Blazersedge: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's College Football Week 12 Alphabetical

A Tough Question

With 99.9% of our problem children now gone I'd like to ask a semi-problematic question that's been on my mind for a while now.

Where, how, and how much do off-court issues affect your ability to root for your favorite athletes/performers/entertainers?  (In some way NBA players are all three.)

Obviously this has been a front-burner issue for Blazer fans for many years but what brought it home for me again was last week's Chris Benoit story.  For those who don't know, Benoit was an enormously popular, enormously talented wrestler with the WWE...a huge fan favorite.  Last week he was found dead along with his wife and child in an apparent murder-suicide.  (I don't want to go into more detail than that or have it brought up here more than that.  Thank you for respecting that.)  Of course immediately after he was found and before the details became widely known there was an enormous outpouring of support, grief, and fantastic memories of him as a performer.  But then after the horrible truth was revealed and you found out that something very, very bad had gone on, you kind of had mixed feelings.  Was it really proper to even talk about, let alone remember fondly, his professional performances in the wake of such a tragedy and such an act?  Was that disrespecting the victims?  I still go 'round and 'round about resolving that in my own head/heart and frankly thinking about it makes me kind of ill.

Again...this can be pulled right back to the Blazers who brought up this same kind of dilemma, though obviously on a much, much smaller scale, for much of this decade.

Where is the line here?  Is there a point where it's just inappropriate and crass to root for and applaud someone professionally when you know something about them personally that's just not OK?  How much does it, or should it, matter?  How do you reconcile those things if you still want to root for your team (and is it even fair to do so)?

I didn't dare bring this up when it was an ongoing issue lest there be a nuclear holocaust in the comment section, but now that we've been through it and appear relatively safe, perhaps we can draw some wisdom from the past that will help us in the future...or at least make interesting conversation.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

0 recs  |  Comment 31 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I assume that this is about Zach
so I will treat it as such.  Zach did some stupid things while he was here, but I didn't particular care about some of the more memorable stuff he did.  For instance the infamous Strippergate.  That didn't really bother me, I mean, I thought he was a moron but it didn't make me root for him less.  We've all blown off a day of work to do something different, or at least I have.

The stuff that did bother me was where Zach's actions negatively impacted other people.  Reckless driving and firing guns is not just Zach being a moron.  It's dangerous. Even if its not Zach doing it, he is responsible for what his boys do.  Someone could end up dead.  That was the kind of stuff that soured me on Zach.

by JPop on Jul 5, 2007 1:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Not necessarily about Zach
In fact I saved it until after Zach was traded specifically so it wouldn't become a "love Zach/hate Zach" thread.  There were a lot of people in the Blazers' past.  That provides our connection to the question.  But the question really is more theoretical/philosophical than directed at any one of those players.

--Dave

by Dave on Jul 5, 2007 1:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

my philosophy basically is the same
As long as their stupidity hurts no one but themselves, I don't mind it.  If Sheed and Damon want to get weeded I can't say I approve but who are they really hurting?  On the flipside, a convicted rapist is impossible for me to root for.  I actually felt good when Zach popped him in the eye.

by JPop on Jul 5, 2007 1:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Weed issue
but that DOES effect the team.  It slows down the reflexes which makes the slower on the court.

Normally i have no issue with it, but if I'm paying people to perform at a high level, i want them performing 100%

Hard work beats talent when talent fails to work hard.

by ratbastird on Jul 5, 2007 4:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree 100%
I don't think that it was a strange coincidence that Damon had one of his best years as a Blazer in the same season that he started taking random drug tests from Canzano.
I want my front court aLaMOde!!

by shenanigans on Jul 5, 2007 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It depends for me
I liked Zach. I wasn't bothered by alot of the stuff he did. He made some dumb decisions that I obviously don't support or agree with, but when you took a step back and looked at him, he seemed like a good nice guy. He wasn't some punk jerk.

I would take 12 zbo's or 12 dmiles. A guy who quits on the team. I would never want someone like that.

I would always prefer players who seem like role model people, like Roy seems, Wade seems that way, and alot of athletes are that way. But not everybody is, that's just the way it is. There are some things that would prevent me from rooting for a player no matter what.

Alot of rape issues I don't pay attention to, because I feel most the time the woman is simply trying to get money (i.e. I believe this about Kobe, and Zbo last summer)

Also, I'd rather have a team of 12 Roy like guys, who are only average or good, maybe a playoff round or 2, over a championship with 12 jerks.

Welcome Greg Oden

by junit3123 on Jul 5, 2007 2:35 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think it's funny...
that you mention Kobe.  Here's an arrogant but talented athlete who shows no loyalty at all, (first to his hometown Philly, and now L.A. his
"adopted" hometown), and cheats on his wife (may or may not have been rape).

And yet any team in the league would mortgage their future for a shot to sign him, (except maybe the Blazers).

I think we have to acknowledge there is a curve.  The more talent a player has, the more we are willing to put up with.  I'm just glad Portland has guys with talent and character.  That's how champoionships are made.

by mjm6783 on Jul 6, 2007 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good question
Prior to the Jail blazers i think I would have been more tolerant.

Now... I would rather have a team i can love and root for and who is losing than a team that's winning full of kobe or other problematic star players.

My biggest issue would be a lack of on court team harmony or quitting on the team during game.  I expect professionals.

Off court, I don't want to see criminal offenses. Strip bars?  Whatever.  It's legal and it irks me that people can condemn in the newspaper something that everyone is allowed to do.  Maybe newspapers should report on EVERYONE who goes to strip bar so that they can impose their moral opinions WITHOUT those pesky laws getting in the way.

I just don't want my players to be knuckle heads.

Hard work beats talent when talent fails to work hard.

by ratbastird on Jul 5, 2007 4:42 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Now that I have kids of my own its important
I don't want my young son looking up to guys like Zach, it's that simple.  Depsite what he does on the court, Zach Randolph is a terrible role model.  

In addition, this is my city, I grew up here and I've lived here all my life.  I want people here who are going to respect it, Zach never did.

by leeroyjenkins on Jul 5, 2007 7:01 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Can't identify with bad characters
One of my pet peeves is when fans say things such as "WE lost again" or "How are WE doing?" to which I want to ask, "How long have YOU been on the team?"

But the fact is, psychologically, when we root for teams we identify with them and they, on some level, become a part of us. Given that, how can anybody with self pride root for a bunch of bad characters simply because they're winning?

It's always been important to me to not only win, but to win right. I've always found dishonest victories to be hollow victories and having a team of bad apples flirts with that hollowness.

In the end, it depends on how bad the thing is that they're accused of doing. If they're doing something I could see myself doing (or doing at that age) then I can roll with it. I'm no angel, but on the other hand I've never been arrested or subject to a police investigation. Of course I've also never been a young multi-millionaire member of the ethnic minority in Portland either.

In the end, the character of the players does matter. You should have a team you can talk up to non-believers and bring them into the fold. You should have a team that you can share with children. You should be lucky enough to have a team like the Blazers have now become.

by jon on Jul 5, 2007 7:01 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The funny thing is...
I don't miss the Jailblazer players.  

There are certain guys that you connect with over the years. Watching them play, getting to know their personality (in a limited way for sure), taking part in watching them grow as basketball players and people.  This is what it means to root for someone.  You want to see them succeed on the court and in life.  It gives you hope that if you work hard and play the game right, you will succeed too.

The only major player from that era that I have any type of connection to is Damon.  He seemed to figure things out and grow up during his time in Portland.  There were alot of guys I wanted to like but you can only take so much.

I always hoped Zach would be that type of guy.  I hope he figures it out in NY.  I am glad I don't have to wait on him anymore and I won't really miss watching him play.
   

by tssbro on Jul 5, 2007 7:19 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

thank-god
my 3 nephews look at me as their role*model,reason i work hard,take care them,and make sure they're happy.did i want to raise them on my own at i.st hell's no,but with my brother gone and their mom suffering from breast cancer at the time,my mom convinced me to raise them.that said i'll do zbo 1.st,he's seriously looking at a mansion about 10 minutes from my house.when he told reporters he want's to live in the country,and matthewc can agree with this 1.j.canzano article came to my mind about zbo's neighbors.i started laughing out loud.the knicks and rangers live up here in westchester county,miles outside the city.so zbo welcome to the neighborhood.and of course the old saying,you can take the boy out of the ghetto,but you can't take the ghetto out of the boy.he'll never change he'll just get away with it in nyc. and now for c.benoit,belive it or not more than 70% of the no-life wwe fans support c.benoit.why because they have no lives most of them.like the wwe itself the fans are making excuses for these guys.it's called no self esteem,i've been to wwe events and most of the fans are fat overwieght people with no lives,no social skills,and the others are outcast people or men*women who are over 30 and still think they're in high school. bottom line benoit was a sicko who if he was'nt a coward by taking his own life,america woul've loved to see him get a hangin..as for zbo he's a follower not a criminal,and needs to grow up and leave his buddies home in marion.just grow up zbo.

by fatty on Jul 5, 2007 7:34 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Personal Responsibility
Character and Integrity doesn't mean a concern never arises.  In fact those attributes do not come to the fore until a concern arises.  Once a cup is shaken, then we all see what is inside.

If someone begins with excuses (like saying he was just following the crowd) then we don't need that person on our team or in our community.  If someone begins with ownership of their actions, then they are on the pathway to maturity.

by castle on Jul 5, 2007 8:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yup
Character is about doing the right thing even when it hurts. We haven't seen that from Zach or his like except through coaching from the organization, which simply highlights their lack of character. Good riddance. I can't root for someone with a poor character.

by jamon51 on Jul 5, 2007 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

castle
i totally agree with you dude !!!!

by fatty on Jul 5, 2007 9:02 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

In these times
it seems to be more and more important for me to be able to respect the players that I put so much energy into rooting for. When Whitsett's experiments first started going awry, I was pretty tolerant. I figured why should the players be held to higher standards than the rest of society. The team had some strong positive character (Sabonis, Pippen, Steve Smith, Brian Grant etc.) to balance the negative, their on court chemistry seemed good, and they were winning. As time went by they became too heavily weighted towards the negative. I started to become embarrased of my team, and became acutely aware that for alot of the nation, the "Jail Blazers" was all that people knew about Portland. I realized that we deserved a team that exhibited a strong moral character that was in line with what I feel is the predominant character of Portlanders and Oregonians in general.
 As far as the pot issue, I have expressed my feelings on this issue a couple of times on this site. In short, I suspect that there are quite a few NBA players that smoke, just as there are millions of Americans that imbibe, from all economic and cultural backgrounds.  I expect the players that want to do this to do it in moderation, and certainly not on game days, and to do it discretely. That is just my opinion, and I don't think it contradicts my desire for them to match Oregonian's moral character, because some of the most outstanding traits that this state has always held is it's progressive, independent thought, and it's committment to individual liberties.
Now I'm going to possibly open up a can of worms, but I think it's relevant. How confusing must it be for our young people to understand what is the appropriate moral character when we are faced with a government that is exhibiting such corruption, disdain for the law, disregard of honesty as a core value, lack of integrity, and motivation for seemingly nothing but financial gain. Even the debate over these issues leads to devisiveness and name calling, exageration, and lying. All traits not included in a healthy morality. This not only effects young fans, but the newest players coming into the league are a product of these times.
Confusing perhaps, but a solidifying and uniting force for us older fans, and apparently for the "new" Blazers as well.

by crakarjack on Jul 5, 2007 10:14 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Interesting topic Dave.
I'm not sure why, but your line about feeling a little ill caused me to think about Kersey.  He was one of my all time favorite Blazers but the whole underage thing from Utah really colored my memories of him.  I'm still a little conflicted but when I recall my favorite Blazers from his era it's TP, Clyde, Buck, and Duck but not Kersey & Cliffy.  It's sort of sad too because I often use Jerome as an example of what I love to see in a player on the court.  

Definitely conflicted.

In Kevin Pritchard we trust.

by TP43 on Jul 5, 2007 11:00 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That was the first thing I thought of, too.
Same thing:  Kersey was a favorite of mine from his rookie season.  And then came the Utah thing.  Feh.  I retired all my Kersey t-shirts then and there.  It was just . . . disappointing.

by roseburgian on Jul 5, 2007 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Character is who you are
when no one is looking, according to a very old saying.

Character is also who you are when everyone is looking and making demands of you - in other words, under pressure - which is why character should matter to sports fans.

GMs and organizations who choose to ignore character end up creating "teams" whose players implode under pressure and whose off-the-court actions make their fans ashamed of being fans.

I've been a Blazers fan since Rick Adelman was playing guard for them, and it took the Blazers organization many, many, many years to alienate me, but they finally succeeded three years ago and I simply stopped caring about them. As far as I was concerned, the Blazers were just a collection of knuckleheads, morons, and malcontents who exemplified everything that was and is wrong with pro athletes nowadays. My family would ask if I was going to watch the Blazers play and I'd shock them by saying "No". I wanted nothing to do with the "team" and the empty seats in the Rose Garden showed that I was not alone.

Thankfully, that is all in the past now. We once again have a real team with talented, hard-working players of which we can be very proud.

Thanks, KP. Thanks, Paul. It's good to be back!

Rip City!

by dmac on Jul 5, 2007 11:14 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I wish I wouldn't...
cheer for head cases, malcontents, scalawags, and derelicts, but I do on occasion.  Why do I do this? Because they are good athletes and they help my team to wins (at least in the short term). And because, fans have to play the hand we are dealt.

Except now we have as clean a slate as we are going to get.  I hope the management continues to build this team with high character hires at all positions.

by lama on Jul 5, 2007 12:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Character? we're talk character?
Dave, In my mind the line has been crossed so many times that the paint is no loger visible. But the two that I will never forgive or forget would have to be Bonzi spitting on Danny Ferry and Quintel Woods and his dog fighting. True story, I bought a ticket to the next Blazer home game as close to the bench as I could get after the dog fight story broke, just to give him a ration. Unfortunately or fortunately depending on your persective, he was no long with the team.  
2-4 the who

by 24thewho on Jul 5, 2007 12:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

2 things
  1. if we are talking about charactor, partying with strippers and drinking at bars is perfectly legal, in fact most people have probably drank at a strip club before, so why crucify Zach for doing so.  He might make 100 times the amount of money that we do but should he really have to live every aspect of his life according to a consensus groups judgement?? Who are we to say that Zach cant do this or Zach cant do that.  He has never hurt anyone(except ruben who is a rapist anyway). The line Dave speaks of should seperate actions that hurt themselves(drinking, strippers, weed) and things that hurt others(rape, dog fighting, assault). The things that hurt others should never be tolerated.

  2. If your kid looks up to Zach and turns out to be a piece of crap in real life, its not because his idol was Zach. Its because somewhere on down the line the parents didnt efficiently apply good morals and values in their children.  If your kid looks up to a "bad guy", its up to you to make them understand why he is "bad", and how to avoid being like him. Bad parents make bad children, Zach Randolph cant be responsible for a child he has never even met or influenced in person.

by myemic23 on Jul 5, 2007 1:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Zach being a strip club patron is not the issue
The majority of complaints about Zach are (1) black hole offense, (2) weak defense, (3) hangs around with people that get his name in the paper for off-court crap, and (4) makes dumb choices. The strip club stuff just is residue of (3) and (4).

I understand and mostly agree with your two points. However, there are no negative actions that only hurt one person. Player X hangs around in a club at the expense of his kids and wife. Player X drinks too much the night before a game and calls in sick. These things are legal. Because Player X CAN do something legally, doesn't mean he holds no responsibility for his actions.

I thought Zach did a great job on the court this year and I don't hate the guy. I'm glad he's off the team because it frees minutes for LaMarcus.

by lama on Jul 5, 2007 3:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Spurs
I unapologetically detest the Spurs. They're all stand up guys who play the right way and never do anything embarrassing off the court. And I hate them for it. They exemplify everything that everybody says they want in a team and I can't stand 'em. I hate watching them. If Manu Ginobili would just fire off some shots at a strip club, I'd consider rooting for him. In fact the only one on the team I kinda respect is Robert Horry. Personally, I've always found the impulse to entangle moral purity and athletic prowess to be creepily fascistic.

by Jumbo on Jul 5, 2007 2:49 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Pathetic
I hope you are joking.

What does it mean to be heroic?  Isn't discipline and self-sacrifice what we value?  These people have abilities transcending the rest of us.  It is easy for them to command attention and take advantage and surround themselves with sycophants and pretend they are little gods.

When they choose the harder road, to put others first and look after the team and see responsibility  as more important than authority, then they become on the inside what they obviously are on the outside.

Bad behavior is common, rising above it is special.  Sorry you think otherwise.

by castle on Jul 5, 2007 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heroism
Discipline and self-sacrifice are Commie values. I'm an American. We value money and sexual prowess. Everything else is for suckers.

by Jumbo on Jul 6, 2007 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

At least give them some credit
I always defended Zach while he was still a blazer but after "Strippergate," I just felt dirty. Granted the whole thing was ALLEGED, but just having it out there made me feel uncomfortable rooting for and defending him. I never thought he got a fair shake here. As far as his game was concerned I think that his image distorted how we interpreted it. But whatever, he is Isaiah's problem now... I just would have liked to see him stay to at least help us get back to the playoffs

I never got upset with the "jail blazers" teams, and even found their off-court antics amusing. I failed to see how what the guys did in their spare time had any effect on how they played for us (which is the only reason we would ever even know who they were in the first place). Their indescretions were their buisiness and had little effect on how I rooted for them. They were troublemakers off the court, but winners on it. They still got to the playoffs every season and even came within one quarter of the finals, which is pretty darn good in my book.

However, even though I will defend the "Jail Blazers," I must say that I feel much better rooting for this current incarnation of the team. The "new culutre" is indeed just that and I can't wait to see where the OAR core takes us

by Jaketron on Jul 5, 2007 7:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Varieties of stupidity
Screw ups such as J.R. Rider or Zach are frustrating for me as a fan.
But weedin' and wildin' aren't the only ways to show a lack of values.
Suffice it to say I will never root for or think well of Greg Anthony or Spencer Hawes.

by hugs on Jul 5, 2007 9:35 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Personal definitions, I guess
Mine fall into:

  1.  Acceptable, if slightly distasteful.  For me, that's routine attendance at strip clubs.

  2.  Dumb and deserving of a biff on the head:  Attendance at a strip club while on bereavement leave.  biff!  (Reporting said attendance as if it meant something.  biff!)  Using the press to air contract/team/personnel grievances.  biff!  (Or your personal relationships.  Yikes.)

  3.  Yer an idiot and deserve what the law gives ya:  Smoking weed in a motor vehicle.  Or drinking.  Or driving like a loon.

  4.  Simply reprehensible and unacceptable to me, personally:  Dog fighting; boinkage of underage persons; other legally nonpermissable sexual misconduct; consistently being guilty of nonperformance in one's employment--not necessarily in that order.

And probably a host of other infractions.  With all the shades of gray in the world.

I don't expect each and every athlete to be a prince and a scholar.  I would wish, however, they could be rational and decent human beings.  (When I rule the world . . .)

by roseburgian on Jul 5, 2007 9:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

SAN ANTONIO
is the best group of guys europeans can root for. america especially the bandwagon fans which makes up 95% of all nba fans.you don't have to look no farther than blazers.com since the lottery.you can't even get into the sire.anyway the spurs are the team we're trying to emulate and roy,aldridge, and treebeard are the perfect antidote for success .so jumbo you should become a pacers fan,or a nfl fan.we should fire stern and hire r.goddell,what a commissoner.boy the nba bandwagon fans would love that.san antonio oozes nothing but class and elegance.

by fatty on Jul 6, 2007 9:21 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Treebeard
That's hilarious.

by castle on Jul 6, 2007 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

A site by Blazer fans, for Blazer fans
Start posting about the Trail Blazers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Winged_vitory_small
Whither Sports
Ep_109_starvinmarvin_small
11/24 JD - Feelin' Froggy? Then Leap!
Imgp4868_small
Taking Back the Neighborhood...
Small
What a difference a year makes. Warning: contains no Blake, Roy, McMillan insults
Dscn06250517_1_small
Let's Celebrate GREG ODEN !!!

Recent FanPosts

Bender_small
Man, I hate when the Blazers play like this.
Redavatar2_small
16. We Have Liftoff! : The View from Chicago
Bucket_small
Jerryd Bayless is just as good as Derrick Rose (seriously)
Small
Was last nights game blacked out on NBAtv for Comcast viewers?
Gorilla_w_boombox_small
POLL: Who would win a Blazer dunk contest?
Oden_small
Should Brandon Roy start at PG?
Small
What do you guys think of Canzano/Quick's coverage of the Blazers these days?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Greg Oden is developing an offensive game. This is the moment in Jurassic...
oden's interview with nba.com
Historic photo of 1st Israeli & 1st Iranian to play in NBA: Omri Casspi & Hamed Haddadi
A modest proposal: Fire Mike Rice and Antonio Harvey!

Recent FanShots

Blazers up to 3rd in Hollinger's Power Ranking
Oden said it was Miller who planted a seed in his mind to attack. "He's a...
Another great Chad Ford quote - confirming the previous Oden vs. Bynum...
Periodic table of Blazers
GREAT QUOTE FROM CHAD FORD ON THE ODEN VS. DURANT DEBATE Tyler...
Oden vs Bynum
Oden makes Blazers Contenders..
PLEA: Need video of Deng catching Rudy's pass with his face
Andre Miller's incredible plus/minus last night

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Ben_small Ben.

Moderators

Pict1126_small -ken

Polar_bear_small jorga

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Jesus_icon_i_small T Darkstar

Wallpaper_small geoffm