Who is this pick really for: the media or the fans?
Since the very first time that I watched the Portland Trailblazers play, I have been captivated by the skills that these grown men had. I lived my life assuming that the Blazers would never lose, as long as they played to the best of their abilities. But because the NBA consists of teams that have men, just as the Blazers did, it was never with certainty that the red, black and silver would always come away with a victory.
I guess this is what actually made my fascination with the NBA that much more intense. In the NBA, any team could beat any other team on any given night. Not knowing who was going to win, added a mix of excitement, anticipation and relief or failure depending on the outcome of the game. But most of all, it left me with a desire to watch the next one to see what would happen. Back then, winning and losing meant something more than revenue shares and media attention. It meant that for a day, we could relish in a victory over our opponent, while anticipating the challenge of our next.
But now, in today's im"media"te journalism, there is not time to relish in any success. The point of winning is no longer the enjoyment of success or to be embraced by the moment. In this race to determine the winner before the game is even played, leads to open criticism when teams fail to meet the media's expectations. Analysts and sports writers urge fans to forget team mantras, franchise goals and player development, and sway the public to press for immediate goals, even if unattainable. You can't report on tomorrow's win unless it happens. That doesn't stop analysts and commentators from patting themselves on the back when they finally get one of their guesses right, or condemning the team that made their analysis look silly.
When a player makes the right statement, the media gives him the thumbs up and declares that any GM would be an idiot to pass on such a guy. If another player doesn't smile when the cameras are in his face, it becomes a potential knock against his character. What's worse, the fans that look to the media for objective journalism are somewhat duped into thinking that this assessment is made by an individual with respectable knowledge of the league and the individual being scrutinized.
And so begins that power play between franchises looking for what is best for their organizations, and the media trying to create the news, instead of reporting it. As fans of the game, we suffer most.
After digesting the long tributes about player potential and the ad nauseam comparisons to former and current players, fans are left with little to look forward to. It's as if the media has forced the fans to consume all hope and joy up front leaving empty wells, once filled with fan enthusiasm.
Last year, the Portland Trailblazers brought a little suspense back into our hearts. During the last half of the season, we had surpassed the expectations set out by the franchise management. Win or lose, we could enjoy the game for what it was, an uncertainty that could be defined as a win or loss, rather than a success or a failure. Portland fans were pulled to the edge of their seats, hoping that our guys were going to be able to gut it out against a more experience team, instead of being repulsed by a failure to produce. Once again, we are able to embrace the team for what it is: a group of young guys that faced the league to the best of their abilities and proved that with hard work and the support of fans, basketball can be fun and exciting again, without having to base all of the success on the total number of wins.
There was once a time when the NBA wasn't just about the money. It was about being the best of the best. Wins came with desire and desire came from wanting to win. I want to be captivated again, surprised and held is suspense as the team makes its way towards the ultimate goal of winning a championship. Media speculation has put a tainted skew on the success of incoming players. If a player has success, it is still considered a failure in comparison to individuals who have attained greater success.
How many knocks went against Magic or Bird for not winning as many championships as Russell? What about MJ and Kobe for not averaging as many points as Wilt. When these young guys come into this league, the first thing some analyst does is try to slap on a label and set ultra high expectations for these players, all in the name of being the first to classify this guy or that guy.
These players only become busts after failing to meet the expectations placed on them by the media. Teams like the Blazers, Spurs and the Bulls ignore that type of hype, choosing players that they feel fit their team concept of culture. I'm sure that KP would have preferred to keep out of the spotlight during this decision making process and then address all the hype after the fact. But let's face it the media wants to feed the public. I consider the speculation and analysis more like candy than a nutritional snack. Too much candy will make you overweight and unhealthy. It's hard for fans to break that cycle, with the immediate availability of sugar laced rumors and juicy tidbits of smart sounding hypothesis.
With Oden as our selection, anything less than a finals run in two years will mean a slight against the franchise. Even if we win, it will be expected and some of the luster would be lost on the "Eventuality" factor.
But with Durant, there is an obvious uncertainty about the success that he could bring to the team. One of the elements that made the '77 team such an icon of NBA magic is that they were not expected to win it all. And when they did, they did it as a team. This only amplified the joy of success.
Now we can get into debates about whether or not if Oden is selected that this will become Oden's team, or if Durant comes to this team this will become Durant's team.
The ultimate question is: who will complete this team and make the Portland Trailblazers an exciting, successful and determined team.
And, when you close your eyes and picture each of these guys filling a role on this squad, if you still can't decide which player will bring the Blazers the most glory, then you may be just where you need to be. Getting caught up in the excitement of not knowing the future and sitting back, letting the players lead us to victory, not the media.
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
I read all of that
Know this, though: media speculation and fan support won't have anything to do with the way KP makes his decision.
Perhaps consuming less sports media might be the trick, eh? One could speculate themselves into madness if one were so inclined.
by Samuelson on Jun 25, 2007 12:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
One of the things I like about Pritchard
--Dave
by Dave on Jun 25, 2007 1:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Okay, here is the summation...
How much of a let down is it then? We're counting rings before we've even put this guy on our team.
How long will it take before the media declares Oden a flop if we only win 37 games next year?
Winning isn't guaranteed. Proof: when we had Sheed, Damon, Bonzi, and Pippen, we were projected to take it all. And from a record standpoint, the case looked justified. But what happened? A game 7 collapse and a lengthy media backlash which villanized just about every player on our team.
You can't tell me that the fans can just block out all of the criticism placed on the players, the coach and even the franchise itself.
It's one thing to report that Damon got busted for pot. Its another thing to make it a story that lasted a year.
Sheed had a bad attitude on the court and that brought some bad light to the team. On court actions like Sheed's merited the constant critism by the media. But when Damon and Sheed were busted on the way back from a Seattle game with Pot, again report it, but don't drag it out for a year or longer, just because you don't feel like reporting on anything else.
My point is this: The media should report the news, analysts should analyze the news and just don't let the line between reporting the news and creating the news shrink even further.
I want to go back to the good ol' days when we'd watch a Blazer game, we'd expect to win, but we were never sure if we would. Where tough losses could be viewed as eye-openers, rather than end all statements about the quality of the team.
And with the Media in a sure fire hurry to proclaim the next big thing, why play into that?
Oden vs Durant.
Is either really bigger than this team? If, whoever we pick in the draft is really bigger than the Portland Trailblazers, then does it really matter if this is Portland's team, or if this is the Chicago Bulls? Not really.
But, if you find that only one these guys does not see himself as a greater sum that the team, you take that guy.
So when there is talk about his player bringing championships, or that player being the greatest, you could make the arguement that the guy bringing the championships is the best prospect, but I have one more example to offer up my point.
The Miami Heat. Does anyone care that they won the championship 2 years ago? I think more people cared about the Pistons winning it all a few years ago more than they did when Miami did the same thing. Why? Because that team transplanted a proven dominant center and took it all. The Pistons were slowly built based on team chemistry and patience. In the end though, there were not any players on that team bigger than the team itself.
It took Jordan seven years of struggling to finally win it all. Once he left the game for good, the fall of the Bulls became painful for any fan to watch. But we still remember fondly the Jordan Era and even if we aren't Bulls fans, we can still appreciate the greatness of those teams.
If Portland wins the Championship within the next couple of years, then great, Oden or Durant was as good a hyped. But if it takes longer than expected, will the media be as patient as us fans, when it comes to team success, or will it end up like when the last Blazer team to have any success fell short, and spew the constant barrage of sensationalized negativity brought about by analysts and sports writers looking to create the news rather than report it?
Loving the Portland Trailblazers is more than admiring the guys on the team. It's about the entity as a whole, rather than the success of a few parts.
I've agreed with KP with just about everything that he has said. But I don't consider Oden or Durant a savior. We were on our way to success with or without either one of these guys. I don't consider this pick to be bigger than the Portland Trailblazers or the City of Portland.
As great as it feels to be sitting on top of the world, there is always the media presence, with enough control to knock the franchise from that perch. But being mindful and humble about the direction of the franchise will protect organization from the potential backlash from failing to meet the media's over-hyped expections.
by rpxxxiv on Jun 25, 2007 3:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
More people
Also most casual fans only appreciated Jordan, not the Bulls teams. Yes that's unfair especially to Pippen (who was criminally underappreciated) but that's how it is.
Teamwork is great but I hate how pundits nag and nag about teamwork.
The coaches and players can concentrate on teamwork, but as fans we want to be entertained as well not focus on some kind of Zen purity of a perfect basketball organism.
by jayseyfield on Jun 25, 2007 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Question then Who would you rather watch?
The point about the Heat is that people were more eager to move on to the next season, following their championship run than they were when the Pistons won.
And as with the following year, the Heat failed to compete anywhere near the level that they did during that championship year.
But teams like the Bulls that spent their time crashing into super powers like the Pistons and Cavs back in the late eighties were rewarded with a much broader fanbase (Bandwagon fans included), than say the Miami team, who cast out a few solid guys and brought back Shaq.
Fans were celebrating the wins, but jumped shipped as soon as it was evident that there was little substance to the victory.
If Portland won the Championship next year, would it be as sweet as if Portland won it three years from now. I personally would like to think it was the blend of talent that won us the championship and not just one player coming into this league.
But again, my point is about the media hype that is placed on these guys and how quickly the media driven "Public" opinion can sway, in just a short amount of time, due to failed expectations within media established time frames.
Brian Hendrickson feels what I'm saying. I'd rather us with because we came together as a team, rather than because one guy came in and made us better.
Of course, I also believe is shorter contracts and less money to build team success. Players will get more out of endorsements playing for a winner, than they would by taking the max and crippling a team's success.
by rpxxxiv on Jun 25, 2007 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
bottom line
by fatty on Jun 26, 2007 9:39 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs





















