Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Game 46 Preview: Knicks vs. Blazers

A (Reluctant) Look at the Knicks

I've got to confess something. I usually find doing the preparation work for previews somewhat exciting, or at least interesting.  I try to watch a few games over the course of the season.  I read around a little.  I look at the stats pretty hard.  It's like putting together a jigsaw puzzle.  But I got absolutely zero enjoyment preparing for the Knicks.  This isn't a puzzle, this is a mess.  You're probably familiar with the Ted Stepien rule governing the NBA draft...the one that says a team cannot go without consecutive first round picks two drafts in a row.  It was instituted because then-Cleveland-owner Ted Stepien traded away his picks in such a grotesquely incompetent manner that he drove the franchise into the ground singlehandedly.  The NBA needs to formulate an Isiah Thomas rule to keep executives from doing whatever the heck he did to form this monstrosity.  

As everybody knows the Knicks have talent.  That's what makes them so frustrating.  Their level of play is near-delinquent.  They don't help each other much on offense and even less so on defense.  They allow a 47.5% opposing field goal percentage.  And they're not playing a running game.  They are dead last in the league in assists and 23rd in overall field goal percentage and three-point percentage.  They seldom force turnovers, they never-ever-EVER block a shot, they shoot very poorly from the free throw line...they're just congenitally incapable of generating any aesthetically pleasing (or effective) opportunities.  What do you see instead?  Power forward one-on-many in the post, center is pouting.  Center one-on-many in the post, power forward is pouting.  Guard dribbles all day, hoists a lame shot, or drives into the congregation of defenders surrounding the aforementioned post men--possible because they pass about as often as a Yugo in a Grand Prix--and now both big men are pouting.  Nobody gets back.  Nobody hustles.  It's about as pretty as that thing your cat leaves on the sofa after "acking" for five minutes.

I usually try to check the overall schedule and scores to determine if a team has a preference for higher scores, lower scores, close games, blowouts, etc.  The only preference the Knicks have is for losing.  They can lose in the 80's, the 100's, anywhere in between, or to either extreme.  They've lost scoring 110 and 118.  They've lost scoring 59.

Every year New York fans get excited about the latest draft pick and every year the story seems to repeat itself.  The kid does well at first but slowly fades into oblivion.  Channing Frye, Renaldo Balkman, now even David Lee a little bit.  And forget about free agents and trade acquisitons.  The best teams make everyone who joins them better.  The Knicks sap you like a vampiric Kobayashi.  They might as well make the unis out of Kryptonite.

What's more, Eddy Curry and Quentin Richardson both left Wednesday's game with "flu-like symptoms".  No report on how they're doing (or what kind of flu).

So what do the Knicks do well?  They can score individually if they get a head of steam and enough touches.  They're good offensive rebounders.  They draw quite a few fouls.  Ummm...  Ummm...  They make other team's offensive schemes look effective?

On the rare nights they do play together New York can still be formidable.  Jamaal Crawford, Eddy Curry, Zach Randolph, David Lee, Nate Robinson, Quentin Richardson...these guys can all ball.  

The Knicks are capable of beating the Blazers tonight.  We're hardly bullet-proof ourselves and their big post men and slashing guards could present problems.  This is not the worst team in the league.  They just have the biggest gap between what they look like on paper and what they look like on hardwood.

What I'd Like to See Tonight

  1.  The Knicks don't block shots and they don't get back.  Push the tempo, drive often, get fouled or convert free throws.  Hoisting jumpers is just asking them to rebound.
  2.  Your defense should focus on whoever has the ball.  Their post guys are a load but as we said they never pass.  Therefore when one of them gets the ball you're 85% sure who will shoot it.  If Lamarcus or Channing or whoever is having trouble, just double.  If they pass out for the open perimeter shot the Knicks will probably clang it anyway.
  3.  If you don't let them score off of offensive rebounds their already-crippled offense will be on full-out life support.
  4.  Get a little nasty.  Fouls rather than dunks are the order of the day.
  5.  I'm hoping that the return of Zach puts a little chip on this team's shoulder.  They've already proven 26 times over that they can win without him but a little desire to prove it to his face should help.  If you display ANY energy you will be far ahead of the Knicks in that department.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

See you guys at the game
To welcome back....

FRED JONES

"I Dare You Not to Like the Blazers" Henry Abbott

by Sabonis4Ever on Feb 1, 2008 1:11 AM PST reply actions  

If Curry is out with the flu....
It solves some of their chemistry problems.  It just means Zach will see the ball even more.  Look for LMA to have his game face on, he'll want to shut down Zach for good.  Channing, too, will view this as an opportunity to show that the trade was a good thing.

The big difference?  Channing and LMA have their entire team wanting to prove the trade was a good thing.  Zach?  He'll want to prove it was a good thing for NY, but his teammates won't particularly care about that aspect of it.

by jscot on Feb 1, 2008 1:25 AM PST reply actions  

Very excited
about this game. But the Cleveland loss had added a sense of urgency. We just cannot lose this game if we expect to make the playoffs. The Knicks are playing better than they were but still, we're at home with the superior team. We must win.

by jayseyfield on Feb 1, 2008 1:34 AM PST reply actions  

Dave, I'm 180 out from you on the rule thing.
Your are probably not serious (at least I hope you are not), but I felt strongly enough about it to comment.

On general principle I do not believe in creating laws or rules whose primary justification is to protect people from their own actions.  

Other than NY Knick fans, why should anyone care if management or ownership runs that team into the ground?  Arguments about New York being a flagship market and it effecting the well being of the league are so much cow manure.  The NBA is actually experiencing a slight increase in popularity this year after being on a downward slope the past few.  

If the league were to come up with the "Isaiah" rule, what do you think would be a result?  I can tell you one - Portland still has Zach Randolph starting at power forward.  The Chinese symbol for chaos is the same as the one for opportunity.  Where there is chaos, opportunity exists for a smart, or adventurous individual.

by timg56 on Feb 1, 2008 7:07 AM PST reply actions  

Would you feel this way
if it was our franchise at risk?

Just askin'

"jksnake99's advice : NEVER give up on a Brandon Roy led team." -- posted at halftime...

by jorga on Feb 1, 2008 7:57 AM PST up reply actions  

We've been there.
Just not to the same degree as NY.  There is a good argument that Whitsett really blew it with some of his decisions to trade or add guys following the 2000 playoff collapse.

Besides, I'm a Redskins and Orioles fan.  Baltimore has put itself in the running for top ten worst run sports organizations all time.  I'm willing to contribute to a Hire a Hitman fund to take out Peter Angelos.  But I still don't believe there should be a rule that prevents owners from meddling with their team or making bone-headed decisions.

There is no guarantee against failure in life.  

by timg56 on Feb 1, 2008 9:00 AM PST up reply actions  

Yah
It was tongue-in-cheek.

However I do think it is something of a disgrace to the entire league when somebody does this with a franchise...any franchise, let alone such a prominent one.  I don't think Isiah is good for anybody except the people he's traded with perhaps.

Portland was a black eye to the league too though, just in a different way.  So there shouldn't be a rule.  But his incompetence should not have gone on this long.

--Dave

by Dave on Feb 1, 2008 9:48 AM PST up reply actions  

I agree with Tim
NY may be a disgrace, but they went into it eyes wide open. They have some pieces--if they wanted to, they could rebuild as the Blazers did (who had less to work with). So it's up to them, not the league, to fix their problems.

To be honest, I think it's good to have a sort of "recycle bin" where you can send all of your malcontents. :)

The good thing about Jack inbounding is that he's already standing out of bounds. - Fizbin

by jamon51 on Feb 1, 2008 12:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Get a little nasty?
Do you think this team can do that?  The only nastiness I've seen was JJones' flagrant the other night and I think that came out of sheer frustration.  Oddly enough if it was mentioned in game stories I missed it.  (Not odd that I missed it, but you know what I mean.)

Joel can be tough, but often it backfires on him.  Sometimes I really miss Magloire.  (Did I really say that??)  I wish Raef could be turned into an intimidator - come in do his dirty work, foul out, thank you very very much.  

But I just don't see our guys getting down and dirty.  Not even mussed up.  

"jksnake99's advice : NEVER give up on a Brandon Roy led team." -- posted at halftime...

by jorga on Feb 1, 2008 8:02 AM PST reply actions  

Rebounds key...
Can the Blazers rebound on this team? That's one big question.

I suspect Zach is going to have a monster game. It seems like that has been the case with other departed Blazers in their first time back.

t

by timbo on Feb 1, 2008 8:17 AM PST reply actions  

Strategy for beating the Knicks
On offense: Give the ball to Sergio all game with the proviso that he score only by driving to the hoop.  He can shout "Ole!" for 48 minutes while zipping past the Knicks' matador defense.

On defense: Start each Knicks possession in a man-to-man that is tight on every Knick except Zach, which will force the other Knick players to toss him the ball.  Then, all five Blazers surround Zach and when he attempts a shot, take the ball from him. Leave the passing lanes open for Zach. Don't worry, he won't use them.

by MiledAnimal on Feb 1, 2008 10:27 AM PST reply actions  

Sergio, really?
Wouldn't we want the ball in the hands of someone who can reliably finish a layup?

He would be the best at shouting "Ole!" though.

by abdelnaby on Feb 1, 2008 12:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Sergio only misses layups
when he's being guarded, which won't happen tonight.

by MiledAnimal on Feb 1, 2008 12:36 PM PST up reply actions  

To be fair to Zach
he does average 2 assists a game, which is not too terrible.
The good thing about Jack inbounding is that he's already standing out of bounds. - Fizbin

by jamon51 on Feb 1, 2008 12:58 PM PST up reply actions  

He won't tonight!
Whenever Zach gets the ball tonight, the only place it is going is toward the hoop.

by MiledAnimal on Feb 1, 2008 3:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Hey, that's kinda cool
The way the last three lines in my post start with Zach. I wrote something once that had four lines starting with the same word.  

by MiledAnimal on Feb 1, 2008 10:29 AM PST reply actions  

Not on my screen
(I'm running at high resolution on a 21" though) :)
The good thing about Jack inbounding is that he's already standing out of bounds. - Fizbin

by jamon51 on Feb 1, 2008 1:00 PM PST up reply actions  

It's adjustable
Just grab the side of the browser window and drag it left or right to get the desired effect. Make the window 10.25 inches wide to see three Zachs.

Yes, I know I have no life, thank you.

by MiledAnimal on Feb 1, 2008 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

"Flu-like symptoms"
The Knick's game in a nutshell.

by webted on Feb 1, 2008 12:47 PM PST reply actions  

that was too funny
I should have known better than to try to be eating a bowl of top ramen while reading that post Dave.  I almost had noodles coming out of my nose!!!  If I were a Knicks fan, or worse, a Player on that excuse for a team, it'd be posts like that which get me fired up. But, since I'm a fan of a great team, I'm sitting here with a knot in my stomach from laughing so hard.
written by the Blazer Thoughts artist formely known as "Scott R"

by saregister on Feb 1, 2008 1:29 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm