Blazer's Edge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Judge Blocks Williams' Suspensions from the Vikings Bar-right-arrows



travis outlaw

ok hear me out i was listening to the msp this morning and they were saying how travis is a one trick pony and after listening to what they had to say and seeing him play tonight i agree i think we should package him with rlec and get what we need most srry if i mad any one angry or upset that i posted this now insted of later in the season i just wanted to put this out there to what kind of reaction it would get   

2 recs | Comment 113 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Someone needs to teach him

how to catch and shoot. No matter how wide open he is, he ALWAYS takes a couple of dribbles before taking a shot. His offense comes independent of the teams offense. He was great on last years team because we needed guys like that. With the talent we have now, we don’t need a black hole type of player. I’d love to explore trade possibilities.

by as11osu on Oct 8, 2008 9:56 PM PDT   0 recs

ehh

its 2 preseason games…just relax. his ability to create his own shot is still something that this team can use. if we were gonna trade him it woulda been in the off season when his stock would have been at an all time high.

by Philthyanimal on Oct 9, 2008 12:07 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

He definitely will need time to find into the role of a starting small forward

Today, he was no help. No team leader. On the contrary, he pulled the other guys down with some wild jumpers instead of trying to create something useful, making them also more nervous. Today, Batum > Outlaw. Over the course of a season, of course he is not ready yet. And he was not the only one who looked less than stellar in that game. Same for Bayless, Joel, …

But yeah, my money is on an upgrade at SF at the deadline or in the off-season.

Odenied: If you're given lemmings—make lemming-ade (Bow4Meow)

by Norsktroll on Oct 8, 2008 9:59 PM PDT   0 recs

You guys are a joke, quit overreacting off 1 pre-season game

Outlaw is one of our best players, our best athlete, is young and very cheap.
 Every once in a while he just doesn’t bring it and has a bad night and tonight was that.

It’s the freaking pre-season — quit being irrational and judge him by his body of work and not just tonight.

by LOOSH on Oct 8, 2008 10:03 PM PDT   0 recs

Can "No better then fifth best" really be considered "One of our best players"?

I mean, Oden, Rudy, Roy, and Aldridge are all better then him at the very least. I really can’t call someone in the 66th percentile of “Best player on the team” one of our best players.

54!

by joof on Oct 8, 2008 11:23 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

No better than 5th best...

… usually means he’s a starter.

And that’s 33rd pecentile. Check your math.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Oct 9, 2008 7:11 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

haha

timg56 1
joof 0

by In Walks Rudy on Oct 9, 2008 7:14 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I didn't mean to "score" on someone.

I do have the habit of being abrupt. Maybe it’s because of what happened as a child. My dad used to check my math homework (all my homework really). I always did math in pencil because I could then erase mistakes without having to recopy the whole thing over. My dad would run down the problems and would mark the ones incorrect with an x – in ink. Even if I only had a single answer wrong out of 15 or 20, I’d have to do the whole thing over.

(He does crossword puzzles in ink too. )

One of the lesson learned – get it right the first time.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Oct 9, 2008 9:56 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

That's not cool

Who cares if your homework is wrong? America only cares about tests.

Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision

by tominhawaii on Oct 9, 2008 2:09 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Sorry to burst your bubble

Being 5th out of 15 (if that’s truly the case) makes Travis in the 66th percentile.
That means he is better than 66% of the whole team.

But hey, I’m no math teacher, oh wait, yes I am.

by BlazerHomer on Oct 9, 2008 9:58 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I stand corrected.

But then math was never by best subject. I had to get a tutor to help me with the calculus in Atmospheric Physics.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Oct 9, 2008 12:35 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

huh?

5/15 = .333

Its takes “5” to make up the .333 as in 5 players out of our 15 are in the .333

Travis is top 5. Traivs is in the .333

Travis is better than 66% of the team because he is part of the 33%.

timg56 was right. Go back to school teacher.

by In Walks Rudy on Oct 9, 2008 1:53 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

one shouldn't be so defiant when one is wrong.

but in statistical evalutions, such as in standardized testing, a person is always put in the percentile that they are ABOVE. i.e. if your kid is the top 20% of math students in the state on a test, then the test results say he or she is in the 80th percentile. The original user of the "66th percentile’ argument had it correct, as did BlazerHomer

Rule #1 of nitpicking is to get it right.

by douglast on Oct 9, 2008 2:02 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

furthermore

If we accept the premise that Travis is in the top 5 of 15 players on the Blazer roster, than you could said either:

“Travis is in the 66th percentile of top Blazer players”
OR
“Travis is in the top 33% of Blazers players”
OR
“Travis is in the top 1/3 of Blazer players”

These statements are essentially equivalent.

Rule #1 of nitpicking is to get it right.

by douglast on Oct 9, 2008 2:08 PM PDT to parent up   1 recs

thank you

The so-called rational people on this site always let their ego undermine what they say…Most of the time I’m not smart enough to argue, but I also don’t want to get into a battle over what’s rational and what (they) consider is not….Everyone has opinions and they don’t need them to be rationalized by people who don’t have the qualifications…

by 67 on Oct 9, 2008 2:23 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

hmm, makes sense

Sorry BlazerHomer! Add lack of knowledge regarding how to phrase statistical percentages concerning the rating of Travis Outlaw to the long list of my faults. “Foot in Mouth” being at the top of the list..

by In Walks Rudy on Oct 9, 2008 5:51 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

66th percentile Indeed

As in Greg Oden is in the 99th percentile for height amongst all man-children.

by everett on Oct 9, 2008 2:09 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Thanks for the support - but I was wrong.

BlazerHomer is correct with his usage of the term percentile. If you finish in the 90th percentile on the SAT’s you are among the highest scoring 10% of students who took the test.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Oct 9, 2008 3:00 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I think that's what they're doing.

A rational assessment of his talents leads to the conclusion that he doesn’t quite fit in. An irrational love of the dude (I love him too) leads you to ignore those conclusions. Check and Mate!!!!

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Oct 9, 2008 9:36 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

finally someone put this in the right perspective

And (I’m no math whiz either) ….But using it to evaluate talent (and team worth) makes little sense at all……No matter how you do the math, to make your point fit

by 67 on Oct 9, 2008 2:07 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

#25

Man I love tongue tacos - Mortimer
Only thing better is Trout on a stick roasted over an open fire - annthefan
I have a pic like that of my dog - tominhawaii

by Outlaw is Rejector on Oct 8, 2008 10:05 PM PDT   0 recs

fit

Outlaw is a good player without a doubt. Clearly tonight was an off night.

However, I think there is room for some mild concern at this point. An unemotional look at the facts shows that he is below average at passing, rebounding, man on man defense, driving, and man on man defense. he is above average at creating his own pull up jump shot in traffic. He is essentially an offensive black hole. For a guy with his athleticism, disproportionally few of his buckets come at the rim.

Outlaw has a lot of talent. he could likely score 20 points a game on a lottery team. but we aren’t a lottery team, and we have a lot of other guys. What we need to see from Outlaw the first 40 games this year is how he FITS into the rest of this team. How does he fit into a starting lineup when he goes from being the #1 option to being the #4 option and a guy who will get a lot of swing passes for spot up jump shots. How will he fit into a 2nd unit that appears to be very energetic and focused on ball and player movement. I’m not saying he can’t fit into either of those units, but we haven’t seen that kind of game from Outlaw yet. I say he’s got 40 games to show us.

Rule #1 of nitpicking is to get it right.

by douglast on Oct 8, 2008 10:14 PM PDT   2 recs

I absolutely hate Travis' game

he can’t dribble
he can’t pass
he loses track of his man
he shots two pointers with his toes on the line

—-

Despite all this, I would only move him if the trade was clearly in our favor. He’s drastically improved in the last couple years. He is an amazing athlete and developed into a very solid shooter and scorer last year. He’s very valuable because he can create his own shot better than anyone on the team other than Roy (at least last year, we’ll see if Rudy or Bayless or someone passes him).

One game is one game. Its not reason for concern.

Boomshakalaka

by jksnake99 on Oct 8, 2008 10:18 PM PDT   0 recs

Another analysis based on one game

I love Portland, not just the Trailblazers, but also the city. At the same time, Blazer fans (myself included sometimes) are nuts. Talking about trading Outlaw after a bad preseason game? Seriously? There’s no way we get anybody that fits our system better or makes us better now or in the future than Outlaw. All of this overreaction leads me to one conclusion:

Portland needs a girlfriend.

Seriously. Call that snooty Salem chick, or maybe slum it up with Kelso. Whatever it takes, just get out of your own head, Portland.

Travis Outlaw is an alien, but in a good way.

by Clevelander among roses on Oct 8, 2008 10:25 PM PDT   1 recs

+1!

Although slumming it up with Kelso is what begat La Center and Woodland, so be sure to use protection or we could end up with a little Kalama… oops.

by FlyingOutlaw on Oct 9, 2008 1:15 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

+1 to your +1

that really did make me laugh

by In Walks Rudy on Oct 9, 2008 6:23 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

we've been debating trading Outlaw

since the beginning of the summer. And what he’s shown in the pre-season games is pretty much what he does in the regular season too. I think his fourth quarter heroics last season elevated him in everyone’s mind, probably disproportionate to his actual ability. I think douglast and jksnake99 pretty much have it right.

by DrivetheLane on Oct 9, 2008 7:58 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

He wasn't talking about 1 game, he was talking about his style of play

not sure if you noticed that or not. Maybe Portland’s the guy you think is a jerk because he always thinks he’s right, you disagree, and then you hate him more when you find out he’s right.

Man, I need to get out of my own head. There’s a lot of room in here if someone wants to move in. I’ll consider trades. Ocean view, hot water, plenty of heat, and rose colored vision. Below market rent. Lease to own considered.

I'm a really really ridiculously good looking orange mocha frappaccino drinking manhammer sandwich

by hobobob on Oct 9, 2008 9:43 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Not just one game.

There has been talk about getting rid of Travis the whole off-season. Travis has done nothing over the last two games besides reinforce already well established opinions regarding his general game.

There is a certain amount of love for Travis on this site, and people counter any criticism of Trout by saying, “#25,” like his number has anything to do with his value to the team.

Travis is incredibly athletic, and has been like able since we first saw him at a spindly 17. That being said, Travis has been largely over-rated based on one great shot. Yeah, I said it… one shot.

 He is bait. Good bait.

by everett on Oct 8, 2008 10:41 PM PDT   0 recs

Hmmmmm !

      Perhaps. I think 3M is our long term answer at
SF, unless RLEC & ?

     COINCAST SUCKS !!!! GET A DEAL DONE, NOW !!
   WHY IS CHARTER COMM. OUR ONLY CABLE OPTION ??

It's GO time !

by walkoff41 on Oct 8, 2008 10:46 PM PDT   0 recs

because cable companies dont compete with each other.

by Blazerland on Oct 8, 2008 10:59 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

monopoly

utilities and cable companies are usually legal monopolies.

by Philthyanimal on Oct 9, 2008 12:09 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I've always been open to trading Outlaw

I think it is an overreaction for anyone to change their mind about Outlaw in one pre-season game. With that said, I have never been a big fan of Outlaw’s game. He is an inefficient scorer and a mediocre defender. Inefficient scorers will lose you more games than win them. For some reason, inefficient scorers are valued around the league, so if we can get a good asset coming back, I would be completely in favor of it.

People need to face this reality, Outlaw is a veteran in this league. His game is not going to evolve much from this point forward. Potential is no longer a word that should be associated with Outlaw.

