Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Terry Collins, David Wright, And The Mets/Brewers Kerfuffle

Quick Chat Recap 5/31/07 Part 2

Here's the second part our recap of Oregonlive's Quick Chat hosted by Casey Holdahl.  As always this is a paraphrase of the questions and responses.  You can listen to the entire chat here.  

I'm having you click the "read more" thing so it doesn't completely bury the other posts today.

Star-divide

Oregonian Beat Writer Jason Quick joins the chat.

Q:  Any news from the Orlando Pre-Draft Camp?

A:  Today was media availability for the projected lottery pick.  I've been doing this four years now and the media contingent was 3-4 times larger than previous years.  Everyone wanted to talk to Oden and Durant.  It was my first meeting with Durant.  He's a cool guy.  He's very humble and soft spoken...much more reserved than Greg Oden.  Greg Oden has a personality that takes over the room.  They anticipated the media rush this year so they did it differently...bringing in Durant for 30 minutes and Oden for 30 minutes.  At the other tables were other guys like Joakim Noah, Corey Brewer, Mike Conley, and all that.  Oden owned the room with his personality.  Durant is much more serious...basketball is his world.  That's all he really talks about.  Durant is 6'10"--6'9+1/2" without shoes--and he said he weighed himself this morning and it's 219.  You'll see him listed mostly at 225 but he says he's never been that big.  He would like to improve his upper body strength.  One thing I noticed about Durant is he has absolutely HUGE hands, the biggest I've ever seen.  They're really long.

Greg Oden revealed he'll be coming to Portland for interviews and workouts on June 19-20.  Durant didn't know when he was scheduled.  I know he'll be in there that week but I don't know whether it will be before or after.  My guess would be after but I don't know that for sure.

These lottery picks haven't done their testing yet so we don't know how they did on the bench press or vertical leap or any of that stuff.  They're going to do that tomorrow.  I hope to have a report on that.  I am really curious to see what Durant can do on the bench press.  I think they have them bench press 185 pounds and see how many times they can do it.  Last year I think Lamarcus only did it 8 or 9 times and that was a question mark.  I'm curious to get those results.

Whoever they pick Portland will grow to like both of these guys.  They're likeable guys and good kids.  I don't think you'll hear about them getting in trouble.  I don't think Portland can go wrong in this.  But I think they'll pick Oden. I think he's just too impressive.  From the workouts I've heard he's been doing in Indianapolis he's just a monster.  He's been working a lot on his explosion and on his dribbling.  He says he's probably worked most on his dribbling and he says, "I have to get a new shirt once I complete my dribbling drills because I'm working so hard and producing so much sweat."  Both guys are still working out hard.  It's going to be interesting but I think Oden will be the pick.

Q:  How much does Greg Oden weigh?  The lottery sites have about a 50 pound discrepancy from site to site.

A:  I asked Durant straight up but I forgot to ask Oden.  They'll be measured and weighed tomorrow so I hope to have something then at the blog.

Q:   How much stock do NBA types put in measurables and how much do Kevin Pritchard and the Blazers' staff put in them?

A:  I think not much.  It didn't affect them with Lamarcus even though his bench press was among the lowest for people his size.  As it turns out Lamarcus is one of the best Blazers in the weight room and he's improved greatly in that area.  I don't think they'll be worried because both of these guys have great reputations for work-ethic.  I don't think they'll put much stock in it.  They've done enough homework and they have huge books on both of these guys.  I really think it will come down to the interviews...what Kevin will be able to glean when he meets them face to face and looks them in the eye.  That's another thing I've taken from both of these guys.  When they ask you a question they look you straight in the eye.  There were 20-30 people around each of these players and every time someone would ask a question both of these guys would look them in the eye.  That's the kind of thing that Kevin Pritchard likes.  Brandon Roy is very much like that.  I would love to be in those interviews and hear what Kevin Pritchard will ask both of these players.

Q:  How much stock will they put into the interviews?  If Kevin Durant has a much better interview than Greg Oden would that change the course of the pick?

A:  I think it could.  I think the interviews will be the most important factor in this.  Kevin Pritchard has gone as far as to say that.  That being said I think the physical talents of Greg Oden are too great.  I don't think the Blazers can pass up a guy like this. I think Nate McMillan is firmly in the Oden camp.  Even though Kevin Pritchard has in the past been a Durant guy I think he's coming to an understanding that this is too special of a talent to pass up on.

Of course almost every player gets pre-draft hype (remember Pervis Ellison and Kwame Brown?) but it's just hard not to get a tingly spine when you hear stuff like this.

Q:   Of the other players at camp has anyone stood out to you?

A:  It's hard because to be honest I didn't go to any of the games today.  They're playing the last two games right now and I spent all day at the media availability.  However I saw two of the three games yesterday.  The kid from Clemson, James Mays, who is a small power forward or small forward (he's about 6'9"), was very impressive.  He was quick jumping and getting back to his feet.  He's like a pogo stick.  I think there are players here who are going to be possible picks for the Blazers in the second round.  That's the great mystery right now...what the Blazers are going to do with the second round picks.  I think they're going to trade them or draft Europeans.  I don't see them bring in five rookies to camp.  Obviously Kevin Pritchard is getting a lot of play from other general managers.  He's holding different discussions with different teams--Seattle, Dallas, and Chicago.  Paxson was adamant about talking to Pritchard before he left last night.  I haven't touched base with Kevin since that talk and I don't expect him to tell me anyway.  But certainly they're getting a lot of interest.  I think they plan to be active.  Kevin gave a little hint that they're going into this draft planning to get multiple picks in the first round.  That tells you that he plans to be active.  I would fully expect the Blazers to pull something on draft night.

Q:  Will that move involve Blazer personnel already?

A:  Yes.  They'll look to get something high--3 to 11.  They'll look to fill a need:  small forward or point guard.  Conley is a potential.  Brewer is a potential.  It's something to keep your eye on.

It's going to take something special to move up into the top six.  Somehow I don't see that happening.  When you start getting near double digits I think people start asking whether they guy they're going to get will be able to develop into what Zach Randolph (and a young Zach Randolph at that) already is.  How many of those guys chosen 8-11 will score 24 points per game ever in their careers?  Such a deal seems doable.

Q:  Greg Oden mentioned wanting to play with Conley...

A:  I talked to Conley today.  He's being represented by his dad as well.  I asked him if he's told his dad to try and make that happen.  He said, "Yes, we've talked about it but I've kind of left it up to him.  But I've let him know that I think it would be neat."  I don't think the Blazers are putting too much stock in that.  It's been misrepresented that Greg Oden has been trying to force the Blazers' hand by getting them to try and get Conley.  It's not that situation at all.  Both players have simply said it would be nice to play together because they've shown they have a winning track record.  I don't think either player is trying to force anybody's hand.  I think the Blazers are trying to take it seriously and to explore whether it can happen.  Conley is a talented point guard.  I'm not so sure he has the NBA-ready jump shot but he can get by anybody.  I'm not sure that's where the Blazers are trying to go with that position.  They would probably like to have a veteran presence because ever since they've had Sebastian they've had young, inexperienced point guards.  I don't know that they'd want to go through that again. I think they want some stability at that position. I think the Blazers will pursue Steve Blake on the free agent market this year.  He'd be the perfect fit for this team.  He still lives in Portland and he wants to come back.  Obviously Kevin and Nate love him.  He'd fit what they could afford financially.  I think the Blazers will make a strong play to get Steve Blake.  And here's where winning the draft lottery comes into play.  You don't think he wants to play with Greg Oden?  That will be a great influence on his decision.  He's going to get a lot of offers.  Denver wants him.  Miami has been rumored to want him.  If he looks at Portland's situation the chances of him coming just increased.  They're going to be a better team and he'll get to play with the big guy.  That's where the Blazers become a more active destination for free agents.

I don't see anything wrong with what Oden and Conley said.  Any two friends would pretty much think wishfully about being able to stick together.  I'm sure they'll handle it if it doesn't happen.  I'm in the camp that thinks it probably shouldn't.  It's not so much because of contract issues or an assessment of Conley's talent but rather, "What happens if Conley is only good enough to be a practice squad player?  How does that friendship dynamic (or the locker room dynamic) change?"  There's no risk if they're on different teams.

Q:  Do you think the Blazers consider point guard a position of need even if they get a veteran?  What are the prospects for Conley?

A:  They're looking for experience at that position.  There are still doubts in the front office as to whether Jarrett Jack is a starting point guard.  Don't get me wrong, they like Jarrett and the progression he's made. Last season was solid--wasn't great, wasn't bad.  There are still questions in some people's minds as to whether Jarrett is ready to lead a team as a point guard.

Q:  What is the opinion of Jarrett's value around the league?

A:  He's well-regarded.  I don't think anyone would sell the farm to get him.  I don't want to plant any seed in people's minds that the Blazers are unhappy with him.  They're not...not even close.  What the Blazers are thinking is, "Is he ready right now to take on what has become added responsibility?"  They're going to be a greatly improved team next year.  Is Jarrett ready to step up and take that next step of leading that winning team?  It's a lot easier to be a point guard on a losing team.  The games aren't as close.  Jarrett is well regarded.  12.5 points and 5 assists is pretty decent for a second-year point guard.  If you look at the history of NBA point guards their greatest improvement is usually between the third and fourth years.  Gary Payton, John Stockton, and Steve Nash all struggled in their first two years.  Point guard is a very tough position to play as a youngster.  They're taking all that into consideration in his development.  He played pretty well but the stakes are raised now because the Blazers are going to be a better team.  Do you still want to risk having a guy growing in a position that's so important with the ball in his hands so much?  That's why they want to get a stabilizing, veteran force there.

This is where philosophy comes into play, and we've talked about this extensively here.  In my view you're in this game for one, overriding reason:  to win a championship.  Even if you're not there yet you're always building with an eye towards that.  It doesn't matter if you're on step 999 of 1000 or still on step 2, you make decisions based on that goal.  Therefore to my way of thinking as long as you think he has a chance to develop you don't worry as much about how Jarrett's growing pains are going to affect the bottom line this coming season (assuming he's not completely incompetent and ruining team development).  We'll be better but we're not going to win a championship this year no matter what point guard we bring in.  You want to worry about what kind of player Jarrett is going to be 2-3 years down the road when we start expecting to go deep in the playoffs.  You want to take the risk now when the consequences are the difference between the #6 and #9 spots in the West.  You don't want to take risks later when the consequences are falling short in a legitimate championship run.  This might allow a little more patience for Jarrett.  That "biggest leaps for young point guards come in seasons 3 and 4" thing that Jason mentioned really factors in.  I think you're willing to take less than optimum production this year if you think it could turn into optimum production when it matters most.

On the other hand some would say that winning the maximum number of games right now and making the playoffs again right now are the most important things.  I don't get that because I think you open yourself up to making a move that looks good right now but could cause regret later.  But if that's your thing, moving Jarrett becomes more of a viable prospect.

To me, yes...the stakes are raised somewhat this year.  But not that much.

Q:   What's Jarrett Jack's opinion on all of this?  Does he want to be a Blazer?

A:  No question.  He loves this team, his role, and his teammates.  Jarrett's pretty sensitive though.  He never let on last year but it bothered him a bit how gaga people were over Sergio.  Him being involved in these trade rumors bugged him also and I think Kevin Pritchard sensed that and that's why he called him recently.  But that being said, Jarrett is willing to take on competition.  He's a competitor.  He played in the ACC and that's a big matchup every night.  He's used to competition and he's welcome if they did bring in another guy like Conley or Blake.  He wouldn't back down or crawl into a shell.  But at the same time he's one of the more sensitive guys about how he's perceived.

I can almost guarantee you Jarrett is going to be fine no matter where he ends up.  He is not going to bust out of this league.  I see a 10-year plus career for him.  It's just a matter of where and in what capacity.

Q:   How about Zach's response to trade rumors?

A:  Zach understands it and realizes the talent level of Lamarcus Aldridge.  He understands the direction the Blazers want to go building around youth.  But he still thinks it could work and he's adamant about not wanting to be traded.  He likes it here in Portland and likes his teammates.  But at the same time he's very interested in trade rumors.  I think he would love to be traded to Chicago.  He brings it up all the time when I talk to him.  "What do you hear about Chicago?  I could do well there."  I don't think Zach is as sensitive as Jarrett.  I don't think this bugs him that much.  I think what does bug Zach is that he's not included in the glowing talk about the direction of the team.  If you listen Nate and Kevin rarely, if ever, mention Zach when they talk about the core.  It's always Brandon, Lamarcus, Jarrett, the number one pick.  I brought that up to Kevin and he says he knows.  He's tried to catch himself and bring up Zach more.  On ESPN the other day he purposely brought up Zach.  But Zach is very aware of that.  Zach points out how the team has never given him a bobblehead.  Towards the end of the year he was featured on the cover of Atomic Dog magazine.  He came and gave me a copy and some people from the PR department were there.  He said, "Look, I had to do that all myself.  Heaven forbid that the Blazers' PR department would promote me."  He's sensitive to how this team views him but at the same time I don't think he frets about his standing because he's confident about his standing and views himself as an elite player in the NBA.  And he probably should.  Those numbers...we can talk all we want about his poor defense and his less than desirable passing skills but the guy puts up numbers that very few players do.  Still the Blazers are a better team when Lamarcus starts at power forward.  When he started there he averaged around 21 and 9 which is comparable to Zach.  As a whole the team is better with Lamarcus than Zach.

I don't think there's any way you can enter next season with Lamarcus coming off the bench.  He's far too talented.  The longer you keep him from starting the more you stunt his growth and progression.  I think the Blazers will look to deal Zach.  Whether or not they'll find a suitor remains to be seen.  That's my biggest question seeing Kevin talk to John Paxson.  Chicago desperately needs somebody like Zach.  Zach has expressed interest and wouldn't mind playing for Chicago.   That was my first thought when I saw those two GM's talking together.  Keep in mind that Chicago has the #9 pick and that's one the Blazers would desire.

Q:  Let's say Pritchard and McMillan agree that Lamarcus should start.  Is there any way Zach comes off the bench?

A:  No...no way.

Q:  So he wants to be a Blazer but only as a starter?

A:  We've never broached the subject but that would just be...ridiculous.  If it happened that Zach, Lamarcus, and Greg Oden were on the same team they'd have Zach as the starting power forward and Oden as the center with Lamarcus backing them both.  They would find a way to get Lamarcus on the court for 25-30 minutes.  In the long run that would stunt his growth.  If you look back to past years any time that situation has happened--with Rasheed and Zach or Darius Miles and Shareef Adbur-Rahim--it doesn't bode well for the chemistry of the team.  Somebody's going to be unhappy.  Some players will think one guy should be playing, others the other one.  It's just a recipe for discontent.  It's happened so many times during my years covering this team:  Bonzi Wells and Steve Smith, Pippen and Bonzi, Derek Anderson and Bonzi, Ruben and DA and Bonzi.  It's happened so many times and it's never worked out.  That's something they have to consider.

That's an interesting point and one of the valuable things about having someone of Jason's perspective.  I've said before that if we have all three big guys the clock is ticking and it's a year, tops, before somebody moves.

One of the big pitfalls of starting Zach and Oden together is that Oden won't get much chance to show off his offense.

I don't know if Jason was mistaking Zach for Darius with the bobblehead thing above or not.  If not, apparently this is a very touchy subject for NBA players!

Also I understand Zach's feelings on the team promoting him but it's really a chicken-and-egg problem.  They can't promote him as the face of the franchise right now because of all the history--his and the team's.  Remember the year they did commercials with Ruben and DA?  Those were pretty much crapped on by the public at large and only served to confirm the team's poor image.  "This is the best they have to show us?"  Of course the Blazers were eager to re-brand with fresh, new faces when they came along.

Q:  So is there any urgency to moving Zach?

A:  Not right now.  Kevin has made that quite clear.  The only thing they're focusing on right now is the draft.  Once they figure out who to pick then they can start to devise their plan.  I still don't think they've decided.  I think they're leaning one way but I don't think they've decided.  Once they make that decision then they can move on and decided other moves.

Q:  Have you heard any scuttlebutt from other reporters about whether the Blazers should take Oden or Durant?

A:  Just about every beat writer comes up to me and says there's no way they're not taking Oden and they wonder why Portland's not just saying they're picking Oden.  I say they're not decided and they say, "Come on!"  It's unanimous they should select Oden.  That's the scuttlebutt.  Everyone in basketball circles believes that the Blazers are going to take and should take Oden.

Just a guess, but I'm thinking they're not saying they're taking Oden because then nobody else, including Durant, would give them the time of day after they did.

Q:  What was the response to the Kobe statements at the camp?

A:  It sent ripples throughout the whole camp.  Every respective beat writer went to their coach or GM and asked, "Would you be interested in Kobe?"  Some chose to answer, some did not.  Kevin Pritchard said he wasn't going to answer that because he has respect for Mitch Kupchak.  It certainly sent a ripple through the arena.

Q:  Do the Blazers have any interest?

A:  No.  I don't think he fits this culture.  It would change the whole dynamic of the team.  He plays the same position as Brandon Roy.  He wouldn't fit because then the Blazers would become about one player.  What they're trying to build is a team culture where it's not about one guy but about how the team operates as one.

Q:  What's on the horizon for you?

A:  I'll write a story on Durant for tomorrow's paper.  I'll watch all the games tomorrow and talk to Oregon's Aaron Brooks...get a recap of his draft camp.  I'll talk to his coach, Mark Aguirre, and try to get a sense of whether he'll be drafted.  If he does it'll be in the second round.  I talked to a few reporters who saw today's game and they said that Brooks had a hard time with his shot and he got his shot blocked three times in the lane.  When you get into this type of environment you really notice how small Aaron Brooks is.  You just wonder if he can make it at this level because of his size.  Small guys have made it in the league but they are few and far between.  That will be in Saturday's paper.

On Monday I'm going to write a story about the early years of Greg Oden.  He didn't start playing basketball until 4th grade and he was awful at first.  His AAU coach said it was like teaching a kindergartener to play basketball.  Oden told me that when he first started he didn't even know how many people were on a team.  He was very raw.  I talked to him and Conley about his early years and how he grew to be this player.  Conley said that people made fun of Oden early on because he was very tall and couldn't play.  But around his freshman year he started to blossom.  That will come out Tuesday.

My hopes are to go back to Indianapolis and watch Greg Oden do his workouts.  He's working with Ed Schilling who's a big-man coach.  I want to see his explosiveness and ball-handling skills.  I still have to clear that through his camp.  Greg is like, "You can come down...I'd love it!"  I hope to get more insight.  Early on I've tried to reveal what kind of person Greg is but now I want to get more into what kind of player he is and his skills and development.  From everything I've heard he's a different player than he was in college just because his wrist has healed.  Another thing he told me today was that the injury forced him to use his left hand a lot.  He shot free throws and even shot in games left-handed.  He said it's turned out to be a great skill.  He has an array of shots that he can get off with both hands.  Not a lot of big men can do that.  Another thing he's been working on is his Tim Duncan bank shot.  He watched Duncan on TV and he likes that shot.  He's been working on it.  He says his next few weeks will focus on his shot almost exclusively.  A lot of it early on was ball-handling and spin moves and explosiveness.  Now it will be his shot.

Also on June 8th the Blazers will bring in guys to work out.  It will mostly be second round type guys.  Kevin Pritchard has said that he can't get a lot of lottery players to come in because they're so booked with workouts.  They know Portland won't pick them number one.  That's a disadvantage because I still think they're intent on getting a second first round pick and they'd like to see guys like Brewer, Conley, Green, and Horford in person.  We'll cover those workouts.  They happen every day...only a couple of off days between June 8th and the draft.

Another interesting note:  Nate McMillan has been absent the entire week.  He stayed in Seattle to attend his son's graduation.  He has not seen any of these pre-draft workouts.

By the way...it's an interesting thing about the Blazers now.  If you step back and look a their front office:  Kevin Pritchard, youngest GM in the league, 39.  His assistant, Tom Penn, 39.  Michael Borne, the director of NBA scouting, 41.  Chad Buchanan, director of college scouting, 34.  Jason Phillipe, international scouting director, 37.  This has to be the youngest collection of front office personnel and scouting in the NBA.  It really fits the Blazers.  They're a young, growing group.  These guys all have new ideas with the computer database, the simulators they use.  It's a fresh-thinking, hip kind of group.  That's a neat thing for Portland.  They're a new age front office.  I don't think a lot of teams have a cap expert like Tom Penn.  Believe me, he's going to make an impact on this franchise because he is so sharp on all of those little loopholes and conditions in the Collective Bargaining Agreement which is a mass of legalese.  He is very adept at that.  It's a vibrant and creative front office.

Exciting times indeed.  Great chat as always!

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

these interviews...
show exactly why it's fun to be a blazer fan right now. we're not winning yet and we don't take anything for granted. i think any real blazer fan has to be thrilled about the people running the team right now... young, new ideas, willing to take risks, looking at the bigger picture.

I'm not as excited about character and culture as KP because i think these things are often the product of winning, not the cause. but i love how KP and the new guy talk so much about Portland, about what the blazers mean to the city and what the city means to the blazers. that such talented, players and management alike, want to invest their skills in this team and this city makes me proud. and excited to see what they can accomplish. i hope whomever is chosen with the #1 understands the importance of this, and i think that's probably a big part of why interviews are so important to KP.

Thanks again, Dave, for doing these recaps. They are often the highlights of my workday. Because I get payed to read blazersedge woohoo!

by little joey @ Blazer's Edge on Jun 1, 2007 2:32 PM PDT reply actions  

the recaps are always great
and whether quick is 100% correct or not when he speculates it's interesting to hear from someone who's much closer to it all than most of us.

i used to know a sportswriter who covered the blazers -- during the bad times, and he was kind of a shifty character himself. i heard a lot of off-the-reservation stuff about drinking and smoking dope and groupies and how it seemed there was a full-time staff working to keep the public from finding out anything.

whew! this guy went on to write crime novels -- he lives on the east coast now....but this group of athletes seem like completely different kinds of people. (except zach.)

ignacio

by ignacio on Jun 1, 2007 3:04 PM PDT reply actions  

Two things.
First, this:
I really think it will come down to the interviews...what Kevin will be able to glean when he meets them face to face and looks them in the eye.  That's another thing I've taken from both of these guys.  When they ask you a question they look you straight in the eye.  There were 20-30 people around each of these players and every time someone would ask a question both of these guys would look them in the eye.  That's the kind of thing that Kevin Pritchard likes.  Brandon Roy is very much like that.  I would love to be in those interviews and hear what Kevin Pritchard will ask both of these players.

But if BOTH guys are like that, how can the interview portion act as a tie-breaker?
What if that, itself, proves to be just another tie, on top of all the other mutual excellences?

Or is that simply not going to happen--is Pritchard's job in the interviews
to CREATE a difference between the two, no matter how hard that is?
Is KP gonna just keep prodding them face-to-face until one of them cracks,
mentally, emotionally, or psychologically?
Is he going to be in the Tom Cruise position of getting one of these guys into THAT moment:

Kevin Pritchard: "DID YOU order the code red?!?"
Kevin Durant: "YOU'RE GOD-DAMNED RIGHT I DID!!!"
___

Second thing: On the rumors flying around about who wants Conley to go
where Oden goes, I point you to this article, which
(in addition to featuring Oden's Topps/Russell card deal)
makes it all too clear who's stirring the pot on this one--and it ain't Oden or Pritchard:
[bold-faced emphasis my own]


"I mean two kids that won in summer basketball, won in junior high school, won in high school, won and were successful in college and then go pro together, that's probably never happened before in the history of the game,'' said Conley's father, Mike Conley Sr., who works for BDA Sports Management. "And if they were successful at the NBA level, that would be a marketer's dream.''

Oden's agent--and point guard Conley's dad--is the only one on record as saying
that PG Conley should go where Oden goes, that the team and the NBA would benefit from it.

Hey, thanks, DAD--thanks for trying to make your son an NBA champ.
Thanks for insisting that your son would run Oden's offense better than JJ, or anyone else.
Now pardon us all (Pritchard included) if we don't put such a priority on that.

Greg, you might wanna be open to the idea of switching agents at some point.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 1, 2007 3:18 PM PDT reply actions  

Think it through...
there's a pretty good chance Oden will be a champion some day.  Far less chance for Conley.  It would behoove Conley Sr. to do everything in his power to get his son on a team that has a great chance at a championship.  It also would behoove him greatly to do exactly what he said, have two kids come all the way up from grade school to the NBA championship.   The endorsements on that deal could be astronomical.

He'd be foolish not to try for it.

by ken @ Blazer's Edge on Jun 1, 2007 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well yeh--that's exactly the point (pun intended)!
Dude's acting in his own self-interest, and NOT that of his client, Greg Oden.

That's no way for an agent to act; why is he taking that job?
That'd be like an administration politicizing the Justice Depar*

[Quality Pie mysteriously disappears to an unspecified site in Turkey for interrogation]

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 1, 2007 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Right Culture
QualityPie now reports from Turkey that it is imperative for the Blazers to prove their patriotism by drafting Spencer Hawes ahead of Greg Oden.

by crakarjack on Jun 2, 2007 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

On point #1
The way I understand it, there is no tie.  Oden is the fairly clear pick.  He'd have to totally blow the interview and Durant would have to ace it to swing the vote.  Or at least KP would have to see an irreplaceable spark in KD.

--Dave

by Dave on Jun 1, 2007 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

i'm not so convinced
that Oden is the cut and dry number one. I think there's got to be some part of the Blazer brain trust that sees something pretty special in Durant... given his age and what he's accomplished, he's got a chance to be one of the best players ever. Not that he'll necessarily reach that potential, but it's there. I'm not sure you can say the same about Oden, even if he is the logical choice because of size and what he brings.

by little joey @ Blazer's Edge on Jun 1, 2007 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah--that's the sense I've gotten.
So going into the interviews, it's Oden's job to lose, and Durant's to gain?
Breaking even means it's Oden; it would take a Durant breakthroguh AND an Oden choke
for the choice to swing from Oden to Durant. It could happen, but only that way.

Okay.
It's Oden unless Pritchard unearths some weird harsh personal truth from him.

Blazers have a five-on-three...and they pull it back and wait for help.

by QualityPie on Jun 1, 2007 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

LittleJoey has reason...
Good point about winning builds character.  For the longest time, we had character that prevented us from winning.  But now with most of those elements gone, we might be able to take some chances again with players that might have some character issues.  (hint hint....Zbo might fit into that description)

We've got guys that want to win, want to win and want to win.  They are listening to coaches, general managers and their own desires to win.  

For players that come into this league, looking for the dollars, they are just selling a skill.  But for the players that are in the league to prove that they are the best and that they can lead teams to victory, their success will be rewarded with adoration from fans, product endorsements from vendors and respect from their peers.  

Jordan was rewarded for his success, not paid for it.  I'm sure that if Chicago had pushed a little, he would have taken less money, during the last three-peat.  For MJ, it was all about the winning.  He proved that with his unsuccessful Second return from retirement.  

Now we got guys that say they can bring winning and championships, but want to get paid up front.  

Don't be surprised to see guys ditching the MAX NBA contracts to play with other guys that just want to win.  I'm not just talking about the Karl Malones or the Gary Paytons trying to chase that ring.  I'm talking big names deciding that winning is where the money is and pulling together their own teams.  Imagine Lebron, opting out of his contract to take the Min to play in LA.  Let's just say that he sells Carmello or DWade or Bosh to join him the same way.  

It's possible.  And with the shift turning away from how much this player makes and that player makes, to what has this player done, or that player done, you could see a growing trend of All Stars puting together teams just to make runs at the championship.  

Granted the Cap was put into place so that small teams could be competitive in drawing free agents.  But imaging if, on some sort of ...whim, that Kobe decided to play for Charlotte, convinced J-Kidd, Amare and Shaq that they would make more money if they took a minor contract with Bobcats to make a run at the Title.  

Players, for the last 15 years, were banking on the NBA for their longevity.  But with Salaries so increadibly rediculous, money doesn't matter any more.  (Not totally true, but to a point, it's not as important as it used to be)  Winning is becoming once again the focus of young players coming into this league.  

Tyrus Thomas proved that there are still guys coming into this league just to get their paychecks.   But guys like Brandon Roy has shown that there are players that desire success on the court more than a hefty pay-day.  

I'm thankful that KP is weeding out those type of guys.

Was Damon really a bad Blazer, or did he get the short end of the stick?

by rpxxxiv on Jun 1, 2007 3:23 PM PDT reply actions  

Who were the characters that prevented us?
Rasheed Wallace?  Bonzi Wells?  Ruben Patterson?  Damon Stoudamire?

All of those guys actually did better after they left here than the team that was left did.  Not one of the guys we got back for them is in the playoffs this year, (or on the Blazers).

by EnglandDan on Jun 1, 2007 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

my point was actually...
that winning comes before character, not character before winning. Let me be clear, I think talent wins basketball games, not personalities. There ways in which character is very important- players need to work together to maximize their skills on the court; we want guys who are committed to Portland and will stay after their rookie contracts; we don't want someone with enough legal trouble to keep him off the court. But most of the time, I think the character bit is overrated. A good basketball player doesn't have to be likeable. The problem with the Jail Blazers was that they had lousy character AND weren't great basketball players.

I've always been a huge baseball fan, and it's even more clear there, since contributions are almost entirely individual. it doesn't matter if players are nice people or not as long as they hit homeruns and sink baskets. In basketball there's a lot more teamwork so people need to work together, but that doesn't necessarily mean they can't go to stripclubs or carry weapons.

I don't believe in building on character, I believe in talent.

by little joey @ Blazer's Edge on Jun 1, 2007 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

How do you promote someone like Zach?
Great chat and great recap.  I learn more about the team through these things than anything else.

Is Zach really that clueless as to how he's perceived?  Maybe if he'd act like a grown-up, people would treat him like a grown-up.

I agree having Conley's dad represent you is a bad idea.  I don't want Conley, JJ or Sergio might not be ready but they both have potential.  Getting a vet like Blake, who also happens to be a hell of a guy, would be fantastic.

Man, I can't wait til the end of June.

by leeroyjenkins on Jun 1, 2007 3:36 PM PDT reply actions  

I think Zach's opinion on himself is pretty good.
He knows he's not liked that much but he knows he's got some NBA skills at the elite level that will serve him well.

by EnglandDan on Jun 1, 2007 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks
Want to give Dave a note of thanks for the transcribed interviews.  Many people would rather read than listen and this provides that option.  Certainly a lot of tedious work and cramped fingers!

Thanks again, Dave!!!

by Engineering Problem on Jun 1, 2007 4:41 PM PDT reply actions  

If I were...
If I were Oden or Durant, I would tell everyone (media included) that I wanted to go to Portland. Surely they both do, given that Seattle doesn't have a GM or coach, and God knows where the Sonics will be in two years.

I'm sure KP would like to hear it.

If you weren't to get that #1 pick and got sent to Seattle, then you could win over the fans in Kansas City or Oklahoma City when you eventually got there.

by MattD on Jun 1, 2007 4:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Thanks Dave
I appreciate the lengthy analysis and the articles. I might not be a Blazer fan but watching how this organization develop, not exactly from the ground up but in a new direction, is entirely fascinating stuff. I suspect nobody outside of Portland much cares about Penn, or even Pritchard's age but this is big stuff. I wonder if that will get much airplay on the national airwaves. Probably not.
Who needs Greg Oden? We got Pete Carril....

by pookeyguru on Jun 1, 2007 8:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Man these articles make it tough
on who to root for. I want Oden simply because he will dominate the paint and keep us competitive no matter what. I hated Ohio State and have been very anti-oden during college because I love Michigan, but when it comes time to think NBA game, there's not a doubt in my mind he's not going to win a title and own the all star game the next 10 years.

But I loooooooove Kevin Durant. It was awesome watching him in college, I love the way he talks. He is going to be phenomenal. He's a gym rat, I love those kind of players. Jarrett Jack's a gym rat, Zbo's a gym rat. These guys are always going to be good.

Sigh..

to bad we can't have both..

I refuse to be disappointed with either pick though. Deep down in my heart I think Oden is the right pick but I will never criticize KP and the Blazers front office.

Welcome Greg Oden

by junit3123 @ Blazer's Edge on Jun 1, 2007 10:36 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Trade Drawer: The Big 5?
Kpavatar2_small
Not 5, not 6, not 7, not EVER - Junk with Heat poll
Small
Dissecting the Champions
Kitten_small
What Happened to the Junk Junk Drawer 5 12 12
Small
Batum and Salary - a Comp

Recent FanPosts

Duck_pot_small
View from Pounding the Rock
Duck_pot_small
View from Cannis Hoopus on Batum
450px-the_thinker__rodin_small
Top Free Agents: Centers
1_small
LMA or Dirk ?
Myvydas_small
Blazers Reportedly Interested in Any Current NBA GM/AGM. Anyone.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Quick: Stern Says Blazers Not For Sale; More GM Interviews Coming
Freeman: Blazers Want To Bring Over Joel Freeland, Victor Claver

Recent FanShots

If you liked my SABAS Arvydas Sabonis video, here's my 2nd highlight video: MAGIC vs BIRD. Songs...
Good news for Seattle?
Would Houston Do This Trade?
Schwan analyzes Dragic versus Jack
Haynes: Batum's Agent Says No Waiting For Blazers
Valencia's GM: Victor Claver Will Stay In Spain Next Season
OKC exploits Andrew Bynum’s weakness
Ben Golliver helped us out at SB Nation Studios in New York with some recap and analysis of Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Semis between the Heat and Pacers. Rumor has it he'll be our point of contact for the Lakers-Thunder series as well. Thanks Ben!

Also, BE denizens, am I correct to assume you all are pulling for the Thunder in that series?
OT, but the Onion does it again...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm