Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Top Eleven Significant Events of 2007-2008 (10% cooler than your average Top Ten!)

To start our season recap, here is the Blazersedge version of the Top Ten Eleven Significant Events of 2007-08. Don’t forget to check out the Oregonian’s version too, as cited by Ben in the post below. It is excellent!

11. Lamarcus Aldridge Plays a Whole Season

"What?" you say. "What kind of Top Eleven event is that?" Keep in mind where we came from though. When you heard he had Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome last season, didn’t a part of you say, "Professional athletes and heart conditions don’t always mix"? Even if you discount that, let’s consider the fact that Greg Oden’s injury meant more minutes against big men and premium defenders for LMA. Though he bulked up over the summer it became apparent as soon as he took the court against genuine NBA behemoths that his body still wasn’t all the way there. How long it was going to take him to get pancaked was a legitimate question at the beginning of the season, as were his endurance and ability to respond. 76-games-played later some of those questions have been answered. Lamarcus is never going to be smaller than he is right now and he did just fine. 17.8 ppg and 7.6 rebounds is not bad for a second-year forward still finding his way. He scored in double figures in 67 of those games, topping 20 points 34 times, or just over half of the times he played.

10. Rudymania Hits Portland

It’s weird to have a Top Ten item involve a player who isn’t even part of the team, but there’s no denying that part of the optimism surrounding Portland’s future involves the best player in the Euro leagues right now. Rudy averaged 15 ppg in 22.5 minutes played on 56% shooting and 39% from distance in the ULEB cup. That, plus his YouTube drives, has folks fired up a little. Many in the know are cautious, citing the adjustment period for anybody entering the NBA from any other league. There’s no telling what kind of contribution he will make if and when he comes to Portland. But if there is an X-Factor who could accelerate the Blazers’ rise to where they’re already headed, bringing success earlier than imagined, it’s Fernandez. Many are hoping the 24th pick of the 2007 NBA Draft has a disproportionate effect on the future of his team.

9. The Point Guard Pile

Basketball is a game of nuances. Success in the NBA isn’t as simple as it looks from behind a monitor. But sometimes your basic, knee-jerk reaction is correct. This isn’t an invitation to a political debate (so cool it) but take George W. for example. Back before he was elected many armchair pundits would have said if this guy gets in gas prices are going through the roof, we’re going back to war with Saddam, and the middle class is in trouble. Most political scientists would (correctly) say that’s far too simple of a correlation to draw. Each step of the way certain decisions made sense or had multiple reasons besides just the president. Nevertheless, here we are eight years later and…guess what?

When we signed Steve Blake last summer the simple response was, "Hey…nice player, but we have too many decent point guards and no really good ones." Throughout the course of the season we saw Blake play admirably and excel in many areas. Jarrett Jack also had his moments. But Jack also appeared shaken by the tide changing yet again at the position. Sergio Rodriguez barely got a chance at all. It’s hard to argue that at any step of the way anything happened that was wrong. Shuffling the three in different ways wouldn’t have led to more wins. But here we are at the end of the year with three point guards, each with certain skills, none of whom have anything resembling a dominant hold on the position.

Fortunately for the Blazers all of them are young and all of them are cheap. Any of them would be tradeable but there’s no significant cost in holding on to them if need be. It’s not like a rebellion is fomenting or this is ripping apart the team. But until the deck gets shuffled into a coherent hand or until an ace trump comes along to make the issue moot, this will continue to be a question mark and a story.

8. It’s a Bird…It’s a Plane…It’s…a Fish???

Memories are short, but at the start of the season many folks were openly questioning whether Travis Outlaw’s learning curve had fallen down a well. We had re-signed him to a modest contract and the relative bargain was the only thing that kept the voices from being louder. His once-legion of fans, enamored with his astounding vertical leap, had dwindled to a few. The masses engaged in shoulder shrugs accompanied by, "It would still be nice if…" at the mention of his name. Then all of a sudden, from deep under that manhole cover, came a rumbling. November 28th…26 points against Indiana. December 3rd…21 points and the game-winner against Memphis. December 6th…20 against Miami. December 9th…20 against Milwaukee. December 12th…22 against the Warriors. December 14th…21 against the Jazz. Oh my gosh, we’re winning. We’re WINNING! This guy in a cape flew out of that well over there and started pounding people over and over and over again in the fourth quarter! I don’t understand how he does it. He jumps and twists and leaps and he shouldn’t be able to hit those shots but…there he goes AGAIN! Yes, Super Trout! Yes!!!

Travis didn’t put together a consistent season, but he did average a career-high 13.3 points and 4.6 rebounds en route to becoming the poster child for the "You Need To Wait Five Years For Me" Foundation. His spate of explosions has left Blazer fans with visions of future 6th-Man-of-the-Year awards dancing in their heads.

7.  Sports Bars Cost Money and Make Me Fat!

Last summer the Blazers struck a deal with Comcast to be featured on a new sports channel.  The public line was simple:  more games, better coverage, in-depth access, better relationship between the network and the team.  Everybody wins, right?  Not quite.  Despite pre-season assurances that deals were immanent the pen never met the paper for most providers who could have picked up the channel.  If you lived in the area served by Comcast, which included most of Portland, and were willing to switch over to them you could see every Blazer game.  If you lived outside of Portland and were willing to fork out $169 for NBA League Pass to a satellite provider you could also see every game.  If you were in the limbo area not served by Comcast but close enough that the NBA's mandatory blackout rule applied to you, you saw very few Blazer games.  In fact there was no way you could see them legally.  If complaints are any measure, this disenfranchised half of the state.  As long as a deal gets done and some providers pick up the network this story will be a minor bump in the road.  If there's no coverage in much of Oregon when next year's season starts it's either going to get nasty or people are going to go back to doing whatever they were doing when the Blazers were pitiful and nobody wanted to see them.

6. The Streak

December was a great month for Portlanders. The recession was still three months away. Kristy Lee Cook had not yet been voted off of American Idol. (You’re welcome, Tom.) And the Blazers--yes, THOSE Blazers--rattled off a streak of 13 straight wins from Monday, December 3rd to Sunday, December 30th. They would end up going 17 for 18. The streak itself would be dwarfed by the 21-game run of the Houston Rockets later in the season. The Blazers would come back to earth and end up missing the playoffs by a substantial margin. But that glorious December left an imprint on the club and its fans. Not only was it the first winning month the team had posted in years, it was the first genuine butt-kicking we had been on the good side of since 2001. The streak showed everyone inside the locker room and out that the Blazers were for real, that winning basketball was not only a possibility but a probability, and that sunny forecasts for the team’s future were not just wishful thinking.

5. He Did It Playing WHAT?

The summer was so full of promise. The birds were singing. The crops were high. The ping-pong balls were bouncing just right. And then… What’s that snap, crackle, pop sound? That BETTER be a bowl of Rice Krispies you’re eating, Greg. Greg? Greg??? AWWWWWWWWWW…DANGIT!!!!!!

It would be impossible to describe the soul-sucking sound that swept through Blazer Nation with the news that Greg Oden had injured his knee, that it required microfracture surgery, and that he’d be out for the year. After all of that suffering we had done, and then the elation of the lottery win…now this? It felt like the biggest injustice since Princess Ardala tried to force Buck to marry her by orbiting a killer satellite right over New Chicago. That this isn’t higher on the list is a huge credit to the Blazers and what they managed to accomplish in spite of it, but if you’re looking for just one moment that changed the course of the season, this was it.

The following was clipped from the post-surgery addendum to Greg Oden's contract:

No pick-up games
No company softball games 
No getting up off your couch 
No Dance-Dance Revolution 
No Katamari Damacy either! You could trip on those things! 
No Skee-Ball 
No checkers (too much jumping) 
No thumb wrestling 
No sneezing 
No blinking 
No breathing

4. 41-41

After years of losing 50+ it’s amazing how good even .500 ball can look. It looks even better when you consider that this team was built around Greg Oden in the middle and instead of suiting up he spent the season shooting t-shirts into the crowd and trying to duck the Kiss Cam. If you look at the Western Conference and how many good teams there are there’s no way we should have been able to do what we did. That bodes well for the quality and commitment of our players. More than the streak, even, this number defines our season. It looks like we’ve emerged from the long tunnel and are back on track.

3. Hey Now, You’re an All-Star

It’s not so much that Brandon Roy made the All-Star team, nor that he excelled in the game. It wasn’t even the momentary rush the credit gave Portland fans. The All-Star nomination over players with better stats was a confirmation that Brandon’s advent isn’t illusion. 19.1 points, 5.8 assists, 4.7 rebounds…those are for real. So is his game, his stardom, and his ability to bend the game to his needs. We expected more from Brandon this year so his play doesn’t get the same kind of excited notice as Travis Outlaw’s or Lamarcus Aldridge’s. But when you see Brandon do what he does best there’s no doubt that he’s head and shoulders above anyone else on this team right now. His play--ranging from good to outright dominant--is the story of the season and the biggest reason we have right now for confidence in our future.

2. They Pick Up On Tuesday Around Here, Right?

Of all of the odious offenses of the Blazer Dark Years, the worst didn’t involve police investigations, film-room tantrums, or strip club antics. The most tangible lingering legacy of the Jailblazers was contractual. The fall of 2004 was like a black hole, inescapably sucking the Blazers’ future into a salary cap vortex. Theo Ratliff, Zach Randolph, Darius Miles…all three married to the team through enormous deals, all three considerable disappointments.

We managed to trade away Ratliff in the Roy deal, but with Zach still on the books and in the locker room none of the renovation (cap or culture) really mattered. Who can forget draft day last year, when Knicks fans hooted and howled at dumping Steve Francis and Channing Frye on us for Z-Bo? Even with having to eat the Francis contract for another year, we still managed to align our expiring contracts to give us a window of cap flexibility in the summer of 2009. Trading Randolph also cleared the way for the offensive revolution on the court and for Brandon and the young guys to take leadership roles in the locker room. It’s no overstatement to say that everything you enjoyed about the team this year in terms of unselfishness, ball-movement, commitment, hustle, camaraderie, and community example was made possible by this move. As our erstwhile broadcast team said in a moment of candor on-air late in the season, even if Channing Frye hadn’t panned out at all the Blazers got exactly what they wanted from that trade.

That would have been enough, but then late in the season we got the extra bonus of having Darius Miles’ contract come off of the books. Darius was nowhere near the influence that Zach was, nor was he playing. The on-court ramifications were basically nil. But that $9 million contract through 2010 was putting a lug nut in the Cheerios of our 2009 cap plan, causing us to make some uncomfortable decisions about keeping players versus signing free agents. That extra space either allows us to do some of each or allows us to make a run at a premium guy.

These bookend salary moves may not have appeared to obviously affect the course of the season, but long term they could end up being the most significant things that happened this year, but one…

 

1. With the Number One Pick of the 2007 NBA Draft the Portland Trail Blazers Select…

Sure, he was out all season. Yes, he had a sketchier Summer League than people anticipated. But make no mistake, this will go down as one of the most significant moves in franchise history as long as this guy stays healthy. He is, simply put, a Force. We’re going to talk about reasons the Blazers will make the playoffs next year and at least 80% of them revolve around Greg Oden. And this is NOT because Oden is going to come in and be overwhelmingly good, it’s because Oden is good in some very specific ways that our offense and defense open up. The transmission, chassis, wheels, and everything else are all set. We had to go with a secondary engine this year. Though Joel Przybilla did a magnificent job, our schemes aren’t set up to feature him. They’re set up to feature Greg. You are going to be amazed at how much room there is for him to alter the course of the game, even at this extremely early stage. And it only gets better from there.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

1 recs  |  Comment 40 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great post, Dave

I don’t even have a quibble this time. But I’d call your #11 “11.a”, and add an 11.b: “Brandon Roy Plays A Whole Season.”

Think back, Blazer fans. Remember Roy’s chronic heel injury that threatened to ruin the ‘07-’08 season? Many blazeredgers were furious that Roy hadn’t had heel surgery at the end of his rookie year, and some were calling for him to go ahead and have it at the beginning of this season. “Get it over with,” they said: “the season is lost anyway” (thanks to Oden’s injury).

Of course, that heel could still cause problems up the road. But at this point, at least, it appears that Roy and the Blazers’ conservative treatment of the heel was the right choice. This is particularly true in the light of the fact that there’s no guarantee the surgery wouldn’t end Roy’s career.

P.S. Dave: there’s a typo in your next-to-last sentence that you might want to fix.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 18, 2008 1:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Thank you!

I always appreciate the help. Fixed now.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 18, 2008 1:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did He?

I’d be hesitant to say he played through a whole season. Brandon had no serious injuries, but he limped through the last third (that’s being generous). I would say that there are still questions about Brandon’s durability, while those questions seemed to be answered for LMA.

by MavetheGreat on Apr 18, 2008 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point

But I’d suggest that Brandon wore down mainly because he had to carry so much of the load this season. Basically, if Roy didn’t take it to the hole relentlessly, the Blazers lost, and that took a toll. Fortunately, there’s help coming next season in Oden & (hopefully) Fernandez. Plus, Travis, Martell, and LMA all intend to work on their ball handling this offseason, while Roy is planning on improving his in-between game. All those factors should reduce the wear & tear on Roy’s body next season.

However, if those factors DON’T manifest themselves, I share your concern. A cautionary example is Dwayne Wade, whose game is similar to Roy’s in many respects (Wade himself called Roy, “A controlled me”). Wade had to take it to the hole again and again for the Heat to win, and his body finally broke down.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 18, 2008 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

The large portion of Roy’s injury woes began when his teammates stopped hitting shots. During the streak Roy never looked better, mostly because the players around him stood and delivered. I remember watching a game on TV about two weeks out of our huge run when my dad called and simply said, “Roy won’t pass anymore.” You know what? He was right. And soon after he started writhing on the Rose Garden parquet more than I would care for. Roy, that is, not my dad. Although I’d probably be more disturbed if it were my dad.

BLZRS FRVR

by nightbluefruit on Apr 18, 2008 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is all true

and I agree with it, but my original point was that it was hard to say that Roy played a complete season. If you count just suiting up, then yes, he played in most games (74), but he was limping around a lot, from illnesses and injuries.

by MavetheGreat on Apr 18, 2008 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then I agree and disagree

Yes, B-Roy did not play a complete season. I agree.

However, if you are saying we should keep our eyebrows raised about his durability, I have to marginally disagree. So long as either LMA or Oden turn into a serious sidekick for Roy he won’t have to kill himself with acrobatic drives every possession, which should ease what ails him.

BLZRS FRVR

by nightbluefruit on Apr 18, 2008 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Roy answered everyone's preseason question

That is, “Is his heel going to prevent him from playing a complete season.” The answer, at least for now, appears to be ,”No.” Yes, he got banged up from a variety of other minor injuries, but my point (and nightbluefruit’s, I believe) is that there’s no reason to think that’ll recur. Not with Oden & (hopefully) Rudy coming aboard, the other guys improving, and Roy himself improving his 3-point and in-between game.

There’s a reason few NBA players take it to the hole relentlessly night in and night out during the regular season. That is: to do so will inevitably get you injured (just look at Dwayne Wade). So Roy’s inability to play at full effectiveness for the entire season, considering how he was forced to play, is no reflection on his durability, IMO.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 18, 2008 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great stuff

Suppose you were Kevin Pritchard, and you looked at the 07-08 Blazers, and saw the strengths and weaknesses. Then you would go to the NBA Player Parts Store, and buy different pieces to make us better. You would every single one of those pieces that you want, mold them into a single player, and call him Greg Oden.

You are right, exactly right. Greg does not have to be great to make us great, because he is good where we are bad.

When I rule the world, Isiah Thomas will be coach and GM of the L*kers, who will be owned by someone who no one respects whose first initial is "J".

by jscot on Apr 18, 2008 1:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You might amend that to

two players if you include Rudy.

by jamon51 on Apr 18, 2008 9:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Rudy...

shows up and is as advertised, he will certainly improve the Blazers; but Oden will fix what ailed the Blazers specifically this year. When the jump shots are not falling, Rudy will have off nights too, the Blazers will have an inside option to pair with LMA to keep them in those games. The offensive rebounds for opposing teams that killed us in games where every possession was crucial will be minimalized. And with Joel or Oden on the floor for 48 minutes, there will be fewer uncontested drives to the hoop.

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on Apr 19, 2008 8:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great Job Dave

You’re good people in my book. Thanks for the AI reference. It took me forever to get to it because work kept getting in the way.

Your pal,

Tom

Ask not what Blazers Edge can do for you; ask what you can do for Blazers Edge.

by tominhawaii on Apr 18, 2008 2:46 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Great post, Dave

I got done reading and I was literally bouncing up and down on my couch from being so dang excited about next year. The salary cap space is great and probably deserves its lofty placement, but it’s a little bit harder to get pumped up about—like, I know theoretically now we can resign all of our guys and still land an impact free agent, but that’s like theoretically I’m gonna have presents under the tree at Christmas. You don’t really get tingly till you see them right there.

But adding Greg…there are two schools of thought about his next year here on BE: those who think he’ll be foul-plagued and struggle to reach 30 mins a game, and those who think he’s going to be a game-changing monster. Count me among the latter. EVERYWHERE we’re weak, we’ll improve—perimeter defense, forcing turnovers, interior defense, defensive rebounding.

I think Jscot’s prediction of 55 wins is pretty dang close. Write me down for 52 wins, the sixth seed, and the Honorary Golden State Warriors Title of “Team Nobody wants to face in Round 1.” I’m tickled pink. Everybody not a Blazers fan should be green with envy or seeing red. Cry till you’re blue in the face, losers! The dynasty starts now.

P.S. In #7, you want “imminent” and not “immanent”. Though I would have lost the bet if somebody had told me to wager on whether or not immanent was a word—it means indwelling, inherent, or intrinsic. Who knew?

by BlazersOrBust on Apr 18, 2008 2:58 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Immanence

is a relatively important theological concept.

Theologians will tell you that God is both immanent (near at hand, with us, reachable) yet transcendent (above us, beyond our grasp).

Imminence is also a theological concept referring to the return of Christ, but how you view this one varies significantly depending on your theological perspective.

T Darkstar will soon provide us with the Koine Greek terms for these (assuming there are such Greek terms).

And then we come to Eminence. That is one of my titles: Your Eminence. The reason for this is that my eminence emanates from me so magnificently that all are bound to acknowledge it.

When I rule the world, Isiah Thomas will be coach and GM of the L*kers, who will be owned by someone who no one respects whose first initial is "J".

by jscot on Apr 18, 2008 4:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm working on it.

But working backwards from English to Greek is harder than Greek to English. Since they are not Biblical terms but rather theological terms, the process is even longer. Hopefully, I will have something by the end of the day.

I love to talk theology, but this is a little more in-depth than I would normally do for this site, but a request from Jscot is not lightly ignored.

"A certain critic—for such men, I regret to say, do exist—made the nasty remark about my last novel that it contained ‘all the old Wodehouse characters under different names’. He has probably now been eaten by bears, like the children who made mock of the prophet Elisha: but if he still survives he will not be able to make a similar charge against Summer Lightning. With my superior intelligence, I have outgeneralled this man by putting in all the old Wodehouse characters under the same names. Pretty silly it will make him feel, I rather fancy." - P.G. Wodehouse

by T Darkstar on Apr 18, 2008 7:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As requested: Off-Topic Theological Treatise

This isn’t necessarily a topic which the Koine Greek comes in that handy. By the time these kind of controversies arose in the Western tradition, Latin was the dominant language, and the terms are couched in that language. I suppose if one wanted to reverse engineer it into Greek, the terms would likely be ενπορευομενος for immanentia and διαβαινομενος for transcendentia. But they have not really been argued in these terms before.

The immanence of God (immanentia Dei) and the transcendence of God (transcendentia Dei) are both directly linked to the omnipresence of God (omnipraesentia Dei). However, as Amlmart1 pointed out, immanentia and transcendentia do not initially seem compatible. Immanentia Dei refers to the presence of God everywhere. Prooftexts, if you’re into those kind of things (personally, I prefer larger contexts), are:

“Can a man hide himself in secret places so that I cannot see him? declares the Lord. Do I not fill heaven and earth? declares the Lord.” Jeremiah 23:24 (ESV)

“I ascend to heaven, you are there! If I make my bed in Sheol, you are there!” Psalm 139:8 (ESV)

However, that does not mean that since God is everywhere, that everything is God. This is why the transcendentia Dei is equally important. God does not become the creature, nor a part of the creature, but rather the creature is dependent on God for life, even existence.

“for ‘In him we live and move and have our being’; as even some of your own poets have said, "‘For we are indeed his offspring.’” Acts 17:28 (ESV)

“and he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.” Colossians 1:17 (ESV)

The 17th Century theologian, Paul Gerhardt, put it this way: “God is everywhere present, not συνεχτως, so that He is contained, but συνεχτιχως, so that He comprehends and contains all things.”

This may come across as a paradox. And it would not be the only one. Absolute love and absolute justice would also not seem to be able to co-exist. I don’t know how to resolve them, nor does it particularly bother me that I can’t. When dealing with a being that stands outside the laws of time and space, the only things that can be known about that being are what that being reveals about Himself. But now we are leaving the realm of explanation and entering into the realm of apologetics.

"A certain critic—for such men, I regret to say, do exist—made the nasty remark about my last novel that it contained ‘all the old Wodehouse characters under different names’. He has probably now been eaten by bears, like the children who made mock of the prophet Elisha: but if he still survives he will not be able to make a similar charge against Summer Lightning. With my superior intelligence, I have outgeneralled this man by putting in all the old Wodehouse characters under the same names. Pretty silly it will make him feel, I rather fancy." - P.G. Wodehouse

by T Darkstar on Apr 18, 2008 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good stuff

This is all really intended to help get you ready for those systematic theology exams.

Blazer’s Edge—all things to all people.

When I rule the world, Isiah Thomas will be coach and GM of the L*kers, who will be owned by someone who no one respects whose first initial is "J".

by jscot on Apr 18, 2008 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Inmanente in Spanish

Immanent, from Latin “inmanere”, means the opposed to transcendent, and designates the activity or action of the agent which comes from him and have its aim at himself, “remain”, therefore, in the interior of the person running, not depending on nothing outside the agent.

Tell me with whom you walk and I will tell you who you are.

by amlmart1 on Apr 18, 2008 5:14 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're on to something here.

Though I am still trying to sort it all out.

"A certain critic—for such men, I regret to say, do exist—made the nasty remark about my last novel that it contained ‘all the old Wodehouse characters under different names’. He has probably now been eaten by bears, like the children who made mock of the prophet Elisha: but if he still survives he will not be able to make a similar charge against Summer Lightning. With my superior intelligence, I have outgeneralled this man by putting in all the old Wodehouse characters under the same names. Pretty silly it will make him feel, I rather fancy." - P.G. Wodehouse

by T Darkstar on Apr 18, 2008 7:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

2 schools

I wonder if you’re two schools of thought on G.O. are mutually exclusive. I tend to find myself in both camps!

by MavetheGreat on Apr 18, 2008 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Me too

I think he’ll have quite a bit of trouble with fouls. But not so much he won’t be able to stay on the court for 30 mpg, and he’ll also be scary good a lot quicker than people think.

When I rule the world, Isiah Thomas will be coach and GM of the L*kers, who will be owned by someone who no one respects whose first initial is "J".

by jscot on Apr 18, 2008 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I notice a trend....

Liberace yesterday, Village People today? Not that there is anything wrong with that. Great post Dave, lots of fun!

2-4 the who

by 24thewho on Apr 18, 2008 7:53 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It's a minor point - but "years of losing"?

I think one of the most amazing aspects of the Blazers has been how quickly they’ve managed to rebuild.

The Bulls had 6 losing seasons post Jordan before cracking the .500 mark. Atlanta’s streak before this season was 9 years. The Celtics have had only 3 winning seasons in the past 14 years.

Meanwhile we experienced only 3 years of losing, the last of which was arguably positive in the fact that the team made an 11 win improvement and looked to be headed even further up. Before the losing streak you have to go back 20 years, to the year I moved to Portland, to find a Blazer team that had a losing record.

Blazer fans should consider themselves some of the most fortunate of sports fans in having had such a long run of winning, competative teams. And the really great thing is, it looks like it is about to start all over again.

by timg56 on Apr 18, 2008 8:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Ownership is key

I think what separates Paul Allen from many other owners is that when it comes to the Blazers, Allen is a basketball fan 1st and a businessman 2nd. It seemed like the “Jailblazer” jokes got to him eventually and he lost the love of the game for a bit which caused the team to go into a bit of a spin. Now it seems that he has regained his fanhood and isn’t afraid of spending money to improve the team (things like spending cold hard cash to obtain the rights to players like Rudy and Sergio). In this way he is like Mark Cuban, whose ownership pulled the Mavs out of the bottom of the league.

Constrast this with the ownership situation in Atlanta where there is a serious rift among the 3 principal owners, or in Chicago where the mantra was “players don’t win championships, organizations win championships”.

by tingeyga on Apr 18, 2008 5:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Dave

This was a great list, the future is so bright! I’ll never forget all the dumb New Yorkers going all crazy excited when they got Randolph like they pulled off some major coue… all i can say is ha ha ha!

by mark twain on Apr 18, 2008 8:57 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

"A younger...youthier...player in Zach Randolph"

That …my friends….is a classic line. Geez…Starbury needs to start taking his meds again…seriously

"Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors... and miss" Robert A. Heinlein

by 92wastheyear on Apr 18, 2008 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wonderful!

I could understand Knick fans (e.g., Spike Lee) not recognizing the fundamental incompatibility of Zach and Curry. The supposed sophistication of NY fans is so much hype. But it’s truly remarkable that an NBA point guard would fail to see the folly of that trade. Then again, this isn’t just any NBA point guard, is it??

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 18, 2008 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good list Dave

You covered pretty much all of it.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Apr 18, 2008 10:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

*22

Rockets won 22 in their streak

by MavetheGreat on Apr 18, 2008 10:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

OK, you forgot one

Dave, on thinking further, I really think you need a 12th “Significant Event of 2007-2008”: Joel Przybilla’s off-season transformation.

It’s difficult for us now to remember just how bad Joel’s ‘06-’07 season was-or to imagine what this season would have looked like had Joel suffered a repeat. After Joel’s ‘06-07 nightmare, most guys with guaranteed contracts would have just licked their wounds thru the off-season. But Joel’s reaction was the complete opposite: he dedicated himself to arriving at training camp in the best shape of his career-and with a revamped free-throw shooting stroke to boot. (Reportedly, Joel’s wife gave him a helpful push.)

I remember hearing Joel talk about all this just prior to training camp. I thought, “Wow, that’s great—if Joel really can play better and stay healthy, he’ll be a dynamite back-up to Oden this season.” But when Oden went down, the perspective changed to, “Uh, oh: if Joel doesn’t play better and stay healthy, the Blazers are truly screwed!”

Thank God Joel did what he did in the off-season; really, he saved the year for the Blazers. That’s gotta qualify as one of the most significant events of the Blazers’ season, IMO.

"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla

by hurryup09 on Apr 18, 2008 11:32 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yep

Without Joel’s improvement, the other Blazers may have shown individual improvement throughout the season but the team most likely takes a step back in wins. (Unless of course Channing averages a double-double for the season.)

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on Apr 19, 2008 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Word

Joel need’s an honorable mention at least. The guy was a beast this season and was basicly the heart of the team.

"The next day in practice, if you sweat, it's going to come out of your pores, regardless. If you ask any coach around the league how many times they have smelled liquor on a player . . . As long as that player is showing up on time, doing the drills and running, that's part of it. But there have been times, yeah. Yeah, you probably smelled liquor on me. But it's not like I'm at practice drunk. I'm totally focused."
-Darius Miles

by Steve Guttenberg on Apr 18, 2008 2:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

What about

The Incredible Rose Garden Crowd! the Fans are back! how many straight sellouts? like 23? many many standing room only games, and so much excitement in the Rose Garden you can’t even hear anything!

by Blazerhopeful on Apr 18, 2008 5:04 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I LOVE the Katamari Daimacy reference

Caught it this time through. Nothing quite like rolling things (and people!) up into a ball, shooting them off into space and igniting a new star from the mass.

So much fun. So little time.

"A certain critic—for such men, I regret to say, do exist—made the nasty remark about my last novel that it contained ‘all the old Wodehouse characters under different names’. He has probably now been eaten by bears, like the children who made mock of the prophet Elisha: but if he still survives he will not be able to make a similar charge against Summer Lightning. With my superior intelligence, I have outgeneralled this man by putting in all the old Wodehouse characters under the same names. Pretty silly it will make him feel, I rather fancy." - P.G. Wodehouse

by T Darkstar on Apr 18, 2008 5:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Blazers thank you video

http://www.nba.com/blazers/fans/Thank_You_Fans-267478-1179.html

This was clearly shot sometime in January. Brandon’s still got the black eye, Channing still has hair. I know they have to shoot these ahead of time, but to have them saying things like, it was a great season, with half the season left, is kind of odd. Maybe after the streak they figured it would have to be a great season.
Maybe they recorded it two ways, once where they said, it’s been a tough season, but you stuck with us.
Sometimes the Blazers seem a little over the top with the awkward player videos.

But notice that Joel pronounces the y in his name.

by Section323 on Apr 19, 2008 3:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice retrospective

Perhaps the best feeling is the feeling of beginning and not ending at this point in the season this year. Someone commented that we only had 3 years of ruling and I take his point. But we had 30 years since our championship and everything else is losing so I take Dave’s point in its broader perspective as well.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Apr 20, 2008 12:12 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

When you go through

an era that pretty much rips the heart of your franchise and community like the Jailblazer years did to us it’s like dog years. Every losing season counts as seven.

—Dave

by Dave on Apr 20, 2008 11:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Winged_vitory_small
Whither Sports
Small
What a difference a year makes. Warning: contains no Blake, Roy, McMillan insults
Trogdor_small
I think it's time to blow this 'Roy' experiment up.
Small
Ego, Selfishness, Superstars, and Perspective
Troll_stone_cropped_small
Who has the best hair in the NBA?

Recent FanPosts

Gorilla_w_boombox_small
POLL: Who would win a Blazer dunk contest?
Ep_109_starvinmarvin_small
11/24 JD - Feelin' Froggy? Then Leap!
Oden_small
Should Brandon Roy start at PG?
Imgp4868_small
Taking Back the Neighborhood...
Oden-hulk_small
Point Guard Dilemma
Small
What do you guys think of Canzano/Quick's coverage of the Blazers these days?
Dscn06250517_1_small
Let's Celebrate GREG ODEN !!!
Gertjonnys1_small
What is wrong with being a homer?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

oden's interview with nba.com
Historic photo of 1st Israeli & 1st Iranian to play in NBA: Omri Casspi & Hamed Haddadi
A modest proposal: Fire Mike Rice and Antonio Harvey!
For Ann, and Travis.

Recent FanShots

Does Roy Read Blazers Edge?
Nates Thoughts After Bulls Defeat
The Most Overrated Team In The NBA - Rob Johnson
Point Guard Dilemma
trade ideas...
Good old days
Chris Hunter, formerly of the D-league as of earlier yesterday afternoon, started the second half of the Warriors win over the Portland Trailblazers and shutdown Greg Oden.
"Monta Ellis destroyed Brandon Roy"

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm