Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Race to the Roses & BCS Bowl Predictions

Game 49 Recap: Blazers 82, Pistons 91

Game 49 Recap

Boxscore

I'm not going with the normal post-game format tonight because this wasn't a normal game.  (And as I said at the end of the post-game stint with Gavin tonight, thank goodness this isn't a normal game nowadays!  It used to be.)

It's fairly easy to describe what happened:

  1.  It looked like everybody in that locker room knew that without Brandon we didn't have much of a chance.  I know the fans and media were saying that (because it was true) but I didn't expect the team to play quite so much like it.  With the exception of moments of offensive brilliance from Lamarcus pretty much everything and everybody looked tentative and stunted.  It looked like we lost this game before we ever took the floor.
  2.  Yes, the Pistons are that good.
  3.  Nobody but the person handling the ball moved ANYWHERE in our offensive sets.  No player movement made it easy for Detroit to thwart our passing game.  Without passing our offense stinks.  We cannot generate good shots one-on-one, especially without Roy.  It's just not our game...not even Lamarcus' that much.  If you see one person dribbling and four people frozen at our end of the court we're going to lose.
  4.  There didn't look to be much communication on defense either.  We botched a few pick coverages.  We let people sneak behind us without so much as a peep or a head turn.  When we did help each other the rotation was often too late.  The result was either made shots or our big guys being out of position for rebounds.
  5.  Don't overlook the absence of James Jones either.  He really opens up the floor for us.  Without that deep-shooting threat we lose a lot of operating space.
  6.  On top of everything the Pistons outhustled us every minute that mattered.  That was the icing on the cake.
Other Notes:

--Lamarcus was just about the only guy hitting offensively.  I'm willing to forgive him some of the defensive troubles considering who he was guarding.  The hard part for me is that he had 5 rebounds in the first few minutes of the first quarter and ended up with 6 total for the game.  Only 2 of those were defensive.  As I said we were exposing him a little and putting him out of position, but still...

--We made ZERO three pointers tonight.  (When was the last time that happened?)

--We had ZERO blocked shots tonight.  And it's not like the Pistons weren't driving.

--We allowed Detroit to shoot 49%, 3 points over their season average.

--We also allowed 26 assists on 36 made buckets.  We're normally the ones doing that to the other team.

--We needed Martell, Jarrett, and Travis to step up.  Martell shot 2-10.  Travis shot 2-8 in 18 minutes.  Jarrett was 4-7 for 10 points but had 6 turnovers.

--On top of that Steve Blake shot 3-10 and Sergio was 0-4.  Between them and Taurean our point guards were a combined 5-18 tonight.  We have a hard time winning when that happens when Brandon is playing, let alone when he's gone.

And that's about it.  There's no real lasting damage done unless the team carries the funk into Indiana tomorrow.  The key for tomorrow will be two "P's":  professional (meaning letting this loss go) and passionate.  We'll see if this young team is up to the task.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

0 recs  |  Comment 17 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

But Dave
what about the Rookie play? I thought McRoberts was suprisingly energetic and scrappy definitely liked what I saw and wondered if he might not be worth a look now and then when we need energy.

Taurean also looked really good for a guy playing in garbage time. He looked like he was a calming influence on a chaotic floor. He could have gunned it more and seemed to play within control. Early in the year he shot waaay too much and didn't look to distribute. 50% fg% a couple of assists and one BS carrying call TO with one bonehead TO. Not too bad a showing from the rook.

 If we end up out of Playoff position I really want to see more burn for both of these guys. As it is I'd like to see more Taurean before we trade him so we know what he is worth. I still have a crazy gut feeling he might be one of our bench guards in the long run. Even if I'm wrong about that I don't want to deal him away as a throw in and regret it.

What did you see Dave?

by Idog1976 on Feb 8, 2008 9:21 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I liked the way Taurean played tonight...
tonight might be the first time I have seen one of our point guards pressure from 3/4 court on, and it was all Taurean.  He even forced a turnover at halfcourt because of his pesky D.  A+ young gun...
RUDY > MJ

by myemic23 on Feb 8, 2008 9:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

BTW Myemic
I deleted your other comment.

I mentioned the radio show because I hate it when people repeat things and don't credit the fact that they've said it before...like they were inventing something new every time when they're really just saying it twice.  I do that whether I've said it on the radio or in a diary here that only three people have read.

Life is better when you assume the best about people instead of the worst, and that includes me.

--Dave

by Dave on Feb 8, 2008 10:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

my bad
I thought you would see it as more of a joke, but I apologize if you didnt.  Sorry for the ruffled feathers...

ps  I think you do a bang up job around here and probably dont say that enough, so thanks for the all your harkwork and insight...

RUDY > MJ

by myemic23 on Feb 9, 2008 10:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry
I didn't take it as a joke but as frustration.  My bad.

--Dave

by Dave on Feb 9, 2008 11:20 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I saw guys playing
when Detroit only cared enough to score 10 points in the quarter.

Granted they played well but this is hardly indicative of anything.  Garbage time is called that for a reason.

I'm not trying to put down their play at all.  They did exactly what they were supposed to, as you have mentioned.  But I'm not excited yet.

--Dave

by Dave on Feb 8, 2008 10:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

McRoberts and Green need more time
on the floor.  When the white unit and the black unit are decidedly off their game I think we need to give more time to Josh and Taurean to develop.  They both have shown individual skills that many of the others have not been very proficient at.  Josh, for example, may have hands as good as any big man on our team..and he can pass well.  Taurean shows a lot of speed and defensive energy that sometimes is lacking from our guards.

by BlazerGabe on Feb 9, 2008 1:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm hooked on change
I've had to deal with it, all my life. Now it has become something I look forward to.

The best part of Our last Game, was watchin' the Rooks play. For me at least.

I think you might have enjoyed a little change of pace also.

"Lenny Suckerpunch NEVER bet on me!" - Elizabeth "The Lizzard" Lowblow

by Lizzy Lowblow on Feb 9, 2008 1:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

When Josh and Taurean
start getting more consistent burn, then you'll know that the Blazers' season has gone completely into "development" mode.

Right now, with the Blazers still clinging to a faint playoff hope, they don't want to run the risk of throwing two raw, untested players into the mix. Nate's rotation since the 5-12 start has done an excellent job of masking the many flaws in this Oden-less roster. It's not really clear where Green and McRoberts would fit into those established rotations, or whether they're even battle-tested enough to contribute in any meaningful way in crucial game situations.

As someone who believes that Portland will fall short of a playoff berth this year, I think you will see the two rookies get some meaningful PT this year. The only question is when.  

by knickfan on Feb 9, 2008 3:46 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

where was roy?
did i miss something?  Is he hurt again?  Or is he just getting some R&R since he won't see any next weekend when everyone is getting it?
written by the Blazer Thoughts artist formely known as "Scott R"

by saregister on Feb 8, 2008 9:41 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

n/m
i just saw the pps from the previous post...i'll do my research better next time before i start running my trap.

my condolences Brandon.

written by the Blazer Thoughts artist formely known as "Scott R"

by saregister on Feb 8, 2008 9:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I missed this game
and it looks like I didn't miss much. Oh well.
The good thing about Jack inbounding is that he's already standing out of bounds. - Fizbin

by jamon51 on Feb 8, 2008 11:51 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

New offense?
I'm really feeling like we need a better offensive system, something that requires movement.  I think it would be interesting to start throwing some triangle in there and see what they do with it.

by danielfarrell on Feb 9, 2008 6:37 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Detroit noise
I could hear canned music while the game was in motion and the PA announcer sounded waaaay over the top.

Anybody have first hand experience at the Palace?  If it's truly like it sounded last night I'll take the RG any game.

"This is the pre-season for NEXT YEAR." - timbo, Feb. 8.

by jorga on Feb 9, 2008 7:32 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I was at the game last night
As a Portland transplant to Toledo, Ohio, I finally was able to make it to my first game of the season last night.  I personally didn't notice any canned noise that was annoying or anything, but you're right that the crowd was eerily quiet.  They cheered pretty loudly on a couple of Piston allyoops in the second half, but other than that I could have a conversation with my buddy pretty much all game long.  It was too bad that the game got out of hand so quickly.  I think by the end the crowd even started to feel a little pity for the Blazers.  I know that the Pistons fans sitting beside me were very disappointed not to have gotten a chance to see Brandon Roy play.  As was I.

I don't think it helped that their halftime entertainment was   'jazzercise' -- a group of 100 moms in white tops and black spandex pants that basically just did their workout routine for the crowd.  Let's just say that I hope none of my ticket money went to them.

As far as evaluating Blazers players themselves, it's clear that without Roy the Blazers really are just a 24 win team.  They depend so much on Roy to set up the offense and generate opportunities for other players.  They also depend on him for their confidence against other teams.  I like Aldridge and feel that he will be a solid contributor as he matures, but I'm not sure he has the mental makeup to ever become a game-changer like Roy or Outlaw.  I'm not sure why I feel this way.  It's just a feeling that I've had all season while watching him play.  But I find myself having to constantly remind myself that it is still only his second season.  In a way, Roy's success, being only a second year player, makes everyone else on the team look like a slacker.  

I hate to say it, but personally the only guys I keep for sure on the team at this point are Roy and Oden.  For the right price I could even part with Aldridge.  And everyone else, well... you better start doing more to realize your potential or play with more consistency.  I'm pretty sure that by next season, there will be more than a few roster changes.

Let's hope for a better result tonight in Indiana.  Go Blazers!

by BootStrapper on Feb 9, 2008 9:58 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

At what point do the players and the coaches
Stop identifying the problems, stop talking and discussing the problems, and start correcting the problems??

Yeah JJ, Martell, we know there was little to no effort last night.  We know you got beat on the boards.  We know you can't seem to shoot above 45% as a team.  We know that nobody on the tam except for Joel and Brandon can play defense.  We know, we know, we know.

NOW FIX IT.

Rally tired of "Gee, yeah we got manhandled."  "Gosh, that team has a superstar and that's what superstars do."  "That team is really good, holy cow I wish we were that good."  etc etc.

by leeroyjenkins on Feb 9, 2008 7:49 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Jack's problem wasn't too little effort
IMO, it was the opposite.  JJ came out tense, like he was trying to replace Roy.  He forced things and had a terrible game.  Having said that, Jack was far from the only offender.  I was most appalled by the Blazers' defense.  The Pistons came out cold-shooting, but after awhile they started getting back door layups and dunks when no one rotated to pick up cutters off of screens.  That got the Pistons feeling good about themselves and they started hitting everything from outside.  Then it really got ugly.  Who were the biggest offenders on D?  I'm not sure, but I did notice Martell and Frye looking lost a lot.  Guys would leave their man for no compelling reason, and dunks would result.  

Overall, this was a look at where the team might be without Brandon Roy.  It wasn't a pretty sight.  To the Pistons' credit, they executed well on offense and played solid D from the start.  I think Dave may not have given them enough props for the latter.  He mentioned a complete lack of movement by the Blazers, but I watched them try to run Martell off the series of screens (ala Rip Hamilton) time and time again, and the Piston defenders chased him down so effectively that he never could get open.  I guess it's not surprising that the masters of that play would know exactly how to defend it.

"Ime caught the guy in mid-air with a fist and calmly continued his dispatching of oncoming people." -Gabe Muoneke

by hurryup09 on Feb 9, 2008 10:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Guess who has the highest PER for the Blazers? Hint, it isn't who you think.
Small
New B-Roy is the Old Kobe
The_dude_small
Stats 101: Whats The Deal? Let Me Explain...
Broyhope_small
First Rose Garden Game Redux...
Troll_stone_cropped_small
Nate in the land of the giants

Recent FanPosts

Screen_shot_2009-11-03_at_9
Looking to Consolidate the Blazers Talent? Well Guess Who has the Highest +/-? Also Blazers vs. Grizzlies Game Preview
Dsc_6704
"Per 48 Minutes" stats = Good news for Bayless
Copy_of_dcp_2180_small
09/10 junk
Meaccident_small
Most encouraging signs from the early season
Imported_photos_00004_small
Blazers Vs Timberwolves 10/8/09 Review
Small
How to consolidate?
Small
The Sched Ahead -- 11/09/09 Week Three, Primoris Annus Blazerium Dominatium
Small
Is Bynum the New Oden
Small
Brandon (old or new) is NOT Kobe (old or new) w/Poll
1-5-2009_007_small
NBA League Pass Blazer feeds???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

marty's buzzer beating dunk
Brandon Roy Wallpaper
Chad Ford (Insider): Travis Outlaw "Probably Won't Be Re-Signed"
Manu catches a bat during game. live coverage

ps
check out blair at the begining of video he freaks like a girl
Start Miller

Recent FanShots

Basketball Stats for Beginners...
So Bayless and T.I. are related right??
This chick will bring the toughness that the Blazers need to stop the other teams best players. Sign her KP!!!!
Rudy openly expresses disgruntlement
Charlie Rosen critiques the Blazers
McMillan said the key to having success on the road comes down to one...
NBA Top 10 From Last Night
I hope to see a LOT more of this during the season...nothing better than seeing Oden get block of the night.
Jaynes Weighs in on Blake / Miller / Roy
Viva la 3-Guard! T-Wolves Recap, at Loaded Orygun

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm