I think Nate missed a perfect opportunity
Just prior to the end of regulation. Stand 5 players: Blake, Sergio, Frye, Martell and Pryz.
Tell them to run one play for either martell or Frye and pull them at the next time out. Would have screwed the Bulls totally...no overtime.
5 fresh people, they would have had to call a timeout to adjust. Oh well, guess that is why I am not an NBA coach.
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
ummm
by myemic23 on Jan 3, 2008 11:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I partially agree
by yellow hummer on Jan 3, 2008 11:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
The Blazers didn't get out rebounded...
Wallace got 14 boards, LMA 13. It worked.
by bubba on Jan 3, 2008 11:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
5 fresh players?
I dont know why JJack got some much burn considering how well Blake was playing in the first half. Oh well, at least the Bulls did not put on much backcourt pressure, which JJack seems to have trouble with.
by jonestr on Jan 4, 2008 12:26 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
arm chair qb
by lyfefindsaway on Jan 4, 2008 1:24 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Isn't this what
by jayseyfield on Jan 4, 2008 2:02 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Nate obviously doesn't know how to coach
What a downer to lose the last game of the year, just when you think you've turned the corner.
And it wasn't like it was a tough one. I mean, we won at Utah earlier in the month, so it isn't like it was beyond us.
Now, we've only got a two-game winning streak, and we had to go to double-overtime on the road to get that. This is just pathetic. We've only won five of our last six road games, too. People think this might be a playoff team? Come on.
by jscot on Jan 4, 2008 2:03 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
What??
by TheOdenator on Jan 4, 2008 9:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Would I do that?
We should lose, and lose, and lose, and Nate knows it. What's wrong with him? Next thing you know, he'll be winning the division so we get a high seed, and don't get the opportunity to get proper playoff experience by playing a really tough team in the first round.
And furthermore, if this team wins the division, and makes it past the first round of the playoffs, Oden will never get MVP, because no one will ever believe we needed him that much. Nate just seems to be messing up everything, don't you think?
What does "ironic" mean, anyway?
by jscot on Jan 4, 2008 9:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
master, not mater
by jscot on Jan 4, 2008 9:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well Said
by tominhawaii on Jan 4, 2008 11:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
And then, when it looked like Nate was getting them on a streak, KP had LMA sit out for five games, and Nate went and messed that up, too.
by jscot on Jan 4, 2008 2:12 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nate tried to throw the game last night too
by tominhawaii on Jan 4, 2008 3:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nate is defining roles.
At first I thought he was blinded by the fact that JJ's game is quite similar to Nate's back in the day. Now I'll admit that Jarrett will defend a perimeter shooter like no one else on our roster. And, yes Nate, he's improving at an amazing rate. And yes, Nate, he took his removal from the starters with class and poise that I didn't know he had. Okay, okay. You were right.
We have exactly 5 closers.
The team knows everybody's individual role. No way Nate changes things last night with ten minutes of overtime. Live or die by what you preach, I guess.
by ojala on Jan 4, 2008 6:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
JJ was the man last night
by DonkeyShins on Jan 4, 2008 11:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















