Harris or Calderon
I know there's been endless debate about possible point guards on this site and Harris and Calderon have been at the front of that debate.
What we've been arguing on a recent post is who is more coveted between the two among GM's and fans on this site.
You be the GM.
Very simply, if we were going to aquire one of these guys this offseason, and it cost the same to get them, who would you choose?
Settle the debate, what is the popular opinion?
5 recs |
119
comments
Comments
Harris
He’s the better defender and the better penetrator. Calderon is the better passer and shooter, but I think we need Harris’ strengths more.
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on May 13, 2008 12:12 PM PDT 0 recs
I see Harris as a better fit for our team
They both need the ball to be most effective, but so does Brandon. Harris is the better defender and will be able to drive and dish to our shooters.
If it fills a need, if it fills a rebuilding situation. And my goal is to fill and rebuild and I am not going to be shortsighted.
- Isiah Thomas
by JTDuck22 on May 13, 2008 12:19 PM PDT 0 recs
Harris played in the backcourt with Jason Terry
He can play just fine without the ball.
I’d love to get Conley too.
by BlazerD on
May 14, 2008 1:50 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Didnt Terry
get moved to second unit because he did not play well with Harris?
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
May 14, 2008 8:18 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Keep Oden/LMA out of foul trouble!
Get a good PG defender!
Yay Harris Yay Harris! He’s only 25, while ol’ man Calderon is picking up his social security checks at the ripe age of 27. Plus Calderon has had only one good season, while Harris has had as many good seasons as he’s been in the NBA! I don’t care what they are listed at, Harris is bigger than Calderon. It’s science.
We GOT an amazing playmaker in Roy. Calderon isn’t better than Roy at that. Why not get a decent shooting, GREAT defending, ultra fast athletic PG with a good attitude and able to penetrate on anyone better than Jack?
We won’t need Harris to be our shooter, and he CAN hit the shot just fine. His defense, length, speed, fastbreaking, and athletic ability is exactly what we are missing.
Harris over Calderon, ‘08.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on May 13, 2008 12:25 PM PDT 1 recs
Wow
we Harris fans seem to be a vocal minority. Let’s here some arguments from Senor Calderon’s supporters!
Boomshakalaka
by jksnake99 on May 13, 2008 12:40 PM PDT 0 recs
I think our arguments have silenced them
If it fills a need, if it fills a rebuilding situation. And my goal is to fill and rebuild and I am not going to be shortsighted.
- Isiah Thomas
by JTDuck22 on
May 13, 2008 12:42 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Umm
Calderon is the better player…Harris will fill our holes a little better. Who will be the better fit? Kinda hard to say, but I’ll lean towards Calderon.
by Philthyanimal on May 13, 2008 1:54 PM PDT 0 recs
Neither one will be a blazer
Guaranteed. Both of those guys were potentially on the trading block this winter, and KP could not pry either of them loose. Now Toronto is committing to Calderon and New Jersey is building around Harris. KP will have to be pretty creative to come up with a veteran point guard better than Steve Blake (a great move by the way). He may feel that with Oden and Rudy + the further development of Roy, Alderidge, etc. he can live for the time being with the point guards the Blazers currently have and maybe add a rookie like Westbrook.
by Spencer on May 13, 2008 1:56 PM PDT 0 recs
Yep, Matt Carroll is the answer
I’d trade Rudy, Sergio, Jack, Blake, and Frye for him.
"Reality is for people who can't handle Blazers Edge." - MiledAnimal
by tominhawaii on
May 13, 2008 3:19 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Toronto or New Jersey can both be motivated... Especially New Jersey
If you haven’t heard the long-time rumors of LeBron James planning a move to the “Nets” read this article: http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-lebronjayz022508&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
If this is the case, the Nets franchise as it sits now is and will be ready for total upheaval. Stock-pilling picks, euro-prospects and young talent all are in the best interest of truly building around LeBron James. The have FC Sean Williams, FC Josh Boone, FC Nenad Kristic and PG Marcus Williams all under age 24.
What New Jersey has now…
2008: 1st Round Pick of New Jersey & 1st Round Pick from Dallas
2009: 1st Round Pick of New Jesery
2010: 1st Round Pick of New Jersey & 1st Round Pick of Dallas
If they were to be able to leverage Harris (or Kidd in retrospect) to get two additional first round picks and two very solid young role players like PG Jarrett Jack and FC Channing Frye, along with a grip of 2nd round picks they could use to start finding international prospects to add into the mix, I could see New Jersey pulling the trigger.
Would Harris be worth: J.Jack, C.Frye, P.Kopponen, & Portland Picks 2008 first round pick (#13), 2008 2nd round pick (#36 & #55), 2009 2nd Round pick and 2010 1st round pick (totaling TWO 1st’s and THREE 2nd’s plus 3 players)?
What New Jersey would have:
2008: 1st Round Pick (Portland #13),1st Round Pick (New Jersey #9)&1st Round Pick (Dallas#21), plus 3 total 2nd round selections in 2008
2009: 1st Round Pick of New Jesery, plus (2) 2nd round picks
2010: 1st Round Pick of New Jersey, 1st Round Pick of Dallas, 1st Round Pick of Portland, plus 2nd.
Yes, SEVEN first rounders in the next three years and SIX 2nd rounders, plus adding 2 players and a prospect. Think of all the damage Portland has done with Multiple draft picks over the course of back-to back season’s. Plus, Harris being gone would likely help out their draft picks being lower in the lottery.
This Brooklyn team could be the below players plus those 7-1sts and 6-2nds sprikled in:
PG: Marcus Williams/Jarrett Jack/P.Koponen
SG:
SF: LeBron James/
PF: Channing Frye/
FC: Sean Williams/Josh Boone
If I was Jersey/Brooklyn owners I’d do it. I would do it if I was LeBron too… His deal with Nike ($100M, will double if he moves to a New York market!!!). Plus, the team the Cavs have around him is kinda old.
by Portland Dynasty on
May 14, 2008 9:42 AM PDT
up
0 recs
A few adjustments
I’d pull the 2010 1st round pick out ot that proposal, and substitute Sergio for Koponen.
If Pritch can “slap” Harris away from NJ without having to sacrifice Webster or Outlaw it would be a coup.
by two4larue on
May 14, 2008 2:44 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Harris
Defense, speed. I’m also not sure that Calderon would want to play off Brandon Roy.
by ranma on May 13, 2008 2:21 PM PDT 0 recs
I just have to add
That anyone who votes against Devin Harris is racist.
Calderon is good, and I could see someone thinking we are overrating Harris with how much we build him up around here, but I don’t know how someone could watch both players and think Calderon is a better player or a better fit. Surround Harris with that many shooters (who CAN’T shoot on the Raptors?) and he’ll get gaudy assist numbers too. Put him in a team offense that isn’t predicated on one-on-one play like in Dallas and he’d get more than 5 assists a game. Not to act like a know it all, because I am not an expert on these two players, but I watched a LOT of Raptors games and I watched Harris even more after the Nets trade.
Harris is a better player and a better fit. Calderon is a much better spot up shooter, and obviously has a crazy A/TO ratio. But like Arenas said, so did Kevin Ollie. Calderon benefits from having so many shooters, and he would likely have the same situation here in Portland… but so would Harris, and Harris is eons quicker and better equipped to take on the Derons and Pauls of the West.
I think both players are available for the right price, and I am not convinced Toronto is going to make Calderon the nicely paid starter over TJ Ford (like some suggest). They SHOULD do that, but if they can’t move TJ Ford they will have a tough time doing so.
Point is, I like Calderon a lot. I like Harris more, and if you disagree you must be a virulent racist who wishes Hitler won World War 2. I think it is a logical assumption on my part.
A Harris/Roy/Fernandez backcourt would be a thing of beauty.
I also believe it won’t be the end of the world if we don’t ‘upgrade’ our PG position, and see what happens. It might be like last summer, when we NEEDED a better SF. We don’t worry so much about that now (I know some do, but not like last summer when everyone wanted Rashard Lewis).
Mortimer
by Mortimer on May 13, 2008 2:24 PM PDT 0 recs
I want to go on record as someone who hates Hitler
That jerk ruined the coolest mustache for everyone. Why couldn’t he just grow a big ole’ bushy mustache? Those are lame!
"Reality is for people who can't handle Blazers Edge." - MiledAnimal
by tominhawaii on
May 13, 2008 8:51 PM PDT
up
0 recs
mustaches are sooo awesome!
Girls use them as handle bars and guys just look so cool! Even the small ones remind girls of fuzzy caterpillars and girls think those are cool.
Tom, you’re just dead wrong on the whole mustache controversy
Here's to being hated. Come on #1 pick!
by ratbastird on
May 14, 2008 11:02 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Did you watch American Idol last night?
They mayor of the town that Utah-David is from had a crappy early 1990’s western shirt on and a mustache that stuck out about four inches from each cheek.
"Reality is for people who can't handle Blazers Edge." - MiledAnimal
by tominhawaii on
May 14, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
up
0 recs
yeah
and the mayor of Seyesha Florida did a hand stand
If it fills a need, if it fills a rebuilding situation. And my goal is to fill and rebuild and I am not going to be shortsighted.
- Isiah Thomas
by JTDuck22 on
May 15, 2008 7:55 AM PDT
up
0 recs
He ruined the name Adolph
also.
"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and miss" Robert A. Heinlein
by 92wastheyear on
May 14, 2008 11:08 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I think Adolf Harnack beat him to the punch.
One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season
"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus
by T Darkstar on
May 14, 2008 6:48 PM PDT
up
0 recs
ya
i agree that we dont need to upgrade the PG spot this year. it’d be nice but its not a big deal if we dont. The point about Jose is fair that he has a ton of shooters, but even then TJ ford cant produce the numbers Jose can.
by Philthyanimal on
May 13, 2008 2:48 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I have been echoing your point about Calderon's
assist numbers as well. If you watch him play, he passes the ball around the perimeter or drives and kicks to some of the best shooters in the NBA including Jason Kopono….it’s pretty easy to get gaudy assist numbers with those shooters. I also have been urging the people to watch Calderon play who thinks he’s the best thing since sliced bread. I had one guy arguing with me that Calderon was as good a point guard as Steve Nash…to which I replied, “have you actually watched Nash and Calderon play?” To which he responded “well if you look at their per 48 minutes numbers, they’re close.” I say folks use your eyes! Actually, see how the players you are evaluating are impacting the flow of the game. Ask yourselves how this guy would fit in with the Blazers. If you watch both Calderon and Harris play, it’s pretty obvious that Devon Harris brings an element we lack right now at the point guard spot which is athleticism, ability to lead and FINISH the break, and tough defense. Calderon brings much of the same as Steve Blake, careful with the ball, good perimeter shooting, and savy player.
by JasonT on
May 13, 2008 4:11 PM PDT
up
0 recs
At the end of the day...
The game is about scoring more points than the other team. Calderon helps you do that more than Harris will.
by tingeyga on
May 13, 2008 10:22 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Wins Produced Per 48 Minutes
Calderon had the 4th most Wins Produced by a PG and 12th in the NBA last season, ranking just ahead of Chauncey Billups.
Harris finished with the 15th most Wins Produced by a PG and 88th in the NBA last season, ranking behind players such as Antonio Daniels and Maurice Williams
Full chart for the top 15 PGs:
http://www.wagesofwins.com/15PG0708.html
by tingeyga on
May 13, 2008 11:57 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Wins Produced is useless
It ignores the possibility of diminishing returns and doesn’t correlate very strongly with adjusted +/- data.
If you want to get an idea of how much each player helps hos team score more points that the other team, Adjusted +/- is a good way to go. Its a very “noisy” stat, even with a full year’s worth of data, so you have to be careful not to read too much into it if the differences aren’t very big.
That said, Harris had an adjusted +/- of +7.44 (standard error 4.16) this year, while Calderon had an adjusted +/- of -5.47 (standard error 6.08). Thats a big enough difference that we can be almost 90% sure that Harris helped his team win more that Calderon did.
by trk on
May 14, 2008 1:26 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Interesting...
Your critique of Wins Produced ignoring diminishing returns is valid. However if you look at the Wins Produced per 48 minutes (which tries to correct that problem), the gap between Calderon and Harris becomes even wider.
As for the findings of the adjusted +/, I think that a grain of salt needs to be taken when looking at these numbers, as here are the adjusted +/ of a few guards that I found suprising:
- Chris Paul: .06 (std error 6.36)
Brandon Roy: .90 (std error 4.66)
- Monta Ellis: -0.11 (std error 4.24)
It seems that statistics based on box scores love Calderon (PER, WP48, etc.) while statistics based on other measures lean toward Harris
by tingeyga on
May 14, 2008 3:47 PM PDT
up
0 recs
How in the world do they come up with those numbers?
by JasonT on
May 14, 2008 8:41 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Wins Produced Calculation
Is by no means a simple matter, but if you wish to go into the nitty gritty the method is described here:
http://www.wagesofwins.com/CalculatingWinsProduced.html
by tingeyga on
May 14, 2008 3:15 PM PDT
up
0 recs
You had me until you started with the "it's easy to get assists when you play with blah blah blah"
Ew. If you want to judge them on their merits and you find Harris better that’s fine. But don’t diminish Calderon’s playmaking ability like that – it’s completely misleading and inaccurate.
by leeroyjenkins on
May 19, 2008 7:22 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Thank goodness.
Is anyone sad that we did not get Rashard Lewis? We may likewise be just as glad next season to not have Calderon or Harris. Either that, or we’ll be kicking ourselves.
One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season
"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus
by T Darkstar on
May 13, 2008 5:33 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I can't decide
I mean, I think Calderon and Harris are better than Rashard, and offer things more important to our team, but I can’t decide if this debate is too similar to that one as well. With the young guys we got, it’s hard to say. Perhaps Jack suddenly stops jumping to pass and his ankles heal enough for him to guard good PGs. Maybe Sergio works out that kink and becomes an adequate shooter. Who can say? I doubt even KP could say. You can only hope and trust the guys to work to improve…
Last year, we did have Outlaw and Marty, who most thought would improve and could possibly be the answer at SF. This year, we’re either thinking Blake will be ‘good enough’, or hoping Jack will solve a lot of his inner turmoil and addiction to turnovers. Sergio could make the jump eventually, but to count on it would likely be folly.
Is this much ado about nuthin’?
I can’t decide. I think it’s different. Or is it..?!
Hmmm… Mortimer…
by Mortimer on
May 13, 2008 5:38 PM PDT
up
0 recs
too easy
Harris. I would take Hinrich over Calderon as well…
RUDY > MJ
by myemic23 on May 13, 2008 4:29 PM PDT 0 recs
I am with you...
I am actually a big Hinrich fan, especially if you want defense.
by The Graduate on
May 14, 2008 1:22 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Numbers
I know numbers don’t mean much to Mortimer since his “science” tells him that Harris is bigger when every basketball site says otherwise. But who can argue with crazy science.
Here’s a numbers breakdown of how some of the West’s best point guards fared against the defense of one Devin Harris, and one Jose Manuel Calderon.
Paul against:
Harris 26.6 pts 45% 10.3 A 1.6 TO
Calderon 21.5 pts 51% 16 A 1 TO
Williams against:
Harris 23 pts 50% 11.6 A 2.3 TO
Calderon 21.5 pts 50% 4.5 A 2.5 TO
Parker against:
Harris 18.33 pts 39% 6A 2.33 TO
Calderon 15 pts 33% 4A 7 TO
I’ll admit that numbers don’t tell the whole story, but if you get enough of them you get a general idea. So if you are one of those guys who is hanging your hat on the “defense, defense, defense” argument, please show me something that will make me see that Devin Harris is significantly better than Calderon. In fact if anything these numbers are slightly in Calderon’s favor, and in not one of these games against top flight penetrating point guards did any Toronto big men foul out (only once did Bargnani even come close).
Here’s how they fared offensively against the West’s elite.
Harris 13.7 pts 45% 6.2 A 2.6 TO
Calderon 12.6 pts 48% 7 A 2 TO
If the numbers don’t show that Harris is significantly better defensively than Calderon then I’ll go ahead and take the guy who is a significantly better shooter from anywhere on the floor, a better passer and playmaker (per 48 one of the best in the league), and who takes care of the ball as good as anyone in the league. That’s the kind of science I go by.
And would someone please explain to Mortimer that 33% from 3 point range actually means you can’t hit the shot that well.
by TubbaDubba on May 13, 2008 4:59 PM PDT 1 recs
source?
If it fills a need, if it fills a rebuilding situation. And my goal is to fill and rebuild and I am not going to be shortsighted.
- Isiah Thomas
by JTDuck22 on
May 13, 2008 5:18 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I need no explanation
33% is passable from 3 point range. It’s Drexler-esque. For a guy who isn’t there to shoot 3’s, it is good.
If you really think Calderon is a BETTER or AS GOOD defender as Harris, then I leave you to your better judgement. You are seeing something that no one else in the world is not, and I envy your insight.
And if you trust what people are listed at, then Damon was pushing 6 feet tall and Barkeley was 6’8”.
I apologize that you are sensitive about a benign subject. No one is saying Calderon isn’t good. Most just don’t think he is as good a fit as Harris, or some (like me) think Harris is better. You can tell me yourself though, no one else needs to translate for me. Your writing does just fine in getting across your point and while I wasn’t debating you personally, I fully understand the scope of your argument. Numbers are your God, and what people see shouldn’t even enter into the equation. Every game is equal to each other, and Harris playing the West’s best 3-4 times a year equals Calderon playing one home and away. And, Harris’ playoff defense on Tony Parker means nothing, while Calderon’s highly visible defensive liabilities against JAMEER NELSON shan’t not enter the argument.
Why single me out though? Lots of people think Harris is better. Numbers often tell less than half the story. Roy’s numbers aren’t that great; does that make him not as important as, say, Caron Butler? Of course not. Things you see and realize watching Roy game after game tell you his value goes beyond numbers. Now, obviously, I am not saying you have not watched Calderon or Harris, but if you have not seen them much, then the numbers do little to shine light on the debate.
No need to act like a kid with parents who don’t talk to each other and are about to get a divorce and use the other kids as messenger pigeons. I read your numbers loud and clear.
Mortimer?
by Mortimer on
May 13, 2008 5:24 PM PDT
up
1 recs
Also
Just because the numbers here say more people like Harris (making me correct in my assessment), it doesn’t mean that is right either. Calderon could be the better fit.
The point is, I love you. Kiss me you scandalish rogue!
Smoochrtimer!
by Mortimer on
May 13, 2008 5:48 PM PDT
up
0 recs
All in good fun Mortimer.
Just meant it as a little good natured ribbing, my appoligies if I took it too far. I think you were kinda joking around too when you said that Caderon supporters were racists, you were just a little more obvious about it than me.
First of all I never said that Calderon is a better defender than Harris and I don’t believe that he is. My point was that the numbers in those games against some of the better PG’s we will regularily face don’t show Calderon as a glaring defensive deficiency, and they don’t show Harris as a lock down defender. What it shows is that if Harris is that much better of a defender than Calderon it certainly didn’t display itself in the performances of these three elite PG’s. They fared no better against Calderon then they did against Harris.
I also said numbers don’t tell the whole story, they can however give a general idea. I went through the box scores of Harris and Calderon’s games against these three PG’s because I wanted to see how much of a diference his defense made with the only resourse I currently have available, boxscores. Obviously, they don’t always match up against each other throughout the course of a game, Harris did have three more games against these three then did Calderon, and Calderon didn’t always play as many minutes as Harris because of splitting time with Ford.
But I do feel that I took a sampling of enough games that the deficiencies in the process do not tend to favor one player over another to a large degree. Feel free to disagree.
As far as Calderon’s size, I realize that players heits and weights are’nt always acurate. But 25 lbs is a lot to be off, and that would only make them the same weight. You might be able to convince me that they are roughly the same size, but to say Harris is bigger just seems like a substantial stretch. He is pretty skinny after all.
Since you said something nice about Calderon, I’ll say something nice about Harris. I like him. I’d be thrilled if he came to the blazers. But I’d only take him over Calderon if his 3 point percentage were 8-10 points higher. Thats the deal breaker for me.
by TubbaDubba on
May 13, 2008 7:37 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I'll never forgive, never forget
Sorry, I read it as you being mad/annoyed with me. I just wanna be buddies.
Like I said, I like Calderon and think he’s great. I liked watching him run the Raptors. He is a big game player too, from his success with the Spanish team. I even like his gang sign he does when he hits a 3 point basket-shot. I’m even kinda glad he did so poorly in the playoffs, because it could possibly give Toronto second thoughts about moving TJ Ford for pennies on the dollar, and doing their best to get the most for Caldy. I can’t remember with Raptor media blog it was from, but I even remember reading some grumbling from the Raptors camp about Calderon’s poor playoff performance against so-so competition and that maybe he isn’t a big game player (perhaps a bargaining ploy). I hope that was true, cuz’ it’d be asinine on their part. So, my points aren’t anti-Calderon, as he’d be a great improvement. Reasonable people can easily disagree, and I just think Harris fits us better. Plus, he kinda looks like Maya Rudolph and I liked her on SNL.
All of this notwithstanding, I’m furious with you and this fall out of our longstanding friendship is my own personal 9/11.
No one can stop the Chris Pauls or Greg Odens or Deron Williams, so we want whoever can slow them down a lil’, or at least play intelligently. If we go with Calderon, or the more dramatic Roy/Fernandez guard lineup eventually, it’ll require the whole team to play together on defense to handle Paul, and the one on one defense possibly won’t be AS important—we’ll just want someone capable and able to funnel the enemy to their weak spots.
Now, when I say Calderon is a bad defender, it isn’t the same way as saying Z-Bo is a bad defender… Calderon is just out athleticized at the PG spot; he certainly TRIES though and has the reputation of being a smart player. I’d just rather have a guy who is a good playmaker, quick as biscuits, and equals the athleticism of the best PGs. I think all of that is much more important than 3-point shooting.
Harris isn’t a bad shooter, like Jason Kidd. He doesn’t throw up bricks, he just doesn’t shoot the 3 that much—but he can hit it. They won’t be going under the screen on him. I agree that we want a good shooter to surround Roy’s playmaking, but I don’t think 33% is a liability. That’s average and fine, and all the other benefits we get are more important (to me) than shooting the 3.
Hopefully, the rumor about the Nets GM Rod Thorn loving Jack was true… even though Kiki is the GM for the Nets now, Thorn will be an influence, right? Plus Kiki was a bad Gm for the Nuggets, so we could maybe Pritch-slap him around a bit just for fun.
Mortimer, friend to all.
by Mortimer on
May 13, 2008 8:32 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Complimentary point guards
“25 lbs is a lot to be off, and that would only make them the same weight. You might be able to convince me that they are roughly the same size, but to say Harris is bigger just seems like a substantial stretch. He is pretty skinny after all.”
If you’re concerned that Harris would be posted up by larger point guards, remember, Blake would be Devin’s (hypothetical) backup
by two4larue on
May 14, 2008 3:09 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Not concerned
I never said I was concerned about Harris’s size, I was simply addressing the assertation above that Harris is bigger than Calderon. They both have good size for PG, and Blake is the same size as Harris so I don’t know how Blake being his backup makes a difference.
by TubbaDubba on
May 14, 2008 4:49 PM PDT
up
0 recs
As the stats guys always say
kind of apologetically when they talk about their all defense picks, there are no good statistical gauges for individual defensive play in the NBA. You can look at stuff like adjusted +/- and take into consideration the full panoply of defensive stats (rebounding/steals/blocks) but those only take you so far. Guys like Bowen, Prince, and Battier don’t show up on steals/blocks leaderboards but they’re the best wing defenders in the game.
So you kind of just have to rely on the evidence in front of your face.
And yeah, by the measure of watching the games, it’s obvious that Harris is significantly better defensively than Calderon. Guys like Tony Parker or CP3 are gonna get their stats against everyone, even Harris as good as he is defensively. But getting taken to town by Orlando’s back court is something else. And Harris gave Tony Parker enough fits so that he talked after the trade about how happy he was that they were sending him to the Eastern Conference, which is a pretty nice sign of respect by a star PG for a non-star role player.
by howlingfantods on
May 14, 2008 8:22 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Agreed, defensive ability is difficult to quantify
But I think it’s safe to say that if D Will drops 41 on you and you are the guy primarily responsible for guarding him, then you didn’t do a very good job defensively on him that game. Good defenders should cause their opponents to score less and shoot a worse percentage than their average, not necessarily on any given night, but certainly when averaged over time.
by TubbaDubba on
May 14, 2008 10:53 AM PDT
up
0 recs
D Will can do that anytime
Part of our problem this past season was that the non-star PGs were killing us also. Felton, Nate Robinson, Earl Watson, etc. Like others have pointed out, you just hope to make things tougher for the Pauls and Derons of the world, but not only didn’t we have a chance against them we couldn’t stop the mediocre of the PGs. If they were somewhat quick, they killed us.
Calderon doesn’t fix that. Harris likely would. He has defended quick PGs as good as anyone has, and won’t get abused by the non-stars like Blake and Jack have.
Drexler was all-defense a bunch of times, and Jordan still scored 30+ on him. Doesn’t mean he’s a bad or average defender; the best defense can’t stop the best offense, ever. All it can do is make the offense WORK for their shots. Harris makes people work more than Calderon could just because of the athleticism gap.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
May 14, 2008 11:15 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I was replying to your comment from above
“Harris is eons quicker and better equipped to take on the Derons and Pauls of the West.”
You brought them up, I was just responding to it.
We also had centers, power forward, small forwards, and shooting guards that had good games against us, not just point guards. I think the hysteria about needing a better defensive point guard is overrated. Especially since we actually held Paul and Williams well below their averages when they played us, unlike Harris and Calderon’s teams. And again, it’s gonna be a lot harder for those quick PG’s to drive the lane and score next year because instead of uncontested layups they’ll be shooting teardrop floaters over the outstretched arms of one G.O.
Paul against Blazers – 16.5 pts 9 Assists 3.6 TO
DWill against Blazers – 15.75 pts 8.5 Assists 3.25 TO
Now how do we stop David West from tearing us up?
by TubbaDubba on
May 14, 2008 1:41 PM PDT
up
0 recs
No, sometimes guys just get hot
and there’s not much you can do.
I haven’t looked at the box scores you seem to be looking at but it is true that Devin does have trouble against the bigger pgs, guys like Deron and Baron.
Offense beats defense in this league most times. Best you can do is hope to take away some of the things the opponent likes to do best. There’s no “stopping” great offensive players—there’s just taking away some of the things their team likes to do to try to get wins despite that player’s great offense. Jordan always got his points against the bad boy pistons, but they won more of their series (before the team fell apart) because they made him earn every one of his points.
Sometimes what you need to do to get a win is to make one guy the scorer—did the jazz have a bad game 4 against Kobe when he went off for 33 10 and 8, but they won the game in OT? No, suckering Kobe into going all one on five, teen-wolf style is one of the keys to beating the lakers, but Ronnie Brewer might be considered by casual fans to have done a bad job for giving up 33.
Or San Antone in years past always tried to play steve nash to be the scorer and reduce the number of playmaking opportunities for his teammates. Same thing that they’re trying to do (and only succeeding at home) against CP3.
by howlingfantods on
May 14, 2008 2:03 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Devin does have trouble against the bigger pgs, guys like Deron and Baron.
As I commented above, that’s where having a larger defender like Steve Blake comes in. Harris and Blake’s defensive strengths would reinforce the other’s weaknesses
by two4larue on
May 14, 2008 3:13 PM PDT
up
0 recs
What if Nate Robinson drops 40 something..
how good of a defender/defensive team are you then
by raging WebTed on
May 14, 2008 8:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
If the rest of the team
gets only 40 more combined…I would say good. If the rest of the team gets like 70….then not so good.
"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and miss" Robert A. Heinlein
by 92wastheyear on
May 14, 2008 10:17 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Thanks
I found out what I wanted to know. It appears that there are more Harris supporters on this site than there are for Calderon.
Don’t tell Mortimer though, numbers just confuse him.
by TubbaDubba on May 13, 2008 5:04 PM PDT 0 recs
One more
This from Scout.com
“What makes Calderon such a steady point guard is his ability to quarterback the offense and control the tempo of the game, with proof of that being his 8.7 assists per game. He has an unbelievable turnover to assist ratio at 5:1. Calderon’s efficiency at his position is unmatched and the argument could be made that he is right behind Chris Paul of the Hornets as the best distributing guard in the game.
Another stellar aspect of Calderon’s game is his shooting ability. While he may not be a go to option, Calderon can easily blow by a defender and pull up for a mid-range jump shot and nail it consistently. Calderon is averaging 12 ppg. He is also very proficient from behind the arc and can knock down the open three, as he is shooting an outstanding 46% from three-point land.
The one aspect of Calderon’s game that needs some work is his defense. He isn’t the most athletic player and that hurts him at times, but Calderon is still a decent defender. He might have a hard time guarding quicker point guards, but Calderon can usually hold his own.”
by TubbaDubba on May 13, 2008 5:13 PM PDT 0 recs
defense
I know our main thing for our next point guard is to be able to stop Paul, Parker, and Deron…but honestly these guy are good because they are unstoppable. Harris may be able to slow them down a tad, but no one can take them out of their game.
So…why pay a premium for a good defensive guard when offensive ones can be had for a lot less money? If we can get someone who is offensively as good as those guys…then it is in essence a zero sum game.
by Philthyanimal on May 13, 2008 6:38 PM PDT 0 recs
that's quite a leap
to say Calderon is as good as Paul, Parker or Deron. I wouldn’t even argue that Harris is that good and I think Harris is better than Calderon.
by JasonT on
May 13, 2008 7:36 PM PDT
up
0 recs
no way
I never said that Calderon is as good as those guys. All 3 of them are outstanding offensively and pretty good defensively as well. In Paul’s case he’s 2nd team all d.
However as far as distributing the ball goes, Jose is up with the best of them. He may not be able to create his own shot as well as Paul or Parker, but you’d be hard pressed to find many guys who can create for his teammates as well as Jose.
by Philthyanimal on
May 13, 2008 9:16 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Calderon's price
Calderon will prolly cost somewhere around the Hinrich/Harris range of just below 10 million a year, if we sign n’ trade for him. I don’t think the offensive PGs are any cheaper, and are usually more expensive than defensive specialists. If you get one who is good defensively AND offensively, ya do your best to snag him because most PGs don’t go both ways.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
May 13, 2008 8:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Videos - beyond the numbers
Here’s one of Devon Harris…all Mavericks stuff http://youtube.com/watch?v=SwFzC4-IFPE
Here’s Devon Harris’ first game with NJ http://youtube.com/watch?v=ulvVGqlPnW0
Here’s a Jose Calderon mix http://youtube.com/watch?v=_4IUsQg8zJU
Just for fun…here’s a Sergio Rodriguez mix (some international and NBA) http://youtube.com/watch?v=UrnhlFcrLn0
More Sergio NBA video http://youtube.com/watch?v=p8X-NuDN_


