Game 75 Recap
OK, I know they were missing their top two players (but we were missing two also) and I know this game didn't mean much in the long run and maybe would have been better to lose if you believe in lottery stuff...but I'm grinning ear to ear anyway. Why? Because winning is FUN!
Rockets 78 Blazers 85
Boxscore
Team Observations
--First and foremost, this was a chippy, hard-fought game. Both teams looked like they really wanted it. Both teams were fighting hard. This was not a "play out the string" kind of contest. The Rockets got pretty physical with us and we got pretty physical back, which is a component we've been missing for a long time. This wasn't a brain win or heart win as much as a gut win, and gut wins are a very good sign.
--I thought I was flashing back to '91 for a little while there with our two starting guards clicking on all cylinders like that. A lot of the credit for this game goes to Roy and Jack. They were both fantastic...aggressive, passionate, fairly smart. Their multi-purpose skill sets also made it hard for the Rockets to key on them. They were driving, shooting, passing, the whole works. An important stat: between the two of them Roy and Jack only had four turnovers. Some nights each has that. I'm not saying they're Porter and Drexler, but I am saying we haven't seen that kind of potential for great guard play in a tandem since Porter and Drexler. If they could ever develop to the point where that happens every night...whooo! Look out! One would hope this could be a coming out party of sorts.
--The starting frontcourt also did us fairly proud. Jamaal deserves about three gold stars for this game. More on him in a minute. Ime and Raef didn't exactly light up the boxscore but they were in the right place at the right time on defense more than once. Talk about exceeding expectations...this trio certainly looked far better on the court than they do on paper.
--The bench tonight was not so good. Houston made their runs mostly with our second unit in. This is where the injuries hurt. The first unit played marvelously and cohesively but there just weren't enough horses in the corral when they got tired.
--Once again we got pounded on the offensive boards but once again that was the ONLY stat we got pounded on. Shooting: 44% to 38% us. Three point shooting: 54% to 22% us. Free throws attempted: 24-21 us. Defensive rebounds: tied at 29. Assists: 13 to 12 us. Blocks: 5 to 2 us. Steals: 5 to 2 us. Turnovers: 10 to 12 us. For the most part I'll give up that offensive board deficit if I can get the rest of that every night. For most of the year it's been the opposite: we're an excellent offensive rebounding team that gets beaten everywhere else. Offensive rebounds are nice but they're just not that important.
--Our defense was active from the tip. All five guys on the floor were into it for the starting unit, including and especially Jamaal! I loved seeing that defensive effort! A couple of guys from the second unit were still saddling up at the Lazy D Ranch but overall this was one of our better efforts in a while.
Individual Observations
--Let's start with Jarrett tonight, just for the heck of it. The guy scored 23 points on 9 shots. You LOVE to see that! It means he's firing accurately and getting to the line. He was 6-8 from the three point free throw line. I love the aggressive Jarrett! You know you're going to get something from Roy but when Jack is on too you actually have a chance. He's a difference-maker. Now he just needs to keep walking, talking, and playing like he's a difference-maker.
--Brandon...what can you say? They ran everything and the kitchen sink at him again. He still shot 50%, scored 24, and opened up a lot of easy opportunities for other guys. You just get astounded by the maturity of his game as a rookie. And the great thing is, he wasn't perfect tonight by any stretch of the imagination. He had some questionable shots and a couple breakdowns. But his game was still EXCELLENT. This is just his game! His normal game is FANTASTIC! You gotta love that.
--I don't care what you've said about him previously and whether it was deserved or not. Tonight everybody needs to get up on their feet and give it up for Jamaal. He had 14 rebounds when nobody else but Raef was getting any (14 doubles the next leading rebounder on the team) and scored 12 on some mean inside shots when nobody else could get in the post either. Even more impressively he set the tone for physicality. Mutumbo and company were starting to push us around and he said, "Enough of THAT!" He dunked over `Deke, hung there, and woofed at him. He shoved Shane Battier flat on the floor after Battier fouled him hard. ("You wanna see hard? HERE!") The ref didn't even call the push back because he knew Shane had come at him first. He was a good stopper inside, rotated great on defense...you could not have asked for a better game from Jamaal and I don't think we've seen one. No Jamaal, no win tonight. It's just as simple as that.
--Ime and Raef, as I mentioned above, showed pretty big tonight all things considered. Raef got 7 rebounds and 3 blocks and played some active defense. Ime's shot was off but he set the tone early with some hustle steals. Could we live with them starting for 82 games? Maybe not. But tonight they gave what we needed and stayed out of the way otherwise. You have to love guys who don't need the ball to be effective.
--I guess Outlaw was the main guy off the bench if there was one. He did score 9 (by far the second unit high) and got a couple of blocks and a steal. But he still wasn't passing tonight and I wasn't in love with his shot selection. He did hit a big one from the top of the key off a Brandon pass to help seal the game. You have to give him that. But most of the night, to me anyway, he just looked a little whacked. Here's an NBA reality check for ya: if you're going to make your living shooting the ball every time you touch it, fine...but you're going to be judged on how well you shoot then, and you'll be judged harshly. There's no middle ground if that's your game, you either hit it or you missed. No excuses. You want to pass, create for others, rotate on defense and such then we can talk, but otherwise it's pretty black and white. Tonight he only hit 3 of 8 and they didn't look all that good.
--Sergio shot 2-5 and got 5 points which was the second highest point total from the bench group. He also had 2 assists in 16 minutes but he also had 2 turnovers. He probably would have had a couple more assists if the bench shooters had been connecting on open shots. Still, I'm trying to remember how long it's been since I really saw the offense run smoothly through Sergio. I know it's been a while.
--Fred Jones looked pretty active tonight but only shot 1-5. Martell had another one of those "don't ask" games and never saw minutes in the second half. I wonder if we shouldn't be setting him up for more 16-18 foot jump shots instead of having him bomb threes or making him drive off the dribble. Most teams will give you a mid-range jumper and they should be like candy for him. Right now though, if your game is shooting and you can't shoot that's bad news.
Miscellaneous Notes
--The starting lineups tonight included Dikembe Mutumbo, Juwon Howard, Jamaal Magloire, and Raef LaFrentz. That would have been a pretty strong lineup circa 2001.
--Luke Schenscher busted my TV with his jumper. Then I got the thing working again and Rafer Alston's shot came off the rim so hard it punched a hole in my wall. Next time I'm wearing a helmet.
--It's nice to see Bonzi Wells is still heading firmly towards getting his number retired. Not hung in the rafters, mind you...just retired.
--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
yeah!
Plus he wrapped him in a
--Dave
Jarrett Jack's play usually...
The game
the only point where you and i
i think most of his shots are reasonably chosen. i don't think we've by any means seen the best he is capable of on offense. he's one player we've watched visibly improve this season.
just imagine if he learns how to consistently finish in traffic at the rim. and/or is inspired to attack the offensive boards. he may learn slowly according to some, but he learns.
look how well he now responds to pressure. he hit the jumper against houston without hesitation despite the fact he wasn't having an especially good shooting night. the other night he compensated for a bad night from the field by hitting 9-10 FTs. he started out against utah by going 1-5, but was undeterred (just like a real scorer) and ended up with 22 pts.
he plays with willpower now. you can see him kick himself mentally when he makes a mistake. you can also see him concentrate and play hard.
sure, he needs to pass better, particularly once he starts his drive, but this may, with coaching, still come.
my opinion earlier this season was that he might end up a nice player off the bench, but i'm no longer sure that's his ceiling.
Maybe so
--Dave
Cheers to Jack
Man, that was just the kind of NBA game that makes me want to get rid of our slowfooted post players and play the uptempo game. Jeff Van Gundy has consistently ushered in some of the hardest to watch basketball in the last 10 years. He's definitely a throw back to the eastern conference slugfest days. is Chuck Hayes his Charles Oakley? It was great to see Mags puff his chest but if I have to watch his post game for another season.......Ill pray every night that we never have this many injuries again.
It was fun to watch
Oh
Ooops
And how about that brilliant ESPN headline, by the way. "Short-handed Rockets lose". It's like they have a congenital aversion to mentioning anything forthright about a Blazer win.
--Dave
Yea
ooh
"Going into a timeout, I told B-Roy that I have a three in me, and he told me, 'I'll find you,' " Jack said.
And sure enough, Roy hit Jack with a pass, and Jack swished the shot, prompting a spirited retort of "I told you so!" to the fans, many of whom became red-faced.
"Jarrett and me feel that one day we can be a tandem in this league like (Detroit's) Chauncey Billups and Rip Hamilton," Roy said. "We hope that one day we can become that. Right now, this is the beginning stages and we are learning how to play with each other."
Excellent game recap by Quick, and of course the never to be underestimated NOR underappreciated Dave's recaps.
Maglorious!
If so, he has made up for every bobble, travel, and backboard shattering hookshot.
Like you say Dave, his toughness is very important to this team right now. Now that he's getting minutes he isn't AS much of a blackhole, but still is. I wouldn't have as many complaints if he just got the ball in dunking position (and catches it clean)...
I'm very happy with how he's played though. This is how he plays in NBA 2K7! He's a pretty good post player in that, and now he is starting to match his game persona.
I like a guy that other teams are probably afraid of physically.
Mortimer
ps Let's not go crazy and re-sign him though. Unless he's cheap and okay with backing up LaMarcus (if no one else in his position comes around... I see Oden slipping to the 8th spot, because everyone is expecting him to go #1! The Bobcats will go for Hawes at #1, cause Jordan loves unathletic overrated white guys, and everyone else will move too slow to change their gameplan and just draft their original top guy. And then quick thinking Pritchard comes in and drafts up Oden or Durant! I CALLED IT FIRST.)
My goodness I just rationalized re-signing Magloire. His "cover face" dunk and unnecessary one handed rebounds have even become endearing to me. Things I never thought possible! I must re-examine my entire life now...
Outlaw
But, Outlaw seems to have a knack from coming up big when we need him. There has been several times this year where we really need a little scoring burst, and Trout seems to be the guy that steps up (although, there is the PHO layup). Tonight he had the big shot and big block at the end of the game to seal it up. To me this is Trouts most endearing quality.
This is the frustrating thing with Trout. You hate the black hole and love the clutch performance. The problem is which one is wins out in the end?
by TearsforDuckworth on Apr 7, 2007 7:17 AM PDT reply actions
Real nice
Each possession - expecially in tight games or in critical games like the playoff's - is thought to be have a lot of importance attached to it. Since an offensive rebound gives the team another possession, in my mind it seems thus to be very important. No?
Yes
Team assists, steals, and blocks are generally overrated also, at least the way I see it.
--Dave
Another way to look at it
Your guy goes for an offensive rebound. Most of those he's going to miss. And when he does he's now behind the play with the ball going the other way ahead of him. If there are two of your guys going for that offensive rebound and they miss it, woe be unto you. We've now got a break in hand.
Offensive rebounds can be critical in certain possessions. I've seen strings of them demoralize an opponent. But on the whole over time they their value tends to be more marginal. I'd rather have a great defensive team, a great offensive team, or even a great defensive rebounding team.
--Dave
I'm glad you asked this
[and at this point I started thinking "aloud" or writing as I was thinking and I think I understand Dave's comment now. Here's my thought process...] Of course if our shooting percentage is high then there won't be as many rebounds available. Last night Houston had 3 times as many ORs as we did - and lost - but their shooting percentage was over 6% below ours. They also had more FGAs. The Jazz had 4 times as many ORs as we did - and over 10 more FGAs - but a lower shooting pct. and we beat them.
So a high total of ORs won't win a game for you, but one well-timed one certainly can. Maybe Dave was looking at a box of 70 apples while we were examining only a couple and - surprise - coming to different conclusions about apples.

by 































