Game 79 Recap: Blazers 86, Kings 103
Wow, that was an amazingly tough game to watch. I stopped taking notes after the second quarter. If you want to get the flavor of this game, go find a dead opossum, stick it down the throat of a skunk, wrap the whole think in the intestine of a yak, and leave it in the back of your fridge for about a month. Yeah, it was that good.
I don't know how much this game is even worth talking about, but let's start by saying we got outscored in the paint 52-36 by a team featuring Mikki Moore, Spencer Hawes, John Salmons, and Shelden Williams up front. Now mind you, I'm not downplaying Hawes and Salmons. I like them both. But they're not exactly terrors of the deep if you know what I mean. Kevin Martin only scored 16 and Beno Udrih 11 and the Kings barely cared. That's just wrong. Even wronger: EVERYBODY for them scored in double figures except for Williams. That's right...everybody who played. We weren't an opponent, we were a merry-go-round. We never covered them inside or out. They ended up shooting 56% from the field and 42% from the three-point line.
Then there was our play...
I have not seen a more passive effort from Brandon Roy this season, even when he was hurt. (Might he still be?) My first-half notes are covered with variations of "Where is Brandon?!?" I know we wanted to run the offense through the big men against the weak Kings front line, but there's no excuse for Roy not even touching the ball, let alone getting a look at the basket. It was like we were kickboxing with our shoes tied together. Brandon didn't even look to shoot until the second half and basically never drove the ball at any point during the game. Something was up.
Lamarcus and Channing had very good games. Lamarcus had 24 points, 15 rebounds, 3 steals, and 3 blocks. Channing added 15 points and 14 rebounds. Jarrett was decent with 10 points and 7 assists. Outlaw hit 7-14 for 18 total points but everything tonight for him was one-on-one. After that it was stink bomb city. Steve Blake went 0-9 with 4 turnovers. James Jones went 0-6 himself. It was just painful.
I'm certainly hoping we'll see a bounce-back game at home against Dallas. If we pull another one of these out of our hats we may lose 200-60.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Roy
Trouper that he is, Roy tried to play facilitator vs the Kings, but the Blazers probably would have been better off without him. Not that Roy's absence would have helped Blake or Jones throw it in the ocean. And where was the defense??
Did I forget to mention...
Then he should sit
by leeroyjenkins on Apr 12, 2008 4:17 AM PDT up reply actions
That was the first
Even though it appeared Roy was playing hurt last night and wasn't looking to shoot at all during the 1st half, he was till valuable as he drew double teams whenever he received the ball and would then pass to an open man.
Once again, excuses are weak
SACRAMENTO DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING LEFT TO PLAY FOR EITHER, FOOLS.
ps. wasnt this the same team...
Heh.
by leeroyjenkins on Apr 12, 2008 4:21 AM PDT up reply actions
pps. pride, a competitive nature..
Just sayin'...
Ok ok I'm spent.
by leeroyjenkins on Apr 12, 2008 4:25 AM PDT up reply actions
Amen
I do not understand these comments
The suggestion that they are "disinterested" is ludicrous.
They have terrible games, they lose focus, their basketball IQ gets lost, they are tired and injured, yes, but dialing it in? I don't think so.
And their last game was the LA game? They should return their salaries for that one?
They've started slowly before
Three reasons we lost
- Brandon Roy had an awful game
- Steve Blake had an awful game
- James Jones had an awful game
And let's narrow it down a little more
I wouldn't narrow it THAT far
Tonight's another night, though. The Mavs are mighty, but the Blazers have surprised us before...
Brandon wasn't going to play
I heard he's been inquiring...
Don't let that high voice fool you: Brandon Roy has a mean streak a mile long, and he reads every post @ Blazersedge.
And
He's the most egotistical person in the world, but only lets it come out on line. It's part of his cover.
He pretends he's posting from a distant country so no one will guess....

by 



















