Interesting sign and trade..
I'm sure there have been some Baron Davis talk in here before but with the recent news on the ESPN.com/rumor central page, I thought I would start it again. Turns out Baron and the Warriors are miles apart in contract negotiations and as a result he just might opt out of the final year of his contract. Which leads me to this sign and trade proposal.
Blazers receive: Baron Davis- 17 mil
Warriors receive: Raef LaFrentz- 12 mil, Travis Outlaw- 4 mil, Jarrett Jack- 2 mil, Sergio Rodriguez- 1 mil and our 1st and 2nd rd picks.
Not only do the salaries match but all of those players in my opinion fit the Warriors system so I wouldn't see them turning this down. As for us, check out next years lineup:
C Oden/Pryzbilla
PF Aldridge/Frye
SF Webster/Jones
SG Roy/Fernandez
PG Davis/Blake
Roy and Davis would basically be unstopable up top, then you got the twin towers down low, all while Webster is getting wide open looks for 3's. The bench is solid still as well. What does everyone think?
0 recs |
57
comments
Comments
I think...
If Baron Davis stays healthy and Oden is for real, we could be the best team in the league.
Baron Davis killed Devin Harris in the playoffs last year. Every quick PG that would hurt us in the playoffs is basically canceled out by having him on the team, much like what Tony Parker is doing to Chris Paul. I can’t guard you, but you can’t guard me. I don’t know if Golden State would do it, but I love this trade. Plus Baron would make Paul Allen tons of money. He might be the most entertaining player in the game.
I would miss Outlaw, couldn’t we trade Webster or Frye instead? Davis and Blake are both great shooters so we wouldn’t miss Webster or Jones too much. I think Outlaw causes a lot of missmatches that are really going to shine in a seven game series.
If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley
by Winchester on May 13, 2008 5:20 PM PDT 0 recs
Then with that logic wouldn't Calderon
be suitable, cheaper, younger substitute? If you are trying to make the PG situatio a zero-sim game, Calderon would be a younger, cheaper option than Boom Dizzle.
I think it would be interesting to say the least, but it may not work with him and Roy. Calderon seems to be VERY team oriented and all interviews I have heard him, its kinda annoying how much he talks about what is good for the team, what it is going to take ti win. Granted I like all that stuff but watching his interviews is a little like having too much sweets, plus he has this wierd thing he does with his mouth, he purses his lips a lot which I thought was kinda wierd, ohhh those CrAzY sPaNiArDs!!!
by SpyderRyder on
May 14, 2008 12:01 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I like the trade
but we’d have to sign him to a reasonable contract.
I prefer trading Outlaw to Webster, so I’m good with that.
We don’t need to add that many picks, keep the 2nd rounders..
by Falcao on May 13, 2008 5:26 PM PDT 0 recs
Your trade idea is denied, Odenied
Davis is owed nearly $18 mil next season. I don’t know what he wants for an extension, but I’ll bet it’s not a decrease in pay.
His age (29) is fine, but I’m not convinced he can stay injury-free, despite playing in every game this season.
I was unimpressed with how his moodiness negatively affected his play late in the season.
If you bring him on-board, kiss Nate goodbye. If Davis couldn’t get along with Mike Montgomery, he and Nate will be like oil and water.
Finally, do you think Davis will defer to Brandon Roy? Not likely.
by MiledAnimal on May 13, 2008 5:29 PM PDT 0 recs
OK,
don’t freak out when I say this, but why in the world would Davis defer to Roy? This may come as a shock, but Baron Davis is better than Roy (when he’s healthy). In a couple years it might be a different story, but right now Davis has the edge.
Both of them have injury concerns, so that is pretty much a wash for me.
If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley
by Winchester on
May 13, 2008 5:38 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think Miled is saying
Baron would upset the apple cart a bit because Roy is the franchise right now. It may be Oden or LMA in a few years but he is the team leader right now. What kind of effect would Baron have on the Blazers chemistry. He wasn’t too pleased that Roy was picked by the coaches over him for the All star game.
