KP & Nate: Bench the Starters
For the remaining games of the season, I think the Blazers BrainTrust should bench some of their current starters (Blake, Pryz, Aldridge) to both prevent injury and allow Sergio, Frye, Jack etc. to play and improve their games.
I mean, what do Blake, Pryz and Aldrige need for these last few games? Rest. That's the only thing. Why burn them out? Why not let Sergio and Frye play 35+ minutes and try to improve their games.
Wouldn't this motivate the players come summer-time, to continue to improve their games?
I think this is more important than a winning record.
In addition, if we do bench our good guys, it may improve our draft choices.
0 recs |
26
comments
Comments
As a fan who is going to at least one of these
I don't think Roy, Aldridge, Pryz or Blake really want to sit anyways.
Our draft position is very, very unlikely to change. We can't catch the 9th spot and Sactown probably won't catch us.
by tweener on Mar 31, 2008 1:23 PM PDT 0 recs
rest for what?
I'd agree with resting anyone (Roy/Aldridge) who is battling injuries. Pryzbilla has been really working to complete his first 82 game season, why take that way from him? Plus we have no centers to groom anyway.
With Roy out, it would be easy enough to play Jack exclusively at the 2 spot, and bump Sergio up to about 15 minutes a night. Frye
by douglast on Mar 31, 2008 1:31 PM PDT 0 recs
You don't play hurt at this point.
by T Darkstar on Mar 31, 2008 2:23 PM PDT 0 recs
How do 35 point blowouts...
by timbo on Mar 31, 2008 2:27 PM PDT 0 recs
NO
by iDea on Mar 31, 2008 2:43 PM PDT 0 recs
Don't bench the starters
by BenMatlockTheLawyer on Mar 31, 2008 3:02 PM PDT 0 recs
Something similar was suggested the other day
Why sit LMA? The offseason is right around the corner, no reason to play scared like he was a delicate dandelion. Why sit Joel? He has never played a full 82 games, is playing his best ball in years, and is being a dominant defensive and rebounding force. Plus he has that bet with Jay Jenson (I think) that he'll play all 82 games, and we have NO OTHER CENTER on the roster. I don't even wanna watch the blowouts we'll suffer if we sit our starters... okay, I'll watch. But I won't be happy.
Why sit Blake? His solid play and relative veteran stability is needed on our young roster, and since I figure he'll be on our team for years to come even if we find our starting PG, he should play with our core pieces such as LMA. Chemistry doesn't just happen, and every play Blake gets with the other guys (and really, this applies to everyone on the team, but especially for a PG) will help for years to come. Familiarity breeds success, or something to that affect!
If we were an old team that underperformed or if we had younger guys who could maybe be a starter some day not getting playing time, then you go that route of sitting guys. But a winning season is much more important than seeing if McRoberts is a NBA power forward. It means a lot to a franchise at this stage, and means a lot to me as well. Aside from Sergio, there isn't much reason to play the scrubs more if it means we absorb a loss-- and even with Sergio I want his minutes to come in the proper flow of a game, and not force fed.
I want more wins, dammit! Playing the string out as competively as possible is the best thing our guys could do.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Mar 31, 2008 3:41 PM PDT 0 recs
So far I think we all agree
by lee3022 on Mar 31, 2008 4:04 PM PDT 0 recs
Plus
by blazermaniac32 on Mar 31, 2008 4:36 PM PDT 0 recs
Surge Curiosity
Besides, his shot is flat as a Euclidean plane when he's fresh; I wonder if, once he gets a little tired, if he can even better the altitude of the rim with his jumper.
Seriously though... can he play D? I see him gamble for steals a lot, can he pick some up with some minutes? Will he foul out? Will the fans finally get tired of singing Ole Ole Ole?
by Fizbin on Mar 31, 2008 4:48 PM PDT 0 recs
As for me, I'm an Old Testament Surge guy...
t
by timbo on
Apr 1, 2008 8:42 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Winners win
We have 2nd year players that need playing time and we're developing them... not the guys behind them who have been unable to break the roster.
And that's all i have to say.
by ratbastird on Mar 31, 2008 5:18 PM PDT 0 recs
Carpenters carpent.
by QualityPie on
Mar 31, 2008 5:59 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Dictators dictate
We need at least one more win because I predicted 39 before the season.
by jscot on
Apr 1, 2008 1:59 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Revolutionaries revolt.
by timbo on
Apr 1, 2008 8:43 AM PDT
up
0 recs
............... or do they revolve?
by timbo on
Apr 1, 2008 8:44 AM PDT
up
0 recs
turn in their graves, perhaps
by jscot on
Apr 1, 2008 9:37 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Relish these last Eight Games
We'll most likely work on the rest on Our schedule.
My only wish is that BRoy can have a piece of it.

"The Team with Caricature!"
by Lizzy Lowblow on Mar 31, 2008 6:06 PM PDT 0 recs
Maybe we could use some of that relish to
by annthefan on
Mar 31, 2008 7:31 PM PDT
up
0 recs
QP
Whadda ya stink?

"The Team with Caricature!"
by Lizzy Lowblow on
Mar 31, 2008 7:46 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I would like to see
by BigCelPhone on Mar 31, 2008 6:38 PM PDT 0 recs
Workin' on the J Jack fundamentals

"The Team with Caricature!"
by Lizzy Lowblow on Mar 31, 2008 7:49 PM PDT 0 recs
Wait Now
by tominhawaii on Mar 31, 2008 9:36 PM PDT 0 recs
Don't bench the starters
Too bad that will never happen.
I don't love Sergio or want him to start every game, and I see his many faults. However I am so tired of watching Jack's play, just about anything would be better. Normally when sergio does play, his mistakes or turnovers are ones that I can normally live with. But Jack's cause heart attacks, and I don't think the Blazers want to be responsible for that.
by usmcr3049 on Apr 2, 2008 9:50 AM PDT 0 recs














