if your saying that he is that better than what we have now, why he would be the 4 option? When Roy, LMA, and Outlaw plays, Outlaw is the 3 option and sometimes even the 2 option. Now if Outlaw plays in the 2 unit he is the 1 or the 2 option. So if Al is so better Outlaw why he would be 4 option?

this would be assuming oden is back and healthy, and on offense our third option, then harrington would be our third best option, and maybe martell has to come off the bench

I like Al Harrington, but not for this team.
It might work out all right, but just dont think he right for our team.
He did have a great season for Atlanta several years ago.

That’s not exactly a compliment, either. Basically, Harrington is a high-scoring combo forward who brings little else to the table — which includes medicore defense and no notable intangibles — thus, he’s not a worthwhile option.

Is another “me-too” player in the mold of Shawn Marion and Zach Randolph. They believe that they ought to be the star of the team, and when they don’t get enough touches or minutes, they will pout and mope and ask for a trade. He’s done it everywhere he’s been.

Not suited for our culture.

Due to Jim O’Brien’s love of the 4-high/1-low motion offense, Harrington is a decent fit within the Pacers’ offense. A swap of Harrington and Marcus Williams for Jamaal Tinsley and Travis Diener — who’s a Dan Dickau clone — would probably benefit both teams. Despite Tinsley’s dwindling value, he’s a much better option at point guard than DeMarcus Nelson and C.J. Watson; also, the departure of Harrington opens up gobs of playing time for Brandan Wright and, to a lesser extent, rookie Anthony Randolph.