Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Using Rudy at full potential.

Hi, i'm from Spain and this is my first post here. I've been watching NBA for several years and the Spanish League too. IMHO Roy is hogging the ball too much, too much isolations all the time, he burns all the advantage that the second unit gets in the begginings of the 4th quarter. Yes, eventually he is clutch, but it seems that he only passes to  the people that he has played these 2 years with. He doesn't involve Rudy at all in the offense. He shoots at a very low %. There's more ppl in the team that can do that.  I don't understand it.  I see Brandon in the 4th quarter taking those ridiculous tough shots (travis Outlaw too).... IMO the offense runs smoother if there's ppl cutting like Rudy etc.  I hadn't seen too many Blazers games, but what i see is the offense is very stagnant, and LMA is all the time getting jumpshots and not attacking the basket? Wtf.

Do u find good at all 8273823 isolations for roy??, He is good but for me te offense should be different.

 

8 recs  |  Comment 237 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Rudy for pg.

The Faith don't panic, the faith freaks out burns out farms and torchs small villages in the name of The Faith.

by faith on Nov 10, 2008 9:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

not really

You should expand on that more otherwise you’re not adding anything to the conversation.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 9:58 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Alot of people have been complianing about Nate's offense being stagnant

I think that with more pieces, now we are seeing more movement. The Blazers have been waiting for players and for players to develop more.

I also hope that Nate will add more movement. He seems to want to have it all, and demand movement from the other team being compelled to double team. We should have the tool set together to allow him to do that soon.

There once was a Sea’ Cap’n Nate
Whom with Blazers did negotiate.
The pool, t’was so deep!
"That KP don’t sleep."
Gold medals and rings were his fate.

by LaoTzu on Nov 13, 2008 1:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

I’m not a fan of the iso’s either, unless he has a mismatch. Sometimes they’re good, but I get tired of watching them all game. I do love Roy’s game. I love Rudy’s also.

Give the team time, everybody, including Nate, is still learning about each other. They’ll get it……

Witty Unpredictable Talent and Natural Game

by iDea on Nov 10, 2008 9:29 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Welcome to the site...

but you can’t start like that.

Roy won the game for the Blazers by asserting his offense from minute one to the final minutes. They iso him all the time because he’s nearly unstoppable. He has every move in the book and makes defenders look like fools.

LMA was all outside tonight. He was straight fearing Dwight Howard (for good reason). But the last game he dominated on the inside and low block.

Flat out, we don’t win without him.

I know you probably have some real bias for Rudy, and everyone over here loves him. But Roy is the Blazers.

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Nov 10, 2008 9:29 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Sorry for the start, mb i am a litle bit biased, but I try to be objective. I like Roy a lot and if I criticize him is because he is able to do much more than what h is doing. The thing is that i don’t see Roy guiding us to a championship by himself, like kobe of lebron could do. He has to trust more his teammates in the 4th quarter, cause against teams like LA or Boston we would lose by playing this way I think. Sorry for the start :)

by Kartemax on Nov 10, 2008 9:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

don't you remember the pass to Rudy at the end of the Utah game to tie it?

If you have watched the Blazers for awhile you would know that Roy makes a lot of plays for his teammates to get open shots. Adding Rudy to the mix is one more weapon Roy has to use.

Roy had 9 assists last game. And that is from our top scorer.

If you have a problem with the offense, that is on the coach, he is the one who calls the plays. I agree that we need more movement on the offensive end, but it is unfair to place that on Roy’s shoulders.

by JasonT on Nov 10, 2008 9:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I watch like 2 games a day of NBA, and all the games in which a Spanish is playing… I’ve watched all the blzers games, even the preseason games. I don’ t think that a guy can loose the confidence in another guy just because of one shot.
About the 9 assist, man yes he passes the ball, but i’d like a more unselfish Brandon. Cheers.

by Kartemax on Nov 10, 2008 9:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

wait...

only one preseason game was on TV, how did you watch the others?

There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man — with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)

My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.
Season Tix: Section 315, with my sons

by johnv59 on Nov 11, 2008 11:53 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I watched all of them

Through the powers of the internet!

Things happen for a reason they say, but I say there's a reason things happen.

by sixth on Nov 11, 2008 9:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Me too, but

the Clippers preseason game was not on anything

There is probably no more terrible instance of enlightenment than the one in which you discover your father is a man — with human flesh.
Paul Muad'Dib - Dune (Frank Herbert)

My Translation: My Dad is a dude just like me, and my sons are dudes like me also. I love that.
Season Tix: Section 315, with my sons

by johnv59 on Nov 12, 2008 10:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

have you watched the Blazers?

Roy gets the ball and the offense grinds to a halt, as everyone thinks about being in position to receive a pass, if one comes and Roy isolates his defender and tries to win the game by himself. Note: Often enough he does. But the poster is talking about team offense v. individiual offense. We’ve been talking about it all over this site for the last week!

by Blazin' on Nov 10, 2008 9:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Jordan

Ran alot of Isos too, even when Pippen was available.

That’s it, I am creating a new Goodwin’s Law. Every time someone bashes Roy, I will personally evoke a Jordan reference!

Blazer's fan since '84, Currently exiled in San Antonio

↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A

by HurraKane212 on Nov 11, 2008 5:41 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

GOOD PLAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Nov 11, 2008 1:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Running lots of isos for Roy when we are playing Orlando is OK, because none of their perimeter players are that good defensively. However, if Ron Artest, Bruce Bowen, Kobe Bryant, etc. are guarding him, Roy is going to miss more shots than he makes and turn the ball over frequently. Also, if we start to get dependent on having Roy create all the offense by himself, it will increase the chance of him getting injured.

I am not sure that it is Roy’s fault though. The coaching staff probably deserves some of the blame for letting him run so many isolation plays and not having a more sophisticated offense. It sounds like they are in the process of installing some new offensive sets right now, so hopefully our offense will start looking better soon and not be as dependent on Roy isos.

by trk on Nov 10, 2008 9:54 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

+1

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Nov 10, 2008 9:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

confused

you say you think roy should be guiding us to a championship like lebron or kobe but also say roy is taking to many tough shots in the fourth quarter and running too many iso’s. you can’t really have one without the other, if we want a leader to help us win, it has got to be one willing to take the pressure and make those tough shots later in the game. I think you are contradicting yourself a little. roy is much more of team player than kobe ever has been.

"Great Oden's raven!" - Ron Burgandy

by danevan on Nov 10, 2008 9:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

but

someone has to run the plays and draw the offense or else spot-up shooters like rudy won’t score a point. roy is young and taking on a huge load, he is being encouraged by the coaching staff to take more shots and is doing just that. We got the W so I dont think people should be complaining about it.

"Great Oden's raven!" - Ron Burgandy

by danevan on Nov 10, 2008 11:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You should not be sorry

you are so very “spot on” about your assessment….the offense is stagnate<———Due to him but not Roy…..Roy is only doing what the coach wants done….the offense has been stagnate because it is all we have had, up to now…..It’s time to move on, and we are painfully realizing this…..We have a very predictable. slow and low key offense and Roy slows it down considerably..It is not his fault, as the coach has demanded too much out of him( He is not a penetrating point guard and when the play starts with him, it drops the full potential of the offense down a couple notches and it is limiting his output as well)…You are right, we are wasting a lot of talent, by sticking to this offense….You have to involve everyone out there to keep defenses honest…Rudy, Batum, and sometimes Sergio, give this team some mobility and energy…..
   I do think there is some confusion by the coaches…..they want to stick with what got them to where they are now….but it is never a good idea to stand pat….if they want to get to the next levels. adjustments in the offense will be necessary ….I hope they are professional enough to realize it and bite the bullet …..
     there has been so much hype about this years team, I think they are somewhat caught up in between and are waiting to see how everyone plays together……I think they will find, that remodeling their offense will be a good plan
     However, I saw a lot of flaws in the offense last year and I am surprised they have stuck to it, so diligently, coming into this season…they are trying to build this team around Roy and LA, and they should…..But there has to be a more effective way …maybe down the road, we will see some changes….

by 67 on Nov 12, 2008 9:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

For the life of me...

I do not get the Rudy vs. Roy thing. Why can’t people root for both players to do well? Aren’t they both Portland Trailblazers? If do well (which they are) then we have a better chance to win. This rivalary makes no sense if you are fan of the Portland Trailblazers. If you are fan of Spanish players only, then it makes sense.

Maybe Dave should change the name to Spanishedge?

by JasonT on Nov 10, 2008 9:35 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

kartemax, you are smart

i’ve been watchin the team for a long time and i’m thinkin the same thing,,,roy is hogging the ball, tryin to do too much, and almost cost us some games,,,that we still won. it’s alright though, they’re learning, they’ll get the feel for eachother, they have too, and they will. Roy isn’t a 25-30 pt score. He doesn’t have to be for our team to win… i do think that Roy is threatened though. RudyF is the real deal and is a future star…Sergio needs more clock too, and tonight he got some and we played good with him in there,,,not to mention we are much funner to watch when he is playing,,,,

uwe blab

by midget on Nov 10, 2008 9:41 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Don't you mean, "Sergio needs more shot clock?"

Even the Orlando announcers said, “Sergio Rodriguez is putting on a dribbling exhibition.” Tonight he had two plays, dribble a lot and pass to Rudy and dribble a whole lot and pass to someone with 5 seconds left on the shot clock.

by tominhawaii on Nov 11, 2008 4:04 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Correctamundo, Tomás, the scales are at last falling from your eyes...

"I’m glad Sergio played well in pre-season, but he should be getting killed for whining. He ain’t that important to the country of Spain, let alone the Trail Blazers." --Mortimer Pritchard

by timbo on Nov 11, 2008 8:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I still like Sergio

I’m a fan of the entire team.

by tominhawaii on Nov 11, 2008 9:09 AM PST up reply actions   1 recs

"I’m glad Sergio played well in pre-season, but he should be getting killed for whining. He ain’t that important to the country of Spain, let alone the Trail Blazers." --Mortimer Pritchard

by timbo on Nov 12, 2008 1:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

weeeeeeeeeeeeee

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 1:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He makes a good point

And it’s been made here before: Roy plays slow, Rudy plays fast. Roy works best with the ball in his hands, Rudy plays best off the ball. There are some major style differences with these two. Roy is still shooting a subpar percentage and has been poor from 3 point range.

With that said, I have complete faith that they will get it figured out.

by AndrewD on Nov 10, 2008 9:43 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Roy works best with the ball in his hands, Rudy plays best off the ball.

You’re right, how could two players like that ever fit together….

by pualo on Nov 11, 2008 12:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Kartemax

Welcome! This is a good question.

I’m going to mention in my game recap tonight that Rudy had a hard time when he was given the ball tonight in order to create his own shot off the dribble. This is not a new phenomenon. The defenders in the NBA are strong and quick and they’re making it hard for him to get a decent look. His quick movement and the ability to get his shot off quickly really come into play when somebody like Roy has the ball first. Rudy would not prosper right now if you had him taking most of his shots off of the dribble.

—Dave

by Dave on Nov 10, 2008 9:51 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Hi! Dave i must say that love ur posts.
About Rudy shooting off the dribble, yes, I noticed that he is not making his shots, but we made it against Prince in the gold medal game, bryant etc. I think he is very capable of breaking down the defences. Partly I think it’s has something to do with the few touches of the ball that he gets sometimes, and then he forces a shot.

by Kartemax on Nov 10, 2008 9:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yes, but the gold medal game was different than a normal NBA game

A normal NBA game has stronger and tougher defenses. Dave’s point is valid.

by Love on Nov 10, 2008 10:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

uhhhh, what?

That gold medal team played great defense. It helps when you only have to play 20 minutes a game but those guys are all the most gifted basketball players in the NBA. There’s no way a normal NBA game compares to that squad.

WWKPD?
Ambassador to the Miami Heat

by Magnum on Nov 10, 2008 10:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

team defense always sucks on the U.S. national squad

OK. It doesn’ t suck. But it’s not exactly a strong suit. Let’s just say that. Rudy playing against Kobe and Prince in the Olympics is not the same as Rudy playing against the Fakers or the Pistons. That makes sense to me and it’s a good point.

The perfect is the enemy of the good.

According to James Kunstler, who writes a well-respected if slightly profane financial blog whose title I cannot repeat here, "The Republicans must be clearly identified as the party that wrecked America... it's hard to imagine the American people giving the clean-up task to the very group that created the mess -- no matter how many cute little faces Sarah Palin can make on TV."

by vavoom on Nov 10, 2008 11:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

It's not that he's not making his shots

I could live with that. If he were getting good shots that just rattled in and out I wouldn’t mention it. The problem is the shots he is getting off of his own dribble are not good at all. I don’t mean that as an insult to Rudy! His shooting is inspired, brilliant, professional, and effective when he’s setting up for a three or giving a quick fake and then stepping back or sideways and drilling it. He’s also flat-out amazing at catching those Sergio passes and putting the ball in at impossible angles. I say that so you see I’m not missing how wonderful he is. But tonight, for instance, when he had the ball at the top and tried to drive into the lane or even clear space for an open shot he was putting up off-balance, leaning, one-footed attempts that barely caught the rim. If I have time this evening I will look back through the game and give you the exact quarters and minutes of the examples.

In general throughout the season (though it’s still early) Rudy has been superior as a conduit or an endpoint for the offense when the ball starts somewhere else. He has been pedestrian or worse when the offense starts and ends with him. This is part of what makes him so great for the Blazers right now. He can fit in with any lineup, including one with Roy, because he benefits when Roy (or Sergio) draws attention and then kicks him the ball and he really helps them by giving them someone to pass to.

I believe Rudy will become a competent one-on-one scorer in the NBA with time but I don’t think that time is here yet. I also don’t think it would really benefit the Blazers that much more if he did start creating more shots for himself right now. He’s darn near perfect for the offense doing just what he’s doing.

—Dave

by Dave on Nov 10, 2008 10:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That's a good point Dave...

I see Rudy as a more athletic version of Reggie Miller. Great at coming off of screens and catching the ball while in motion…not as effective when the ball is given to him out top stationary and he is asked to generate the offense.

He is perfect for this team…b/c he is such a good compliment to our playmakers. But he needs someone to deliver the ball to him, for him to get off his best shots.

by JasonT on Nov 10, 2008 10:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I never would have made that comparison

But its actually a pretty good one. So far this season I’m very impressed with Rudy’s versatility and how well he has grown into the role given to him.

Honor Terry Porter

by Philthyanimal on Nov 11, 2008 12:39 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Why wouldn't you want Miller?

Miller was incredible at crunch time and NEVER stopped running. Ginobili is always injured. I’ll take Miller.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 10:03 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

okay, gotcha

Rudy is one dimensional. It’s called the hustle like crazy dimension. Actually, I think there’s a comic book with a character that had rudy’s powers of being all over the place at once. He died of some mutant disease though.

I bet his girlfriends LOVED him.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 12:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think anyone is asking for us to run a lot of iso plays for Rudy

What I want to see is more ball movement, and more player movement. I don’t want to see lots of iso plays for Roy. I don’t want to see iso plays for Trout. I don’t want to see iso plays for Rudy. I would like to see the team play like a team, using screens, player movement, and passing to set up players with high-percentage shots.

by trk on Nov 10, 2008 10:56 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

and people....

it is quite possible to talk about the role Roy plays in the offense without questioning his ability or leadership.

by Blazin' on Nov 10, 2008 11:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

OK, but keep in mind too

that Roy himself is adjusting to a new role which will take time. It’s important that he be comfortable because we win when he’s comfortable. I imagine as the season progresses he will be able to set Rudy up more (though his assist total is already as high as any of our point guards). Meanwhile Rudy is comfortable and prospering right now. He’s not exactly looking hobbled out there.

—Dave

by Dave on Nov 10, 2008 11:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed

the high amount of iso plays this year compared to last year have disappointed me a bit.

Honor Terry Porter

by Philthyanimal on Nov 11, 2008 12:40 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The iso's are OK occassionally

or when Roy has an advantage. When he is going one on one with Artest, Koby, Bowen, etc. he doesn’t have an advantage. Especially against teams like those w/ strong interior defense.

by crakarjack on Nov 11, 2008 9:51 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think you'll see more ball movement when Marty returns

He was doing a lot of running off of screens and moving away from the ball. Somewhat similar to Rudy, actually. Could end up being a fantastic 1-2 punch (wear the SF defender out guarding the Black team, then wear the SG defender out guarding the White team).

by DonkeyShins on Nov 11, 2008 11:00 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I know

I’m DROOLING for Martell to get back. I like the idea of a closing team as follows:

PG: Roy
SG: Rudy
SF: Martell
PF: Aldridge
C: Oden

That line up is so sick I don’t know how you would defend it. You can have double screens along the baseline to free up Martell and Rudy while running a pick and pop with LMA and Roy. If anyone is double you either have automatic points in the paint with Oden a 3 from Rudy or Martell or a drive for Roy or an open shot for LMA. I just don’t know how anyone could stop that if we keep the motion going underneath while Roy and LMA operate up top.

He's Coming! Oden Slayer of Giants

by Idog1976 on Nov 11, 2008 2:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not only would that be a good offensive lineup

I think that would be one of our better defensive lineups as well. Domination on both ends of the court.

by trk on Nov 11, 2008 2:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I love it

Loved to watch how Rudy and Martell were clicking together in preseason. I love it when we run

by DaniBCN on Nov 12, 2008 1:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Funny

with that many +1s you’d think you’d get an actual rec

"I believe in [Joel]. I just love the way he plays." - Nate McMillan

by jamon51 on Nov 11, 2008 6:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I don’t see that as a Roy issue though. I see that as a bunch if individuals that haven’t figured out how to play as a team yet issue.

I fully believe it’ll correct itself, but right now our guys are too young, too new, and too… something (cause you know things should come in threes), to be able to do that just yet.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 10:05 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

International game is different . . .

     wider key, different officiating, etc.

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Nov 12, 2008 12:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well put Dave!

I hear a lot of people commenting on Rudy being better than Roy. If you look at the dominant teams throughout history they had an unstoppable offensive force. Who could take any player in single coverage. This causes the other team to adjust to your game instead of the other way around. When you combine his ability to get his shot and distribute you get that offensive force…which is near impossible to stop(Ron Ron). Rudy is a great addition to this team and he brings some new things that the Blazers have been lacking. We love his enthusiasm and pizazz. He has a knack for finishing around the basket and from deep! The catch is that he gets all this off the ball and in the NBA, the best defensive teams are long and quick and will shut it down. Name a team that has won the NBA championship this way. Reggie Miller was a phenom similar to Rudy. How many rings does Reggie have. No ultimately this is Brandon’s team unless someone can take it from him.

by The Natural ala Mode on Nov 10, 2008 10:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Is Roy a better 1-on-1 player than Kobe?

If he isn’t then it is simply impossible for any team that depends on having Roy score of isolation plays for the bulk of it’s scoring to win the championship.

The Lakers teams from a few years ago was dependent on Kobe providing the bulk of their scoring. Kobe was good at it, to the point where he even scored 81 points in one game. He averaged over 35 points per game one year, carrying his team to 45 wins and a loss in the first round of the playoffs.

There are a lot of great 1-on-1 players in the NBA, but even the best of them aren’t able to carry a team the the championship by themselves. To win a championship you need to have a good team that plays like a team.

by trk on Nov 10, 2008 10:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But every championship team has a least one guy who can always get his shot

you can’t win without one. My point is that it takes a variety of playing styles to be successful. We really needed what Rudy brings, a slashing scorer with a great shot and excellent cuts without the ball. We really need Roy for clutch plays and as a steadying force. Lma is our bread and butter scorer (without him we’d starve).

I agree there has been way too much emphasis on Brandon in Isolation. But also notice he only does this usually in the second half. He also sets up his teammates well. Brandon has not had a dynamic wing like Rudy to throw lobs to at the rim for highlight assists. But in due time Brandon will find Rudy at the rim.

Last but not least, we are a team assembled greater as a whole than its individual talents alone. Nobody puts up earth-shattering numbers but having 5 guys score 16 or more in the same game is phenomenal. We are a team built with many shooters and now we have a couple of cutters in Rudy and Batum. We are still lacking our inside presence (Oden) but we get by. A lot of that is due to the consistency of Roy and Lma. Rudy is giving us consistent points off the bench worthy of a starter. His role will grow as Coach Nate finds additional ways to incorporate his skills, and the other guys become conditioned to the amazing things we can expect from him. Watch and enjoy. I surely am.

by NWfan on Nov 10, 2008 11:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Pistons won a championship without that one guy who can always get his shot.

 They had an awesome concept of team offense with richard hamilton being a huge part of that. Even if he wasn’t scoring his motion created opportunities for his team to score. With Roy handling point duties at end game and rudy out there our offense could look a lot like the pistons did back then.

 But still I think that they just need time, i’d say roy and rudy already play great together for only doing it for a few months and It will only get better.

by tevisthe4th on Nov 11, 2008 3:01 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Rasheed can but doesn't

Rahseed can get his shot on any PF in the league, however he often prefers to defer to his teammates (and then focuses on D). ’Sheed came alive in pivotal games. Billups and Hamilton carried the load and Sheed finished teams off.

by NWfan on Nov 11, 2008 11:35 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How are you forgetting that many of Roy's assists come of Isos?

It is just plain wrong to think the Isos aren’t benefitting the rest of the team. Most of the made three pointers we have come from pentrationg, which came from the Iso. It’s absolutely mind-boggling that people don’t realize how well those Roy isos work.

Pay attention to the next game. Most of Roy’s isos end in either a lay in, a dish to a teammate or a three pointer. THAT’S JUST WHERE THE OFFENSE STARTS, NOT ALWAYS WHERE IT ENDS!!!!!!!

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Nov 11, 2008 1:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

I think Roy had a little something to prove against Artest in particular. Well Roy consider it proven and don’t feel you need to take him yourself. When Roy is really open to anything happening off his Iso it works like a charm. When he feels the need to dominate a defender by himself, which is what happened on the last play of regulation versus Artest by Roy’s own admission, then things dont’ work quite as well. I agree that if Roy is in the flow without anything to prove a Roy Iso or LMA pick and pop is darn near the best thing we have going. My only quibble would be to run some screens down low for our shooters along the baseline while Roy is begining to operate up top. This would give an open look and new lanes of attack for Roy if the timing was right.

He's Coming! Oden Slayer of Giants

by Idog1976 on Nov 11, 2008 2:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wasn't it fun . . .

     watching Ron Ron chase Rudy around and around
the picks ! and of course, BRoy breaking Ronnie down
on several occasions ! Loved it !!

     COINCAST SUCKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Nov 12, 2008 12:27 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ever wonder

if there were bulls fans who thought Scotty was better than jordan?

I’d love to have seen the bulls team with jordan and without pippen for a year. It takes a team and Jordan wouldn’t have done it by himself any more than pippen did.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 10:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Rudy has

already gained respect. The biggest issue is familiarity. Roy and Rudy are both Alpha’s they can work together but it’s a little more difficult to incorporate two Alpha dogs in the same attack. It’s only a matter of time though and we will see closing situations where the other team looks helpless. Once Oden and Martell are back in the swing healthy and in shape other teams are going to weep.

He's Coming! Oden Slayer of Giants

by Idog1976 on Nov 11, 2008 2:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

that respect HAS to be there. It’s more about knowing where your teammates are moving and your teammates knowing where they’re #$#@#$@ freaking SUPPOSED to move.

Rudy knows where they should be, but doesn’t know where they are. Other teammates don’t know where people are supposed to be.

Time will fix all this.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 10:08 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The respect is already there

My guess that cbp’s use of “respect” was more of a translation thing. Probably a better term is “familiarity” or maybe even “chemistry.” I wonder, do the folks in Spain use that term as it applies to sports? Are there American restaurants in Spain (not counting fast food)?

Lets face it. Oden is coming back, and that’s going to mess with whatever chemistry that was built in these past few games. Once everyone gets used to one another, Webster is going to show up. We have an idea of what we have, but we won’t actually see everyone playing together fluidly until 2009.

The Blazers are 4-3 without Oden and Webster, this season is already off the hook and somehow the team is not living up to people’s expectations. The Blazers are only going to get better.

by tominhawaii on Nov 12, 2008 10:51 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ah...

I phrased poorly. I meant to emphasize that the respect is there, but not being there I can’t say that but how can it NOT be there because Rudy is a freaking stud. So… the respect HAS to be there because it couldn’t possibly NOT be there.

Hopefully i either confused the heck out of you or made myself more clear. I’m up for either.

As for respect being a chemistry thing, that makes sense.

As for living up to expectations. The record isn’t as important to me as how jumbled our guys have been out there at times and games. I’d rather win playing well than win paying poorly. (note that losing wasn’t an option).

I just expected our team to have that chemistry faster. Of course, we had injuries and all that, but if we DIDNT have it, Nate should have played that UTAH preseason game.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 12:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

really it all comes down to Nate

hmmm… think we should fire him?

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 12:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

thanks Tominhawaii. That was what I meant "chemistry".

No we don’t use chemistry. We use “team play” although it starts to be used more often the word chemistry. We use to say “they can play with closed eyes” meaning they know each other very well.

As for the American restaurants I just know McDonalds, Burger King, Kentacky fried chicken and Hollywood.

by cbp on Nov 12, 2008 3:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

no idea

but I like eating fish rather than meat. I am from the northwest of Spain where there is a big sea tradition.

by cbp on Nov 13, 2008 12:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

America's finest restaurants

… ouch. No wonder the US is hated by the rest of the world.

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 13, 2008 12:06 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Exactly. And why? Roy’s desperate, inspired, scrappy play is why this team got to .500 last year. Now he has to learn to play with the team and stop carrying the team so we can get to .600!

As long as Nate is on the same page, I think he will come around. We are seeing longer stretches late in the third/early in the fourth quarter where we are not just grinding.

 Managing the egos of your stars is another important coaching skill that we are counting on Nate to have/acquire.

by Blazin' on Nov 10, 2008 9:53 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Welcome!

Running the offense through Roy is our bread and butter. It won the blazers 41 games last season and is working pretty dang well so far this season. Although Roy might be forcing some of his attempts, I am happy to see him take his aggressiveness up a notch. One of Roy’s weaknesses in the past has been that he has been too passive from a scoring standpoint. I am glad he is looking to score as much as he can.

I was actually talking to my friend tonight about how well Rudy is fitting in. I love how he doesn’t try and dominate the ball and falls in line with what the team wants to do. He is so smart and unselfish it makes me blush. He knows he has to work his way in and let the game come to him. As he gets more acclimated with Roy and the blazers system, the ball will come to him more often and his shot attempts will increase.

Outlaw bugs me a little bit with his shot selection, but its hard to argue with the results on most nights. Now that he appears to have added a legit 3 point shot, he is really becoming a factor in my opinion. Although I wouldn’t mind a few less contested fadeaways from Outlaw and a few more pull up jumpers from Rudy, we are winning. And that is all the matters in my mind. Rudy is only going to get better considering he is only 7 games into his nba career. This is only the beginning for the smooth criminal…

RUDY > MJ

by myemic23 on Nov 10, 2008 9:55 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

+1

It’s the fact that roy is the player feared by opposing teams that is creating shots for guys such as rudy, blake and martell (when healthy), we need roy out there running plays, penetrating and colapsing the offence to draw in the D and set up those outside shooters, Im a huge rudy fan btu dont think his rookie season would be looking nearly as strong without roy doing what he does.

"Great Oden's raven!" - Ron Burgandy

by danevan on Nov 10, 2008 10:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree but I disagree about rudy, He would be this successful on any team in this league.

Maybe more so on a weaker team, he just has too many skills to say that his success depend on another player.

by tevisthe4th on Nov 11, 2008 3:05 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think i disagree on this

depending on the team, Rudy could be shut down. He’s adjusting to the style of play here and if defenses are able to exclusively focus on him, he’s going to be shut down here.

Luckily, we don’t have to find out. I love how he fits on this team, and i’ve been a rudy fan for three years now.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 10:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think there are some teams in which Rudy would be less sucsessful, but also some teams where he would be more sucsessful

For instance, imagine how effective Rudy would be if Phoenix hadn’t sold him to us. If Rudy were playing next to Nash in Phoenix’s run-and-gun system, he would be able to get a ton of easy shots.

by trk on Nov 12, 2008 10:35 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree 100% on that

Still, i definitely love him on this team because it lets us have ALL sorts of line-ups to mess with other teams.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 12:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm glad you say "us"

otherwise, I’d just think you were a Rudy homer who would prefer to be posting on the Suns blog (A$$ crack of the Sun, or whatever it’s called) right now.

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 13, 2008 12:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed on trout

granted im not a huge trout fan, but trout has added quite a few subtle nuances to his offensive game. he has been catching and shooting a lot more this year…rather than dribble a few steps after being wide open. i also like how he went from someone who could hit the 3 sporadically into a legit 3 point shooter. although i like martell and batum starting, trout could be used as a starter in spot situations.

Honor Terry Porter

by Philthyanimal on Nov 11, 2008 12:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Get out of my head!

I don’t know how many times you have seemingly stripped grey matter from the inside of my skull and splattered it all over Blazersedge. Once again Myemic spot on and well said! +1

He's Coming! Oden Slayer of Giants

by Idog1976 on Nov 11, 2008 2:30 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

great discussion started by a thoughtful fanpost -- thank you Kartemax

All the posters so far have made important points. All of the points are valid. And I believe perhaps AndrewD said it best when he suggested that we give them time to figure out how best to play together.

Frankly, I get somewhat weary of Roy’s absorption of the ball and his sluggish way of getting going with it. I’d prefer to see more passing and more cutting. More movement in general would be more interesting to watch and probably more effective in terms of beating opponents.

I’d like to see Roy distribute the ball a little more. No question about that. Trouble is, Roy is very good at doing what he does, and we tend to win when he is on his game. So we’re not going to change right away because that would be a settback.

But I suspect that Kartemax is going to get his wish as the season wears on. Rudy will become more involved and Roy will learn how best to blend his game with Rudy’s talents.

by Love on Nov 10, 2008 9:58 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I agree this was a very good fan post

You’ve generated a very healthy discussion, which is typical of Blazersedge.

on a side note Who else loved the way Rudy made Artest chase him all over the court in the third quarter. That really allowed Brandon to even get his one one one game started, because Artest was gassed (at least initally when Roy came back in).

by NWfan on Nov 10, 2008 11:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I loved that....

It made laugh watching Rudy running around the court like the Tazmanian Devil…Artest was dying. I would love to see more of that. Martell also does this very well. But Rudy is faster.

by JasonT on Nov 10, 2008 11:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

i was thinking the same thing…i was watching the ball handler and couldnt help but notice the blur that was rudy all over the court. i diverted my attention over to rudy running around and he gets fed the ball and scored. i loved it.

Honor Terry Porter

by Philthyanimal on Nov 11, 2008 12:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The point gets missed here....

Why can’t Roy get his shots/drives while playing out of a team offense?

by Blazin' on Nov 10, 2008 10:08 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

truth

Iso and the 2 man game has always been Brandon’s strength. KP and Coach raved about his pace. This is his pace, as in slow and steady which is a stark contrast to Rudy’s speed and quick shooting.

by The Natural ala Mode on Nov 10, 2008 11:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1, well put Blazin'...

I think this is the frustration that many people are having. Roy isn’t seeing other players sometimes while he’s forcing a tough shot ala Trout or Bayless. This isn’t like Brandon and I think it will change as the team gels.

Having said that I think Nate needs to put Roy and Rudy together in practice more and work on developing a strong chemistry between the two. I think developing the chemistry between Roy and Rudy is one of the keys to us taking it to the next level.

by Wotan on Nov 11, 2008 10:24 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The bitter feeling I get out of that

is that it should be done with another guard, I don’t think it could work for long as Roy’s main skill as a PG is his pick’n’roll and Rudy doesn’t have enough PG skills to be the main ballhandler

by DaniBCN on Nov 11, 2008 11:27 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think the missing point

Is the elephant in the room. Although not directly addressed the problem lies with the lack of a solid point guard, not to mention the wacky rotation and the sets developed for an overwhelming center that isn’t there.
Roy had to take over in the fourth and get what he could in the two man game with Aldrige or the drive and kick to James or Webster/Outlaw in order to win the games they won last year. That isn’t a complete team. Roy can’t bring himself to give up the drivers seat when the team is still finding it’s legs. The answer isn’t for Roy to hand the keys to Fernandez, the answer is a full function offensive flow. That won’t happen until Greg is back on his feet, and even then maybe not until a clear winner of the point guard sweepstakes emerges.

by pxilpooshr on Nov 10, 2008 10:17 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

;)

nicely put.

by Blazin' on Nov 10, 2008 10:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

great point about oden.

i wrote a few weeks back about how he was coming out to set very high screens for roy during practice. this was creating a lot of ball movement and much less isolation. the defense was forced to commit more resources to stop brandon/oden. the ball moved weakside more regularly if oden was in the game and the overall flow would continue.

honor terry porter

by Ben. on Nov 10, 2008 10:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Right right

Maybe that Oden star quality, in addition to his size will help him to avoid all the illegal pick calls that Pryzbilla attracted last year. Man, after tonight it makes me think the refs in this league have a festering hatred of poor Joel. It’s all that bad press from Shaq me thinks.

by pxilpooshr on Nov 10, 2008 10:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

he’s an easy mark

honor terry porter

by Ben. on Nov 10, 2008 10:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You need to be patient

Rome wasn’t built in a day, and the Rudy-Roy connection will take time to develop. Don’t try to anticipate that there will be problems in the future between the two based on the first 7 games of Rudy’s rookie season. The more telling stat of when these guys will mesh is the level to which Rudy cuts down his turnovers. It seems that many in the fanbase (and the organization) are willing to live with Rudy’s turnovers (even if they are a consequence of his playing style) because of the number of skills he brings to the table, and I don’t think that he should be getting a free pass. Just like Roy is adjusting to Rudy, Rudy needs to make continued efforts to unleash his energy within the flow of the offense (which don’t get me wrong, he does quite well already). But the fact is, Roy is the NBA all star, while Rudy is the rookie. Regardless of the accolades Rudy has received throughout his career (deservingly, I might add), the burden of adaptation, if you will, rests on Rudy’s shoulders as opposed to Roy’s.

Funny thing is Rudy is my favorite player on this team. I even got his jersey.

by premthegrem on Nov 10, 2008 10:22 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Rudy has only had 9 TOs in the first 7 games

I think that is pretty good for a rookie guard who is getting as much playing time as Rudy is.

Rose and Mayo have 21 TOs each in their first 7 games.

by trk on Nov 10, 2008 11:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Roy just needs to adjust to having Rudy with him

I truly believe that Roy will almost always make the right decisions with the ball. whether its passing it or taking it to the hole, I think Brandon always has a reason for what he is doing.

OT
Travis is shooting 67% from 3 for the season, just thought I’d throw that out there

by Jiggamant on Nov 10, 2008 10:23 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

It's not about Roy's decision-making

It’s about our offense when Brandon has the ball.

by Blazin' on Nov 10, 2008 10:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Blazers are probably not...

Using Rudy to his full potential, but I doubt there is a rookie in the league that is being used to his full potential. The season is young and getting the most of new players almost always takes time. The NBA is a marathon and the Blazers are pacing themselves.

On the other hand, the team has been surprisingly efficient at the offensive end of the floor thus far:

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/hollinger/teamstats?&action=login&appRedirect=http3a2f2finsider.espn.go.com2fnba2fhollinger2fteamstats

I don’t like the somewhat repetitive nature of NBA offense, but the 24 second shot clock places some real limitations on teams.

by PoliSam on Nov 10, 2008 10:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I think that there are some rookies who are actually being used above thier potential

You see some teams with rookies (usually very high draft picks) run lots of plays for their rookies and force-feed them the ball even when they aren’t efficient enough to warrant such treatment.

by trk on Nov 10, 2008 11:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Living in seattle, i saw A LOT of that for Durant last year. Not that i dont think Durant will become an amazing player….but yeah…it got ugly sometimes.

by moflow on Nov 11, 2008 5:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Blazers offense has been one of the best in the league...

… on a points per possession basis. I haven’t had a problem with Roy’s shot selection at all. Could Rudy be used more effectively? Sure. Its a work in progress. However, I like what we’ve seen so far— Rudy has contributed a great deal but its still Brandon Roy’s game to win down the stretch.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Nov 10, 2008 10:34 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Rudy vs. Roy is weird

I don’t see how Blazer fans would not support that both of these players succeed. If you’re only interested in seeing Spanish players doing well, then that is one thing, but for Blazer fans to root for one over the other makes no sense.

by JasonT on Nov 10, 2008 11:05 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

It doesn't make sense, but it's what Blazer fans do

Once Bayless starts playing, the hate will rain down upon Blake with a ferocity that has not been witnesses since Lot’s wife peaked over her shoulder on her way out of town.

by tominhawaii on Nov 11, 2008 4:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sergio needs to be moved. All else follows naturally and logically.

"I’m glad Sergio played well in pre-season, but he should be getting killed for whining. He ain’t that important to the country of Spain, let alone the Trail Blazers." --Mortimer Pritchard

by timbo on Nov 11, 2008 8:39 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm agree +1

Both, Roy and Rudy are great players and they are trying their best.

and they are very diferent too!!

the kind of isos than Roy can play are diferent than Rudy could. Roy is much stronger and Rudy “reads” better the court. Rudy is moving all the time because is his style and because he knows than hes not able to 1-1 against the big defenders…anyway… Howard is quite big and he was able to dunk because he was on the basket before Superman got there (so wasn’t really a"on your face". Rudy isn’t Vince Carter).

Rudy needs all the teammates to be involved in the offense, moving the ball fast, to be able to go to the rim
Roy can create his own shots any time and be very efective on that but dont let flow the offense.

just my point of wiew

 Another point: Rudy Have been coached ALL his professional live by Aito and his way to play is oposite from Nate’s one (He’s like the Spanish Mike D’Antoni). So… i think in this escenario Rudy is doing extremly good.

with some time they going to play good together….. but is NOT giog to be easy job.

Go Blazers!

by tacus on Nov 10, 2008 11:05 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Didn't know that about Aito

That makes me even more impressed with Rudy.

by moflow on Nov 11, 2008 5:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Rudy strenghEST thing is not just his basketball skills but his team aproach mentallity.

He can adapt himself of whatever team needs because what he looks forward to most is WINNING.

by cbp on Nov 12, 2008 9:38 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

further...

Its great to have so many fans from Spain who read this blog. You provide a perspective that we in the US don’t have, and you have watched Rudy for much longer than those of us in the US have. You guys are a great asset to BlazersEdge— almost as great an asset as Rudy is to the Blazers.

Rudy has had a fantastic start to his NBA career. He’s played with confidence and style and he’s been very efficient with his shots. He has clearly shown himself to be more than an average rookie, and he is very deserving of the 30 minutes per game he has received.

However, Rudy is still a rookie and he has joined a team that was pretty decent last year, winning half of its games. This is Brandon Roy’s team, and Roy has already compiled a long list of 4th quarter heroics— the Houston game was hardly his first. I’m somewhat troubled by the claim that Roy is “hogging the ball.” Roy has indeed had a few games this year where he has struggled with his shot, perhaps taking too many. However, the claim that he is a selfish player is one that nobody who has watched Roy before this season would make. Roy is one of the best passers from the SG position in the league.

Roy already trusts Rudy. We saw that at the end of the Utah game, when Roy passed to Rudy for a potential game tying 3 pointer. As they continue playing together, that trust will grow, and Rudy will become a bigger part of the offense.

Fans of Roy (such as myself) love Rudy. There is no reason for Rudy fans not to love Roy. In time, they will be a great tandem.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Nov 10, 2008 11:06 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

+1 tacus

This is why the Rudy vs. Roy thing is not weird (although putting it that way kind of is). Their play is representative of two fundamentally different approaches to the game of basketball.

It doesn’t mean that they won’t figure out how to find the middle ground. It means it is going to be quite a fascinating process.

by Blazin' on Nov 10, 2008 11:15 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I'm sure its hard for Rudy to adjust to a new team...

… after playing with such a gifted PG like Ricky Rubio for so long.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Nov 10, 2008 11:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Rudy has adjusted very well,

don’t you think? I am more interested in how the Blazers adjust to him. It is happening already in lots of little ways…. Blake’s head is a little more court aware when he drives. Travis is beginning to pass the ball a little more creatively. Blazers are starting to fill lanes on fast breaks….

by Blazin' on Nov 10, 2008 11:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

absolutely

I didn’t mean to suggest he wasn’t. I give Rudy a huge amount of credit for this— both Blake and Roy are obviously completely different players than Ricky, but Rudy has managed to be very effective right from the start.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Nov 10, 2008 11:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

As is Roy

and most of hte blazers. That’s another reason I love this team.

Roy played for Washington (or Washington state… dont’ remember) and he had talented players that he played with. He made those guys looked good and his stats never stood out. They left for the NBA and he stayed in school. His senior year HE was the man with no one else to really make look good (who had that ability) and so HE took over and dominated. Roy had that ability all along but he generally prefers to make those around him better.

When Roy and Rudy learn how to play together… add in some Aldridge and Oden…

There will be no stopping this team. I drool.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 10:18 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Going into the fourth quarter...

(Assistant Coaches to Nate) : We need points but all our offensive schemes we worked on in the preseason revolved around Greg Oden, and there’s only so many Sergio to Rudy ally oops we can pull off before they get wise and body check Rudy back to Spain. What do we do now!?

Nate: Well, let’s take a look at last year’s 4th quarter play book.

(Nate pulls out a three ring binder with one sheet of college-ruled notebook paper with the words…)

GIVE BALL TO ROY…. and pray
Nate: Here guys, run this.

Yea, there are a lot of ISO’s being run for Roy down the stretch right now which is frustrating to watch when the shots don’t fall, but hopefully our offense will get better as the season progresses. In preseason, the priority for working rookies into the offense probably looked like Oden>>>>>>Rudy>Bayless>Batum, and now we’re relying on Rudy+Batum. Also, it’s gonna take longer than 7 games for Brandon + Roy to figure out how to play off each other effectively, right?

by comeon.toshi on Nov 10, 2008 11:19 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Am i the only one that likes watching Roy isos? also, the teams best player has to take over games in the fourth quarter. our best player is Roy, so therefor he will take more shots in the fourth quarter.

by OOKEY on Nov 10, 2008 11:30 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Heck no!

I think I watched that Roy hand switch on Bosh last season at least 20 times. A thing of beauty.

by JasonT on Nov 10, 2008 11:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you are not the only one

It’s awesome watching Roy break down premier NBA defenders 1 on 1 and make them look like scrubs.

It’s also awesome watching Rudy’s movement away from the ball on the offensive end. I don’t see the two being mutually exclusive as the season progresses.

lickety-brindle

by Billy Ray Bates on Nov 11, 2008 8:08 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I love it

I understand that too much of that interferes with offensive flow and continuity and other important buzzwords like that, but man, yeah I get all hot and bothered when Roy gets the ball up top and I know he’s gonna find some way to punk his defender 1-on-1. No, it doesn’t all work, but it is easily our most reliable offensive weapon right now.

by shralpster on Nov 11, 2008 10:33 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of that

On the NBA.com highlights of the Orlando game, there’s a drive by Roy where he fakes a right handed layin and Dwight flies right by as Roy lays it in right at the rim. Certainly not anywhere as spectacular as his switch of the hands on Bosh, but definitely shades of that. Man, I love watching Roy drive hard to the rim.

by shralpster on Nov 11, 2008 10:35 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Despite the unfortunate reference in the second sentence

your post has sparked some interesting discussion. Thanks for posting.

"The match in Los Angeles is a good opportunity to begin to demonstrate that we want to make war." Rudy Fernández (translated)

by G_dubs on Nov 11, 2008 12:46 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

What does not work well is an offense of Blake, Rudy, Roy (and Travis) at the same time

In this setup often Roy handles the ball. That factually makes Blake into the shooting guard on offense, a role in which he is almost useless, unless gets the ball open for a catch and shoot. I still like Blake, but creating his own shot is even less his strength than Rudy’s right now, and he doesn’t move that well without the ball.

I think there is also something to Kartemax complaint that Roy seems to overlook Rudy and instead goes one on one or for a pass to Travis (who then goes one on one himself). The same phenomenon exists with Sergio and Rudy. In this setup, Rudy gets the ball a lot, maybe even too much. Both of this needs some work.

They should make the best use of Rudy’s ability to run around so much and quickly that it looks fairly easy for him to lose his defender even if no picks are set for him. Just imagine if they would do it more. I could see Nate designing plays that have Roy handling the ball, Rudy dashing around, then Greg or Joel setting a monster screen for his defender to swat him like a fly, and Rudy getting the pass for the open three. Triple, triple, triple. Or a good chance to drive to the rim. A thing of beauty.

by Norsktroll on Nov 11, 2008 1:48 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

we havent used it much

but i believe it was the houston game where we went 3 guards…and Rudy was handling the ball. I think it was only 2 or 3 possessions, but the offense seemed more active when Rudy was handling the ball vs when Roy is…but that is probably by design or the fact that Roy slows the pace a bit.

If we were to use 3 guard lineup regularly this year, I’d rather see bayless or sergio in instead of blake. we would have enough scoring from roy, rudy, lma, travis.

Honor Terry Porter

by Philthyanimal on Nov 11, 2008 3:20 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I like your idea...

I also like the idea of Rudy feeding Roy in the low post, when Roy has a weaker defender on him. That will put a tremendous amount of pressure on the defense. If Rudy’s man helps out on Roy, then Rudy is wide open. If Rudy’s man does not double Roy, then Roy gets a high percentage look at the basket. Rudy also is a threat to cut the hoop and take a pass from Roy in that situation. Of course this may not work too well if Oden or Joel are in the game, but with the Frye and Aldridge as our center and power forward…it will spread out the defense and allow Roy and Rudy some room to operate.

by JasonT on Nov 11, 2008 7:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

gotta be patient guys

one of the issues we got at the moment is we have so many weapons to choose from, i guarantee everyone once everyone knows each others game a bit better, people will fear the blazers.

however this usually takes a good amount of time, i think it would be unfair to judge after 7 games, all of which have ben affected by injury, will then require more time for analysis.

but the evidence is there, 4th quarter vs orlando was a thing of beauty, just imagine when it will be more regular, and the other time cannot prepare properly since we have too many quality players in both the first unit and second unit.

in fact even now i dont think teams can properly prepare for broy, LMA, rudy, outlaw, etc etc

by Yawnie on Nov 11, 2008 3:13 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Theory: Pritchard

is conducting a not so subtle experiment with Sergio, Rudy and Batum. He’s building an NBA/European hybrid.

I wonder how the coach feels about it. While it may give us a shot at greatness, it sure makes Nate’s job a lot more challenging.

Throw an uncertain GO in the mix, and you have the most challenging coaching job in the league right now!

by Blazin' on Nov 11, 2008 3:23 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

more challenging than

fixing the mess that isiah left behind?

Honor Terry Porter

by Philthyanimal on Nov 11, 2008 3:35 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

it did occur to me when I wrote that

that D’Antoni has his hands full too! What do I know, anyway!

by Blazin' on Nov 11, 2008 3:39 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

D'Antoni

seems to be doing alright!

lickety-brindle

by Billy Ray Bates on Nov 11, 2008 8:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

NBA/European hybrid

Having an NBA/European hybrid isn’t really a new idea. That is basically what the Spurs are now. KP worked for the Spurs before he came to Portland, so it wouldn’t be surprising if he brought some of the Spurs’ philosophies to Portland.

by trk on Nov 11, 2008 11:37 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Some of you still believe

this is about Roy v. Rudy! Its not! Its not about who gets more shots or us having to wait for them to develop an understanding. This is about an isolation type of offense v. player movement/sharing offense. No Blazer fan is trying to pick one player over another. If we are going to win Championships, we are going to need a more sophisticated offense that suits the players that we have. We all can see that Roy needs the ball in his hands and Rudy doesn’t so why don’t we see more of Roy driving while Rudy runs around screens to catch and shot. Nate was talking in Pre-season how he wanted to get the team to play more inside out but I don’t think that it will be enough. We still need guys cutting and setting screens. Its no coincidence that we score easier when we have player movement. When Roy/Outlaw goes 1 on1 the rest of the guys tend to stand and watch. The less of that the better. I say!

by VinnyB on Nov 11, 2008 3:50 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

tempo and timing

are super-important to the pass/attack mode that you see from the Euros. You know who plays like that, is Steve Nash. Pushing pushing looking for the imbalance/ weakness in the defense. And then passing with off-timing, out of sync with the tempo note like a great pitcher’s change-up.

When you are used to watching that style, it is very frustrating to watch Blake and Roy pass up every opportunity the defense gives in transition or through movement and run these stagnant half court plays.

That is not to say that it doesn’t work!

But that maybe is what is lost in this thread: You really can’t play both styles of basketball at the same time! Different tempo and timing required.

by Blazin' on Nov 11, 2008 4:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You have to factor in our experience level as well...

I don’t think that Nate wants the offense to stall when Roy gets the ball, but our team is young all the way around and might not be ready to have sophisticated offensive schemes. Sometimes trying to do too much with your sets can end up hurting you more than it helps if the guys running them are making the wrong decisions and getting in each others way. Nate has only laid the groundwork for our offense since adding Rudy and Oden. As the season progresses, he will add in wrinkles to the offense that create more player movement. I think right now he is worried that people will end up in the wrong spots and probably in Roys space, so he has most players doing simple things that keeps the offense from breaking down completely and going into a pick up style scramble. I am sure our offense will only get better as the season goes on and our guys continue to learn what Nate wants to accomplish…

RUDY > MJ

by myemic23 on Nov 11, 2008 10:05 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Roy is the best Blazer player right now

but I’d love to see him get much better playing off the ball, that would make the offense run smoother and in the end have a great influence on the team

by DaniBCN on Nov 12, 2008 1:27 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So how bout them Blazers huh?

Rudy is amazing. Roy is amazing. They will be amazing together.

It’s too early for me to come up with any analysis right now :)

Rudy for ROY
Campaign 08-09

by twiggs on Nov 11, 2008 6:30 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Twiggs this is the most absurd post ever.

The only thing good is the RATIONAL and EVEN KEELED posters who righted this ship w/ logical analysis and sensible responses to eachother’s arguments.

Rudy and Roy are fine. They are playing remarkably well together if one considers the time they have had to adapt to eachother’s playing style.

AT this point, I want Roy w/ the ball at crunch time for obvious reasons .

Sophia

"Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcreaft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians. [speech at GOP Presidential Convention 1992] Rev. Pat Robertson

by BlazerFan1 on Nov 11, 2008 10:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Kartemax Roy makes exactly what Rudy did in DKV Joventud.

If you loved the Rudy’s role in DKV Joventud (former Rudy’s team) you have to love what Roy makes although it seems Roy abuses too much by isolating the game when there are 4-5 minutes left.

I think he can do that but in the final 1-2 minutes not when there are 5 minutes left.

by cbp on Nov 11, 2008 7:00 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Rudy had no Brandons in DKV

Here u have more possibilities for ur best player, and we are not taking advantage of them.

by Kartemax on Nov 11, 2008 7:05 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

sorry for double post

With the post above i’m not saying that Rudy is our best player xD

by Kartemax on Nov 11, 2008 7:07 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

thank Kartemax

this has been a good discussion. I am a huge fan of both Roy and Rudy but have caught myself thinking the same thing about Roy at times, seeing him with four defenders collapsing
on him and holding too long, but at other times he is “the man” and I love what he does. At times there is not enough movement, but I think this team will improve greatly as it learns what all these new players can and cannot do.
   I am really excited about all the Blazer fans in Spain, I think If we take the best of international ball and American ball we will be unbeatable!

by twggyy on Nov 11, 2008 7:18 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

To the point of Brandon going iso too much -- point well taken. Brandon plays the same sort of game as the much slandered Zach Randolph -- he takes the ball and scores the ball.

There’s really nothing wrong with that as long as that is not ALL the team is doing for long stretches. This tendency will draw double teams and open up shooters or lanes to the rack; he just needs to mix it up a little, which he is smart enough to do.

"I’m glad Sergio played well in pre-season, but he should be getting killed for whining. He ain’t that important to the country of Spain, let alone the Trail Blazers." --Mortimer Pritchard

by timbo on Nov 11, 2008 8:43 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Brandon is no Z-Bo

He’s averaging 5.7 assists right now, last year he averaged 5.8. . . Zach, at his best, averaged 2.2.

5.7 assists, by the way, places him 5th among top 25 scorers (Lebron, Wade, Parker, Paul, tied with Stephen Jackson(?)). That’s more than Kobe, Kevin Martin, Kevin Durant, Joe Johnson, Vince Carter, Paul Pierce, Richard Hamilton. . . he might not be working at his best with Rudy, but its not because he doesn’t know how to pass.

by marble47 on Nov 11, 2008 9:00 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Brandon is a 2 and plays at the top of the key; Z-bo is a 4 and plays low... Compare Assist Apples to Assist Apples...

"I’m glad Sergio played well in pre-season, but he should be getting killed for whining. He ain’t that important to the country of Spain, let alone the Trail Blazers." --Mortimer Pritchard

by timbo on Nov 12, 2008 1:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not really. Both play iso ball. One is deified and the other is vilified.

"I’m glad Sergio played well in pre-season, but he should be getting killed for whining. He ain’t that important to the country of Spain, let alone the Trail Blazers." --Mortimer Pritchard

by timbo on Nov 12, 2008 1:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

the difference...

is that Brandon knows how to react when he’s double teamed.

It’s a good point though even if you touched the naughty button and got people all worked up about it.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 1:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

one is a leader, one is not

one can pass, one cannot
one plays defense, one cannot

Its true that they both score on iso plays. That is the only thing they have in common.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Nov 13, 2008 1:25 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was comparing Roy to former Blazer Zach Randolph

or, rather, telling Timbo he’s wrong for making that comparison.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Nov 13, 2008 11:55 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

nice post by and large...

..lots of people feel similar, but, people tended to believe roy’s downside (from last season) is that sometimes he’s too unselfish, i think this season the coaches have given him the keys to the car and he’s still figuring out how to program the radio stations, where the spare tire is, etc. It’s a catch 22 situation when the fate of the team rests on your shoulders, if you pass it, and your teammate misses, (rudy against utah), you’ve failed, if you shoot, and miss, you’ve failed. Everyone is whining that the blazers should attack the paint, and when roy does, he’s being “selfish” or “not looking to distribute.” Can’t please everyone.
Also, as a bystander it’s easy to yell at your TV “pass it to Rudy, he’s open,” but rudy is always getting open, that’s doesn’t mean he should always get the ball when he is.
I love Roy and Rudy’s styles respectively and the longer they are on the court together the better their chemistry will get.

by appel82 on Nov 11, 2008 9:32 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

This is a great discussion. I definitely think Nate is relying on Brandon’s isolation plays too much. However, this is partly due to Rudy being a rookie and not having fully adjusted to the league. Rudy has already shown what he can do off the ball, but he has been struggling with the ball in his hands trying to create. Dave had a great comment about this earlier, basically, he is not getting good looks off of the dribble. It is not that he is particularly bad with the ball in his hands but at this point in his career he is unsure of how and where he can get good shots off the dribble. I am confident that with time he will figure this out and we will see fewer Roy iso plays and more a combination of Roy/Rudy putting pressure on the defense to create shots for themselves and the others. However, with the game on the line we are still going to go to Roy isolated at the top and let him create. This is our bread and butter play and Roy has shown he is capable and willing to either make the shot or get the appropriate people an open look at the end of games.

Brett Pill - Lord of the double.

by malarky on Nov 11, 2008 9:44 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Rudy’s unlike anyone Brandon’s ever played with. I think he’s still getting used to him. He’ll find him more often when they are more familiar with each other’s game. Remember, they play at completely different speeds…they have to adjust to each other.

by fart on Nov 11, 2008 9:57 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Rude D

I too have noticed all of the isos that Brandon had lastnight. It’s hard for me to complain about it when the Blazers won, and scored 106 points against a team I think was holding opponents to under 90. Rudy is scoring 14 points per game and shooting 46% from behind the arc, and it seems as though nearly all of those points came from an assist. I’d say that Nate is utilizing him perfectly.

"I'd hate to be you if I were me." - Eddie (Barfly)

by NBAstard on Nov 11, 2008 10:42 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

I been ragging on this for the past couple of days...

Team work is the essential ingredient to success on the court. Please be inclusive guys and good things will happen. Go Blazers!

by Lu on Nov 11, 2008 12:03 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

On track, right attack

Season is going just fine, especially considering the injuries. They need to play together to learn and grow. They are still just getting their legs. Doing quite well, and with plenty of areas likely to improve. I just want to see the full team play together for a dozen games. Timing takes time.

Rudy has stepped in as a vet, not a rookie. Shooters usually take how many years to get their groove at the NBA level? 3, 4? Martell? Not a knock; just a fact. RUDY! is way ahead of the curve because he fills multiple categories. Once settled a little in his role and familiar with the opposition, his passing and shooting exhibitions will be top flight. His defense looks plenty good at times – it will also improve.

Does that mean Rudy should be the number 1 option? No, for the basic reason that the smart posters above have noted: he plays better off-ball. They need to establish Brandon as demanding attention, and make sure Rudy gets to the open spot where Brandon can find him for a 15 foot spot-up or a cut to the rim. Kind of like establishing a running game so you can open up the passing lanes. Add Oden as another outlet and you’ll see Nate’s “point”.

I want to see the Blazers improve the quality of their shot attempts. That will help them down the stretch when the game is on the line. Don’t settle for jumpers. Attacking the basket makes good things happen.

Rudy has earned his run time, but I don’t want to see ANY Blazer play more than 34- 36 minutes a game, less if possible. Make it a ten man effort, run hard, Rudy will do just fine… (and yes, he does remind me of Reggie running endless curls)

For any doubters, I’ll say it again: this team can play with anyone in the league. They will need a season of games to mesh, but playoff time will be the big test. Once you determine position the number of wins doesn’t matter anymore. The 6 or 7 position would certainly be a help, but I don’t care the position as much as having a healthy squad that has built a good team chemistry and timing. I still see Second Round.

What’s wrong with Big 4? Oden, Roy, LMA, Rudy. They score 70; gets how many wins this season?

by Sashland on Nov 11, 2008 12:07 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Patience - it's only been 7 games

I’ve been very carefully watching how Rudy integrates into the offense with players other than Sergio.

The last two games Rudy and LMA are starting to connect. In the 4th Qtr last night Rudy had an assist to LMA on a pick and pop, and LMA had an assist on a Rudy 3-pointer when LMA could have put up a contested midrange jump shot (his bread and butter). They also had other good moments together last night and in the previous game. It was obvious that LMA started looking for Rudy after he was on the receiving end of several good feeds from Rudy. You can even see them starting to talk more on the floor.

Rudy fed Frye for 3 open jump shots last night, but unfortunately he missed all three.

Last night was also the first time I saw a screen (not a pick and pop) set for Rudy inside the 3 point line by LMA (or was it Frye?). Rudy took one step behind the screen but simply missed a good shot.

Roy and Rudy haven’t developed the chemistry together yet, and rarely talk to each other on the floor, but it will come. As someone said above, Roy needs to play with the ball and Rudy plays exceptionally well without the ball. It’s just a matter of time for them to put that together.

Rudy tried to create his own shot inside the 3-pt line 3 times last night, on one drive to the hoop and two spinning jump shots. On the drive to the hoop he had to finish over Howard, and on the other two moves he was way off balance and made poor looking shots. He has only made a couple of similar attempts in the previous 6 games. So let’s give him a little time to adjust to NBA caliber defenders before we decide he has no one-on-one game. Just consider the adjustments he has had to make just to shoot 3 point shots. He is shooting from a longer distance than in Europe, and shooting with a different ball. It’s would be no surprise if he has neglected his other moves for a few weeks while he has worked on 3 point shooting.

Lastly, even if Roy and Rudy haven’t developed their chemistry yet, Rudy is holding down the fort while Roy rests. In the first 7:02 minutes of the 4th Qtr last night, Rudy made 2 3-pt shots, 3 steals, drew an offensive foul on Jameer Nelson, and dished out 2 assists. We went from 1 behind to 12 ahead in those 7 minutes before Roy took over again to seal the win. Once they begin to dish back and forth to each other in the last 5 minutes of the game we will be able to win a lot of games in the 4th quarter.

by BlazerFanSince1970 on Nov 11, 2008 12:17 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I think a healthy Oden changes a lot...

Right now we have 2 players who can consistently get shots near the basket…Aldridge and Roy. Once Oden comes back, that gives us 3 players who can regularly get shots inside the paint. The more points we can get in the paint the better that bodes for our chances to make the playoffs. We will do this through the halfcourt offense and in transition. If Oden’s defensive presence can generate more fast break points that will help big time.

We cannot survive forever as a jump shooting team. We will need to get more points in the paint before the season is over if we are going to take the next step. I think McMillan gets this and it is why Roy and Aldridge are asked to do so much of the scoring. Because without those guys getting points in the paint, we become an almost exclusively jump shooting team.

by JasonT on Nov 11, 2008 12:24 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Oops I forgot Bayless too..

but he doesn’t play that much.

by JasonT on Nov 11, 2008 12:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent First Post

You see clearly; the Blazer offense was getting stagnant when Roy “took over” in the fourth quarters. Crisp ball movement will always beat one-man isolation plays, because no man can run as fast as a pass. Thanks for making a great point.

If you say "basically" at the beginning of a sentence, you probably also put ketchup on everything you eat.

by CosmoPlavix on Nov 11, 2008 1:12 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Man this was a tough post to read.

Be a student of the game for a while. Look at how well those “isos” work. Look at how they lead to tremendous scoring oppurtunities for the rest of the team. Ask yourself if this team would beat a normal Spanish team that plays the way you suggest? Maybe, just maybe, you’re whole perspective is skewed by a national preference.

No offense, or anything. I love having the international flavor, but this post smacked of preference for one player instead of winning.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Nov 11, 2008 1:23 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

And there's a significant difference between the folks who'd like to see more

player movement and the notion that Roy has to many isos and is “hogging the ball.”

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Nov 11, 2008 1:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

sorry,

but it is only a difference in how you wish to “package” your comment.

“Hogging the ball” is just an undiplomatic way of saying Brandon plays out of a half court set and likes to slow things down.

The thing is, guys are not going to continue to move around, if the ball doesn’t move around.

by Blazin' on Nov 11, 2008 1:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree.

If they don’t, they’ll get benched for someone who will.

You make it sound as if the players resent Roy. He is the leader, and he’s doing what leaders need to do. Take over games.

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Nov 11, 2008 2:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

do I?

that is completely unintended. I am not considering the egos or feelings of the players at all…just the style of play.

When I say guys are not going to continue to move around, I am referring to the simple fact that an NBA player is going to conserve his energy and not make wasted effort.

I honestly think the Blazers will have success with the “grind it out” approach. I just think, with this roster, they can have more success if they free it up.

by Blazin' on Nov 11, 2008 2:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I can appreciate that.

I love fast, moving offense, too, and I scream at players to cut and what not all the time.

I think the risk is that Roy then becomes excluded from the offense.

He’s not much of a runner.

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Nov 11, 2008 2:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

and that’s why this is an interesting discussion….which Blazers are we gonna see in 3 months? Something somewhere in between?

by Blazin' on Nov 11, 2008 2:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

They won't get benched for not moving around

because the play doesn’t call for them to move around. When we are run iso plays for Roy, the other players aren’t supposed to move around that much, they are supposed to spot up on the perimeter and stay out of Roy’s way.

by trk on Nov 11, 2008 3:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Are those isos really working that well?

So far, we have been scoring 110.5 points per 100 possessions when Brandon Roy is on the court, and 117.7 points per 100 possessions when Roy is off the court. Of course Roy is often playing against better defenders then we are playing against when he is not in the game, and it is still early in the season so the sample sizes are small. Still, when your team does worse offensively with your premier offensive player in the game that is usually a sign that said player isn’t being used as efficiently as he could be.

Running isos for Roy once in a while when he has some kind of a match up advantage, or when we don’t have enough time left on the shot clock to set up a more complicated play = good strategy.

Running isos for Roy when he has Ron Artest guarding him and a lot of time left on the shot clock = bad strategy.

by trk on Nov 11, 2008 3:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The isos really are working that well.

Our second unit is leaps and bounds better than most NBA second units. That’s why they appear to be so much more effective per that stat, cuz they just trounce the 2nd tier players of other teams. That stat then doesn’t indicate much in this instance… only that our bench is DEEEEEEP. The fact that Roy is playing against the best defenders and still is so effective is proof that the isos work as well as they do.

It’s been said before (by me, at least) that this Blazer squad has a legit 10 guys (maybe more now with Batum’s play) that can start on NBA teams. Advantage Blazers.

When other teams rotate out their best players (and likely best defenders) our “other” starters are still in.

I don’t think going to Roy when he’s got that pitbull Artest on him is a bankable strategy for 48 minutes mind you, but I do think he is being used to near-maximum efficiency. He’s not a runner. He’s never displayed that fast game we all crave. It isn’t the sexiest basketball to witness. But it is most certainly effective.

"When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep -- not screaming, like the passengers in his car"

by you'vegottomakeyourfreethrows on Nov 11, 2008 3:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't have to say that i was spanish.

As i said, if i criticize Roy is because I think the offense could be much better. Isos are good but done during a certain time of the game, not for 36 min (when Roy is in). I’m not bashing Roy, just trying to make a constructive critique which has something to do with Rudy… because he adds something different (movement without the ball).

Don’t labl me as a “Spanish biased fan” th x

by Kartemax on Nov 11, 2008 1:34 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

When Oden gets up and running

there will be less Brandon ISOs. Don’t worry.

These guys are still learning each other, and early in the season, the tendancy is to go to the thing you know, go for the tried and true method.

Once Oden gets in there, he will create space for LMA and Rudy to spot up and do other things. He will also create opportunities for Rudy to get assists by passing to Oden.

This team is trying to win every single game, so don’t blame them for playing it “safe” and leaning heavily on Brandon at the start of the season when they are still getting to know each other on the court.

You may be right about needing less Roy ISOs, but if these guys try to implement a new offense immediately, there is going to be a learning curve and it will result in turnovers and possibly lost games. Don’t forget that a lot of NBA players don’t have “team ball” experience, so don’t expect Travis to be able to play a game that is amenable to Rudy.

Otherwise, chug some Sangria, take a siesta and settle down for a great season! Don’t worry.

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 11, 2008 6:57 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

+1

Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16

by amlmart1 on Nov 11, 2008 11:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We're all fans here

Which means we are accomplishing…..what again?

Oh right, making brilliant opinions that filter their way up through the media to the actual chain of command, where they arrive at KP’s inbox just in time to make a pivotal move to ensure a triumphal playoff run.

Well, I guess, it’s possible. More likely we are expressing our hope for this team to be as good as possible. And pointing out things that we think will prevent the team from getting there.

Strange to me that criticism is interpreted as attack, and questioning tactics is interpreted as disloyalty.

But then again, there has been a lot of strangeness these last 8 years….

by Blazin' on Nov 11, 2008 1:56 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Oh right, making brilliant opinions that filter their way up through the media to the actual chain of command, where they arrive at KP’s inbox just in time to make a pivotal move to ensure a triumphal playoff run.

Sort of like that Draft the Stache campaign, right?

"I believe in [Joel]. I just love the way he plays." - Nate McMillan

by jamon51 on Nov 11, 2008 6:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly.

If only we had gotten Morrison!

by Blazin' on Nov 11, 2008 6:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Clearly

YOu are clearly a biased spanish fan, so that is the lable you get. You care more about Rudy than the team, and that is how your oppinon’s are born, The Fact is Rudy can’t hold Brandon Roy’s Jock Strap!! If you asked every GM in the league who’m they would rather have, you would here the same name out of all of there mouths, without hesitation. Brandon Roy, don’t bring a weak argument like that in here again. I don’t mind that you have a man crush on Rudy, I think he is great! But don’t bring hate against ROYBOT, he is by far the best player on the team.

This is Jack burton from the PorkChop Express and I'm talkin to whoever's out there.....

by Jack Burton on Nov 11, 2008 3:51 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I think the one that has a man crush on someone is you with Roy.

It’s incredible that u cannot take a critique about Roy’s game, he’s not perfect, neither is Rudy. Plz stop talking crap trying to change what i say. I’m not bashing him.

by Kartemax on Nov 11, 2008 4:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You guys are hilarious. WOW

People were taken aback by your directness and language (WTF?) in your original post. They also questioned the theory of changing the offense drastrically for Rudy… I think that’s a good idea, but it’s going to take time.

So people overreated. Then you got all defensive.

It’s really quite pathetic that Blazer fans (and purported Blazers fans who really only like certain players— OK, OK, just joking) that jump all over each other for this type of thing.

I don’t condone posts like Jack Burton’s, but I also think you should sort of expect it based on your original post.

by Bust a Bucket on Nov 11, 2008 7:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't like giving Roy the ball at the defensive foul line

and have him go down court and see what he can pull off one on one just because it’s the fourth quarter. That happens alot. A real lot. He forced several shots the other night, several with 14 seconds or so left on the 24 while the rest of the team stood around and watched. If the Roy vs the whole other team strategy works so well, let’s just do it for the whole game. Then we can get a huge lead, and maybe then let the rest of the team participate

When you are running an offense with 8-9 guys and it has worked well all game and given you a nice lead, why change that for the last 10 minutes? It is immensely predictable BTW and I would say seemingly unnecessary in games (like this last one) where a well rounded diverse offense was doing just fine. I would agree in a tie game, last possession — iso with your clutch guy…but six possessions in a row when you have the lead? How many of these is he really converting? and at what cost — to his body for example? And to the very style of play that gave you the advantage in the first place?

by LetsBlaze on Nov 11, 2008 4:07 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

it's pretty basic...

I see where you are coming from, but you have to realize the situation. In the last 5-7 minutes of a basketball game EVERYTHING and EVERYBODY tightens up. Each defense pushes much harder, and everybody is pressing just a little too much on offense. These are the natural tendencies in a game. So, you go to your best player at the end of the game. You let him work the offense because he’s got the best skills and the calmest demeanor on the team.

The game completely changes at the end. It’s not the same as the middle of the 2nd quarter where everybody is lose and they still have their legs about them, and the pressure is off to dig out a win.

All great coaches know they have to go to their best player in the end.

by mcmillion on Nov 12, 2008 12:35 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If no one is given the opportunity to participate

in these pressure, or percieved pressure situations, then they will never develop the discipline to perform in the end game mode, and it will re-enforce a sense of no-confidence which will then come back and haunt us at times when Roy is having a spasm and needs to sit for a minute…or just can’t beat the triple team

If he has the ability to breakdown offenses at will, lets make that happen 3 or 4 times EACH quarter…It is an illusion that end game points count more…they seem to add ALL of them up…just like wins during a season..

It also lends an air of desperation to the final minutes of a game when it might not be necessary. The fourth quarter, with a team this deep, is a time to exploit ALL the advantages that come with having young players that can all contribute — having Rudy run in circle and exhaust the defense has the added advantage of keeping the opponents tired on the offensive end as well…by giving their D a chance to rest and watch and wait fo Roy to make his move, it gives them a chance to catch their breath, making our job harder on the other side of the floor

Even if plays were set to get Roy the ball with 12 seconds left on the 24 — in other words, when you have the lead, try a play or 2 that might lead to a high percentage shot BEFORE settling for the Roy vs other team scenario..we gave Orl a couple of possesions at the end that they wouldn’t have had if we’d used the shot clock more effectively.

It’s great that Roy CAN perform so well in these 1 on 5 situations — people forget though that all NBAers usta be heroes SOMEwhere..mighta not been the case since high school, but it’s in there make-up…and showing confidence in them in non-desperate situations sets them up to perform under the real pressure that may come later..

Opposing teams should have to wonder how to defend us in the last few minutes rather than know to collapse on Roy period…

by LetsBlaze on Nov 12, 2008 4:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I totally agree

All those isolation plays ran for Michael Jordan in the 90’s were also a horrible idea. Too bad they never won any titles by doing doing that consistently at the end of hotly contested playoff games.

Seriously, you think Roy is “hogging the ball”? Did it occur to you that:

a) He is by FAR our best individual offensive player. Rudy and LMA are amazing and GO has tremendous potential but it’s still not even close. It makes SENSE to run isolation plays for your best one-on-one player at least some of the time, especially when he’s a phenomenal passer/playmaker like Roy is.

b) He is doing exactly what it takes for our team to win basketball games, and exactly what the coach is telling him to do. It’s not like he’s calling off set plays to run iso’s out of selfishness. If anything, Roy isn’t selfish ENOUGH, and I wish he would be more often.

If you have issues with McMillan’s offensive plan, then welcome to the club. I too believe that we run too many iso’s, that our offense is horribly predictable, that LaMarcus shoots outside too much, and that we are far more dynamic with our second unit, as do a number of people on this site.

But to say that Roy is hogging the ball, is in any way responsible for our offensive woes, or is somehow prejudiced in who he creates shots for, is just spreading propaganda.

Now go back to enjoying the greatest country on Earth. I’d give my right arm to be in Madrid right now instead of hacking away at this computer in Oregon.

"Life is a meaningless sequence of events in between Blazer championships"

by broggerboy19 on Nov 11, 2008 10:42 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

You got it

I do not like their offense and I’ve stated my opinion several times….I think there are many basketball fans that feel the same way, as you said… (note I said basketball fans and not Blazer fans)….lots of Blazer fans let blind love cloud their views, somewhat……and they become more bias than Kartemax…Roy doesn’t want to “hog the ball” and is only doing what the coaches want….
         I’d be willing to bet that Roy is not totally enamored with his role, as well………..It has to be both mentally <——-(which he seems to handle well) and physically exhausting……..when he has to start the offense, it is removing him from a more natural player position to which he can be much more effective….There is no doubt in my mind, he knows that….you can almost see it in his face…..
     PS. I agree with everything you said except the part about the greatest country on earth….But then this is where I become blind/bias (never been to Spain) and become quite satisfied with where I’m at now…(but I am nestled in the woods, between Portland and the coast)

by 67 on Nov 12, 2008 10:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

hate the offense?

wasn’t there another post where we were the fifth best team or something on offense and we actually sucked it up on defense? (last year, not this year)

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 12:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

he sorta does have a point

we usually use more isos in the 4th quarter…usually the same time we have been blowing our leads lately.

Honor Terry Porter

by Philthyanimal on Nov 12, 2008 12:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

i agree there's value in the dicussion

but I also find it ironic that Nate sucks at defense and we’re a top five offensive team.

Probably something that is only funny in my head because the context is needed and then my sense of humor, and then pretty girls in short skirts. It makes everything better.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 1:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

its definitely ironic

for a coach to preach defense and to dole out minutes to pgs primarily bc of defense, yet our team sucks at it. as much as i criticize nate, he is a young coach just like our team is young…i just hope as our team grows, nate learns to be a bit more open minded as well.

Honor Terry Porter

by Philthyanimal on Nov 12, 2008 1:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

haha...

Now you know who NOT to speak bad about in this forum, or on any other Blazer forum! You located the right button.

I think Roy carries the same air of invincibility with fans in Portland as Rudy does with fans in Spain. Portland is watching as Roy dominates and puts up one clutch performance after another… all other players are simply background in Roy’s world. From Spain, you are watching Rudy’s every step… you know his game much better than any Portland fan and you’re wondering why he’s not scoring 20+ a game like he did as a virtual hero in his home country with the ACB league. Completely understandable.

Rudy is playing GREAT… and he has been a very instrumental player in Portland’s young season so far. They’d be 2-5 without Rudy… guaranteed. Also, Roy has played GREAT… and he’s the MVP of this team. Without Roy, nothing happens for Portland. I will respectfully disagree that he does not involve his teammates… BRoy often leads the team in assists, and he is always looking to create for others on the floor. I believe Roy to be one of the best team players in the league… they don’t get much more unselfish than Brandon Roy. In fact… I often feel like he doesn’t shoot or look for his own shot enough.

I give you much props for coming in with a bold post like that on your first attempt. Although, I don’t know that you actually realized how bold of a post it was in the first place! This is the same if you were to go into a Cleveland forum and criticize Lebron James. That’s how highly Portland fans hold Brandon Roy.

by mcmillion on Nov 12, 2008 12:24 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

but lebron DOES suck... why would it be bad to say so?

i don’t get it.

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 12:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with the post

Too many isos, one on one play. Think back to the Blazers of 1977 when they won the championship, that was TEAM basketball. Lots of movement and passing, that is what I would like this Blazer team to do more of.

by blazerbill on Nov 12, 2008 8:53 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the perspective of this post

I’ve greatly enjoyed the conversation that has come from it by others.

Welcome to BE!

We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 10:22 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Isos, hogging, slowing things down:

None of those things are fun to watch all the time. Run and gun is great to watch. Run and gun is usually successful when the opposing team is not inspired to play to their fullest potential. To stop it, the defense has to get back quickly to stop the initial surge and set up its half court defence. Some teams rely on the run and gun so much their half court offence suffers. This is why Brandon Roy is so valuable. His control game can break down a half court defense. Without the ability to break down a inspired, well practiced, professional half court defense a teams success is severely limited.

I could be wrong now. But I don't think so!

by Kampeska on Nov 12, 2008 11:16 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

The reason ironically that Roy has the ball in his hands so much is because

otherwise we become a one dimensional team on offense. We have 2 (now 3 with Oden returning) rotation players who can get their shot on a regular basis inside the paint…that would be Roy and Aldridge. If Roy and Aldridge (and now Oden) do not score in the paint, then we become an exclusively jump shooting team. We are not going to win many games if 90% of our shots are from outside 15 feet. Nate gets this. That is why Roy handles the ball so much, and Aldridge is force fed the ball into the post so often. Shots in the paint are typically higher percentage and also get the other team in foul trouble. Without Roy and Aldridge scoring in the paint, we become one dimensional and our chances of winning are greatly diminshed.

by JasonT on Nov 12, 2008 1:08 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Not trying to argue

but we get very few points in the paint…except we have been getting a few more of late from offensive rebounds( but not much out of our offensive sets)……….when Aldridge gets the ball on pick and rolls , it’s a pick and pop instead….(meaning, instead of rolling to the hoop, he pops out for a jumper) …we may get more points in the paint with Oden, but that’s kinda hard to do when you don’t play…..So right now we are still a jump shooting team with 2 of our 3 options…..So now you are down to a fractional 2 option team….unless you count Outlaw’s jumpers as another option….
     Roy is the guy, but he’s being asked to both start the offense and then run the plays either through himself or Aldridge…he can’t do it all and besides that, opposing teams can overplay this and cause the offensive play to be much less effective(we overwork ourselves by not getting the easy hoops) Much of the easy hoops actually come from good defense, which we are also struggling with……….
 To be more effective offensively, we need to have an inside penetrating/distributing point guard to start the offense and thus allow Roy to become the 2nd offensive link to the rest of the team(because the other teams know they have to always be wary of Roy and it can open up jumpers and backdoor cuts/slashing to the hoop,lobs, etc…..But the offense can’t stop when the ball gets into Roy’s hands ….which it seems to do because it so happens this is about 75% of what we do, and often the other players are not involved in finishing the play (hopefully to get the best shot available)…We have been too content to settle for what the defense gives us (which is fine if we can adequately take advantage of it, but generally the old rule will always kick in at some point….live by the jump shot….die by the jump shot) and sometimes we die by it……..we need to get a better balance of plays together to get some easy hoops/points in the paint) and outside scoring….then it takes a lot of pressure off Roy to be be 75 % of our offensive scheme…..
   Injuries have forced us to change what we may normally be doing this year, but more flexibility in the flow of the offense always gets more people involved and contributing….Nate has said; We will be a very flexible team…..but hasn’t shown this much out on the court……Rudy gives them a whole list of new options, and they would be foolish not to use them…..We may lose more immediate games, in adjusting our offensive style, but It will pay us dividends down the road……Nov.-Dec is the time to bite the bullet and get er done

by 67 on Nov 12, 2008 4:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you that we do not get enough points in the paint...

but imagine if you took away the inside points Roy and Aldridge added to this team? We would have 8 points in the paint per game…probably all off of Joel’s offensive rebounds. Unless you see other guys on the team capable of getting their shot off in the paint on a regular basis?

Most likely Oden will help increase our points in the paint…but as McMillan indicated today, Oden is going to work his way into the offense….which doesn’t sound like he is going to be a focal point right away.

by JasonT on Nov 12, 2008 4:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

After watching last nights game

I saw great improvement in points in the paint….We may be getting better, but we need more consistency in all our play to keep me convinced we are making strides…the contributions of Roy and LA, in the paint are essential, but many of these have been contested and often one on one……and so these are hard fought points…… (even though they do get to the free throw line)…They need to get some easy ones where players are not continually taking their heads off (it will eventually take a toll on their health)………….
    Oden will not be a major part of this offense (at least for awhile)…He has a long way to go, and they shouldn’t force too much of their offense on him yet…..He still looks slow, and cumbersome out there and has no jump in his step, so to speak…..he also is missing some basic fundamentals (he does not have a lot of high level basketball experience)…..

by 67 on Nov 13, 2008 12:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Now do u think that should we play different?

Outlaw taking in the 4th quarter tought shots, missing a lot of them, and Rudy is clutch as anybody. In the beggining of the forth quarter it happened what has happened in almost all the games, portland gets an advantage playing with movement, why don’t we keep playing like that? We won because they didn’t put in the basket most of their shots in the fourth quarter… IMO

by Kartemax on Nov 12, 2008 7:42 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

we definitely need to keep that awesome movement up

the team is young though. The blazers, AGAIN, have a brand new team. Let’s give them 20 games to gel.

Greg Oden, where posters happen.

by ratbastird on Nov 12, 2008 8:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The NBA game works best if you mix it up

Giving Roy a lot of shots in previous games forces the defense to focus even more on him. Opportunities get created when teams defense adjusts to the star. I think that we will see better ball movement, but sometimes Roy will just take it to keep the defense focusing on him.

Boycott Rose Garden Concessions!!!
http://www.blazersedge.com/2008/11/8/657044/boycotting-rose-garden-con

by idoltime on Nov 12, 2008 11:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

good post

i officially retract everything negative i may have ever said about t o. yeah i agree roy an la and go for the moment’s o is like a 30 lb anchor, though effective. i think travis fits nicely with their game and gives another threat. as much as i like rudy i really think their style crimps his game though mabey theyll get used to it in the future. i look forward to martell coming back and seeing more sergio batum, martell and rudy out therein the 2nd unit. it will be a flying circus! and its probably good being able to play fast or slow.

by riccc_l on Nov 13, 2008 12:33 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Guess who has the highest PER for the Blazers? Hint, it isn't who you think.
Small
New B-Roy is the Old Kobe
The_dude_small
Stats 101: Whats The Deal? Let Me Explain...
Broyhope_small
First Rose Garden Game Redux...
Troll_stone_cropped_small
Nate in the land of the giants

Recent FanPosts

Copy_of_dcp_2180_small
09/10 junk
Meaccident_small
Most encouraging signs from the early season
Imported_photos_00004_small
Blazers Vs Timberwolves 10/8/09 Review
Small
How to consolidate?
Small
The Sched Ahead -- 11/02/09 Week Three, Primoris Annus Blazerium Dominatium
Small
Is Bynum the New Oden
Small
Brandon (old or new) is NOT Kobe (old or new) w/Poll
1-5-2009_007_small
NBA League Pass Blazer feeds???
Small
Pritchard must prune this roster

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

marty's buzzer beating dunk
Brandon Roy Wallpaper
Chad Ford (Insider): Travis Outlaw "Probably Won't Be Re-Signed"
Manu catches a bat during game. live coverage

ps
check out blair at the begining of video he freaks like a girl
Start Miller

Recent FanShots

So Bayless and T.I. are related right??
This chick will bring the toughness that the Blazers need to stop the other teams best players. Sign her KP!!!!
Rudy openly expresses disgruntlement
Charlie Rosen critiques the Blazers
McMillan said the key to having success on the road comes down to one...
NBA Top 10 From Last Night
I hope to see a LOT more of this during the season...nothing better than seeing Oden get block of the night.
Jaynes Weighs in on Blake / Miller / Roy
Viva la 3-Guard! T-Wolves Recap, at Loaded Orygun
Club Level tickets for sale tonight

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm