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Huh?

They play different positions. So it’s conceivable that Bynum will get better, Pau and Kobe will stay good, and they will replace Odom with someone who can contribute as much if not more. Not to mention Farmar and Vujacic will get better. So, I actually think they can improve in the next few couple years.

by bfan on May 6, 2008 9:21 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

No, Pau plays center now, with Odom at power forward.

They will replace the Odom/Pau PF/C tandem with a Pau/Bynum PF/C tandem.

Not the same position, but it’s still one comes in, the other phases out, with Pau as the constant (except shifting positions).

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 7, 2008 9:23 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Oh, and you mention Farmat getting better.

Yes, he will, but that just means he’ll adequately replace (not IMPROVE UPON) Derek Fisher.

Mind you, when I said, “they’ll just maintain their current level beyond Odom’s impending deterioration,”
I should’ve added that that’s actually a very big deal.
A team playing this well with Odom and Fisher as two of their starters should be expected to fade in the next 3 years,
and Bynum and Farmar kill that possibility.

Maintaining the “current level” IS scary when that current level is best-record-in-the-West good.
I just don’t think they’ll IMPROVE on that, is all.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 7, 2008 9:27 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Non-objective

I don’t see how a true fan (I’m not trying to call anyone out, though) could choose another team. Part of being a fan of a team is forming a (one-sided) relationship with the players. I feel like Brandon, LaMarcus, and Greg are friends of mine. Would you trade three of your friends for three other guys? Even if they bought all your beer? I wouldn’t.

I can appreciate haggling over statistical differences and projections of future success, but I just plain like all the guys on our team. Even if they don’t win a championship in the next 5 years, I like them and will stand by them.

I could much more easily answer this question if the Blazers weren’t included at all, but including them in the choices introduces a whole host of confounding factors that aren’t even remotely related to performance on the court.

It’s an interesting question, but I wouldn’t expect to gain too much insight by asking it of such a biased sample.

by Diesel10 on May 6, 2008 11:51 AM PDT   0 recs

I saw the question as "which core is best"

I don’t think any of us would trade our core for one of those other groups- we’re too emotionally invested. However, that doesn’t change my opinion that LA and NO are in better positions to win titles than we are. In order to make rational arguments, you have to remove your bias sometimes. Doesn’t make you any less of a fan.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on May 6, 2008 11:54 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

better position NOW

but I see us in the better position in two years and for a run that will last longer.

the issues with that is a lot can change in two years, and I suspect that’s your point. Having the position and potential of position are two different things.

Still, I’d take the blazers because I believe we’ll milk the most out of them much like New Orleans has been out of their team.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 12:25 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

you say five years

I say ten years blazers.

The difference is that i say 2-3 years lakers which means that your bird is worth less than my two bushes in my mind while in your mind they’re close to equal.

of course… you can eat your bird now while i’m still out hunting.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 1:04 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yes I would trade

But ONLY if they bought all my beer.

"The next day in practice, if you sweat, it's going to come out of your pores, regardless. If you ask any coach around the league how many times they have smelled liquor on a player . . . As long as that player is showing up on time, doing the drills and running, that's part of it. But there have been times, yeah. Yeah, you probably smelled liquor on me. But it's not like I'm at practice drunk. I'm totally focused."
-Darius Miles

by Steve Guttenberg on May 6, 2008 2:32 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Blazers, Lakers, Hornets, and Jazz

Slugging it out for the title every year for the next ten years. Sweet! We need stiff competition to make our eventual dominance official.

by MiledAnimal on May 6, 2008 12:13 PM PDT   0 recs

pffft

to hornets and Jazz.

Hornets will need viagra to be in that bunch.
The jazz will never rise to the opportunity as they’re just not that good.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 12:44 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Don't look now, rat

but the Hornets are two games from the Western Conference finals.

by MiledAnimal on May 6, 2008 2:11 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

counting chickens

playing in San Antonio for games 3 & 4 might change things….. Im not ready to count out the Spurs just yet… for some odd reason I think they can come back strong from 0-2…

If you dont talk to your cats about catnip, who will?

by bow4meow on May 6, 2008 5:38 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

naw

they’re going down.

If they don’t I’ll pull a fatty except I won’t because I’d break my ban by the next day.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 8:14 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

still that confident?

the Spurs seemed to have figured something out…. well, home court seems to mean all the difference, so I say its going to 7 games and the Spurs would be hard to beat even in Norleans

If you dont talk to your cats about catnip, who will?

by bow4meow on May 12, 2008 9:22 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

game 7 RAT!

Dont go Borgarting on your offer now. Spurs win game 7, better coaching. Nice try tho.

If you dont talk to your cats about catnip, who will?

by bow4meow on May 17, 2008 1:04 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Meow Meow Meow Meow Meow Meow Meow Meow*

I want bobcats
I want their liver
Meow fix Ratbastird
please deliver

*not intendended to usurp the reigning poet laureates

If you dont talk to your cats about catnip, who will?

by bow4meow on May 19, 2008 9:57 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

yes... and they're a one hit wonder

The stars are aligning and I think they’ll win a championship if they can beat the lakers. However, I don’t see a repeat next year.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 8:13 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

For the Jazz, I wonder about Sloan.

He’s good right now and for the forseeable future, but ten years down the road.
Don’t forget, Lute Olsen played for Sloan.

(Okay, I made that last part up. Still, it has Truthiness.)

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 6, 2008 7:08 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I thought is was Dr James Naismith

That played for Sloan. Wait….maybe is was actually Abner Doubleday

"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and miss" Robert A. Heinlein

by 92wastheyear on May 6, 2008 7:25 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I picked the L*kers

Only because I have yet to see what Oden can bring. If you ask me next year, I’ll probably say the Blazers. Ugh…now I have to take a shower or change my screen name. Feel so dirty.

BINGO, BANGO, BONGO

by blzrfan on May 6, 2008 12:15 PM PDT   0 recs

That's why I couldn't make that pick

Why soil yourself for a fanpost?

by MiledAnimal on May 6, 2008 2:13 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Blazers but it depends

Do I want to win now or in the future.

Nawlins is rawkin but what if Peja goes down again? They have an excellent mix that is rather shakey. YOu need that strong inside presence and sharp shooting scoring for this team to work.

The you have the fawkers. I think they have a good chance of surviving for at the championship level for 4-5 years before the blazers do some bumping. You have an up and coming center and honestly this team would be my second choice.

Blazers. You have uncertainty but HUGE potential and a LONG window where the other teams windows are smaller. this is the depends part. Do I want the chance now and almost certain, or slightly less certain but for the next 10 years? Aldridge will get better and be great. I see Roy playing at his current level and only making minor improvements. Oden is uncertain but his mediocre potential could take us to the championships and his max potential will cause us to dominate. also, you have Rudy on the wings.

Cavs: will never make it without something more for James. Jordan had Pippen.

Utah: HAHAHA not happening. they are just not good enough.

Magic: Sorry… Dwight is a beast but he’s not a leader. that team lacks the player that will take them over the top. Lewis that was not. I’m just glad blazer management wasn’t stupid enough to attempt to match that pricing.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 12:22 PM PDT   0 recs

L*kers will win this year and next.

NO won´t have a ring in the next 20 years.
From 2010 is “Blazers win” and only Blazers for a decade.

God gives bread to those that have no teeth.

by amlmart1 on May 6, 2008 12:33 PM PDT   0 recs

I don't know...

If NO sweep the spurs… I’d bet on NO against the lakers.

I do favor the lakers slightly right now, but NO is a VERY good team.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 12:37 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah; Hornies looked better in two games against the Spoors . . .

. . . than the L[xxx]rs did in that one game against the Jazz.
(I’m posting before tonight’s game 2, obviously; that score in a few hours might make this post look silly.)

But if L.A. and N.O. both advance? That, my friends, will be a SERIES.
In fact, a final four of L.A., N.O., th Sell-Tix and the Pissed-ons would be a killer field.
Good year for the last time for a while to follow the playoffs without having a Blazers team to focus on.
We be bless-ed.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 6, 2008 7:11 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I'll take a new CORE

Randolph, Curry and Marbury!!

New York, New York baby!! Hows that for a 1/4/5 combo?

by SpyderRyder on May 6, 2008 12:35 PM PDT   0 recs

speaking of...

whatever happened to NYfan?

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 12:38 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

make that

knicksfan.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 12:44 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

He got banned

He kept talking about flatulence one day and that was the end of him.

"Show some respect to this living legend, this hall of famer...Arvydas Sabonis." - Bill Walton

by tominhawaii on May 6, 2008 1:12 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

that must be

one heck of a hangover… or he’s still celebrating.

Ironically… it didn’t occur to me that he’d care about the knicks. After all… they’re not the blazers.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 8:16 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I had to take ours

I don’t think Utah has quite what it takes without a real center. I realize they’ve got some bruisers down there, but who will stop Oden? Who will stop Aldridge? Who will stop Roy? We match up too well with them.

The L@kers is the same thing… sure maybe we don’t have an answer for Kebo, but Pau will get run over by Oden or LaMarcus, Odom can’t hang with either of them either, we’ve got 6 extra fouls for both of them off the bench with Frye and Przy, and who can contest Roy? He took it right to Kobe this year.

New Orleans isn’t as deep as we are, and again look at the match ups. Do I think we can stop CP3… maybe not. But he won’t be able to stop Roy either. And with two hyper athletic bigs (and two more off the bench) we have the manpower to overwhelm them.

I don’t see how anyone else will pose any legitmate threats at this point.

We have the best core.

Blake brings it up on the right, swings it to Webster on the elbow, he moves around the key and passes to the low left block for Aldridge, Aldridge jukes baseline, turns back in and finds Roy cutting down the seam, ROY THROWS IT UP AT THE RIM FOR ODEN WHO THROWS IT DOWN FOR THE TWO HANDED MONSTER JAM!!! BOOM-SHAKA-LAKA!!! -Wheeler '08-'09

i can't wait

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on May 6, 2008 12:59 PM PDT   0 recs

I think the real argument comes down to:

Right now vs future.

Right now we haven’t proven ourselves. We have potential and if that potential is met, you’re right. If it’s not met, then the lakers get it.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 1:06 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm with you

I’ll take NO and then I’ll take Portland after a year. I need to see GO play a year and I want to see LMA and Roy play healthy for a year.

"Show some respect to this living legend, this hall of famer...Arvydas Sabonis." - Bill Walton

by tominhawaii on May 6, 2008 1:40 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

That's a good point

can we switch up the cores?

I’ll take NO this year, Lakers next year, and then the blazers after that.

Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!

by ratbastird on May 6, 2008 8:20 PM PDT