Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Stan Van Gundy Fired As Head Coach Of The Magic

Mayo and Roy

Ok, so I know this is going to be torn to threads but what about OJ Mayo?  He is a good perimeter defender, great scorer, and can handle the ball.  A backcourt of Roy and Mayo could be a great combination.  Either one can play the point. Rotate in Rudy and we have three oversized point guards that can still defend the 2.  

We offer the 'Wolves  #13, JJ,  and Martell, and receive #4, Brewer and Madsen (which works on the realGM site) or we involve a third team to make the numbers work with different players.  If they went for that trade we would receive a great defensive presence in Brewer, also. Who knows what McHale is willing to give away.  Our need for perimeter defense would be completely solved.

Obviously this is my first post, I check this site daily, please don't make me hate it.

Comment 106 comments  |  8 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I love the back court

Mayo would be perfect in the back court with Roy. I would rath trade Outlaw than webster though

by Blazermaniac77 on May 24, 2008 3:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Mayo would be great

Mayo has the lable: bad seed. However, most people who know him say he has great character and work ethic. I would rather get a guy who works hard and is less athletic than one who is a superfreak (although Mayo is no slouch). Mayo has the confidence to match Kobe Bryant, which has its pros and cons. But, when building a championship squad I think its important to have guys who feel like they can step up and beat anyone.

Mayo believes that he’s a point guard even though he really played the SG position in USC’s system. While he may not be the PG that he thinks he is, B Roy has some skills to compensate for a PG’s lack of playmaking abilities.

Most importantly, Mayo plays DEFENSE and likes it!

All that said, I think it will cost too much to move up and get Mayo. He has been hyped since he was a baby and his draft stock seems to be going up.

Side note: the wolves have 3rd pick and they would likely not want to give up on Brewer this early…McHale would be admitting another mistake and T’wolves fans would probably reach for the axe. I too would prefer to trade Outlaw and Outlaw probably has more league wide value. I think Ny or Memphis are likely trade targets…if KP is willing to sacrifice cap space to move up.

by neilan on May 24, 2008 3:42 AM PDT reply actions  

No more 'Big Shots' on the Blazers

People…remember Avery Johnson, Steve Kerr, Dennis Johnson (the 80’s), Derek Fisher. All of the people listed are PG and they all won a champinship ring but none of them are All Stars or a Big shot.

The Blazers have their three core players in Roy, LA and Oden. So all we need are decent role players and I believe we are very close in filling every positions we need for a Championship run. But we don’t need a Baron Davis who is an All Star and we don’t need the heavy contract of a Kirk H. He is not THAT much of an upgrade from Blake or JJ. Why spend the money? And we certainly don’t need Mayo. He seems like he would want the spot light on him all the time and that mentality doesn’t fit with the chemistry of the team.

The ONLY ingredient that the Blazers need now are time and experience. I have a very strong feeling that JJ will out play Blake for the starting position next year. His motivation will be his close friend Chris Paul. He want to be just as good as CP3 and will bust his butt this off season to improve all aspect of his game.

KP-Don’t make a move to get ride of JJ, Blake, Webster, Frye and especially Outlaw. Please draft the best player available even if it means K. Love. Let this team marinate and you will have a ring on your finger in a couple of years. That is the recipe for sucess. Myhumbleopinion…

by kungfukid on May 29, 2008 3:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Dennis Johnson had

an All-star berth or two…but otherwise good post

"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and miss" Robert A. Heinlein

by 92wastheyear on May 29, 2008 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mayo it is!

I’m convinced that OJ Mayo is going to be a very good player and if we decide to try and get a PG in the draft then he is the guy I see KP targeting. I think he would be the ideal backcourt mate to Brandon and with Rudy here I don’t think there is a team in the league that could have as much firepower from the guard positions as we will. And to top it off he likes to play defense!

I think his character issues are overblown and with the team and coach we have here I have a hard time believing he would ever be a problem.

If we get Mayo and he performs to moderate expectations then no one will be able to stop us.

by BlazerD on May 24, 2008 3:54 AM PDT reply actions  

An interesting idea.

I had to go look up the reports on Mayo, because I had never seriously considered him. Draft Express has an interesting interview with him here. He’s confident, that’s for sure, maybe to a fault. But he’s also polite to the interviewer, like Oden has been. I also like what Draft Express listed as his strengths: 3 point range, catch and shoot ability, shot creating ability, court vision, perimeter defense, work ethic, coachable, oh, and size. I think his weaknesses are fixable: turnovers, not getting to the free-throw line, finishing at the rim. I think my biggest concern with him would be whether or not he sticks around Portland when his contract is up. But, we could have him for quite a while, given restricted free agency, as long as he doesn’t decide to demand a trade. But the more I read about him, the less I think he will. Chad Ford has an interesting interview with him here.

So where do we need to get in at to draft him? The mock drafts I’ve been seeing put Mayo at #5 or #6, but if we wanted to be sure, we could try and trade for ‘Sota’s #3, OKC’s #4. But who are we willing to give up to get him? I hate to move people who we already know what they can do. I certainly wouldn’t give up any of the big three, and I like Travis enough to want to keep him as well (that, and AnntheFan would certainly #25 me if I thought otherwise). but do any of the rest of our guys, or combination of those guys equal the #3, #4, #5 or even #6? I’m not sure that even McHale takes Jack, Webster and the #13 for Brewer, Madsen and the #3. I think they’re still too big on Brewer. I don’t play with the trade machine enough to tell you. Maybe some other guys (and gals!) can come up with some ideas? Maybe we have to take back an ugly contract?

But still, a great post Bartender77. It made me look in a direction that I really hadn’t before. I’m not willing to jump on the trade-for-Rose bandwagon, but I think I’d be willing to jump on the trade-for-Mayo bandwagon.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 24, 2008 6:18 AM PDT reply actions  

Ford seems to think Mayo might go as early as #2.

Article here. If Chicago draft’s Rose, the theory is that Miami may still want a PG, and Mayo would fit the bill.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 24, 2008 6:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Minnesota won't do it

Even with the timberwolves recent history of dumb personel decisions I can’t imagine Minnesota going for it. This deal is way to one sided. Of course like you said you never know what Mchale is willing to give up.

