I just don't understand
We are 18 months removed from the nadir of the existence of the Portland Trail Blazers. That season, that "team" lost three out of every four games in such a nonchalant, disjointed, and dispirited fashion that it was a shame to call yourself a Blazers fan. Those players simply didn't give two rips -- not for each other, not for each other, and certainly not for us, the fans.
When that squad wasn't getting annihilated on the court, they were embarrassing themselves off of it. Patterson demanded a guaranteed 25 minutes a night or a trade and openly defied McMillan's authority as coach. Telfair "mistakenly" brought a loaded handgun on the team plane. Cars registered to Randolph were drag-racing in a 20-MPH zone. Randolph was investigated for felonious sexual assault. And our three-headed Cerebus of a front office was an incompetent joke.
And the people of Portland were disgusted. Disgusted with the open contempt the players displayed towards the coach and the organization, fed up with turning on KATU at 5:00 and seeing another off-court incident being reported, flat tired of cheering for a team that didn't respect them nor each other. The Blazers played before an indifferent, half-full Garden every night; Kobe and LeBron got louder cheers than any Blazers player; Paul Allen made serious attempts to sell the team. Eighteen months ago we were scouring the details of the Rose Garden's lease and evaluating the likelihood of the NBA approving a relocation request.
And now, eighteen months later, we stand on the brink of a dynasty. We have one of the brightest up-and-coming coaches in the game, a roster brimming from top to bottom with young talent, a general manager with the touch of King Midas, and a rejuvenated owner willing to spend whatever it takes to bring a championship to Portland. I've been in the Garden this year when fans were blowing the roof off for a regular-season game in December. It gives me goosebumps to recall now.
Yet somehow, in a fashion that truly boggles my mind, I've read on this site -- one of the most knowledgeable, passionate basketball sites I've found on the web -- diaries calling for Nate's head on a platter. Posters excoriating Frye, Jack, Sergio, and Webster, demanding their trades or outright releases. Casting aspersions over the entire roster and coaching staff when we lose a game. Saying they're tired of making excuses for this team.
I'm sick and tired of it. Remember where we were 18 months ago and look at where we are now. We ought to be thanking our lucky stars on bended knee every single night -- that this franchise has resurrected itself from its ashes and recaptured the full devotion of every single Blazers fan in a year and a half. There are franchises that have been "rebuilding" for the past decade.
I get up at 3:30 am to watch streaming video of this team live because I don't want to miss a second of it, and I'm not saying it to toot my own horn -- I know I'm not the only one here doing it, or who would do it if necessary. And if a 21-year-old isn't a consistent shooter yet, or a foreign point guard learning a new style and a new language yo-yos up-and-down, or if we lose a game on a last-second layup by the best player in the world...a dash of perspective might be warranted here. Because 18 months ago, the buzz, enthusiasm, and accolades that the Portland Trail Blazers now garner from every corner of the nation would have seemed a fantastical mirage.
0 recs |
56
comments
Comments
I agree
by winnerwinner on Feb 1, 2008 10:14 AM PST 0 recs
I think you're filtering the positives
But I've seen a lot more posts openly grateful for the new team and many comments about the excitement of the coming dynasty.
You've got to expect a bit of knee-jerk reacting over a loss because the expectation set is so different now. Probably not fair; probably not realistic; but it is certainly reailty.
All in all, I think this is a site that shows a great deal more temperance than many other places.
by Fizbin on Feb 1, 2008 10:15 AM PST 0 recs
Lots of stuff
by BlazersOrBust on
Feb 1, 2008 10:42 AM PST
up
0 recs
Okay, how's this for concrete evidence
- Yours, which is essentially a defense of all that is right and good with the Blazers.
- A poll on Z-Bo--implying that things are better now.
- Rudy Gay link--neutral, I think you'd agree.
- Scoreboard watching--neutral post about other games though I suggest that we watch scoreboard (read: standings) now only because the team is better.
- Did Nate really say this? Really a defense about something that may have been taken out of context at TrueHoop... overall, I'd say complimentary of Nate.
- Roy celebration post.
- All star jerseys--more Roy celebration.
- Is their video--more Roy celebration.
- Downside to Roy being good--a satiric post or perhaps someone actually really, really protective of Roy. I say that is really more Roy celebration.
- Roy is an all star--big time Roy celebration with 112 comments right now.
- Another Roy is all star diary.
- My post about being pretty cool with the last loss.
- Expectations--a diary really celebrating what our heightened expectations are.
- Devin Harris--the diary about a trade that was ridiculed because our team is so awesome we can wait.
- Finaly Play--people concenred about the lack of Joel in the final play of the Cleveland game. But even here you have defense from none other than Dave about that decision.
- Roy didn't appear 100%--people comparing Roy to LeBron: the best player in the game!!!
- All star anticipation--more Roy love.
My friend, it seems to me that it is incumbent upon you to come up with evidence to the contrary of the last 17 separate diaries and the main page of this website if you're going to write stuff like this.
by Fizbin on
Feb 1, 2008 10:56 AM PST
up
0 recs
Fizbin... eh?
You're looking at just the past couple of days. The poster is rerrering to the history of this site this year. He's accurate as there have been. they stopped about 8 games into the 13 game winning streak.
They've started up to some extent (GET RID OF JACK!) since we've started losing again.
Some complaints have been valid, others are unduely negative and without appreciation for where we came from. only a few of us actually thought the playoffs were possible and that isn't the goal for this year.
Well... it's Roy's goal, and that's awesome. It wasn't managements goal though. Their goal this year was to teach and figure out what pieces fit so they can make moves over the next two years to put the final pieces in place.
by ratbastird on
Feb 1, 2008 11:38 AM PST
up
0 recs
Get used to it
by Jumbo on
Feb 1, 2008 11:50 AM PST
up
0 recs
Yes, Yes, Yes
by silkybrown on
Feb 1, 2008 11:55 AM PST
up
0 recs
Emasculated?
You see... I don't want the blazers to blow the team apart after a few bad games. I can see the big picture, and I'm in it to win it. If bloggers here had their way, nate would already be fired and we'd NEVER have gone on the run we did. I'm sure other players would be gone too.
This is a team that requires patience while they learn and grow. Nate learned that lesson, but far too many bloggers aren't educated enough or can't see beyond a couple games to learn the same lesson.
You can focus on the short term picture or the success that's down the road. THANK GOD KP is in charge and taking the big picture view. Trader bob is what you get when you can't see beyond your nose.
by ratbastird on
Feb 1, 2008 7:47 PM PST
up
0 recs
Oh additionally?
That doesn't mean we don't tell them "how, quit stepping out of !@#!@#$ bounds!" It means you don't rip them down and ask to fire or trade them every ten seconds and maybe be a LITTLE bit consistent.
by ratbastird on
Feb 1, 2008 7:51 PM PST
up
0 recs
That's what I tell my wife ...
Sure, if people want to find stuff to complain about, they have the right. Those of us who are tired of it also have the right to point out how they sound like spoiled, or un-informed or just plain ridiculous.
by timg56 on
Feb 1, 2008 2:05 PM PST
up
0 recs
There is no such thing...
by Jumbo on
Feb 5, 2008 12:55 AM PST
up
0 recs
It'd just be nice
by ratbastird on
Feb 1, 2008 7:41 PM PST
up
0 recs
I see the same thing.
It's one thing to ask "I wonder why Nate didn't double team James" or How come Joel wasn't in to defend the basket against a Lebron drive?" But the impression I got (which, granted, could be my problem) was one of Nate lost the game or Nate sucks as a coach.
by timg56 on
Feb 1, 2008 1:57 PM PST
up
0 recs
I'm confused
Maybe it's really you who thinks Nate is a bad coach (and this is just the impression I get) and you think he should be fired, but you don't want to admit to yourself. So you project your subconscious feelings on to the BlazersEdge community and then lash out at this phantom collective of NateHaters because you're jealous of the fact that they're expressing feelings in the open which you've kept bottled inside because you're too afraid to face the truth.
by Jumbo on
Feb 5, 2008 1:04 AM PST
up
0 recs
I do understand, just don't agree
I understand people being upset about how we loss games, I mean I have felt down right miserable after some of our losses this season. That is because I care too much. I however would never say something like fire nate or trade this guy or that as the result of one loss. I do however understand the passion, people haven't felt this much passion for a long time and right now people are getting a little carried away sometimes because it's so new.
I also understand people taking about the possibility of trades, you have too that is what makes blogging and fan boards so much fun, you play the GM and speculate.
I personally I appreciate everything this team has done and is. I also tell myself day in and day out, keep it in perspective. Fernandez may or may not be a great or even good nba player, Oden may or may not be a force. We can not predict these things before they happen. I mean who would have believed it if you said that Trout was going to develop into the blazers most clutch fourth quarter guy besides Roy 2 years ago? No one. In fact there were times when I straight disliked the kid and hoped he would be benched or traded, not because of his potential but because of his decision making. But look at him now, same age, great coaching and a couple of confidence boosting shots under his belt and he his an emerging star in the NBA.
People need to keep it all in perspective and appreciate what they have this year. It is something special and throwing words around like dynasty and championship although exciting is a little like calling for these guys heads. We aren't these things until we actual are these things, for now we are a good team with a lot of upside. I for one want to believe but don't think it would be fair to build them up just to tear them down and I am seeing a lot of that happening, here and all over the media. Just enjoy it moment for moment.......
Peace and best luck to Roy in the All-Star game.
by blazhead on Feb 1, 2008 10:27 AM PST 0 recs
Fire Nate!!!!!
by robrun2 on Feb 1, 2008 10:27 AM PST 0 recs
People like me?
by BlazersOrBust on
Feb 1, 2008 10:43 AM PST
up
0 recs
FIRE BlazersOrBust!!!!!!
by amlmart1 on
Feb 1, 2008 11:08 AM PST
up
0 recs
Concepts are perfect, but just perfection=death.
by amlmart1 on
Feb 1, 2008 11:22 AM PST
up
0 recs
fan
Thanks for the post.
by usmcr3049 on Feb 1, 2008 10:42 AM PST 0 recs
I will keep calling it like I see it
If we never criticized would the character of this team ever have changed?
Frye, Jack Sergio, Webster & Nate have all deserved criticism at points of this season.
With that said I will completely agree with your well written diary in that we should be escatic over the change of our fortunes.
by tweener on Feb 1, 2008 10:43 AM PST 0 recs
I agree
This team should be cherished and beloved for what they are, but realize there is a high probability that 65% of this team will not be around in two years. The players deal with it as a business, we don't need to follow suit. We can be irrational, have our abilities to understand the game called into question, learn and teach here. It is a fun site meant to spark conversation, and to an extent, controversy. This is fun just talking about this, and yes, we are very lucky to have this team and these players at this time. Don't confuse the frustration and knee-jerk reactions for the common feeling on this site. Rip City, Rip City to all and to all a good night.
by Rodendridge on
Feb 1, 2008 11:03 AM PST
up
0 recs
Wow...
I agree with you, and you'll feel better to know that I did a poll on what people thought and it really turned out that it was only a minority but vocal few who felt that way about nate.
We do have some fans who are HARSH on the young players, and i hate it. Instead of being objective it's almost personal.
I just tune it out now. It irks me, but I can't do anything about it. I pointed out why Nate was a good coach and how we needed time. We then went on the 13 game winning streak and suddenly people changed their minds.
Others argued they only wanted to fire nate because he wasn't doing what they wanted him to and so he needed to be gone. He fixed that and we won. I argued that this was a short term approach. Nate is learning as well, and some of it will just be time. Voice criticsm but firing nad bashing... man... it's a marathon. We're not like boston!
But... it does no good because they've all decided their going to bash.
So... I think you just need to let it go when you notice you're repeating yourself. They're just a vocal minority.
by ratbastird on Feb 1, 2008 11:25 AM PST 0 recs
I dunno
by jksnake99 on Feb 1, 2008 11:25 AM PST 0 recs
doubting thomas
Yeah, I'm going dynasty.
by ratbastird on
Feb 1, 2008 11:34 AM PST
up
0 recs
This is a blog and a forum...
So even if there is disagreement, let's not miss the point. PEOPLE ARE PASSIONATE ABOUT THE BLAZERS. The Rose Garden is selling out. There is excitement in the air.
And if I want to say that I get sick and tired of a professional athlete who's getting paid 1.5 million dollars to not step on the baseline every game, I am darn well going to say it. Also, if it doesn't make sense to me that your favorite team has a one point lead to protect, and the coach for whatever reason doesn't put your best interior help defender in the game, I'm going to voice my concern.
So which group should we censor? This is a great site the way that it is. Retards and all. If you don't like it, go to the Golden State of Mind Web sight and tell them how good of a player Brandon Roy is.
by silkybrown on Feb 1, 2008 11:51 AM PST 0 recs
You say "yes"
The Beatles?.
by amlmart1 on
Feb 1, 2008 12:01 PM PST
up
0 recs
You say Tomato and I sat Tomato.
by T Darkstar on
Feb 1, 2008 3:26 PM PST
up
0 recs
Er... sat=say
by T Darkstar on
Feb 1, 2008 3:27 PM PST
up
0 recs
I support the blazers
Seriously... he does it a LOT!
@#$@#@#$
It peeves me more than missed free throw rebounds.
Still... overall I'm happy with the team. Jack provides some darn nice things for our team, but man... ACK
freaking line... line meet jack feet... this shall be that LAST that you meet... I'm getting you darn restraining order... DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME?
by ratbastird on
Feb 1, 2008 4:01 PM PST
up
0 recs
I don't think we should censor
P.S. I DID go to GSOM and tell them what a good player the Roybot is. :) Didn't go over incredibly well.
by BlazersOrBust on
Feb 1, 2008 5:01 PM PST
up
0 recs
lol
by silkybrown on
Feb 2, 2008 12:54 AM PST
up
0 recs
I've definitely noticed the same thing
I agree with you B.O.B. and Ratbastird.
By the way, so many of these posts are self-righteously like "YEAH, I am going to crticize my team, that's what any fan SHOULD do."
I totally think that statement is off balance. As a fan, you SUPPORT your team, and then call them out when they need it. 2 years ago, it was neccesary to criticize them, it was terrible all around. But now, I think you give them a ton of leeway until they start to show that they arent just making mistakes but consistently doing the wrong thing, that's when you start to really need to call people out.
Then there's the absolute hatred of Jack... that just blows my mind...
by TimG on Feb 1, 2008 12:46 PM PST 0 recs
well said
Although I do reserve the right to curse every time Jack steps on that @#$%@#$% line.
Maybe I'll just drink and we'll see how long it takes to get drunk :)
by ratbastird on
Feb 1, 2008 4:03 PM PST
up
0 recs
I agree also
BlazersEdge is great because the rational posters are in the overwhelming majority. I have some tolerance for the immediate gratification, instant-expert, quick to criticize fans out there....as long as the loonies aren't running the asylum.
by WarEaglePDX on Feb 1, 2008 1:38 PM PST 0 recs
I feel the same way
In all seriousness, I don't like the weird bipartisan vibe that sometimes comes out of these discussions, i.e. "You're either critical of your team, or you're a blind homer!" or vice versa, "You're either on board with the coming dynasty, or you're a hater!" There's an unwillingness to agree to disagree sometimes which is a little hard to bear. And there is a difference between (to use a recent example, not to single anyone out) questioning or critiquing Nate's decision to sit Joel, and going on some internet tirade about how Nate and KP are torpedoing our chances and selling the season and the fans down the river. You can disagree or be critical without being some rabid watchdog over every little thing--isn't that the reason we don't like Canzano, after all?
Finally, to BlazersOrBust: I also wanted to cheer your usage of "excoriating", "casting aspersions", and "nadir". Well written, sir!
by abdelnaby on Feb 1, 2008 1:44 PM PST 0 recs
This is precisely what I meant
"And there is a difference between...questioning or critiquing Nate's decision to sit Joel, and going on some internet tirade about how Nate and KP are torpedoing our chances and selling the season and the fans down the river." This is exactly what I was striving to convey. Where the line between nuanced criticism and strident criticism is drawn will be different for every single fan -- and I'll be the first to admit that I defend basically every decision that the current brain trust makes, so what seems unduly harsh to me may not appear so to other people.
Someone above, I believe TimG, talked about the "hyper-negativity" that comes up in some of the diaries -- I agree with him that on occasion, that kind of thinking can rear its head here, and for me the bloom's still on the rose of this Blazers team compared to the 05-06 incarnation so I don't like it. But as Jumbo and Fizbin said, being critical is part and parcel of being a fan, which is equally valid. I just wish that the criticism were a little less reactionary than it appears to be to me.
by BlazersOrBust on
Feb 1, 2008 4:57 PM PST
up
0 recs
Oh --
by BlazersOrBust on
Feb 1, 2008 5:02 PM PST
up
0 recs
You spend too much time on the internet.
by little joey on Feb 1, 2008 2:12 PM PST 0 recs
Hate Nate?
by Rodendridge on Feb 1, 2008 4:32 PM PST 0 recs
by "hate on"
The name Alaa makes me think of getting scolded by my Hawaiian auntie. Always "Hah-lah!" this and "Aiyahh!" that. I'm not sure if that makes me less or more fond of it.
by abdelnaby on
Feb 1, 2008 5:06 PM PST
up
0 recs
LOL
But the point I will attempt to make is that people tend to criticize more than they praise. I am speaking of "people" in general, no one in particular. And certainly not everyone - maybe 50.5% of everyone. (And please, no replies saying "not me!")
When you've had a bad experience in a store, don't you talk about it? But a good experience is less often spread. You may return to that store again and again, but you don't plop down into your seat on MAX and say "I just had a great experience at ABC123" to a stranger, but you might say "I just tangled with the world's nastiest salesperson at 123". How often have we asked for the manager to complain about service ... compared to how many times have we asked for the manager to make a compliment?
Maybe we need to gripe to get it out of our system, I don't know. And certainly this site has been generous in praise of each and every Blazer - even most everyone has said they're willing to give D.Miles another chance.
Maybe we need to blame someone for our own too-high expectations. We lose, it's Nate's, Jack's or Sergio's fault. It doesn't matter that the Celtics, the Spurs, and the Mavs also lost. Jack steps out of bounds and people are irate. I believe K*b* had 11 turnovers all by himself the other night. Maybe if we start to EXPECT JJ to step out of bounds it might be more funny than tragic. Maybe Dave needs to add it as a bonus question to a game: in what quarter will Jack first step out of bounds? in what quarter will Jones miss his second 3PA? who will be first to pass to Joel at knee level? who will be first to post a diary complaining about Nate not playing Joel in the 4th quarter? Additional points if it is during the game open thread...
OK, this has evolved into me griping about people griping. Apologies all around. I'm starting to sound like my late mother who (in her 80s) used to complain to me about people around her complaining all the time. I'd just smile to myself and say to her, "yes, that must be very annoying." :-)
by jorga on Feb 1, 2008 5:08 PM PST 0 recs
but...
by ratbastird on
Feb 1, 2008 6:38 PM PST
up
0 recs
Kobe had 11 turnovers
by silkybrown on
Feb 2, 2008 12:59 AM PST
up
0 recs
Held accountable?
But over the last four years, Travis made the same mistakes over and over. It impacted both the amount and length of his contract, I'm sure -- but I'm glad we didn't throw him under the bus because of those mistakes.
Zach made the same off-court mistakes over and over, too. He got shipped out. The time comes to do that.
The only way you can hold them accountable, if you think the team isn't responding quickly enough, is to not go to the games....
by jscot on
Feb 2, 2008 1:15 AM PST
up
0 recs
Case in Point....
Magloire => Pryz
Z-Bo => LMA
Ime => Martel
Roy => Roy
Jack => Blake
Nate and KP are willing to make changes to better this team. One of the ultimate tradeoffs is winning now versus bulding for the future. Things are always as simple as we, as fans want to make them. Another example: Maybe Pryz plays such limited minutes because its been determined that playing heavy minutes makes him so much more susceptable to injury...and we all know that has been a problem for the Thrilla in the past.
by WarEaglePDX on
Feb 2, 2008 1:40 AM PST
up
0 recs
aren't*
by WarEaglePDX on
Feb 2, 2008 1:41 AM PST
up
0 recs
Good idea
by amlmart1 on Feb 1, 2008 5:14 PM PST 0 recs
What's to underdstand?
by fri2219 on Feb 2, 2008 12:18 AM PST 0 recs
I basically agree with most
Overall, we got it pretty sweet here at BE. We got a great team that will get only awesomer as time goes on, and the fan base is loving it. The bloggers here are smart as freshly ironed pair of slacks and you can learn something new everyone about basketball here. But, of course, fans love to bitch and there is always an ample amount of complaining that will occur when something un-good happens.
All we can do is accept that fact, ignore the obviously dumb posts, and do your best to refute the ones that are simply misguided.
We all know Blazers Edge is better than pretty much any fan site revolving around a sporting event. You just can't shut out all negativity and whining, no matter how good things are going. Oh well.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Feb 2, 2008 2:35 AM PST 0 recs
Yup
by tominhawaii on
Feb 2, 2008 1:23 PM PST
up
0 recs
You forgot add
by amlmart1 on
Feb 2, 2008 1:39 PM PST
up
0 recs
Dag-nab-it
by tominhawaii on
Feb 2, 2008 2:22 PM PST
up
0 recs
Mortimer needs to be called "The Hammer"
by WarEaglePDX on
Feb 2, 2008 2:22 PM PST
up
0 recs