I also don’t like giving up both Jack and Sergio. It would be nice to have some continuity at the PG position even though you would be getting an All-Star.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
by tssbro on
May 13, 2008 9:39 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Saying Baron Davis is better than Roy
is open to considerable argument. His per game points are a bit higher, but not significantly so. Rebounding is the same. Davis has more assists per game, but then he is a point guard, which Roy isn’t, exactly. But when you check out FG and 3PT percentages, you find Brandon is the better shooter. Now I’m biased, so the fact I’d pick Brandon for my team ahead of Davis doesn’t mean a lot. The fact that the Coach of the All-Star team picked him ahead of Davis does mean something.
by timg56 on
May 14, 2008 8:18 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Not exactly.
They already had a PG on the all star team. And there was some bad blood from when he left the NOH.
If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley
by Winchester on
May 14, 2008 12:33 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Ann the Fan is likely to #25 you for this.
That, and I’m not sure he mixes in well with KP’s yogurt cultures.
One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season
"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus
by T Darkstar on May 13, 2008 5:30 PM PDT 0 recs
Does the trade include Alba?
"Reality is for people who can't handle Blazers Edge." - MiledAnimal
by tominhawaii on May 13, 2008 5:33 PM PDT 0 recs
Now you got me thinking...
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
by tssbro on
May 13, 2008 9:39 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think Alba is un-obtainable
without giving up one of the big three.
Sorry LaMarcus, you gots to go to clear room the Jessica.
by SpyderRyder on
May 13, 2008 11:48 PM PDT
up
0 recs
If I had the big three to give up for her...
hmmm…
I should probably check with my girlfriend first. I’m not sure how she feels about Alba… they both have the same first name too. That could get confusing.
Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!
by ratbastird on
May 14, 2008 10:50 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I have been mulling this over for a while
Last year I made a proposal to get Jason Terry (glad we didn’t get him) and Boom Dizzle. I agree with the culture part. You really have to be careful since this dude is a veteran. The younger guys are going to look to him for guidance. Is he the leader we want on this team? Would he be able to take backseat to Roy? This is Roy’s team….I don’t know if Boom could humble himself and defer to the young gun who beat him out for All-Star weekend.
If he stays healthy and if he morphed to fit our culture, yah—-Boom’s a winner.
It's a WAR, and we're bringin' the BOOM!
by prezofdeath on May 13, 2008 6:10 PM PDT 0 recs
if it was a sighn and trade
how much money would we sighn him for, it seems like staying with his 17 mil might be a bit much, or would he not opt out of his contract at all if he were traded here?
by raging WebTed on May 13, 2008 6:25 PM PDT 0 recs
i woudnt do it
no player over 30 because if we give him a 5 year deal or so his knees and back problems will be critical and we cudnt get him off our books so i say no take d harris
Oden...Aldridge...Roy.....THE REAL BIG THREE
Watch my brandon roy vid http://youtube.com/watch?v=RC3Byp4ID1E
by CroRupt on May 13, 2008 6:59 PM PDT 0 recs
Golden State
Why would Golden State ever do a deal that got them two young point guards to play behind the All-Star caliber young point guard they already have? I just don’t see any reason that they would make this deal especially since they would only have him for one more year anyways and they’ll have to pay Raef’s huge contract if they made this deal anyways. What are they gaining?
by clydeshairline on May 13, 2008 7:04 PM PDT 0 recs
#25 and in this case #1, #9 and #11
"We comin along." Travis Outlaw
by annthefan on May 13, 2008 7:21 PM PDT 0 recs
What the HELL does that mean?
"You don't live by the jumpshot, you die by the jumpshot." ---Charles Barkley, 2/7/08
by timbo on
May 16, 2008 8:23 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Warriors receive: Raef LaFrentz- 12 mil, Travis Outlaw- 4 mil, Jarrett Jack- 2 mil, Sergio Rodriguez-
Their jersey #’s crankypants.
"We comin along." Travis Outlaw
by annthefan on
May 16, 2008 6:15 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Amen Ann
I wouldn’t do this trade under any circumstances. Outlaw alone is worth Baron Davis. Davis is a smug little jerk. Bad culture. And he ain’t got no unrealized potential. Heck I wouldn’t give up a ham sandwich for him, not even an indicted ham sandwich.
Where have all the flowers gone?
by bilingual octopus on May 13, 2008 7:54 PM PDT 0 recs
Really?
Smug little jerk? Do you know him? What in the world are you talking about?
If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley
by Winchester on
May 13, 2008 7:59 PM PDT
up
0 recs
All that and injury prone
I don’t think
"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and miss" Robert A. Heinlein
by 92wastheyear on
May 13, 2008 7:59 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Scuze me
I should have said that Outlaw alone is worth WAAAYY more than Baron Drizzle or whatever his cheesy nickname is.
How ‘bout this: trade Sergio straight up for B Fizzle. That way we’ll at least get rid of one cheeseball nickname while we’re acquiring another.
Where have all the flowers gone?
by bilingual octopus on
May 13, 2008 8:01 PM PDT
up
0 recs
No way.
Outlaw is worth more than Davis? You seem a little irrational, I can only imagine how painful it must be to listen to your views on politics.
If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley
by Winchester on May 13, 2008 8:49 PM PDT 0 recs
Would it blow your mind
If he actually had the same exact views as you?
"Reality is for people who can't handle Blazers Edge." - MiledAnimal
by tominhawaii on
May 13, 2008 9:18 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I think you guys have spent too long standing out in the drizzle.
(I know I have. Damn global warming. It’s causing all this long cold, wet weather.)
by timg56 on
May 14, 2008 8:22 AM PDT
up
0 recs
My wife hates soda because of the fizzle
Currently, we have Vog. Have you ever heard of it? I thought all the local weathermen were small kine dumb when I first heard them saying it. I thought they were mispronouncing “smog.”
PS. I like Davis, just don’t think he’s a good fit for our team.
"Reality is for people who can't handle Blazers Edge." - MiledAnimal
by tominhawaii on
May 14, 2008 10:56 AM PDT
up
0 recs
who would lead the team in shot attempts
if baron davis was on the team? uh, it would be probably be baron davis. he would also lead the team in 3 pt attempts, assists, time spent dribbling the ball, and since he’s extremely media-friendly and has a sense of humor, he would become the face of the franchise. “baron davis and the portland trailblazers.”
he can dominate a game, just as allen iversen can, but like iversen, he takes an awful lot of bad shots. he’s also been frequently hurt.
so i pass.
ignacio
by ignacio on May 13, 2008 9:20 PM PDT 0 recs
I like Boom Dizzle.
He has a huge personality and presence, and when healthy he’s one of the best guards in the league.
Problem is he’s rarely healthy, and he’s a chucker. I don’t think we need to have a chucker at the PG position. We need someone who can play within the system and play good defense. KP/Nate aren’t building a showtime roster, they’re building a contender. Boom Dizzle is all sizzle and no steak …
by bfan on May 13, 2008 10:46 PM PDT 0 recs
yes
please
If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley
by Winchester on
May 14, 2008 2:58 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Anybody notice the utility pole in the background with the wireless antenna?
No, probably not.
by timg56 on
May 14, 2008 8:27 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Baron Davis is very talented
But haven’t we seen him quit on his team at least TWICE this past season, when they played us? He does that quite a bit actually. He could be a lot, lot better if he played up to his full potential consistently. If we got him, he would take the ball away from Roy, LMA, and make the game about him—he would be the most talented player for now, so you couldn’t argue against it. But just like Z-Bo was the most talented, it doesn’t mean it’s the best for the team and for the future (not that Baron is a Z-Bo, but would have a similar effect).
Renting Baron Davis for a few seasons and taking the team away from our core doesn’t make much sense to me. If Baron had a better attitude, would be willing to take less money, and be able to step aside once he starts to slow down, then sure. However, he wouldn’t be Baron Davis anymore.
Baron has great numbers, but he’s a chucker, a ball hog, and doesn’t always want to play. And when he quits, even Warriors fans hate him. I get angry at him for Warriors fans, because they love him and gave him a second chance after he quite on the Hornets… it’s just how he is.
He’s Hollywood, baby! He’s from LA, went to school in Santa Monica, I dunno if he’d wanna be in Portland even if it gave him a chance to win. He might care when its prime time, but over a season he ain’t a winner. There’s no reason he couldn’t be considered up there with Nash, Paul, whoever your top PGs are. Unfortunately, his attitude and quittyness gets in his way.
We might not get someone as talented as him, but we can get someone who is a better fit. I’d even rather stick with Blake and Jack over Baron. Some guys are so talented that you just have to make the team suit and cater to that player… but it doesn’t make your team better. Baron is one of those dudes.
Plus, like someone else mentioned, the Dubs don’t save much by doing this and Outlaw isn’t enough to do the deal. They can let Baron’s deal expire, so the Raef contract doesn’t help. #13 in the lottery is nice, but probably not what they think will get them equal value.
The Dubs also need a PG, because without Baron they don’t have a starting PG. Monta is only a shooting guard in a PGs body; he’s not a very good dribbler and isn’t a playmaker. He’s exciting, but not a PG. I’d imagine they’d want a replacement of some sort.
We also don’t want to win the chance to overpay Baron as he enters his injury plagued 30s. Yeah, I know he isn’t 30 yet and just played 82 games, but it was pretty much a contract year and if his 20s were injury plagued I doubt his 30s will be much better. Steve Nash is the only guy I can think of who was injury plagued in his 20s and became an iron man in his 30s, but he sold his soul to a nice version of the Devil or sumthin’... because he’s nice and cool and all, so it couldn’t be the real Devil, but he did something with his soul to heal his body up so nice. It a crazy world, yo.
This is an interesting, thought provoking idea that I hadn’t seen many suggest, so I like it. In a perfect world, it’d be sweet. Unfortunately for Baron, Baron is Baron and Baron makes things harder for Baron then they need to be.
I wish my name was Baron :-(
Mortimer
by Mortimer on May 14, 2008 12:29 AM PDT 0 recs
If they are gonna lose him, why would they expect equal value?
I would argue that the smartest thing the Warriors could do would be to get anything they can rather than let B.Davis walk.
Especially if:
1. They get a sizeable chunk of cap space that they will still be able to clear.
2. Fill a couple of “depth” NEEDS like PG and C
3. Can get a First Round Pick out of a departing, unhappy player that is going to walk
4. Potentially can add some 2nd round prospecting picks into the mix.
Yes, all four of those “values” in exchange for a dude that wants to leave your franchise high and dry. Mortimer, I would urge you to reconsider what “value” the Warriors are “expecting” to get out this already bad situation. They can make lemonade out of $#!%.
Please see my plan below that preserves Outlaw with the Blazers…
by Portland Dynasty on
May 14, 2008 8:50 AM PDT
up
0 recs
No Way I would do it if we have to dump Outlaw...
First of all, check out this article from a Bay Area on-line newspaper:
http://www.insidebayarea.com/ci_9231691
If B.Davis is going to opt out and become a free agent by July 1st, 2008 why would we need to trade to acquire him?
Unlike other B-edgers, I feel that the only position we need to shore up is PG. What I am saying is that Martell Webster and Travis Outlaw are our SF/F’s of the future and present. If we traded Outlaw we would need and combo-forward to come in and be a major part of our rotation. I would much rather give up Channing Frye, JJack, Raef’s contract and next years 1st rounder and a few of 2008’s 2nd rounders. Channing can run with them and they need big men. JJack can play with or behind Monta Ellis and we would keep our last 1st round lottery pick for a long while by trading next years #1 instead.
Heck, if the Warriors are going to lose B.Davis to free agency anyways, why not do this? They gain Jack who is a great team mate (much better than Davis’s history) and can score off the bench, a first round next year and quality young running big-man in Frye. (2) 2008 2nd rounders to add International prospects on top of that.
The Blazers get B.Davis and retain Sergio so we can keep developing him. With this years #13 pick we could much more easily replace Channing Frye (with like KEVIN LOVE at back-up FC) than find the PG of our dreams at that point in the draft. And we keep our Outlaw-factor… man his dunks and blocks are momentum shifters!!!!
Outcome…
Warriors:
PG M.Ellis/J.Jack
SG M.Pietrus/M.Belinelli
SF S.Jackson/M.Barnes
PF Al Harrington/B.Wright
FC A.Beidrins/C.Frye
Blazers:
PG B.Davis/S.Blake/S.Rodriguez
SG B.Roy/R.Fernandez
SF M.Webster/T.Outlaw/J.Jones
PF L.Aldridge/#13 pick
FC G.Oden/J.Pryzbilla
I would do it like that and RealGM.com trade checker checks out on this one too!
by Portland Dynasty on May 14, 2008 8:43 AM PDT 0 recs
Do you think he'll opt out though?
It seems to me like a bargaining ploy. No one else will pay him 18 million for 1 season, and he’ll struggle to find someone, ANYONE, willing to pay him 10 million. He is a great player but he doesn’t have the greatest reputation; his rep will likely prevent him from being a Blazer anytime soon as well.
On Golden State’s end, they know Baron doesn’t have many options. If he walks away from 18 million, he’s a dang foolazoid. Him being hurt by their offers are just bargaining ploys, I bet. He tried the same stuff last off-season, threatening to sit out and all that. The Warriors called his bluff, he has nowhere else to turn, and couldn’t leverage his great playoffs into a big new contract. After how he ended this past season, he doesn’t have much more leverage.
Golden State will likely offer a 2, 3 year deal that will be a serious paycut. Baron will have to accept it. I don’t think Golden State is worried about losing Baron, and if they do they can say Hellloooo savings! They don’t got a lot of money as a franchise and wouldn’t necessarily mind the savings.
If things get worse between Baron and the Dubs, sure, they might just try to get sumthin’. Baron just isn’t TrailBlazer material though, for the same reasons a guard of his talent is struggling to get a new contract now that he’s gonna turn 30. Also, the same reasons Roy was selected to the allstar game over Baron. In a perfect world Baron would be awesome for us, but if he played as he should he wouldn’t be available. He COULD be the best PG in the game, but from what I’ve seen he just doesn’t care that much.
Also, if Baron can’t get a new deal, he’ll just take his 18 million and either be traded as an expiring deal by the Warriors after a half season of subpar, inattentive, annoyed-he-didn’t-get-a-deal play, or the Warriors take the cap savings and use it on Monta and Beidrins. I ain’t a expert though.
Aside from his talent, why do you think he’d be a good fit? His personality and attitude seem like the opposite of what we want in our best player.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
May 14, 2008 11:06 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Free Agency and a Players Legacy...
Which team does Baron Davis feel he will ultimately have the most success? Still to be determined.
But, it is worth discussing. Money is sweet. And walking away from a big pay-day is a tough thing to do… unless it is because you believe you will win one or more NBA Championships and that will mean way more for your career and your pride than a few more measley millions. Baron Davis is 29 and he is seeing NBA vets all over the league scrambling to to be moved to teams that have a better shot than their current team to position their careers for that elusive RING! Why wouldn’t a guy consider this? He has too.
Especially if Baron and his agent expect a weaker 2 or 3 year deal as the only thing the Warriors are willing to give. A legit championship shot is worth way more than sticking around for a year and 18 million. Dude is already rich, after being a pro hooper for 8 seasons.
I think his bad attitude is over-hyped. His team mates love him and I personally have always been a fan of his since I love watching UCLA hoops too. KP has been talking about “aging” our team a little bit and Davis would fit the role of “Vet” that he is looking for. Plus, he has had play-off success which is another way he fits our team. Baron Davis COULD be one of the top 3-4 PG’s in the NBA, and that alone fits our need for a PG. He wouldn’t come into a team where he is expected to be the leader or superstar… like his role in Golden State. Davis would come in and be expected to be a key component of a championship squad, playing for the Sarge (Coach Nate) and not Nellie (Coach Nelson). B.Roy is the emotional steady hand of this team. Oden is the superstar to be, and the trio of Roy/LMA/Oden are the focal point of our future. If Baron Davis came in and was simply allowed to play and be part of this team rather than being used as an “example” like Nellie did to him in the playoffs and not be made to feel that his game was what ultimately ended GS’s run that year (when he should have been brought back into the game after a rest, rather than being benched the whole time). Davis’ attitude toward Nellie should be scarred. Many other players feel the same way…
I think much too much is made of Baron Davis’ so-called bad-attitude…. Read this article:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/16/SPNF1068B3.DTL
Regarding Players working with Nellie: (from Wikipedia.com)
“After four winning seasons, he left Golden State due to ongoing disputes with Webber and a 14-31 start.”
“In 1995, Nelson would begin his stint with the Knicks, which lasted from July 1995 until March 1996. Despite coaching the Knicks to a respectable 34-25 record, Nelson had many personal problems with the players…”
Do I believe what the media feeds me… NO, that is why I blog. Do I think Davis is a bad-seed? NO, he helped make Stephen Jackson a good team mate and player. Do I think Davis would thrive in a much better situation where all the pressure wasn’t on his shoulders… YES absolutely.
by Portland Dynasty on
May 14, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Mortimer... I forgot to mention he brings CONFIDENCE to the team...
His confidence is a big deal for a young team who is working to build their identity and compete against other franchises with much more experience.
Check out this one fan blog:
http://staaaaaaaaan.blogspot.com/2007/05/in-his-element-baron-davis.html
by Portland Dynasty on
May 14, 2008 12:33 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Do you really think he'll opt out though?.... Read this....
It could be all about his legacy.
http://www.sacbee.com/100/story/526336.html
Right now, Baron Davis’ legacy as an NBA star is definitely forgetable. Yup, that is the sad truth. With out that RING, he is just another NBA-made millionaire. Why wouldn’t this motivate him to opt out?
by Portland Dynasty on
May 14, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Link: Sums up the Current Scenario with Golden State and Baron's contract
http://thehoopdoctors.com/online/?p=39
If you have been reading this blog, you must read this link.
by Portland Dynasty on
May 14, 2008 12:45 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Thanks for the links!
I’m gonna read up and be the most edumacated boy in the whole world!
Before I read though, I just don’t think Baron is at a point where he’d be willing to accept a co-star, supporting role. He’s still talented enough to be the top dog, and I don’t see why he’d back down from that. And as top dog, I don’t think it helps the Blazers because we need our top 3 to be the top dog from now on.
I’ll go read though, thanks again for the links!
Baron Von Mortimer
by Mortimer on
May 14, 2008 1:05 PM PDT
up
0 recs
don't forget
We’re not winning a championship in the next two years. Has a rookie starting center ever won the championship? Our window opens too late for Davis.
"Reality is for people who can't handle Blazers Edge." - MiledAnimal
by tominhawaii on
May 14, 2008 1:18 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Yup yup
That’s why I ain’t for a stop-gap at the PG spot like Baron or Andre Miller. It could work, but I think we prefer keeping a consistent team together and not introducing a STAR who would dominate the team when we’d only have them for a year or two.
‘Course, we winnin’ that there title next year. It just makes more sense than losing.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
May 14, 2008 1:27 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Not Bad
Except that Frye proved last season that he’s not that great of a center.
"Reality is for people who can't handle Blazers Edge." - MiledAnimal
by tominhawaii on
May 14, 2008 11:12 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Frye does fit the Warriors up-temp style...
He wouldn’t ever be a true center, but he would be a solid piece to a Four-Pronged Post attack including Andris Beidrins, Al Harrington & Brandon Wright.
by Portland Dynasty on
May 14, 2008 12:04 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I like this trade more.
Outlaw can probably play the PF spot better than the 13th pick.
If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley
by Winchester on
May 14, 2008 12:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
do not want
do i have any good reason? no. Just seems wrong.
We’re a young team, he’s not. We have future stars growing together, and he’s already grown. I seem to remember not liking him for some reason, and i like the blazers and I think i’d like to keep not liking him. He takes away from the specialness of the team for me.
I suppose I could come up with good reasons, but I’m sick and if my brain was functioning i’d be working.
Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!
by ratbastird on May 14, 2008 10:54 AM PDT 0 recs
Yes.
He plays bigger than he actualy is. He can guard forwards because he is strong enough and he can guard everone else because he is quick. Plus he got one vote for the NBA defensive team.
If somebody hits you with an object you should beat the hell out of them.-Charles Barkley
by Winchester on
May 14, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
up
0 recs
ummm....
Baron is an outstanding defender. He would instantly be our best on ball perimeter defender and would lead the team in steals by a landslide.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on
May 14, 2008 2:48 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Then there's the Nellie factor
Don Nelson might be the only man who can coach Davis. If he decides not to return as coach, whether this season or next, I would be inclined, were I Chris Mullin, to trade Davis while his value is high.
With whom else would Davis work well? Phil Jackson, probably. Rick Adelman, but only for a while. Mike D’Antoni, maybe. It’s a lot easier to list coaches with whom Davis would butt heads. Nate is one of those.
Ratbastird said it best: Just seems wrong.
by MiledAnimal on May 14, 2008 11:22 AM PDT 0 recs
I would do it without a second's hesitation
Davis/Blake
Roy/Rudy
Martell/Jones
Aldridge/Frye
Oden Pryzbilla
That’s two All-Stars and two more potential All-Stars in the starting lineup. And solid back-ups at every single position. If the Warriors would be willing I’d say do it in a second.
by AndrewD on May 16, 2008 10:32 PM PDT 0 recs









