Steve Hill #1 on Hollinger Power Ranking Projections?
Maybe a weird mistake. In case it changes, here is an image link.
http://lukeross.net/hollinger.JPG
about 3 years ago
TheWorkz
16 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I think he is like
1-2 from the field in 2 minutes, which gives him a pretty good PER for 48 minutes. The lesson here is sample size.
"I like blocks," Fernandez said.
Right, and KP is a fool for letting him go
Did Jerome James rule the PER last year?
B-Rex bandwagon begins
lol I noticed this as well when I combatting the evil boomdizzleistheshizle
Hollinger really ought to put a minmum five minute per-game requirement on the rankings.
Every night the team scores 100 points is sort of a mini-Hispanic night.........all the fans get free Chalupas. --Bust a Bucket
He does.
He has a Qualified and All option for players. Hill would fall into the non-qualified category.
he must have stolen the idea from me
although he should have consulted me when picking the time needed to be qualified. 6.09 mpg is pretty random
Every night the team scores 100 points is sort of a mini-Hispanic night.........all the fans get free Chalupas. --Bust a Bucket
500 min
6.09 mpg * 82 games = 500 minutes
JAH
i see
but still—i’d go with a certain number of minutes per game. 5 or 10 or something. maybe even 4.8 minutes just to be 10% of a game. picking an arbitrary 500 min / year seems weird like Stephen Hill’s beard.
Every night the team scores 100 points is sort of a mini-Hispanic night.........all the fans get free Chalupas. --Bust a Bucket
????
PER is not even close to a power ranking. What’s with all the hate for Hollinger?
"Hightide was the only "Yes" vote" - parkinglotj
Joel Freeland=Stud
I love that the picture of Hill
is him in a Blazer’s Jersey. Complete with the Duckworth memorial stripe.
How is it even possilble
to rebound the ball 108% of the time on the offensive glass? Can you explain that to me like I’m a 4 year old.






















