Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

The Coaching Two-Step

If you’ve read the news today you know that there are reports of two coaches moving on. Avery Johnson has been officially let go by the Mavericks and Jack McCallum of SI.com is reporting that Phoenix coach Mike D’Antoni will suffer the same fate. 

Obviously we have no access to the inner workings of either team.  We don’t know the whole story here.  But from a layman’s point of view it looks like both coaches received the axe for the early playoff exits, which leads this layman at least to ask, “What the heck is going on in this league?”

Avery Johnson has compiled a 194-70 record with the Mavericks.  If you’re counting, that’s a 73.5% winning clip.  Seventy-three-point-five percent!  Any doctoral-level theoretical mathematician worth his spectacles could tell you that’s nearly three out of every four games this guy won.  Before he took over Dallas was an exciting-yet-underachieving group…a team that couldn’t get its act together or play defense to save its soul.  Johnson taught that team the difference between scoring and winning.  He led them to the best record in the league last season.  He had the misfortune of catching Superman’s kryptonite in the Warriors last year and hitting one of the hottest teams of the year this season in the Hornets.  Could Dallas have played better in both series?  Probably.  Could Dallas have gone deep into the playoffs with another, presumably better, coach?  There’s no evidence of that.  How much better can they get, especially having traded for Kidd now?

That story doubles for D’Antoni as well.  His record is a comparatively modest 276-172, 61.6%.  Then again, how many teams have had that kind of run the last few years?  D’Antoni gift-wrapped that Phoenix offense for his team.  Yes he has some great players but he also instituted a system to maximize the talents of those players.  He helped make Steve Nash a perpetual M.V.P. candidate.  He had the courage to play Amare Stoudemire at the center position.  His system is the archetype for a half-dozen competitors and his success has still never been duplicated.  Where are the Suns without him?  Good…sure.  But they were one questionable suspension away from toppling the Spurs and having a great chance at the World Championship one year ago.  Is it D’Antoni’s fault that they keep running into the team of the decade year after year?  Is it his fault that Shaq is a $20 million paperweight?  If losing to the Spurs in the playoffs were a crime half the coaches in the West should be fired.  How do you let go the guy who made you?

A bigger question:  unless they simply exchange coaches where are these teams going to find an upgrade or even someone equal?  These are squads heading over the apex of their winning parabola.  You’re not going to turn over the reins to a rookie.  You need guaranteed winning now.  Who is out there?  Are you going to pluck Pat Riley out of Miami’s front office?  Is Jeff Van Gundy really a step up?  Do you want Don Nelson back?  Larry Brown has already been hired but I bet he’ll be willing to break his contract by the second week of Summer League.  More power to him too, when things like this happen.  He gets labeled a fickle mercenary and a quitter.  What about when the shoe is on the other foot?

If I were a Mavs or Suns fan I’m pretty sure I’d be screaming loudly about these developments.  I know it’s easy to get myopic, especially when you’re wishing for rings and get an early vacation instead.  But come on…doesn’t ANY franchise want a long-term, signature coach at the helm anymore?  Are they all disposable?  And if they are, what does that say about the importance of the position? 

Bottom line:  these two guys didn’t get all stupid overnight.  Maybe their front offices did though.  Have fun on the spiral downward.  Too bad for the guys you’ll blame for that.  If experience is any guide, in another three years you’ll be pining to have this caliber of coach back.  But at that point you won't be able to hire one.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

0 recs  |  Comment 54 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Gotta say I really disagree with you here.

These guys weren’t incompetents of course, and they did a lot for their teams, particularly Dantoni who is a personal hero for bringing the fast break game back to the league.

But I don’t think anyone would want their potential championship contender coached by either of these guys. Avery’s proven to have serious problems with in-game coaching and making adjustments during series and game-planning - the kind of stuff that’s critical to post-season success. So yeah, 73.5% w/l record in the regular season, but a 48.9% w/l record in the playoffs. And I think he hasn’t taken nearly enough criticism for how poorly he used Kidd after the trade - he’s an open court guy, not a half court pick and roll plodder.

Dantoni got a rawer deal, he’s had a lot of playoff success, and really the reason why the Suns never won a championship is because of their tightwad ownership. But it’s pretty undeniable that Dantoni got badly outcoached by Pops. But it looked like they missed their last great opportunity last year, and their problems with interior defense and rebounding were getting worse and worse. Steve Kerr has what, five rings as a member of the Jordan Bulls and the Twin Towers Spurs, two of the great defensive and rebounding teams of all time. It was just a matter of time before he started clashing with Dantoni in terms of future direction for the team.

The funny thing is that really, both teams should just trade their coaches. Dallas should be running and gunning with their roster; Suns want to slow down and play more grind-it-out style.

by howlingfantods on May 1, 2008 12:30 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If ya don't like Nate much either...

What coaches DO you like?

These guys seem like good coaches getting a raw deal because their teams struggled after MAJOR trades which were questionable then and seem silly now. Management is to blame here, not the coaches.

All it means is that some other lucky teams get to pounce and get some pretty good dang coaches.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on May 1, 2008 3:34 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just don't think this narrative

that they were screwed by their front offices with these midseason trades is true.

1) Kidd trade. The reason why everyone killed the trade at the time is because Harris is younger and has more good years left. Even while Kidd was coasting in NJ, he was still having at least as good a year as Harris, but the point is that he only has a year or two left, Harris has like 5+. But the trade for this year only shouldn’t have made the mavs so much worse.

But the Kidd trade went much worse than expected, partly because Avery was resistant to changing his overall offensive scheme to accommodate Jason’s talents. Jason’s been in the league for 15 years, we know what his strengths are. He’s a running, fast breaking, rebounding, defending point guard. He’s lost a step especially after the microfracture, but he’s still been effective guarding everyone except the speediest guards of the league. He’s a pretty poor percentage shooter.

So what does Avery do? Keep the same playbook, where Dirk initiates the offense from the high post and kicks out to spot up shooters or isos terry and he goes one on one. And continues to enforce the slow plodding pace he had before. It’s inane. It’s like Avery didn’t like the trade, and went out of his way to make sure it failed, to prove his point.

And his handling of adversity was bad. He throws his players under the bus, he whistles past the graveyard, he doesn’t make the right types of moves in response to what’s going on out there, etc.

2) The Shaq version of the Suns was good enough to build double digit leads in almost every game against the Spurs. But when the Spurs made their run in each game, Dantoni didn’t do the right things to stop those runs. Change defensive sets, find the right offensive options when the Spurs were shutting down what the Suns were running. Every time, the Suns just looked confused and almost panicked on the court. The only coaching Dantoni would do during these runs is yell at the refs about how they were getting screwed. You can’t tell me that if your roster is good enough to run up 20 point leads in a quarter against the Spurs, the problem is the roster.

by howlingfantods on May 1, 2008 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Suns Tightwad Ownership

Ownership is only part of the issue with the Suns. That the policy of selling 1st round picks for cash hindered their ability to build depth and thus help them have some gas in the tank for the playoffs is true. But much as you go into battle with the army that you have, not the army you wish you had, D’Antoni and his staff never really trusted the bench that they had, and never seemed to put any effort into making them better players in an effort to get anything out of them.

by tingeyga on May 1, 2008 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sort of with howlingfantods

Avery Johnson should have been fired. I blame him and the refs for the losing the finals to Miami. The next year, he made the mistake of making an adjustment to Golden State in the first game. Once Golden State smelled blood, it was over. This year, he ran into the hottest team in basketball and he choked facing Chris Paul. They need a change and he has to go.

Mike D’Antoni need to go for his sake. The owners traded away, or let go, important players and sold their draft picks. Losing in the first round has to be on the cheap owners. The desperation Shaq trade would not have had to happen, if the owners were not so cheap. He deserves to be in a better place.

Coaching changes are a part of the NBA. We all have to accept that a few of our beloved players will be traded and in two years, our dear coach will be fired, for a coach to get the team over the hump. My guess is that Larry Brown will be just about done in Charlotte and KP will completely purge the old regime and hire his own coach.

We can’t forget Flip Saunders, dollars to malasadas, he’ll be fired if Detroit does not win it all this year.

I realized that for a guy who jokes a lot, I’m pretty much a glass half empty kind of guy.

Mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe), mahna mahna, (ba debe dee), mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe badebe badebe dee dee de-de de-de-de)

by tominhawaii on May 1, 2008 4:35 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We Don't Need Larry

We could have used him three years ago but in two years we won’t need a guy who, whatever the results, championship or not, will leave at the most inoportune moment for another opportunity or because he is ready to psuedo-retire. Larry is obviously an accomplished coach but I can’t get past all the other garbage that comes along with him.

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on May 1, 2008 6:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

I was just joshing. But Nate needs to improve too, and if for some reason he stops improving, then his position should be evaluated and considered for an upgrade, just like all the players.

Mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe), mahna mahna, (ba debe dee), mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe badebe badebe dee dee de-de de-de-de)

by tominhawaii on May 1, 2008 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I lost track of the Larry Brown thread with you

You bring him up so much I started to think you might be serious about him being the coach we need.

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on May 1, 2008 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

He’s my go to cool coach. I should say Pop but he never changes jobs.

Mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe), mahna mahna, (ba debe dee), mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe badebe badebe dee dee de-de de-de-de)

by tominhawaii on May 2, 2008 12:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He has always seemed a bit flaky

but when he “retired” from Detroit and then came back almost immediately, I just couldn’t comprehend him at all. That doesn’t change the fact that he has created winners just about everywhere he has gone, he just never stays put and that makes me not a big fan.

It sounds like you have done your share of moving around so maybe you can relate to that more than I can.

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on May 10, 2008 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would any of them like to be our new assistant coach?

Why bother going through the pressure of being a head coach for one of those other teams. They should want to get in on the ground floor of our millennium-long basketball dominance. It can only help their future coaching resume.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on May 1, 2008 6:22 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I for one

totally agree with your thoughts Dave. This is just patently ridiculous, unless these teams have got other head coaches lined up, then what the heck are they doing? Which coach is willing to put their career on the line and step into these situations, both coaches put together 50+ win teams and then all of a sudden they get the ax? Not cool. Does that mean if the team doesn’t win an NBA championship in their first year they will get the ax as well? Horrible decision and only the most desperate of coaches are going to step into a situation like this, where the front office will fire you unless you win an NBA championship. D’Antoni brought the fast break back to basketball, casual fans fell in love with the high flying suns, and then the front office decides shaq is the answer, and forces the caoch to fit him into the offensive and defensive schemes with 40 games left? Horrible decision, and when they hire a head coach next year with no NBA experience (because everyone who has coached in the NBA is smart enough to steer clear of these teams) they are going to flush their next several seasons down the toilet, along with the tail end of Nash, Nowitski, Shaq, and Kidd’s careers. The tombstone for these teams will read: We had a shot at being great, but out front office shot us in the foot first.

TheOdenator

by TheOdenator on May 1, 2008 7:55 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The trade dynamic for both teams.

As the post-mortems on the Suns setting have been rolling in from the national media,
there’s one very common thread: Since the Shaq trade, and especially in this Spoors series,
the Suns no longer played Suns basketball, they played team-with-Shaq basketball.

The details on D’Antoni’s impending departure all say as much, that he’s been frustrated
with how he’s been told to coach this team this year, especially with Shaq on it.
In fact, the SI McCallum story just details the impending rift, but never says if the impending split
will be a firing or a quitting; D’Antoni might fire the Suns for going against his style, NOT them firing HIM.

And then there’s Dallas; I noticed in TrueHoop today that, in his farewell speech,
Avery referred to Devin Harris as “his son”. It’s also been no secret that, all along,
Kidd’s playing style and Averys coaching style clash; that was anticipated before the trade even happened,
and ever since the trade, there’s been a lot of confirmation of that suspicion.
And even when Avery coaches Kidd in a how-Kidd-likes-to-be-coached manner,
that’s still NOT HOW Avery coaches.

Point being: When a team has an identity, and their coach is part (maybe even the source) of that identity,
trading for a big piece that contradicts that identity WILL CAUSE COACH TROUBLE.
Even if playing with that identity fails to contend for (let alone win) championships,
that team HAS THAT IDENTITY. Trying to make them something else on the fly (especially at the trade deadline!)
never really works (trades need to COMPLIMENT the existing team, not fundamentally CHANGE it);
more to the point, when you have a team that plays a certain way because it’s coached a certain way,
and management introduces a key component that represents not-that-way,
yer gonna alienate yer friggin coach! And >BOOM!< goes your identity, too.

You gotta dance with them who brung ya, play YOUR game, and just be yourself.
The reason the ride is now finally over for Dallas and Phoenix isn’t that they didn’t win;
it’s over, now, because they responded to not-winning by betraying themselves and renouncing their identity.

And the coach being gone is the first sure sign that THAT is what has happened:
The Suns and Mavs can’t stand to be the Suns and the Mavs anymore.
So they’ve opted to be NOBODY.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 1, 2008 8:23 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ad you think that's not a problem

that the coaches don’t try to maximize the tools they’ve got in front of them, either because they cant (dantoni) or they don’t want to (avery)?

I mean, Steve Kerr has what five rings from his years as a Jordan Bull and the Duncan Spurs. He saw that the Suns were never going to win unless they improved their rebounding and interior defense, so he went out and got someone who would shore up those problems. You think it’s appropriate to say that the coach should refuse or fail to have his team play defense or rebound?

by howlingfantods on May 1, 2008 8:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm kinda going past the blame thingy.

But quite frankly, if a team wants to change playing styles, especially when it’s been playing A Way for a while,
then they have to change coaches. What we’re seeing is just the “how” of the coaching change.

When the Suns and Mavs brought in Shaq and Kidd, it was a moment of ownership/management saying,
“We’ve been a certain thing, and it hasn’t been good enough for me. So now we’re gonna stop being That Thing”.

And at that point, the coach is doomedDoomedDOOOOOMMMMMED.

I don’t think the coach can (much less SHOULD) become the coach for the change in direction.
All he can do is avoid that situation to begin with – by winning more games, doing better in the playoffs.
There’s nothing he can (much less SHOULD) do afterwards to make up for that.
Avery needed to get more out of the Devin Harris line-up in the years before this year’s trade deadline, and he did not.
D’Antoni needed to get more out of the Shawn Marion Suns in the years before the deadline, and he did not.
So, their line-ups had key pieces parlayed into different-identity components,
and it went badly for the rest of the season, capped off with a brutal first-round exit, in both cases reminiscent
of a brutal exit the year before (Suns because of the Spurs, Mavs because of the first round).

But that ending was mere formality.
Letting it get to the point where the Suns would want to have Shaq, and the Mavs would want to have Kidd,
THAT is where both coaches put themselves in line for a departure now.

New approach dictates a new coach. Period.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 1, 2008 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I should add . . .

. . . in both cases (and most coaching-change situations), I view the break-up (in marriage terms)
not as someone getting dumped, but a couple going their separate ways.

For D’Antoni and the Suns, and for Avery and the Mavs, it was a no-fault divorce, due to “irreconcilable differences”.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 1, 2008 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just goes to show ...

how quickly these marriages can deteriorate. I would love to see KP as GM and Nate as coach around here for a VERY long time. It would be awesome to have a Jerry Sloan-like tenure at the coaching position. It’s sad to think that it’s much more realistic that the team and coach will sour on each other at some point in the next few years and someone will have to go …

by bfan on May 1, 2008 8:34 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I really like Nate

I think you’re right, that it is more likely that Nate has a few more years…however, I think Nate has more of a chance than most at a long tenure. He’s a good coach, helping out with team USA deffinately helps, and there isn’t a player on the team currently that would get into some feud with him and put up an altimatum.
But the important question to ask yourself when thinking about a coaching change is who is the replacement? We will see who these teams hire and then be able to judge if it was a good decision. Personally, I do not know of any better coaches out there.

Sometimes I feel like I'm going in different directions...

by porterfan30 on May 1, 2008 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, there's a key difference between the Suns and the Mavs.

In the Suns case, the front office guy who tried to change styles on him was a GM (Kerr) who had no real ties to D’Antoni.
The Suns’ equivalent to the Pritchard/Nate relationship was Colangelo/D’Antoni, and this was a post-Colangelo move.
You could argue that Colangelo never would have done this to D’Antoni, which bodes well for the Nate/Pritchard pairing.

But the Mavs’ equivalent to the Pritchard/Nate relationship is Cuban/Avery,
and it WAS Cuban who imposed a playing-style change on Avery ahead of jettisoning him.
If Cuban can fire Avery, then no coach’s relationship with his GM and/or owner is secure.

We’re kinda faced with contrary lessons here.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 1, 2008 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cuban didn't really

have a relationship with Avery either. He bought the team and inherited Nelly, with Avery being groomed as the replacement. He went along with it, but he didn’t pick them.

by howlingfantods on May 1, 2008 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cuban bought the team in 2000

Avery was still playing until about 03-04, and was a Spur in 2000. He was playing for the Mavs and was kinda being groomed to be an assistant coach type guy in 02’, then went to the Warriors and then retired and joined Nelly in Maverick land. Since Cuban has his hand on everything on his team, and he owned them before Avery joined them, I assume Cuban picked Avery.

Nelly started coaching the year Cuban bought the team, and I don’t know when one started coaching and when the team was bought, so I’m not sure if he completely inherited the team with Nelly OR bought the team and hired Nelly immediately.

Cuban had to have had some sort of relationship with Avery to let him take over for Nelly. He doesn’t seem like a “ohhh ok I’ll go with it” type of guy.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on May 2, 2008 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Team on the rise

Nate has improved the team record every year so far and the players are improving each season individually as well. For some it is still too slow, but next year will be a defining year for Nate. He will be coaching for an extension. Expectations will be higher, especially if KP pulls the trigger on a large scale trade this summer. The Blazer brass seem content over the growth so far but at some point improving will need to transform into contending. If that leap doesn’t happen, we will see if things sour.

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on May 1, 2008 6:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Every Team has their own goals....

Dave, based upon their records only I don’t think anyone would disagree with you that both of these coaches are getting a raw deal-however each team has their own goals and clearly Phoenix has not figured out how to beat San Antonio and Dallas has been bounced from the first round 2 years in a row.
Can they find a BETTER coach? Maybe not, however the voice will be different. If you listen to Kenny and Charles, they both agree that sometimes a new voice and new system become necessary as the old voice just gets stale. Avery had lost his players (see the Josh Howard birthday party and practice that he cancelled) and Mike D was the one that heavily pushed for the Shaq trade NOT Steve Kerr (In Kenny’s words.) Avery Johnson was not even surprised and agreed with the move himself.
They will land somewhere else and succeed, but I don’t think it’s as much about finding someone better, as it is about finding someone better for the talents of the club, or finding somene better to help usher in a new era. Clearly what both coaches and teams were doing was not working when building toward a championship, which was the real and only goal.
As Blazer fans it may be easy to say that we cannot believe this because our goal next season is to make the playoffs. But, what if we had a healthy Greg and Rudy and made a key trade for a great Veteran and won say, 41 games again and missed the playoffs? You can bet that Nate would be on the hot seat because he did not reach his goal of the playoffs.

by Keepportlandweird on May 1, 2008 9:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Hi Friend

Welcome to Blazers Edge. Are you Channing Frye?

Great comment too.

Mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe), mahna mahna, (ba debe dee), mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe badebe badebe dee dee de-de de-de-de)

by tominhawaii on May 2, 2008 2:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wondered the same thing. I just left his blog. He's got

some interesting video links on autism. The guy has a catholic mind. I hope he’s a Blazer until he’s a decrepit old man.

"We comin along." Travis Outlaw

by annthefan on May 2, 2008 3:02 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree totally...

The two coaches that had to make HUGE midseason adjustments are the two that get fired. Stupid. I hope KP can look at Utah and realize that when you get a very good coach, you keep them, through thick and thin. Once a good coach, always a good coach.

Now if the mavs and suns fell right out of the playoff race, I might understand the decisions better. But the fact is that the suns ran into the defending champs and Dallas ran into yet another matchup nightmare. Cuban should fire himself for trading his two best defenders(Harris, Diop) away for an aging point guard that doesnt fit his coaches system.

Perhaps the suns front office should remember what D’Antoni did for them. He brought a team that missed the playoffs in 03-04, under a different coach, to the western conference finals in 04-05, they lost to the spurs(who marched to a championship). The next year he went back to the western conference finals and lost to the mavs(who were about 50 horrendous calls short of a ring). The next season they were unfortunate enough to run into the spurs in the second round. After Horry-gate, they lost the series and the spurs marched to a championship. This year they lost to the spurs again, and once again, the spurs look poised for another championship run. You can blame D’Antoni for not beating the spurs, or you can tip your hat to a dynasty caliber team. Kerr says blame D’Antoni and I say blame the spurs for being too freaking good…

RUDY > MJ

by myemic23 on May 1, 2008 9:22 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Grass is always greener...

If you start winning, but don’t keep winning, look out.

Don’t worry about AJ or d’Antoni. Both, if they want, will be coaching in the league NEXT year, as there are several good jobs available. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Mitchell canned at Toronto sooner or later, as d’Antoni would be a perfect fit there and Coalengelo and he are tight. AJ would be a good coach for the Knicks, in the same vein that Nate M. is for the Blazers. It’s obvious that both teams (the Suns and the Mavs) dropped the ball on numerous occasions at an ownership/management level.

The Kidd trade was a huge mistake. AJ and his management haven’t been on the same page for a while. And Mark Cuban is starting to look and sound bored—a malady which is dangerous in an owner who owns the team for fun rather than profit; for other examples see the Maloofs, or PA a couple years ago.

The Shaq trade wasn’t much better. (Shaq played well, and the Matrix wanted out of Phoenix, so I’m not writing off this one as a disaster). If Robert $arver was willing to spend money, just think of how good the Suns could have been.

Both coaches have flaws; but other than perhaps Pops, which coach in the league doesn’t? They’re excellent pro coaches, and they’ll have no trouble finding work.

by EngineerScotty on May 1, 2008 9:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If there is any blame........

It should rest at the feet of Tony Parker and Chis Paul. They can make any opposing coach look folish. For Johnson, last year it was Baron Davis, the year before that D. Wade. For D’Antoni, a double dose of Tony Parker. The players that I just mentioned are the reasons that make this off season so vitally inportant to the development of our team. Speed kills, so lets go get some…........

2-4 the who

by 24thewho on May 1, 2008 10:03 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I really believe in what the Hornies are made of.

Dallas underachieved in the first place just by getting stuck playing them as a seven seed.
That’s the unspoken failure behind their first-round exit.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 1, 2008 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Coach and Management Egos

D’antoni doesn’t have the support of GM Kerr and Owner Sarver. There are clashing egos and philosophies within the Suns coaching and management. Long term, the management and coaching staff must have a similar vision or else it’ll inevitably end up in a firing of one or the other. It wouldn’t even matter if they are both regarded as one of the best at their jobs.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/jack_mccallum/04/29/playoffs0505/index.html

The Avery Johnson firing sounds like Mark Cuban grew weary of pathetic playoff performances and Avery’s inability to maximize the half-court offense with Kidd’s arrival. Avery dug his own grave with his team’s choke jobs in the playoffs, where coaches not just players are being judged.

BINGO, BANGO, BONGO

by blzrfan on May 1, 2008 10:14 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

FUN FACT!

Avery Johnson compiled a 23-24 PLAYOFF record as Mavericks’ head coach, AND his team has lost their last 12 of 15 games in the playoffs.

That’s what’s going on.

Another fun fact in regards to Avery… he has a huge ego that has prevented him from adapting to his players, and instead tried to get his players to adapt him. How do you not change your style of play with Jason Kidd on your team to make it a more fastbreak oriented offense? Instead, he had Kidd dribble up the ball, and set-up isolation plays for the other players – completely nullifying his impact.

On Monday, following Dallas being down 3-1 to the Hornets, Avery Johnson cancelled practice. Guess what the players did? They held a players only practice. That is the death of a coach. Time to move on.

by damir on May 1, 2008 10:39 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Objectives

Agree that both franchises will probably be worse off next year with different coaches. Key word is probably. Phoenix and Dallas have two options:

  • Status quo. Same coach, same players, likely same result.
  • Roll the dice and make changes in coaching or personnel. Even if these are 75% likely to blow up, there’s a 25% chance they’ll make you better, perhaps enough to put you over the top.

These franchises are willing to trade respectable also-ran status for possible embarrassment in the effort to eek out a slightly better OVERALL chance at a ring. On balance, this is probably a poor financial move for the teams, which goes to show that this isn’t strictly a business – owners do care about winning for its own sake.

I do have to agree that Phoenix blew it up too early. They weren’t true to their own essence and lost their identity in the process. For other teams, the desperate Western conference arms race is a bit heartening to see. The organizations are leaving it “all out on the floor”, not just the players.

by Engineering Problem on May 1, 2008 10:54 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

But they DON'T have the status-quo/same-players option.

That would mean getting Devin Harris and Shawn Marion back,
players whose skills and history are part of the essential nature of the Mavs and Suns.

Both teams already chose option #2 near the trade deadline, and can not go back.
These coaches being ousted are just follow-up to that earlier decision.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 1, 2008 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Clarification

My mistake – I meant to say Phoenix and Dallas HAD two options. Past tense. My main point is that going from also-ran to championship has significant downside risk and it’s admirable that teams are willing to take it…

by Engineering Problem on May 1, 2008 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only reason

that Phoenix had to go “from also-ran to championship”, as you reference the Shaq deal, was that Sarver was too cheap to: a, keep Joe Johnson; b, keep a plethora of first-round picks; c, keep Kurt Thomas. The Suns gutted their potential bench over a period of years to save a few million bucks here or there. The Suns’ organization absolutely did NOT leave “it all out on the floor” like you said in your first post, and they consistently fell just short of the brass ring because of it.

by BlazersOrBust on May 1, 2008 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oops

I think I misunderstood you. Feel free to ignore me if I did.

by BlazersOrBust on May 1, 2008 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

theoretical mathematicans?

Is there another kind?

Any doctoral-level theoretical mathematician worth his spectacles could tell you that’s nearly three out of every four games this guy won.

Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.

by jonestr on May 1, 2008 11:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

remember Dunleavy?

This debacle reminded me of the Dunleavy firing after the Blazers surprised everyone by almost beating LA in 2000. I was mad at the time, and Cheeks certainly didn’t do as well as Dunleavy (except for the great PR moment w/ the national anthem). But think about it this way: what if we kept Dunleavy, kept overpaying for veterans who couldn’t put us over the top, and never got any good draft picks? We’d be like the LA Clippers the last couple of years: solid but not top-tier coach, good players who can’t get past the conference semis against Kobe or Duncan, and a couple of injuries away from totally falling apart.
In our case, management made the decision that Dunleavy and our Trader Bob strategy wasn’t going to work, so we had to eat some of the bad contracts and try to rebuild. The problem was we thought that we could rebuild around Darius Miles and Sebastian Telfair. Whoops. Fortunately KP came in and set that straight.
We’ll see if Steve Kerr and Cuban/Nelson go the same route. I do believe that neither of these teams have what it takes right now to contend for a title, trade or no trade. Both trades were high-risk gambles that didn’t pay off and generated a lot of buzz. In the Suns’ case, they’re pretty much stuck giving it another shot with this roster next year, which is why the D’Antoni firing doesn’t make sense to me. No matter the coach, Steve Nash will not play defense. They need an absurdly efficient offense to compete.
The Mavs, on the other hand, have Kidd’s expiring contract and the chance to really retool around Nowitzki. We’ll see if they’re smart about managing it, but it seems like they have the opportunity to shape their next direction and find a coach who fits that.
Both of these teams have real gems in Amare and Dirk to build around. We’ll see if they can figure out how to make it work.

by kickbrass on May 1, 2008 1:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yep

As I was reading the comments, I started to think that both these teams, seem a bit like the Blazers, back when they were trying to compete with the L@kers and counter Shaq.

Mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe), mahna mahna, (ba debe dee), mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe badebe badebe dee dee de-de de-de-de)

by tominhawaii on May 1, 2008 4:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please tell this newcomer

what the anthem moment was. I didn’t pay close enough attention to the Blazers back then to have it be memorable, sorry longtimers.

Perfect practice makes perfect.

by Ojala John on May 1, 2008 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A 13 or 14 year old girl was singing the nat'l anthem

before a game and forgot the words. she sort of lost it and was very near tears when Mo Cheeks stepped up, put his arm around her, and they finished the song together. It was really quite moving and I actually tear up a little as I think about it now. I believe it had nothing at all to do with PR and everything to do with Mo being just a really good guy. It’s really kind of a great moment in Blazer history. Here is a link. I hope it works.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4880PJnO2E

"We comin along." Travis Outlaw

by annthefan on May 2, 2008 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh Man

I almost made a Roger Clemens joke. You know he likes young singers.

Mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe), mahna mahna, (ba debe dee), mahna mahna, (ba dee bedebe badebe badebe dee dee de-de de-de-de)

by tominhawaii on May 2, 2008 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but he needs "performance enhancement" drugs

to say “tuned up” for the the young warblers. See? And you thought it was so he could play better baseball.

"We comin along." Travis Outlaw

by annthefan on May 2, 2008 1:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice

I like it.

Phoenix and Dallas can both pin a lot of blame on their owners, their front offices, and their not-quite-good-enough group of players. D’Antoni is annoying with all his whining, but he’s a decent coach. Somewhat the same for Avery.

Nash, Amare, and Nowitski play little to no defense. And they ARE YOUR ‘SUPERSTARS’. Remember Zach Randolph? Remember how much better we are without Zach Randolph? You don’t win titles by scoring and forgetting about defense. Doesn’t happen. Adding two over-the-hill former superstars obviously wasn’t the answer for either team either.

On the bright side, I’m thrilled because I’m a Blazer fan. Two less teams to have to worry about.

by leeroyjenkins on May 1, 2008 2:38 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I cant/have to blame Cuban

for Avery needing to go. I dont think that the Kidd trade is the issue here. Kidd is known to be a “coach on the floor” type player. He is beloved by all of the greatest players in the game and there is good reason for that. Unfortunately the systems that he has been successful in have featured pushing the ball and letting him be creative. Avery is called the little general for a reason. He runs a tight ship…....his way. Now he didnt choose the Kidd trade, but he seemed unwilling or clueless to how to use Jason in the Mavs offensive/defensive scheme.
Now, the trade happened and there needs to be adjustments that Avery doesnt seem willing to make. Now Jerry Sloan would probably make those cahnges….....and he has an ownership group that understands him and his style.
Mark Cuban has wanted to put his stamp on this team since he bought it. He is now a household name and spent some of his multi-millions on over the hill household names to play cheerleaders on the end of the bench. (Juwan Howard, Devean George, Malik Allen, Jamaal Magloire, Jerry Stackhouse, Tyronn Lue, Eddie Jones) Meanwhile Brandon Bass is barely making a million bucks and arguably was the most consistant player through their playoff loss to the Hornets.


Mark is leasing this damn team. where will this team be in three years…........in wheelchairs. Unless he can pull off some magic.
If I were him I would try and snag D’antoni and give the Nowitzki, Kidd tandem some run before blowing the whole thing up and starting over.

by DropstepJ on May 1, 2008 2:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I meant to say

Jerry Sloan would NOT make those changes.

by DropstepJ on May 1, 2008 2:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Cuban Should Coach

It’s pretty clear to me that both coaches have been made scapegoats after the front office made highly questionable (panic) trades mid-season. I think Mark Cuban should either coach his team himself or suit up and relieve Jason Kidd of his point guard duties. Oh well. At least I am a Blazers fan.

by kenzc76 on May 1, 2008 3:06 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

i dunno

i think mike got fired not cuz of the first rd exit, but his class with the owner and kerr. reminds me of marty shottenheimer with the SD chargers last year.

by Philthyanimal on May 1, 2008 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Suns

I don’t understand why PHX didn’t keep Kurt Thomas and went centerless for most of the year only to get Shaq as a desperate attempt to beat SA and keep up with LA after the Gasol trade. Well I guess that wouldn’t have changed much since the Marion situation might not have panned out had they kept him.

by Philthyanimal on May 1, 2008 8:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No kidding!

Oh, they don’t want Kurt Thomas, because his slow, halfcourt, in-the-post style doesn’t fir the Phoenix model,
and besides, he costs too much—and then they get SHAQ?!?

I guess halfway through the season, they simply changed their minds on who they wanted to be,
and immediately obtained an exaggerated version of what they had rejected in the off-season.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on May 2, 2008 5:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blazers do not need to be in the market for a coach.

by justin3007 on May 2, 2008 6:22 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with a lot of the comments defending the changes.

I’d just add that Avery’s comments in last few days really increase my impression that he does have a overly huge ego and is a blame shifter and has failed with several players. I do not expect him to repeat the win % he had in his golden opportuity. He is probably a top 10 coach but he will have to prove it at next stop and with his terrible playoff record in last few years he is definitely not a top 5 guy to me though he comes off as thinking he certainly is..

by outsider on May 2, 2008 10:51 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Here is a recap of the recent history of the Suns

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/080501

Spoiler….It is a piece by Bill Simmons.

"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and miss" Robert A. Heinlein

by 92wastheyear on May 3, 2008 11:46 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I will try that link again

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/index

Ok….fine!!! Click on the Simmons link

"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and miss" Robert A. Heinlein

by 92wastheyear on May 3, 2008 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images-2_small
At what point do we admit we are being out-coached?
Un_bohemien_small
Is Roy a Good Teammate?
Kpavatar2_small
Just Another Junk In The Wall:  11-18-09
Terryporter_small
Blazers Edge Community Podcast Episode 008
Small
Why is the Blazers’ offense bad this year? Why is the defense so good?

Recent FanPosts

Small
From Benefit of the Doubt to Just Plain Doubt.
Un_bohemien_small
Is Joe Johnson a Good Teammate (Roy Revisited)
Small
December contest......Win a Blazers jersey or hoodie
Small
BYRON SCOTT OFFENSIVE INSPIRATION
Small
game changing stretch of the 2nd quarter
Small
Nate McMillan: Mediocre Coach or Evil Genius?
Small
Junk Drawer 11/21 Dun dun dun
Small
Blake: Breaking Up Is Hard To Do
Portland-trail-blazers_small
Individual Observations - Little Mac

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

A modest proposal: Fire Mike Rice and Antonio Harvey!
For Ann, and Travis.
FREE GREG ODEN
"It's been good for us," Oden said. "We're going to stick with it. We have...

Recent FanShots

2 Tix for tonight v. Wolves for $40
Anyone who is sad from yesterday's game
Greg Oden with a Kimbo Slice/Baron Davis beard. What do you think?
Andre Miller is tough
Michael Jordan says "don't retire my number"
Charles Oakley to the Blazers? He says there are talks
Lamarcus: The King Cobra?
Surprising Stats from Basketball-Reference
Oden #5 and Rudy #9 ranked soph espn.com
NYT: The Pick-And-Roll is the NBA's Old Reliable

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm