Blazersedge Season Preview: The Final Chapter--Predictions
We come to the end of both our NBA and Blazers season preview with our predictions for the season. In a way I hate doing these. So much of sports talk is based on future prognostications. Nobody does it all that well. People usually only pay attention to the picks they got right. Yet everybody takes the picks so seriously. If you’ve paid attention closely you will have already seen that Blazersedge is not very big into predicting the future. I vastly prefer to observe and try to explain what IS rather than prattling on about my opinions of what will be. If we give you a future prediction--like certain players being more likely to be traded, players having inside tracks or long roads to playing time, or certain teams causing other teams problems—it’s on the best observable data we can see and usually has a basis in league history as well.
(Side note here: I suspect this is half of why people attribute motives to my writing such as bias or pessimism that are almost always off base. When I talk about what I see, I’m describing something that has happened and how that could affect what will happen if it doesn’t change. However I think people read that as me predicting what will happen…or more to the point, what I want to happen. Often that’s just not true. I never root for players or the team to do anything but succeed wildly. But I also feel compelled to describe accurately when things aren’t going right or when the odds of something good happening look long based on past experience.)
Despite all that, today we join the masses and take guesses as to what will transpire. I avow beforehand that if we turn out correct it’s mostly luck, so take this in the spirit it’s offered…mostly fun. (We’re a little more serious about the Blazers part though.)
In case you’re wondering, going into last season I had something like a four year track record of getting the Finals participants correct with the winner correct in three of those four years. Last year I intentionally decided to test my powers by going out on a limb. So I picked Dallas and Chicago to get to the Finals. Y’all saw how that worked out. This year we’ll try to be a bit less cavalier.
Here are the predictions for the playoffs. I have seeded them as the NBA will, with conference winners guaranteed no worse than the third seed.
Eastern Conference
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Round 1
Celtics def. Bulls
Magic def. Hawks
Pistons def. Raptors
Cavaliers def. 76’ers
Round 2
Celtics def. Cavaliers
Magic def. Pistons
Eastern Conference Finals
Celtics def. Magic
Western Conference
1 L.A. L*kers
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 Portland Trail Blazers
Round 1
L*kers def. Blazers
Hornets def. Mavericks
Rockets def. Spurs
Suns def. Jazz
Round 2
L*kers def. Rockets
Hornets def. Suns
Western Conference Finals
Hornets def. L*kers
NBA Finals
Celtics def. Hornets
There you go. There’s at least a realistic possibility of that coming true but it’s not the boring-as-paste L*kers-Celtics prediction which would cover my butt and let me claim I was an accurate genius. (Though the boring-as-paste prediction usually turns out to be the right one.)
As far as the Blazers go, I usually try to divorce my heart from the process and use a basic (no doubt flawed and certainly still subjective) metric to guesstimate wins. It goes like this:
You should win…
1 game out of 4 against teams that are vastly better than you.
2 games out of 5 against teams that are somewhat better than you.
1 game out of 2 against teams that are roughly equal to you.
3 games out of 5 against teams that are somewhat inferior to you.
3 games out of 4 against teams that are vastly inferior to you.
By my calculations, this would put the Blazers at 42 wins. Since we exceeded the metric last year, since the Blazers are somewhat of an unpredictable wildcard with their young and explosive talent, and since this is a Blazer site and we can say what we want I’m going to raise the total and say the Blazers net between 44-46 wins this season. Anywhere in that range will almost certainly be good for the 8th spot this year with the middle teams in the West in turmoil. Anything under 44 would be slightly disappointing. Anything over 46 should be considered excellent.
As far as awards, here you go:
Brandon Roy will be an All-Star again. Lamarcus Aldridge will get serious consideration but just fall short. Greg Oden will look good for a true center but they’ll stick so many power forwards in there as centers that he’ll be left out.
No Blazer will be in serious contention for Rookie of the Year past February or so. Greg Oden’s stats won’t be flashy enough and they’ll say he plays on a great team that allows him to do [insert whatever he does best here]. Rudy Fernandez will be among the best team players in his rookie class and make a few highlight reels but his value won’t show up clearest in the stat column either.
Greg Oden may get consideration for the All-NBA second defensive team.
Brandon Roy will be voted the most valuable Blazer.
Lamarcus Aldridge will be the team’s leading scorer. Greg Oden will be the team’s leading rebounder and shot blocker. Steve Blake will barely win the assist title unless he’s traded but several Blazers, including Sergio, will challenge him. Travis Outlaw will be the leading scorer off the bench but this may be his last year with that distinction. Rudy Fernandez will be considered the most inspirational Blazer (though that should be
We’ll see at least two Blazers traded before the deadline. Our 15th man may be waived to make that possible. The 2009-10 starting lineup will look different than this year’s, so enjoy this one while you have it.
There it is. Feel free to register your own predictions below about anything you want, as long as you’re willing to take them semi-non-seriously (which means having a sense of humor and not getting mad at other people who predict differently than you).
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
95
comments
Comments
Pessimistic, Dave
But that’s what I like about the site. You keep our expectations realistic. It makes the great things that happen even better.
by robrun2 on Oct 23, 2008 11:48 PM PDT 0 recs
In economics, there are two types of analysis
Normative and positive. Positive economic analysis is the study of what is. Normative analysis is, essentially, the study of what can be.
Dave, you are the epitome of a positive analyst, while Ben is more of a normative thinker. I think that is what makes Blazersedge such a great blog. It has a wonderful mix of analyzing the present and looking toward the future.
by Cablinasian on Oct 23, 2008 11:48 PM PDT 0 recs
Assume a perfect NBA league
(sorry, Economics joke)
by DonkeyShins on
Oct 24, 2008 7:56 AM PDT
up
0 recs
economics professor here
Positive economics is the study of what is or what could be (what are the objective outcomes), normative analysis is the study of what “ought to be” (what are the value judgements on the outcomes.)
I think we can all agree normatively. The Blazers ought to win the championship.
by keephopealive on
Oct 24, 2008 8:32 AM PDT
up
0 recs
+1
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Oct 24, 2008 8:44 AM PDT
up
0 recs
What's the economics term for
“what actually happens after irrational consumer behavior and the usual lying, cheating, and market distortions of the holders of capital is factored in”
by raoulduke on
Oct 25, 2008 4:04 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Can't be answered
Site rules.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Oct 25, 2008 4:06 PM PDT
up
0 recs
First word is cluster
…and it ain’t a Hoody’s dessert.
by DonkeyShins on
Oct 26, 2008 10:05 PM PDT
up
0 recs
behavioral analysis...
"It's not a joke -- it's not a game." — B-Rex
by timbo on
Oct 25, 2008 4:27 PM PDT
up
0 recs
seems simple enough
just factor in ignorance and greed
WWKPD?
Ambassador to the Miami Heat
by Magnum on
Oct 25, 2008 5:14 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I thought division winners
only got a top 4 seed for sure. I thought it was all division winners and the next best record in the top 4 seeds with the order being decided by best record.
Also, I think you should include a prediction for the opener and home opener. I mean, that’s what I’m most concerned about right now. I can’t wait for the season to start.
I’m going to go positive:
Blazers 105
L*kers 99
Blazers 92
Spurs 89
45 wins 7th seed
1-4 against Hornets in the first round
WWKPD?
Ambassador to the Miami Heat
by Magnum on Oct 23, 2008 11:53 PM PDT 0 recs
Kudos for courage
L@kers over Blazers is a tough nut but then in 76-77 it was all but certain the L@kers would sweep the young Blazers. Sweep it was but the other way around. Here is hoping we do play the fakers and by then we have gelled into a team who can defend the perimeter and score well also.
Celtics do not have the edge this year in my mind because the league was just not ready for them last year. They do look best on paper. Who will beat them? LeBron is the best player in the league. Orlando is certainly credible. Detroit may not be done – Coach Curry is my pick for darkhorse coach of the year in the East. Miami may rebound well this year and go from last to playoffs and they have possibly the second best player in the league in Wade.
when you’ve been in a dry land even a little dew looks inviting —Dave
"When you want to win a game, you have to teach. When you lose a game, you have to learn." - Tom Landry
by lee3022 on Oct 23, 2008 11:59 PM PDT 0 recs
I predict
the Blazers will start slow, finish strong, and really scare someone in the first round of the playoffs.
by jsmuc on Oct 24, 2008 12:08 AM PDT 1 recs
Hornets
a good pick for a lakers hater, but I will go with the lakers as I more indifferent to them (possibly making me less likely to love them in the future?) as I think Bynum will be able to take away some of Chandler lobs that make so much hay for the Hornets and are really only defendable by a few high jumping centers.
Life is exhausting when you are this stupid.
by jonestr on Oct 24, 2008 12:13 AM PDT 0 recs
52 wins
6th seed in the West. Lose in the first round in 6 games.
Oden averages 15/10/2 assists/2 blocks in 65 games
Trout falls to 15 minutes a game by season’s end
Team lets the RLEC expire and does not make substantial use of the 2009 cap space
Blake’s scoring average jumps to 11 PPG
Deron Williams beats out Brandon for the all-star team
Batum averages <5 PPG for the season
Bummer that we can’t delete our own posts if they don’t turn out… :)
by Engineering Problem on Oct 24, 2008 12:33 AM PDT 0 recs
I'm going to bookmark this just so I can come back and see who was the closest
WWKPD?
Ambassador to the Miami Heat
by Magnum on
Oct 24, 2008 12:36 AM PDT
up
0 recs
East Good, West Tougher to predict
I’ll be a little more optimistic… My big bet is that Utah will suffer more nagging injuries than the Blazers, and we will catch them to win the Northwest Division in the last week of the season… I also think Phoenix is going to fall farther and faster than Dave predicts…
So my rankings for the West playoffs look like this:
1 Fakers
2 New Orleans Hornets
3 Portland Trail Blazers
4 San Antonio Spurs
5 Utah Jazz
6 Houston Rockets
7 Dallas Mavericks
8 Phoenix Suns
Round 1
Fakers def. Suns
Hornets def. Mavericks
Blazers def. Rockets
Spurs def. Jazz
Round 2 – the BIG upset round:
Blazers def. Hornets
Spurs def. Fakers
Western Conference Finals
Blazers def. Spurs, making this town completely insane… And we’re all OK (especially an old Celts fan like me) losing to the two-time champs…
Roy is an All-Star, and so is LMA, on the second team… Unlike Dave though, I think the ROY is all about the Blazers this year, with Greg beating out Rudi for the honors…
KP makes 2-3 deals this year, mainly acquiring more draft picks, but we do get Shawn Marion for the stretch run when the Heat realize he won’t re-sign… Mainly because of impending free agency, Frye, Diogu and Travis are all gone by the deadline, and the big surprise is that Summer League MVP Jerryd Bayless is dealt to Miami as part of the Marion deal. In the off-season, KP deftly works the draft, deals, and free agency to land Baron Davis… The Blazers go into 2009 as the favorites to win the West, with an even more amazing lineup of:
1: Baron Davis, Steve Blake, Sergio
2: Brandon Roy, Rudi Fernandez
3: Shawn Marion, Martell Webster, and Batum
4: LMA,
5: Greg, Joel
And, two more first round picks this year, next year, and the year after that, so we keep continuing this dynasty!
by Visionary1 on Oct 24, 2008 12:44 AM PDT 1 recs
Geeze
I felt like a homer for predicting the Blazers winning the first 2 games.
WWKPD?
Ambassador to the Miami Heat
by Magnum on
Oct 24, 2008 12:48 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I think they are going to beat Los Angeles in opener.
I’m not as confident at predicting a win over the Spurs, but that’s because I believe betting against the Spurs is a losing proposition most of the time.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on
Oct 24, 2008 7:53 AM PDT
up
0 recs
You are probably right about the Spurs
However, on the plus side, eventually the Spurs will get old. And it’s really hard to find a Zimmer frame sized for Tim Duncan.
by DonkeyShins on
Oct 24, 2008 7:58 AM PDT
up
0 recs
We might win the division...
but we are not a 3 seed. Houston, San Antonio, New Orleans or Dallas will win their division and another one of these teams will be the 3 seed.
For some reason, I think Utah will have nagging injuries all year as well. Maybe b/c Booz and D-Will played all summer? Just a hunch.
Oden and LaMarcus and Roy, oh my!
by Quik_Baller on
Oct 24, 2008 9:04 AM PDT
up
0 recs
You were doing so well until the final.
Why stop there? Blazers over Celtics in seven tough, exciting games.
Baron will become a Blazer the day that Kobe and Shaq announce they will be singing and dancing together in the Barney movie, “Clap Your Hands for Love.”
"Personally, I'd rather give an elephant a prostate exam on Chili Day." --Dave on rooting for the Lakers or Celtics
by MiledAnimal on
Oct 24, 2008 9:19 AM PDT
up
0 recs
LOL! You are so very right about Baron being a Blazer
I would pay serious money to see
Kobe and Shaq announce they will be singing and dancing together in the Barney movie, "Clap Your Hands for Love."
Hilarious!
LMA - Let the breakout year begin!
LMA puts the POWER in Power Forward!
35:48 min, 9-16 FG, 6-7 FT, +14 2 Off, 6 Reb, 5 Ast, 1 TO, 4 Stl, 1 BS, 24 Pts - LMA vs Sac 10-20-08
by LaMarvelous on
Oct 24, 2008 10:36 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Funny, these web pages!
Interesting, next to LMA I had this inside of less than and greater than signs, which I guess the web page thought were some kind of HTML…
4: LMA, (some big veteran KP acquires)…
by Visionary1 on Oct 24, 2008 12:46 AM PDT 0 recs
I predict
that Dave will have to eat some of those words.
55 wins.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on Oct 24, 2008 12:58 AM PDT 0 recs
OK, jscot...
If the Blazers do not win exactly 55 games, I will never read another one of your posts.
PTB Liberation Day - 2/10/04
by tssbro on
Oct 24, 2008 1:13 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Your life will be simpler
and happier.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Oct 24, 2008 3:04 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I'm with you on 55, jscot.
Dave, John Hollinger, Kelly Dwyer, and others who predict the Blazers to finish in the low-to-mid 40s are riding the numbers train to the wrong destination. I believe that they are ignoring or undervaluing variables like Oden’s impact, Sergio’s resurgence, and the emerging dominance of the White unit.
I actually think 52 wins is more accurate, but who am I to argue with jscot? Besides, if Dave can predict that the Hornets will win the West but really it will be the Lakers, I can predict 55 wins and 52 wins. It’s two-fer Friday, folks!
"Personally, I'd rather give an elephant a prostate exam on Chili Day." --Dave on rooting for the Lakers or Celtics
by MiledAnimal on
Oct 24, 2008 9:37 AM PDT
up
0 recs
OK, I should have been more detailed
So I’ll do it now before the first game.
1. 55 wins.
2. Nate wins COY.
3. Oden averages at least 15-10 and wins ROY.
4. Rudy averages double figures in points and five assists off the bench.
5. Brandon is an all-star. So is either Greg or LMA, probably LMA.
6. Greg plays in excess of 70 games. He fouls out between 5-10 games.
7. Jerryd may not crack the rotation this year, but by the end of the year, everyone knows he is going to do so next year.
8. Channing plays well enough to earn a nice contract, here or elsewhere.
9. Blake and Webster both shoot over 40% from distance.
10. We have a disastrous playoff series in which we don’t play to our potential due to inexperience, etc. I do not know whether it happens in the first or second round or the WCF, but we will not make the Finals, despite having the talent and wins to look like a contender.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Oct 28, 2008 12:48 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Give me that first round series against the L*kers...
And I guarantee you we are not going home in anything less than 7 games.
And the Rose Garden will suffer severe structural damage because of the noise.
by AndrewD on Oct 24, 2008 1:12 AM PDT 0 recs
I think
Brandon Roy is the leading scorer. I thought Aldridge would be the leading scorer by a lot last year, but Roy is more consistently good and that makes the difference.
Sergio has a knack for making passes that lead to layups and dunks, for both teams. - Ben G.
by jamon51 on Oct 24, 2008 1:14 AM PDT 0 recs
the boring-as-paste conundrum
last year it was very clear, blazers fans should root for the (elti(s, because they were playing the l*kers who we were raised to dislike, milesgate has somewhat leveled the playing field, if we had to replay last years finals again, any satisfaction gained by seeing the l*kers lose, would be somewhat offset by seeing the (elti(s win.
I think dave is just cleaverly avoiding controversy,
I’ll predict the boring-as-paste l*kers vs (elti(s and it goes to 7 games, at which point some time early in the 4th quarter, one of the teams goes up by 20, and either KG’s or Kobe’s ego detonates killing both sides instantly, one side claims victory while the other claims Kobe or the ghost of Red Auerbach would have brought them back, but no one ever truly knows, Chris Paul and Lebron feel guilty for having lost in the conference finals and go cuckoo becoming shells of their former selves until KP picks them up in exchange for the return of New Orleans and Clevelands own second round picks, and explains to them that it wasn’t their fault. Lamarcus Aldrige and Greg Oden get traded for Zach Randolph and Shawn Bradley and the ’Zers dominate with the All-NBA first name is a last name lineup of paul/roy/james/randolph/bradley
by contemnor on Oct 24, 2008 1:30 AM PDT 0 recs
Oden will win ROY
It won’t be as unanimous as Roy’s win, but Oden will get all the bestest votes.
Beasley: everyone hates him, won’t get enough shots, his coach will try to make sure he is playing right to make him grow up.
Rose: Rookie PG, so-so teammates, only one year in college. Will be great, needs more time.
OJ Mayo: Will shoot low 40% or lower, share the ball with Rudy Gay, and the team will suck. Even if he scores 18ppg, everyone will point to his horrible percentage and bad team.
Kevin Love: He’ll be solid, but I can’t see him having better pure numbers than Oden and we know his team won’t be as good.
No one else is a serious candidate for ROY, if ya ask me. Oden will get the minutes, be on a team that gets MAJOR national attention, and every media writer (and they’re the voters) already loves Greg and WANTS to give the award to him as properly scripted. The buzz will be how the award usually goes for best stats, not best player, and that this will change dangit! Oden made this young team lots better and will easily win ROY, even if his numbers aren’t outstanding.
HOWEVER, I think Oden will actually have the best pure stats out of the entire group. An easy double/double, at least 2 blocks, and perhaps 1.5 assists or up. Only OJ Mayo will be able to get enough shots for big numbers, and he is an undersized SG (and not quick and explosive like similarly undersized Wade). He’ll be good, but have a rough shooting rookie year (I state it as a fact because I have seen the future but only use my powers for NBA prognistication.)
Love could do a double double, but he’ll have his own problems being a super slow, SUPER undersized and out of shape 6’8"-on-a-good-day PF in the NBA. Plus, no one will see the Wolves this season.
All eyes are on us. Even if Oden ONLY plays as well as he has played this pre-season (which I highly doubt; he’ll continue to get in better shape and more confident), he’s got the ROY sewed up.
Of course, this all doesn’t really matter. As long as he’s healthy and we’re winning, I honestly don’t care that much about ROY. It still is a cool award and really helps a player’s confidence, and starts the first chapter in Oden’s legend off on the right foot. But really— I’m cool with him not getting the award.
Oh… and Rudy will get votes, and everyone loves him, but he’ll only be able to win the award if his numbers are OUTSTANDING. They very well might be, but I don’t think he’ll get those numbers consistently— though we’ve already seen how Rudy can have a terrific, game altering performance and not have it completely show up in the box score. 12 ppg and 3 assists and a steal would be a TERRIFIC rookie year for him, and he’ll be more valuable than even those numbers.
If Raw as Cookie Dough pre-season Oden can do 13 and 8 in 23 minutes a night, the Oden that has some more time to bake in the oven and get used to the NBA will be able to top it.
My bold, homerish prediction: 51 and 31, 7th seed. If we face the Lakers in the 1st round, we murderalize ‘em. If we face the Hornets, it goes 7 games and we lose in New Orleans. If we face the Spurs, we lose in 5. They’ll out veteran us to pieces.
For the award races, we can’t underestimate how much we’ll be in the national spotlight, on TNT, how popular Oden already is, and our record that will be directly tied to adding Oden to the team. The award is his to lose and I doubt he loses it.
Obviously, like always, I still pretty much agree with everything else Dave says.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on Oct 24, 2008 1:56 AM PDT 0 recs
Against the Spurs
If we face the Spurs, we lose in 5. They’ll out veteran us to pieces.
I definitely disagree with this sentiment. I don’t know if anyone remember this, but Nate almost beat the Spurs with a much less talented roster in Seattle, and that is when the Spurs were in there prime. Timmy D has a hard time with legit C’s D’ing him up. Manu is great, but he’s starting to get on the wrong side of years. After that, our depth really does a number on San Antonio. I’m worried about a lot of other teams, but San Antonio, not so much.
by as11osu on
Oct 24, 2008 2:14 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I'll happily agree
Once we actually beat them in real life, because they are a team we seem to never be able to beat. They just out veteran us, even if I think we got more all-round talent up and down the roster right now.
Like you point out, Nate often gets his teams to overachieve, and I could see us winning pretty much any 1st round matchup.
I just see the Spurs as a dangerous matchup because of HOW experienced they are, when that isn’t a worry with the Hornets or Lakers (our most likely playoff opponents if we’re the 7th or 8th seed). The Spurs know playoff basketball better than any team out there, and always turn it up then. I think it would be extremely tough to beat them in 7 games… too much Duncan, too much Parker and Ginobili running circles around our so-so perimeter defense, and Popovich is a great coach who will prepare very well against our many weapons.
If we DID get past them, I like our chances to go even further. They’re the only team I worry about meeting in the 1st round.
Mortimer
by Mortimer on
Oct 24, 2008 2:21 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Besides that
this is their year to win after their off year last year. Not saying they will, but they won’t go quietly into the night this year.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Oct 24, 2008 3:08 AM PDT
up
0 recs
The Lakers
are the Dallas Cowboys of the NBA.
Before the NFL preseason was even over, the Cowboys had already been crowned the Super Bowl champs. With the otherworldly collection of talent that Jerrah Jones had amassed, it barely even made sense to play the games. We all knew how it turned out and, besides, people would wind up getting hurt.
OK; so things haven’t worked out nicely nicely for the Cowboys. Fortunately for the acolytes of the Conventional Wisdom, the NBA season is upon us and redemption is nigh. For this time, truly, It Is Written. Kobe is already hoisting the Larry O’Brien trophy at center court of the Staples Center. Phil Jackson has already cemented his legacy as the greatest basketball coach of all time. And forget Greg Oden; Andrew Bynum is already the benchmark against which all other NBA centers must be measured.
Hopefully, David Stern does the right thing and cancels the season. Because if they, like, actually play the games, well – things could get very untidy, very quickly. What if the Lakers improbably lost to Portland in the first round of the playoffs? When considered in conjunction with the Cowboys’ meltdown, there would be no choice but to conclude that entopy has indeed taken hold of the American sports universe. The consequences could be devastating. Could our nation ever recover from seeing Kobe – one of our Olympiad heroes – as something less than the basketball deity we now know him to be? How would our national psyche withstand the horror of witnessing Kobe – KOBE! – looking upon the harsh media glare with the following visage:

by knickfan on Oct 24, 2008 2:04 AM PDT 1 recs
Yuck
That’s disgusting.
there would be no choice but to conclude that entopy has indeed taken hold of the American sports universe.
from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14519143
‘Entopy’: localized mucosal allergic disease in the absence of systemic responses for atopy.
CONCLUSION: These findings support the concept of localized nasal allergy in ‘non-atopic’ rhinitis subjects. We propose the term ‘entopy’ to define this phenomenon and believe that this concept has a wider implication for localized allergic responses in other mucosal sites.
Knickfan says non-systemic snot allergies are taking over the American sports universe. I wondered what that picture he posted was, but anyway, now I know why he kept mentioning Kobe.
I’m kind of glad I live over here. Things are getting rather disordered on that side of the water.
The most amazing thing about my amazing ego is I have amazingly little about which to be egotistical.
The pick and roll this year will emphasize "roll" followed by "dunk", followed by the wailings and lamentations of your women.
by jscot on
Oct 24, 2008 3:19 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Imagine if he had used the word "entropy"
That means “ropey snot” doesn’t it?
"Fez, the foundation of any good relationship is three little words: I-don't-know.
What're you doing? I don't know.
What're you thinking about? I don't know.
Who's that under you? I don't know. "
-Michael Kelso
by 92wastheyear on
Oct 24, 2008 6:11 AM PDT
up
0 recs
No
It’s what you use to lasso Tree-men in Middle Earth.
Thank you, thank you – I’ll be in the lounge all week – try the salmon!
by DonkeyShins on
Oct 24, 2008 8:00 AM PDT
up
0 recs
+1
TreeBeard would not be happy. GO kinda looks like TreeBeard, doesn’t he?
In general, the art of government consists in taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other.
by TTRocks on
Oct 24, 2008 4:09 PM PDT
up
0 recs
TreeBeard
gets a +1 too. Good nick name for Oden.
by lethaldose on
Oct 24, 2008 11:13 PM PDT
up
0 recs
"You should find a hobby."
The psychologist to his Spanish patient: “You should find a hobby”.
The patient: “Yeah, and where do you think I might find a damn little guy from the Middle Earth!?”
Sergio + Rudy = 16
Sergio + Bayless = 16
Batum 8+8=16
by amlmart1 on
Oct 24, 2008 11:27 PM PDT
up
0 recs
futhermore
who thought that the Rays and Phillies would make the World Series (free tacos anyone?).
No one predicted the Titans would be 7-0 (and Vince Young is injured).
The Chargers are struggling, they were the other big pick to go to the Super Bowl.
WWKPD?
Ambassador to the Miami Heat
by Magnum on
Oct 24, 2008 11:15 AM PDT
up
0 recs
My Take
I’m not convinced Greg won’t get the Roy, simply because if he doesn’t, you have to ask the other question – which is “who else”. Remember, three of the ten preseason choices are Blazers, meaning that we’ll have to look at the other seven. I also found it interesting that whereas Sergio started the early pre-season games, Bayless was given the nod in the last two, and his stats showed up pretty well. Other than Brewer, I don’t see any “immediate impact” type of players. Granted, you have the three guards of Rose, Mayo and Gordon, but they’ll be streaky, as all rookies are. And, like Bayless, they’ll get points – if they get enough playing time. And of the three, Gordon and Mayo are the most likely to get that time, given the teams they play on, as Chicago has already said they don’t expect Rose to be a starter. (Welcome to the NBA – Rose and Bayless).
Oden will have three things in his favor. Initially, he’ll be the starter and he’ll get the minutes. Then, he will have an ongoing defensive impact – and none of the other players mentioned for Roy can match that simple reality. Then, he’ll have the most rebounds. That leaves only points. It’s likely the others may have more points, but they won’t have the rebounds, blocks, or defensive impact of Oden. And, other than Beasely, Mayo and Gordon – they aren’t going to have the minutes either.
As far as other issues, I’ve always thought that 45-47 wins is the likely scenerio. Further, given early injuries to Blake, Fernandez, and Frye, as well as Webster, I think our play will be a little ragged early and that will pull our win total down. The second 1/2 of the season is what I’m targetting. By then, Webster will be back, and Fernandez, Oden and Bayless will have 42 games under their belt.
Only in that time frame will we begin to see the Blazers increasingly gel. Webster creates a problem, let’s face it. Outlaw is a combo SF/PF whose defense on the better SF’s is clealy suspect, Batum is very inexperienced, and Fernandez and Roy are not really SF’s. Batum might defense pretty well, but the rest of his game will be streaky.
This is going to cost us some wins – like it or not.
by Eben Calder on Oct 24, 2008 7:06 AM PDT 0 recs
Here's where I disagree ...
I’ve looked at our schedule pretty closely, and all I see are *W*s, no *L*s at all. So that puts us at 82 wins, which means 2nd round of playoffs at least.
An even assessment?
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on Oct 24, 2008 7:36 AM PDT 1 recs
I had to rec this.
You just have to go with such positive thinking.
hakkaa päälle !
by timg56 on
Oct 24, 2008 7:56 AM PDT
up
0 recs
I'm only half-kidding
I caught myself going down the schedule saying “W” or “L” aloud and after about week two, all I was saying was "W"W"W"W"W"W"W"W…"
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Oct 24, 2008 8:14 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Jinx
EVERY time I’ve ever looked at the upcoming slew of games and tried to predict the outcomes, THAT is the moment we go on our four or five game losing streak. EVERY time. So I just… won’t do that. Anymore. Ever.
by zaruga on
Oct 24, 2008 8:53 PM PDT
up
0 recs
a good rule.
Rudyculize: The act of Rudy making others look slow, dim and generally oafish.
http://www.myspace.com/y5k
by Y5k on
Oct 27, 2008 6:14 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Dang you beat me to it.
I’ve been working on a prediction post for a while. ah well. I will attempt to copy and past over and hopefully this will work.
My predictions:
Steve Blake stays our PG. Bayless hasn’t shown he has it yet and Sergio isn’t that good yet, but fills a nice energy role. Rudy and Roy may take time at the point, but I think Steve is the Starter.
The Small Forward Position will go to Webster. Batum will be the back-up and Roy will see some time in this position as well.
Sergio is our #2 PG. This is coming from the guy who predicted that Bayless would be a starter half way through the year. Bayless seems to be trying to hard, and that never works out well. He needs to find his rhythm. Until he does, Sergio will definitely be the better Point Guard. His chemistry with Rudy wil also help him out.
Oden will play only 20 minutes a game for the first month of the regular season. Even with that he’s going to be tired and drained. Despite this I think that 15 pts and 10 rebound average is perfectly doable. I don’t see his minutes increasing by more than 30 very often.
Wins will be abundant. I’ve been in the 48-52 camp for a while now. I believe the only thing holding us back from more will be the fact that this is a BRAND NEW TEAM, yet again, and Oden’s conditioning. Because we’re a new team again, we’ll be learning where team mates go, move, and how they think. This will cost us some games. Other teams can run plays with their eyes shut. We can’t yet. Oden’s conditioning will effect how tired he is, how long he can last, and whether he’ll play more than 20 minutes.
Webster will show why he’s the starter. He’s not going to impress with a high scoring average, but he’ll do the little things that help teams win. This is his year, but if he does it right, it’ll be a quiet year because what he needs to do doesn’t all fit the stat lines. You’ll see it on the floor though.
Rudy is going to tear it up. He’s also going to have minor injuries during the year. He doesn’t hold back and that’s why we love him, but that sort of play can also grind up the body with little knick knack injuries.
Aldridge will average over 20 points a game and 9 rebounds and 1 block. He doesn’t make the all-star team, but he does get media recognition for being better than expected.
Roy’s scoring goes up a little, and he averages one more assist this year.
Nate‘s job wouldn’t last more than four losses, if it were up to the vocal blazer fans. People will be calling for nate to be fired again despite the fact he has ANOTHER brand new team to deal with.
This is the last year for brand new teams.
We win in LA the first game.
We win against the Spurs at home.
We will have win streaks and losing streaks.
So, those are the things that I posted and I wanted to wait until the Jazz game so I could get a feel of people in person.
So, final predictions for the wins? I’ve been in the 48-52 camp for a while then I watched the jazz game and watched Blazer scrubs build a ten point lead… I began to wonder… then they lost a ten point lead. We have a team with the potential to win 60 games. I don’t think we will. We’re young and still learning and 60 games really requires experience from everyone. It’s about how the ball bounces, but also that quick second decision and that little inch that makes a difference, and the blazers just aren’t that fine tuned yet. Even with great chemistry, I don’t think they will be.
I look out at the teams out there, and I’m not afraid of any of them. all of them are beatable for us.
Regular season prediction: 52 wins. I’ve been dead on or only one off the past three years, let’s hope that trend continues. The assumption is that we avoid major injury. If we have some short term naggging injuries we could see that number fall to 48. Major injuries and we could fall down to 44.
We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.
by ratbastird on Oct 24, 2008 7:50 AM PDT 0 recs
oh yeah
Playoffs:
We make it and how deep we go will depend on our match-ups. I think we’re weak to the spurs, but strong against the lakers, hornets, and Jazz. We’re even against houston. We’ll slaughter Dallas and the suns will pose a problem for us as well because Oden won’t be able to dominate.
Celtics make it in the east.
Rookie of the year? I need to go with Oden. Rudy will be incredible, but Oden is the guy who makes the biggest difference for us.
We haven't done anything yet... but don't blink.
by ratbastird on
Oct 24, 2008 7:53 AM PDT
up
0 recs
My hope
I have no illusions about the Blazers going deep into the playoffs – if they get into the first round, I’ll look upon that as ‘missi


