Draft Reflections
I'm going to do the best I can to sum up my feelings on the night. And let me forewarn you, that's exactly what they're going to be...feelings. I'm going to be far more fan-ish than usual, I'm sure. It's been an exhausting night emotionally and a long day physically.
Courtesy of our good friend NightBlueFruit and his diary, here are the list of changes today:
Incoming Players
Greg Oden
Steve Francis
Channing Frye
Rudy Fernandez
Petteri Koponen
Josh McRoberts
Taurean Green
James Jones
Outgoing Players
Zach Randolph
Freddie Jones
Dan Dickau
Clearly the first, most overwhelming story of the night is that we...got...Greg...Oden. That's where the discussion should begin and end. I know it won't, not even in this post, let alone in the comments. But in the long run that is the move that will make the most difference. In fact nothing else on this list even comes close. The lesson of the evening remains, "Be really, really happy Blazer fans!" Let's not lose sight of that.
The major topic of conversation for the next few days will be the Zach trade. In some ways that's unfortunate, but that's the way it is. Some folks are asking why it had to happen on draft night and overshadow the festivities. The answer is simple: there's going to be a moratorium for a little while now until the new salary cap is calculated. On July 1st (this Sunday) teams and free agents will begin to negotiate. They won't be able to sign any deals until midway through the month when everything is set. All of those negotiations will utilize the 2007-08 salaries though. This year's salaries are going bye-bye. So to make a deal work under this year's cap it pretty much had to get done tonight. Besides, it wasn't a lock that this was going to disrupt the proceedings so much. I think many people question the timing because they also question the deal. The Blazer brain trust obviously believed in the deal though. If we all saw things through their eyes we wouldn't be questioning, we'd be parading Kevin Pritchard around on our shoulders tonight for snagging a franchise center and trading Zach all in the same evening. If we had gotten somebody popular with the crowd the party would have gone on all night long because of this move and this might be heralded as the greatest non-championship night in Blazer history. Maybe it should be anyway.
Obviously if you've read my comments you can tell that I, too, have some problems with and/or questions about the deal. These all revolve around Steve Francis. Specifically I'd like to hear the reason why this deal was attractive. (I'd also love to know what else was out there but I know that will never happen.) I think there's legitimate reason to question because we've heard this phrase from management multiple times over the last few months: we're not going to take on bad characters, bad contracts, or veterans on the decline (especially if those veterans are expensive). Steve Francis is 30 years old and his career is in free fall without a parachute. The Knicks couldn't wait to get rid of him. His contract is enormous for what he brings. Though it only lasts two years $33 million is nothing to sneeze at. He wants the ball in his hands all the time when he's on the court. He wants to take a ton of shots and be the focus of the offense. He's not a great defender. He out and out quit on his team on several occasions. He's been described as a cancer in the locker room. He's strike one, two, and three against all of the stated tenets of our new culture. I don't think any GM in the league would choose him over Zach. Now again this is just what I've seen, heard, and read. Maybe what I've seen, heard, and read is wrong. But there's a ton of smoke surrounding this guy. I don't see much difference between having him and having Zach except that Zach is a more bankable talent. In my mind that's legitimate reason to question this trade. Again this is just a feeling but the idea of having Steve Francis suit up for the Blazers leaves my insides a little empty.
Obviously a big part of the motivation for the trade was financial. In the next two years there's no gain. We save $600,000 this year and actually pay $6.3 million more in 2008-09. (That is assuming we don't just let Frye walk.) After that things get more rosy. In 2009-10 we save 11.8 million and should be far enough under the cap to sign a free agent much as Chicago did this year. We also avoid paying Zach's $17 million in 2010-11. Basically we gained some tangible relief for Paul Allen's wallet and a possible chance at a free agent window. Whether you think that's adequate compensation for losing Zach and taking Frye and Francis depends on your point of view.
For those who are thinking buyout I suspect you can pretty much forget it. Francis gets $16 and $17 million over the next two years. He can agree to a buyout and according to cap rules whatever the agreed number is will be the salary cap cost of the contract. In layman's terms that means a buyout only helps us if Francis is willing to take less money. At 30 years old and performing like he is he's never, ever, EVER going to approach getting that kind of salary from anyone else. That means if we did buy him out it would be at, or darn close to, his current salary. That provides zero cap relief for us. The $33 million would be on our books anyway.
In the end this trade shows how the Blazers felt about Zach as much as anything. They will not say it, nor should they, but they wanted him gone. It wasn't on-court, it wasn't off-court, it was just everything. This trade was the equivalent of the last scene in the mob move Casino where they take Joe Pesci's character out to the cornfield and show him the business end of the baseball bat (and the convenient hole they pre-dug for him).
I suspect this means that the New York fans who were on their feet cheering tonight will find many of the same flaws in Zach's game and demeanor as the years go by. Remember a couple of things when Zach is having a great season next year. One, the Blazers' staff don't seem like bad judges of character. Two, unless there's major incentive leopards seldom change their spots. Multi-million dollar contracts and all the shots you can hoist don't provide very good incentive.
We should also take a moment to feel sorry for Freddie Jones. He gave up a year off of his contract to come back to Portland and play. Half a season later...boom. He's gone. At least this proves that our new GM isn't a slave to sentiment and is able to make tough decisions. Some rumors say New York will just buy out Jones and Dickau. I hope Freddie ends up in a good place if that's the case.
Transitioning back to the draft in general one of the things you see as you look over the roster is that the moving probably isn't done. Assuming we re-sign Ime and Outlaw we have twelve people under contract already. (That counts Francis and Frye.) Oden is a lock for thirteen. Even with the Europeans (including Freeland) staying in Europe that's still a pretty tight roster squeeze, especially if we want to add another veteran somewhere. It seems likely somebody else will yet move this summer. There have been hints that a small forward deal is still in the offing, perhaps including Francis. (That would make me happy.) It could be that Jack, Przybilla, or Webster might still be changing addresses. We won't know for a while.
I'm hopeful that some of our later round picks could pan out. There are some pretty nice names in there...some of which appeared to be coveted pre-draft. Maybe they could be moved or maybe they could play. It seems like we did pretty well with our non-Oden picks.
I don't think this draft answered the question of whether our staff is too in love with wheeling and dealing. At some point we'll become known as the Whitsitts of the draft if we're this active every year. However we didn't appear to overspend for anything this year and we did get some players we liked so I don't see any problems. We're pretty much out of major players available for dealing and we're likely to have much more modest pick resources next year so that draft should be pretty indicative.
In the end I don't feel quite as happy as I want to because that New York deal just kind of shocked and drained me. But my brain knows I should be happier and I'm certain I will be once I see these players hit the floor. That's not too long now, as Summer League starts next week. That will be the next step in our off-season journey together and I'll be there for every game offering you the best details and information I can. I do take requests if there's something you'd like me to look out for in particular.
Oh...last thing... Even though I sound critical of the Zach deal (or at least semi-stunned about it) I do think Kevin Pritchard has earned more than enough rope for me to say, "OK, I'm going with this and seeing where it leads" instead of jumping all over it. I think Blazer fans in general are a little gun-shy from past years. When you've fallen off a horse a dozen times you tend to gasp when your trusty steed steps in a gopher hole whether that's a big deal or not. KP and company will just have to understand that and grin and bear it. On the other hand we have to understand that our brilliant staff didn't get dumb overnight. They know more about all of this than we do. In some way this was the best deal for Zach and the best move for the team. Even if we don't see how we pretty much have to trust in that for now. And even if it does turn out to have been a mistake in the end (and I'm not saying it will be) every staff makes them. At this point all the evidence tells me I'd rather have a mistaken Pritchard than a lot of dead-on GM's in this league. And I'm actually encouraged that the staff was willing to make a less popular, less sexy move that they thought was right. After all, if they weren't willing to do that we might be putting up with Adam Morrison's God-awful hairdo 82 games a year. (Between him, Joakim Noah, and Drew Gooden we have a decent start for the all-grotesque hair team. We just need to find some guards.)
I hope you enjoyed draft night. On to Summer League!
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
0 recs |
61 comments
Comments
Great sum up
I'd like to comment on the Steve Francis concerns.
As far as I know he has no off-the-court problems. He butted heads with Van Gundy in Houston, refused to re-enter a game while in Orlando. In New York he couldn't co-exist with Marbury and he wasn't happy.
Now all this isn't great but it's not like the mere prescence of Francis is going to poison our locker room.
In fact maybe I'm being incredibly optimistic but I do think there is a small chance that Francis could turn his career around in a new setting with new opportunities.
After a year of rotting on the Knicks bench he might be more energized here. He could easily beat out Jack and Sergio.
by jayseyfield on
Jun 28, 2007 11:37 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I would love that
Listen up, people--this is a LONG TERM APPROACH. Champions think long term, perpetually mediocre teams think short-term.
by jamon51 on
Jun 29, 2007 9:56 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good write up Dave
But I guess I'll just have to be patient and wait to see what happens.
by junit3123 on
Jun 28, 2007 11:37 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
..and adieu to the '07 draft
Thanks for all the hard-out typing on Draft night. You really did Blazer Nation proud.
I have no doubt we'll have plenty more to digest and discuss as the summer rolls on - and probably sooner rather than later.
by iCollective on
Jun 28, 2007 11:39 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
excellent casino analogy, Dave
by sergioFTW on
Jun 28, 2007 11:42 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
KP says
http://blog.oregonlive.com/blazers/2007/06/postdraft_press_conference_aud.html
by howlingfantods on
Jun 28, 2007 11:48 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Very well-writ, Dave.
I do believe that Pritchard has earned MORE than enough leeway for Blazers fans to sit back and say, "Hey, I'm willing to see where this goes."
I, for one, wouldn't be terribly opposed to keeping both Francis and Frye. Frye automatically becomes the top backup for both Aldridge AND Oden, and will do so admirably off the bench. That is a LOADED front line, and everyone knows their roles, which would not have been the case had Randolph been retained.
As for Francis, I'm clinging to the pipe dream that he can serve as a change-of-pace guard off the bench for Brandon Roy. Much like Nick Van Exel was for the season-and-a-half he spent in Portland, Francis can run with the second unit, drain threes, and spearhead the run-n-gun second unit with Sergio Rodriguez. Worst case scenario, he rots on the bench and serves as an expiring contract down the line. Randolph's four-year terrible contract just became Stevie Franchise's two-year terrible contract.
And his two-year terrible contract might just become Shawn Marion's long-term max deal. Who knows?
by trevor on
Jun 28, 2007 11:49 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ya beat me to it on the marion thing
by SpyderRyder on
Jun 29, 2007 12:18 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
terrific summary
I think it was a great draft: Oden, obviously, some real steals in the second round, and stashing some pretty good talent in Europe (another good lesson learned from the Spurs). The trade was disappointing, and really put a damper on the night for me, but on the other hand, it's apparently not complete yet. Just gotta keep telling myself for ten more days, we've got KP now, not Patterson, not Nash, not Trader Bob.
by abdelnaby on
Jun 28, 2007 11:49 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Francis
by greasytrail on
Jun 28, 2007 11:54 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The fact it is Steve Francis
That said, I am going to follow trevor's example and think positive thoughts.
by timg56 on
Jun 29, 2007 12:04 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Correction
by howlingfantods on
Jun 29, 2007 12:05 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Future Trade(s)
by riles44 on
Jun 29, 2007 12:06 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Channing Frye
Randolph wasn't attractive enough to land us a marque player such as the guy from the Wiz. This move showed me how loyal Paul Allen is to this team and the fanbase. They found a way to make it work. We get cap releif from the buyout of francis when another team offers him a deal. We only have to buyout one year as the last is a player option. Maybe I am being too optimistic. I am not one of those guys that will miss Dickau or Fred Jones. I loved this move it was a no brainer and an A+ effort.
Did we get that forward from the suns? What is James' role?
by irishda on
Jun 29, 2007 12:34 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
James Jones
It looks like James Jones is coming to town. Get ready for some leg kicks ala Reggie Miller.
by jonestr on
Jun 29, 2007 12:14 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Trades
Greg O.- Welcome to Portland, to the Rose Garden, to BlazerMania. We will cheer you on and support you in your quest for the big win and all the littler ones along the way. It will be so much fun!!
Freddie J.- The bereavement begins for us who cheered for you at U of O and are now so incredibly bummed to see you go. Is there any chance one of the newer picks could be substituted? Freddie's was such a small piece of the salary cap and he was such a great assist man from the bench...
Kevin P.- You are the best! You are the wheeler dealer king and a great partner to Paul A. to get the biggest bang for the Blazer buck. I can only adore a fiscally responsible management that arranges for the salary availability to re-sign the great players which the lottery and the trades have sent to our team. This is a wonderful security for the fans. I wish there was some special way for us to acknowledge and thank you for your contributions. Like Tom Peterson and Scott Thomason whose images needed no words, your image could be marketed somehow in the Rose Garden like above a concession stand in which a mark up subsidized a foundation grant in your honor. One last thought though- Please, keep Travis Outlaw on our team!!!!
Blazer Management- Thank you for the draft day celebration in the Rose Garden. Thanks for the free parking and for the free arena entry too. It was a wonderful thankyou for the fans. We really felt like a valuable part of the process.
Zach R.- Best of luck to you. It has been our joy to watch you play and especially to see you lead the younger players. They are better players, more able to stand up to opponents for the respect due them, and more able to see their leadership role as players for having played with you. With many thanks, we will say goodbye to you. I am pleased that the Knicks are excited to get you. I predict you may grow in your ability to share the ball and to contribute to more styles of play. That will please us even more.
by ladygonegrey on
Jun 29, 2007 12:15 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thank you Dave,
I am dumbfounded by the NY trade, and astonished about how quickly my sense of happiness and hope turned to confusion and despair (which is probably too extreme of a word for this circumstance). I physically felt a hollowness in my mid section, like I had just been dumped.
We all believe in KP, but this makes me wonder how much of this trust is just wishful thinking. Hopefully there is more to this to come, or at least eventually an honest explanation.
Maybe when we were all writing about our need to trade Zach for an SF, he thought we meant Steve Francis.
Besides the betrayal of the character issue w/ Francis, I feel that there was a betrayal of Freddy. Probably not a healthy business or team building perspective.
As far as the rest of the draft went, you are right, I am ecstatic about our future team.
On a side note, I thought it looked extremely phony when ESPN was showing the Blazer war room right after our 2nd pick, someone realized that the camera was on them, at which point they all stood up and clapped and cheered.
by crakarjack on
Jun 29, 2007 12:17 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah
Now if we end up keeping Francis, he comes in here, and he's even more of a dimwad poopstick than Zach was then we have a right to hold management (at least verbally) accountable. And at that point I wouldn't be shy about calling it a mistake. But we don't know how this will pan out yet and that means the best course is probably optimism until proven otherwise.
--Dave
by Dave on
Jun 29, 2007 12:21 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What's the worst Francis
Francis being a newcomer won't have that kind of power. Plus he has no off-the-court issues as I recall. I mean what's he going to do, skip a game and go to a SuperBowl?
by jayseyfield on
Jun 29, 2007 12:28 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No
If he doesn't do that he's going to languish on the bench and be completely unproductive and maybe a distraction.
Those have been the two choices throughout his career, which is why a guy of his (once) immense talent has been bounced around and reviled so much.
--Dave
by Dave on
Jun 29, 2007 12:31 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
don't expect
I still think he's traded or bought out. Even if it costs us the exact same amount of money cap room, it frees up a roster space.
by matthewcc on
Jun 29, 2007 6:16 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What happened before
by crakarjack on
Jun 29, 2007 12:33 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Excellent Job...
- Drafting Greg Oden put in place the most crucial piece of the Blazers Core.
- Sending Zbo on his way was the most logical step in adding the final pieces. The Price; ask me in two years and I can tell you...until then, all is Just speculation.
- For those of you who are bummed about the above mentioned trade...hrmmm...seem to remember those same voices singing the Praises of KP last week, preaching patience and having a wait and see attitude...Need I say anymore?
by coastrider on
Jun 29, 2007 12:18 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The key question is
We have to understand that for the club this trade was not as much about what we got as what we purged (Zach and the mistake of his extra-long contract). Darius Miles is now the last holdover (financially anyway) from the hard times.
I don't blame anybody for being apprehensive. I was/am too. But a little time is needed before we start keel-hauling people. It may just work out. (As long as we're not depending on Stevie Franchise to turn over a new leaf.)
--Dave
by Dave on
Jun 29, 2007 12:28 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow
If 'character' and 'culture' come out of KPs mouth more so than Krispy Kremes go into DM's gut, how in the heck did the folks not see this coming?
I agree that Zach has had a nice statistical run, but he did so on a horrible squad, full stop. One gone, one more to go.
by dcblazer on
Jun 29, 2007 1:24 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think you misunderstand,
by crakarjack on
Jun 29, 2007 8:36 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
for once, i think canzano actually gets one right
Even KP himself said yesterday during the press conference that he doesn't know whether Franchise will dawn a Blazer jersey. Sometimes a clean break from the past like this provides the additional incentive to the young players as well as demonstrates a degree of trust from management in their capabilities.
Though a player-player comparison makes the trade look lopsided (in NYs favor), when factoring all of the indirect impacts associated with it, I believe we still come out on top.
by dcblazer on
Jun 29, 2007 10:25 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I was intially horrified
by JPop on
Jun 29, 2007 12:32 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The other trade
From Mike Barrett's blog:
"Now, there was one other move you didn't hear about, and it won't be made official for about a week. The Blazers, in conjunction with the trade to New York, used a trade exception to purchase the Fernandez pick (which you did hear about) and will also acquire Phoenix's James Jones."
by greasytrail on
Jun 29, 2007 12:34 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i don't understand the reaction
it was a fantastic draft. that we got rudy fernandez and josh mcroberts in addition to oden was incredible. those who have not seen mcroberts play will be very pleasantly surprised. we were very very lucky he was still around.
there evidently may need to be a buyout in order to get fernandez free of his team in spain; i hope that can be settled and he comes over this year. (kopponen i think needs more time.)
we needed to get rid of zach and we did. i don't think we have to worry about nate or kp and how they will deal with stevie f.
channing frye was touted as rookie of the year material not long ago. i have the feeling though that he'll be traded.
the blazers are in awfully good shape. it'll be interesting to see who the alleged sf incoming will be.
thenceforward, everyone on the roster can compete to play.
by ignacio on
Jun 29, 2007 12:48 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I dunno
I can't imagine Francis playing for us, but you're right, a buyout doesn't make sense either. There's no way he'll agree to it knowing that he won't make more than 3-4 million on the open market. I just find it extremely hard to believe that Randolph wasn't worth at least a draft pick, and if not that, some immediate cap relief?? Is his value really that low? I'd like to see what KP does with this "trade for a SF" thing. This incoming SF better be decent, otherwise this trade is ridiculous. If this is what Randolph's value truly was now (it seems like absolute rock bottom), then why couldn't we wait a little longer and see if things would change a little. I'm sure we could have pulled the trigger on a BS deal for an over the hell player with a non-expiring max contract anytime. It doesn't seem like a deal that HAD to be made now, it's not like they were even offering up a draft pick. In other words, it doesn't seem like a deal that's "too good to pass up". I'm sure the knicks would have done this same deal in a month's time, as i'm sure no one else would touch francis' contract.
On a brighter note, I remember thinking Frye was going to be a very good player after his rookie year. He put up a very very respectable 12/7 in just 24 minutes a game. His numbers dipped a little this year, not sure why. At this point, i hope he's not the one traded, only because he's the only player of any value that we got out of this deal. If we trade him for James Jones (i think that's what i've read here), i think I would officially be in depression mode. Trading Randolph for Frye + non-immediate cap relief is just a hard pill to swallow. If it ends up being Zach for Jones + non-immediate cap relief....
I think i'm in the extreme minority in that I'm not 100% convinced LMA will succeed to the extent that we think he will. Channing frye is a prime example, he came back down to earth and now no one views him as anything special. I hope that's not the case. It's just that a vast majority of LMA's success came at the end of what was a worthless season under zero pressuure. I'm not sure how he will hold up over the course of 82 games. Keeping Randolph would have allowed us to see if LMA truly is the real deal, and then deal Randolph accordingly. We know have places a great great deal of responsibility on LMA, let's hope he pans out.
I'm waiting to see what the final version of this deal is....(i'm even more amazed that we threw in Nichols, who looked like he wasn't half bad)
by ssa400 on
Jun 29, 2007 12:58 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
My Randolph Perspective
I won't.
by tssbro on
Jun 29, 2007 1:23 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cap Space
by riles44 on
Jun 29, 2007 9:04 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Another way
by greasytrail on
Jun 29, 2007 12:58 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Must go to bed....
Career averages: 566 games, 5.6 RPG, 6.1 APG, 1.5 SPG, 18.4 PPG
I still doubt he'll ever put on a Blazers jersey.
by greasytrail on
Jun 29, 2007 1:09 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
my first thought
indiana's sf is danny granger, who averaged 13.9 and shot decent percentages across the board.
just a thought.
by ignacio on
Jun 29, 2007 1:37 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Who could this be?
by iCollective on
Jun 29, 2007 2:03 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Here's the quote from Quick's story
So it was really a foregone conclusion that Zach was gonzo. Let the speculation begin!
I think it has to be one of two players - only two have the clout right now. Aldridge or Roy. The first thing I thought of when I read this was Roy. Whoever it was, thank you!
by leeroyjenkins on
Jun 29, 2007 7:24 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
agreed.
by blazerbrads1 on
Jun 29, 2007 11:08 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bad Guy??
I am willing to wait out and see what further happens. But right now KP took a big hit in my book. But I will wait it and out and hopefully he changes my mind. I just hate the fact I feel like I do on a day we drafted Greg F***ING Oden. My favorite player.
I'll give you time KP to prove me wrong. You obviously deserve it. I hope you know what you are doing. I just hate feeling like I do on a day we drafted our franchise player.
Love yeah ODEN!!! MUAHH!
by JBlazer on
Jun 29, 2007 3:04 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
not a bad guy...
by tssbro on
Jun 29, 2007 7:11 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the good and the bad
Wouldn't have happened if he drafted Durant. we could've kept Zach for at least a 1/2 season, and gotten more at the trade deadline.
You gotta live with the good and bad of drafting Oden.
Let's just hope he trades Francis to get a great SF. I'm just worried about what prospect he's going to have to include in that deal (i.e Jarrett Jack)
by jm on
Jun 29, 2007 8:52 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Its a plus plus
by TearsforDuckworth on
Jun 29, 2007 9:46 AM PDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
no time to read
I am VERY excited to be a Blazers fan again. This is the first time in a very long time that i've felt this way. I cannot wait until the start of the season to see how well this team meshes and what they are truly capable of. I am saddened by the loss of Zach, but i feel it was inevitable. I just wish we could have got more than an overpriced bag of potato chips for him. I'm not sure how Isiaah took KP for a ride like that, but he did. Kudos to him.
My second thought is this: As much as i enjoyed watching the draft, that Jackass Stephen A. Smith ruined it for me. That guy is like nails on a chalkboard to me. I don't care one bit about what he has to say, or the way he has to say it. It would have been a perfect broadcast crew if they fired him and put Dan Patrick in his place. (where was Dan, by the way?)
Overall, it was a great night. Bring on Summer League! Our Summer League team could possible make a VERY DEEP RUN in the NCAA Tourney we are that good....GO BLAZERS!!!
by saregister on
Jun 29, 2007 6:33 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Steve Francis' final stats
April 17th- 26 pts, 4 rebs, 3 assists
April 18th- 24 pts, 8 rebs, 3 assists
He was playing for a contract, much as he will be in Portland. Still, I hope we package him in a deal for a SF like Marion.
by mjm6783 on
Jun 29, 2007 7:39 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
How much...
This is not over yet and the proverb about 'the last laugh' keeps coming to mind...
It's our time, folks. Enjoy the ride!
by Dr Dave on
Jun 29, 2007 8:23 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
dave
by fatty on
Jun 29, 2007 8:25 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
GM's toughest job
- Know when this is the year of the old saying, "Better a year too early, than a year too late."
- Use your strengths to deal with your weaknesses.
- Make decisions that could cost you your job.
When I look at this move, I see Billy Beane like qualities. I think the undervalued (moneyball) commodity here is that management should act whenever possible to create flexibility against the cap. Limiting the impact of losses is just as important as maximizing the impact of gains.
Right now, I'm trusting KP is spending Allen's money at it's maximum value.
by eknpdx on
Jun 29, 2007 8:39 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Mov'in on Up
!!!!!GO BLAZERS!!!!
by Goob on
Jun 29, 2007 8:50 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
In two years, the people who hate the Zach trade
by leeroyjenkins on
Jun 29, 2007 9:27 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
Those draft picks last night were fantastic. KP... you've done it again.
by MattD on
Jun 29, 2007 10:01 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Francis buyout
by Monochromo on
Jun 29, 2007 10:14 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not All is Lost
The Randolph trade had to happen on draft day because the Blazers used the trade exception from the NY deal to acquire Fernandez. Tied up in the whole thing was sending Nichols and getting a future second back.
In essence, the Blazers traded Randolph for Frye, Rudy Fernandez, James Jones, and cap relief.
For Everyone:
Frye will be an effective 10/5 guy off the bench, and may turn into even more. He is only a 3rd-year player, after all. James Jones is filler, but Fernandez will be very good in two or three years.
Biggest of all is the impact that not having Randolph on the roster will mean. I've argued in the past that Randolph's 23/10 stat was worth a LOT on the trade market. I was wrong - not Pritchard. We didn't get talent in return for Randolph, but if that is what you were looking for, your expectations were unrealistic. In the end, we didn't just dump Z-Bo.
Cap relief, a role-player that could turn into a little more, and a potential backcourt starter is not a bad haul in and of itself. But when you factor in the positive effect on other team players, the positive effect on the team's offensive style of play and overall team defensive improvement, then you have to consider this trade a significant success.
Think about that for a moment:
Without Zach Randolph's 23/10 numbers, the Blazer's should be able to score more and give up less - and his former teammates will be happier doing it. How is that not a good trade?
A few of you (ok, more than a few) lament the loss of low-post scoring. However, let's face it: the most frustrating element of the Blazer's game last year was watching Randolph hold the ball or the big stiff (Magloire) camp out, wait for the ball, and make a 10-second move to the hoop. This style of play maximized Randolph and Magloire, but minimized the rest of the team. Now, we no longer have either of the low-post isolation stagnaters to shorten the shot clock.
Neither will the Blazers play a 3-man fast break defense. Finally, the Blazers have the right pieces in place to play an up-tempo game without conceding an advantage.
The other element to the Randolph trade amounts to a management confession that the Blazers are not pushing for playoffs in 2007/2008. If they do make it, great for experience. If they don't, no big. Randolph represented more than 23/10 stats - he was the most experienced fixture in the lineup. In effect, our management staff is telling us that there is no point in paying for talent that won't take us to the promised land.
by blacknoise on
Jun 29, 2007 10:38 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
A couple years ago the Knicks wouldn't trade Frye
But there is something else happening, KP hints at another trade looming. I wonder if Frye or Francis are part of that.
by leeroyjenkins on
Jun 29, 2007 11:15 AM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Josh McRoberts has Played with Greg Oden
by ladygonegrey on
Jun 29, 2007 3:26 PM PDT
reply
actions
0 recs

















