Game 17 Review: Blazers 101, Hornets 86
Ahhh…that was sweet.
General Observations
The Blazers started out this game in perfect form, sharing the ball on offense, staying in front of their men on defense, rebounding well. Spearheaded by Brandon Roy’s poetic drives plus some nifty three-point shooting
The Blazers came out re-energized in the third period. Their starters carried the day and the reserves were sprinkled in as spice rather than subbed wholesale. The driving returned. The passing returned. The Blazers busted out with 27 and re-built the lead.
At this point it was time to cue the Hornets for the typical veteran, playoff-bound team comeback. That was the theory anyway. I haven’t seen a more obviously blown entrance since the Von Trapp family skipped out on the Nazis. Part of it was playing in the fourth-quarter on the second night of a back-to-back. A bigger part of it, though, was the Blazers staying in front of both Chris Paul and David West, refusing to let them get any kind of rhythm. The point guards and power forwards did a marvelous job individually and the entire team switched on screens and bothered
The Blazers employed the press off of made shots tonight with some degree of success, particularly early. They also pushed the tempo during selected possessions. We’re beginning to see the door open on a faster, more aggressive style overall. We saw tonight, though, that bread-and-butter basketball is the foundation of success because you can rely on it even when the running and harassing isn’t working.
Chris Paul scored 16 points in this game with 6 assists. David West scored 10. That would be 14 points and 6 assists under their combined averages. Do you think the Hornets are going to win much when that happens? Me neither.
Individual Observations
Composing epic love poetry to a non-French player is borderline creepy, but I’m close with Brandon Roy tonight. The guy outplayed everybody on the court tonight with 11-16 shooting, 25 points, 10 assists, and 6 rebounds. The Hornets didn’t have anyone who could stop him off of the dribble. The Hornets didn’t have anyone who could stop him after they came over to help the guy who couldn’t stop him off of the dribble. He just broke them down. That created so many opportunities for his teammates it wasn’t even funny (thus the 10 assists and the team’s 54% shooting). The frosting on the cake was when David West collared him hard on a drive and
Lamarcus Aldridge also stayed under control and pounded the Hornets. His 8-13 shooting clip was slightly more modest than
Nicolas Batum only played 20 minutes but he was a catalyst again tonight. Guys like Peja Stojakovic are good matchups for him. Yes, Peja scored 21 but that wasn’t all Nic’s doing. In fact some of that was by design, forcing the ball out of Paul’s and West’s hands. But Peja didn’t bruise Nic, post him, or outrun him. When he’s in his comfort zone Batum has flair. He hustled up and down the court, stole the ball, grabbed rebounds, passed, and hit shots. He ended up 5-8 for 12 points, 3 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 blocks, and a steal. Not bad for 1.66 quarters, eh?
Steve Blake hit the open shot again and ended up 5-9 for 14 points. His role increasingly is being the outlet for shooting, playing off of others instead of handling the ball himself. He seems to be comfortable in it and it’s crucial to the Blazers’ success. As we’ve said many times before the Blazers’ offensive equation is a simple one.
Greg Oden’s stat line probably isn’t going to jump out at you. He had 1 point, 8 rebounds, 3 assists, and a block in 24 minutes. Somebody is going to say, “One point? And he got stripped once too and missed another shot right at the rim!!!” Doesn’t make a difference to me. I was too busy watching him catch and then pass the ball. First off, how many passes to Oden have you seen not actually get to Oden, either because they were intercepted or because he dropped them before controlling them? I’m sure there have been some, but I’m hard pressed to remember them. He presents a big, soft target in there. The Blazers don’t always hit him at the right place or time, but that will come. The point is, you can get this guy the ball. Second, were you watching how he was passing it tonight? He’s pretty good at the outlet pass already and he’s darn skippy moving the ball in the halfcourt. He’s patient enough to pass out and re-post. It almost looked like the Blazers were running the L*kers triangle from the Shaq days out there. That re-post concept took a while for Shaq to learn. Oden already has it. Also you should circle those three assists in the boxscore. He is moving the ball effectively. Offense is quick to learn for most centers but passing takes forever. Greg can pass! That means when his offense does come around he’s going to be doubly dangerous right away. Finally, and most importantly, watch what happens to the defense when Greg catches it. The Hornets were committing at least two and sometimes three guys to prevent Oden from finding the rim. That’s what opened up those passes and those shots. How many times tonight did we see Oden post on the strong side, get the ball, get the defense to commit, then pass out for a whip-whip-whip ball rotation over to the weak corner for an open three? Pure gold. This will only get better. It’s good to see that even now Greg is contributing and changing the game even when he’s not scoring.
Rudy Fernandez had another rough shooting night, going 3-9 for 10 points. He had plenty of energy though, especially in the second half. He contributed 2 rebounds and 2 assists. I think we’re beginning to see the more normalized Rudy now. I don’t think he’ll always struggle with his shot, but I do think his final production this year will end up slightly north of where he’s been the last couple weeks instead of up there in the stratosphere where he started the season. Teams have learned how to guard him, which is basically shutting him off and making him put the ball on the floor. It’s to his credit that he is contributing even when the shot is off. In fact he’s one of the best Blazers at doing so. He’s also one of the more emotional Blazers, which we need.
Stop the presses! Joel Przybilla had more points tonight (7) than rebounds (6). Wait! Stop them again! He got those 7 points off of 1 shot attempt. Hold on! Burn the presses entirely! He got the extra 5 points by going 5-5 from the free throw line. If he had hit a three-pointer too I wouldn’t be typing this game review. I’d be under my desk munching on some Reese’s Pieces and waiting for the apocalypse. Joel also did a fine job on defense, of course.
Channing Frye played 11 minutes, hit a two and a three, and got a rebound. He looks more confident out there the last couple games.
Travis Outlaw played 21 minutes, missed 4 of 5 shots, and looked about as confident as a pimply high school freshman asking Rebecca Haarlow to dinner and a movie. (By the way, serious bemused chuckles directed at Rebecca for just casually mentioning that she, too, was on her homecoming court in response to the Aflac trivia question which informed us that Greg Oden was homecoming king at his high school. Especially since she said something along the lines of “embarrassingly enough…” as if to downplay the achievement even as she was telling us all about it. Major awkward moment. Anyway, back to Travis…) Outlaw did grab 3 rebounds and net an assist to go with his 5 points, but he’s sticking out farther than Carmen Miranda at a Shriner’s convention right now.
Sergio Rodriguez did a great job staying in front of Chris Paul tonight. His defensive confidence seems to be growing each game. Just about anybody with athleticism can play defense, it’s just a matter of whether they will. Sergio is giving us some will. Serious applause. He did pick up 3 fouls but again, look at the defensive assignment. He had 5 points, 2 rebounds, 2 assists, and 2 steals in 18 minutes.
Ike and Jerryd got 1 courtesy post-chalupa minute apiece.
Final Thoughts
The Blazers added another line to their résumé tonight, capturing a quality win against a serious Western Conference opponent. That’s the first time this season. Many more need to follow, of course, but hopefully this will be a confidence booster next time we play the Suns, for instance. Now it’s off for a tough road swing and then some. As has been the case all season, though,
Check out the Hornets’ recap AtTheHive.
The final form for the November
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
2 recs |
50 comments
|
Comments
Who is Carmen Miranda?
I don’t get it.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 12:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'll draw you a picture...
Carmen Miranda:

Shriners:

See?
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 29, 2008 1:12 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Travis wouldn't necessarily give me nightmares like that...
but I get the picture (levels of playful eroticism notwithstanding). Thanks.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 1:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Travis likes to hulu
![]()
"You're really making me feel good about myself, little man," says Oden as he starts dancing after scoring a goal. "You better come harder than that."
by BlueBooYay on Nov 29, 2008 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Best home win of the year
Only thing that rivals it is the win in Orlando. This was a solid win, not a stolen one, against an elite team.
This team is growing up right. It’ll serve us well down the road.
Nate’s a good coach, isn’t he? Like, really good.
This team is also growing up fast, even faster than I anticipated. What an interesting road trip this is going to be.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 29, 2008 12:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
NO is still really good
but I’m not sure if they’re still an elite team. They don’t seem to be walking on water right now like they were last season. That’s good for us as far as the playoff race.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 12:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just won at Denver
If they had beat us, we’d say they’ve turned the corner. But they couldn’t beat us in Portland last year, either.
They’re legit. On any given night, Chris Paul can beat you single-handedly, and the guys around him aren’t chopped liver. They’ll win well in excess of 50 this year, and in the West, that’s very, very good.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 29, 2008 12:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sergio
Really contributed to shutting Paul down.
by TheGreatDane17 on Nov 29, 2008 12:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree... if they beat us tonight, I would have said that they had turned the corner
but they didn’t, they’ve lost some questionable games this season, and won’t compete with LAL/BOS/PHX/Lebron.
I see them as a second tier team this season. We need to rise up and compete with them for seeding in the playoffs.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 1:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I've already said we're winning 55 this year
Losing on the road to a 55 win team doesn’t mean you aren’t elite.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 29, 2008 1:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
damn, Mr. Respect for your PTB
I like your prediction thus far.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 1:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm concerned, actually
It’s going so well, we might hit TiH’s prediction (61).
If there is one thing in this world more intolerable than ME when my prediction comes true, it is probably TiH when his prediction comes true.
Blazer fandom is all well and good, but if Tom’s prediction comes true, I’m concerned about the impact on the moral fibre of Western societies.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 29, 2008 4:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I would have thought
that my last two paragraphs would have made it clear just how tongue-in-cheek that post was intended to be.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 29, 2008 8:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Have you gots some?

"You're really making me feel good about myself, little man," says Oden as he starts dancing after scoring a goal. "You better come harder than that."
by BlueBooYay on Nov 29, 2008 3:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If Nate was a better coach, he'd let Shave dress for games
Ike should be the guy in the suit.
by tominhawaii on Nov 29, 2008 2:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
would Nate Shave prior to games
if he was a better coach?
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 11:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I knew I was going to do that
It was just a matter of when I did it. I had to go back and delete the “e” many times already.
by tominhawaii on Nov 30, 2008 10:06 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Man
Nicholas “the Human Tombstone” Batum is impressive. I want to see the Rockets bellyache over trading him. Great game review, I loved the Haarlow story.
by neutroticblazerfan on Nov 29, 2008 12:56 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
shutting down
Is it just some coincidence that guys like Wade and Paul all of a sudden aren’t torching the Blazers anymore…or if they are, it’s because they’re the only ones being allowed to? The defense doesn’t have an obvious look of dominance, and if you can consistently paste the 3-pointer you can frustrate them, but I no longer see teams licking their chops as they come down court with the ball. they’re taking a lot more crappy shots, and the blazers are doing more on the boards to cut down those immensely hair-pulling 2nd chance points they gave up so many of last year.
It is SO hard not to be completely giddy thus far. How could you not be? They could have a disastrous road trip, win one game—-and still be two games over .500, with the most brutal stretch of the season already out of the way. Giddy, I tells ya.
by torridjoe on Nov 29, 2008 1:19 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
It's like we have a coach
who knows how to set up winning defensive schemes. Almost.
That’s the wild card when we get to the playoffs. Other teams will have time to prepare for us — but Nate will have time to prepare for them. Will his schemes be good enough? Will they be able to adjust after the first game, or will we be able to throw something new at them that works, too?
Nate’s ability to come up with good defensive schemes won us a lot of games last year. And that is the kind of thing that can win you some playoff games, even without experience. It’s going to be a fun year, and a very interesting playoffs experience.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 29, 2008 4:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
On the Von Trapp's escape to America
Reading about the Von Trapp’s escape of the Nazis made me cringe a bit. In many ways, the Von Trapp’s were the embodiment of Nazi ideology— just minus the obvious terror. Little Aryan girls and boys singing sweet songs in alpine clothing under a stern but benign patriarch, one could hardly imagine a better Nazi propaganda picture than this! Oh well, yes, they escaped, or, one might say, their spirit escaped (via the fantasies of movies and TV) to haunt the cultural landscape of post-war America, a country which has its own struggles, to be sure, with totalitarian impulses and fantasies.
by Bandwagon Fan since 1972 on Nov 29, 2008 2:17 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting... and I thought Roy's crossover was obvious terror for the opponents
and get propaganda for the Blazers marketing department.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 2:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good grief!
There was nothing in that movie that endorsed Nazi ideology. Lots of happy families are led by stern but benign fathers. I grew up in one. Lots of little boys and girls like to sing sweet songs. I did, and my kids do.
