Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods, Tony Romo Grouped Together At Pebble Beach

RUMOR: Outlaw/Sergio for Conley/Warrick/Crittenton

Via Yahoo News

Yeah, you read that right.

"The salaries of Outlaw and Conley would allow for a one-on-one swap, but both teams want to include additional players and contracts to satisfy other needs, including Portland’s Sergio Rodriguez and Memphis’ Hakim Warrick and Javaris Crittenton. It is unlikely that this trade will happen if it’s a straight-up exchange of Outlaw and Conley."

I'm really not sure this is a great idea. I personally think the value of our two players is higher than Conley's value. I'm discounting the other two Memphis throw-ins; that could be a mistake.

On the other hand, it's likely better than trading Brandon for Baron Davis.

So, what does everyone think?

Poll
Outlaw and Sergio to Memphis for Conley, Warrick, Crittenton. What do you think?
I love it!
13 votes
I'd do it, though I think we could do better
48 votes
I wouldn't do it, but I had to think it over.
123 votes
No way, no how, this was a waste of my time to read.
149 votes

333 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 172 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I wouldn't want to get rid of Sergio

Especially not at this point. I’m not sure Conley is a better option, or Warrick/Crittenton

by usdblazerfan on Nov 28, 2008 3:00 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

agreed

Conley has disapponted so far, and has not thus far been demonstrably superior to Sergio. Warrick is a serious downgrade from Outlaw, even given Outlaw’s flaws. Finally, while Crittenton has potential as a big point guard to bolster the roster in future years, we already have that in the pipeline in Petteri Kopponen, assuming he can ever come over to the NBA.

So ixnay on the adetray.

by HoyaGrizCat on Nov 28, 2008 3:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Conley is having a poor showing so far this year...

turrible, as Chuck would say.

I thought I’d heard good stuff about Critterton though.

I just don’t think NOW is the time to trade… I wanna see this team with Marty back first. Then let’s talk.

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Nov 28, 2008 3:01 PM PST reply actions  

would not be surprised at all to see this happen.

sergio gets to start, greg gets conley, warrick’s contract is expiring so pdx gets additional flexibility, the logjam gets cleared up a little bit, memphis could use trout … could definitely happen.

by Ben Golliver on Nov 28, 2008 3:06 PM PST reply actions  

it is tricky to get 3 back and only send out 2. my guess is crittendon would not be included… trade works without him.

by Ben Golliver on Nov 28, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions  

We could also be dumping Shavlik

Seems like this was always his fate anyway.

by Timmay! on Nov 28, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions  

shav has a trade restriction on him for awhile… so if he is really a part of it i guess that might explain why the deal is being held up.

KP has a soft spot for shav. and what do we do with crittendon? he’s got an extra year on his contract too. not sure why we would take him.

by Ben Golliver on Nov 28, 2008 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

ahh got it. my bad.

im no shav fan but that would suck for him.

by Ben Golliver on Nov 28, 2008 3:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Also

we would probly want to wait untill webster to get back before we trade outlaw

by raging WebTed on Nov 28, 2008 3:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Why?

I used to think that as well but really that just means more minutes for Batum and Rudy and how is that a bad thing?

He's Coming! Oden Slayer of Giants

by Idog1976 on Nov 28, 2008 11:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Crittenton would be a bonus

He could become a very efficient player in a few years (great PER this year), only his outside shot is still suspicious. Similar to Jerryd, he can play SG and PG. In Portland, he would be a good insurance if Rudy or Roy go down.

by Norsktroll on Nov 28, 2008 3:31 PM PST up reply actions  

i get hot when blonde chicks discuss PER

by Ben Golliver on Nov 28, 2008 3:40 PM PST up reply actions  

would you rather have crittendon or the cap space? i guess its so minimal as to not really be important but he’d be in von wafer PT territory.

by Ben Golliver on Nov 28, 2008 3:43 PM PST up reply actions  

CAP SPACE!!!

He’d be behind T-Rex on the bench, so he’d just be eating up the cap.

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Crittenton, hands down

a) He can still develop into a very good player (he is only 20!). Before the draft his upside was compared to Steve Francis due to his size, quickness and excellent playmaking ability (ball control, passing). His shot needs work.
b) He could back up both as our third/fourth PG and third/fourth SG
c) He doesn’t cost a ton. $1,381,560 this year, $1,477,920 next year. The third year is a team option at $2,275,997
d) If we find out he doesn’t develop and is stuck behind all other guards, that contract is movable in a later deal

by Norsktroll on Nov 28, 2008 4:04 PM PST up reply actions  

frye or outlaw???

 I think the real decisive point at the end to decide for a trade will be value of travis vs value of frye, and so far which has impressed you the most, which one is the one that brings the most daily.?.. for me it`s pretty much a tie, even though I always feel like travis can do so much more, whereas frye, well you know what you`re getting out of him (so far)….plus I love the fact that we can play outlaw at 3 and 4, while Frye at the 3…. haven`t really seen it, and not sure I even want to, we`re stacked nicely there already…
I say we can wait a bit more and see who rises and who falls, and then right when martell comes back we reassess…

Ati toi, fumier de lapin...

by kidiblaze on Nov 28, 2008 6:15 PM PST up reply actions  

I wouldn't be surprised either

especially because a trade with Outlaw and Conley being the principles has been been rumored and re-rumored since the draft. Trades that consistently show up in media rumor mill reports seem to have a way for happening.

by tingeyga on Nov 28, 2008 8:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Why trade Sergio now!?!

I could understand including him last season, but why throw away all of that chemistry between he and Rudy?

Outlaw for Conely… sure, but keep Sergio around.

RUDY! RUDY! RUDY!

by sagebru5h on Nov 28, 2008 3:11 PM PST reply actions  

actually...

NO. Don’t like any of this. I’d keep Outlaw too.

RUDY! RUDY! RUDY!

by sagebru5h on Nov 28, 2008 3:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Long jam

at 3……and the playing time when Web gets back….Can’t put Batum down the bench…I don’t see us getting players unless there are other deals surrounding this and or draft picks…..Would be good to get a Griz. # 1 pick…so Sergio and Outlaw for Conly and a draft pick

'Liability on defense, is an asset on the bench" a quote from my basketball coach, who believed good defense won games and made the offense a product of it

by 67 on Nov 28, 2008 4:02 PM PST up reply actions  

we'd have 4.5 pg's...

that isn’t a good plan.

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Nov 28, 2008 3:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I declare a

War of attrition on the PG spot!

"Hightide was the only "Yes" vote" - parkinglotj

Joel Freeland=Stud

by hightide on Nov 28, 2008 3:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Interesting...

Not sure how to feel about that one.

I don’t see why you would make the move if you thought Bayless was the future PG. I like Conley (serious potential), but he has been mostly ‘turrible’ this year. Would be an interesting battle for the future PG spot, that’s for sure.

No room for Crittendon, though Warrick might find time, certainly not consistently, though.

Lowry would start over Sergio ( at least in the beginning).

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 3:12 PM PST reply actions  

Talking about Memphis

They need another point if they trade Conley.

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 3:14 PM PST reply actions  

They have 1 too many.

They have Conley, Kyle Lowry, and Crittenton.

"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."

by ignign*kt on Nov 28, 2008 10:17 PM PST up reply actions  

plus

Marko Jaric

"I've hacked into your brain. You're throwing a party and no one's showing up."

by ignign*kt on Nov 28, 2008 10:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Don’t think it’s gonna happen. Not if SRod is involved.

by Aaron79 on Nov 28, 2008 3:15 PM PST reply actions  

That trade takes away a lot of our depth

I don’t like it, and I don’t like the notion that Greg still needs Conley holding his hand in the NBA. Sergio is playing very well right now.

by koyote on Nov 28, 2008 3:18 PM PST reply actions  

OVER THE LINE!!!!

I’m sorry Smokey, but your toe was over the line.

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Nov 28, 2008 3:19 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Mark it zero Smokey...

Or you are entering a world of pain.

by koyote on Nov 28, 2008 3:20 PM PST up reply actions  

This isn't 'Nam.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Nov 28, 2008 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

There are rules

OT, the guy who played Smokey is actually a big singer/songwriter in Texas and recently played a show promoted by a friend of mine. Who knew.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Nov 28, 2008 4:26 PM PST up reply actions  

y'know...

…I read or heard somewhere, years ago, that Lebowski is Przybilla’s favorite movie.

“Say what you will about the tenets of National Socialism, but at least it’s an ethos.” (Walter Sobchek)

by HoyaGrizCat on Nov 28, 2008 5:21 PM PST up reply actions  

if thats true, he gets a +10000

if only he acted more like “the dude” – then again, our team would be pretty terrible if he acted like that….too many White russians and J’s

Rip City Baby...People have no idea what is coming.

Follow my twitter www.twitter.com/PDXBlazersFTW, @PDXBlazersFTW. Lots of random Blazer Posts from links I find around the blogosphere.

by lanepete on Nov 28, 2008 5:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Agreed

At the start of the season I might have made this deal, but Sergio is just playing too well. I’d hate to break him and Rudy up, b/c thought would be a tough pill to swallow.

I feel the same way about Conley, but he does have some sick tools (quicks, hops, handles, etc.)

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 3:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Would anyone do this trade if we...

did a find and replace:

Find “Sergio Rodriguez”
Replace with: “Steve Blake”

Assuming salaries could be worked out.

by Timmay! on Nov 28, 2008 3:20 PM PST reply actions  

I would be

even less inclined to make this trade.

But that does avoid losing the Spanish Connection (although another way to avoid losing the Spanish Connection is by not making this trade….)

I guess an interesting question would be is it more important that Rudy have a connection to his PG or Greg?

Jaws were hitting the floor as Greg repeatedly attempted to tear the rim off the backboard...

by TheOdenator on Nov 28, 2008 3:25 PM PST up reply actions  

I would be less inclined

to do that deal. I see why they want Sergio. If we give them Blake instead, we need even more in return. – Elgin.

All the kids who played the blues would learn my licks with a bottleneck slide. - Richard Palmer-James

by 22baylor on Nov 28, 2008 3:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes

I would trade Blake + Outlaw for Conley + Draft Pick/Crittendon Whoever

by TheGreatDane17 on Nov 28, 2008 6:12 PM PST up reply actions  

i doubt it.

"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcreaft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. [speech at GOP Presidential Convention 1992] Rev. Pat Robertson

by BlazerFan1 on Nov 28, 2008 3:21 PM PST reply actions  

Not sure

A week or two ago, I probably would’ve loved this move.

I guess I would still do it. Though it would almost definitely make the Blazers worse in the short term.

Conley has not been playing well. Sergio and Outlaw have. But there’s an overflow of talent, and I’m sure KP’s not happy about Bayless AND Frye/Nic/whoever sitting in the eleventh and twelfth spots on the bench.

Q: Is Greg favoring his knee?
Frye: He favors dunking on your head, that's what he favors.

by KP Corleone on Nov 28, 2008 3:22 PM PST reply actions  

Warrick and Crittendon

don’t make the Blazers’ roster.

I wouldn’t do this trade. But between Outlaw, Webster, Frye, Diogu, and Batum, there sure seems to be a logjam – it seems that there is floor time only for two, perhaps three of these players. – Elgin.

All the kids who played the blues would learn my licks with a bottleneck slide. - Richard Palmer-James

by 22baylor on Nov 28, 2008 3:25 PM PST reply actions  

One thing I know

Adrian Wojnarowski is the best national NBA writer out there.

Read his stuff, it’s outstanding.

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 3:25 PM PST reply actions  

Really?

I find Wojnarowski’s stories to be unnecessarily dramatic on a whole. Not to mention his blatant bias defending his friend and former partner-in-crime Steve Kerr in the Suns’ mess with D’Antoni at the end of last season…

by Krivicide on Nov 28, 2008 3:31 PM PST up reply actions  

That's cool, everyone's entitled to their own opinion

I’ll check out his Suns articles.

He has been voted AP Sportswriter of the Year twice, so I guess I’m not the only one who likes his work.

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 3:36 PM PST up reply actions  

On the other hand...

I don’t remember a trade rumor that he reports ever not going through. Not that it hasn’t happened… but it seems like the dude has a high success rate with these things.

by Krivicide on Nov 28, 2008 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

This is what I was referring to

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-dantonijoinsknicks051108&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-dantonikerr050608&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

There are a couple others around the time of the Shaq trade as well.

by Krivicide on Nov 28, 2008 3:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Not Working, I'll dig it up don't worry

Yahoo! Sports – News Article Expired/Not Available
The news article you requested has either expired or is not available.

You may be able to find what you want through our news archive.

If you still have problems, check out Help.

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 3:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Oops

Sorry, you’ll have to cut and paste.. the link got cut in half for some reason.

by Krivicide on Nov 28, 2008 3:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Not going to happen...

Key sentence: "[Portland GM] Kevin Pritchard needs to pull the trigger for this to happen," one source familiar with the negotiations said.

The reason this story leaked is that KP didn’t pull the trigger. The Blazers are rolling right now and he doesn’t want to shake things up right at this moment. A trade like this may happen a month or two from now, but not at this moment.

I’m guessing Bill Duffy is the “source familiar with the negotiations”…

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 28, 2008 3:29 PM PST reply actions  

I actually wondered if KP had it leaked

So someone would make him a better offer than this.

by Timmay! on Nov 28, 2008 3:30 PM PST up reply actions  

hm.

Good answer. – Elgin

All the kids who played the blues would learn my licks with a bottleneck slide. - Richard Palmer-James

by 22baylor on Nov 28, 2008 3:31 PM PST up reply actions  

exactly.

people dont realize how much this happens. I think we could get a lot more for trout. his 3pt% would help most teams instantly, and his D is better this year too.

by dario argento on Nov 28, 2008 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

It was me...

I leaked it.

I was the 4th gunman on the grassy knoll, too.

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Nov 28, 2008 3:34 PM PST up reply actions  

4th?!!! It a well know fact..

…that there were only 3 gunman on the grassy knoll….and one of them had a sqirt gun. Liar!

On drowning my daughter before she becomes a teenager (to my son)-"You know how when you want to drown someone, you first tie something heavy to the their foot?" My Son: "Yeah?" Me:"You're the something heavy"

by 92wastheyear on Nov 28, 2008 4:37 PM PST up reply actions  

you beat me to it

yeah that is the money quote in this piece and I would imagine that that the source is close to the Griz side and not our side. I would imagine that anyone on our side would see that Travis is very valuable to us and that Sergio is starting to come into his own as well.

Mem would LOVE to move Conley as it is looking more and more that Lowry is going to be their preferred pg? So far Sergio is hitting a better 3pt % than Conley and has more assists than him while playing 10 fewer minutes.

Just briefly going into the fact that 1) Travis is one of the best 3pt shooters on the team 2) is becoming a good defender, and 3) has greatly reduces his amount of crazy jumpshots and is actually driving to the bucket more as well as passing, I see him on par with Rudy in so far of importance.

"Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. They are working the rest of the league like a speed bag." - Bill Simmons 6/26/08

by SpyderRyder on Nov 28, 2008 3:48 PM PST up reply actions  

oops

Now you’ve gone too far

I see him on par with Rudy in so far of importance.

'Liability on defense, is an asset on the bench" a quote from my basketball coach, who believed good defense won games and made the offense a product of it

by 67 on Nov 28, 2008 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

well, if Memphis really wants to move Conley,

maybe we can get him for less than what is pictured here.

The two players on that roster that I would want are Rudy Gay and OJ Mayo – and I don’t see Memphis giving up either one of those guys unless we send them A LOT.

So who all would we give up for Conley, Gay, and Mayo?

They need a big guy (Frye?). They’d need someone to replace Gay (Outlaw or Webster?). They’d want a sub point guard.

Naaaah – Elgin

All the kids who played the blues would learn my licks with a bottleneck slide. - Richard Palmer-James

by 22baylor on Nov 28, 2008 4:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I like it

I think conoly would be great to have around, and with webster returning from injury the need for travis drops even more

"Great Oden's raven!" - Ron Burgandy

by danevan on Nov 28, 2008 3:50 PM PST reply actions  

Oops

Sorry, you’ll have to copy and paste… the link got cut in half for some reason.

by Krivicide on Nov 28, 2008 3:53 PM PST reply actions  

Seriously, if this deal would go down it's about as good as it gets (no team gives up their full-grown star PG for us)
  • He is best (or at least very good) friends with Greg. That has benefitted him in the draft, but the respect goes both ways
  • At 21 his age would be nothing but perfect to grow with our core group. No other available PG is in that group (Hinrich, Felton, …)
  • He is no prodigy a la Rose, but he was a very high draft pick for a reason
  • Conley > Sergio any day already, and he is younger and could still develop into a good starter
  • He is crazy quick a la TJ Ford
  • He is a bit small at 6-1, but has very good athleticism and vert → His father is a triple-jump Olympic champion, it runs in the family
  • His outside shot is not good, but adequate enough that you can’t leave him open
  • Good defensive skills, though Lowry is definitely better
  • Very good at running our bred and butter half court sets yet can also break away on quicker plays

Others:

  • As stated above, getting Crittenton would be a bonus. A big guard who can play both SG and PG similar to Bayless. He still needs to develop (no surprise at 20), but he could become a solid role/rotation player. Low risk proposition
  • Hakim Warrick is an expiring deal. Similar to Travis, he is a bit stuck between SF and PF. No doubt Travis is better and Warrick can’t defend, but at this time he is not worse than Diogu or Shavlik for the 4 position. Another low risk.
  • Martell and Batum can man the SF position and split the time going forward if Travis gets moved

by Norsktroll on Nov 28, 2008 3:57 PM PST reply actions  

I prefer Conley to Felton

Wait until Hinrich’s wrist heals, I bet we can get him for Raef and Sergio. Though I’m not that sold on Captain Kirk.

You’re definitely right about the good PG’s (not available). Pretty much the best we can do, even with all our talent and youth, is Hinrich or Conley.

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 4:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep. Teams who get a good PG don't let them go.

[insert comment about PG’s we missed out on here]

by Timmay! on Nov 28, 2008 4:05 PM PST up reply actions  

if conley is the best we can do,

is he really going to make the difference in this team becoming a contender? I don’t think so.

by hotstuffdb22 on Nov 28, 2008 4:05 PM PST up reply actions  

No...

Bayless has more of a chance of doing that (3 or 4 years from now).

Either way this doesn’t make an impact this year or next.

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 28, 2008 4:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Time lines and patience

I’m not entirely too convinced that conley will be better than sergio…but in the event that he does, he will need time to develop…and fans were already impatient with Sergio up to this point…why would we want to take a step back for a few years with Conley? If we wanted to take a step back and develop a youngin then we would have with Bayless right? Even if Conley > Sergio…I dont want to put in the time, plays, and possibly the cost of a few wins to find out.

Honor Terry Porter

by Philthyanimal on Nov 28, 2008 10:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Conley vs Sergio?

I’ve watched Conley very little so this is a serious question. What does Conley give us that Sergio doesn’t? Neither can shoot the 3-pt shot and the stats suggest Sergio is a lot better creating assists per minute. Why would we give up Outlaw just to switch back up PGs?

Conley 25.9 mpg, 38.3% FG (41.9% career), 20.0% 3-pt (30.6% career), 2.8 Asst/TO, 1.5 asst/10 minutes
Sergio 14.9 mpg, 33.3% FG (38.4% career), 29.6% 3-pt (28.9% career), 3.1 Asst/TO, 2.9 Asst/10 minutes

"But we need a center", Inman said. "So play him at center!" Knight yelled back. - Bobby Knight on Michael Jordan prior to the Blazers' 1984 draft pick of Sam Bowie.

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Nov 28, 2008 4:04 PM PST reply actions  

I agree with this...

I think the Blazers would be taking way too much risk, and then start advertising the “rebuilding” slogan all over again

by hotstuffdb22 on Nov 28, 2008 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Far as I can tell...

1. Conley is closer to Oden and may create a good working relationship
2. Conley has not shown signs of discontent while playing small minutes.

I’m not sure which parts are sarcasm and which are not.

by Timmay! on Nov 28, 2008 4:06 PM PST up reply actions  

+1

Covers the friendship theory quite well

'Liability on defense, is an asset on the bench" a quote from my basketball coach, who believed good defense won games and made the offense a product of it

by 67 on Nov 28, 2008 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

How's Conley going to like playing 15 minutes a game?

"But we need a center", Inman said. "So play him at center!" Knight yelled back. - Bobby Knight on Michael Jordan prior to the Blazers' 1984 draft pick of Sam Bowie.

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Nov 28, 2008 4:08 PM PST up reply actions  

McBob was close to Oden

and that didn’t keep him from getting microfracture…

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 28, 2008 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

why?

there’s nothing to base this on other than imagination

by hotstuffdb22 on Nov 28, 2008 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

All the tools are there

Physical Talent – check
Handles – check
True PG – NO (but that’s okay, we’d be fine with him)
Willing Defender – check
Shooting – check

That’s off the top of my head.

Do you think Conley’s better? He shoots worse than Sergio.

And for the record, I’ve loved Conley’s game from jump.

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Bayless should be more dangerous as a scorer, and be the better defender (soon). Conley is solid at running a team. Combine that with Blake (at least for a while, don’t think he would be quickly moved), and we have one of the best PG rotations in the NBA even without a superstar at the point.

by Norsktroll on Nov 28, 2008 4:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Okay...

Jump also had a nice spin on Sebastion Telfair… which gets into some of my discontent that Portland has had a long future of average/sub-par point guards. Good NBA PGs are tough to predict, and Portland hasn’t done a good job.

Bayless might be different, I agree. He had a nice Summer League showing. But he’s unproven. I could see a rotation of Bayless, Blake, Conley, but to give up Outlaw for this? I don’t think we get much better. I’d rather keep Bayless.

by hotstuffdb22 on Nov 28, 2008 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Conley vs. Bayless

Physical Talent – EVEN
Size – Bayless
Shooting – Bayless
Passing/Creating – Conley
Man D – Bayless by a hair (size)
Off Ball D- Jury’s still out (but Conley plays the passing lanes well)
Intangibles-?? (Conley, b/c of Oden??)

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Might as well take this for what it appears to be

KP lined up a trade, but doesn’t want to pull the trigger (probably because the trade looks like a sideways move). Its a reasonable look at what the value of Outlaw and Sergio have around the league, and a possible hint at what KP wants to do.

"Hightide was the only "Yes" vote" - parkinglotj

Joel Freeland=Stud

by hightide on Nov 28, 2008 4:18 PM PST reply actions  

He is best (or at least very good) friends with Greg. That has benefitted him in the draft, but the respect goes both ways

True but like McBob if he is not good he is not on the team

He is no prodigy a la Rose, but he was a very high draft pick for a reason

Just like the other players that got into the championship game right? Like Noah and Brewer, their national championship showcase bumped up their stock and got them a 5-7 pick bump up the draft

Conley > Sergio any day already, and he is younger and could still develop into a good starter

Sergio is only a little over a year older and is a better passer and shooter

He is a bit small at 6-1, but has very good athleticism and vert → His father is a triple-jump Olympic champion, it runs in the family

We already have inexperienced athleticism at the pg position in Bayless in addition to an extra 2 inches and 20lbs of muscle with no loss of explosiveness

His outside shot is not good, but adequate enough that you can’t leave him open

he averaged 33% last year and is hitting 20% this year so I would let him sit out there and shoot.

As stated above, getting Crittenton would be a bonus. A big guard who can play both SG and PG similar to Bayless. He still needs to develop (no surprise at 20), but he could become a solid role/rotation player. Low risk proposition

Like i said we already have Bayless is we want a PG/SG

Martell and Batum can man the SF position and split the time going forward if Travis gets moved

I am at a loss at why everyone is thinking that TO will be the one who gets moved, if anyone gets moved it will be Webster and Frye as much as i hate to say. Why? as it stands now, Travis is our best 3pt shooter and has just begun to learn how to shoot. He did not have that in his arsenal a few years back and now is hitting 50%+ something the Webster has never been able to do, so if we need outside shooting we can rely on Trout to provide that. This is in addition to all of Trouts offensive game, clutch 4th Q play and athleticism.

However if we need a D presence on the perimeter, we should look to Batum who is the perfect glue guy. Webster has yet to show that he can bring D like Batum has shown in his rookie year. On top of that Batum is a 40% 3pt shooter to boot.

So either end O or D webster is stuck in the middle and either Trout or Batum provide a better alternative, Batum has shown that he can handle a tough D assignment and hit enough 3pters to warrant a Der on him at all times, while Trout has shown that een though he may be behind Batman D’ly, his O game more than makes up for it and is a perfect fit as an offensive spark off the bench alongside Rudy and Sergio.

If anyone is to be moved I would imagine a move with Bayless, Blake, Frye and/or RLEC would be the most beneficial to team chemistry and talent. Move them for a possibly good starting PG.

"Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. They are working the rest of the league like a speed bag." - Bill Simmons 6/26/08

by SpyderRyder on Nov 28, 2008 4:19 PM PST reply actions   3 recs

well stated

RLEC, Frye and Sergio are the ones on the table… maybe Outlaw too if you’re talking about All-Star players… Portland isn’t just going to give up Outlaw as easily as this yahoo report makes it sound

by hotstuffdb22 on Nov 28, 2008 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

You had me until your rant on Martell v. Travis

I’ll still give you a rec for the points above that, but I don’t think “If anyone gets moved it will be Webster or Frye” … If anyone gets moved it will be Outlaw/Sergio/Frye. Webster has been shooting the three well for longer than Travis, has been trying hard on defense for longer than Travis, and doesn’t make as many crazy shots and mistakes.

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 28, 2008 4:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Outlaw/Frye/Webster

Webster plays a 2-ish 3, Outlaw plays 3 and 4, Frye plays a 3-ish 4 but can play 5 if needed.

Hm.

Among these three, since we have Rudy and Roy at 2 already, I’d let Webster go first. – Elgin.

All the kids who played the blues would learn my licks with a bottleneck slide. - Richard Palmer-James

by 22baylor on Nov 28, 2008 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

and I wouldn't want to do that

until I see him get into game shape and see what he looks like with this team. – Elgin.

All the kids who played the blues would learn my licks with a bottleneck slide. - Richard Palmer-James

by 22baylor on Nov 28, 2008 4:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Sorry, I disagree... Webster is a pure 3 as far as the Blazers go

Outlaw and Frye overlap at 3/4… I think Frye should be the one to go, but he also has the least trade value.

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 28, 2008 4:45 PM PST up reply actions  

the only way i wold see Travis moved is

if there was a good deal out there. I will give you that Trout has the best trade VALUE of those pieces and if we could somehow land a Harris,Parker top tier PG it would take travis, but more likely it would be a smaller deal involving Webster, Frye, Raef, or Blake for a pg.

as for your travis vs Martell points let me point out these things I think we can agree on:

Fact: Overall Travis is the better O player than Martell

Fact: Batum is a better D player than Martell

It is Martell who is left out in the cold here. If Nate wants to go O, out in TO and he will be able to outscore the opponent
 
If Nate wants to go D and shut down the opponent put Nic in there.

On top of that both Nic and trout are shooting better 3pt % than Webster does and i dont buy that Webster has been shooting a better longer when Travis shot better than Webster last year % wise, and this year is on pace to attempt only a quarter less 3pters than Martell did last year. Also Webster trying harder on d than travis is kinda pointless because we do not really rely on Travis for D, we can rely on Batum for D.

I dont mean to be down on Matell but looking at our roster he is the one that does not fit as he would be a 2-3 not a 3-4. Being a 2-3 he will be competing against Roy, Rudy, Batum and Travis all players that are better or equal, while Travis will swing 3-4 and had to deal with LMA, Batum, Webster and Frye where he is arguable in the top 2 or 3 between 3-4 s

Like I said the only way Trout is moved is due to the fact that he has the most trade value, but IMO I think we can roll with the team the way it is and do just fine.

"Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. They are working the rest of the league like a speed bag." - Bill Simmons 6/26/08

by SpyderRyder on Nov 28, 2008 4:41 PM PST up reply actions  

IMO

You can’t put Batum further down the bench…and that could be the main concern to KP….a trade has to happen for this reason…we are fine otherwise, but Batum needs to play…..

'Liability on defense, is an asset on the bench" a quote from my basketball coach, who believed good defense won games and made the offense a product of it

by 67 on Nov 28, 2008 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm just saying that Martell will not be traded this season and Travis may be traded

Travis has more trade value? Who’s a better fit for our team? Martell being a Seattle guy with more off season work ethic? Martell being two/three years younger?

Probably some combination of things.

It’s ok that you’re at a loss as to why everyone else thinks Outlaw is more likely to be moved… and you have a valid argument as to why that should not be the case… but the stark reality is that Travis is the most likely to be moved. KP sees Martell as more of your long-term role playing franchise SF than Travis.

Travis will either make you jump for joy, or make you punch yourself in the face. KP wants someone that will just have a steady all around game. And Martell is still quite young with a lot of potential. Remember how Travis looked after his third year in the league?

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 28, 2008 4:57 PM PST up reply actions  

I was not arguing that Conley is better than Bayless, just briefly point out some of his qualities

I have not followed him more closely over the years than other players not on this team, so I could be wrong.
I think he will be a better fit than Sergio for this team and ultimately become the better player (apart from being not Spanish to be friends with Rudy). The team has three SFs who all appear to be solid, and now they are thinking who they might move to either upgrade the SF or the PG position. Maybe they have decided that PG is the way to go now (hint: There are more good forwards than good PGs in next years’ free-agency). In the draft, often potential rules. In most trades, existing skills rule. Travis has more trade value than Martell on the market, which maybe paradoxically makes him more likely to be traded in my eyes.

by Norsktroll on Nov 28, 2008 4:27 PM PST up reply actions  

why are people so big on the friendship connection in this thread?

Doesn’t everyone drop their high school friends once they hit 21?

Oden will mature and make new friends just fine once he hits 21?

by hotstuffdb22 on Nov 28, 2008 4:24 PM PST reply actions  

Not against this trade...

I just haven’t seen Conley much. In the off-season and the beginning of this year I would have pulled the trigger. It would be tough to give up Outlaw unless Conley is sure to be the heir to Blake in the next year or two. He is the only other guy right now, other than Roy, who can come in and take over a game on the offensive end. He doesn’t do it every night but he can single handedly win a game or keep you in it until others get their heads back into the game. As much as everybody is willing to part with him, that is tough to replace.

PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04

by tssbro on Nov 28, 2008 4:25 PM PST reply actions  

i dont do it

like stated earler in does take away from our great depth but i think if KP could get just conley for outlaw and maybe a 2nd rounder that would beest but then that really clogs up the PG position. uhhhh….

what do you guys say

by BLAZERS#52 on Nov 28, 2008 4:26 PM PST reply actions  

On 11/4/2008, I made the following comments regarding Mike Conley, Jr.

"I’ve got mixed feelings regarding Conley, Jr. Thus far into his career, Conley, Jr. has yet to develop sufficient efficiency on his mid-range jump shot or from beyond the arc; additionally, he doesn’t drive to the rack often enough and constantly plays matador defense along the perimeter.

Conley, Jr. isn’t too proficient of a playmaker, either. As it was, he averaged just 7.7 assists per 48 minutes and, according to 82games.com, had a measly passing rating of 9.2 last season — which caused the god-awful Jeff McInnis to be his closest comparison — thus, I’m not sold on him as a competent floor general."

http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/11/3/653380/dwight-jaynes-outlaw-for-c#9811224

At this moment in time, Conley, Jr. hasn’t yet done anything to change my opinion of him.

by AK1984 on Nov 28, 2008 4:27 PM PST reply actions  

I dont see this trade happening.

We lose our second best bench player, a lateral move at PG, and more young players. We get younger, again. This trade rumor smells like smoke and mirrors. Like Timmay stated above, I think it is likely KP leaked it to let other GM’s know Outlaw is on the table for a PG.

by dario argento on Nov 28, 2008 4:27 PM PST reply actions  

Do we seriously have no chance of getting G-Force?

"All our holes," says shooting guard Brandon Roy, a surprise All-Star last year in his second season, "are holes that Greg is going to plug."

by bowdown on Nov 28, 2008 4:29 PM PST reply actions  

I would like him. But Charlotte is looking for a center more than for a new place for Wallace

That being said, a deal for Conley would not exclude another deal at the deadline built around RLEC, though SFs could also be found in next year’s free-agency class. KP has many options. His next move could make a lot of things clearer.

by Norsktroll on Nov 28, 2008 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

man

i like what another BEdger said we are rolling why mess it up with a trade like this where you are taking a huge risk. lets wait till webster gets back for ten games and then see if we can make any moves

by BLAZERS#52 on Nov 28, 2008 4:33 PM PST reply actions  

I agree, but we must do something in the next (calendar) year.

Too much young talent on cheap contracts.

The Bulls were just like this a few years ago and Paxson couldn’t pull the Gasol or Garnett trades. Back in the lottety they went.

KP won’t make that mistake.

by kobisportsguy on Nov 28, 2008 4:36 PM PST up reply actions  

It accomplishes a couple of important things:

Travis is rewarded for loyal service by a trade to his backyard (the Blazer’s integrity as a loyal partner is important). Memphis gets good depth off the bench and athleticism to match Gay’s energy. We get to keep Martell (arguably the steadier player) while creating valuable minutes for Rudy and Nic.

Sergio gets out of Portland quick. He’s gotta get out before it blows up in our face. He brings some companionship to Marc Gasol and he’s no great loss to a deep Blazer’s team. He gets lots of minutes as the backup and occassional starter in Memphis which is his big dream..

We get Mike Conley which helps on several counts: He will be an upgrade to Sergio and he will age well with Nate and Steve Blake to show him the way. He will, we are guessing, also be a helpful influence on Greg.

Downside – Very little I can see since everyone seems to get what they want. Your thoughts?

by oregonslee on Nov 28, 2008 4:36 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

the fillers from memphis warrick and crittenton were wiil they fit on this team ?

by BLAZERS#52 on Nov 28, 2008 4:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Breaking the continuity that is just starting to gel

Certainly enters into it,I doubt we will see a move soon but yeah Travis and Sergio would get a lot more mins in Mem and make them a better team. The pickens will be better later,no need to be in a rush to make a deal

by southern oregon on Nov 28, 2008 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

OK.

Nate doesn’t have a good record with point guards. It’s always been one of the weakest positions on the teams he’s coached.

Banking on Conely becoming great because of Nate doesn’t hold a lot of weight.

I want to put points on your face.-Rudy Fernandez

by Winchester on Nov 28, 2008 5:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Sergio > Conley

Sorry Timbo

That is really hideous
--jscot

by prezofdeath on Nov 28, 2008 4:39 PM PST reply actions   4 recs

yup

- elgin

All the kids who played the blues would learn my licks with a bottleneck slide. - Richard Palmer-James

by 22baylor on Nov 28, 2008 4:44 PM PST up reply actions  

+1

better passer, better control of the team and ……..I thought I would never say this…..better……shooter

"Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. They are working the rest of the league like a speed bag." - Bill Simmons 6/26/08

by SpyderRyder on Nov 28, 2008 4:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Also Sergio's bigger and looking good on defense as of late

Conley is undersized and can’t shoot. I don’t see how he’s an upgrade on Sergio.

Conley has been given more playing time the last two season than Sergio and still hasn’t looked better lately.

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 28, 2008 5:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Add 1

And he’s not just better now. Sergio has as much untapped potential as Conley, in my opinion. I’m sure some will disagree with me, but Sergio has made me a believer in him again.

Poor grammar is poor communication.
Poor communication causes misunderstanding.
Misunderstanding causes fighting.
Fighting causes war.
War causes death.
Therefore, your poor grammar may just kill us all.

(One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season)

by T Darkstar on Nov 28, 2008 5:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I have Dallas covered

Just looked in Dave’s mail. It really looks like there is no one, since they are also not represented on SBN NBA so far.

by Norsktroll on Nov 28, 2008 5:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Found something

http://3shadesofblue.com/20081128104/memphis-grizzlies/november-2008/trade-rumor-conley-to-portland.html

This would give the Grizzlies a solid backup at the SF position, which is something they have lacked this year. I’m not sure why Portland would want Hak, given that they have a taller version of him on the roster already in the form of the blogtastic Channing Frye. The swap of Conley and Spanish Chocolate could prove to be a win for both teams, as Conley’s familiarity with Greg Oden and pass-first mentality could be a huge success in Portland with their “Big Three” of Oden, Brandon Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge. Rodriguez is known for his flashy style of play and eye-popping assists, which could prove useful to a team with athletes like Rudy Gay, O.J. Mayo and Darrell Arthur. That is, if they ever decide to move without the ball anyways.
This rumor has been around for quite some time, so I suppose we’ll have to wait and see what comes of it, if anything.

by Norsktroll on Nov 28, 2008 5:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Nah

 Sergio/Outlaw for one, would make sense…adding fill players makes none…there has to be more to this deal…….another team maybe? or future draft picks add ;Bayless is not a point guard..ain’t in the genes

'Liability on defense, is an asset on the bench" a quote from my basketball coach, who believed good defense won games and made the offense a product of it

by 67 on Nov 28, 2008 4:48 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah,

it seems like another trade or two are cooking but I still think Outlaw/Sergio for Conley does good things for all parties.

by oregonslee on Nov 28, 2008 4:52 PM PST up reply actions  

I like this trade.

Out of Batum/Outlaw/Martell, I’m more in favor of trading Outlaw. His personality is great, but he is horribly inconsistent… I feel with Martell and Batum that they are both very, very young with tremendous potential. Outlaw is going to want a larger role in the future, and he’d get that in Memphis. It would be good for Travis.

Conley would be great to pair with Oden. And I love Sergio, but I don’t think he fits this team in the long term. He is fun to watch, but Conley will improve. He’s stuck in Memphis. I mean… Memphis.

honor rasheed wallace

by Cablinasian on Nov 28, 2008 5:06 PM PST reply actions  

i agree

out of our SF (batum/outlaw/martell) outlaw def needs to go. He is a black hole on offense (granted he makes amazing shots, and I def have cheered for him). If you notice, when he get sthe ball the entire team freezes and just waits for him to shoot. so from that perspective, Outlaw would make room to make Batum our full time backup SF which i think strengthens the 2nd unit.

On top of that, I like sergio and his combination with Rudy, but man, i have def not been too impressed with him on Defense or shooting (not to say conley is an upgrade), i just feel like we have seen all that sergio can do, and hes not going to fit our half court, defense first slow ball mentality/

Saying that, Conley looked damn good in college, and i am not sure if he has had the right tools around him to succeed (aka a real center, and not just flashy players and shooters like gay and conley, even though they are good).

so who knows, either way, i would not be sad to see sergio and outlaw go.

Rip City Baby...People have no idea what is coming.

Follow my twitter www.twitter.com/PDXBlazersFTW, @PDXBlazersFTW. Lots of random Blazer Posts from links I find around the blogosphere.

by lanepete on Nov 28, 2008 5:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Agree with you except

I tend to watch specific players on D and I am amazed at Sergio’s improvement,at this point he playing better D than Steve

by southern oregon on Nov 28, 2008 5:37 PM PST up reply actions  

I mean improvement is there

i just worry about him shuffling his feet SO much, but the sad part is i like these players as people….both outlaw AND sergio seem like genuinely nice, cool dudes, so thats the hardest part.

Rip City Baby...People have no idea what is coming.

Follow my twitter www.twitter.com/PDXBlazersFTW, @PDXBlazersFTW. Lots of random Blazer Posts from links I find around the blogosphere.

by lanepete on Nov 28, 2008 5:43 PM PST up reply actions  

I hear you

Sometimes the trade talk starts sounding like a stock auction and people start throwing around words like chump which should only be used if your talking about Bozobury ect. Every guy like Shav who is on a roster has worked his butt off to get there and deserves some respect

by southern oregon on Nov 28, 2008 6:19 PM PST up reply actions  

nothing could be further from the truth
out of our SF (batum/outlaw/martell) outlaw def needs to go. He is a black hole on offense (granted he makes amazing shots, and I def have cheered for him). If you notice, when he get sthe ball the entire team freezes and just waits for him to shoot. so from that perspective, Outlaw would make room to make Batum our full time backup SF which i think strengthens the 2nd unit.

his usage and his ast % is actually 6th on the team very close to Rudy so if you call Travis a “black hole” then you must call Rudy a black hole as well.

Secondly Batum is better with the 1st unit with his D and 3pt skills which are both better than Webster.

"Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. They are working the rest of the league like a speed bag." - Bill Simmons 6/26/08

by SpyderRyder on Nov 28, 2008 6:20 PM PST up reply actions  

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/POR/2009.html

"Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. They are working the rest of the league like a speed bag." - Bill Simmons 6/26/08

by SpyderRyder on Nov 28, 2008 6:20 PM PST up reply actions  

#25

"Aneurysm".

When Outlaw wins a game on a last-second shot, it’s called an "annthefaneurysm". QualityPie

by annthefan on Nov 28, 2008 5:15 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Keep the Travis flag up ;-)

I just think he has more trade value at this point. And Memphis wouldn’t be a bad situation for him. Closer to home, and that team could also become a contender in a few years.

by Norsktroll on Nov 28, 2008 5:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I've missed that.

(sniff) Brings back the old nostalgia.

+1

Poor grammar is poor communication.
Poor communication causes misunderstanding.
Misunderstanding causes fighting.
Fighting causes war.
War causes death.
Therefore, your poor grammar may just kill us all.

(One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season)

by T Darkstar on Nov 28, 2008 5:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I heard that #25

is available in Memphis……and it’s close to Travis’s fishing hole

'Liability on defense, is an asset on the bench" a quote from my basketball coach, who believed good defense won games and made the offense a product of it

by 67 on Nov 28, 2008 5:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Fact?

Do we really think KP told anybody this stuff? Looks to be some media glitter here

Portland has long coveted Conley, in large part because of his childhood friendship with center Greg Oden. Conley and Oden grew up together in Indianapolis, playing together through a Final Four season at Ohio State. Pritchard knows that Conley has the credibility to get in Oden’s face when he needs a push, and that’s played an important part in his trade explorations.

'Liability on defense, is an asset on the bench" a quote from my basketball coach, who believed good defense won games and made the offense a product of it

by 67 on Nov 28, 2008 5:56 PM PST reply actions  

where is that from?

same yahoo article?

Rip City Baby...People have no idea what is coming.

Follow my twitter www.twitter.com/PDXBlazersFTW, @PDXBlazersFTW. Lots of random Blazer Posts from links I find around the blogosphere.

by lanepete on Nov 28, 2008 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

nm

Rip City Baby...People have no idea what is coming.

Follow my twitter www.twitter.com/PDXBlazersFTW, @PDXBlazersFTW. Lots of random Blazer Posts from links I find around the blogosphere.

by lanepete on Nov 28, 2008 6:07 PM PST up reply actions  

Can you wait just a minute....

I’m running an anti-virus scan on my brain. I thought I just read another trade post.

GO
THE TEACHER ......come into my classroom "THE PAINT" for some tutelage.

by Blazer1342 on Nov 28, 2008 6:06 PM PST reply actions  

You need a firewall

"I believe in [Joel]. I just love the way he plays." - Nate McMillan

by jamon51 on Nov 28, 2008 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I've been in the trade Outlaw camp from the beginning

but the way he’s starting to drive the lane and pass out to the perimeter is causing me to pause. And ever since he decided to go for boards, he’s bringing a lot to the table. Now if he can stay constistant with his jumpshot. I’d like to see how things are going before the deadline.

GO
THE TEACHER ......come into my classroom "THE PAINT" for some tutelage.

by Blazer1342 on Nov 28, 2008 6:12 PM PST up reply actions  

He auditioning

for a chance to move back home. Sergio’s picked up hisplay for the same reason. It’s time to move i.

by oregonslee on Nov 28, 2008 6:26 PM PST reply actions  

Outlaw and Sergio keep improving

Not much for trading improving players who have a gift or potential gift for doing something that is oft unstoppable. Outlaw and Sergio are working hard and getting better. I would like to get Connely however. He’s good for our high maintenance Monster right now and would make an excellent third point guard. Bayless is a crap shoot so Ike and Rafe are all I would really want to lose from the team right now.

If Outlaw has to go, I can see and before the year is over but losing Sergio would be a huge mistake.

by Blazersaurus on Nov 28, 2008 6:28 PM PST reply actions  

Bayless

could be a player……an unpolished stone perhaps ….but once they get it down to a finer cut, there won’t be a point guard under there…..

'Liability on defense, is an asset on the bench" a quote from my basketball coach, who believed good defense won games and made the offense a product of it

by 67 on Nov 28, 2008 6:46 PM PST up reply actions  

I have never been a big fan of Conley as a fit on the blazers....

His outside shooting and defense is every bit as atrocious as Sergio’s and he doesn’t bring the passing game that Sergio does. Maybe Conley for Sergio and something else but Outlaw is too much to give up to swap poor shooting/defending points with tons of potential. If this did happen it would be purely to give Oden an emotional boost. For the team’s sake, I hope Oden doesnt need his BFF around to take his game to another level…

RUDY > MJ

by myemic23 on Nov 28, 2008 6:59 PM PST reply actions  

Conley is garbage

I’d take Sergio playmaking, passing, experience, and even defense over Conley.

He looks like a huge bust to me.

BINGO, BANGO, BONGO

by blzrfan on Nov 28, 2008 10:39 PM PST reply actions  

No Thanks

Five reasons why this trade will never happen:

1)KP is smart

2)We can do better
 
3)We’re in no hurry

4)You don’t split up the Spanish Connection just when it’s starting to heat up unless it involves getting a high-impact rotation player

5)Mike Conley is overrated, at best, and doesn’t provide nearly enough of a boost to warrant such a rash move in a lateral (or even backwards) direction

Never mind these foolish rumors. Let’s keep baking until some REAL icing comes along.

"Life is a meaningless sequence of events in between Blazer championships"

by broggerboy19 on Nov 28, 2008 11:53 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

i rather leave things till the end of the season

we are loaded at every position, and i would rather see our guys develop instead of making a knee jerk trade only 17 games into the season, lets at least wait until the all star break to make definative assessments of all players.

also who knows if we have any injury issues later in the season? i dont see this trade as beneficial at this point

by Yawnie on Nov 29, 2008 4:52 AM PST reply actions  

Its my fault

I knew I shouldnt have read this post. I said I wasnt going to do it, but after a somewhat restless night and only one cup of mud, I slipped. Now that I made that mistake I must rectify it.

There is no way this trade is happening and the only reason it exists is because Kevin Pritchard is yanking that sad excuse for a GMs chain because he is obviously so bored with other teams pitifully laughable trade ideas. How long is KP going play this GM out before he draws him in close for the unequivocated Pritch Slap?

How fair would it be to let Rudy’s pal get traded so Greg could have his chia pet-friend Conley aboard? Outlaw being traded for Warrick and Crittendon then doesnt match up talent for talent and we’d be swapping certain chemistry for a lab explosion.

No no no no no. No no no no no. Nope. No. No. Negative. No and NO!!

Some comments may not be 100% accurate

by bow4meow on Dec 9, 2008 7:29 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers lack a winning attitude
Small
The real problem with Felton
Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm