Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Nevin Shapiro Vows To Bring Down Miami

Game 67 Recap

This was a very, very good win.  Not so much because it was a good game, mind you.  It was pretty ugly on both sides out there tonight.  But we fought back against a decent team and were really quite poised going down the stretch.  But most of all it would have simply crushed the guys--and probably all of us--to lose another one in dramatic fashion (as was looking possible in the final seconds) and for that reason alone it's a great victory.

Wizards 98, Blazers 100
Boxscore

Team Observations:

--The shooting out there was nothing short of gross...for both sides.  It was a hard game to watch...surprisingly so for two relatively inept defensive teams.  However we hit far more clutch shots down the stretch than they did.  We also shared the ball far better in the second half than they did (or than we, ourselves had done in the first half).  It felt like the first bunch to come together as a team was going to win this game and that turned out to be us.

--We didn't get pasted on the boards!  Woohoo!  And what a job we did team rebounding!  We ended up outrebounding them by 2.  We didn't get a whole lot of offensive rebounds, but even though it may seem sacrilegious to say on a team that scores quite a few points that way, I think offensive rebounds are one of the more overrated stats out there.  You get very few of them by percentage and when your team really thrives on that you often get your pants beat off in transition because guys are hanging back under the hoop instead of running back.  In other words, I don't care much that we only got 8 offensive boards.  This was still a great night rebounding for a young and mostly undersized team.

--We didn't turn the ball over and we only trailed the Wizards in foul shots by six (by 4 in made foul shots).  That gave us a chance to win.

--Despite all that, the biggest reason we won this hugely imperfect game was one Gilbert "Colonel Klank" Arenas.  His shooting was awful.  No...no...wait.  Let me try that again.  His shooting was AWFUL.  He went 4-16 for the night (one better than his 3-15 effort earlier in the year).  The only ways he scored were layups and free throws.  Anything else was repugnant.  And nothing more so than his last-second shot to tie the game.  We were up 100-98 and he had the ball at the top of the three-point arc with three seconds left.  Instead of hoisting for the win he drove.  He beat the socks off of his man and pulled up before he could be bothered by the next layer of defense.  This left him a wide-open 10-12 foot shot.  He had beaten his man so badly my instinctive thought was, "Dang!  Here comes overtime!"  Colonel Klank didn't even live up to his nickname though.  That 10-foot shot never touched rim.  It fell a good THREE FEET SHORT.  It was the most amazingly pathetic shot I've seen in...forever.  In his book "Loose Balls" Terry Pluto describes the last shot of prolific scorer Marvin Barnes' career.  He rose up and lofted a ball that fell way short like a duck that had been shot out of the sky.  That's an apt description of this shot.  Of course the good Colonel is at the apex of his career and not the end, but does that make the shot better or worse?

Individual Observations

--Brandon Roy was the MAN tonight.  To be honest in the first part of the game it looked like he was having trouble dealing with all of the extra attention the Wizards were throwing his way.  But when it came down to the fourth quarter and we needed shots he was the Clutch-o-Matic in spades.  Have I mentioned how much I love this guy?  He's not just our future, he's our present.  He's started to prove that in the last part of this season.  And, by the way, on a night when we needed extra rebounding he grabbed 12.  He had 5 turnovers too, but we'll give him a pass on his first night as Da Man.

--Lamarcus Aldridge was the other brilliant player.  You'd think maybe with Zach out he'd put extra pressure on himself to carry the load.  But he didn't do anything outside of what he's capable of doing.  I swear he looked like a ten-year vet out there in that sense.  It was wonderful!  He ended up shooting 9-15, drawing 8 foul shots, grabbing 8 rebounds, and adding 2 assists, 3 steals, and 2 blocks along with 25 big points.  Wow.

--The rest of the starting unit also played within themselves.  There was little panic in this game.  In fact if anything there was too little energy at first.  Ime, Jamaal, and Jarrett all filled their roles.

--Travis Outlaw really needs to hit some of the open shots his teammates are setting him up with.  His 12 shots were by far the most among the second unit guys but he missed 9 of them.

--Sergio had 9 points and 9 assists in 22 minutes.  The Espresso junkies can relax...you're going to get another shot or two based on this game.  He had a SPECTACULAR alley-oop to Freddie Jones that should make SportsCenter tonight.

--Martell Webster came alive in the fourth quarter!  When we needed it he hit two key three point shots plus later he got a conventional three-point play off of a strong drive.  11 points, 4 rebounds, an assist, and a steal ain't bad for 20 minutes.

--Fred Jones hit 3-4 tonight but his outside shot still looks iffy.  That dunk though.  WOW.  I like him.

Miscellaneous Observations

--Antawn Jamison had a really great game.  I was actually far more scared that he'd attempt the last shot of the game than Illbert.  

OK...how many nicknames can one guy have?  Just as long as I don't end up on the pages of his blog myself, I guess.  "Dave had THREE typos in ONE post!  And his use of parentheses for everything is craptacular.  I bet he's a Swagless Wonder in real life."  Then, of course, I would be forced to challenge Mr. Arenas to an exotic dance-off and that would get really messy.

--Dave (blazersub@yahoo.com)

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Webster
is a baaaaad man.. haha.. I loved when he got taken out late in the 4th, and had a mean mug on. I went nuts when he made that tough drive and1. He really need's to do that more often, and you could see right after Roy ran over to him, grabbed him, and I guarantee you he was sayin ''thats what you need to do baby''.

LaMARVELOUS ALDRIDGE haha.. what a stud. A stat filler for the next decade.. amazing.. When we drafted him I was worried cause I'd read alot of bad scouting reports, saying he was to soft, to skinny, bound to be a bust.. who knew he could drain 18 footers like nothin.

Roy.. only a matter of time till Nike discovers that killer crossover. Sometimes he makes defenders just disappear off screen with that weapon.

That dunk.. = WOW... Last time his oop didn't make sportscenter, if it don't tonight, then Bristol can go to hell. (sorry)

ROY for R.O.Y.

by junit3123 @ Blazer's Edge on Mar 20, 2007 11:06 PM PDT reply actions  

Rookies led every major stat category
Aldridge, Roy, and Sergio led in every major category, if I'm not mistaken: points, assists, rebounds, blocks, and steals.  

Has this happened for us before?  Maybe I just never noticed it, but I can't remember a group of rookies for the Blazers lead us in everything.  

We got the best youngsters in the league.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Mar 20, 2007 11:23 PM PDT reply actions  

I wish
JJ would get his head straight.  I saw flashes of him doing that in the second half, but when he is struggling the first unit looks lethargic and bad.  I'm really pulling for him to turn it around out there.
Friday the 13th/walking down Elm Street/ Come in my realm you get beat

by JPop on Mar 21, 2007 12:32 AM PDT reply actions  

so roy, aldridge and rodriguez
all played well....and webster, outlaw (though he had an off shooting night) and jack are pretty much the next guys getting time.....other than a walk-on (udoka) and a back-up center who everyone knows won't be coming back.

that's a YOUNG team. some have progressed faster than others, but you have to give the coaches credit. this is in the realm of the fab five at michigan 10-12 years ago.

ignacio

by ignacio on Mar 21, 2007 1:25 AM PDT reply actions  

Okay
I'm baffled. I just watched NBA.com's Top 10 plays of the day, and the Gilbert Arenas to Haywood dunk is on the top 10, but the Sergio to Freddie for a revese two-handed alley-oop is NOT. WTF?

Does this make any sense? That Gilbert play was nothing spectacular. Sergio does that 3 times a game with LMA.

by damir on Mar 21, 2007 2:11 AM PDT reply actions  

Dave
It seems like you don't have a tag closed somewhere in your list up in the jersey contest, and it has moved every post below this one over to the right.

by damir on Mar 21, 2007 2:16 AM PDT reply actions  

"most hated man
in Portland not named ex-Blazer Rasheed Wallace"?  Really?  I get why the crowd booed him this one game, but he's one of my favorites.  His 50 point guarantees are just playing -- like yelling "Hibachi" or cheating to win his one-handed three shooting with teammate Deshawn.  Hint: he's really not going to give up a year of his career to go back to college so he can try to score 70 or 80 on Duke either.

Ra's one of my favorite non Blazers too.  I guess I'm out of touch with Blazer fandom...

by howlingfantods on Mar 21, 2007 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Funniest 24 seconds of the night
Was anybody else at the game to see the guy at half time try to make as many free throws as he could in 24 seconds?  That may have been the funniest thing I have ever seen.  I think one shot looked like it had a chance of going in.  Most were airballs or hit only backboard.  He sets up to shoot from half court to win $250 (half court since he failed to make a single free throw out of probably 20 tries) and the whole Rose Garden is booing him.  Poor guy.

I have to say I liked the way the second unit looked ;last night better than the first unit.  I take that back.  I liked the second unit + Aldridge, and sometimes Roy.  Roy actually seemed to slow the pace when he got in, like he wasn't sure how to play with Sergio/Martel/Outlaw/Jones.  Sergio may end up with more TOs than Jack, but he puts the defense on their heels and gets all of the other four guys invested in the game.  They know that if they get open, they have a great chance of getting the pass.

by HarryManback on Mar 21, 2007 8:38 AM PDT reply actions  

not too many TOs
sergio only had one more TO than Jack and that was because of a ridiculous no-call from the refs when he was clearly pushed out of bounds. Sergio actually has the third best assist-to-turnover ratio in the NBA, 3.63. Jack is down at 34th with 2.27. (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/statistics?stat=nbaassists&sort=astto&avg=pg&seasontype=2)

by sergioFTW on Mar 21, 2007 9:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh, I'm surprised you didn't mention it
but how about that officiating last night?  Even the presumably homer'ish guys calling the game for D.C. tv (I watched it on LP) was questioning the many calls against the Blazers, and Salvatore's travelling calls against Roy were especially absurd; if they called that consistently against everyone, no one would use the crossover.

In other Roy news, Bargnani's out for the season after getting appendectomy surgery.  They can start engraving the name on the statue now.

by howlingfantods on Mar 21, 2007 9:10 AM PDT reply actions  

If that statue
had gone anywhere near Bargnani in the first place the Portland fans would have stormed David Stern's offices with pitchforks and torches.

--Dave

by Dave on Mar 21, 2007 9:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hah
I get what you're saying but I could see an argument for Il Mago.  He's got a better upside and is more likely to be a perennial allstar playing on an already established good team.

Roy's got a tougher row to hoe playing for a cellar dweller with a bad recent rep like the Jailblazers.  Hell, ray allen, who is about where I consider Roy's upside is, had to be an injury sub this year as an allstar playing for another cellar dweller.  And while I love Roy's clutchness and crossover penetration moves, he's not exactly the second coming of the human highlight film.

Team record has never mattered too much for ROY, but it's something to hang your jacket on if you're the NBA and consider that Toronto's a much bigger market, and you want to promote and recognize Canada basketball more than our little market.  It's always worthwhile to remember that awards and trophies are ultimately just marketing pieces.

by howlingfantods on Mar 21, 2007 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Larry Bird never looked all that good
But he was just better than everyone else.  Doesn't have to be flashy as long as he gets it done.  
And Roy is getting it done.

From what I have seen of the Barge (which is admittedly little), he hasn't looked any more flashy than Roy has.  Mostly just jumpers and an occasional post move.

Are you suggesting that coconuts migrate??

by shenanigans on Mar 21, 2007 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

We've got some decent free throw shooters.
Centers and rookies are both notorious miss-freebies categories.
And yet, our rookie center is pretty much nails--take THAT, Shaq!
In fact, there's not a guy on our team I would describe as sub-par at the charity stripe.
(Yes, I'm still bitter over that 10-for-20 performance in the Spurs game.)

As for offensive boards, I look at it this way: they turn missed shots into passes.
Sometimes, when combined with superior overall rebounding,
a points-in-the-paint advantage and getting to the line more,
it can paint a picture of better work and hustle--but not O-boards by itself.

I also view turnovers as the equivalent of a missed-shot/defensive-rebound sequence.
(There's also giving up easy baskets to consider, but I think
points off turnovers is a better indicator of that;
some turnovers are NOT easy-basket opportunities for the opposition,
such as offensive fouls, traveling, passing to the bleachers--
anything that stops the clock and makes them inbound from their backcourt.)

So here's what I often do when looking at a boxscore, especially if
the winning team seems to have a worse shooting percentage than the losers:
Take the turnovers and offensive boards, and adjust the "shots attempted" by the difference.
(Since a turnover is a missed shot that never got taken to be credited,
and an offensive board is a pass, credited as a shot attempt.)
If turnovers are greater than offensive rebounds, ADD the difference
to the shot attempts; if turnovers are fewer, SUBTRACT the difference.
It's really simple (about 5th-grade-level math, in my opinion) and tells a lot.
It doesn't get into what kind of game was played, or break down
how the stats got to where they were or anything too complicated or analytical.
It just breaks down non-free-throw possessions into 2 categories:
1) Gave the other guys the ball without us scoring.
2) Gave the other guys the ball because we scored.

It's just that simple.

Between here and there is better than either here or there.

by QualityPie on Mar 21, 2007 11:33 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The ultimate coverage and analysis of the Portland Trail Blazers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Blazers Future Regarding Free Agent Signings
Small
Thunderous Manboobies
Img_0878_1__small
Why do we hate LaMarcus Aldridge?
Small
Oregonlive "journalists" 2 new posts...same old drivel
2474796688_7cdc78828f_o_small
Greg Oden Suffers Life-Ending Injury; Gets 3-Year Extension

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Blazers' Future Regarding Trades
Small
WHAT TO DO WITH NIC BATUM BECAUSE WE WILL LOSE HIM IF NOT TRADED.
Small
Trade that helps us out now and the future
Small
How can the All-Star game be more fun and competitive?
Small
Earl Boykins!
Small
LaMarcus Aldridge about to become the 10th highest scorer in Blazers franchise  history
Small
New trade that gets us a new point and a three point shooter
Small
Portland getting.....
Small
The Sun Behind the Clouds: Blazers still on track.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

It's pretty clear that the season is over already ;)
Double rainbow of sadness:

1) JBay is getting shorter
2) We never got to see him with a mustache

I miss you tiny raptor man.

via The Basketball Jones http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2012/02/09/things-of-note-for-february-9-2012/#more-34561
Blazers Broadcasters Mike Barrett and Mike Rice re-enacted NBA referee Scott Foster's controversial goaltending call on Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, who was defending Oklahoma City Thunder All-Star forward Kevin Durant, during this week's edition of Blazers Courtside. Remarkably, no one was injured during the taping of this segment.

Original video of the play here. 
Quotes from the players and coaches here. 
The NBA admitting it got the call wrong here. 
Dave's  extended thoughts here. 
BlazersMakr's FanShot: Major Vegas action on OKC prior to tip here. 
Audio of Chad Doing of 750 AM The Game going HAM on Foster here.

OK, that should just about wrap up the goaltending discussion.

Courtside video via Blazers Broadcasting cameraman John Curry.

-- Ben Golliver | benjamin.golliver@gmail.com | Twitter
In 2008 Tim Donaghy indicated that Scott Foster was a ref that also fixed games
Blazers Owner Paul Allen Ranked No. 3 American Philanthropist In 2011

Recent FanShots

"You Must Be Known For Your Defense, Because You Definitely Stole My Heart"
Bill Simmons: Deron Williams To Dallas 'Is A Lock'
LaMarcus Aldridge Needs Support Around Him
LaMarcus Aldridge Finds Out He's An All-Star With His Teammates
Congratulations to Portland Trail Blazers forward LaMarcus Aldridge, on his first All Star selection.

As seen on www.trailblazers.com
AWoj: Aldridge an All Star
CRAZY stat from Houston game
NBA MVP Rankings... LMA @ #10

+ New FanShot All FanShots >


Editors

Kitten_small Dave

Headshotsmall_small Ben Golliver

Lead Moderators

Getfuzzy-satchel_small Timmay!

Bucky3_small Cablinasian

Authors

Plainlc_small Storyteller

Moderators

Lamb_small T Darkstar

Small douglast

Terryporter_small prezofdeath

Small usmcr3049

Lrg_magpie_small Corvid

Wallpaper_small geoffm