The story was strongly against totalitarianism. From wikipedia:
Among the key elements of Nazism were anti-parliamentarism, Pan-Germanism, racism, collectivism, eugenics, antisemitism, anti-communism, totalitarianism and opposition to economic liberalism and political liberalism
Anti-parliamentarism — nothing for or against in the story.
Pan-Germanism — the story strongly condemned this.
Racism — nothing for or against in the story. The only way you can make it “racist” is if you object to it being about a white Austrian family.
Collectivism (that’s why they called themselves National
Socialists
, by the way) — somehow, I don’t think the heroes would have been extremely wealthy if they’d been pushing collectivism.
None of these other aspects was either condemned or supported in the story. The story was written to make the Nazis look evil. It became extremely popular precisely because of the strong dislike in Western societies for totalitarianism.
One could say the movie didn’t do a very good job of developing characters, or showing some of the complexities of the Austrian response to Nazism, or find a whole lot of other things to criticize, but to say it is a Nazi propaganda picture is to seriously misunderstand Nazism.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 29, 2008 4:38 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Weird
I have no idea why it put Socialists in a block quote like that. That is really, really weird.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 29, 2008 4:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
oh sure, just an accident, huh?
on the block quote…
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 4:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I put quotes around it
“Socialists”.
That was what they called themselves, and they did hold to collectivism, which is something they share to some extent with socialists.
But I wouldn’t link them with other socialists, because the differences are too drastic. That’s why I put it in quotes, to show that they took the name, but not that I agreed with it.
But why it put it in block quotes, I don’t know. I can’t duplicate it. I wonder if I accidentally hit some kind of magic key stroke, or if there’s something in the software that gets nervous when people start talking about Nazis, or something.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 29, 2008 6:04 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't wait to see the targeted ads
for this thread
On drowning my daughter before she becomes a teenager (to my son)-"You know how when you want to drown someone, you first tie something heavy to the their foot?" My Son: "Yeah?" Me:"You're the something heavy"
by 92wastheyear on Nov 29, 2008 11:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and what does the game 17 review
have to do with the Von Trapp’s escape from the Nazi’s?
oops.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 4:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
nm, I see... I guess Dave opened the door with his reference regarding the Hornets lack of resurgence in the last 3rd/early 4th
my bad.
But since we’re here, Dave, can we get more Anne Frank references? I love those.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 4:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was referring only and solely
to the movie, however. I assumed the reference to a missed stage entrance would have shown that.
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 29, 2008 11:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
and then BandwagonFan tried to make some political statement
fun and games.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 29, 2008 11:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re/ GO's passing
This was largely overlooked during last season’s summer league. Everyone focused on all those fouls GO committed. But he also made some excellent passes—particularly to LMA. You could see right off the bat that Greg Oden had the willingness and aptitude to both pass the ball—not to mention the hands necessary to catch it in the first place. That’s huge; so many other bigs take years to get there—if they ever do at all.
Like you point out, Dave, GO’s ability to pass out of the double team doesn’t necessarily show up in his assist numbers, because it’s the second or third pass that results in the open shot. But GO’s initial pass our of the double is the one that puts the opposing defense in jeopardy.
"We don't back down to nobody." --Joel Przybilla
by hurryup09 on Nov 29, 2008 2:25 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I noticed that too. He also drew quite a few fouls on Chandler. I think that opened up the middle for the Blazers during that run in the third and fourth quarter.
by Aaron79 on Nov 29, 2008 5:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Very satisfying win
No one commented on Aldridge’s +/- coming in at a ridiculous +23 for the game. Even throughout his offensive slump, Lamarcus has been positing good +/- scores, so has been contributing in ways besides scoring. Great job, Lamarcus!
Batum’s stats are beginning to back up the raves he is getting. Right now he is 7th among all SFs in the league in PER at 18.48, ahead of Tayshaun Prince, Josh Howard, Gerald Wallace, Carmelo Anthony, and Paul Pierce.
When their game wasn’t working in the second half, it seemed that the Hornets turned mind games. They tried their own variant of hack-a-shaq game against Pryzbilla, and he responded by hitting all his free throws. Posey tried to get away with his patented wrist-slap fouls and got caught; then he tried wrestling with Pryzbilla, and not only got whistled for that too, but also had Pryz fall on him. The Hornets waived the white flag shortly after Roy inquired of West: “What’s that about?” A year ago the Blazers would have fallen to pieces from this type of thuggery. The boys are gettin’ it, and are going to be really tough in 2 or 3 years!
by jaywalker on Nov 29, 2008 6:55 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
If he had hit a three-pointer too I wouldn’t be typing this game review. I’d be under my desk munching on some Reese’s Pieces and waiting for the apocalypse. Joel also did a fine job on defense, of course.
lol…
these are why I dig you dave, when I can’t see the game, you can give me at least a good 2 min of the …warm and fuzzies, or in the event of a loss, a level headed bring myown rants back down to earth……..feeling….
THANK YOU DAVE.
The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out burns out farms and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.
by faith on Nov 29, 2008 7:16 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Excellent win, everyobody more or less played well
Good times. I was worries this team wasn’t ready to take the step from pretender to contender but I think I’m being proven wrong. I still kinda wonder about Greg’s body language but that’s become a minor point.
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Nov 29, 2008 7:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and I'm less than impressed with the Hornets fan site
Or their users. Sorry, just sayin’
Blazer Fan
by leeroyjenkins on Nov 29, 2008 7:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What, were you expecting them to welcome you with open arms after a comment like that?
by royroty on Nov 29, 2008 8:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm with you
It is pert near trolling.
by tominhawaii on Nov 29, 2008 2:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to add one thing about Greg
I thought he was moving his feet REALLY well on defense. A couple of times he had David West alone on an island and Greg just shuffled those feet back and forth and wouldn’t let West get anywhere. I thought this was a great sign of things to come. This guy shows us more and more skills with every game he plays.
by SalemORguy on Nov 29, 2008 7:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Agree
Every game I see something new (albiet sometimes very slight things and for only spurts) that encourages me to think that in another 30 games he will be alright. Love the passing, love the effort on the offensive boards, he blocks out decently and takes up a lot of space. Anything we get from him offensively is a bonus in my opinion.
"I saw him in the face" Sergio's quote on the latest alley-oop to Rudy.
by blazermaniac32 on Nov 29, 2008 9:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And you can see, when a guard penetrates and Greg is there,
they often just stop, turn left of back right out. It doesn’t show up in Greg’s stat line, but it’s there and it’s real. I’m glad he’s kind of slipped under the radar a bit.
Have a real center on the floor the whole game, instead of having Frye or LA pretending to be a center for half the game is a HUGE difference maker, IMO.
by raoulduke on Nov 29, 2008 10:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hornets coach said when asked
What are you impressions of Roy?
“He’s just a very, very good basketball player. Very smart. Very heady. He can do a little bit of everything on the court. As coaches, when we scout Portland we kind of put him in the same category as Kobe (Bryant), LeBron (James), Dwyane Wade. We treat him the same. He’s that good.”
And Oden, once again, is a rookie, so non-stop fast break basketball is like fast-forwarding a song while he's trying to learn the lyrics.
by RipCity on Nov 29, 2008 2:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Dave
Well executed as usual.
I question one small thing though:
The Blazers added another line to their résumé tonight, capturing a quality win against a serious Western Conference opponent. That’s the first time this season.
Wasn’t Houston a serious Western Conference opponent? Or was that not a quality win because of the score?
when you’ve been in a dry land even a little dew looks inviting —Dave
"When you want to win a game, you have to teach. When you lose a game, you have to learn." - Tom Landry
by lee3022 on Nov 30, 2008 12:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Not what you'd call a quality win
because it was not repeatable. It was a legitimate win for sure. I take nothing away from the Blazers there. However when put into that situation over and over they will come away with at best half of those wins (if you just consider the last-second scoring as a whole) and possibly much less (if you consider Roy’s buzzer-beater as the critical moment). It was an inspiring win, a fantastic win, THE moment for celebration so far this season, but not a quality, “we can do this with regularity” win like the New Orleans game.
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 30, 2008 12:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In other words
you wouldn’t say, “Because we beat Houston this way we can beat Phoenix this way.” You’d be more likely to say, “Holy crap! Did you see?!? We just beat Houston that way!” The New Orleans game, however, begs the question, “If we just did that to them, why not to this other good team?”
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 30, 2008 12:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