BINGO, BANGO, BONGO

by blzrfan on Oct 8, 2008 10:48 PM PDT   0 recs

agreed

i was open to trading outlaw last year too. i figured with greg and rudy coming over, he’d sort of take a back seat this year compared to last. despite that, wanting to trade him because of poor play in 1 preseason game is a little drastic. remember last year when trout came to camp out of shape? maybe he just needs some time to get back in the swing of things.

last year he drove me crazy with his poor shot selection…yet he was successful for the most part. now he just looks like a fool with the crazy shot selection when its not falling. trout will get back to form by the seasons start i’m sure of it.

by Philthyanimal on Oct 9, 2008 12:12 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Looking for a place to chime in

So I’m sorry if it ended up here…..I have never been am Outlaw fan (or Webster for that matter)….Outlaws game has too many downsides that are important parts of basketball….he is outrageously athletic and that is the reason he is in the NBA…..So far the only reason
    If they are looking for Outlaw to win games for them at crunch time, we are in deep doo doo….
   This guy has an extremely low basketball IQ and this will always hurt his ability to get better and learn more about the game….He always takes them out of team play and is becoming the new black hole on this team (Randolph),,,unfortunately we are vested in him and trading him + others for quality does not look possible at this time….
    He is missing so many good basketball qualities that may not be teachable given his narrow mindset……he doesn’t even hustle, lacks instincts, and may be the poorest conditioned player on the team….he has only been good (not brilliant) in spots…. and if you put his play in the context of the team, it becomes a liability…..We no longer need him on this team…We have other better players…that should play over him….Look how the team played with Batum in the game….They were a team….
   One other thing…Outlaw never drives,slashes, or cuts to the hoop…its all jump shots…And the block he got in last nights game was funny…he whacks it strong out of bounds (no possession) and the only reason he was there to make the block, is because he completely lost his man….
   If the guy had went to college he may have learned something…teaching him the fundamentals in pro ball have proved futile……He just don’t get it …..and the way Nate is letting him try and play it out won’t help either…..he is lost out there and it show
   Other thoughts:
Batum is a player and will do more for this team in the long run than Outlaw and Web combined
Bayless is totally lost at point guard….Don’t see that this will be a position for him(except defensively) (How long can we wait to allow more time and not give those minutes to Sergio?) Roy and Rudy are also way better at getting the offense started
Rudy is just what this team needed….he compliments everything on the court

by 67 on Oct 9, 2008 10:17 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

HOLD UP!

it was just one game. please dont give him the jarrett jack treatment and cast him out of rip city after one poor shooting night.

i agree it was terrible performance but troutlaw, mr 4th quarter, is better than that. i think webster, frye, sergio, outlaw, ike, and a few others are always open for trading but please dont outcast outlaw just yet.

by Blazerland on Oct 8, 2008 10:59 PM PDT   0 recs

everyone outside of the big 3 (maybe big 4 + rudy?)

is open to trading IMO. Even trout, if the deal is right. We shouldnt be motivated to get anyone off our team however. Everyone is progressing and playing fine, including outlaw. I hate how people overreact after 1 bad game. If we are gonna trade him, its because we could get a better player. We should not trade him bc of an after reaction to 1 game however. Hell a preseason game at that.

by Philthyanimal on Oct 9, 2008 12:14 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Again...

One game. Travis is our 6th man, mr 4th quarter. I agree he looked horrible out there, but he also has a new role on the team as starting SF in place of Webster. Wait until a little later this season and see what happens. One pre-season game is not worth throwing out one of our best and mos loved players. Let this team come together and if someone is not fitting in, THEN we trade him.

by j-blaze on Oct 8, 2008 11:02 PM PDT   0 recs

I love me some Trout.

I would hate to see him go, just because of my blind love for everyone of this team, especially a personality so unique like his. That being said, I’m sure he will get shopped around with RLEC, just because his stock is high and he is a sexy player right now in the league. I’m sure KP knows not to dump him and give up on him after one bad PRESEASON game, but given his relatively high stock right now, the probability that Marty is going to improve ( assuming he recovers fully from his stress fx ), and Batum playing better than expected, I’ll bet Trout is more likely to be traded than most. However, I trust KP to make the right decision, and believe wholeheartedly that if we ship Trout, as painful as it would be, KP would be making a trade that is good for the team…also I have absolutely no say in the matter so I don’t have to worry.

by oden is GOD OF WAR on Oct 8, 2008 11:11 PM PDT   0 recs

trout trouble

I would agree about not judging Travis based on one night of poor shooting. But pay attention to what the posters are saying. The problems we saw tonight with Travis had to do with more than poor shooting. He floats outside the flow of the game both offensively and defensively. With Europeans, who are generally more team oriented, on the squad, Travis’ poor fundamentals will become more glaring.

I think Rudy will have that effect in general. To encourage team mindedness through cuts and movement and awareness. He has a rare feel for the game of basketball.

Travis will have to adapt or see his minutes diminish.

by Blazin' on Oct 9, 2008 12:06 AM PDT   0 recs

trout is still vital

he is clutch, and he can bring something to the table that most of our guys cant…the abilty to create their own shots. there will be times where this is useful (esp with Pryz in the lineup). i think trout may not be the man he was last year (partly bc he was so successful as a 4 in the 4th quarter) and the dynamic of the 2nd unit is slightly different now.

i wasnt impressed with trout in the kings game offensively…but he still got active in other parts of the game, areas where i felt he was weak in before. so i was happy to see him improve in those areas. he hasnt made m/any questionable errors related to his “lack” of bball iq so far this year too.

this year id love for trout to – maintain his weak side help defense, improve his man defense, pass the ball a bit more, and learn to catch and shoot. i’m not gonna knock on his shot selection, bc as we all know he can make a bucket even taking a horrible shot.

by Philthyanimal on Oct 9, 2008 12:20 AM PDT   0 recs

You can't do that

You can’t say that you’re not going to knock the guy for his shot selection, and then admit that he takes horrible shots. It just doesn’t make sense. Your point about him being among the only players on the team that can create their own shot, is no longer valid. Jerryd Bayless and Rudy Fernandez are both more than capable of getting the same shots that Outlaw can get. The only difference, at least in Rudy’s case, is that he’s better at making those shots, and plays within the offense.

I just think with our overall talent level, playing as a team on offense in our second unit will get us much higher quality shots than leaving things up to TO in isolation. He detracts from other players offense, and minimizes points per possession when he takes the show over. He also isn’t an elite defender, something he should be by this point. Despite all of this, I absolutely love watching the man play basketball. He’s an athletic freak, and makes plays you think are impossible. I found myself trying to be quiet around my friends tonight watching the game. Its so frustrating watching a guy with so much obvious talent, mismanage it like he does. Its not Nate’s fault either though. He taught Travis Outlaw how to be an effective second unit player on last years team, void of talent. Travis Outlaw in isolation was better than anything else we had. This year, that simply isn’t the case.

by as11osu on Oct 9, 2008 12:45 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Travis Outlaw in isolation was better than anything else we had

Assuming Brandon Roy was double-teamed or not in the ballgame

by two4larue on Oct 9, 2008 11:07 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

This is the problem

if Travis is our best isolation player then we should change our style…This is a team sport and we showed last night that isolation is not our best choice of plays….( If it is, then Nate will continue to lose points in my favor ….what was he working on? Outlaw’s offensive skill to pull the game out in the end even if he went 5 for 5, the team wasted 3 minutes of the game they could have been working on team flow and set plays).
    If he misses shots out of the flow of the game, then I could care less….He’s breaks the flow every time he gets the ball…it’s a jump shot or nothing.
   Did you see the flow of the game with Rudy and Batum in there….. it was fun to watch…. Travis can’t get into the flow because he is only in there to throw up jump shots….
    this team is changing with new players …now it has to change it’s style of play to move to the next step. players have to adjust and be able to play when other players are not in the game…..it’s called versatility …..every night other teams will look to stop what we do, and defending a player in isolation is easier than guarding the whole team…..Good teams can easily stop Travis…because he has a lot of weaknesses to take advantage of, and he did catch some teams off guard last year….The %’s that he will beat you and taking advantage of his weakness to offset any offense, he supplies, will always measure out by the end of the game

by 67 on Oct 9, 2008 1:31 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

crunch time offense

It is what it is, whether you like ball movement or not, what gets the job done at the end of the game is to have a superior player beat his man off the dribble (or post up) and either score, get fouled or hit a wide open shooter.

Roy can do those things, but…the opponent knows this, so they will attempt to take Brandon out of the play so it becomes necessary to have a 2nd player who will 1) not “run away from the ball” in pressure situations, and 2) has the ability to get his own shot off, especially when the offensive play breaks down.

There was a perfect example of this in the Memphis game last year, and it set Travis up to be the “go-to” guy in the Altanta game, later. In other games, Roy passed the ball to Outlaw who generally hit the open shot. That’s a “presense” you can’t teach.

Woody Allen actually wrote an article for SI back in the 79s about Earl Monroe that talked about this. Some players just have the abiltiy to not choke, and it has nothing to do with basketball IQ or intelligence. They just let it fly and don’t worry about the consequences.

I think Travis has value as this kind of player, but in the long run for the Blazers, the Roy/Oden/Rudy combo will make Outlaw “less necessary” than he was in ’07

by two4larue on Oct 9, 2008 3:49 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

yes this is where his value is

No argument there…But it is also where his value ends, and like you say we have other players that may make this team good enough to prevent needing a crunch time (and very one dimensional player like Outlaw) ….The scenario (that having the lead at the end of the game) will allow you to put more defensive players in the game or ones that can take care of the ball or can still score if necessary, out of the flow of the offense………His value is diminishing and I think you said that…..
     Right now, it is what we have and I would hope it would translate into something less desperate in the future play of this team,,,so I guess most people, that are commenting in this post, wonder if Outlaw is in the future…… or if this team is successful, will Outlaw be a major part of the success.
     

by 67 on Oct 9, 2008 5:31 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Yup

I totally agree. He does not have a basketball IQ. He only does a few things. I like him. But I really hope one of those few things he does includes gets us somebody who fits us better.

by begottenson on Oct 9, 2008 12:42 AM PDT   0 recs

Not a good night

I was at the game, and he looked really out of it. The crowd seemed to gasp when he went up for those sky jump shots. He still has tons of upside, but tonight was really a setback. I feel that Batum really made him look like he should be playing better after so many years in the league. He had some good rebounds though.

Ugggh, I really am not a Trout fan right now.

hmmmkay

by TylerM on Oct 9, 2008 12:46 AM PDT   0 recs

i was ready to scream with excitement

when rudy fed him the ball on a fast break i think it was, and trout just dunked the ball so violently that it just bounced off the rim. seeing him elevate like that had me anticipate the play being on sports center top 10…then i was just disappointed that he missed it.

by Philthyanimal on Oct 9, 2008 12:54 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

careful!

dont give him the jarett jack treatment though.

by Blazerland on Oct 9, 2008 6:15 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

"He still has tons of upside"

Really? What’s the upside? Jump higher, shoot more?

What skill sets does he have a realistic shot at developing other than jumping and shooting?

by raoulduke on Oct 9, 2008 3:09 PM PDT to parent up   0 recs

In one aspect Travis is like the anti-Roy: Shot selection

You very rarely see Roy take a bad shot. And when he gets the ball and decides to move, he usually moves into a better position. Travis is the exact opposite. Somehow he is able to shoot the ball quite effectively off the dribble but not when catching and shooting (only in the two corners a little bit). And somehow he often moves himself into a worse situation than just taking the shot he would have had when immediately going up, instead dribbling into three defenders and then going up for a fallaway jumper or something.

Odenied: If you're given lemmings—make lemming-ade (Bow4Meow)

by Norsktroll on Oct 9, 2008 4:56 AM PDT   0 recs

.

Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision

by tominhawaii on Oct 9, 2008 5:16 AM PDT   0 recs

its early

the good thing is that its happening in preseason and i doubt the coaching staff will let him just float around and take 16 foot jumpers all day.

rudy was able to find a slashing martell the first game and if the coaching staff can help outlaw get into that im sure trout has a little jump in him. :]

by Blazerland on Oct 9, 2008 6:14 AM PDT   0 recs

man it annoying posting b4 you're ready!

Travis clearly was having an off night, that is NOT reason to start talking about trading him. I’m more worried about him must standing around watching Rudy and Sergio run past him on every play. Can he even play with those two? They think and their bodies react; Travis thinks and five seconds later his body say’s “whaaaaaaaaa?”.

by In Walks Rudy on Oct 9, 2008 7:11 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Is that a compliment or a critique?

Odenied: If you're given lemmings—make lemming-ade (Bow4Meow)

by Norsktroll on Oct 9, 2008 8:08 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

i dunno if its just travis

but most of the people on the team was just standing around yesterday. there wasnt nearly as much off the ball movement as there was against the kings. nothing for our distributers to work with considering our jump shots werent falling.

by Philthyanimal on Oct 9, 2008 8:41 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

I really liked in the first pre-season game where Trout was like the 8th man off the bench. He kind of snuck up on the other team that way, plus it really illustrated how deep our 2nd unit is. For every night of 1-12 shooting there will be another where he’s 10-12, maybe?

by 50backflips on Oct 9, 2008 7:01 AM PDT   0 recs

Only the second game into the pre-season and we already have

trade talk.

Some people are priceless.

hakkaa päälle !

by timg56 on Oct 9, 2008 7:14 AM PDT   0 recs

what's wrong with that

I think that we all know what the goal is, we want to succeed. We now have some scary players, and all of a sudden Travis is looking pretty darn one dimentional. I think it’s very well within everyones rights to consider the possibilities of trading Travis, especially when we all know how big of a trading piece that would be with RLEC to get us another awesome baller. A lock down defender (which Travis is not) that knows how to distribute the ball (which Travis does not), someone like Shane Battier perhaps??? We don’t have that Bruce Bowen/Shane Battier type right now, and that is our missing piece. RLEC + Trout + some throw ins will obviously net that. We have the potential to get a lot acomplished this year, why not figure out a way to get the most done.

myspace.com/marktwainindians

by mark twain on Oct 9, 2008 7:31 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

Who would you get?

Battier is not going anywhere because Houston is making a run and Bowen is old.

Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision

by tominhawaii on Oct 9, 2008 7:44 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

They have artest now

Don’t you think that Battier is going to become a little less important. You give them RLEC and Travis, you make it work. It would have to be a crafty trade because RLEC is worth twice what Shane’s contract is worth. It would probably have to be some crazy 3 way trade, but you have to remember that Houston has a WAY SMALLER window than us, and that expiring contract would help them tremendously in getting a free agent next summer to help take them to the promise land (or at least give it the old college try)… T

myspace.com/marktwainindians

by mark twain on Oct 9, 2008 7:49 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

They got their free agent last summer

They are better with Artest and Battier than they would be with an expiring contract, a shoot first small forward, and change. Houston made its moves for a championship over the summer.

Blazers Edge has an alarmist vision

by tominhawaii on Oct 9, 2008 7:59 AM PDT to parent up   0 recs

The only reason our window is larger than others

is because we HAVE young players that are good. So quit trying to trade them away from old & moldy players.

by In Walks Rudy on Oct 9, 2008 8:02 AM PDT