Game 13 Recap: Blazers 117, Kings 96
I really liked this game and I’ll tell you why. We didn’t have to win it. The way we started out it looked like we were in for a long night, giving the Kings life and letting them score and rebound. It felt at best like one of those wire-to-wire games where we escape thinking, “We played like crap but managed a win.” It felt like one of those games nobody would be proud of win or lose. But then in the second half we turned it on, cleaned it up, locked down, and rebounded. Like a MMA fight it was a couple rounds of equal drudgery and then BAM! It was over. Had we been in a cage the refs would have called it in the third period. But see, pay attention here. What better teams did to us earlier in the season--playing so-so and then stretching out for the expected win--we just did to
General Observations
That first half, especially the first period, was rough to watch. I could handle the Kings shooting well. That’s what they do. But all of those offensive rebounds? Scoring at the cup? Easy buckets in transition? The Blazers turning the ball over? Mike Rice said it best when he described us as an inch off on everything. Add a step slow too. Plus even though our threes were falling they were no more than keeping us even as we failed to attack the paint. That was a huge no-no against the Kings.
Then all of a sudden we started going inside again. Lamarcus Aldridge really keyed the attack with Oden, Przybilla, and a driving Outlaw pitching in. Most of our points in the second period came from 15 feet and closer. Our transition defense was still leaky and we were still coughing up the ball but at least you saw a swing in the offensive energy.
After the half we got down to business and all hell broke loose for the Kings. No more rebounds. No more turnovers to take advantage of.
The Blazers ended up shooting 56% to the Kings’ 50% and shot an amazing 54% from the three-point line, making 14 of 26 shots from that distance. If you’re counting that’s 42 points from the arc alone. We bested the Kings on the boards (Do we lose when we do that?) and made the game more or less even everywhere else. Done and done. Good win.
Individual Observations
Steve Blake, you leading scorer devil, you! Earlier in the year opposing defenses were specifically leaving Blake alone to start the game. Look back over the play-by-play charts and see how many early shots he gets. It’s a ton. To draw an analogy to baseball, it’s like opponents intentionally walk the guy before him to pitch to him. Tonight he hit a home run. He had 20 points on 7-14 shooting, 6-10 from the three-point arc, plus 5 assists. . It seems like every time you think Blake is in danger of slipping or losing his spot he finds another level to keep it and show you how silly you were being. After this last week you just have to shake your head and say, “Point taken.”
Lamarcus started the game in his ongoing funk but something really triggered about halfway through the second period. It’s like he remembered who was guarding him. During his recent slump he’s been making easy shots hard. Easy shots came easy again. He made 5 shots in a row and scored 11 points in the space of 2 minutes, 15 seconds. Slump over. He ended the night with 19 plus 6 rebounds and 3 assists.
Brandon Roy stayed quiet most of the night, meaning he didn’t have to take over this game so he didn’t. Other than a couple of forced shots he didn’t stand out. He just played well, as usual. I like that on a night when scoring was pretty easy for everyone he let other people have their share. 16 points on 6-8 shooting, 3 rebounds, 3 assists.
Joel Przybilla had an excellent night, grabbing 10 boards and hitting all four of his shots for 10 points. He even hit a couple of short shots from the post, punishing the relatively weak Kings pivots. He had 2 blocks as well. I loved his game tonight and really have in the past couple weeks. He’s a pro for sure.
Greg Oden collected 4 fouls in 19 minutes, which is not entirely surprising given the nature of the Kings offense. He hit 3-6 shots for 7 points and also got 8 rebounds in those 19 minutes. But did you see that other special aspect of Greg’s game come to the fore against the porous
Nicolas Batum did OK. It looks like opponents are starting to attack him with more vigor now, running him off of screens, banging him around on defense, and making him make decisions. It’s still a process for him. He’s playing well enough while learning. His time may be running short with Martell’s return on the horizon though. 3 points on a three-pointer, 2 rebounds, and a block in 16 minutes.
Travis Outlaw was a nice offensive spark tonight. He kept the crazy shots to a minimum and hit 6-9, including 3-4 from the arc, for 15 points. I would still like to see him get in the lane and draw fouls more, especially against this kind of team, but I’m not going to complain about 66% shooting.
Rudy Fernandez was 5-9 plus 4-6 from distance for 14 points, 4 assists, and 2 steals. Typical Rudy game…catch and shoot, move around on defense, play the passing lanes, help make everybody feel OK about passing the ball and shooting deep.
Sergio Rodriguez didn’t hit a shot but had 4 assists and 3 steals in 17 minutes of play. Blake ate most of the point guard minutes tonight, unsurprisingly. Sergio didn’t even get the benefit of blowout minutes. But to his credit he doesn’t need them to feel special anymore. He only knows one speed, which is full, which is a mixed blessing when managing a big lead. Good game for him though.
Channing Frye looked pretty comfortable again and actually got some extra minutes tonight. He ended up shooting 3-5 for 6 points, 3 rebounds, and 2 assists.
Jerryd Bayless got 5 minutes of floor time and never stopped scowling. He did make 2 of his 3 shots including a pretty layup, scoring 5 with an assist, a rebound, and a turnover. He brought the ball up a couple times and looked OK until he had to set the offense. He looked really good on the drive.
Ike Diogu also played 4 minutes. He looks a little better conditioned than he did earlier this season.
Final Thoughts
Nobody played huge minutes tonight so hopefully we’re rested for tomorrow.
Check out the
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
76 comments
|
Comments
Please bash Blake's head into a camera from time to time
It seems to help.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 21, 2008 11:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Rebecca should wear a pony tail more often
i have deemed it good luck
"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcreaft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. [speech at GOP Presidential Convention 1992] Rev. Pat Robertson
by BlazerFan1 on Nov 21, 2008 11:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, apparantly the Blazers are hosting and ALL and ONLY girls Basketball Camp
infuriating to say the least.
Sophia
"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcreaft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. [speech at GOP Presidential Convention 1992] Rev. Pat Robertson
by BlazerFan1 on Nov 21, 2008 11:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
maybe they'll have an all-male cheerleading squad at the camp
would that make you happy?
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 21, 2008 11:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Does Nic participate? If so I would be happy
I am over it. Nic is hot, I say that 19 times a day at least , so I guess Im being pretty sexist and therefor hypocritical my own self. Humans, sheesh!
Sophia
"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcreaft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. [speech at GOP Presidential Convention 1992] Rev. Pat Robertson
by BlazerFan1 on Nov 21, 2008 11:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you might want get a hold of Nic's official birth certificate before proceeding too far
he’s a young one and they may have padded his age to get into the NBA.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 21, 2008 11:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yer little boy could go watch.
If it was an all ladies camp, i’d want to.
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Nov 22, 2008 6:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dave
You missed the fact that Sergio played some great defense. Not only the 3 steals, but he did it without any personal fouls.
Acquire Serge Ibaka.
by TheGreatDane17 on Nov 21, 2008 11:23 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Sergio's D has been quite commendable lately
Let’s see how he and Blake do tomorrow night—big test.
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 21, 2008 11:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They will probably do better but it will be hard to track b/c they ARE guarding a to PG in the league..
"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcreaft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. [speech at GOP Presidential Convention 1992] Rev. Pat Robertson
by BlazerFan1 on Nov 21, 2008 11:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Did well with Paul.
Congratulations. Nate McMillan has Sergio defending !
by TheGreatDane17 on Nov 21, 2008 11:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
GOod point, he also drew that foul by driving into the lane inhabited by 3 Kings, he made 1 of 2 FT but I was happy to see that agression
"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcreaft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. [speech at GOP Presidential Convention 1992] Rev. Pat Robertson
by BlazerFan1 on Nov 21, 2008 11:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No doubt
Congratulations. Nate McMillan has Sergio defending !
by TheGreatDane17 on Nov 21, 2008 11:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He did pretty well
but honestly I’m finding it hard to praise anyone’s defense when as a team we’re letting opponents shoot 50% on a regular basis. Even Greg’s blocks don’t have the same charm when we’re not all locking down. So I just mention things that show up in the boxscore and leave it at that.
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 21, 2008 11:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Um
In the last two games, we won by 42 and 21 pts. I will take that any day of the week.
by Balian on Nov 22, 2008 12:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
But see what happened?
Because of our so-so defense, our 42 point win was halved to 21, and soon to 10.5, 5.25, and so on.
Before we know it, we’re winning by negative 42, which is a LOSS in my book.
We’re shooting like gangbusters, but when that goes away (and even the best shooting teams have off nights) we need better defense to still be a good team. I’m as happy as anyone that we’re still winning even though we ain’t defending as well as we should and because the schedule is such a jerk, but we got clear areas we need to improve in to ensure we make the playoffs and beyond.
Even if we’re awesome, we can be awesomer and it shouldn’t be a bad thing to point that out.
Morty
by Mortimer on Nov 22, 2008 12:21 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Cutting positive numbers in half
will never turn them negative.
Just saying.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 22, 2008 12:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sez you
Just you wait, pal.
Just you wait.
—M—
by Mortimer on Nov 22, 2008 12:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The length of your comments
is being cut in half.
Will your comments turn negative?
That would be pretty amazing, since we’re winning 55 games this year, and 87 next year, and 98-0 the following. But some people are never happy.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 22, 2008 12:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. +1
(about the defense, not the fuzzy math)
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Nov 22, 2008 6:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was scanning the horizon
farther back than just two games. Nor was I complaining about them. Just noting that fantastic defense has not been a regular part of the Blazers’ repertoire this season yet.
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 22, 2008 12:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No Fouls /= Great Defense
Just because somebody has no fouls doesn’t mean they played good D. The best defenders push it as far as they can. You think Bruce Bowen and Ron Artest never get fouls? :)
If you're paddling upstream in a canoe and a wheel falls off, how many pancakes fit in a doghouse? None! Ice cream has no bones!
by Arby on Nov 22, 2008 1:03 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Przybilla shooting percentage
I know they are mostly dunks, but Przybilla has made 26 of his last 30 shots.
He hasn’t attempted enough to qualify for the official NBA league leader position, unfortunately.
But I think he is doing enough to hold on to his starting position for now.
by unblindloyalty on Nov 22, 2008 12:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
That's largely a factor of where they are getting him the ball
He’s getting himself in the right position, though, credit him for that.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 22, 2008 1:07 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Indeed
and he’s catching it.
The Blazers have a nice inside-outside synergy going now. They are hitting every deep ball they throw up which means the opponents have to single cover (or less) our big men. The big men get a little free, catch, and flush it down, which leaves the outside guys even wider open. I wonder if things will look so nice if we start missing the outside shots. But right now I’m really enjoying the offense.
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 22, 2008 1:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
catching
I wonder if Joel put himself through some catching drills recently. Seems like this year he’s able (usually) to catch and shoot/dunk WAY better than previous years. Obviously it’s partially because of less harassment down there, but I think his confidence is up as well.
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Nov 22, 2008 6:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Joel's catching drills...
…are happening in the games.
He was playing like this in 2005-06 before the injury that kept him out for half of 2006-07. He had a great pick and roll game going that year when the only other offensive play we had was to throw the ball into Zbo then stand around and watch.
After he came back strong last year, though, he wasn’t part of the offensive playcalling. Nate forgot about him. Brandon & LaMarcus forgot about him. Even Joel forgot about himself. As a result he wasn’t used to getting the ball when he popped free in the middle last year. So on the few occasions it DID happen, he sometimes dropped the ball. Which only led to a reputation for bad hands, which kept people from throwing him the ball even more.
This year, Nate put plays back in the book for Oden, and put pressure on the guards to find the big guys down low. That’s paying off for EVERYBODY inside. Joel, LMA, even Channing. Now when he goes down low, he’s EXPECTING to get the ball, and that’s all he needed.
Write-in Rudy for All-Star 2009!
by Majikj0n on Nov 22, 2008 8:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks MajikJ0n!!
Well said and now I don’t have to post it.
by TwoDeep on Nov 22, 2008 9:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The lane is farther open
thus allowing easier and more accurate passes. Really the passes that are going to Joel are of the type where his defender all but leaves him and he’s standing there begging for the ball. It’s a lot easier to catch in that situation than it is when you’re being guarded, in traffic, or on the move.
—Dave
by Dave on Nov 22, 2008 10:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great Description of Roy's Game
We were all watching, and Mike Barrett commented that Roy had 14 points. And my bro on the left said, “It’s like he’s scored so many points and it doesn’t feel like he’s scored at all.” And I was like, “Yeah. Except for… the turnaround in the post, the driving layup, the fast-break lay-in, the 17-footer, those free-throws…” It may not have been flashy, or especially forced, but when you thought about it, it was easy to recall the smooth and free ways Roy had scored to tally his points. The dunk off the Oden dump pass was a really cathartic-looking flush. Roy gave a yell. It was like, ’THIS, FOOLS… is BLAZER BASKETBALL!!"
by FlyingOutlaw on Nov 22, 2008 1:08 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
This is why Roy is a coaches’ selection to the all-star team as opposed to a multi-click vote-in. The people who pay the most attention (coaches) see what he’s doing out there. It’s amazing that even us homers don’t really see it completely. He’s just that good (see the recently posted clip of Kobe praising his game for example).
by Dunemonkey on Nov 22, 2008 1:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta love Oden's assists
Him and Roy are starting to develop a nice two man game
Woof
by Charles Barkley McLovin on Nov 22, 2008 1:10 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
that over the shoulder to channing was priceless.
(or was that to LaMa? Can’t remember.)
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Nov 22, 2008 6:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great win but Channing Frye's defense makes me sick. No effort and the guy never goes for the block.
He only knows how to foul. What a waste of height. I was pretty discouraged when Oden would foul instead of wait for a shot and go for the block. It’s like he doesn’t want to jump anymore. I don’t know what’s going on there but it kind of concerned me.
by BRoyInThe4th on Nov 22, 2008 2:04 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Channing is a dead man walking
and I hate to say that because he is such a perfect locker room and off the court guy.
Basketball-wise though, Channing is Mr. Expendable #1. (before the season I would have said that about Outlaw, but he’s actually trying on defense now and his 3-pointer is ungodly)
by Bust a Bucket on Nov 22, 2008 2:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
i see his fate as deep pine rather than being moved
as he can back up 2 positions on the 3rd string……and there will always be more sprains.
ignacio
by ignacio on Nov 22, 2008 2:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
you may be right
but the question then becomes, “Is this fair to Channing?” And the other pertinent question is probably, “Can someone else (eg, Ike) serve almost equally well in the deep pine backup 4 & 5 asssignment?”
If the answer to the first question is, “No it’s not fair to someone such as Channing,” and the answer to the second question is Yes, then I’d say Channing is indeed on his way out the door to the land of more playing time on a different team.
We cannot put up with this flagrant lack of accountability anymore.
by MT Suit on Nov 22, 2008 7:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ike is no backup 5
Perhaps Freeland next year.
Ike is IDEC as much a Raef is RLEC.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 22, 2008 7:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My apology to Steve Blake
A few nights ago, I posted about trading you Steve. Then you injured your head. Then you screwed mine back on. Consider me now, humbly, in the “trade no one but RLEC” camp.
by Nathan Jr on Nov 22, 2008 3:51 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Some thoughts on a GREAT win.
first off:
“What better teams did to us earlier in the season—playing so-so and then stretching out for the expected win—we just did to Sacramento. The growth process continues.”
Could not agree more. It was awesome to see that slow transformation from so-so, to dominant.
Secondly:
PRZYBILLA THE THRILLA.
The folks at the (Brooklyn, NY) sports bar lamenting another Knicks loss musta thought I was on even weirder drugs than I’m normally on when (clad in Trail Blazers shooting jersey and black top hat) I started shouting GHOSTFACEPRZYBILLA! THE THRILLA KINGSKILLA! and slapping the bar. Seriously, I tried to explain it to the disinterested guy next to me: I love Oden off the bench. Puts the veteran on the floor to set the tempo at the post, then after 9 minutes, this huge beast enters the game to take on … the other team’s back-up center? PLEASE! That’s like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight.
OKOK …
Thirdly (tertiarally?):
LaM shakes off the funk. Ugh. the first quarter, I figured we were in for another funky LaMarcus night. My only hope was that by game’s end, he’d figured it out and would be ready to bruise and bomb on Phoenix. Like Princess Leia, my only hope came through. LaMarcus figured it out and BOOM. Run for cover.
Fourthly:
And this hardly requires emphasis, but we shot the stars out from beyond the arc (and everywhere else). DO NOT MAKE THIS YOUR GAME. Yes, it’s a huge bonus, but I hope Nate is telling our boys: “Great job. Now let’s run over these plays that don’t require you to drill 30-foot bullseyes all night.”
One sentence summery?
“Wonderful.”
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Nov 22, 2008 6:03 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I agree I love when the 3's are droppin but it wont last so we gotta step up the D
"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcreaft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. [speech at GOP Presidential Convention 1992] Rev. Pat Robertson
by BlazerFan1 on Nov 22, 2008 10:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
17 minutes
is about right for Sergio. You can find your rhythm in 17 minutes. Plus, Blake was on fire.
by rmcdougall on Nov 22, 2008 7:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Greg is already a more willing passer than LaMarcus
While LMA played really well last night, it bothered me a bit again that when he goes to work backing down his defender, he almost never looks up/back again. He usually takes that shot, even if it’s contested. On several occasions, Nic or Rudy were running themselves free at the top of the three point line, waiting for a pass to take the open shot. It never came.
by Norsktroll on Nov 22, 2008 7:34 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
really, he had a number of great passes out to blake for some of those three's he it.
This thread needs more COWBELL!!
by Zaron5551 on Nov 22, 2008 9:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A Kings fan point of view
I thought the KIngs were especially buoyed by New Orleans on Wednesday, to the point where they were orbiting on another level for the first half. Even though they weren’t finishing inside, the turnover’s created, and the level of activity inside for most of the half was promising.
That is, until LMA went off. That’s when I knew the Kings weren’t going to win. By the late 3rd I just fell asleep because I knew the Kings were going to blown out, if for no other reason, the Blazers had too much firepower working last night. The way they played last night, they could have beaten any team in the NBA. Usually I don’t think Blake would have gotten the open 3’s he got, but the Kings are weak defending the 3 too. It was a recipe for disaster from the Kings end all game, and it’s a good thing the KIngs lost. But ti’s not like I’m dis-illusioned or anything about this Kings team, quite the opposite actually, what I was disappointed with that the Kings couldn’t keep the game close.
I think the Blazers are a team hitting their stride, and because they’re as healthy as a NBA team gets during the season, with LMA playing the way he did, and with Blake playing at high level, it meant that Roy barely made a ripple. Even putting on the finishing touches, this means the Blazers should go out & beat the Suns tonight. Because if you ask me, winning last night means nothing without a victory against the Suns tonight.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Nov 22, 2008 7:50 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
Winning last night means an awful lot. Good teams beat the teams they should on the road, and we’re doing that. Good teams will sometimes beat teams like the Suns on the road, but not usually.
If we lose last night and beat the Suns, it could just be a fluke (like someone winning in New Orleans). If we win last night (and we did), and compete against but lose to the Suns, we did what is expected of good teams. If we win last night and win tonight, that is also what good teams do — win the ones they should, steal a few you wouldn’t necessarily expect.
On top of last night’s win, the only thing a win in Phoenix proves is that we are good enough to win a tough road game. We already proved that in Orlando. A win tonight would be a really nice bonus, but prove nothing that we didn’t already know.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 22, 2008 8:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The KIngs winning in Nawlinz wasn't a fluke
But, you being a Kings fan wouldn’t understand that. It was reflective of 2 things: The Kings willingness to play hard, and Nawlinz being a discombulated mess right now.
Sorry, but the Suns aren’t a better team than the Blazers. You lose to teams like the Suns, especially with the depth the Blazers have, on the road in situations where you blow a young/hurt/ripe for the taking every game Kings team, and you lose to the Suns the next night, all that means is that the Blazers are still a middle of the pack playoff team. Championship teams make goals for themselves that few teams can accomplish, and winning tonight’s game, is that kind of goal.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Nov 22, 2008 8:04 AM PST up reply actions 2 recs
Even I
don’t think we’re more than a 4-5 seed, and the Suns aren’t worse than 6-8 seed. More often than not, when a 4-5 seed plays at a 6-8 seed, they’ll lose. They’d win a series because of home court advantage and perhaps getting one on the road.
We aren’t a championship team yet, and winning or losing tonight won’t change that evaluation. We’re a good mid-seed playoff team right now, and winning or losing tonight won’t change that, either.
But winning will sure be a lot more fun, if it happens. And the experience might be one more little step on the journey from good to great.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 22, 2008 8:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmmm
Sure didn’t play like it last night. Granted the Kings weren’t perfect, by any stretch, the Blazers played like a veteran team that could turn it up last night. Maybe I’m projecting, but this team is ready for some prime time. Part of that is having a big friggin A ego, and losing it a bit in some gut wrenching moment down the line, and then coming back for ultimate success. Right?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Nov 22, 2008 9:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is hilarious (ok maybe just ironic)
The Kings fan (who’s team just got beat) is proposing to the Blazer fan that the Blazers are a championship contender….right now. The Blazer fan’s position is that the Blazers are just a middle of the road playoff team.
What? Did I just slip into Bizzaro-BEdge, somehow
"Fez, the foundation of any good relationship is three little words: I-don't-know.
What're you doing? I don't know.
What're you thinking about? I don't know.
Who's that under you? I don't know. "
-Michael Kelso
by 92wastheyear on Nov 22, 2008 9:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why not?
If the Blazers are a top 4 seed in the West, that isn’t a championship contender? What does me being a KIngs fan have anything to do with that?
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Nov 22, 2008 10:01 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing other than a observation
that this type of conversation is usually switched around …with the Blazer fan arguing that the Blazers are a contender and the Sacto fan sayin’: “No way…middle of the road playoffs…tops”.
On drowning my daughter before she becomes a teenager (to my son)-"You know how when you want to drown someone, you first tied something heavy to the their foot?" My Son: "Yeah?" Me:"You are the something heavy"
by 92wastheyear on Nov 22, 2008 10:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not taking it personally
I think this Blazers is ready for the bottom tier of playoff contention. Just because they didn’t make the playoffs a year ago is hardly for reason to eliminate them now for such reasons.
I don’t get it. My point was an observation too. I could care less if the Blazers win a championship; it was merely an observation watching a team that was playing a team coming off an emotional high, and acted as such, then sorta picking it spots, and then exploded for the win. That’s one mark of a championship team. Especially on the road.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Nov 22, 2008 10:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bottom tier of championship contention is what I meant
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Nov 22, 2008 10:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No offense intended
Your points are valid. I was just pointing out that it was unusual who was making the points (added to the fact that the home team fan was taking the opposite position). You don’t see that every day is all
On drowning my daughter before she becomes a teenager (to my son)-"You know how when you want to drown someone, you first tie something heavy to the their foot?" My Son: "Yeah?" Me:"You're the something heavy"
by 92wastheyear on Nov 22, 2008 10:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The team I support is not relevant to my analysis
I am always RIGHT, no matter what. If it looks like I might not be right, I will do my best to bend reality to my will. Thus it is and shall be, lest my ego become deflated.
Deflating an ego as big as mine results in a Cat-5 hurricane, so this is to be avoided.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 22, 2008 12:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
"....results in a Cat-5 hurricane"
You are in europe right? That would be a 1st….hurricane I mean
On drowning my daughter before she becomes a teenager (to my son)-"You know how when you want to drown someone, you first tie something heavy to the their foot?" My Son: "Yeah?" Me:"You're the something heavy"
by 92wastheyear on Nov 22, 2008 4:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I set trends
get used to it.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 22, 2008 11:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Bottom tier of a championship contenting team? that makes no sense
"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcreaft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. [speech at GOP Presidential Convention 1992] Rev. Pat Robertson
by BlazerFan1 on Nov 22, 2008 10:42 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Think about it
Chew it over. Run it between the gums a few times. Do whatever you want with it.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Nov 22, 2008 10:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
just dont swallow
"Brandon Roy is your favorite restaurant" - Dave
by Sabonis4Ever on Nov 22, 2008 11:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL ya got it
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Nov 22, 2008 11:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It makes perfect sense
and I agree with him
by Falcao on Nov 22, 2008 12:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here's what I think, pookey
I think we’ve got a team that is going to win around 55 games. That means a legit 4 seed or so. I’ve been called a homer, but that was my prediction at the start of the season (55 wins), and it isn’t looking as stupid to a lot of people as it was when I made it.
But I also think we aren’t a championship contender, really. Too young, no experience. We could beat anybody in the playoffs. No one will want us in the first round, not even the L@kers. Young and talented teams are mega-scary — but also inconsistent.
We could easily sweep or be swept in the first round, no matter how many games we win in the season. The talent is there to sweep, the inexperience is there to be swept.
But I am pretty sure that the inexperience will nail us somewhere between the first round and the WCF and we’ll get knocked out.
So, I think your description of how we are playing, and the talent we have, is right on the money, but that doesn’t mean we’re championship material yet.
Now, does that mean it can’t happen this year? No. The talent is there to win 60+ games, have homecourt all the way through, and make it all the way to the Finals. But is all that young talent really going to be developed enough to do that, AND click together well enough to do that? Well, maybe, but we aren’t there yet. You saw a great team, but we just lost at Golden State in a game we probably should have won. A championship team would have won it. Youth and inexperience. Youth and inexperience.
If we keep winning our home games, beating up on the T-Wolves and Kings and Heat on the road, and steal the occasional game at teams like Orlando as well, we’ll win a truckload of games for the season. That makes us a quality playoff team, with the talent but not the experience to win it all.
And that kind of team hopes to win a game in Phoenix, or Houston, or N.O., here and there along the way. But it doesn’t change anything, really, whether we do win any particular one of those. We’ll still be mega-talented, extremely deep, and very raw and inexperienced. That’s just life as a Blazer fan — for this year.
Next year, we may make a run at 65 or more wins, and the world will tremble in fear.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 22, 2008 12:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not trembling yet
Or, probably ever. I really think our definitions & POV’s (point of view’s) were looking at different angles. So, we’ll see I suppose now.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Nov 22, 2008 10:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well in a completely objective sense , the Win last night is a Win which goes into the Win column and no matter what happens at the Suns, it will always be a Win.
On a more subjective level, I think If the Blazers lose tonight to the Suns in a hard fought battle (much like our loss at New Orleans) where we keep it close and play super good defense it will not be a terrible thing . The Blazers are better, not real championship level YET but much better so saying if we dont win in Pheonix , on the road , on the 2nd game of a back to back we invalidate the progress that has been made, well , my friends (haha) that is just sillines (or a bitter fan) .
Sophia
"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcreaft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. [speech at GOP Presidential Convention 1992] Rev. Pat Robertson
by BlazerFan1 on Nov 22, 2008 10:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Not bitter about it
I’m bitter about Ricky Berry whom I can’t find YouTube Clips of. You wanna talk about bitter, you’ll lose this conversation hands down.
No mistakes in the tango, darling. Not like life. It's simple. That's what makes the tango so great. If you make a mistake, and get tangled, you tango on
by pookeyguru on Nov 22, 2008 10:52 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I just swung by SacTownRoyalty
They have the game reaction up. Good stuff. Only quibble I have with it is the Math. “Losing to the Blazers By 17 is Not Really a Big Deal”. I am pretty sure that losing 117-96 in actually losing to the Blazers by 21.
On drowning my daughter before she becomes a teenager (to my son)-"You know how when you want to drown someone, you first tie something heavy to the their foot?" My Son: "Yeah?" Me:"You're the something heavy"
by 92wastheyear on Nov 22, 2008 12:58 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
17
is our official max losing margin. 117-96? That’s a 17 point loss. 102-66? 17. 4,003-7? 17.
Humor us. It makes us feel better and we need all the help we can get.
SACTOWN ROYALTY - Try our thick creamy shakes!
by section214 on Nov 22, 2008 9:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ah got it
I was wondering if I missed something. I mean…Sacramento may be less sophisticated than San Francisco…But I was pretty sure they taught math there. Now I know
On drowning my daughter before she becomes a teenager (to my son)-"You know how when you want to drown someone, you first tie something heavy to the their foot?" My Son: "Yeah?" Me:"You're the something heavy"
by 92wastheyear on Nov 22, 2008 10:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for explaining
It’s always good to know how things work in the state capitols. This explains some of the political news we read from time to time, I expect.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Nov 22, 2008 11:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, Dave
Great recap.
If you say "basically" at the beginning of a sentence, you probably also put ketchup on everything you eat.
by CosmoPlavix on Nov 22, 2008 1:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 
























