Playoffs vs Development
When does it become more important for the team to work on player development as opposed to a push for the playoffs?
In my opinion, this season has been a great success to date. I thought the team would have a chance at the playoffs, but I also thought 45 wins would just about do it. But we are getting to the stretch run, and being 6.5 games out of a playoff spot with 17 to go, its looking like the playoffs are more and more of a stretch. I'm curious when you all think the team crosses the threshold and begins to look at the bench players a bit more. Or, is the push for the playoffs the learning and developing experience the players need? When should we expect to see McRoberts, Von Wafer and Sergio more?
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
BOTH
Lucky for us, those guys are the one we need playing to get us into the playoffs. And all those guys are really young and need more games, need more experience. Roy may seem like a veteran, but he's only played 118 games in his professional career. Aldridge has played 123, and has only started 82.
The fact that the Blazers have a legit shot at the playoffs in the brutal west and they have something big to play for every night is HUGE for the development of our young stars. No offense, but I wouldn't sacrifice these extremely valuable last games to get fringe players like Sergio, Von Wafer and McRoberts time. Those are the guys you play to improve your draft position.
when and if we lose
Always play to win
The only thing we may want to do is experiment with some line ups. I would like to see us go big for short periods and use Roy at PG, webster at SG, Outlaw at SF, and LMA and Joel at the bigs. I think finding out if Travis can function at the 3 and Martel can play the 2 is much more important than getting McRoberts game experience.
by lonevoiceofreason on Mar 12, 2008 8:52 AM PDT reply actions
When we turn to development
What should we do differently? Reduce Brandon's minutes, so he doesn't get hurt.
Showcase the guys who might be traded.
While we want to see guys play, Nate and KP have been seeing them in practice. They know pretty well what we have. We don't know, and would like to, but they know. So there's no point in playing guys to learn about them, that's not really part of the picture. Play guys that you want to keep because they are projects for the future and can use the experience, and guys you are prepared to trade.
There's no real benefit in playing Raef, unless you want him at center so Frye can play PF. McRoberts? Well, we'll get nothing for him in a trade, so only play him if you think he's got a decent chance to stick around. Wafer? Forget it. He won't be here next year, so there's not really much point.
Jones? Not if his knee is still sore. Let him rest.
We need to experience the playoffs...
Also, I'd like to spoil somebody's playoff party by giving them some losses in April.
It would be helpful
But we do need to get 41 wins as 500 ball was my prediction pre-season.
Who do you need to look at?
Making the playoffs this season would bring some more experience, and I think it could only help. On the other hand, these guys aren't making the playoffs this season.
Only if we are out of the playoffs mathematically
You are the only one here that has...
Here's something that should make sense
That doesn't mean we need to play Brandon and Lamarcus 44 minutes a night. But they do need to keep starting and playing the bulk of their minutes. The difference, if any, should be 5-8 minutes per game at most. You can't keep shutting your guys down after 60 games without sending the wrong message and missing out on THEIR development. And the development of Roy and Aldridge is far more important than the development of anyone else on the roster.
--Dave

by 


