JRogero

by JRogero on May 24, 2008 7:29 AM PDT reply actions  

The Wolves wouldn't agree unless...

We offer one or two of our second round picks, which personally I’m fine with. I like Mayo, yet like many of us, I get horrible flash backs to our Jail-Blazers era.

by alexfoster on May 24, 2008 8:26 AM PDT reply actions  

From what I've seen, I don't see it.

I think he’s a little cocky, but that’s about it. It seems like he learned a lot from his USC experience.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 24, 2008 10:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think we should also consider...

some of our picks in the upcoming years, we shouldnt need them in the next few years as we arnt looking to get younger and they should be later picks(if they are not, we have bigger problems than the draft can fix)...maybe the 13th, 2009’s first and a couple 2nd rounders from this year. don’t forget it’s very possible with the trade genie KP that the 13th turns in to like a couple picks earlier with like a Jack trade or a 2nd rounder trade making the fall from 3 to say some where between 6-10 less of a fall for the Twolves.

by Blazermaniac77 on May 24, 2008 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

The Jailblazers were a team wide problem

It would be hard for mayo to be a jailblazer when everybody else on the team is a saint. If he messed up the entire backlash would be on him. Nobody to spread it around too.

by Sabonis4Ever on May 24, 2008 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

Being on the Blazers would probably be the best thing in the world for him too. I’ve always thought that if Z-Bo didn’t come to a team with people like Bonzi and Sheed on it with all their extra-curricular activities, he would have been much better off and not thought that, that’s the way NBA players are supposed to be.

by Blazermaniac77 on May 24, 2008 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I could agree with targeting Mayo

but it will take more to get him. If I were a wolves fan I would probably want Outlaw or Webster, our #13 pick and some cap relief. Let’s just say KP makes a phone call to them and asks about the possibility of acquiring the pick and Minnesota says, “what about the #13 pick, #34 pick Outlaw for our #3 pick and Mark Madsen and McCants?” I think that may be something both sides would consider. Thoughts?

by utblazer on May 24, 2008 9:40 AM PDT reply actions  

Sry utblazer

but i dont think that the wolves would agree to that deal because McCants is on a rise and we arent giving them enough. That deal sounds a little one-sided, but i would love to see it happen. My biggest question though, is do we even want Mayo? He seems to me to be more of a SG, and looking at our current SG (Broy, Webby, and incoming Rudy who we promised PT) i dont think we would have enough room for him. But if he shows the ability to play the PG in workouts i would totally be up for changing my mind and would love to see the Blazers go after him.

by Gregory Roy Aldridge on May 24, 2008 10:23 AM PDT reply actions  

I want Mayo

But they’re going to ask for Zilla. Name a team 3-6 that doesn’t need a starting center? They’ll insist on him but we can’t let him go. He’s too important to the team next year. He takes pressure of Oden and can teach him lots of good stuff and do battle in practice.

by Blazersaurus on May 24, 2008 10:31 AM PDT reply actions  

That would open up minutes for the Buffet

to get more minutes which would be great. The problem is we’d have to take on Antoine Walker’s three remaining years. My original idea was to take advantage of McHale while trying to steer clear of his messes. I know I can’t have my cake and eat it too but…

by bartender77 on May 24, 2008 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not too keen on losing the Pryzbilla either.

Without him, we have no backup center. However, last year, when we still had Zack, we were all convinced that Aldridge could play center. But when this year came around, Frye played center while Aldridge continued at PF. I really don’t think Frye is a good backup center, although he is a good backup PF. If Przybilla was part of that kind of deal, it might be a good idea to either find another center (get another draft pick maybe?) or hope Raef finds the fountain of youth. The former might be more doable. The worst part is that I don’t want to get rid of anyone, but that’s not the way the game it played.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 24, 2008 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

All the more reason...

Not to trade for Mayo. Keep the Pryz baby!

by The Graduate on May 25, 2008 4:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ian Thomsen of CNNSI.com

I can’t remember the radio show that he was on, (maybe Chris Meyers) but Thomsen was insistent that Mayo was going to be a defensive stopper in the NBA. The host was even taken aback when this was suggested and Thomsen said it again. Now I don’t know Thomsen’s track record when talking about prospects, but he should be in the know.

by parkinglotj on May 24, 2008 10:49 AM PDT reply actions  

Not on quick point guards though...

That being said, a good wing defender is enticing.

by The Graduate on May 25, 2008 4:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Martell + Westbrook or Batum or whoever @ 13 >Mayo

Current team + Greg + Rudy = Blazers losing narrowly to the Spurs in the 2008-2009 Western Conference Finals. Book it.

by prezofdeath on May 24, 2008 12:58 PM PDT reply actions  

I think right now, you're right.

We already know what Martell can give us. Mayo is an unknown. The question is though is how many fair-to-middlin’ Small Forwards do we need? Or for that matter, back-up point guards? I really don’t want to trade the team away for Mayo, but if he can be gotten cheap enough, I’d be for it.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 24, 2008 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I like Mayo more than Westbrook

If we can move up by trading Jack, the 13th, and Raef’s contract I would do it in a heartbeat. Maybe even offer Martell.

Mayo/Roy/Rudy easily one of the best guard rotations in the NBA. Our bench could also go small with Travis at the 4 and Frye at the 5.

The thing is I’m not sure we need another talented guard with Rudy coming in.

KP: You know Mike Rice, Mike Barret you've both been very valuable to us this season. But I'd still trade you both for a couple of 2nd round draft picks.

by Dheepan on May 24, 2008 4:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Keep Martell and the big three

But I’d be willing to trade quite a few other assets to get a hold of OJ. He is going to be a stopper and on top of that, how are those speedy PG’s going to stop him? They can’t! He’s too big and strong. Mayo is perfect for our system.

by BlazerD on May 24, 2008 6:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Couldn't agree more

Trade JJ, Outlaw and #13 for Wolves’ #4 and scrubs to make salaries match.

OJ and Roy backcourt with Webster, LMA & Oden up front?? Probably won’t happen.

by LMA on May 27, 2008 4:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

#25

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on May 27, 2008 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

You gotta switch it up on him

Should have said, “That trade won’t work unless you replace Outlaw with LMA.”

Five

by tominhawaii on May 27, 2008 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

#12

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on May 27, 2008 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the advice. I've been thinking of expanding my # repetoire

but needed the nudge.

"Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you." T Darkstar

by annthefan on May 27, 2008 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Chad Ford said...

that Mayo could be in the running for Miami’s pick at #2. Ford seems pretty knowledgable, but is he serious? Beasley or Rose slips to #3?

There would be dancing in the streets in Minnesota!

by parkinglotj on May 24, 2008 7:23 PM PDT reply actions  

chad ford said

that Miami might trade down and get him at 3-5, which is different (but either way we wouldn’t get him).

by kickbrass on May 24, 2008 9:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry

I must have misremembered.

by parkinglotj on May 25, 2008 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

I doubt it

If anything I bet they trade the pick if they decide they don’t like Beasley. Someone will want him. Obviously, if Rose is there at two they take him and not Mayo. It’s looking more and more like Chicago wants Rose. We’ll see.

by BlazerD on May 24, 2008 7:55 PM PDT reply actions  

Who to trade?

I really an uncomfortable in this process, but it has been nagging at me all day. Some time back, someone posted a diary (I think they were still diaries back then) on tiers for our players. I’m going to use something like that. I may change my mind on these players’ positions after next season, but right now, this summer, this is what I think.

1. Absolutely, I do not want to see traded at all
Brandon Roy
Greg Oden
Lamarcus Aldridge.

2. I think trading these guys is a terrible idea:
Travis Outlaw (really did good this past season, he’s a keeper!)
Rudy Fernandez (I don’t want to give up the guy who might be the best player to ever come out of Europe).

3. I really don’t want to trade these guys:
Steve Blake (solid role-player, which are vitally important for good teams)
Joel Przybilla (ditto)

4. I would be somewhat disappointed if these guys got traded:
Martell Webster
Jarrett Jack
Channing Frye

5. Not too worried about:
Sergio Rodriguez (I hate to say that, but…)
Raef LaFrentz
James Jones (Which is too bad, I really like the guy)
Josh McRoberts
Pick #13

I think Mayo could easily be gotten with a level 1 guy, and could be gotten with a level 2 guy and change. But I don’t want to give up any of them at all. And I wouldn’t give up both our level 3 guys, but if we parted with one for a shot at Mayo, I might be able to live with it. I also would not be comfortable giving up all three level 4 guys, but if there were two of them, I think I would be okay. And use whatever level 5 guys are necessary.

Unfortunately, that does not give us much value to work with.

For Minnesota’s Pick, the only way I think we get that is to take Antoine Walker’s hideous contract. It looks like we’d have to give up Przybilla, Jack and the #13 for Walker and the #3. Ouch for us.

I don’t see anything we would be willing to give up that Seattle would want for #4, nor do I see anyone whom Seattle would be willing to dump on us in exchange.

Memphis is kind of in the same boat as Seattle with #5. I’m not sure they’re ready to give up on some of their young talent yet. The only person I could see them wanting to unload is Brian Cardinal, and that’s really only $6M/year for two more years. Would Webster, Jack, McRoberts and the #13 be worth Cardinal and the #5? I’m not sure if this is enough to whet Memphis’ appetite.

The lowest place Mayo could possibly drop to is #6. There’s no guarantee that he would end up here, but New York makes the easiest trading partner. That is if we’re willing to take back some garbage, and they have plenty.

For those out there smart enough to do three team trades, be my guest, but I don’t know how we’d really manage to pull this off, even though I would be ecstatic if we could.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 24, 2008 8:11 PM PDT reply actions  

I agree with the levels

I see marty being in 4 just because Travis has such a awesome year. As for oj, unless he is there with the 13th then he wont be on this team.

by Sabonis4Ever on May 24, 2008 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think if Pritchard likes him, he'll find a way.

I’m thinking that he would potentially (there’s that dang word again!) be a very good fit for us. But I’m not willing to bet the farm on potential we have to pay much for. That’s why I can’t find a scenario that works well, save the #6. But even then, the cost is really high. We would have to give up our cap room in 2009 to get him. Ugh.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 24, 2008 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

We just don't need to take any gambles

Especially until we have seen this team for a year with Oden and Rudy. What else are we going to do in the off season though. Let the trade talk continue.

by Sabonis4Ever on May 24, 2008 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I disagree

I say swing for the fences if it doesn’t touch our core.
I don’t wanna end up like chicago and watch our window to make a big move pass us by (though indeed, their window did get propped open through the lotto).

Besides the big three, I’m willing to trade anyone if KP thinks they are good enough. I mean yeah, we’ve got a great group of guys, but what we are trying to build is a championship team. In my view, if we have a starting lineup of Mayo/Roy/Whoever/LMA/Oden, then we can stock the bench with KP’s smart picks and overseas players.

I would blow the caproom in 09’ for OJ Mayo if KP thought it was a good idea.

As has been discussed before, ‘09 free agency sucks for our needs.

I think Mayo can do everything Blake can do plus everything Jack can do, with better D. I think Mayo can get his own shot, knock down 3’s, play midrange, drive to the hoop, hit free throws, feed the post, defend PG’s and some SG’s, and has a good passing game.

Look, with Roy, LMA,and Oden on the floor, who is going to double Mayo? And since unlike Blake, he is a scoring threat, teams won’t be able to cheat off him. He is a big PG that can play Nate Style and wants to win more than anything. I watched a lot of his college games and he really tried to get his teammates involved. However,there wasn’t a lot of talent on his team and they’d pass it back to him with 4 seconds left and expect him to bail them out.

O.J. Mayo is not a Gilbert Arenas, I think he’d be a great addition to the squad and even if he didn’t mesh he’d be a good trading peice later.

Blazer's fan since '84, Currently exiled in Tennessee and North Carolina

by HurraKane212 on May 25, 2008 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I guess that is it...

I just don’t think Pritchard likes him.

by The Graduate on May 25, 2008 4:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

His Mom

seems like a nice lady. She sounds like she is looking out for him.

If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley

by Winchester on May 26, 2008 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

I like the tiers too

But I would definitely switch Martell and Travis’ positions.

I think Outlaw is on his way out. I just don’t see him getting much playing time once Oden starts playing.

There just aren’t many minutes at the four and I don’t think Travis can guard SFs.

Martell has a much brighter future than Travis IMO.

by BlazerD on May 24, 2008 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Travis can't guard PF's either.

But his offensive game is pretty effective, even if we’re not really sure what he’s doing out there.

Martell is far more streaky. Every player has his ups and downs, but Webster is Mt. Everest to Mariana Trench.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 24, 2008 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree mostly...

I do think that Surgio does have value to NY. I tried to make it work, but Portland would still have to give up Outlaw, the pick and take a contract back. Jeffries or James? I don’t like that much, but if Pritchard thinks that Mayo is perfect, it’s at least possible.

by parkinglotj on May 24, 2008 8:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think we might be stuck with a bigger contract.

Or a couple, if we use Raef. Like I said above, not at all my favorite option.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 24, 2008 8:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would break them into tiers a little differently

Tier 1 (likely all-stars)
Brandon Roy
LaMarcus Aldridge
Greg Oden

Tier 1.5
Rudy Fernandez ( think he will end up in either tier 1 or tier 2, but won’t know which until he plays in the NBA)

Tier 2 (likely starter-level players)
Travis Outlaw
Channing Frye
Martell Webster

Tier 3 (good backups/fringe starters who fit in well with our team)
Steve Blake
James Jones
Joel Przybilla
I think the #13 pick is about as valuable as the players in this tier

Tier 4- Everyone else

I’m not that high on Mayo, I think that he will be a tier 2 level player. Because of this, I wouldn’t want to give up more than a tier 2 player to get him. In fact, I probably wouldn’t even be willing to trade any of our tier 2 players to get him simply because they are already our players and making too many trades would be bad for chemistry.

by trk on May 25, 2008 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

thanks trk

Your divisions make more sense to me. Certainly wouldn’t mind Mayo, but I wouldn’t sell the barn (or even lease out the loft) for him.

by The Graduate on May 25, 2008 4:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

mayo will be good

All I have is stupid fan hunches to go on, but here’s my feeling about Mayo:
He has all of the basketball talent and tools to be really, really good.
He is young and impressionable to team culture and that could take him in either the Kobe (plays for a winner young and learns how to win) route or the Vince Carter route (extremely talented but never really a winner). Based on my read on him, I see him more likely to follow the Kobe path, especially on a team that’s got its ducks in a row administratively like ours. He would be an excellent fit for this team and I think it’s totally unfair that he’s been branded a bad apple, especially for this BDA business.

by kickbrass on May 24, 2008 9:06 PM PDT reply actions  

I have no doubt that he will be good.

That said, I question whether or not he will be good for this team. Plus, I cannot imagine that Portland would be a good fit for him either.

by The Graduate on May 25, 2008 4:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Here's my feeling about Mayo

I want “Mayo on My Blazers”

“He wants to rip your heart out, serve it to you on a plate, and then do it again. The kid is a killer, he’s a total killer on the court. He’ll be a special player." – Mike Procopio

What have The PTB to offer in “The Trade Up to Get Mayo”?
I am willing to give a proven NBA PG w/ po, JJ1, Sergio (screw this needin’ ‘im for Rudy), 13th pick, all our 2nd round picks, Von Wafer, next years 1st round pick, McRob, Money, Take sum crap contracts, and (let’s see what else can I think of to through in here) JJ33.

OK. What not enough? If I gots to go with tradin one of My Favofite Playahs (TO or Marty) I need arrangements for Joe Alexander

"Always Willing, Ever Able" - rivbike.com
"A Dbl Shot O' Whiskey & A Pitcher O' Beearr" - BoilerMaker (It's Game Time Baby, see Ya Again, 'n the Second Half)

by BlueBooYay on May 25, 2008 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

I already have Joe Luv, in ma heart

"Always Willing, Ever Able" - rivbike.com
"A Dbl Shot O' Whiskey & A Pitcher O' Beearr" - BoilerMaker (It's Game Time Baby, see Ya Again, 'n the Second Half)

by BlueBooYay on May 25, 2008 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't dump Martell or put him in "category four"

until we see what he’s got this fall. If he really is already back to work on his game, I’d like to see what he brings to the table. Bear in mind he’s younger than Travis. He went prep-to-pro just a few years ago.

Current team + Greg + Rudy = Blazers losing narrowly to the Spurs in the 2008-2009 Western Conference Finals. Book it.

by prezofdeath on May 24, 2008 11:48 PM PDT reply actions  

Definitely

Martell has tons of talent and is putting in the work to make it happen. Marty is going to be fantastic for us and we’ll all be happy that KP kept him.

by BlazerD on May 25, 2008 12:24 AM PDT reply actions  

I love Mayo, here's my tiers

Tier 1- Roy
LA
Oden

Tier 2- Martel- he’s going to be our T. Prince, or Bowen lock down defender, look for himm to brak out this year.

Joel- Pryz is so important to keeping the pressure off of Greg, and if we were to trade him and Oden got hurt again we would be in some huge trouble.

Tier 3- my tier 3 is just a small fall from two and has less to do with talent and more to do with need.

Outlaw

Rudy

Tier 4- bench players nothing more

Frye- I would be willing to trade Channing, I like him a lot but I feel he’s too similar to LA and his value is good.

Blake- I think he’s a great back up, but if he’s the missing piece to a trade I’d do it

Sergio- I’m not willing to give up on him yet, however if a team wanted him and we could land mayo, we wouldn’t have much use for him.

Jack- I’m sure Jack is gone, however I see him playing better next year no matter which team he is on. If we were to trade Rodriguez and/or Blake there would be no complaints having him on our bench because of his leadership and toughness.

Jones- we can’t trade him and if we don’t trade Webster and don’t trade for Battier he’s perfect part of the 2nd unit.

Tier 5 is everyone else-

Mayo being pared with Roy switching back and forth between the 1 and 2 guards would give this team such stability. Mayo will be the lockdown defender this team could use in the perimeter keeping pressure off Roy’s knees and Oden‘s foul numbers . He’s the tough minded guard that McMillan loves. He has a great B-ball IQ. Mayo will be around good guys and that will help guide his career in the right direction. Mayo is a 1st tier type player on this team.

I am more convinced in Mayo than I am in Rudy, and Rudy will be real good. I would trade Rudy or outlaw straight across for him. However I don’t think we’ll need to. I think KP can tip toe his way down the draft spots couple by couple using Jack or other 4th tier players , 2nd rounders, foreign players, future picks and of course Paul Allen’s money until we can get Mayo.

future Roster

Roy- team captain, crunch time PG, fill in blank
Mayo- One of the best defenders in the league, break out scorer, and guy you least like to piss off because he’ll kill you on the court.
Webster- small forward, lock down defender, 6-8 rebounds a game, good slasher with a great ourside shot
LA- PF one of the best all around PF in the game, next year will have a break out season
Oden- Dwight Howard with a 70% free throw shooting young Shaq offensive skills.

6th man Rudy

by Blazermaniac77 on May 25, 2008 6:14 PM PDT reply actions  

I completely agree

I love Rudy but if that is what it would take I would give him up to get Mayo. Outlaw, Jack, Frye whoever pretty much.

Mayo is gonna be a bigtime player in the NBA.

The league is on notice if we get him and every GM in the game would know it.

by BlazerD on May 25, 2008 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rudy > Mayo

Rudy was much more productive than Mayo against much better competition. He is clearly a much better player at the moment. It might be possible for Mayo to catch up, but I don’t see any reason to think that he will or that he has a higher ceiling.

by trk on May 25, 2008 8:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mayo fits more of a TB need

I think that is completely subjective. I don’t want to take anything away from Rudy and what he has done in Spain is amazing. However what about the Spanish league makes it much better than the NCAA? OJ played against at least 8 NBA ready players in just the Pac 10 this season alone, how many did Rudy play against? I would argue that Mayo fits more of a need in the Blazers roster too.
With all that being said, I think we can get Mayo without trading Rudy. I would probably consider trading Outlaw before Rudy to be honest. With Greg coming on board next season we’ll have Channing move over to backup PF if we keep him and we’ll Martel starting at SF unless we do make a move for Battier, then Martel in the backup. Or we have Jones as the back up SF, I’m not sure where Outlaw fits, no matter how much I like him. Plus right now TO’s stock is so high.

by Blazermaniac77 on May 25, 2008 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

The need is for a guard to play together with Roy

I would argue that Rudy actually fills that role better than Mayo does. Rudy like to play off the ball and is very effective in that role, whereas Mayo seems most comfortable with the ball in his hands. Since Roy also is at his best when handling the ball, Rudy seems like the better fit.

by trk on May 25, 2008 11:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

good points

However unless we want Roy to be the point gaurd Mayo seems to be more NBA ready to handle the point. I also think his defense will be be a huge impact and take some of the pressure off of Roy to gaurd the small faster points in the west. And once again I’m not saying we should trade Rudy, I just think Mayo is a better fit

by Blazermaniac77 on May 26, 2008 12:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mayo is NBA ready?

Compare Mayo’s stats with the stats that Jarrett Jack had during his last year in college. Jack had more assists with fewer turnovers, and had significantly higher percentages in all of his shooting stats. The only area where Mayo did significantly better than Jack was shoot a greater number of lower percentage shots. Additionally, Jack was on a better team that got to the national championship game, whereas Mayo couldn’t get his team past the first round of the NCAA tournament. Mayo’s defense is considered pretty good, but Jarrett Jack was also considered a top notch defender in college. Basically, It doesn’t look like Mayo is even as good of a player as Jack right now, and with our stacked team Jack could end up being squeezed out of the rotation next year. Mayo might be able to make a significant contribution eventually, but he seems a long way away from that point right now.

by trk on May 26, 2008 1:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Have you watched Mayo play?

At all? I mean JJ was the 22nd pick in the draft for all his collegiate resume. Mayo is going to be leaps and bounds superior to Jack.

KP: You know Mike Rice, Mike Barret you've both been very valuable to us this season. But I'd still trade you both for a couple of 2nd round draft picks.

by Dheepan on May 26, 2008 1:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mayo on sucky team

his team didn’t get off shots or when he got off shots it was because he was forced to shoot because his team mates got it back to him just before the bell.

Mayo is better than he made his team look.

He plays lock down defense. He scores, and he passed to sucky team mates trying to get them in the game.

"I got the goose bumps." - Rudy translated by Alamart

by ratbastird on May 26, 2008 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

BooYay !!!

Way to come on, ya Rat!

"Always Willing, Ever Able" - rivbike.com
"A Dbl Shot O' Whiskey & A Pitcher O' Beearr" - BoilerMaker (It's Game Time Baby, see Ya Again, 'n the Second Half)

by BlueBooYay on May 26, 2008 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

The whole stats argument only meens so much

I’ve seen lots of Mayo this year, I watched Jack back then. Jack was a real good College Junior, but he wasn’t OJ Mayo. You can only get so much from stats. and lets not forget Jack has had knee surgery since that final four game.OJ is a complete player who is going to be something special

by Blazermaniac77 on May 26, 2008 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

yes, yes,yes

thank you, that is what i’m talking about!

by bartender77 on May 26, 2008 5:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

A 3 guard rotation of Roy, Mayo and Rudy would be insane!

I’m sure Blake will get minutes for a couple of years but after that we have an unstoppable frontline and backcourt. We could not be beat.

by BlazerD on May 25, 2008 7:31 PM PDT reply actions  

I think it would be a huge mistake to trade Webster. I think he is going

to be the perfect fit for our team and will happily fufill his role. With three players in our lineup that require double coverage Martell is going to be invaluable. With his improving defense and commitment to work on his handle I am confident he is going to be a well rounded player.

Something tells me that if we bring in Mayo we are going to have too many chiefs. We tried that before.

by oderiferous emanations 74 on May 25, 2008 8:22 PM PDT reply actions  

Agree

When you have high school players, you have to give them lots of time. Outlaw and Martell deserve a lil’ extra grace.

Current team + Greg + Rudy = Blazers losing narrowly to the Spurs in the 2008-2009 Western Conference Finals. Book it.

by prezofdeath on May 25, 2008 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

If the bulls are smart

they draft Mayo at number 1.

"I got the goose bumps." - Rudy translated by Alamart

by ratbastird on May 25, 2008 9:26 PM PDT reply actions  

they would get killed for doing that

but I do think he’s the best player coming out…

by Blazermaniac77 on May 25, 2008 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here's hoping they're not smart.

"I got the goose bumps." - Rudy translated by Alamart

by ratbastird on May 26, 2008 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

FINALLY!!

I go on vacation for a while and when I come back I see that people are starting to come around on Mayo now.

Like I have been harping, the off the court problems Mayo have gone through have been miniscule things that have bee nblown out of proportion. Bad decisions? Yes but not things that would not be unheard of a teenager doing.

Jonathan Givony of Draftexpress wrote a while back that Mayo reminded him of Roy and I have seen that comparison out there floating in some of the internet message boards. I could only imagine that we would be able to ffield TWO Brandon Roys, one at SG and the other at PG.
In watching him he is able to beat a press fairly easily, is elite coming off screens and getting a shot off, hits 3s at a 40% clip with good mechanics ans realease point, and can play lockdown D as he did vs. Rose, the guy that supposedly can get by anyone.

He also seems to have a high level of BBIQ and knows when and how to distribute or shoot the ball. Above all, and this is where I think he clearly distinguishes himself from Blake, is he has the feel the “it” as some of the people are saying, to be able to know when to be agressive and get into the lane or when to be passive and pass the ball. I would actually darft Mayo ahead of Rose as he fits our needs better (yes I know BPA BPA BPA but with our big 3 we NEED a shooter.)

by SpyderRyder on May 25, 2008 10:20 PM PDT reply actions  

he IS BPA.

"I got the goose bumps." - Rudy translated by Alamart

by ratbastird on May 26, 2008 10:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Assets and Opportunities

Reading the posts, I’m reminded that Pritchard’s drafts have created opportunity, because for the first time, we have some assets to deal. Add in the cap space which will get larger given LaFrentz’s contract, and this, in some ways, may be the most interesting draft yet. Getting Aldridge and Roy in 2006, then Oden and Fernandez near the bottom in 07 – (and now the word is he’s the best player in Europe right now – which would put him above Gallinari which some project at #6 this year) does that for the Blazers. Most teams have a core of 8 primary players. Three on the front line, three at guard, and two at SF, of which several can play two positons. The others are role players getting fewer minutes. On the front line, we have Oden and Aldridge, and Pryzbilla or Frye to back them up. At SF, we have Webster, Outlaw (who will no longer get minutes at PF), and Jones. At Guard, we have Roy, Fernandez, Blake, Jack and Segio. Now, if you draft someone you think will help you, whether at PG or SF, then you will have to find minutes for that rookie as well. If PG, you’d have Roy getting 35 minutes, which leaves only 63 for the other players. Rodriquez is gone in any case, but you’d still have 4 players – Fernandez, the new Rookie, and Blake and Jack splitting up the other 63. Which means you’re certain to trade either Blake or Jack – and even then you’d still have three players averaging 21 minutes. Or, one would be down in the 10 – 15 minute range – where Serio was this year – and I can’t see any of these three wanting to be here if that’s the role they end up with. And, if you draft a SF, Jones is almost certainly gone, yet you’d still have the Rookie, Outlaw and Webster trying to divide up 48 minutes – yet your really only need two and one insurance player – and I don’t see Webster or Outlaw wanting to be an insurance player getting 5 – 10 minutes a game. On the front line, we see the same thing. Oden and Aldridge are likely 30 – 35 minute or so guys, which means that Frye and Pryzbilla need to be happy with 10 – 15 minutes – and I’m not sure that’s how they see themselves. Every position has one or more players that – for the right deal and the right player – could be traded. No wonder Pritchard is reported to handle up to 200 messages a day. He needs to. And, for those that want a high draft PG – he and McMillan have the additional headache of having two rookes – both needing to play – in the guard rotation at the same time. Meaning, they’d have to convince Blake or Jack to hang around and mentor them, even though they’d know that they were being downgraded to the insurances role. It would be easier if they could trade for a good and competent veteran – but that’s easier said than done – and interferes with cap space.

by Eben Calder on May 26, 2008 8:29 AM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Excellent insight.

I’m not as worried about them being happy with their roles. If we upgrade our roster and some players don’t get to play much at all, then I’m okay with that. I know, I really like them and all, but if they can’t get playing time behind better players, If Steve Blake can only earn 10 minutes of playing time behind Roy, Rudy and (if possible, as this diary is about) Mayo, then that’s okay. And if Jack doesn’t get any after that, then that’s okay too. That means the players that are playing are better than they are. The problem recently, and the reason so many players have been getting around 20 minutes is that there really isn’t that big of difference in talent between them. Pritchard has a history of being active, and I think there is room to improve this team, especially with the assets we have.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 26, 2008 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Minnesota has the #3 pick not the 4th

Seattle has the #4 pick. Don’t know if that makes a huge difference, but at the top of the lottery, moving up one spot is more significant than later picks in the draft. In other words, you may have to factor in giving more value to Minnesota for the #3 than if they had the #4.

by JasonT on May 26, 2008 9:11 AM PDT reply actions  

Mayo

He would be a great pickup if possible. He and Roy on the perimeter would be devastating.

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on May 26, 2008 1:10 PM PDT reply actions  

Doing reconnaissance.

I asked around at our sister-site Canis Hoopus to get a ‘Sota’s fan perspective on trading for the #3.

Site owner Stop-and-Pop said the following:

I think Portland…
...would be an interesting trade destination. I don’t know if the expiring contracts would get it done. The Wolves have more than just a personnel problem, they have a public relations one as well. During one game late in the season, their TV broadcast drew only 1700 viewers. If you combine that with season tickets being sold for $3/game and a laundry list of poor draft decisions in the past (and to say nothing of the local fan base’s outburst of support for a Mayo pick), you have a situation where the club would need something a bit more flashy than a sensible move that would allow them to clear out dead weight on the roster while moving down and putting them in position to draft a solid wing player like CDR, Alexander, or Budinger.

Furthermore, it would be hard to improve on the leverage that the Wolves have with Miami or Seattle. If Miami wants Mayo or the Sonics…whoever…they have to play ball with the Wolves. Plus…trading to a division rival with a roster like that…well, that’s a recipe for long term pain as far as the Wolves are concerned.

If I were to put forward the best-case trade scenario for what it would take for the Wolves to deal with Portland, it would start with Rudy Fernandez (provided he would guarantee his playing here next year or the year after) and the expiring contracts. There has to be an additional player in there if the Wolves are going to hand an in-division rival their point guard of the future to match up with Roy and Oden. It can’t be the kid from Finland…Fernandez would have to be involved in some way, shape, or form…as well as the 13th pick. They’re getting Mayo or Beasley one way or the other and it will take a pretty decent offer from a team that high (and in the division) to change that.

Thought I would share.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 26, 2008 5:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Thanks for doing that

I like seeing what other teams’ fans think of rumours and ideas as well, as they always see and know things about their players and their team’s situation that we just don’t know.

I know it is obvious, and likely doubly obvious to Minny fans, but a lot of their problems could be solved by firing McHale and hiring a real GM. It’s almost too easy. He has never made the right draft pick since Kevin Garnett. The CLIPPERS have a better track record in the lottery for Paul Bunyon’s sake.

I’d put Rudy in the untouchables list for now, because of the work KP and Friends put in to get him to come over, plus I wouldn’t be surprised if Rudy decided to stay in Spain if we just went ahead and traded the rights to him anyways. Talk about silly sauce.

I hope for Minny fans’ sake that McHale goes against his instincts and does not draft Brook Lopez. He has “top 3 Minnesota T-Wolves Bust” written all over him, but he might be able to shake the label if he slips a bit.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on May 27, 2008 4:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

Another problem...

...is that the Wolves are starting to get an eye for Kevin Love. If they do pull a trade, they’ll need a pick in the top 5 or 6 to get their guy. Memphis will probably be the likely trading partner as they have a glut of point guards that could be packaged…as well as a late 1st.

Portland would really have to melt McHale’s face off with a great offer for them to move down that far. McHale has said that they have 8 players that would fit the squad. He’s been tied to Mayo, Love, Alexander, Beasley, Rose, and Lopez. Those players aren’t going to be around at 13 and it is unlikely that the other 2 will be there as well. It would have to be a hell of an offer for them to move down that far.

In the end, I think the Wolves will overplay their hand and end up drafting Love with the 3rd pick. They’ll then try to move up into the mid-1st to grab a big wing player that can guard the 2 or 3 and/or an athletic big that can guard 4s that give Jefferson trouble. If they can pull off a 3 player haul with these types of players, I think it will be a good day at the office. Foye, CDR, Love, Jefferson, and a center like Jason Thompson would be an interesting starting 5. They’d have 2 undersized power fowards with old style games surrounded by big guards and a very athletic center. The matchup issues with that sort of lineup could go both ways I suppose.

by Stop-n-Pop on May 30, 2008 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks

It is kinda like a splash o’ cold water in the face.

"Always Willing, Ever Able" - rivbike.com
"A Dbl Shot O' Whiskey & A Pitcher O' Beearr" - BoilerMaker (It's Game Time Baby, see Ya Again, 'n the Second Half)

by BlueBooYay on May 26, 2008 6:06 PM PDT reply actions  

I'd rather have Mayo than Rudy

But I think a deal can be done to get Mayo here without giving up Rudy. I’d give up Joel before I gave up Rudy though.

How about Joel, Outlaw, #13 (I’d even throw in a couple of future firsts)
for
#3, Walker (we’re going to have to take a bad contract)

I think Minny would be interested in Channing too (he’d be a great fit with Jefferson) but I’d like to keep him.

by BlazerD on May 26, 2008 6:26 PM PDT reply actions  

I'm apparently not as high on Mayo as you are.

And I’ve found that in the last few days, I like him a lot. Howeverr, I’m not crazy about giving up that much talent and taking back Antoine Walker’s horrible contract. Not Przybilla and Outlaw. We already know what they give us, and it’s pretty darn good. If we gave up that much, I’d want more value back than the #3 and 2011’s expiring contract of the year. Besides, AnntheFan will be here any minute to #25 you.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 26, 2008 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep.

#25

"We comin along." Travis Outlaw

by annthefan on May 26, 2008 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

That would probably be too many players...

...the Wolves have 3 picks this year, 2-4 next year, and they will have free agent money to spend after next season. I also think they like Love and/or Mayo better than any player they would get in return for that package.

by Stop-n-Pop on May 30, 2008 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's fine

But I think Annethefan is going to be freaking out soon anyways. I really do think Travis is one his way out this summer. I’ll be surprised if he’s not.

With Rudy coming his scoring off the bench isn’t as important. Especially if you have Mayo on the bench this year. We’ll have plenty of scoring and shooting off the bench and I think all of those guys can play team basketball which Travis barely can if you want to be generous.

by BlazerD on May 26, 2008 7:19 PM PDT reply actions  

Unfortunately I think you're right.

We have Frye backing up the PF, Joel backing up Greg, and Jones backing up Martel unless one of those guys are traded where is T.O. going to get his minutes? Plus his trade value may not be higher… I don’t want to see him go, but I could see it happening and if we could snag Mayo for him I would be all in.

by Blazermaniac77 on May 26, 2008 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Outlaw is traded

We’re all going to have to be here for annthefan. A little bubbly and some quality time with friends, would get her though it. Outlaw somewhere else certainly would be bitter sweet.

by parkinglotj on May 26, 2008 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I hope I don't offend any Mayo-lovers,

but I personally see Mayo as a Damon Stoudamire.

Win rookie of the year, have a fairly solid career, but never live up to potential. A career spotted with personal issues (potentially the same down to marijuana charges).

Current team + Greg + Rudy = Blazers losing narrowly to the Spurs in the 2008-2009 Western Conference Finals. Book it.

by prezofdeath on May 26, 2008 9:48 PM PDT reply actions  

I think Rudy has a good chance of winning the ROY as well

Regardless, there seem to be a bunch of players that are more NBA ready than Mayo (Oden, Rudy, Rose, Beasley, Love, etc), so his chances of Mayo winning the ROY award seem pretty slim.

by trk on May 26, 2008 11:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

who cares if Mayo wins it?

what does that prove, he’s going to be great.

by Blazermaniac77 on May 27, 2008 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mayo vs. Damon

Being 6’5” instead of 5’11, Mayo has a much higher ceiling than Damon ever did

by tingeyga on May 27, 2008 9:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

My ceiling is about 6'11"

So I don’t think I should ever invite Oden or Pryzbilla over for dinner.

by pualo on May 28, 2008 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

True

Ceiling doesn’t equal height, but everything else being equal, you would take the bigger player every time though right?

by tingeyga on May 29, 2008 12:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nothing against Mayo or Mayo fans but he's got character questions

And we don’t have time for character questions right now.

Blazer Fan

by leeroyjenkins on May 27, 2008 9:59 AM PDT reply actions  

not a fan of mayo-naise

They lost to Kansas State in Mayo’s biggest game in his life. USC had a much better team than K-state, and should never have been ranked so low if Mayo was as good as people say. USC finished the previous season ranked 15th or something. With Mayo, they were not even ranked at the end. I believe there is much to be said about that.

by clonigro on May 27, 2008 11:14 AM PDT reply actions  

We don't need another 'Big Shot'

People…remember Avery Johnson, Steve Kerr, Dennis Johnson (the 80’s), Derek Fisher. All of the people listed are PG and they all won a champinship ring but none of them are All Stars or a Big shot.

The Blazers have their three core players in Roy, LA and Oden. So all we need are decent role players and I believe we are very close in filling every positions we need for a Championship run. But we don’t need a Baron Davis who is an All Star and we don’t need the heavy contract of a Kirk H. He is not THAT much of an upgrade from Blake or JJ. Why spend the money? And we certainly don’t need Mayo. He seems like he would want the spot light on him all the time and that mentality doesn’t fit with the chemistry of the team.

The ONLY ingredient that the Blazers need now are time and experience. I have a very strong feeling that JJ will out play Blake for the starting position next year. His motivation will be his close friend Chris Paul. He want to be just as good as CP3 and will bust his butt this off season to improve all aspect of his game.

KP-Don’t make a move to get ride of JJ, Blake, Webster, Frye and especially Outlaw. Please draft the best player available even if it means K. Love. Let this team marinate and you will have a ring on your finger in a couple of years. That is the recipe for sucess. Myhumbleopinion…

by kungfukid on May 29, 2008 3:54 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Hard to be a fan of a team that is so poorly managed.
Cs-sj_053_small
10 Years of 1st Round Blazer Draft Picks
Small
Draft Drawer: Pre-Lotto
Small
Trade Drawer: The Big 5?
Kpavatar2_small
Not 5, not 6, not 7, not EVER - Junk with Heat poll

Recent FanPosts

Small
Drummond, Lamb, Machado
Dsc01448_small
GM History
Small
What will be the future of our Blazers. Just a few seasons ago, the Blazers were going to be the OKC of the NBA but injuries to Roy and Oden crippled our dreams of a young championship contender for years and years.
Small
Beal and Marshall!!!
Small
Batum: "It could be worse then Portland"
Albert-einstein-funny-face-gel-coated-textured-art_small
Playoffs: Whiners Not Winners
H_small
B-Roy as player development coach?
Small
Brent Barry for GM
Duck_pot_small
Thing COULD be worse...
Irish_small
Anyone play Draft$treet?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Maybe this is what we need to succeed...
Quick: Stern Says Blazers Not For Sale; More GM Interviews Coming
Freeman: Blazers Want To Bring Over Joel Freeland, Victor Claver

Recent FanShots

Colonel Rondo and his second round armada? 

If Boston is determine to rebuild and cut salary isn’t two mid lotto pics and the right salary filler decent. Maybe not enough but better than what most teams get in that situation.  I would prefer that over the Chris Paul package.

I hope and figure that the Trail Blazers could have the best of both worlds. I’ve never seen a more bountiful 2nd round. Its conceivable that the team could deal both lotto picks and still find some nice players in the draft.  Players like Orlando Johnson, Lucas Nogueira, Kevin Jones, Will Barton are 1st rounders in most drafts even if its just based on hype and potential. Then you have some possible gems in such a deep draft like Machado, a couple guys that I personally like from Georgetown-their center Henry Sims and forward Hollis Tompson.  Both high upside players that I would love to watch in the summer league.  If PA were to ever buy into or trade into late first or second round now is the time. Give me Freeland, Diebler and four second rounders in the summer league with Rondo coaching.
Orlando Magic Fire Coach Stan Van Gundy
Terry "Versatility" Porter
OT: The (New) San Francisco Warriors
Still tear up every time I see a highlight of this guy... He literally meant the world to Blazer...
Hibbert talks loyalty towards Pacers
This is going to be a great game. Granger vs. James
Teaford: Blazers Still Haven't Contacted Lakers Regarding GM Kupchak
The Onion - Heat Lose Chris Bosh Indefinitely To Severe Poetic Justice
Go big or go home...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm