Clay Bennett Interview
There has been a lot of discussion throughout the NBA about the whole Seattle-Oklahoma City issue. There's been a lot going on, especially in the last week of the season. With the owners voting yesterday (28-2) to allow the move the Sonics to Oklahoma City. I applaud both Paul Allen and Mark Cuban making a stand and voting against the move, but in the light of the litigation that the Sonic's ownership is facing the vote should have been postponed until the legal issues were worked out. Stupid move on David Stern's part, especially should the Bennett and Co. lose the litigation and be forced to stay in Seattle until 2010.
While I am not a fan of Bennett and Co.'s tactics to move the Sonics, as it bodes poorly for other NBA franchises and their fans, I went searching for info from another side of the issue. I came across a Clay Bennett interview on the Sonic's website talking about the vote to move the franchise.
After reading this I am not convinced that Seattle is going to win their last ditch effort to keep the Sonics in town, even for a short while longer. Bennett talks about how his e-mails were misconstrued, which any source, including the media, if it fits their goal. Bennett represented himself well, but I am on the fence as to whether Bennett and Co. are evil, for lack of a better term, for what they are doing to Sonic fans. Did Bennett and Co. create the disconnect between ownership and the city of Seattle just to accelerate the process of moving the team to Oklahoma City? Maybe so, maybe no. Either way it is looking worse and worse for Seattle fans.
0 recs |
9
comments
Read Related
Comments
Cl*y B%nn$t is an @@@@%%$$$$
Can’t stand the guy. Won’t read his stinkin interview. Won’t even say his name. Greedy anti-community scumbag. They oughta have a ceremony at the Seattle arena where they utter an oath of imprecation and lower candles slowly over a vat of pig’s blood until the light is all extinguished and then everyone files out silently and never acknowledges his existence ever again.
Nature bats last.
by fisheyes on Apr 19, 2008 8:24 PM PDT 0 recs
WORD
From now on all Bedgers should treat C@#y B%$#@ts name just like we do the L*k@rs and K&by. After a while we will forget the way those jerks spell it. I am already starting to forget how to spell C@bi…
43:12 Min, 9-18 FG, 4-5 FT, +14 +/-, 4 Off, 16 Rebs, 1 Ast, 1 Stl, 1 Blk, 22 Pts - LMA vs LA 4-8-08
by LaMarvelous on
Apr 19, 2008 9:40 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I read the whole interview
He obviously is a very impassioned guy who just has to uphold a lie every time he speaks.
It sucks for him…..it sucks for us.
and…....I agree that the political situation in Seattle had reached a point where it was no longer a NBA friendly city.
There is still major discussions about the impact of public spending and tax subsidies on professional sports in Seattle. As you know Seattle is a very liberal town, and in this time of economic downturn people are starting to prioritize what they spend their money on.
The school system has been marginalized, traffic is still a major issue.
I think that this Sale of the team to an all Oklahoman group (who have a state of the art stadium and good ol boy network) couldnt have come at a worse time for Seattle.
Sure Clay Bennett is lying. But…. Howard Schultz is the one who bailed on Seattle. He knew very well the political climate in Seattle. Why do you think he sold the team?
he certainly didnt need the money.
by DropstepJ on Apr 19, 2008 11:33 PM PDT 0 recs
It wasn't an NBA-friendly thing...
I live up here. It was people fed up with being forced, tricked or swindled into paying for a new arena for a professional sports team – especially one still paying off the debt on its existing arena. The way that Safeco Field and Qwest Field were funded by the public left a very bad taste in both Seattle and Washington’s mouths. If the Sonics had gotten their rebuild prior to Qwest field, then we’d be talking about how Seattle was an NFL-unfriendly town. It’s truly unfortunate (especially since personally I could give a rat’s hiney about the Seachickens, but will miss being able to watch Portland play Seattle). Thankfully, I’m a PTB fan first and foremost, so this isn’t a huge blow to me, but more of a disappointment.
On the plus side, the Storm are staying, so I’ll be able to take my daughter to games when she gets a bit older (she’s only 4 – I’m afraid she’d get bored).
by DonkeyShins on
Apr 20, 2008 12:14 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Bennett's pants are on fire!
But the real villain here to me is Howard Shultz. What we all knew as soon as it was revealed that the ownership had been transferred to an OKC group was the same thing Shultz must have known and therefore he also wanted us to believe Bennett’s lies. Howard’s lawsuit is laughable and attempts to save face but it also does not pass the smell test.
Starbucks? No thanks for me!
The other villain is David Stern. Stern promised OKC a team of their own when they agreed to house the Hornets for a year (turned into two). At that time the Sonics had not been sold and yet Stern promised them an existing team (not an expansion team). Stern delivered on that promise. His dirty hand prints are all over this process.
I don’t want to boycott the NBA but Mark Cuban and Paul Allen can begin to take back the league for the owners today and remove some of the dictatorial power given to David Stern.
Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."
by lee3022 on Apr 20, 2008 12:03 AM PDT 0 recs
I also agree
that Howie is the real villian here. He knew who he was selling the team to. I also think Bennett and his crew are lying no good a holes, and I hope the team sucks for years to come. I hope Durant never gets better, and I hope the team gets moved somewhere else in 10 years because no ones going to the games. This almost could have happened to us, and what a damn shame it would have been. Thank God PA woke up and realized to give it one more try, thank God.
by mark twain on
Apr 20, 2008 9:12 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Could you post some evidence of this
I had not heard about Stern promising OKC a team. If you have some articles that state this it would be very interesting.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on
Apr 20, 2008 12:53 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Questions about the Hornets stay in OKC
Much has been made of the support OKC gave the Hornets when they were marooned there, but I’ve also heard that the tickets were sold at well below the regular price of tickets and that big chunks were given away. Does anyone know if this actually occured?
Also, it is same lease now as when Bnnt bought the team – he knew it, Stern knew it, maybe Schultz. It is wretched.
by Honka Playboy on Apr 20, 2008 10:36 PM PDT 0 recs
How many of you have ever actually
lost a team?
Who hear has seen the team they grew up watching get relocated, or worse, bought by out of town interests and then moved?
Having had it happen, I can understand Sonics fans being emotional about it. The sense of impending loss is front and center, preventing them from acknowledging certain facts and realities. But for the rest of you, what is your excuse to act like a spoiled, immature little kid? What’s with the name calling? What has Clay Bennett done to you that justifies the sort of comments that occassionally border on vile?
All Clay Bennett has done is buy something that was for sale. The moment Schultz sold the team to an out of town ownership group, everybody knew the team was gone. The only possibility of keeping the team rested in the city and the state funding a new facility – something that everyone knew was not going to happen.
If you want to throw darts at folks, try Schultz, for selling to an out of town group. Or those nice rich folks in Seattle, who came forward after the horse had escaped the barn and offered to buy the team. Or even those politicians, like the Governor or the two US Senators, who are all jumping on the bandwagon now, after seeing the publicity this issue is getting. How about asking them the $500 million dollar question? As in “Where were you when it counted?”
I’m not here to defend Clay Bennett. But honestly, has he done something that most of us wouldn’t do, if the opportunity presented itself? What if Paul Allen moved the Blazers to Seattle tomorrow. How many here would say no to buying the Hornets or Grizzilys or Bobcats if they suddenly had $300 – $400 million in the bank?
Most of the stuff you hear about lying or acting in bad faith is pr propaganda. I repeat – everybody knew the score when the team was sold to Bennett. All this last minute wailing is mostly to save face.
by timg56 on Apr 21, 2008 6:24 AM PDT 0 recs








